Results with methyl-CCNU and DTIC in metastatic melanoma

Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of people with metastatic cutaneous melanoma, a skin cancer, is generally poor. Recently, new classes of drugs (e.g. immune checkpoint inhibitors and small-molecule targeted drugs) have significantly improved patient prognosis, which has drastically changed the landscape of melanoma therapeutic management. This is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2000.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to October 2017: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and LILACS. We also searched five trials registers and the ASCO database in February 2017, and checked the reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs of systemic therapies for people with unresectable lymph node metastasis and distant metastatic cutaneous melanoma compared to any other treatment. We checked the reference lists of selected articles to identify further references to relevant trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data, and a third review author independently verified extracted data. We implemented a network meta-analysis approach to make indirect comparisons and rank treatments according to their effectiveness (as measured by the impact on survival) and harm (as measured by occurrence of high-grade toxicity). The same two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies according to Cochrane standards and assessed evidence quality based on the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 122 RCTs (28,561 participants). Of these, 83 RCTs, encompassing 21 different comparisons, were included in meta-analyses. Included participants were men and women with a mean age of 57.5 years who were recruited from hospital settings. Twenty-nine studies included people whose cancer had spread to their brains. Interventions were categorised into five groups: conventional chemotherapy (including single agent and polychemotherapy), biochemotherapy (combining chemotherapy with cytokines such as interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha), immune checkpoint inhibitors (such as anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies), small-molecule targeted drugs used for melanomas with specific gene changes (such as BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors), and other agents (such as anti-angiogenic drugs). Most interventions were compared with chemotherapy. In many cases, trials were sponsored by pharmaceutical companies producing the tested drug: this was especially true for new classes of drugs, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and small-molecule targeted drugs.When compared to single agent chemotherapy, the combination of multiple chemotherapeutic agents (polychemotherapy) did not translate into significantly better survival (overall survival: HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.16, 6 studies, 594 participants; high-quality evidence; progression-free survival: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.25, 5 studies, 398 participants; high-quality evidence. Those who received combined treatment are probably burdened by higher toxicity rates (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.71, 3 studies, 390 participants; moderate-quality evidence). (We defined toxicity as the occurrence of grade 3 (G3) or higher adverse events according to the World Health Organization scale.)Compared to chemotherapy, biochemotherapy (chemotherapy combined with both interferon-alpha and interleukin-2) improved progression-free survival (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.99, 6 studies, 964 participants; high-quality evidence), but did not significantly improve overall survival (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06, 7 studies, 1317 participants; high-quality evidence). Biochemotherapy had higher toxicity rates (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.61, 2 studies, 631 participants; high-quality evidence).With regard to immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies plus chemotherapy probably increased the chance of progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92, 1 study, 502 participants; moderate-quality evidence), but may not significantly improve overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.01, 2 studies, 1157 participants; low-quality evidence). Compared to chemotherapy alone, anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies is likely to be associated with higher toxicity rates (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.42, 2 studies, 1142 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Compared to chemotherapy, anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (immune checkpoint inhibitors) improved overall survival (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.48, 1 study, 418 participants; high-quality evidence) and probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.61, 2 studies, 957 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies may also result in less toxicity than chemotherapy (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.97, 3 studies, 1360 participants; low-quality evidence).Anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies performed better than anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies in terms of overall survival (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.66, 1 study, 764 participants; high-quality evidence) and progression-free survival (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.60, 2 studies, 1465 participants; high-quality evidence). Anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies may result in better toxicity outcomes than anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.91, 2 studies, 1465 participants; low-quality evidence).Compared to anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies alone, the combination of anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies was associated with better progression-free survival (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.46, 2 studies, 738 participants; high-quality evidence). There may be no significant difference in toxicity outcomes (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.92, 2 studies, 764 participants; low-quality evidence) (no data for overall survival were available).The class of small-molecule targeted drugs, BRAF inhibitors (which are active exclusively against BRAF-mutated melanoma), performed better than chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.57, 2 studies, 925 participants; high-quality evidence) and progression-free survival (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.34, 2 studies, 925 participants; high-quality evidence), and there may be no significant difference in toxicity (RR 1.27, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.33, 2 studies, 408 participants; low-quality evidence).Compared to chemotherapy, MEK inhibitors (which are active exclusively against BRAF-mutated melanoma) may not significantly improve overall survival (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.25, 3 studies, 496 participants; low-quality evidence), but they probably lead to better progression-free survival (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.80, 3 studies, 496 participants; moderate-quality evidence). However, MEK inhibitors probably have higher toxicity rates (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.41, 1 study, 91 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Compared to BRAF inhibitors, the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors was associated with better overall survival (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.82, 4 studies, 1784 participants; high-quality evidence). BRAF plus MEK inhibitors was also probably better in terms of progression-free survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.71, 4 studies, 1784 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and there appears likely to be no significant difference in toxicity (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.20, 4 studies, 1774 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Compared to chemotherapy, the combination of chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenic drugs was probably associated with better overall survival (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.81; moderate-quality evidence) and progression-free survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.92; moderate-quality evidence). There may be no difference in terms of toxicity (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.09 to 5.32; low-quality evidence). All results for this comparison were based on 324 participants from 2 studies.Network meta-analysis focused on chemotherapy as the common comparator and currently approved treatments for which high- to moderate-quality evidence of efficacy (as represented by treatment effect on progression-free survival) was available (based on the above results) for: biochemotherapy (with both interferon-alpha and interleukin-2); anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies; anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies; anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies; BRAF inhibitors; MEK inhibitors, and BRAF plus MEK inhibitors. Analysis (which included 19 RCTs and 7632 participants) generated 21 indirect comparisons.The best evidence (moderate-quality evidence) for progression-free survival was found for the following indirect comparisons:• both combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.51) and small-molecule targeted drugs (HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.26) probably improved progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy;• both BRAF inhibitors (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.68) and combinations of small-molecule targeted drugs (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.39) were probably associated with better progression-free survival compared to anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies;• biochemotherapy (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.51) probably lead to worse progression-free survival compared to BRAF inhibitors;• the combination of small-molecule targeted drugs probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.68) compared to anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies;• both biochemotherapy (HR 5.05, 95% CI 3.01 to 8.45) and MEK inhibitors (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.77 to 5.65) were probably associated with worse progression-free survival compared to the combination of small-molecule targeted drugs; and• biochemotherapy was probably associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 2.81, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.11) compared to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors.The best evidence (moderate-quality evidence) for toxicity was found for the following indirect comparisons:• combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (RR 3.49, 95% CI 2.12 to 5.77) probably increased toxicity compared to chemotherapy;• combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors probably increased toxicity (RR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20 to 5.20) compared to BRAF inhibitors;• the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors probably increased toxicity (RR 3.83, 95% CI 2.59 to 5.68) compared to anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies; and• biochemotherapy was probably associated with lower toxicity (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71) compared to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Network meta-analysis-based ranking suggested that the combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors is the most effective strategy in terms of progression-free survival, whereas anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies are associated with the lowest toxicity.Overall, the risk of bias of the included trials can be considered as limited. When considering the 122 trials included in this review and the seven types of bias we assessed, we performed 854 evaluations only seven of which (< 1%) assigned high risk to six trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found high-quality evidence that many treatments offer better efficacy than chemotherapy, especially recently implemented treatments, such as small-molecule targeted drugs, which are used to treat melanoma with specific gene mutations. Compared with chemotherapy, biochemotherapy (in this case, chemotherapy combined with both interferon-alpha and interleukin-2) and BRAF inhibitors improved progression-free survival; BRAF inhibitors (for BRAF-mutated melanoma) and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies improved overall survival. However, there was no difference between polychemotherapy and monochemotherapy in terms of achieving progression-free survival and overall survival. Biochemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival and has higher toxicity rates compared with chemotherapy.There was some evidence that combined treatments worked better than single treatments: anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies, alone or with anti-CTLA4, improved progression-free survival compared with anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies alone. Anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies performed better than anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibodies in terms of overall survival, and a combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors was associated with better overall survival for BRAF-mutated melanoma, compared to BRAF inhibitors alone.The combination of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors (which can only be administered to people with BRAF-mutated melanoma) appeared to be the most effective treatment (based on results for progression-free survival), whereas anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies appeared to be the least toxic, and most acceptable, treatment.Evidence quality was reduced due to imprecision, between-study heterogeneity, and substandard reporting of trials. Future research should ensure that those diminishing influences are addressed. Clinical areas of future investigation should include the longer-term effect of new therapeutic agents (i.e. immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies) on overall survival, as well as the combination of drugs used in melanoma treatment; research should also investigate the potential influence of biomarkers.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of overall survival comparing 3 mg/kg ipilimumab with alternative therapies in the management of pretreated patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients treated with 3 mg/kg ipilimumab versus alternative systemic therapies in pretreated unresectable stage III or IV melanoma patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify relevant randomized clinical trials. From these trials, Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each intervention were digitized and combined by means of a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different drug classes.

