Nebulized flunisolide in infants and young children with asthma: a pilot study

Preventing Exacerbations in Preschoolers With Recurrent Wheeze: A Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Half of children experience wheezing by age 6 years, and optimal strategies for preventing severe exacerbations are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

Synthesize the evidence of the effects of daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), intermittent ICS, and montelukast in preventing severe exacerbations among preschool children with recurrent wheeze.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (1946, 2/25/15), Embase (1947, 2/25/15), CENTRAL.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included based on design (randomized controlled trials), population (children ≤6 years with asthma or recurrent wheeze), intervention and comparison (daily ICS vs placebo, intermittent ICS vs placebo, daily ICS vs intermittent ICS, ICS vs montelukast), and outcome (exacerbations necessitating systemic steroids).

DATA EXTRACTION

Completed by 2 independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (N = 4550) were included. Fifteen studies (N = 3278) compared daily ICS with placebo and showed reduced exacerbations with daily medium-dose ICS (risk ratio [RR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.79; NNT = 9). Subgroup analysis of children with persistent asthma showed reduced exacerbations with daily ICS compared with placebo (8 studies, N = 2505; RR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.70; NNT = 11) and daily ICS compared with montelukast (1 study, N = 202; RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92). Subgroup analysis of children with intermittent asthma or viral-triggered wheezing showed reduced exacerbations with preemptive high-dose intermittent ICS compared with placebo (5 studies, N = 422; RR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.81; NNT = 6).

LIMITATIONS

More studies are needed that directly compare these strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence to support daily ICS for preventing exacerbations in preschool children with recurrent wheeze, specifically in children with persistent asthma. For preschool children with intermittent asthma or viral-triggered wheezing, there is strong evidence to support intermittent ICS for preventing exacerbations.

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To report on recent studies on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on pulmonary function in young children with asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Inhaled corticosteroids are considered the most effective treatment for persistent asthma in children. Appropriate control of childhood asthma may prevent more serious disease or irreversible obstruction in later years. While some authors have described an improvement with the use of inhaled corticosteroids in young children, others found no clinical or functional benefit. Various studies have shown that inhaled corticosteroids ameliorate clinical outcomes, and recently a study demonstrated improvement in pulmonary function in young children with asthma. The use of different study designs may explain the lack of consistent results and disagreement regarding the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in these patients.

SUMMARY

Based on the preponderance of evidence, treatment with inhaled corticosteroids in infants and young children with recurrent wheeze and risk factors of developing asthma appears to allow better control of the illness and improve the pulmonary function.

Fluticasone improves pulmonary function in children under 2 years old with risk factors for asthma

This study assessed the effects of treatment with fluticasone in children younger than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing and risk factors of developing asthma. This double-blind placebo-controlled study randomized children to receive fluticasone (125 mug; n = 14) or placebo (n = 12) twice daily for 6 months. Pulmonary function was assessed at the beginning and end, and parents filled out a daily diary recording respiratory symptoms, need for rescue medication, and emergency care. The SD score of maximum flow at functional residual capacity was -0.74 +/- 0.6 at the beginning and 0.44 +/- 1 at the end for the fluticasone group (p = 0.001), and -0.79 +/- 0.3 at the beginning and -0.78 +/- 1.4 at the end for the placebo group (p = 0.97). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.02) was observed between treatments. The percentage of symptom-free days was 91.3 +/- 7% for fluticasone and 83.9 +/- 10% for placebo (p = 0.05). The number of respiratory exacerbations was 2.1 +/- 1.7 and 4.1 +/- 3 (p = 0.04), and the percentage of days on albuterol was 8.6 +/- 6% and 16.3 +/- 9% (p = 0.028). Treatment with fluticasone twice daily for 6 months improves pulmonary function and clinical outcomes in children with asthma younger than 2 years.

Efficacy of steroid treatments in the asthmatic preschool child

Asthma represents the most common chronic disease in preschool children. Hospital admission for wheezy disorders is the most common paediatric chronic disease causing hospital admission and more common in young children than later in life.

