How do linker histones mediate differential gene expression?

Participation of the TBP-associated factors (TAFs) in cell differentiation

The understanding of the mechanisms that regulate gene expression to establish differentiation programs and determine cell lineages, is one of the major challenges in Developmental Biology. Besides the participation of tissue-specific transcription factors and epigenetic processes, the role of general transcription factors has been ignored. Only in recent years, there have been scarce studies that address this issue. Here, we review the studies on the biological activity of some TATA-box binding protein (TBP)-associated factors (TAFs) during the proliferation of stem/progenitor cells and their involvement in cell differentiation. Particularly, the accumulated evidence suggests that TAF4, TAF4b, TAF7L, TAF8, TAF9, and TAF10, among others, participate in nervous system development, adipogenesis, myogenesis, and epidermal differentiation; while TAF1, TAF7, TAF15 may be involved in the regulation of stem cell proliferative abilities and cell cycle progression. On the other hand, evidence suggests that TBP variants such as TBPL1 and TBPL2 might be regulating some developmental processes such as germ cell maturation and differentiation, myogenesis, or ventral specification during development. Our analysis shows that it is necessary to study in greater depth the biological function of these factors and its participation in the assembly of specific transcription complexes that contribute to the differential gene expression that gives rise to the great diversity of cell types existing in an organism. The understanding of TAFs' regulation might lead to the development of new therapies for patients which suffer from mutations, alterations, and dysregulation of these essential elements of the transcriptional machinery.

Modulation of chromatin function through linker histone H1 variants

In this review, the structural aspects of linker H1 histones are presented as a background for characterization of the factors influencing their function in animal and human chromatin. The action of H1 histone variants is largely determined by dynamic alterations of their intrinsically disordered tail domains, posttranslational modifications and allelic diversification. The interdependent effects of these factors can establish dynamic histone H1 states that may affect the organization and function of chromatin regions.

Oligodendroglioma cells synthesize the differentiation-specific linker histone H1˚ and release it into the extracellular environment through shed vesicles

Chromatin remodelling can be involved in some of the epigenetic modifications found in tumor cells. One of the mechanisms at the basis of chromatin dynamics is likely to be synthesis and incorporation of replacement histone variants, such as the H1° linker histone. Regulation of the expression of this protein can thus be critical in tumorigenesis. In developing brain, H1° expression is mainly regulated at the post-transcriptional level and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are involved. In the past, attention mainly focused on the whole brain or isolated neurons and little information is available on H1° expression in other brain cells. Even less is known relating to tumor glial cells. In this study we report that, like in maturing brain and isolated neurons, H1° synthesis sharply increases in differentiating astrocytes growing in a serum-free medium, while the corresponding mRNA decreases. Unexpectedly, in tumor glial cells both H1° RNA and protein are highly expressed, in spite of the fact that H1° is considered a differentiation-specific histone variant. Persistence of H1° mRNA in oligodendroglioma cells is accompanied by high levels of H1° RNA-binding activities which seem to be present, at least in part, also in actively proliferating, but not in differentiating, astrocytes. Finally, we report that oligodendroglioma cells, but not astrocytes, release H1° protein into the culture medium by shedding extracellular vesicles. These findings suggest that deregulation of H1° histone expression can be linked to tumorigenesis.

Core histone hyperacetylation impacts cooperative behavior and high-affinity binding of histone H1 to chromatin

Linker histones stabilize higher order chromatin structures and limit access to proteins involved in DNA-dependent processes. Core histone acetylation is thought to modulate H1 binding. In the current study, we employed kinetic modeling of H1 recovery curves obtained during fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments to determine the impact of core histone acetylation on the different variants of H1. Following brief treatments with histone deacetylase inhibitor, most variants showed no change in H1 dynamics. A change in mobility was detected only when longer treatments were used to induce high levels of histone acetylation. This hyperacetylation imparted marked changes in the dynamics of low-affinity H1 population, while conferring variant-specific changes in the mobility of H1 molecules that were strongly bound. Both the C-terminal domain (CTD) and globular domain were responsible for this differential response to TSA. Furthermore, we found that neither the CTD nor the globular domain, by themselves, undergoes a change in kinetics following hyperacetylation. This led us to conclude that hyperacetylation of core histones affects the cooperative nature of low-affinity H1 binding, with some variants undergoing a predicted decrease of almost 2 orders of magnitude.