RESULTS

Of 38 trials identified, 15 formed one interlinked network by drug class to allow for an NMA. Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg/kg, was associated with a greater mean OS time (18.8 months; 95% credible interval [CrI], 15.5-23.0 months) than single-agent chemotherapy (12.3 months; 95% CrI, 6.3-28.0 months), chemotherapy combinations (12.2 months; 95% CrI, 7.1-23.3 months), biochemotherapies (11.9 months; 95% CrI, 7.0-22.0 months), single-agent immunotherapy (11.1 months; 95% CrI, 8.5-16.2 months), and immunotherapy combinations (14.1 months; 95% CrI, 9.0-23.8 months).

CONCLUSION

Results of this NMA were in line with previous findings and suggest that OS with ipilimumab is expected to be greater than with alternative systemic therapies, alone or in combination, for the management of pretreated patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma.

Melanoma: from darkness to promise

Metastatic melanoma is one of the most resistant tumors to standard chemotherapy approaches. The median overall survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma is lower than 9 months. Current approved treatments offer only marginal survival advantages. New immunotherapeutic targets have appeared recently trying to modulate the host immune response against the tumor. New targeted agents have changed the standard of care of other solid tumor types like breast cancer. Here, we discuss the new advances and achievements in the treatment of this highly resistant disease.

Pharmacokinetic results of a phase I trial of sorafenib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of Raf and several growth factor receptors, is under investigation in combination with dacarbazine, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of many cancers. The current phase I study investigates the effects of sorafenib on the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of dacarbazine and its metabolite 5-amino-imidazole-4-carboxamide (AIC). (AIC is formed in amounts equimolar to the active alkylating moiety, methane diazohydroxide, which is undetectable by known validated assays.)

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors received intravenous dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle to evaluate the PK of dacarbazine alone. Sorafenib 400 mg was administered twice daily continuously starting at day 2 of cycle 1. The PK of dacarbazine in the presence of sorafenib was assessed on day 1 of cycle 2. Sorafenib PK was also assessed at steady state.

RESULTS

PK data were available for 15 of 23 patients. With concomitant administration of sorafenib, the mean AUC and C (max) values of dacarbazine were reduced by 23 and 16%, respectively. Mean AUC and C (max) values of AIC were increased by 41 and 45%, respectively, with individual increases of up to 106 and 136%, respectively. The apparent terminal half-lives of the two compounds were not significantly influenced by sorafenib. Based on coefficients of variation, the AUC and C (max) values for sorafenib and its three metabolites were highly variable with dacarbazine coadministration.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of sorafenib and dacarbazine as described above may result in decreased dacarbazine exposure but increased AIC exposure.

The history and future of chemotherapy for melanoma

Melanoma is considered a chemotherapy-resistant cancer, but in reality there are several chemotherapy drugs with significant single-agent activity. Response rates to combination regimens are reproducibly higher than with standard dacarbazine, but of the randomized trials comparing combination regimens with dacarbazine, none were of sufficient size to detect a realistic effect on survival. Similarly, adjuvant chemotherapy has not had a realistic test in melanoma. Response to chemotherapy is associated reproducibly with better survival rates suggesting that regimens with higher response rates are needed. Recent observations suggest that combining antiangiogenic agents with either dacarbazine or temozolomide can double response rates. These combinations are worthy of further investigation and might serve as a foundation on which to build a combination regimen that improves overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients.

Treatments for metastatic melanoma: synthesis of evidence from randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Advanced melanomas (non-resectable Stage-III/IV) are fatal, with few effective treatments. It remains unclear if other drugs offer improvements over the standard, dacarbazine.

PURPOSE

We quantified objective response rates (Complete+Partial response) of dacarbazine versus comparators for advanced cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

We retrieved all head-to-head randomized controlled trials involving dacarbazine and other drugs/combinations. Two reviewers searched MEDLINE (1966-Jan 2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), CINAHL (1982-2006) and Cochrane library, then compared results. Differences were resolved through consensus. Rates were combined using random effects meta-analysis. chi2 tested heterogeneity; points from Jadad's method were assessed to examine study quality.

