The effect of postoperative and primary radiation therapy on delivered dose of adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy in breast cancer

Impact of Concurrent Radiotherapy on Chemotherapy Total Dose and Dose Intensity in Patients with Early Breast Cancer

Aims and background

A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the tolerability as well as the impact of concurrent adjuvant CMF chemotherapy and radiation therapy on total CMF dose and dose intensity.

Methods

The medical records of 59 patients who had received conservative or radical surgery for breast cancer were analyzed. All patients had been assigned to 6 cycles of “1,8 CMF” adjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant radiation therapy. Total drug dose and dose intensity were calculated. Toxicity was recorded scored according to WHO criteria.

Results

A total of 355 cycles was administered. Fifty of 59 patients received at least 85% of the programmed chemotherapy total dose, the median value being 100% (range, 42-100). The median relative dose intensity was 0.97 (range, 0.42-1.01). Forty-four of 59 (75%) patients experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (20 febrile neutropenia) and 29 (49%) required G-CSF support.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis showed that it is possible to give concurrent CMF and breast radiation while ensuring adequate chemotherapy total doses and dose intensities to most patients. However, G-CSF support is required in a significant proportion of patients.

Nonrandomized Comparison between Concomitant and Sequential Chemoradiotherapy with Anthracyclines in Breast Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the tolerance of concomitant administration of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CHT) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery.

Methods and Materials

Sixty-seven patients, treated with conservative surgery followed by 3-dimensional whole breast RT and concomitant CHT regimens including “Canadian modified” CEF (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) or AC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) were evaluated for toxicity. They were compared in terms in compliance and acute toxicity with 67 patients irradiated sequentially after having received anthracyclines.

Results

Acute grade ≥2 skin toxicity was significantly higher in the concomitant group compared to the sequential group, although the incidence of Grade 3 desquamation showed no statistical difference (9% vs. 3%, p = 0.14). Haematological toxicity represented the main cause of treatment discontinuation, reporting higher rate of grade 3-4 leuco-neutropenia in the concomitant group (20.9% vs. 6%, p = 0.01). Mean RT duration was longer in the concomitant group (51 days vs. 45 days) owing to RT breaks. Late toxicity was acceptable. No symptomatic lung and heart events were reported. Radiological lung hyperdensity was detected in 27.7% of the patients in the concomitant group. Post-treatment left ventricular ejection fraction significantly decreased compared with baseline, but cardiac function remained within the normal range, without any difference between left or right-sided RT.

Conclusions

Although there was more acute grade ≥2 skin toxicity in the concomitant group, the rate of grade 3 dermatitis was lower than expected, suggesting some advantages of 3-D CRT over older techniques. Haematological toxicity exerted a significant impact on both RT and CHT delivery.

Concurrent sequencing of full-dose CMF chemotherapy and radiation therapy in early breast cancer has no effect on treatment delivery

With the increasing use of breast-conserving therapy plus systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of early breast cancer, the optimal sequencing of radiation therapy and chemotherapy remains controversial. Sequencing of therapy may influence not only treatment delivery, but control rates, complications and cosmesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether concurrent sequencing of standard doses of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) and adjuvant radiation therapy for early breast cancer impacted on optimum treatment delivery. As both an intravenous (i.v.) 3-week regimen and classic (standard) CMF were utilised in this study, both types of CMF were compared. The effect of sequencing on complications and treatment delays were also assessed. 116 patients treated with CMF chemotherapy and adjuvant tangent breast radiation were studied. 73 patients were treated prospectively with concurrent therapy and were retrospectively compared with a matched group of 40 patients treated with sequential or sandwich therapy. All patients had stage 1 or 2 cancers. There were no planned dose reductions introduced for either treatment modality. Concurrent sequencing had no impact on the ability to deliver optimum radiation or chemotherapy doses. There was no significant difference in acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) skin reactions or complications between the two groups. Although small, there was a significant delay (1.32 days (0-15 versus 0.36 (0-7)) in the concurrent group (P=0.03) in the delivery of radiation therapy. Sequencing had no significant effect on haematological parameters. 'Standard' CMF had a more profound effect on treatment delivery than i.v. CMF (Radiation delay 2.2 days versus 0.26, P=0.002, % chemotherapy delivered 93% versus 99% P=0.000004). At a mean follow-up of 2.6 years, there was no difference in the cosmetic scores between the two groups. Both local and distant control rates were excellent. This study has shown that standard radiation therapy can be delivered safely concurrently with CMF chemotherapy. Whether this approach may lead to better control rates in the future needs further study.

Radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer: impact on local recurrence and overall survival

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have renewed an old controversy about the efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy following mastectomy for breast cancer. Radiotherapy is usually recommended for advanced disease, but whether or not to use it in pT1-T2 pN0 situations is still being debated. This study was designed to clarify whether or not routine radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy reduces the risk of local recurrence and if it influences the overall survival rate.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with mastectomy for pT1-T2 pN0 tumors and no systemic treatment. Patients treated with radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy (Group A) are compared with those treated with mastectomy alone (Group B).

RESULTS

A total of 918 patients underwent mastectomy. Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy (n = 114) had a significantly lower risk for local recurrence. Ten years after the primary diagnosis, 98.1% of the patients with radiotherapy were disease free compared to 86.4% of the patients without radiotherapy. The average time interval from primary diagnosis until local recurrence was 8.9 years in Group A and 2.8 years in Group B. The Cox regression analysis including radiotherapy, tumor size and tumor grading found the highest risk for local recurrence for patients without radiotherapy (p < 0.0004). In terms of overall survival however, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.8787) and the Cox regression analysis failed to show any impact on overall survival.

CONCLUSION

With observation spanning over 35 years, this study shows that adjuvant radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy reduces the risk for local recurrence in node-negative patients with pT1-T2 tumors but has no impact on the overall survival rate.

Feasibility of a dose-intensive CMF regimen with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer

Our aim was to study the feasibility of an intensified intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) schedule with the aim to escalate dose intensity (DI). Twenty-three premenopausal breast cancer patients received 6 cycles of adjuvant CMF intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor days 9-18. Endpoints were DI and toxicity. Twenty-one out of 23 patients (91%) received the projected total dose and reached > or =85% of the projected DI. Compared to 'classical' CMF, all patients reached > or = 111% DI. Nine patients received the planned schedule without delay. Thirteen patients (57%) were treated for infection and four patients (17%) were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. Twelve patients received red blood cell transfusions (52%). Radiation therapy (n = 6) had no adverse impact on dose intensity or haematological toxicity. This dose-intensified CMF schedule was accompanied by enhanced haematological toxicity with clinical sequelae, namely fever, intravenous antibiotics and red blood cell transfusions, but allows a high dose intensity in a majority of patients.

Conservation Therapy of the Breast: Optimizing Long-term Results

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy is a key component of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. There is great interest in safety and long-term outcome issues for this still underutilized approach. METHODS: The author reviews a series of factors that may affect the end results of conservation therapy and highlights those that are likely to be of clinical significance. RESULTS: Daily dose fractions are usually less than 2 Gy and a homogeneous whole-breast dose is used. Care is needed with patients with collagen vascular diseases, large breasts, breast trauma, and prior infections, but these factors are not absolute contraindications to breast conservation therapy. Acute skin reactions are not predictive of long-term complications. CONCLUSIONS: With adherence to proper surgical and radiation techniques, most patients presenting with localized breast cancer can be managed safely and effectively with breast conservation.

Simultaneous adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer--toxicity and dose modification: a Transtasman Radiation Oncology Group Multi-Institution study

PURPOSE

To establish the toxicity profile of simultaneously administered postoperative radiation therapy and CMF chemotherapy as a prelude to a randomized controlled study addressing the sequencing of the two modalities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and thirty eight breast cancer patients at high risk of locoregional, as well as systemic relapse, who were referred to three centers in Australia and New Zealand were treated with postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy simultaneously. Acute toxicity and dose modifications in these patients were compared with 83 patients treated over the same time frame with chemotherapy alone. In a separate study the long-term radiation and surgical effects in 24 patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy at Newcastle (Australia) following conservative surgery were compared with 23 matched patients treated at Newcastle with radiation therapy alone.

