Plasma concentration of itraconazole in patients receiving chemotherapy for hematological malignancies: the effect of famotidine on the absorption of itraconazole

Super Bioavailable Itraconazole and Its Place and Relevance in Recalcitrant Dermatophytosis: Revisiting Skin Levels of Itraconazole and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Data

Itraconazole, is the most commonly prescribed oral antifungal agent in India, and has a low minimum inhibitory concentration as compared to other oral antifungals, and in conjunction with the markedly high skin levels, the drug should have a predictably good clinical response which is not the consistent experience of clinicians. Probably the variation in pelletization parameters might affect the bioavailability of the drug and consequently affect the serum levels. The maximum bioavailability of conventional itraconazole is 55 percent, which is neither consistent nor predictable. However, the novel itraconazole (Super bioavailable Itraconazole) with targeted drug release in the small intestine has predictable serum levels with minimum interindividual variability, which could make it a potentially useful drug in recalcitrant dermatophytosis.

Effects of Food and Omeprazole on a Novel Formulation of Super Bioavailability Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects

To address the limited bioavailability and intolerance of the conventional itraconazole (ITZ) formulations, a new formulation labeled super bioavailability (SUBA) itraconazole has been developed; however, the specific effects of food and gastric pH are unknown. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profile of SUBA itraconazole under fasting and fed conditions, as well as with the concomitant administration of a proton pump inhibitor. First, the effect of food was assessed in an open-label, randomized, crossover bioavailability study of 65-mg SUBA itraconazole capsules (2 65-mg capsules twice a day) in healthy adults (n = 20) under fasting and fed conditions to steady-state levels. Second, an open-label, two-treatment, fixed-sequence comparative bioavailability study in healthy adults (n = 28) under fasted conditions compared the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of SUBA itraconazole capsules (2 65-mg capsules/day) with and without coadministration of daily omeprazole delayed-release capsules (1 40-mg capsule/day) under steady-state conditions. In the fed and fasted states, SUBA itraconazole demonstrated similar concentrations at the end of the dosing interval, with modestly lower total and peak ITZ exposure being shown when it was administered under fed conditions than when it was administered in the fasted state, with fed state/fasted state ratios of 78.09% (90% confidence interval [CI], 74.49 to 81.86%) for the area under the concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (14,183.2 versus 18,479.8 ng · h/ml), 73.05% (90% CI, 69.01 to 77.33%) for the maximum concentration at steady state (1,519.1 versus 2,085.2 ng/ml), and 91.53% (90% CI, 86.41 to 96.96%) for the trough concentration (1,071.5 versus 1,218.5 ng/ml) being found. When dosed concomitantly with omeprazole, there was a 22% increase in the total plasma exposure of ITZ, as measured by the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (P = 0.0069), and a 31% increase in the peak plasma exposure of ITZ, as measured by the maximum concentration (P = 0.0083).

Trough concentration of itraconazole and its relationship with efficacy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The optimum trough concentration of itraconazole for clinical response and safty is controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the optimum trough concentration of itraconazole and evaluate its relationship with efficacy and safety.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Clinical-Trials.gov, and three Chinese literature databases (CNKI, WanFang, and CBM). We included observational studies that compared clinical outcomes below or above the trough concentration cut-off value which we set as 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/L. The efficacy outcomes were rate of successful treatment, rate of prophylaxis failure and invasive fungal infection (IFI)-related mortality. The safety outcomes included incidents of hepatotoxicity and other adverse events.

Results

The study included a total of 29 studies involving 2,346 patients. Our meta-analysis showed that compared with itraconazole trough concentrations (C_trough) of ≥0.25 mg/L, levels of <0.25 mg/L significantly increased the incidence of IFI for prophylaxis (RR =3.279, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73–6.206). Moreover, the success rate of treatment decreased significantly at a cut-off level of 0.5 mg/L (RR =0.396, 95% CI 0.176–0.889). An itraconazole trough level of 1.0 mg/L was associated with hepatotoxicity and other adverse events in a review of many studies.

Conclusion

An itraconazole trough concentration of 0.25 mg/L should be considered as the lower threshold for prophylaxis, and a target concentration of 0.5 mg/L should be the lower limit for effective treatment. A trough level of 1.0 mg/L is associated with increased hepatotoxicity and other adverse events (using High Performance Liquid Chromatography [HPLC]).

