Use of Proteasome Inhibitors

Inhibitors of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System block myofibril assembly in cardiomyocytes derived from chick embryos and human pluripotent stem cells

Details of sarcomeric protein assembly during de novo myofibril formation closely resemble myofibrillogenesis in skeletal and cardiac myocytes in birds, rodents and zebrafish. The arrangement of proteins during myofibrillogenesis follows a three-step process: beginning with premyofibrils, followed by nascent myofibrils, and concluding with mature myofibrils (reviewed in Sanger et al., 2017). Our aim is to determine if the same pathway is followed in human cardiomyocytes derived from human inducible pluripotent stem cells. We found that the human cardiomyocytes developed patterns of protein organization identical to the three-step series seen in the model organisms cited above. Further experiments showed that myofibril assembly can be blocked at the nascent myofibril by five different inhibitors of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) stage in both avian and human cardiomyocytes. With the exception of Carfilzomib, removal of the UPS inhibitors allows nascent myofibrils to proceed to mature myofibrils. Some proteasomal inhibitors, such as Bortezomib and Carfilzomib, used to treat multiple myeloma patients, have off-target effects of damage to hearts in three to six percent of these patients. These cardiovascular adverse events may result from prevention of mature myofibril formation in the cardiomyocytes. In summary, our results support a common three-step model for the formation of myofibrils ranging from avian to human cardiomyocytes. The Ubiquitin Proteasome System is required for progression from nascent myofibrils to mature myofibrils. Our experiments suggest a possible explanation for the cardiac and skeletal muscle off-target effects reported in multiple myeloma patients treated with proteasome inhibitors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The von Hippel-Lindau Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase regulates APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases

The 7 members of the A3 family of cytidine deaminases (A3A to A3H) share a conserved catalytic activity that converts cytidines in single-stranded (ss) DNA into uridines, thereby inducing mutations. After their initial identification as cell-intrinsic defenses against HIV and other retroviruses, A3s were also found to impair many additional viruses. Moreover, some of the A3 proteins (A3A, A3B, and A3H haplotype I) are dysregulated in cancer cells, thereby causing chromosomal mutations that can be selected to fuel progression of malignancy. Viral mechanisms that increase transcription of A3 genes or induce proteasomal degradation of A3 proteins have been characterized. However, only a few underlying biological mechanisms regulating levels of A3s in uninfected cells have been described. Here, we characterize that the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor (pVHL), via its CRL^pVHL, induces degradation of all 7 A3 proteins. Two independent lines of evidence supported the conclusion that the multiprotein CRL^pVHL complex is necessary for A3 degradation. CRL^pVHL more effectively induced degradation of nuclear, procancer A3 (A3B) than the cytoplasmic, antiretroviral A3 (A3G). These results identify specific cellular factors that regulate A3s post-translationally.

Effect of MG-132 on myofibrillogenesis and the ubiquitination of GAPDH in quail myotubes

In the three-step myofibrillogenesis model, mature myofibrils are formed through two intermediate structures: premyofibrils and nascent myofibrils. We have recently reported that several inhibitors of the Ubiquitin Proteosome System, for example, MG-132, and DBeQ, reversibly block progression of nascent myofibrils to mature myofibrils. In this investigation, we studied the effects of MG132 and DBeQ on the expression of various myofibrillar proteins including actin, myosin light and heavy chains, tropomyosin, myomesin, and myosin binding protein-C in cultured embryonic quail myotubes by western blotting using two loading controls-α-tubulin and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Surprisingly, we found that MG-132 affected the level of expression of GAPDH but DBeQ did not. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed no significant effect of MG-132 on GAPDH transcription. Two-dimensional (2D) western blot analyses with extracts of control and MG-132-treated cells using anti-ubiquitin antibody indicated that MG132-treated myotubes show a stronger emitter-coupled logic signal. However, Spot% and Spot volume calculations for all spots from both western blot film signals and matched Coomassie-stained 2D polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that the intensity of staining in a spot of ~39 kDa protein is 3.5-fold lower in the gel of MG-132-treated extracts. Mass spectrometry analyses identified the ~39 kDa protein as quail GAPDH. Immunohistochemical analysis of fixed MG-132-treated myotubes with anti-GAPDH antibody showed extensive clump formation, which may be analogous to granule formation by stress response factors in MG132-treated cells. This is the first report on in vivo ubiquitination of GAPDH. This may be essential for the moonlighting (Jeffery, 1999) activity of GAPDH for tailoring stress in myotubes.