Single-base resolution mapping of H1-nucleosome interactions and 3D organization of the nucleosome

Despite the key role of the linker histone H1 in chromatin structure and dynamics, its location and interactions with nucleosomal DNA have not been elucidated. In this work we have used a combination of electron cryomicroscopy, hydroxyl radical footprinting, and nanoscale modeling to analyze the structure of precisely positioned mono-, di-, and trinucleosomes containing physiologically assembled full-length histone H1 or truncated mutants of this protein. Single-base resolution *OH footprinting shows that the globular domain of histone H1 (GH1) interacts with the DNA minor groove located at the center of the nucleosome and contacts a 10-bp region of DNA localized symmetrically with respect to the nucleosomal dyad. In addition, GH1 interacts with and organizes about one helical turn of DNA in each linker region of the nucleosome. We also find that a seven amino acid residue region (121-127) in the COOH terminus of histone H1 was required for the formation of the stem structure of the linker DNA. A molecular model on the basis of these data and coarse-grain DNA mechanics provides novel insights on how the different domains of H1 interact with the nucleosome and predicts a specific H1-mediated stem structure within linker DNA.

The histone H1 family: specific members, specific functions?

The linker histone H1 binds to the DNA entering and exiting the nucleosomal core particle and has an important role in establishing and maintaining higher order chromatin structures. H1 forms a complex family of related proteins with distinct species, tissue and developmental specificity. In higher eukaryotes all H1 variants have the same general structure, consisting of a central conserved globular domain and less conserved N-terminal and C-terminal tails. These tails are moderately conserved among species, but differ among variants, suggesting a specific function for each H1 variant. Due to compensatory mechanisms and to the lack of proper tools, it has been very difficult to study the biological role of individual variants in chromatin-mediated processes. Our knowledge about H1 variants is indeed limited, and in vitro and in vivo observations have often been contradictory. Therefore, H1 variants were considered to be functionally redundant. However, recent knockout studies and biochemical analyses in different organisms have revealed exciting new insights into the specificity and mechanisms of actions of the H1 family members. Here, we collect and compare the available literature about H1 variants and discuss possible specific roles that challenge the concept of H1 being a mere structural component of chromatin and a general repressor of transcription.

Role of linker histone in chromatin structure and function: H1 stoichiometry and nucleosome repeat length

Despite a great deal of attention over many years, the structural and functional roles of the linker histone H1 remain enigmatic. The earlier concepts of H1 as a general transcriptional inhibitor have had to be reconsidered in the light of experiments demonstrating a minor effect of H1 deletion in unicellular organisms. More recent work analysing the results of depleting H1 in mammals through genetic knockouts of selected H1 subtypes in the mouse has shown that cells and tissues can tolerate a surprisingly low H1 content. One common feature of H1-depleted nuclei is a reduction in nucleosome repeat length (NRL). Moreover, there is a robust linear relationship between H1 stoichiometry and NRL, suggesting an inherent homeostatic mechanism that maintains intranuclear electrostatic balance. It is also clear that the 1 H1 per nucleosome paradigm for higher eukaryotes is the exception rather than the rule. This, together with the high mobility of H1 within the nucleus, prompts a reappraisal of the role of linker histone as an obligatory chromatin architectural protein.

Ubiquitin and control of transcription

Eukaryotic transcription is one of the most complex cellular processes and constitutes the first step in protein synthesis. Ubiquitination and subsequent degradation by the 26 S proteasome, on the other hand, represents the final chapter in the life of a protein. Intriguingly, ubiquitin and the ubiquitin– proteasome system play vital roles in the regulation of transcription. Ubiquitin has dual modus operandi: firstly, ubiquitin functions via the 26 S proteasome — it is tagged to components of the transcription machinery, marking them for degradation via the proteasome, which results in the proper exchange of complexes during transcription and the prompt removal of activators after each round of transcription; and secondly, ubiquitin can function independently of the proteasome — histone ubiquitination results in heterochromatin relaxation and assembly of transcription complexes on the promoter, and ubiquitination of transcription factors enhances their transcriptional-activation function. Although ubiquitin and the ubiquitin–proteasome system were initially perceived as a graveyard for proteins, recent advances in molecular biological techniques have redefined their role as a regulatory system that influences the fate of many cellular processes, such as apoptosis, transcription and cell cycle progression.

