Upper abdominal computerized tomography scanning in staging non-small cell lung carcinoma

Current perspectives on the diversification of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has undergone significant advancements since it was first reported in 1992. Initially focused on the pancreas, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has now been extended to encompass all organs proximal to the gastrointestinal system. Recently, a novel fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle with an end-cut tip was developed, allowing for the collection of specimens suitable for histological assessment, a feat hard to achieve with traditional needles. The FNB needle holds promise for applications in immunohistochemistry staining and genetics evaluation, and it has the potential to yield specimens of comparable quality to core needle biopsy during percutaneous puncture, especially for lesions beyond the pancreas, such as lymph nodes. This review focuses on the efficacy of EUS-FNA/FNB for extended target regions, specifically lymph nodes, spleen, adrenal gland, and ascites. The indications for EUS-FNA have greatly expanded beyond the pancreas over the years, and future improvements and innovations in puncture needles will allow for the collection of higher-quality specimens, which is expected to play a significant part in personalized cancer treatment.

Clinical Applications of Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Scope: Challenges and Opportunities

Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) has been widely used to stage lung tumors and to diagnose mediastinal diseases. In the last decade, this procedure has evolved in several technical aspects, with new tools available to optimize tissue sampling and to increase its diagnostic yield, like elastography, different types of needles and, most recently, miniforceps and cryobiopsy. Accordingly, the indications for the use of the EBUS scope into the airways to perform the Endobronchial Ultrasound-TransBronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has also extended beyond the endobronchial and thoracic boundaries to sample lesions from the liver, left adrenal gland and retroperitoneal lymph nodes via the gastroesophageal tract, performing the Endoscopic UltraSound with Bronchoscope-guided Fine Needle Aspiration (EUS-B-FNA). In this review, we summarize and critically discuss the main indication for the use of the EBUS scope, even the more uncommon, to underline its utility and versatility in clinical practice.

Metastases or benign adrenal lesions in patients with histopathological verification of lung cancer: Can CT texture analysis distinguish?

INTRODUCTION

Distant metastases are found in the many of patients with lung cancer at time of diagnosis. Several diagnostic tools are available to distinguish between metastatic spread and benign lesions in the adrenal gland. However, all require additional diagnostic steps after the initial CT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if texture analysis of CT-abnormal adrenal glands on the initial CT correctly differentiates between malignant and benign lesions in patients with confirmed lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study 160 patients with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy from the left adrenal gland and a contrast-enhanced CT in portal venous phase were assessed with texture analysis. A region of interest encircling the entire adrenal gland was used and from this dataset the slice with the largest cross section of the lesion was analyzed individually.

RESULTS

Several texture parameters showed statistically significantly difference between metastatic and benign lesions but with considerable between-groups overlaps in confidence intervals. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using ROC-curves, and in univariate binary logistic regression the area under the curve ranged from 36 % (Kurtosis 0.5) to 69 % (Entropy 2.5) compared to 73 % in the best fitting model using multivariate binary logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

In lung cancer patients with abnormal adrenal gland at imaging, adrenal gland texture analyses appear not to have any role in discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

The role of percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of an adrenal lesion in patients with known or suspected lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and complication rate of percutaneous adrenal biopsy in patients with known or suspected lung cancer.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institution as a retrospective analysis; therefore, the need for informed consent was waived. All percutaneous adrenal biopsies performed between April 1993 and May 2019 were reviewed. 357 of 582 biopsies were performed on 343 patients with known or suspected lung cancer (M:F 164:179; mean age 66 years). The biopsy results were classified into malignant, benign, or non-diagnostic. The final diagnosis was established by pathology (biopsy and/or surgical resection) or imaging follow-up on CT for at least 12 months following the biopsy. Patients with less than 12 months follow-up were excluded (n = 44). Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis was metastatic lung cancer in 235 cases (77.8%), metastasis from an extrapulmonary primary in 2 cases (0.7%), pheochromocytoma in 2 cases (0.7%), and benign lesions in 63 cases (20.9%). Percutaneous adrenal gland biopsy had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 100% for lung cancer metastases. The non-diagnostic rate was 0.6%. Larger lesions were more likely to be malignant (p = 0.0000) and to be correctly classified as a lung metastasis (p = 0.025). The incidence of minor complications was 1.1%. There were no major complications.