RESULTS

We found 48 studies having 111 active treatment arms [24 with dacarbazine monotherapy (n=1390), 75 with dacarbazine combinations (n=4962), and 12 with non-dacarbazine treatments (n=783)] treating 7135 patients. Overall, study quality was poor. Response to dacarbazine monotherapy ranged between 5.3% and 28.0% (average 15.3%), OR=1.31, CI(95%): 1.06-1.61; N=3356. Partial responses comprised 73% of successes. Only adding interferons improved response rates (OR=1.69, CI(95%): 1.07-2.68, N=778) but survival duration was not significantly longer (P=0.32), and trials with larger sample sizes found lower success rates. All other treatments alone or in combination were ineffective P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Dacarbazine generally produces poor outcomes. Adding other therapies offers minimal clinical advantages (possibly with interferons). In general, study quality was poor and sample sizes were small. This meta-analysis highlights the unmet need for effective treatment options for advanced melanoma.

Chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: time for a change?

Melanoma is a neoplasm with a rising incidence. Early-stage melanoma is curable, but advanced, metastatic melanoma almost uniformly is fatal, and patients with such advanced disease have a short median survival. Systemic therapy remains unsatisfactory, inducing complete durable responses in a small minority of patients. For the current review, the authors focused on the current role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma and the future prospects for improvements for multiagent chemotherapy and chemotherapy combined with immunomodulatory and/or molecularly targeted agents. They discuss roles of single-agent chemotherapy, combination chemotherapy, combinations of chemotherapy with immunomodulatory or hormone agents, biochemotherapy, and combination chemotherapy with targeted therapies.

The impact of thrombocytopenia from temozolomide and radiation in newly diagnosed adults with high-grade gliomas

Temozolomide (TMZ) administered daily with radiation therapy (RT) for six weeks, followed by adjuvant TMZ for six months, has become standard therapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). After several newly diagnosed patients at our institution developed severe (grade 3-4), prolonged thrombocytopenia, we conducted a retrospective review to define the incidence, depth, and duration of thrombocytopenia associated with this therapy. We reviewed the medical records and laboratory data of all adult patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas who started treatment with this regimen between June 2004, when the regimen was first used at our institution, and August 2005. Of the 52 patients who met the criteria for this review, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 10 (19%; 95% CI, 10%-33%). In eight patients, the thrombocytopenia was attributable to concurrent daily TMZ and RT. The median duration of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was 32 days (range, 1-389 days). Five patients (10%) required platelet transfusions, two (4%) have required continued biweekly platelet transfusions for over six months, and nine (17%) discontinued therapy because of thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 25% of women and 14% of men. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia were noted in 10% and 8% of patients, respectively, and were not clinically significant. Between 15% and 20% of our newly diagnosed patients receiving TMZ and RT developed severe (grade 3-4) and potentially irreversible thrombocytopenia. The factors that predispose patients to this toxicity have yet to be determined. This toxicity should be considered when (1) prescribing this regimen to patient populations where a clinical benefit has yet to be shown, (2) contemplating empirical escalations of the dose or duration of TMZ, or (3) combining it with other potentially myelosuppressive therapies.

Pimozide in dermatologic practice: a comprehensive review

Pimozide is an antipsychotic drug of the diphenylbutylpiperidine class. In the US, it is FDA-approved only as a backup treatment for Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, although it has been used in other countries for many years as a treatment for schizophrenia. In the past 20 years, pimozide has been found to be especially efficacious in the treatment of monosymptomatic hypochondriacal psychoses and is used by psychiatrists and dermatologists for this off-label purpose. In particular, pimozide is considered the treatment of choice for delusions of parasitosis. In addition, pimozide has been found to be efficacious in the treatment of body dysmorphic disorder, metastatic melanoma, trichotillomania, and trigeminal and postherpetic neuralgia. This review aims to familiarize physicians, especially dermatologists, on the uses of pimozide in dermatologic practice. A review of the literature was performed and the relevant information synthesized to give a complete overview of the drug and its therapeutic uses in dermatology.

Medical management of melanoma

The treatment for malignant melanoma has undergone significant changes over the past few decades, with biological therapy playing an increasingly important role and replacing the traditional cytotoxic agents as the first-line therapy for this disease, both in advanced disease and adjuvant settings. Despite the developments of new modalities of therapy for melanoma, the outcome for patients with advanced disease remains poor. This article discusses the clinical studies that have shaped our current management of melanoma, both in the adjuvant setting, and in the metastatic setting. Additionally, successes and failures of clinical trials will be discussed, as they will guide the strategic development of future studies in the management of this aggressive disease.

Single-agent DTIC versus combination chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a meta-analysis of 3273 patients from 20 randomized trials

It is currently unclear whether any combination therapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma is superior to standard single-agent dacarbazine (DTIC) in terms of tumour response and overall survival. The available randomized clinical trial data were combined in a meta-analysis to address this question. Initially a thorough MEDLARS search was conducted covering the time period from January 1970 to January 1999. This literature search was supplemented by manual searches of study bibliographies (including review articles) and review of relevant textbooks. The meta-analysis was performed according to a prospective protocol using strict study eligibility criteria. Data derived from randomized controlled trials comparing single-agent DTIC with combination chemo/immunotherapy were combined using a fixed effects model. Data were stratified into three combination therapy groups: DTIC-containing regimens, non-DTIC-containing therapy, and chemotherapy plus immunotherapy. The primary outcome of interest was the proportion of patients demonstrating a complete or partial response to treatment. A total of 20 randomized trials comprising 3273 patients were initially combined in a meta-analysis. This yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.48), demonstrating that combination drug therapies are associated with a 23% increase in response rate compared with single-agent DTIC. The combination of DTIC plus interferon-alpha produced a tumour response rate 53% greater (95% CI 1.10-2.13) than that seen with DTIC alone. This increase was greater than that seen with DTIC-containing multi-drug regimens, which had an OR of 1.33 (95% CI 0.99-1.78). No difference in overall survival was demonstrated. Non-DTIC-containing treatment programmes showed no advantage over DTIC in terms of tumour response rate (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.45-1.32). The combination of DTIC and interferon-alpha appears more active than standard single-agent DTIC in metastatic melanoma. Further randomized clinical trials employing a DTIC plus interferon arm are necessary to confirm these results.

