Moses J, Doherty DA, Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. A randomized clinical trial of the intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid volume: amniotic fluid index versus the single deepest pocket technique.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;
190:1564-9; discussion 1569-70. [PMID:
15284736 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.046]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine whether an intrapartum assessment of amniotic fluid identifies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outcome.
STUDY DESIGN
Parturients who were admitted for delivery were assigned randomly to have the amniotic fluid assessed either by amniotic fluid index or by the presence of a 2 x 1 pocket.
RESULTS
The amniotic fluid index was obtained in 499 pregnancies, and the 2 x 1 technique was performed in 501. Oligohydramnios was diagnosed in 25% of amniotic fluid index pregnancies versus 8% with the use of the 2 x 1 pocket technique (P <.001). Both techniques failed to identify patients who underwent an amnioinfusion for fetal distress (P=.864) or who experienced variable (P=.208) or late decelerations (P=.210) that influenced delivery, fetal distress in labor (P=.220), caesarean delivery for fetal distress (P=.133), and admission to neonatal intensive care unit (P=.686).
CONCLUSION
Neither the amniotic fluid index nor the 2 x 1 pocket technique that was undertaken as a fetal admission test identifies a pregnancy that is at risk for an adverse outcome.
Collapse