NAP1 Modulates Binding of Linker Histone H1 to Chromatin and Induces an Extended Chromatin Fiber Conformation

NAP1 (nucleosome assembly protein 1) is a histone chaperone that has been described to bind predominantly to the histone H2A.H2B dimer in the cell during shuttling of histones into the nucleus, nucleosome assembly/remodeling, and transcription. Here it was examined how NAP1 interacts with chromatin fibers isolated from HeLa cells. NAP1 induced a reversible change toward an extended fiber conformation as demonstrated by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation experiments. This transition was due to the removal of the linker histone H1. The H2A.H2B dimer remained stably bound to the native fiber fragments and to fibers devoid of linker histone H1. This was in contrast to mononucleosome substrates, which displayed a NAP1-induced removal of a single H2A.H2B dimer from the core particle. The effect of NAP1 on the chromatin fiber structure was examined by scanning/atomic force microscopy. A quantitative image analysis of approximately 36,000 nucleosomes revealed an increase of the average internucleosomal distance from 22.3 +/- 0.4 to 27.6 +/- 0.6 nm, whereas the overall fiber structure was preserved. This change reflects the disintegration of the chromatosome due to binding of H1 to NAP1 as chromatin fibers stripped from H1 showed an average nucleosome distance of 27.4 +/- 0.8 nm. The findings suggest a possible role of NAP1 in chromatin remodeling processes involved in transcription and replication by modulating the local linker histone content.

How to make an egg: transcriptional regulation in oocytes

The oocyte is a highly differentiated cell. It makes organelles specialized to its unique functions and progresses through a series of developmental stages to acquire a fertilization competent phenotype. This review will integrate the biology of the oocyte with what is known about oocyte-specific gene regulation and transcription factors involved in oocyte development. We propose that oogenesis is reliant on a dynamic gene regulatory network that includes oocyte-specific transcriptional regulators.

The C-terminal domain is the primary determinant of histone H1 binding to chromatin in vivo

We have used a combination of kinetic measurements and targeted mutations to show that the C-terminal domain is required for high-affinity binding of histone H1 to chromatin, and phosphorylations can disrupt binding by affecting the secondary structure of the C terminus. By measuring the fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching profiles of green fluorescent protein-histone H1 proteins in living cells, we find that the deletion of the N terminus only modestly reduces binding affinity. Deletion of the C terminus, however, almost completely eliminates histone H1.1 binding. Specific mutations of the C-terminal domain identified Thr-152 and Ser-183 as novel regulatory switches that control the binding of histone H1.1 in vivo. It is remarkable that the single amino acid substitution of Thr-152 with glutamic acid was almost as effective as the truncation of the C terminus to amino acid 151 in destabilizing histone H1.1 binding in vivo. We found that modifications to the C terminus can affect histone H1 binding dramatically but have little or no influence on the charge distribution or the overall net charge of this domain. A comparison of individual point mutations and deletion mutants, when reviewed collectively, cannot be reconciled with simple charge-dependent mechanisms of C-terminal domain function of linker histones.

H1 linker histones are essential for mouse development and affect nucleosome spacing in vivo

Most eukaryotic cells contain nearly equimolar amounts of nucleosomes and H1 linker histones. Despite their abundance and the potential functional specialization of H1 subtypes in multicellular organisms, gene inactivation studies have failed to reveal essential functions for linker histones in vivo. Moreover, in vitro studies suggest that H1 subtypes may not be absolutely required for assembly of chromosomes or nuclei. By sequentially inactivating the genes for three mouse H1 subtypes (H1c, H1d, and H1e), we showed that linker histones are essential for mammalian development. Embryos lacking the three H1 subtypes die by mid-gestation with a broad range of defects. Triple-H1-null embryos have about 50% of the normal ratio of H1 to nucleosomes. Mice null for five of these six H1 alleles are viable but are underrepresented in litters and are much smaller than their littermates. Marked reductions in H1 content were found in certain tissues of these mice and in another compound H1 mutant. These results demonstrate that the total amount of H1 is crucial for proper embryonic development. Extensive reduction of H1 in certain tissues did not lead to changes in nuclear size, but it did result in global shortening of the spacing between nucleosomes.