Randomized trial of treatment with cisplatin and interleukin-2 either alone or in combination with interferon-alpha-2a in patients with metastatic melanoma: a Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Multicenter, parallel study

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the response rate, survival, and toxicity of treatment with cisplatin and high dose intravenous continuous infusion interleukin-2 (IL-2) with or without interferon-alpha-2a (IFN) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

One hundred and seventeen patients with metastatic melanoma randomly were assigned to receive cisplatin, 100 mg/m2, followed after a 3-day rest period by IL-2, 18 x 10(6) IU/m2, on Days 3-6 and Days 17-21 (Arm 1) or cisplatin and IL-2 using an identical schedule plus subcutaneous IFN, 9 x 10(6) U, 3 times a week during IL-2 administration (Arm 2). In the absence of disease progression or undue toxicity, the cycle could be repeated on Day 29. Patients who responded after two cycles eventually could receive a third cycle. One hundred and one patients were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy.

RESULTS

On treatment Arm 1, 3 patients (6%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 5 patients (10%) achieved a partial response (PR) with a median response duration of 3.8 months for the CRs and 8.7 months for the PRs. On treatment Arm 2, 2 patients (3%) achieved a CR (durations of 5.9 and 33.1 months, respectively) and 11 patients (21%) a PR with a median response duration of 8.3 months. The median durations of overall survival were 10.4 months (range, 1.1-39.7+ months) and 10.9 months (range, 0.5-38.1+ months) for treatment Arms 1 and 2, respectively. The toxicity profile was consistent with the known side effects of this IL-2 intravenous regimen combined with cisplatin chemotherapy and IFN. Toxicity was more pronounced in treatment Arm 2 compared with treatment Arm 1. There were 2 and 4 patients, respectively, in treatment Arms 1 and 2 who died within 28 days after completion of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed overall response rates of 16% and 25% in treatment Arms 1 and 2, respectively, is lower than that expected with biochemotherapy; despite the fact that the objective of the trial was not to show any difference between the 2 treatment arms, our results indicate that the addition of IFN, at the dose and schedule used in this trial, fails to improve the activity of a cisplatin/IL-2 regimen significantly in patients with metastatic melanoma. Although response rates were relatively low, the median overall survival was nearly 1 year in both groups.

Medical treatment of metastatic melanoma

The role of combination chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic melanoma is still a matter of controversy because of the lack of prospective trials directly demonstrating increased response rates and improved survival compared with DTIC alone. Nevertheless, several three-drug regimens have reported response rates between 30% and 50% in single-institution studies. The duration of response medians of these regimens ranges between 6 and 9 months. However, the survival medians of 6 to 11 months are not substantially better than those of DTIC alone. However, survival at 1 and 2 years following initiation of therapy may more clearly demonstrate an impact of therapies for metastatic melanoma.

Phase II trial of docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with metastatic melanoma previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy

A phase II study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with malignant melanoma. Between April 1992 and February 1996, 37 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma and no prior chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg m-2 administered intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days. Patients were premedicated prior to each course with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine. Toxicity and follow-up were provided. Objective responses were seen in two out of 35 patients evaluable for response, one complete response and one partial response. These two responses were of a duration of greater than two years. The most common toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 92% of patients; 49% required hospitalization for an episode of neutropenic fever. Additional patients had reversible grade 3-4 toxicities including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, arthralgias, myalgias, peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. Eighteen patients had hypersensitivity reactions, two were grade 3-4. Fluid retention, grade 1-3 was observed in seven patients. Alopecia occurred in most patients. Docetaxel has definite but low-level activity against malignant melanoma. Further investigation of this drug should be considered in multidrug combination programs.

The addition of tamoxifen to dacarbazine and cisplatin in metastatic malignant melanoma. A phase II trial of the Southwest Oncology Group, (SWOG-8921)

Based on the reports of substantial improvement in the response rate w ith the addition of tamoxifen to a multiagent chemotherapy regimen for metastatic melanoma, Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)-8921 was initiated. A prior regimen (SWOG-8804) of dacarbazine (DTIC) 750 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) day 1 repeated every 3 weeks produced a 13% response rate in patients with metastatic melanoma without brain metastasis. SWOG-8921 using identical chemotherapy and schedule added tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily. There were 55 eligible patients registered, median age 52, with 37 men and 18 women. Fifty (91%) patients had evidence of visceral metastasis at registration. There were 10 responders (2 complete and 8 partial responses) for an 18% response rate (95% CI, 9-31%). The response rate in women was 28% (95% CI, 10-53%; in men, 14% (95% CI, 5-29%). Tamoxifen has produced a small increase in the response rate when added to the present combination and schedule of chemotherapy. Further Phase III trials will be necessary to assess whether there is a statistical advantage to the use of tamoxifen when combined with chemotherapy and whether there are statistical differences between men and women.

Chemoimmunotherapy of advanced malignant melanoma: sequential administration of subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha after intravenous dacarbazine and carboplatin or intravenous dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine and tamoxifen

Both chemotherapy and interleukin-2 and/or interferon-alpha produce objective responses in a proportion of advanced malignant melanoma patients. While duration of response to chemotherapy is short, i.e. usually below 4 months, immunotherapy has resulted in a small number of long-lasting remissions in patients with metastatic melanoma. In two consecutive phase II trials in a total of 67 patients, we assessed the potential synergism between both modalities, i.e. chemo- and immunotherapy. Treatment consisted of intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin (CBDCA, 400 mg/m2) and dacarbazine (DTIC, 750 mg/m2) given twice (i.v. bolus over 30 min) at 3-week intervals, or 4 cycles of DTIC (220 mg/m2 i.v. 3 days), cisplatin (DDP, 35 mg/m2 i.v. 3 days), carmustine (BCNU, 150 mg/m2 i.v. cycles 1 and 3) and tamoxifen (TAM, 20 mg oral/daily) at 3-week intervals. Chemotherapy was followed by immunotherapy with combined subcutaneous (s.c.) interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and SC interferon-alpha 2 (rIFN-alpha). Among 40 patients who received a full cycle of chemotherapy with CBDCA/DTIC and sequential immunotherapy, there were 3 (7.5%) complete remissions (CRs) with a median duration of 19 months (range 13-26+). Partial remissions (PRs) were noted in 11 (27.5%) patients with a median response duration of 8 (range 5-14) months. Among 27 patients who received DTIC/DDP/BCNU/TAM and rIL-2/rIFN-alpha, there were 3 (11%) complete remissions and 12 (44.5%) partial remissions. Duration of complete and partial remissions ranged from 9+ to 13+ (median, 11+), and 5 to 15+ (median, 7+) months, respectively. Chemotherapy produced mostly moderate toxicity. Thrombocytopenia was common with the nadir after a median time of 18 days following start of CBDCA/DTIC and DTIC/DDP/BCNU, respectively. 10 patients required transfusion of thrombocytes. Nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy were well tolerated using concomitant ondansetrone (8 mg i.v.). Immunotherapy was self-administered at home with mild to moderate side effects; malaise, fever, chills, nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia and arthralgias were most frequent, but were spontaneously reversible after ending rIL-2/IFN-alpha. A mean 87 and 88% of the projected doses of rIL-2 and rIFN-alpha were administered on either protocol. There were no life-threatening complications and no treatment-related deaths. The sequential combination of chemotherapy and rIL-2 plus rIFN-alpha had at least additive therapeutic activity against metastatic malignant melanoma. The schedules produced long-lasting remissions and were tolerated well overall. These trials substantiate a potential role for low to intermediate dose immunotherapy in maintaining and consolidating therapeutic effects of chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma.