CUSP9* treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma: aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, ritonavir, sertraline augmenting continuous low dose temozolomide

CUSP9 treatment protocol for recurrent glioblastoma was published one year ago. We now present a slight modification, designated CUSP9*. CUSP9* drugs--aprepitant, artesunate, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, sertraline, ritonavir, are all widely approved by regulatory authorities, marketed for non-cancer indications. Each drug inhibits one or more important growth-enhancing pathways used by glioblastoma. By blocking survival paths, the aim is to render temozolomide, the current standard cytotoxic drug used in primary glioblastoma treatment, more effective. Although esthetically unpleasing to use so many drugs at once, the closely similar drugs of the original CUSP9 used together have been well-tolerated when given on a compassionate-use basis in the cases that have come to our attention so far. We expect similarly good tolerability for CUSP9*. The combined action of this suite of drugs blocks signaling at, or the activity of, AKT phosphorylation, aldehyde dehydrogenase, angiotensin converting enzyme, carbonic anhydrase -2,- 9, -12, cyclooxygenase-1 and -2, cathepsin B, Hedgehog, interleukin-6, 5-lipoxygenase, matrix metalloproteinase -2 and -9, mammalian target of rapamycin, neurokinin-1, p-gp efflux pump, thioredoxin reductase, tissue factor, 20 kDa translationally controlled tumor protein, and vascular endothelial growth factor. We believe that given the current prognosis after a glioblastoma has recurred, a trial of CUSP9* is warranted.

Management of drug and food interactions with azole antifungal agents in transplant recipients

Azole antifungal agents are frequently used in hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients for prevention or treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, because of metabolism by or substrate activity for various isoenzymes of the cytochrome P450 system and/or P-glycoprotein, azole antifungals have the potential to interact with many of the drugs commonly used in these patient populations. Thus, to identify drug interactions that may result between azole antifungals and other drugs, we conducted a literature search of the MEDLINE database (1966-December 2009) for English-language articles on drug interaction studies involving the azole antifungal agents fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Another literature search between each of the azoles and the immunosuppressants cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus, as well as the corticosteroids methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, prednisolone, and prednisone, was also conducted. Concomitant administration of azoles and immunosuppressive agents may cause clinically significant drug interactions resulting in extreme immunosuppression or toxicity. The magnitude and duration of an interaction between azoles and immunosuppressants are not class effects of the azoles, but differ between drug combinations and are subject to interpatient variability. Drug interactions in the transplant recipient receiving azole therapy may also occur with antibiotics, chemotherapeutic agents, and acid-suppressive therapies, among other drugs. Initiation of an azole antifungal in transplant recipients nearly ensures a drug-drug interaction, but often these drugs are required. Management of these interactions first involves knowledge of the potential drug interaction, appropriate dosage adjustments when necessary, and therapeutic or clinical monitoring at an appropriate point in therapy to assess the drug-drug interaction (e.g., immunosuppressive drug concentrations, signs and symptoms of toxicity). These aspects of drug interaction management are essential not only at the initiation of azole antifungal therapy, but also when these agents are removed from the regimen.

Antifungal treatment of small animal veterinary patients

Antifungal therapy has progressed significantly with the development of new drugs directed at various processes in fungal cell metabolism. Within veterinary medicine, treatment options for systemic mycoses remain limited to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole. However, newer triazoles, echinocandins, and lipid-based formulations of amphotericin B are now approved for use in humans. This article provides a comprehensive review of the antifungal medications available for veterinary patients, and includes a brief discussion of the newer, presently cost-prohibitive, antifungal therapies used for systemic mycoses in humans.

Drug-drug interactions of antifungal agents and implications for patient care

Drug interactions in the gastrointestinal tract, liver and kidneys result from alterations in pH, ionic complexation, and interference with membrane transport proteins and enzymatic processes involved in intestinal absorption, enteric and hepatic metabolism, renal filtration and excretion. Azole antifungals can be involved in drug interactions at all the sites, by one or more of the above mechanisms. Consequently, azoles interact with a vast array of compounds. Drug-drug interactions associated with amphotericin B formulations are predictable and result from the renal toxicity and electrolyte disturbances associated with these compounds. The echinocandins are unknown cytochrome P450 substrates and to date are relatively devoid of significant drug-drug interactions. This article reviews drug interactions involving antifungal agents that affect other agents and implications for patient care are highlighted.

[Fungal infection following reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST)]

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been established as a curative treatment for advanced hematologic malignancies. Transplantation with a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen has been developed, and the minimal toxicity of reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation (RIST) has made this procedure available for patients of advanced age or with organ dysfunction. The response of malignant lymphoma and some solid tumors to RIST has been observed. RIST with unrelated donors and umbilical cord blood has been studied. Fungal infection is an important complication of RIST. Since the prognosis of fungal infection is poor, the management has been focused on its prophylaxis. Given recent progression in RIST management, the strategy of infectious prophylaxis has also changed. Equipment in the hospital is important for fungal infection; however, the median day of the development of fungal infection is day 100, when most patients are followed as outpatients. The focus of fungal management after RIST is oral antifungal agents rather than in-hospital equipment. Various antifungal agents have recently been developed and applied for clinical use, and many of these have been developed simultaneously for the first time. A major change in antifungal management will probably occur in the next several years.