Structure and expression of the human oocyte-specific histone H1 gene elucidated by direct RT-nested PCR of a single oocyte

Oocyte-specific histone H1 is expressed during oogenesis and early embryogenesis. It has been described in mice and some nonmammalian species, but not in humans. Here, we identified the cDNA in unfertilized human oocytes using direct RT-nested PCR of a single cell. Sequencing of this cDNA indicated an open reading frame encoding a 347-amino acid protein. Expression was oocyte-specific. Homology was closest with the corresponding gene of mouse (H1oo; 42.3%), and, to lesser extent, with that of Xenopus laevis (B4; 25.0%). The gene, named osH1, included five exons as predicted by the NCBI annotation project of the human genome, although the actual splicing site at the 3(') end of exon 3 was different by 48 nucleotides from the prediction. The presence of polyadenylation signals and successful amplification of cDNA by RT-PCR using an oligo(dT) primer suggested that the osH1 mRNA is polyadenylated unlike somatic H1 mRNA. Our technique and findings should facilitate investigation of human fertilization and embryogenesis.

TE2 and TE1 sub-elements of the testis-specific histone H1t promoter are functionally different

The testis-specific linker histone H1t gene is transcribed exclusively in pachytene primary spermatocytes. Tissue specific expression of the gene is mediated in part by transcriptional factors that bind elements located within the proximal and distal promoter. A 40 bp promoter element, designated H1t/TE, that is located within the proximal promoter between the CCAAT-box and AC-box, is known to be essential for H1t gene transcription in transgenic animals. In the present study, we show by SDS-PAGE analysis of UV crosslinked protein and DNA and by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) of testis nuclear proteins separated on a non-denaturing glycerol gradient that the TE1 sub-element is bound by a protein complex. Mutation of TE1 leads to a drop in H1t promoter activity in germinal GC-2spd cells as well as in nongerminal Leydig, NIH3T3, and C127I cell lines. Although TE1 and TE2 sub-elements have similar sequences, mutation of the TE2 sub-element causes an increase in promoter activity in C127I and Leydig cells. The rat TE1 but not TE2 contains a CpG dinucleotide and this cytosine is methylated in liver but not in primary spermatocytes. Methylation of the cytosine at this site almost eliminates nuclear protein binding. Thus, there are significant functional differences in the TE2 and TE1 sub-elements of the H1t promoter with TE1 serving as a transcriptional activator binding site and TE2 serving as a repressor binding site in some cell lines.

Histone H1 enhances synergistic activation of the MMTV promoter in chromatin

Minichromosomes assembled on the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter in vitro exhibit positioned nucleosomes, one of which covers the binding sites for progesterone receptor (PR) and nuclear factor 1 (NF1). Incorporation of histone H1 into MMTV minichromosomes improves the stability of this nucleosome and decreases basal transcription from the MMTV promoter, as well as its response to either PR or NF1. However, histone H1-containing minichromosomes display better PR binding and support a more efficient synergism between PR and NF1, leading to enhanced transcription initiation. A mutant MMTV promoter lacking positioned nucleosomes does not display enhanced transcriptional synergism in the presence of H1. Binding of PR leads to phosphorylation of H1, which leaves the promoter upon transcription initiation. Thus, H1 assumes a complex and dynamic role in the regulation of the MMTV promoter.

Regulation of prothymosin alpha by estrogen receptor alpha: molecular mechanisms and relevance in estrogen-mediated breast cell growth

