Combination chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone in solid tumors

Vincristine in Combination Therapy of Cancer: Emerging Trends in Clinics

Treatment of blood malignancies and other cancer diseases has been mostly unfeasible, so far. Therefore, novel treatment regimens should be developed and the currently used ones should be further elaborated. A stable component in various cancer treatment regimens consists of vincristine, an antimitotic compound of natural origin. Despite its strong anticancer activity, mostly, it cannot be administered as monotherapy due to its unspecific action and severe side effects. However, vincristine is suitable for combination therapy. Multidrug treatment regimens including vincristine are standardly applied in the therapy of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies, in which it is combined with drugs of different mechanisms of action, mainly with DNA-interacting compounds (for example cyclophosphamide), or drugs interfering with DNA synthesis (for example methotrexate). Besides, co-administration of vincristine with monoclonal antibodies has also emerged, the typical example of which is the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Although in some combination anticancer therapies, vincristine has been replaced with other drugs exhibiting lesser side effects, though, in most cases, it is still irreplaceable. This is strongly evidenced by the number of active clinical trials evaluating vincristine in combination cancer therapy. Therefore, in this article, we have reviewed the most common cancer treatment regimens employing vincristine and bring an overview of current trends in the clinical development of this compound.

Chemotherapy trial with comp-F regimen in advanced adenocarcinoma of prostate

Multiple agent combination chemotherapy was used to treat 16 patients with Stage D adenocarcinoma of the prostate in relapse. Agents employed were cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, vincristine, and prednisone. Results were encouraging. Six of 16 patients achieved an objective response (2 complete, 3 partial, 1 stabilization) for a 37.5 per cent response rate. Eleven of 16 patients achieved a subjective response for a 69% response rate. Soft tissue metastases may be more responsive than bony lesions. Employment of vincristine made no obvious difference in response rate in those patients in whom it was used. Toxicity was only moderate. Further studies are warranted.