Experience with interferon alpha 2b combined with dacarbazine in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma

A prospectively randomized trial was undertaken to compare dacarbazine (DTIC) alone with DTIC plus interferon in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. Of the 73 patients who entered on the study, 36 were randomized to receive DTIC alone and 37 were randomized to receive the combination DTIC plus interferon. The two sections were well balanced. There was more toxicity on the combination section, but no life threatening toxicity. The overall response rate for patients on DTIC was 20% (two complete and five partial responses) (95% CI 7-39%) and for patients on DTIC plus interferon was 50% (13 complete and four partial responses) (95% CI 26-72%) (p = 0.007). The median time to treatment failure, was significantly more in favour of the combination treatment (9 versus 2.5 months; p < 0.01, Mantel-Cox). The median survival of 16.7 versus 8 months was in favor of the combination treatment (p < 0.01). The reasons for the improved results with the combination treatment are discussed. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group is currently, based on the results of this study, investigating the role of interferon combinations in metastatic malignant melanoma.

Phase II study of vindesine and dacarbazine with or without non-specific stimulation of the immune system in patients with metastatic melanoma

A single dose of dacarbazine (DTIC), followed by a 5-day intravenous infusion of vindesine (VDS) was administered every 3 weeks to 103 patients with metastatic melanoma. One half of the patients were randomised to receive intravenous methanol extraction residue (MER) of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in addition to chemotherapy, on days 7 and 14 of each course. 98 patients were evaluable. The response rates in treatment groups were 16 and 17%, respectively (confidence interval 9-24%). Neither the response rate nor the survival improved when MER was added to chemotherapy. Toxicity was moderate except for a significant granulocytopenia. The combination of DTIC and VDS is not more effective than DTIC alone and has added neurotoxicity.

Treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: review and recommendations

This article reviews the published clinical responses of metastatic uveal melanoma and metastatic cutaneous melanoma with visceral involvement to current therapeutic protocols. Despite isolated patient responses to systemic treatment, no effective treatment currently exists for metastatic uveal melanoma. However, several new approaches involving interferons and interleukin and combination chemotherapy have shown some activity against metastatic cutaneous melanoma. The effectiveness against metastatic uveal melanomas has not been determined. A new approach to intrahepatic administration of chemotherapy also warrants further evaluation because of the high incidence of hepatic involvement with metastatic uveal melanoma. When an effective systemic treatment is found, early administration as an adjuvant to primary treatment may provide the best strategy for control of systemic spread.

Systemic chemotherapy for malignant melanoma

Malignant melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. Standard single agents include dacarbazine and the nitrosoureas, but most series treating patients with metastatic melanoma report response rates of about 20%. Occasional patients, however, achieve long term remission, amounting to cure, after such treatment. Adjuvant studies have failed to define any systemic therapy of value after surgery for primary or regional lymph node disease. Combinations of drugs have not been shown to be superior to single agents. Cisplatin and fotemustine are among the newer agents with activity. Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and systemic therapy with high dose alkylating agents and marrow transplantation suggest that the resistance to conventional concentrations of alkylating agents is not absolute. One strategy to improve the efficacy of alkylating agents may therefore be the modulation of cellular glutathione or glutathione-S-transferase. Biological response modifiers remain of interest, though many of the protocols with the best response rates are impractical for routine use. Many patients with asymptomatic metastatic melanoma should be observed without treatment. Outside clinical trials, it is reasonable to use single agent dacarbazine or lomustine if chemotherapy is required.

Malignant melanoma: primary presentation in bone marrow and lymph node

We describe an unusual presentation of malignant melanoma with simultaneous lymph node and bone marrow metastasis. In addition the disease was associated with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. A brief remission was obtained with combination chemotherapy.

Fotemustine plus dacarbazine for malignant melanoma

119 patients with metastatic melanoma received fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 15-18. After a 5-week rest, fotemustine 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on days 2-5 was given every 3-4 weeks. 12 complete responses (11.6%) and 16 partial responses were observed in 103 evaluable patients (response rate 27.2%). The median duration of response was 21.5+ weeks (8+ to 53+). The response rate was 26.3% in CNS, 18.2% in visceral sites and 37.5% in non-visceral sites. The toxicity was mainly haematological: grade III-IV leukopenia in 27.4% and thrombocytopenia in 23.4%. The response rate was lower than that in 63 patients previously reported. The present series had a higher median age (54 vs. 40 years) without any differences in other population variables. However, activity on CNS metastases and on non-visceral sites was confirmed. Haematological toxicity was about 50% lower than that with fotemustine alone. Hence, this is an active outpatient regimen for metastatic melanoma, especially against cerebral and non-visceral metastases.

Fotemustine plus dacarbazine in advanced stage III malignant melanoma

19 patients with advanced malignant melanoma were treated with fotemustine and dacarbazine. Data recorded and available for evaluation in all patients included clinical and histopathological parameters of the primary melanoma, blood chemistry, blood cell count, chest X-ray, ultrasound and bone scan for initial staging of the site of metastases and follow-up during treatment. Dosage was fotemustine 100 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 200 mg/m2 intravenously twice monthly on days 1 and 8, repeated for a maximum of six courses. There were two complete and three partial responses in 5/19 patients (26%), and 8 patients (42%) had stable disease. 6 (32%) patients had no response. Median length of complete and partial responses was 3.9 months, and that of stable disease 4.2 months. The main side-effects were thrombocytopenia in 10 patients (53%) and nausea in 6 (32%); the nausea was easily suppressed by ondasetron. Thus, fotemustine-dacarbazine may be new treatment in advanced melanoma.