Drug interactions during therapy with three major groups of antimicrobial agents

This review focuses on drug-drug interactions with three major groups of antimicrobial agents: macrolides (including azalides and ketolides), quinolones, which are widely used for the treatment of bacterial infections, and azoles, which are used for antifungal therapy. Macrolides and the ketolide telithromycin are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 and thus interfere with the pharmacokinetics of many other drugs that are metabolised by this enzyme. In contrast, although closely related, azithromycin is not a cytochrome inhibitor. All quinolones form complexes with di- and trivalent cations and, therefore, the absorption of quinolones can be dramatically reduced when given concomitantly with mineral antacids, zinc or iron preparations. Ciprofloxacin exhibits an inhibitory potential for the cytochrome isoenzyme 1A2, resulting in an inhibition of theophylline metabolism. Other quinolones, such as levofloxacin or moxifloxacin, do not interfere with theophylline metabolism. The systemic azoles, such as ketoconazole, itraconazole, fluconazole and voriconazole, are inhibitors of CYP isoenzymes, such as CYP3A4, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, to varying degrees. In addition, some are substrates of the MDR-1 gene product, P-glycoprotein. These features are the basis for most of the interactions occurring during azole therapy (e.g., in severely ill patients in the hospital who are treated with multiple drugs).

Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized?

Adverse drug-drug interactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cancer patients are at particularly high risk of such interactions because they commonly receive multiple medications, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal agents and supportive care drugs. In addition, the majority of cancer patients are elderly, and so require medications for co-morbid conditions such as cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and rheumatological diseases. Furthermore, the age-related decline in hepatic and renal function reduces their ability to metabolize and clear drugs and so increases the potential for toxicity. Not all drug-drug interactions can be predicted, and those that are predictable are not always avoidable. However, increased awareness of the potential for these interactions will allow healthcare providers to minimize the risk by choosing appropriate drugs and also by monitoring for signs of interaction. This review considers the basic principles of drug-drug interactions, and presents specific examples that are relevant to oncology.

A nationwide survey of deep fungal infections and fungal prophylaxis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan

We conducted a nationwide survey to define incidence of deep fungal infections and fungal prophylaxis practices after HSCT. In all, 63 institutions responded. Total number of in-patient transplantations was 935: 367 autologous, 414 allogeneic myeloablative, and 154 allogeneic reduced-intensity (RIST) (n=154). Number of patients who were cared for in a clean room at transplant was 261 (71%) in autologous, 409 (99%) in conventional and 93 (66%) in RIST, respectively. All patients received prophylactic antifungal agents; 89% fluconazole. Number of patients who received the dosage recommended in the CDC guidelines (400 mg/day) was 135 (42%) in conventional transplant and 34 (30%) in RIST (P=0.037). Number of patients who received fluconazole until engraftment and beyond day 75 in conventional transplant vs RIST was, respectively, 324 (100%) vs 109 (97%), and 39 (12%) vs 18 (16%), with no significant difference between the two groups. A total of 37 patients (4.0%) were diagnosed with deep fungal infections; autologous transplantation (0.03%), conventional transplantation (6.0%) and RIST (7.1%). Wide variations in antifungal prophylaxis practice according to the type of transplant and the institutions, and deep fungal infection remain significant problems in RIST.

Oral antifungal drug interactions: a mechanistic approach to understanding their cause

Oral antifungal drugs are generally regarded as effective and safe when used according to their manufacturer's recommendation. However, when an oral antifungal agent is administered with certain interacting agents or classes of drugs, rare severe iatrogenic adverse experiences including death may occur. This article alerts and demystifies some of the clinically significant oral antifungal drug interactions by exploring their underlying pharmacological basis.

Serum levels of fluconazole in patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy for hematological malignancy

We performed a prospective evaluation of pharmacokinetics of fluconazole administered for prophylactic purposes to 19 patients after cytotoxic chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. On days 7 and 15, we obtained 5 ml of blood from each patient. If fluconazole was administered orally, blood samples were drawn 2, 8, and 24 hr after ingestion of the drug. If it was administered intravenously, blood samples were drawn 1, 8, and 24 hr post-injection. Serum fluconazole levels were analyzed by HPLC with ultraviolet light detection. In patients receiving 200 or 400 mg of fluconazole per day, maximal serum levels were 7.9 and 15.6 mg/l and minimum levels were 5.0 and 10.3 mg/l, respectively. There was no significant difference in serum fluconazole levels comparing the levels after oral and intravenous administration, and pharmacokinetic parameters of fluconazole were comparable at each time point within one dose level. However, considerable variation in serum fluconazole levels was noted in this study, as the maximal serum levels ranged from 4.0 to 13.3 mg/l and from 8.7 to 26.9 mg/l in patients receiving 200 and 400 mg of fluconazole orally, respectively. These variations may be associated with prophylactic failures for patients with insufficient fluconazole concentrations. Multiple regression analysis showed significant correlation between serum fluconazole levels and some variables including dose of fluconazole, age, serum aspartate aminotransferase levels and blood urea nitrogen levels. These variations may be associated with disturbance of body water balance, such as massive hemorrhage and dehydration.