CONCLUSION

Over 20% of adrenal lesions in patients with known or suspected lung cancer were not related to lung cancer. Percutaneous adrenal gland biopsy is a safe procedure, with high sensitivity and specificity for lung cancer metastases.

EUS-B for suspected left adrenal metastasis in lung cancer

Background

Several studies have reported the efficacy of esophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the detection of metastases in the left adrenal gland (LAG) in patients with lung cancer. Currently we have only limited evidence based on small studies on the usefulness of EUS-B [endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope into the esophagus] to provide tissue proof of suspected LAG metastases. The objectives of this study are to investigate feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of EUS-B-FNA in LAG analysis in patients with proven or suspected lung cancer.

Methods

In two Danish hospitals, a systematic search in the electronic database for patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA of the LAG for suspected or proven lung cancer was performed retrospectively between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2017. Computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT, endoscopy, pathology and follow-up data were acquired.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five patients were included; the prevalence of biopsy proven LAG malignancy was 30% (40/135). A total of 87% (117/135) of EUS-B-FNA samples were adequate (i.e., containing adrenal or malignant cells). No complications were observed.

Conclusions

We present the largest cohort of patients ever reported showing that EUS-B-FNA of the LAG is a safe and feasible procedure and should therefore be used for staging purposes in patients with lung cancer and a suspicious LAG.

EUS-B-FNA for Diagnosing Liver and Celiac Metastases in Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients with suspected or proven lung cancer, assessment of regional nodal and distant metastases is key before treatment planning. By introducing the endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided scope into the esophagus and stomach (EUS-B), liver lesions and celiac nodes can be visualized. To date, the utility of EUS-B in diagnosing liver lesions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of sampling of liver lesions and retroperitoneal nodes by EUS-B fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in a lung cancer staging setting.

METHOD

Consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer in 2 Danish centers between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were included retrospectively when a lesion in the liver or a retroperitoneal lymph node was visualized and biopsied with EUS-B-FNA.

RESULTS

23 left liver lobe lesions and 19 retroperitoneal lymph nodes were sampled by EUS-B-FNA. Sensitivity and diagnostic yield of sampled liver lesions were 86 and 83%, respectively. In 19/23 patients, there was a cytopathological diagnosis of malignancy. Sensitivity and diagnostic yield from retroperitoneal lymph node samples were 83 and 63%, respectively. In 10/19 patients, the diagnosis was malignancy. No complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA enables safe sampling of left liver lobe lesions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. EUS-B should be considered as a minimally invasive technique to provide tissue proof of distant metastases lung cancer patients.

EUS-guided tissue acquisition in the study of the adrenal glands: Results of a nationwide multicenter study

Background

There are limited data about the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), by fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) or biopsy (EUS-FNB), in the evaluation of the adrenal glands (AG). The primary aim was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety. The secondary aims were the malignancy predictors, and to create a predictive model of malignancy.

Methods

This was a retrospective nationwide study involving all Spanish hospitals experienced in EUS-TA of AGs. Inclusion period was from April-2003 to April-2016. Inclusion criteria: all consecutive cases that underwent EUS-TA of AGs. EUS and cytopathology findings were evaluated. Statistical analyses: diagnostic accuracy of echoendoscopist’s suspicion using cytology by EUS-TA, as gold standard; multivariate logistic regression model to predict tumor malignancy.

Results

A total of 204 EUS-TA of AGs were evaluated. Primary tumor locations were lung70%, others19%, and unknown11%. AG samples were adequate for cytological diagnosis in 91%, and confirmed malignancy in 60%. Diagnostic accuracy of the endosonographer's suspicion was 68%.