Prothymosin alpha (PTalpha) is a small highly acidic protein found in the nuclei of virtually all mammalian tissues. Its high conservation in mammals and wide tissue distribution suggest an essential biological role. While the exact mechanism of action of PTalpha remains elusive, the one constant has been its relationship with the proliferative state of the cell and its requirement for cellular growth and survival. Recently PTalpha was found to promote transcriptional activity by sequestering the anticoactivator, REA from the Estrogen Receptor (ER) complex. We now report that Estradiol (E2) upregulates PTalpha mRNA and protein expression. Further studies indicate that ERalpha regulates PTalpha gene transcriptional activity. We have also delimited the region of PTalpha gene promoter involved in ERalpha-mediated transcriptional regulation and identified a novel ERalpha-binding element. Increased intracellular PTalpha expression in the presence of estrogens is accompanied by increased nuclear/decreased cytoplasmic localization. Increased nuclear expression of PTalpha is correlated with increased proliferation as measured by expression of Ki67 nuclear antigen. Conversely, inhibition of nuclear PTalpha expression in breast cancer cells using antisense methodology resulted in the inhibition of E2-induced breast cancer cell proliferation. Overall these studies underscore the importance of PTalpha in estrogen-induced breast cell proliferation.

Conformational dynamics of the chromatin fiber in solution: determinants, mechanisms, and functions

Chromatin fibers are dynamic macromolecular assemblages that are intimately involved in nuclear function. This review focuses on recent advances centered on the molecular mechanisms and determinants of chromatin fiber dynamics in solution. Major points of emphasis are the functions of the core histone tail domains, linker histones, and a new class of proteins that assemble supramolecular chromatin structures. The discussion of important structural issues is set against a background of possible functional significance.

Nuclear receptor-dependent transcription with chromatin. Is it all about enzymes?

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-regulated, DNA-binding transcription factors that function in the chromatin environment of the nucleus to alter the expression of subsets of hormone-responsive genes. It is clear that chromatin, rather than being a passive player, has a profound effect on both transcriptional repression and activation mediated by NRs. NRs act in conjunction with at least three general classes of cofactors to regulate transcription in the context of chromatin: (a) chromatin remodelers; (b) corepressors; and (c) coactivators, many of which have distinct enzymatic activities that remodel nucleosomes or covalently modify histones (e.g. acetylases, deacetylases, methyltransferases, and kinases). In this paper, we will present a brief overview of these enzymes, their activities, and how they assist NRs in the repression or activation of transcription in the context of chromatin.

Histone H1 represses estrogen receptor alpha transcriptional activity by selectively inhibiting receptor-mediated transcription initiation

Chromatin is the physiological template for many nuclear processes in eukaryotes, including transcription by RNA polymerase II. In vivo, chromatin is assembled from genomic DNA, core histones, linker histones such as histone H1, and nonhistone chromatin-associated proteins. Histone H1 is thought to act as a general repressor of transcription by promoting the compaction of chromatin into higher-order structures. We have used a biochemical approach, including an in vitro chromatin assembly and transcription system, to examine the effects of histone H1 on estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha)-mediated transcription with chromatin templates. We show that histone H1 acts as a potent repressor of ligand- and coactivator-regulated transcription by ER alpha. Histone H1 exerts its repressive effect without inhibiting the sequence-specific binding of ER alpha to chromatin or the overall extent of targeted acetylation of nucleosomal histones by the coactivator p300. Instead, histone H1 acts by blocking a specific step in the ER alpha-dependent transcription process, namely, transcription initiation, without affecting transcription reinitiation. Together, our data indicate that histone H1 acts selectively to reduce the overall level of productive transcription initiation by restricting promoter accessibility and preventing the ER alpha-dependent formation of a stable transcription pre-initiation complex.

DNA-induced alpha-helical structure in the NH2-terminal domain of histone H1

It is important to establish the structural properties of linker histones to understand the role they play in chromatin higher order structure and gene regulation. Here, we use CD, NMR, and IR spectroscopy to study the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees, free in solution and bound to the DNA. The NH(2)-terminal domain has little structure in aqueous solution, but it acquires a substantial amount of alpha-helical structure in the presence of trifluoroethanol (TFE). As in other H1 subtypes, the basic residues of the NH(2)-terminal domain of histone H1 degrees are clustered in its COOH-terminal half. According to the NMR results, the helical region comprises the basic cluster (Lys(11)-Lys(20)) and extends until Asp(23). The fractional helicity of this region in 90% TFE is about 50%. His(24) together with Pro(25) constitute the joint between the NH(2)-terminal helix and helix I of the globular domain. Infrared spectroscopy shows that interaction with the DNA induces an amount of alpha-helical structure equivalent to that observed in TFE. As coulombic interactions are involved in complex formation, it is highly likely in the complexes with DNA that the minimal region with alpha-helical structure is that containing the basic cluster. In chromatin, the high positive charge density of the inducible NH(2)-terminal helical element may contribute to the binding stability of the globular domain.