RESULTS

Myelotoxicity was increased in patients treated simultaneously with radiation therapy and chemotherapy. The effect was not great, but may have contributed to chemotherapy dose reductions. Lymphopenia was observed to be the largest factor in total white cell depressions caused by the simultaneous administration of radiation therapy. Postsurgical appearances were found to so dominate long-term treatment effects on the treated breast that the effect of radiation therapy dose and additional chemotherapy was difficult to detect.

CONCLUSION

Studies addressing the sequencing of radiation therapy and chemotherapy will necessarily be large because adverse effects from administering the two modalities simultaneously are not great. The present study has endorsed the importance in future studies of stratification according to the extent and type of surgery and adherence to a single strict policy of chemotherapy dose modification.

Medical management of early-stage breast cancer

With improved screening and education, a greater proportion of breast cancer is detected at an early stage. Although the prognosis for many of these patients is excellent following definitive local therapy alone, some subsets of node-negative patients have a 30% chance of eventually developing metastatic disease that will be incurable with current therapy. Thus, an increasing proportion of early-stage patients are being offered some form of adjuvant therapy, with the expectation of improved relapse-free survival, and possibly improved overall survival. Efforts have been made to base the selection of patients for adjuvant therapy on specific prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the scope and complexity of putative prognostic factors continues to widen, and now includes such items as the presence of occult microscopic metastases, DNA ploidy and proliferative fraction, cytogenetic abnormalities, oncogene expression, growth factor receptors, and expression of hormonally regulated proteins. In addition, there is now a considerable range of options with regard to the composition, dose intensity, and sequence of multimodality therapy. Data regarding the classification, significance, and interpretation of prognostic factors is reviewed together with the development, current status, and recommendations regarding adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer. For 1991, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has estimated that 175,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in American women. It is also estimated that 44,500 women will die of breast cancer. Unfortunately, the age-adjusted death rate from breast cancer has shown no overall change from 1930 through 1987. However, effective screening techniques continue to identify an increasing percentage of early-stage tumors, which should exceed 50% of all new tumors in 1991. Ultimately, our understanding of environmental and genetic risk factors may identify new ways to reduce the impact of this disease. In the interim, development and application of effective systemic adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy has become increasingly important. There is no question that a greater proportion of patients with less extensive disease are now being offered some form of adjuvant therapy. Meanwhile, selection of patients for adjuvant therapy, and choice among specific adjuvant regimens, has remained controversial. Analysis of multiple prognostic factors is performed not only in the context of cooperative investigational trials, but more often in the offices of individual physicians caring for individual patients. Tumor biopsies can now be routinely sent to specialized laboratories for performance of complex assays with potential prognostic information, although interpretation of these results with reference to a specific patient is often uncertain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Concomitant adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for high risk breast cancer patients

Thirty four patients treated with mastectomy and axillary node dissection for potentially curable breast cancer received a seven month combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy program. These patients were considered to be at high risk for recurrence because they had either three or more positive axillary lymph nodes or their primary tumor was greater than 5 cm in diameter. The chemotherapy given at 3-week intervals consisted of cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2, Adriamycin 40 mg/m2, and methotrexate 40 mg/m2 during cycles 1 through 3 and 7 through 9. Radiation therapy was administered during cycles 4 through 6 with concomitant administration of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 for 7 days. Median follow up time from initiation of study is 60 months (range 36-93). Seventeen of 34 patients (50%) remain free of recurrent breast cancer. Distant metastases and local-regional recurrence have occurred in 16 (47%) and 4 (12%) patients, respectively. Significant myelosuppression and infections requiring hospitalization were seen in 4 patients, with 1 treatment-related death. Adriamycin-containing chemotherapy and post-operative radiotherapy can thus be combined in an adjuvant treatment program with acceptable toxicity.

Conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

In 1984, as part of a prior American Cancer Society National Conference on Breast Cancer, the authors reported on the status of conservative surgery (CS) and radiotherapy (RT) as primary local treatment for women with early stage breast cancer. Since that time, additional data have become available regarding the use of this approach and its comparability to mastectomy. In general, these data support the use of CS and RT and, as a result, this approach is now more widely employed in the United States and abroad than it was in 1984. The current focus of inquiry has shifted from whether or not CS and RT is an acceptable option for patients with early stage breast cancer to the following questions. For which patients are CS and RT suitable? What are the best techniques of surgery and RT? Are there any patients who can be treated safely with CS without RT? How should RT and systemic therapy be integrated when both are to be used? In this report, recent results on the use of CS and RT from both retrospective and prospective trials are summarized, and these current areas of inquiry are addressed.

Radiotherapy for the prevention of local-regional recurrence in high risk patients post mastectomy receiving adjuvant chemotherapy

From 1977 to 1986, 63 patients at high risk for isolated local-regional recurrence following mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy received post-operative radiotherapy. All patients had operable primary tumors (T1-3a). For entire group the mean and median number of positive nodes were 10 and 8, respectively. Radiotherapy consisted of 4500 to 5000 rad to the chest wall and regional nodes. Chemotherapy consisted of CMF +/- prednisone (45 patients), CAF (16 patients), and other variable regimens (2 patients). Relapse occurred in 23 patients with only two patients experiencing an isolated local-regional recurrence. In 3 patients local-regional recurrence appeared simultaneously with or following distant metastases and in 18 patients the pattern of failure was distant metastases alone. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 9-87 mo.), 40 patients are alive without disease, 9 are alive with disease, and 14 have died with disease. The 4-year actuarial overall survival is 67% and the 4-year actuarial disease-free survival is 47%. The 4-year actuarial probability of an isolated local-regional recurrence is 5%. Complications related to the radiation included a 9% incidence of moderate to severe arm edema. This study demonstrates the ability of radiation to reduce the incidence of local-regional recurrence in a previously identified high risk group of patients and has produced encouraging survival results with minimal morbidity.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after conservative surgery plus irradiation versus modified radical mastectomy. Analysis of drug dosing and toxicity

In a cohort of 764 evaluable patients with primary breast cancer, we have compared the ability to deliver full doses of adjuvant chemotherapy in two patient groups: one undergoing conservative breast surgery plus irradiation and the other having modified radical mastectomy as primary treatment for the cancer. We have also analyzed the toxicities of the concurrent radiation and chemotherapy. The group having irradiation had significantly more moderate leucopenia, which caused a short delay (median, three weeks) in the overall time necessary to complete the planned chemotherapy. However, among those patients who completed the planned chemotherapy cycles, the fraction who received more than 85 percent average drug doses was 96 percent or higher in all but one small subgroup. Interaction between the irradiation and chemotherapy caused mild breast skin reactions in 42 percent of patients so analyzed and worse reactions in 12 percent. When follow-up tracings were performed, mild electrocardiogram abnormalities occurred in 19 percent of patients, apparently because of the irradiation. We conclude that intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy, as administered in this study, can be delivered as intensely with conservative primary treatment as after mastectomy and that toxicity is mild, rarely requiring intervention or treatment discontinuation.

Exclusion of an interactive effect of combined x-irradiation and activated cyclophosphamide in tissue culture

The effect of Cyclophosphamide (CY) on the X ray survival of clonogenic tumor cells has been studied in vitro. Two activated derivatives of the drug, Peroxycyclophosphamide and Hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, were employed. Two cell lines, repair-competent human HeLa cells and the repair-deficient rat REQ line, were investigated. Neither form of CY had any effect on the X ray survival curve of either cell line, indicating that any interaction anticipated in vivo could be expected to be additive.

Patterns of metastasis and natural courses of breast carcinoma

Breast carcinoma is known to metastatize to all organs. In order to understand the patterns of spread and natural courses, this review summarizes detailed studies of patients with various stages of the disease. After treatment of early breast carcinoma (stage I, II, and some III), the recurrent lesion can be classified as local, regional, distant, or combinations thereof. The sites of dissemination of patients presenting with stage IV disease and of those who had autopsy after diagnosis of breast cancer are presented for comparison. Clinicopathological factors that influence the relative incidence, specific site, subsequent event, and prognosis of recurrent and metastatic breast cancers are discussed.