The most common technique was: a 22-G (65%) and cytological needle (75%) with suction-syringe (66%). No serious adverse events were described. The variables most associated with malignancy were size>30mm (OR2.27; 95%CI, 1.16–4.05), heterogeneous echo-pattern (OR2.11; 95%CI, 1.1–3.9), variegated AG shape (OR2.46; 95%CI, 1–6.24), and endosonographer suspicion (OR17.46; 95%CI, 6.2–58.5). The best variables for a predictive multivariate logistic model of malignancy were age, sex, echo-pattern, and AG-shape.

Conclusions

EUS-TA of the AGs is a safe, minimally invasive procedure, allowing an excellent diagnostic yield. These results suggest the possibility of developing a pre-EUS procedure predictive malignancy model.

Performance characteristics of EUS-FNA biopsy for adrenal lesions: A meta-analysis

Background and Objective:

The role of EUS-FNA biopsy (EUS-FNAB) for detection of metastatic lesions (mets) to adrenals has not been evaluated systematically. Our aim is to systematically evaluate the performance characteristics of EUS-FNAB in detecting metastasis to the adrenal glands.

Materials and Methods:

We performed a systematic search on PubMed and OvidSP from January 1990 to July 2016 using various search terms for EUS and adrenal lesion. Only articles published in English literature were included in the study. Studies with fewer than 10 patients were excluded from the study. Publication bias was assessed using Begg-Mazumdar test and visual inspection of funnel plots.

Results:

Eight studies including 360 adrenal lesions that underwent EUS-FNAB were identified. Of these, 137 FNABs were conclusive for malignancy. Sensitivity of EUS-FNAB in detecting metastasis to the adrenals was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 90%–98%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI: 96%–100%). Pooled positivity of EUS-FNAB in detecting lung cancer metastasis to the adrenals was 44% (95% CI: 31.5%–57.3%). No evidence of publication bias was noted.

Conclusion:

Our study demonstrates that EUS-FNAB is highly sensitive and specific in detecting metastasis to adrenals. It also shows that up to about half of the patients with lung cancer and adrenal lesions on imaging have metastasis, a finding with profound implications on lung cancer staging and treatment.

Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies and invasive tests are available. Understanding the accuracy, advantages, and disadvantages of the available methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer is critical to decision-making.

METHODS

Test accuracies for the available staging studies were updated from the second iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Lung Cancer Guidelines. Systematic searches of the MEDLINE database were performed up to June 2012 with the inclusion of selected meta-analyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were approximately 55% and 81%, respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were approximately 77% and 86%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning, but tissue biopsy is still required to confirm PET scan findings. The needle techniques endobronchial ultrasound-needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration, and combined endobronchial ultrasound/endoscopic ultrasound-needle aspiration have sensitivities of approximately 89%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. In direct comparison with surgical staging, needle techniques have emerged as the best first diagnostic tools to obtain tissue. Based on randomized controlled trials, PET or PET-CT scanning is recommended for staging and to detect unsuspected metastatic disease and avoid noncurative resections.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the last iteration of the staging guidelines, PET scanning has assumed a more prominent role both in its use prior to surgery and when evaluating for metastatic disease. Minimally invasive needle techniques to stage the mediastinum have become increasingly accepted and are the tests of first choice to confirm mediastinal disease in accessible lymph node stations. If negative, these needle techniques should be followed by surgical biopsy. All abnormal scans should be confirmed by tissue biopsy (by whatever method is available) to ensure accurate staging. Evidence suggests that more complete staging improves patient outcomes.