Treatment of advanced malignant melanoma with recombinant interferon alfa-2a in combination with DTIC: long-term follow-up of two phase II studies

The present studies were designed to examine whether treatment of disseminated melanoma with a combination of recombinant interferon alpha (rIFN alpha-2a) and DTIC may provide better results than either agent alone. Two dose levels of rIFN alpha-2a were examined with the same dose and schedule of DTIC administration. In the first study 76 patients were treated with rIFN alpha-2a (3 x 10(6) IU days 1-3, 9 x 10(6) IU days 4-70 then 9 x 10(6) IU TIW) plus DTIC (i.v. 200 mg/m2, escalating to 800 mg/m2 each 21 d) for 6 months or longer or until failure. Responses were seen in 26% of patients overall (7CR, 13PR) with the highest responses being seen in those assessed as having a good prognosis and in patients with skin and/or lung metastases. It was notable that males showed a better response than females and that patients with metastases in lymph nodes showed low responses. Response rates in 30 patients treated with high-dose rIFN alpha-2a (18 x 10(6) IU days 7-70) were not superior to that seen at the lower dose and was accompanied by significant increase in bone marrow toxicity. The duration of responses appeared longer than expected from responses to DTIC alone and four patients remain progression free at periods in excess of 3 years. Failure in nine of the responders was due to the development of brain metastases which emphasizes the need for additional treatment approaches to treat micrometastases at this site. The results of a randomized control study comparing DTIC alone with DTIC plus 'low' dose rIFN alpha-2a are awaited with interest.

A phase II trial of high-dose cisplatin and dacarbazine. Lack of efficacy of high-dose, cisplatin-based therapy for metastatic melanoma

Cisplatin and dacarbazine are used widely in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. To evaluate high-dose cisplatin and dacarbazine, 32 patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and dacarbazine 350 mg/m2 daily for three days repeated at 28-day intervals. Their median age was 43.5 years (range, 25 to 73 years), and their median Karnofsky performance status was 80% (range, 70% to 100%). Measurable and evaluable disease sites (number of patients) included lymph nodes (22), lung (17), soft tissue (16), liver (13), bone (seven), spleen (four), adrenal gland (three), skin (three), and other sites (five). Patients received a median of two cycles of therapy (range, one to eight cycles). Thirty patients were evaluable for response. No complete responses were observed. Five patients had a partial response (17%; 95% confidence interval, 3% to 30%) for 16+, 12+, 7, 6.5, and 3 months. Responding sites of disease included lymph nodes (five of 22), lung (three of 17), and soft tissue (two of 16). Hematologic toxicity (Grade greater than or equal to 3) included neutropenia (16 of 32 patients, 30 of 90 cycles), thrombocytopenia (eight of 32 patients, 12 of 90 cycles), and anemia (five patients). Nine episodes of neutropenia and fever were seen in four patients; two had bacteremia. Nonhematologic toxicity (Grade greater than or equal to 3) included hypotension (two patients), nausea and vomiting (four), neuropathy (two), ototoxicity (four), and hypomagnesemia (nine). The low objective response rate and severe toxicity of this regimen preclude its standard use in patients with metastatic melanoma. A review of cisplatin-based therapy in metastatic melanoma suggests that there is no dose-response relationship. The use of high-dose cisplatin (greater than 100 mg/m2) in the treatment of metastatic melanoma is not recommended.

The use of L-dopa and carbidopa in metastatic malignant melanoma

A combination of L-dopa and carbidopa was given orally to 17 patients with metastatic melanoma. Maximum tolerated oral doses were given, up to 4 grams daily. No response was seen in 15 patients evaluable for response. Toxicity was considerable, with seven of 17 patients (41%) stopping treatment because of unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicity or postural hypotension. Contrary to previous anecdotal reports, there was no evidence that L-dopa/carbidopa treatment resulted in accelerated progression of metastatic melanoma. Orally administered L-dopa/carbidopa is ineffective as therapy for advanced melanoma when maximum tolerated doses are used.

Final report of the French multicenter phase II study of the nitrosourea fotemustine in 153 evaluable patients with disseminated malignant melanoma including patients with cerebral metastases

One hundred sixty-nine patients with histologic evidence of disseminated malignant melanoma, including patients with cerebral metastases, were entered into a Phase II study of the nitrosourea fotemustine. The treatment regimen consisted of a 100 mg/m2 1 hour IV infusion every week for 3 consecutive weeks, followed by a 4- to 5-week rest period (induction therapy). In responding or stabilized patients, maintenance therapy consisted of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until the disease progressed. One hundred fifty-three patients were evaluable for response. Three complete responses and 34 partial responses were observed (according to the World Health Organization criteria), leading to an objective response rate of 24.2% (95% confidence interval: 17.4% to 31.0%). Responses were also documented on cerebral (25.0%), visceral (19.2%), or nonvisceral (31.8%) metastatic sites. The median duration of response was 22 weeks (range, 7 to 80 weeks). The objective response rate in previously untreated patients was 30.7% (19 of 62 patients). The main toxicity was hematologic with delayed and reversible leukopenia and/or thrombopenia. The objective response rate observed (especially in untreated patients), the activity on cerebral metastases, and the small amount of extra-hematologic toxicity encountered suggest that fotemustine is an effective drug in disseminated malignant melanoma.

Phase II trial of carboplatin in patients with advanced melanoma

We report the results of a phase II evaluation of carboplatin (CBDCA) in 45 patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Of the 43 evaluable patients, 6 had been treated previously with chemotherapy; 11 had been treated with immunotherapy. The initial dose was 400 mg/m2 i.v. every 4 weeks; the dose was modified as required to achieve moderate myelosuppression. There was one complete response (duration 16 months) and six partial responses, for a major objective response rate of 16%. Toxicity consisted primarily of acute nausea and vomiting, and thrombocytopenia. The activity of CBDCA in this disease is similar to that of cisplatin and dacarbazine.

Combination chemotherapy of dacarbazine and fotemustine in disseminated malignant melanoma. Experience of the French Study Group

A total of 70 patients presenting with a disseminated malignant melanoma were entered into a multicentric study of combination chemotherapy using dacarbazine and fotemustine. In all, 63 patients were evaluable, 31.8% of whom had previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy. The protocol consisted of induction treatment with a weekly infusion of 100 mg/m2 fotemustine on days 1 and 8 and a daily infusion of 250 mg/m2 dacarbazine on days 15/18 followed by a 4- to 5-week rest period. Responding and stabilized patients were given maintenance treatment comprising fotemustine (100 mg/m2, day 1) and dacarbazine (250 mg/m2, days 2/5) every 3 weeks. The response rate was 33.3% (9 complete responses (CRs) and 12 partial responses (PRs)) and was outstanding among pretreated patients (34.9%). Responses were also documented in cerebral (28.6%), visceral (23.1%) and nonvisceral (43.3%) metastatic sites. Toxicity was mainly hematologic (22.2%, grade III/IV leukopenia; 20.3%, grade III/IV thrombocytopenia) and was acceptable. These results are encouraging in terms of the antitumor activity against nonvisceral metastases (43.3%) and the percentage of CRs obtained (23.3%), and they confirm the activity of fotemustine in cerebral metastatic sites.