The output of flunisolide from different nebulisers

The objective of this study was to determine the output, in-vitro, solution of a concentrated solution of flunisolide from two different nebulisers under simulated breathing conditions. The BimboNeb and Nebula nebulisers were used to nebulise 2.6 mL of flunisolide solution (600 microg). Particle size was determined by inertial impaction and the total output of drug from the nebulisers under simulated breathing conditions was measured using a sinus flow pump. Two different breathing patterns were used, simulating nebuliser use by a child and an adult. The mass median aerodynamic diameter of flunisolide particles from the BimboNeb and Nebula were both 3.9 microm. With the simulated paediatric breathing pattern, both nebulisers delivered similar amounts of flunisolide (56.4 microg (s.d. 1.4 microg) and 56.1 microg (5 microg) over 5 min from the BimboNeb and Nebula, respectively). With the adult breathing pattern, flunisolide delivery from the BimboNeb was increased to 88.9 microg (3.3 microg), but delivery from the Nebula was only slightly increased to 64.6 microg (1.4 microg). With both nebulisers, little drug was released after 5 min of nebulisation. Both nebulisers delivered 9-15% of the nominal dose of flunisolide to the breathing simulator, a similar percentage to previous studies with budesonide and more than previous studies with beclometasone. Drug delivery from the BimboNeb, but not the Nebula, was affected by the simulated breathing pattern. This study suggests that drug delivery from nebulisers is dependent upon the interaction between the nebuliser, the drug and the patient.

Response of preschool children with asthma symptoms to fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND

Many uncertainties remain in the diagnosis and treatment of preschool children with asthma symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the subgroups of preschool children (aged 12-47 months) with recurrent asthma symptoms most likely to respond to inhaled fluticasone propionate (200 microg/d).

METHODS

Subgroups of pooled data from 2 similar 12-week multicenter studies were analyzed.

RESULTS

Children with frequent symptoms (symptoms on > or =3 days per week and a total of > or =75% days with symptoms during the 4-week run-in period; n = 169) showed a significantly greater increase in days without symptoms after fluticasone propionate treatment (0% to 45%) compared with after placebo treatment (0% to 25%, P =.005). Children with a family history of asthma (n = 213) also had a significantly greater increase in days without symptoms after fluticasone propionate (11% to 54%) compared with after placebo (7% to 35%, P =.002) and a significantly higher proportion of exacerbation-free patients (61% to 76%, P =.02). Children with less frequent symptoms, no family history of asthma, or both showed no significant treatment effect. There seemed to be no association between response to fluticasone propionate and history of rhinitis or eczema or the number of previous exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with frequent symptoms, a family history of asthma, or both showed the greatest response to fluticasone propionate treatment. These findings may help to predict treatment outcome and guide the management of preschool children with recurrent asthma symptoms.

Persistent wheezing in infants with an atopic tendency responds to inhaled fluticasone

BACKGROUND

The role of inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of wheeze in infancy remains unclear.

AIM

To investigate the effect of inhaled fluticasone on symptoms in a group of wheezy infants who had a high risk of progressing to childhood asthma.

METHODS

A total of 52 infants, under 1 year of age, with a history of wheeze or cough and a history (personal or first degree relative) of atopy were prescribed either 150 microg fluticasone twice daily (group F) or placebo (group P), via metered dose inhaler, for 12 weeks following a two week run in period. Symptoms were scored in a parent held diary and the mean daily symptom score (MDS) and symptom free days (SFD) calculated for each two week period.

RESULTS

Thirty seven infants completed the study. Both MDS and SFD improved significantly between the run in and final two week period in group F, but not group P, with a mean difference in change (95% CI) between groups of 1.12 (0.05 to 2.18) for MDS and median difference of 3.0 (0.002 to 8.0) for SFD.

CONCLUSION

Improvement of clinical symptoms in response to fluticasone can be shown in this high risk group of infants. In the absence of effective alternatives inhaled corticosteroids should be considered in this patient group.

Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in infancy

The inability to accurately predict the outcome of infants with recurrent wheezy bronchitis makes the early use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) controversial. Data from bronchoalveolar lavages and epidemiological surveys suggest a persistent inflammation of the airways in the more severe cases. Prospective studies, mostly with nebulized corticosteroids, have demonstrated clinical efficacy on daytime and nightime symptoms, reduced requirements for rescue bronchodilators and a real steroid sparing effect. In infants with episodic viral-associated wheeze with or without interval symptoms, ICS use carries the risk of overtreatment and of adverse effects. Long-term prospective studies are urgently required to assess the efficacy and safety of ICS and their possible effects on the natural history of infantile asthma.

