Mental Health Services for ‘Difficult’ Women: Reflections on Some Recent Developments

The provision of mental health services to women has come sharply into focus for providers of secure psychiatric services in the UK. Women's services are being developed in response to the known risks of mixed-sex provision, and a growing appreciation of the ways that women in secure services can be further disadvantaged by their minority status. Our intention here is to present evidence and reflections to help inform this development. The evidence is drawn from our recent work in this field, which includes carrying out a review of local mental health services for ‘difficult’ women, and developing and piloting a national training programme for staff working with women in secure services. The reflections we offer are informed by the conviction that taking social inequalities into account is central to making sense of women's mental health difficulties, and improving service responses to women's needs. While there are signs that many mental health workers in secure services are beginning to share these convictions, the challenge now is to provide the necessary authorization, training and support that will enable them to translate these understandings into empowerment practice with women.

Bordering on insanity: misnomer, reviewing the case of condemned women

In the UK, there have been calls to develop gendered specific mental health services for women in an attempt to ensure privacy and dignity are achieved as and when women come into contact with services. This is a largely rhetorical policy objective. There are more fundamental factors affecting women's experience of mental health services that need addressing. This paper explores these issues in the context of mental health care for women who have been 'given' the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Borderline personality disorder effects 2% of the adult population, 75-90% of those diagnosed being women. This diagnosis continues to present considerable conceptual and therapeutic challenges for all of those involved in mental health services and it remains a categorical label that evokes a wide range of conscious and unconscious responses in mental health nurses. The paper argues that mental health nurses need to recognize the defence mechanisms involved in working with individuals who are often difficult to work with. It is only when mental health nurses can embrace and acknowledge the person in the context of their life, that the pejorative and disabling consequences of the BPD label can be eliminated, ensuring the individual's story is heard and not that which is often a pre-constituted account accompanying this diagnosis.