A prospective evaluation of a triple-drug regimen containing cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD) for metastatic melanoma

Based on the independent activity of cisplatin, vinblastine, and dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide (DTIC) (CVD), a combination of these agents was used in the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. Vinblastine was used in a dose of 1.6 mg/m2/d for 5 days, DTIC was used in a dose of 800 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1, and cisplatin was used in a dose of 20 mg/m2/d for 4 days starting on day 2 of chemotherapy. The courses of chemotherapy were repeated at 3-week intervals. All patients were premedicated with antiemetics, and IV hydration was used before cisplatin. Fifty-two consecutive patients were registered and 50 were evaluable for response. Two patients achieved a complete response (CR) and 18 patients had a partial response (PR) for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval, 27% to 55%). The median duration of response was 9 months and the median survival time of the responders was 12 months. The overall median survival time of patients treated on this protocol was 9 months. The treatment was associated with significant toxicity consisting of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and partial hair loss. Additionally, neutropenia with a median nadir granulocyte count of 500/microliters was observed, and significant anemia required blood transfusions in a majority of the patients after three to four courses of chemotherapy. The dose-limiting toxicity was peripheral neuropathy which required discontinuation of cisplatin after six to eight courses of chemotherapy. We believe that this triple-drug regimen has significant activity that appears to be superior to the single-agent activity of these drugs, both in terms of increased response rate and duration of response.

Regional treatment of hepatic metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatic metastases represent a common site of dissemination for a number of primary malignancies related in part to the dual blood supply, large blood flow, and receptive environment of the hepatic parenchyma. Although this review focuses on regional therapy, we have included sections on systemic therapy to better interpret the results with intrahepatic therapy. We will also discuss the efficiency of hepatic arterial ligation, embolization, and radiotherapy of hepatic metastases. Primary gastrointestinal neoplasms are particularly prone to produce hepatic metastases. Because colorectal carcinoma metastasizes to the liver in up to 70% of patients with advanced disease, the treatment of hepatic metastases is a relevant topic. We will discuss the systemic and regional therapy of colorectal, gastric, and gallbladder cancers. Breast carcinoma and malignant melanoma frequently metastasize to the liver, and we have described systemic and regional treatments of these diseases. Because sarcomas are often treated by regional therapy, we have included a section on the treatment of hepatic sarcomas. Neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid and islet cell), although often slow growing, frequently metastasize to the liver and then cause symptomatic problems. Much of the work done with embolization and hepatic ligation in the treatment of hepatic metastases has been performed in neuroendocrine tumors, and these studies, as well as the systemic and regional chemotherapy of hepatic metastases, will be described. The last section concerns the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. We have outlined the staging systems used. We then detail the results of systemic and intrahepatic therapy, embolization, and hepatic ligation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Because hepatic metastases are a frequent problem, many patients are available for clinical investigation. It is hoped that newer strategies for the treatment of liver metastases will lead to higher response rates and perhaps control of local disease. These therapeutic approaches may also give us leads to the treatment of systemic disease.

Phase II study of AMSA alone and in combination with DTIC in patients with metastatic melanoma

A randomized phase II study of AMSA (amsacrine) alone and AMSA combined with DTIC (dacarbazine) was carried out in 31 and 39 patients with metastatic melanoma respectively. AMSA was used at a starting dose of 40 mg/m2/day X 3 days with escalation to 50-60 mg/m2/day X 3 days in 8 pts. For AMSA + DTIC the starting dose was: AMSA 30 mg/m2/day X 3 days; DTIC, 800 mg/m2 X 1 day. Additionally, seven pts received AMSA in a similar dose schedule but DTIC was used in a 5-day schedule of 250 mg/m2/day. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response in the AMSA group and 36 in the AMSA + DTIC group. The objective response to AMSA included 1(4%) partial response compared with 11 complete or partial responses (30%) with AMSA + DTIC therapy. The median lowest absolute granulocyte count was 1100/microliters in AMSA group compared with 1000/microliters in the AMSA + DTIC group. Severe neutropenia of less than 500 granulocytes/microliter was observed in 5 pts in the AMSA group compared with 13 pts in the AMSA + DTIC group. We concluded that AMSA has no significant activity against melanoma, although the combination of AMSA + DTIC seemed to be more active than DTIC alone.

Phase II evaluation of dibromodulcitol and actinomycin D, hydroxyurea, and cyclophosphamide in previously untreated patients with malignant melanoma

In this Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase II study, dibromodulcitol (DBD) and a combination of actinomycin D, hydroxyurea, and cyclophosphamide (AHC) were compared with methyl-CCNU, the current ECOG standard, in patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for disseminated malignant melanoma. The response rates were 6% (3/50) for AHC, 9% (3/34) for DBD, and 14% (7/49) for methyl-CCNU. Median survival times were 4, 5, and 6 months, respectively. Neither regimen appears to offer any advantage over methyl-CCNU as front-line therapy for patients with disseminated melanoma.

Recombinant leukocyte A interferon (rIFN-alpha A) in the treatment of disseminated malignant melanoma. Analysis of complete and long-term responding patients

Ninety-six patients with disseminated malignant melanoma received thrice weekly intramuscular injections of leukocyte A recombinant interferon (rIFN-alpha A, Roferon-A, Hoffmann La Roche) at doses of 12 X 10(6) U/m2 or 50 X 10(6) U/m2 with or without cimetidine as an immunorestorative agent. Four patients, two with prior chemotherapy, demonstrated either a complete response (3 months, soft tissue metastasis) or exceptionally durable response durations (months) of 29+ (soft tissue; lung lesion), 31+ (soft tissue), and 35+ (soft tissue; liver lesions). None of these patients had particularly characteristic clinical parameters. As noted previously, using chemotherapy, a small proportion of patients with advanced malignant melanoma, despite prior therapy, may achieve prolonged objective regression with rIFN-alpha A.

Phase II study of bleomycin, actinomycin D, DTIC and vindesine in disseminated malignant melanoma

Twenty-seven patients with disseminated malignant melanoma were treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of bleomycin, actinomycin D, DTIC and vindesine. There were 4 complete responses in patients with pulmonary metastasis, 5 patients had a partial remission, 2 of them had mainly lung lesions. Toxicity consisted mainly of leuco- and thrombocytopenia of short duration and sporadic severe mucositis.