Inhaled budesonide for the treatment of acute wheezing and dyspnea in children up to 24 months old receiving intravenous hydrocortisone

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are highly effective in the treatment of asthma at all ages, and their use in younger children is increasing. There are no data currently available on the treatment of infants with acute wheeze and dyspnea with nebulized budesonide.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess the clinical effect of nebulized budesonide in infants with acute wheeze and dyspnea.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed comparing the addition of nebulized budesonide 0.25 mg every 6 hours (group A, n = 32) and nebulized ipratropium bromide 0.1 mg every 6 hours (group B, n = 39) with the normal treatment regimen with intravenous fluid, hydrocortisone, and nebulized fenoterol. A clinical score was made at admission and every 12 hours. The score included wheezing and costal retraction (0-6) and respiratory rate (counts per minute).

RESULTS

Seventy-one infants aged 3 to 24 months were studied (42 boys). A statistically significant reduction was seen in clinical score and respiratory rate in both groups 12 hours after admission. The children who received budesonide improved significantly faster than the children who received ipratropium bromide, and the hospitalization period was significantly lower in the budesonide group (66.4 hours) compared with the ipratropium bromide group (93 hours) (P <.01). Three patients from the budesonide group and 2 from the ipratropium bromide group were readmitted within the first 4 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of infants with acute wheeze with nebulized budesonide is associated with faster clinical improvement and reduction in hospital stay period.

Gastroesophageal reflux in infants with wheezing

The relation between silent gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and respiratory problems such as persistent wheezing in infants is not well-established. Between January 1994 and June 1997, we evaluated the incidence of GER in 84 otherwise healthy infants referred to the Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine Division at Kosair Children's Hospital for evaluation of daily wheezing, and we followed their clinical course for 18 months. All underwent 24-hr esophageal pH studies to evaluate GER. The pH probe study was performed at a mean age of 8.74 +/- 4.6 months. Infants with a positive GER study were treated with an H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and a prokinetic agent for a mean of 5.6 +/- 2.4 months. At first follow-up visit 3 weeks after esophageal pH studies infants treated with an H2RA and those who did not have GER but continued with daily wheezing were started on flunisolide nasal solution (0.025%) delivered by nebulizer (125 mcg t.i.d.). Infants in both groups were followed every 1-2 months for a mean of 18 months and if clinically improved, attempts to decrease their daily asthma medications were made. Fifty-four of 84 (64%) had positive esophageal pH studies (GER-positive group), and 24 of them (44%) had no gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of GER. Thirty patients had normal esophageal pH studies (GER-negative group). Twenty-two of these 30 (73%) infants without GER required nebulized flunisolide, compared to 13 of 54 (24%) infants with GER (P < 0.0005). Thirty-five of 54 (64.8%) infants with GER were able to discontinue all daily asthma medications within 3 months of starting antireflux therapy, while none of the infants without GER were able to discontinue daily asthma medications during the follow-up period (P < 0.0005). We conclude that silent GER is common in infants with daily wheezing, and controlling GER improves morbidity and decreases the need for daily asthma medications.

Six-week trial of nebulized flunisolide nasal spray: efficacy in young children with moderately severe asthma

This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of nebulized flunisolide nasal solution (Nasalide) in young children with moderately severe asthma. Twenty-two asthmatic children, ages 12-72 months, completed this double-blind placebo-controlled study. After a 6-week observation period, 18 patients were paired according to asthma severity. One child from each pair was randomized to flunisolide, the other to placebo; 4 patients were independently randomized. Placebo or drug was then administered for 6 weeks. Throughout the study, symptoms, drug usage, and analog scales reflecting asthma severity and family disruption were recorded in a diary. Multiple regression analysis was used to compare the flunisolide and placebo groups in regard to the amount of improvement demonstrated from the observation to the active periods of the study. Analog scores of asthma severity and family disruption, albuterol aerosol use, and systemic corticosteroid use fell roughly 40% from baseline in the flunisolide group. This improvement was significant compared to the placebo group. We conclude that 1 ml (250 microg) of nebulized flunisolide nasal spray solution, administered three times daily, reduced the severity of asthma symptoms, and the need for both albuterol aerosol and systemic corticosteroid therapy in young children with moderately severe asthma during a 6-week trial. Longer term studies are warranted.

The role of corticosteroids in respiratory diseases of children

Glucocorticosteroids are potent anti-inflammatory agents and have an important role in a variety of respiratory diseases. Although their exact mode of action is unknown, it is thought that they exert their effects by binding to cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptors. In certain conditions, such as asthma, the value of steroids cannot be questioned, and inhaled steroids have revolutionized management. In other situations, such as interstitial lung disease, the true role of steroids is still to be defined. In the management of diseases such as tuberculosis, the use of steroids is solely based on anecdotal experience.