Myofibril assembly and the roles of the ubiquitin proteasome system

De novo assembly of myofibrils in vertebrate cross-striated muscles progresses in three distinct steps, first from a minisarcomeric alignment of several nonmuscle and muscle proteins in premyofibrils, followed by insertions of additional proteins and increased organization in nascent myofibrils, ending with mature contractile myofibrils. In a search for controls of the process of myofibril assembly, we discovered that the transition from nascent to mature myofibrils could be halted by inhibitors of three distinct functions of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). First, inhibition of pathway to E3 Cullin ligases that ubiquitinate proteins led to an arrest of myofibrillogenesis at the nascent myofibril stage. Second, inhibition of p97 protein extractions of ubiquitinated proteins led to a similar arrest of myofibrillogenesis at the nascent myofibril stage. Third, inhibitors of proteolytic action by proteasomes also blocked nascent myofibrils from transitioning to mature myofibrils. In contrast, inhibitors of autophagy or lysosomes did not affect myofibrillogenesis. To probe for differences in the effects of UPS inhibitors during myofibrillogenesis, we analyzed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching the exchange rates of two selected sarcomeric proteins (muscle myosin II heavy chains and light chains). In the presence of p97 and proteasomal inhibitors, the dynamics of each of these two myosin proteins decreased in the nascent myofibril stage, but were unaffected in the mature myofibril stage. The increased stability of myofibrils occurring in the transition from nascent to mature myofibril assembly indicates the importance of dynamics and selective destruction in the muscle myosin II proteins for the remodeling of nascent to mature myofibrils.

Induction of apoptosis via proteasome inhibition in leukemia/lymphoma cells by two potent piperidones

PURPOSE

Previously, compounds containing a piperidone structure have been shown to be highly cytotoxic to cancer cells. Recently, we found that the piperidone compound P2 exhibits a potent anti-neoplastic activity against human breast cancer-derived cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate two piperidone compounds, P1 and P2, for their potential anti-neoplastic activity against human leukemia/lymphoma-derived cells.

METHODS

Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction were evaluated using MTS, annexin V-FITC/PI and mitochondrial membrane potential polychromatic assays to confirm the mode of action of the piperidone compounds. The effects of compound P1 and P2 treatment on gene expression were assessed using AmpliSeq analysis and, subsequently, confirmed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting.

RESULTS

We found that the two related piperidone compounds P1 and P2 selectively killed the leukemia/lymphoma cells tested at nanomolar concentrations through induction of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, as demonstrated by mitochondrial depolarization and caspase-3 activation. AmpliSeq-based transcriptome analyses of the effects of compounds P1 and P2 on HL-60 acute leukemia cells revealed a differential expression of hundreds of genes, 358 of which were found to be affected by both. Additional pathway analyses revealed that a significant number of the common genes were related to the unfolded protein response, implying a possible role of the two compounds in the induction of proteotoxic stress. Subsequent analyses of the transcriptome data revealed that P1 and P2 induced similar gene expression alterations as other well-known proteasome inhibitors. Finally, we found that Noxa, an important mediator of the activity of proteasome inhibitors, was significantly upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels, indicating a possible role in the cytotoxic mechanism induced by P1 and P2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the cytotoxic activity of P1 and P2 on leukemia/lymphoma cells is mediated by proteasome inhibition, leading to activation of pro-apoptotic pathways.

Milder degenerative effects of Carfilzomib vs. Bortezomib in the Drosophila model: a link to clinical adverse events

Proteasome inhibitors, e.g. Bortezomib (BTZ) and Carfilzomib (CFZ), have demonstrated clinical efficacy against haematological cancers. Interestingly, several adverse effects are less common, compared to BTZ, in patients treated with CFZ. As the molecular details of these observations remain not well understood we assayed the pathophysiological effects of CFZ vs. BTZ in the Drosophila experimental model. Mass Spectrometry analyses showed that neither CFZ nor BTZ are hydrolysed in flies’ tissues, while at doses inducing similar inhibition of the rate limiting for protein breakdown chymotrypsin-like (CT-L) proteasomal activity, CFZ treatment resulted in less intense increase of oxidative stress or activation of antioxidant and proteostatic modules. Also, despite comparable cardiotoxicity likely due to disrupted mitochondrial function, CFZ did not affect developmental processes, showed minimal neuromuscular defects and reduced to a lesser extent flies’ healthspan. Studies in flies, human cancer cell lines and blood cells isolated from Multiple Myeloma patients treated with CFZ or BTZ revealed, that the increased BTZ toxicity likely relates to partial co-inhibition of the caspase-like (C-L) proteasomal activity Supportively, co-treating flies with CFZ and a C-L selective proteasome inhibitor exacerbated CFZ-mediated toxicity. Our findings provide a reasonable explanation for the differential adverse effects of CFZ and BTZ in the clinic.

Nrf1 can be processed and activated in a proteasome-independent manner

In response to proteasome inhibition, the transcription factor Nrf1 facilitates de novo synthesis of proteasomes by inducing proteasome subunit (PSM) genes [1,2]. Previously, we showed that activation of the p120 form of Nrf1, a membrane-bound protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with the bulk of its polypeptide in the lumen, involves its retrotranslocation into the cytosol in a manner that depends on the AAA-ATPase p97/VCP [3]. This is followed by proteolytic processing and mobilization of the transcriptionally active p110 form of Nrf1 to the nucleus. A subsequent study suggested that site-specific proteolytic processing of Nrf1 by the proteasome yields an active 75 kDa fragment [4]. We show here that under conditions where all three active sites of the proteasome are completely blocked, p120 Nrf1 can still be proteolytically cleaved to the p110 form, which is translocated to the nucleus to activate transcription of PSM genes. Thus, our results indicate that a proteasome-independent pathway can promote the release of active p110 Nrf1 from the ER membrane.