Combination chemotherapy with dacarbazine and lomustine in disseminated malignant melanoma

Thirty-eight patients with disseminated malignant melanoma (stage IV) who had not received previous chemotherapy were given lomustine 50 to 80 mg/m2 orally on day 1 and dacarbazine 400 mg intravenously on days 1 to 3 with intervals of 6 weeks. Three of the 36 evaluable patients showed complete response (8%), 4 partial response (11%), and 5 had stable disease for at least 3 months (13%). The responding patients had metastases confined to cutaneous, nodal or pulmonary sites. None of the patients with liver, osseous or cerebral metastases, or patients with Karnofsky's status of less than 80, responded. Patients with more than two years from the diagnosis to the start of the chemotherapy were more likely to achieve objective response (p less than 0.05). Eighty-four per cent of the patients had nausea or vomiting, but otherwise toxicity was minimal.

Phase II study: the combination DTIC, BCNU, actinomycin D, and vincristine in disseminated malignant melanoma

Thirty patients with disseminated malignant melanoma received the combination DTIC, BCNU, actinomycin D, and vincristine. The objective response rate was 17 percent concomitant with moderate-to-severe nausea and vomiting in 80 percent of patients. Hematologic toxicity was transient. In the dose and schedule that we used, the four-drug regimen does not offer meaningful benefit for patients with advanced melanoma.

Phase II study of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (rIFN-alpha A) in disseminated malignant melanoma

Thirty-one patients with disseminated malignant melanoma received intramuscular recombinant leukocyte A interferon (rIFN-alpha A), 50 X 10(6) units/m2 three times weekly for a planned treatment duration of 3 months. Seven objective regressions (23%), which ranged in duration from 3 to 11.2+ months, were observed. Forty-two percent of 12 patients who were fully active (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance score, 0) responded compared to 11% of 19 patients with impairment of performance status (ECOG, 1-3). Prior chemotherapy did not influence response rate. For all patients the median time to progression and of survival was 2 months and 6 months, respectively. Four patients had partial regressions in soft tissue (3, 4.6 months), pulmonary (7 months), and prostatic lesions (3 months). The latter was biopsy-proven and assessed by serial computerized tomography (CT) scans. Three had complete regressions of soft tissue disease (2 patients, 6.4 and 10+ months each), and liver involvement (11.2+ months). The major toxicities were moderate to severe fatigue (87%), anorexia (58%), and confusion (23%). Performance score deteriorated in 84% of patients during the time they were receiving rIFN-alpha A. Among the 13 patients whose tumors did not progress for at least 12 weeks, 7 required dose reductions or termination of treatment due to toxicities. Hematologic and hepatic toxicity was transient and of little clinical significance. The study indicates that rIFN-alpha A has some antitumor activity accompanied by difficult side effects in patients with disseminated malignant melanoma.

Weekly Cisplatin during cranial irradiation for malignant melanoma metastatic to brain

Because Cisplatin potentiates the effect of radiotherapy in animal tumor systems and because Cisplatin is capable of causing regressions of human malignant melanomas, a study was initiated in patients with malignant melanoma metastatic to brain to investigate the feasibility of administering Cisplatin once a week during cranial irradiation. Cisplatin 40 mg/m2/week (three doses) was given I.V. to 18 patients during whole brain irradiation, 3 000 rads in 12 fractions over 21/2 weeks. Eleven patients also received Cisplatin 120 mg/m2 every three weeks, starting three weeks after cranial irradiation. Median survival was ten weeks, and only one of 13 patients whose brain metastases had not been resected experienced neurological and CT scan improvement. Thirteen patients have died, and brain metastases were a major cause. No regression of extracerebral tumor was seen in 15 patients with evaluable extracerebral lesions. During weekly low-dose Cisplatin administration, nausea and vomiting were moderate to severe. No granulocytopenia was noted, although three courses were associated with mild thrombocytopenia. Mucositis, peri orbital swelling, vertigo, and headache were each noted in two of 51 courses of treatment and seizures, ototoxicity, pancreatitis, and hiccups were each noted in one course. Renal toxicity and ototoxicity each developed in three of the 11 patients receiving Cisplatin 120 mg/m2, and nausea and vomiting were severe.

Effects of dopamine agonists and antagonists on murine melanoma: correlation with dopamine binding activity

The biosynthetic pathway melanin is present in many melanomas. Previous investigations have suggested that pharmacologic levels of intermediates in this pathway (L-dopa, dopamine, and their analogues) may inhibit macromolecular synthesis in some tissue culture melanoma cell lines and prolong survival in tumor-bearing mice. Recently, a potent antidopamine drug (pimozide) has been developed. This study was designed to investigate the effects of these drugs on murine melanomas and to correlate effects on macromolecular synthesis with competitive dopamine binding activity (receptors) and melanin synthesis. Three murine melanomas (F1, F10, B16) were studied. The amelanotic B16 cell line showed no inhibition by dopa, dopamine, or pimozide when assayed for 14C-leu or 3H-TdR incorporation. Using a competitive binding assay, only low levels of dopamine binding were present. The very melanotic F1 cell line showed no inhibition by dopa or dopamine, but pimozide inhibited 14C-leu and 3H-TdR incorporation in a dose-response fashion; 50% inhibition was noted at 10(-9) M concentration with no loss in cell viability as tested by trypan blue exclusion or cell counting. Competitive dopamine binding was present (19 pmoles per g of wet tissue) with a Kd of 0.2 nM, figures approximating those seen in normal dog caudate nucleus controls. The F10 line, with melanin production between the B16 and F1, was intermediate in terms of inhibition of 14C-leu and 3H-TdR incorporation and dopamine binding. Purified melanin did not bind and, thus, does not appear to explain these binding results. These data suggest that pimozide, a drug which is a potent dopamine antagonist, may inhibit 14C-leu and 3H-TdR incorporation in murine melanoma cells and that competitive dopamine binding (receptor) appears to correlate with this inhibition. This drug and the dopamine binding assay may be useful in the study of human melanoma.

A phase II study of chlorozotocin in metastatic malignant melanoma

Thirty-five patients with metastatic malignant melanoma underwent treatment with chlorozotocin administered as a single dose of 120 mg/m2 by means of rapid intravenous infusion every six weeks. There were 1 complete and 4 partial remissions with an overall response rate of 14%. The median duration of response was 18 weeks; the patient in complete remission continues disease-free in excess of 42 weeks. The sites of response included: lung, 2; subcutaneous, 2; and lymph node, 1. There was minimal myelotoxicity: for the first cycle, the median white blood cell count nadir was 5400/mm3, and the platelet nadir was 210,000/mm3. No evidence of cumulative platelet toxicity was observed. Chlorozotocin is active against metastatic melanoma to the same degree as other chloroethylnitrosoureas in clinical use, but without causing bone marrow toxicity. These data suggest that chlorozotocin should be evaluated in combination with other agents active against melanoma.