Long-term clinical follow-up of patients treated with the coronary rotablator: a single-center experience

Sex differences in procedural and clinical outcomes following rotational atherectomy

AIM

Evaluate sex differences in procedural net adverse clinical events and long-term outcomes following rotational atherectomy (RA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From August 2010 to 2016, 765 consecutive patients undergoing RA PCI were followed up for a median of 4.7 years. 285 (37%) of subjects were female. Women were older (mean 76 years vs. 72 years; p < .001) and had more urgent procedures (64.6 vs. 47.3%; p < .001). Females received fewer radial procedures (75.1 vs. 85.1%; p < .001) and less intravascular imaging guidance (16.8 vs. 25.0%; p = .008). After propensity score adjustment, the primary endpoint of net adverse cardiac events (net adverse clinical events: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization plus any procedural complication) occurred more often in female patients (15.1 vs. 9.0%; adjusted OR 1.81 95% CI 1.04-3.13; p = .037). This was driven by an increased risk of procedural complications rather than procedural major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Specifically, women were more likely to experience coronary dissection (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = .008), cardiac tamponade (2.1 vs. 0.4%; p = .046) and significant bleeding (BARC ≥2: 5.3 vs. 2.3). Despite this, overall MACE-free survival was similar between males and females (adjusted HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.80-1.34; p = .81). Procedural complications during RA were associated with almost double the incidence of MACE at long-term follow-up (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.34-2.77; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Women may be at greater risk of procedural complications following rotational atherectomy. These include periprocedural bleeding episodes and coronary perforation leading to cardiac tamponade. Despite this, the adjusted overall long-term survival free of major adverse cardiac events was similar between males and females.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in heavily calcified lesions using rotational atherectomy and paclitaxel-eluting stents: outcomes at one year

Heavily calcified lesions present a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. With rotational atherectomy, it is possible to treat these lesions and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) reduce the risk of restenosis over the long term. This retrospective study investigated clinical outcomes with rotational atherectomy and PESs in 50 consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions. Mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year (median, 14 months; interquartile range, 8.75-25.5 months) were recorded. Some 52% of patients were aged over 70 years, 68% were male, 52% had acute coronary syndrome, 80% had multivessel disease and 44% were receiving abciximab. Two patients died in hospital, three died during follow-up (one cardiac death) and 3 (6%) underwent target lesion revascularization. At 1 year, the survival rate free of cardiac death was 94% and the survival rate free of target lesion revascularization was 94%. These findings demonstrate that the combination of rotational atherectomy and PESs gives excellent results in heavily calcified lesions.

An evidence-based approach to the use of rotational and directional coronary atherectomy in the era of drug-eluting stents: when does it make sense?

Advances in percutaneous interventions have profoundly changed the way we manage patients with coronary and peripheral arterial disease. Though the use of stents, particularly drug-eluting stents, is the preferred method for revascularization because of ease of use and lower restenosis rates, there are many short comings. Ostial and bifurcation lesions as well as heavily calcified and tortuous arteries remain problematic. Mechanical debulking with rotational and direct coronary atherectomy may be beneficial in these situations. In this review, we present the general concepts of mechanical debulking and attempt to summarize the available data on its use in the setting of drug-eluting stents. In addition, we will discuss its special role in the management of peripheral arterial disease.

Rotational atherectomy in the distal left anterior descending coronary artery through an internal mammary artery graft

We report the case of a 53-year-old white man who began complaining of dyspnoea and angina 19 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Coronary angiography revealed the presence of a long and critical stenosis in the native left anterior descending coronary artery, shortly after distal anastomosis of the left internal mammary artery. After failed predilatations with standard or cutting balloons, we successfully used the rotablator system, which allowed us to implant a bare-metal stent in the native left anterior descending coronary artery. However, stent deployment caused long linear graft dissection, which was reduced by drug-eluting stent implantation in the proximal and distal segments of the left internal mammary artery.

Coronary angioplasty and Rotablator atherectomy trial (CARAT): immediate and late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial

Mechanical rotational atherectomy with the Rotablator is widely used for percutaneous coronary revascularization, but the ideal debulking strategy remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate and late results after Rotablator using two treatment strategies: Large burrs (burr/artery ratio of >0.7) to achieve maximal debulking (lesion debulking strategy) or small burrs (burr/artery ratio < or = 0.7) to modify lesion compliance (lesion modification strategy). Two hundred twenty-two patients at six centers were prospectively enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to large (n = 104 patients with 118 lesions) or small (n = 118 patients with 136 lesions) burrs. The primary endpoint was final diameter stenosis at the end of the procedure, and secondary endpoints included inhospital angiographic and clinical complications, and target lesion revascularization at 6 months. Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar. There were no differences in procedural success, the extent of immediate lumen enlargement, inhospital ischemic complications, or late target vessel revascularization. However, compared with small burrs, patients randomized to large burrs were more likely to experience serious angiographic complications (5.1% vs. 12.7%, P < 0.05) immediately after atherectomy. This study suggests that a routine lesion modification strategy employing small burrs (burr/artery ratio < or = 0.7) achieves similar immediate lumen enlargement and late target vessel revascularization compared with a more aggressive debulking strategy (burr/artery ratio >0.7), but with fewer angiographic complications.

Treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease by high-speed rotational atherectomy: initial and mid-term results

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and patency rates of high-speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During an 18-month period, a total of 19 infrapopliteal lesions in 15 consecutive patients were treated primarily by HSRA with use of the Rotablator device. Patients were followed up with documentation of clinical symptoms, standardized treadmill exercise, and Doppler sonography at 1, 3, and 6 months. Control angiography was performed 6 months after primary treatment.

RESULTS

HSRA was initially successful in 14 of 15 patients, yielding an initial technical success rate of 94%. Percutaneous treatment induced an improvement of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) from 0.6 +/- 0.09 to 0.86 +/- 0.2 after intervention (P < .0001). Doppler analysis showed a mean ABI of 0.85 +/- 0.2 (P < .001) at 1 month, 0.72 +/- 0.2 (P = .012) at 3 months, and 0.7 +/- 0.2 (P = .08) at 6 months after initial therapy. Although six patients were lost to follow-up at various times, control angiography at 6 months was carried out in nine of 15 patients, allowing direct assessment of 12 of 19 treated lesions. Among six high-grade restenoses and five total occlusions in the treated vascular segments, only one arterial lumen (of 12) remained patent without presenting a hemodynamically relevant restenosis. These results led to termination of the study.

CONCLUSION

Although HSRA for the treatment of infrapopliteal occlusive disease yields a very high initial technical success rate, mid-term results are extremely poor. Therefore, HSRA cannot be recommended for primary treatment of this type of lesion.