Histone variants and histone modifications: A structural perspective

In this review, we briefly analyze the current state of knowledge on histone variants and their posttranslational modifications. We place special emphasis on the description of the structural component(s) defining and determining their functional role. The information available indicates that this histone "variability" may operate at different levels: short-range "local" or long-range "global", with different functional implications. Recent work on this topic emphasizes an earlier notion that suggests that, in many instances, the functional response to histone variability is possibly the result of a synergistic structural effect.Key words: histone variants, posttranslational modifications, chromatin.

Hormone-mediated dephosphorylation of specific histone H1 isoforms

We have previously shown a connection between histone H1 phosphorylation and the transcriptional competence of the hormone inducible mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter. Prolonged exposure of mouse cells to dexamethasone concurrently dephosphorylated histone H1 and rendered the MMTV promoter refractory to hormonal stimulation and, therefore, transcriptionally unresponsive. Using electrospray mass spectrometry, we demonstrate here that prolonged dexamethasone treatment differentially effects a subset of the six somatic H1 isoforms in mouse cells. H1 isoforms H1.0, H1.1, and H1.2 are non-responsive to hormone whereas prolonged dexamethasone treatment effectively dephosphorylated the H1.3, H1.4, and H1.5 isoforms. The protein kinase inhibitor staurosporine, shown to dephosphorylate histone H1 and down-regulate MMTV in cultured cells, appears only to completely dephosphorylate the H1.3 isoform. These results suggest that dephosphorylation of specific histone H1 isoforms may contribute to the previously observed decrease in transcriptional competence of the MMTV promoter through the modulation of chromatin structure. In a broader sense, this work advances the hypothesis that post-translational modifications of individual histone H1 isoforms directly influence the transcriptional activation/repression of specific genes.

Induction of secondary structure in a COOH-terminal peptide of histone H1 by interaction with the DNA: an infrared spectroscopy study

We have studied the conformation of the peptide Ac-EPKRSVAFKKTKKEVKKVATPKK (CH-1), free in solution and bound to the DNA, by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The peptide belongs to the COOH-terminal domain of histone H1(0) (residues 99-121) and is adjacent to the central globular domain of the protein. In aqueous (D(2)O) solution the amide I' is dominated by component bands at 1643 cm(-1) and 1662 cm(-1), which have been assigned to random coil conformations and turns, respectively. In accordance with previous NMR results, the latter component has been interpreted as arising in turn-like conformations in rapid equilibrium with unfolded states. The peptide becomes fully structured either in 90% trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution or upon interaction with the DNA. In these conditions, the contributions of turn (1662 cm(-1)) and random coil components virtually disappear. In TFE, the spectrum is dominated by the alpha-helical component (1654 cm(-1)). The band at 1662 cm(-1) shifts to 1670 cm(-1), and has been assigned to the COOH-terminal TPKK motif in a more stable turn conformation. A band at 1637 cm(-1), also present in TFE, has been assigned to 3(10) helical structure. The amide I' band of the complexes with the DNA retains the components that were attributed to 3(10) helix and the TPKK turn. In the complexes with the DNA, the alpha-helical component observed in TFE splits into two components at 1657 cm(-1) and 1647 cm(-1). Both components are inside the spectral region of alpha-helical structures. Our results support the presence of inducible helical and turn elements, both sharing the character of DNA-binding motifs.

Histone H1 diversity: bridging regulatory signals to linker histone function

Genes encoding linker histone variants have evolved to link their expression to signals controlling the proliferative capacities of cells, i.e. cycling and growth-arrested cells express distinct and specific H1 subtypes. In metazoan, these variants show a tripartite structure, with considerably divergent sequences in their amino and carboxyl terminus domains. The aim of this review is to show how specific regulatory signals control the expression of an individual H1 and to discuss the functional significance of the two variables associated with a linker histone: its primary sequence and the timing of its expression.

Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated chromatin remodeling in vivo

The compaction of DNA into chromatin provides an additional level of gene regulation in eukaryotes that may not be available to prokaryotes. When packaged as chromatin, most promoters are transcriptionally repressed, and transcription factors have reduced access to their binding sites. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates the activity of genes involved in many physiological processes. To regulate eukaryotic genes, the GR binds to target sites within promoter regions of genes assembled as chromatin. This interaction alters the nucleosomal architecture to allow binding of other transcription factors, and formation of the preinitiation complex. The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter has been used extensively as a model to explore the processes by which the GR remodels chromatin and activates transcription. Significant progress has been made in our understanding of the mechanisms used by the GR to modify chromatin structure, and the limits placed on the GR by post-translational modifications of histones. We will describe recent developments in the processes used by the GR to activate transcription in vivo via chromatin remodeling complexes, histone H1 phosphorylation, and recruitment of diverse coactivators.

A mammalian oocyte-specific linker histone gene H1oo: homology with the genes for the oocyte-specific cleavage stage histone (cs-H1) of sea urchin and the B4/H1M histone of the frog

Oocytes and early embryos of multiple (non-mammalian) species lack the somatic form of the linker histone H1. To the best of our knowledge, a mammalian oocyte-specific linker (H1) histone(s) has not, as yet, been reported. We have uncovered the cDNA in question in the course of a differential screening (suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH)) project. Elucidation of the full-length sequence of this novel 1.2 kb cDNA led to the identification of a 912 bp open reading frame. The latter encoded a novel 34 kDa linker histone protein comprised of 304 amino acids, tentatively named H1oo. Amino acid BLAST analysis revealed that H1oo displayed the highest sequence homology to the oocyte-specific B4 histone of the frog, the respective central globular (putative DNA binding) domains displaying 54% identity. Substantial homology to the cs-H1 protein of the sea urchin oocyte was also apparent. While most oocytic mRNAs corresponding to somatic linker histones are not polyadenylated (and remain untranslated), the mRNAs of (non-mammalian) oocyte-specific linker histones and of mammalian H1oo, are polyadenylated, a process driven by the consensus signal sequence, AAUAAA, detected in the 3′-untranslated region of the H1oo cDNA. Our data suggest that the mouse oocyte-specific linker histone H1oo (1) constitutes a novel mammalian homolog of the oocyte-specific linker histone B4 of the frog and of the cs-H1 linker histone of the sea urchin; (2) is expressed as early as the GV (PI) stage oocyte, persisting into the MII stage oocyte, the oocytic polar bodies, and the two-cell embryo, extinction becoming apparent at the four- to eight-cell embryonic stage; and (3) may play a key role in the control of gene expression during oogenesis and early embryogenesis, presumably through the perturbation of chromatin structure.

Nuclear compartmentalization and gene activity

The regulated expression of genes during development and differentiation is influenced by the availability of regulatory proteins and accessibility of the DNA to the transcriptional apparatus. There is growing evidence that the transcriptional activity of genes is influenced by nuclear organization, which itself changes during differentiation. How do these changes in nuclear organization help to establish specific patterns of gene expression?

Are linker histones (histone H1) dispensable for survival?

In the multicelled filamentous ascomycete Ascolobus immersus, the single copy gene for histone H1 can be silenced by methylation in the process known as methylation-induced premeiotically (MIP). The results of a recent paper using this unique system(1) have shown that histone H1 silencing results in an enhanced DNA accessibility to nucleases and an increase in the overall extent of DNA methylation. Interestingly, while none of these effects appear to decrease the immediate viability of this fungus, silencing of histone H1 results in a significant decrease in its overall life span. These results suggest that while linker histones may be dispensable for the relatively short life span of an individual cell, they are most likely indispensable for survival of higher eukaryote organisms.

Linker histone binding and displacement: versatile mechanism for transcriptional regulation

In recent years, the connection between chromatin structure and its transcriptional activity has attracted considerable experimental effort. The post-translational modifications to both the core histones and the linker histones are finely tuned through interactions with transcriptional regulators and change chromatin structure in a way to allow transcription to occur. Here we review evidence for the involvement of linker histones in transcriptional regulation and suggest a scenario in which the reversible and controllable binding/displacement of proteins of this class to the nucleosome entry/exit point determine the accessibility of the nucleosomal DNA to the transcriptional machinery.