EUS-FNA for the detection of left adrenal metastasis in patients with lung cancer

In patients with lung cancer, enlarged or (18)Fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) positive left adrenal glands are suspected for distant metastases and require tissue confirmation for a definitive assessment. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for left adrenal metastases in lung cancer patients with a suspect adrenal gland based on imaging. EUS-FNA findings of patients with (suspected) lung cancer and CT enlarged or (18)FDG-PET positive left adrenal glands were retrospectively evaluated. In the absence of metastases at EUS, clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained. In 85 patients, EUS-FNA demonstrated left adrenal metastases of lung cancer in 53 (62%), benign adrenal tissue in 25 (29%), a metastasis from colon carcinoma in 1 (1%) and a primary adrenocortical carcinoma in 1 (1%) patient. In five patients (5.9%), the aspirates contained non-representative material. EUS outcomes were false negative in two patients. Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) for EUS-FNA of the left adrenal gland were at least 86% (95% CI 74-93%) and 70% (95% CI 50-85%). No complications occurred. EUS-FNA is a sensitive, safe and minimally invasive technique to provide tissue proof of left adrenal metastases in patients with (suspected) lung cancer and enlarged or (18)FDG-PET positive adrenal glands. Therefore, EUS-FNA qualifies as the staging test of choice for patients with lung cancer with suspected left adrenal metastases.

(18)F-FDG PET versus (18)F-FDG PET/CT for adrenal gland lesion characterization: a comparison of diagnostic efficacy in lung cancer patients

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic efficacy of integrated PET/CT using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for the differentiation of benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in patients with lung cancer and to compare the diagnostic efficacy with the use of PET alone.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-one adrenal lesions (size range, 5-104 mm; mean size, 16 mm) were evaluated retrospectively in 42 lung cancer patients. Both PET images alone and integrated PET/CT images were assessed, respectively, at two-month intervals. PET findings were interpreted as positive if the FDG uptake of adrenal lesions was greater than or equal to that of the liver, and the PET/CT findings were interpreted as positive if an adrenal lesion show attenuation > 10 HU and showed increased FDG uptake. Final diagnoses of adrenal gland lesions were made at clinical follow-up (n = 52) or by a biopsy (n = 9) when available. The diagnostic accuracies of PET and PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal lesions were compared using the McNemar test.

Results

Thirty-five (57%) of the 61 adrenal lesions were metastatic and the remaining 26 lesions were benign. For the depiction of adrenal gland metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET were 74%, 73%, and 74%, respectively, whereas those of integrated PET/CT were 80%, 89%, and 84%, respectively (p values; 0.5, 0.125, and 0.031, respectively).

Conclusion

The use of integrated PET/CT is more accurate than the use of PET alone for differentiating benign and metastatic adrenal gland lesions in lung cancer patients.

Preoperative evaluation of adrenal lesions based on imaging studies and laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with otherwise operable lung cancer

PURPOSE

An unsuspected adrenal mass (AM) could be discovered in patients with operable non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), but it is difficult to determine the nature of AM. The purpose of the study is to answer the question as to which decision should be made when assessing AM in patients with NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2005, 40 patients (31 male; mean age: 63 years) were identified to have both NSCLC and AM. We tried to determine the nature of AM based on imaging studies with or without laparoscopic adrenalectomy. When AM was considered benign on CT or PET-CT, surgical resection of NSCLC was performed (group 1, n=25). When AM was considered indeterminate on CT or PET-CT, we performed MRI to determine the operability. In eight patients, surgical resection of NSCLC was performed, because AM was considered benign on MRI (group 2). In seven patients, adrenalectomy was performed to confirm AM pathologically, because all imaging studies were indeterminate (group 3).

RESULTS

Follow-up was complete for all patients with a mean duration of 33.1 months (3-104.5). In group 1, no patients showed adrenal metastases, except one who died of adrenal metastasis. In group 2, three patients revealed that they had had adrenal metastases when staging and two died of adrenal metastasis. In group 3, one patient had an adrenal metastasis and the others had benign lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that when AM is considered benign on CT or PET-CT, surgical resection of NSCLC is indicated. However, when AM is indeterminate on CT or PET-CT, histopathologic confirmation is needed to determine the nature of AM.

Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

BACKGROUND

Correctly staging lung cancer is important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies including chest CT scanning and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning are available. Understanding the test characteristics of these noninvasive staging studies is critical to decision making.

METHODS

Test characteristics for the noninvasive staging studies were updated from the first iteration of the lung cancer guidelines using systematic searches of the MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2006, including selected metaanalyses, practice guidelines, and reviews. Study designs and results are summarized in evidence tables.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for identifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47 to 54%) and 85% (95% CI, 84 to 88%), respectively, confirming that CT scanning has limited ability either to rule in or exclude mediastinal metastasis. For PET scanning, the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for identifying mediastinal metastasis were 74% (95% CI, 69 to 79%) and 85% (95% CI, 82 to 88%), respectively. These findings demonstrate that PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning. If the clinical evaluation in search of metastatic disease is negative, the likelihood of finding metastasis is low.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scanning of the chest is useful in providing anatomic detail, but the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is poor. PET scanning has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum, and distant metastatic disease can be detected by PET scanning. With either test, abnormal findings must be confirmed by tissue biopsy to ensure accurate staging.

Detecting extrathoracic metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Is routine scanning necessary?

There is controversy over whether to scan extrathoracic sites for metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We tested the efficiency of clinical factors to determine whether metastasis has occurred, and whether routine scanning for NSCLC is required. Nine hundred and forty five patients scanned for extrathoracic metasates were included. Clinical factors indicating metastasis were determined using multivariate analysis. Of the 945 cases, 377 (39.9%) had metastasis. Bone metastases were determined by focal skeleton pains, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels, adenocarcinoma, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 90.6, specificity of 12.7, PPV of 16.3, NPV of 87.8, and silent metastases rate (SMR) of 9.4%. Brain metastases were determined by neurological symptoms, adenocarcinoma, hematocrite <40 for men and <35 for women, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 89.9, specificity of 7.9, PPV of 9.2, NPV of 88.3, and SMR of 10.1%. Abdominal metastases were determined by abdominal pain/tension, hepatomegaly, elevated GGT levels, serum LDH levels >500 IU, a N2 or N3 case, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 95.9, specificity of 7.1, PPV of 13.3, NPV of 92.1 and SMR of 4.1%. Of the 224 patients with stage I and II disease, 73 had metastasis with a rate of 10.9% silent metastasis. We concluded that routine scanning of NSCLC for staging is necessary.

Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the test performance characteristics of CT scanning, positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for staging the mediastinum, and to evaluate the accuracy of the clinical evaluation (ie, symptoms, physical findings, or routine blood test results) for predicting metastatic disease in patients in whom non-small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer is diagnosed.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Systematic searches of MEDLINE, HealthStar, and Cochrane Library databases to July 2001, and of print bibliographies. Studies evaluating the staging results of CT scanning, PET scanning, MRI, or EUS, with either tissue histologic confirmation or long-term clinical follow-up, were included. The performance of the clinical evaluation was compared against the results of brain and abdominal CT scans and radionuclide bone scans.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

Pooled sensitivities and specificities for staging the mediastinum were as follows: for CT scanning: sensitivity, 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.66); specificity, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.86); for PET scanning: sensitivity, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.89); specificity, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.93); and for EUS: sensitivity, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89); specificity, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.82). For the evaluation of brain metastases, the summary estimate of the negative predictive value (NPV) of the clinical neurologic evaluation was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91 to 0.96). For detecting adrenal and/or liver metastases, the summary NPV of the clinical evaluation was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93 to 0.96), and for detecting bone metastases, it was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

PET scanning is more accurate than CT scanning or EUS for detecting mediastinal metastases. The NPVs of the clinical evaluations for brain, abdominal, and bone metastases are > or = 90%, suggesting that routinely imaging asymptomatic lung cancer patients may not be necessary. However, more definitive prospective studies that better define the patient population and improved reference standards are necessary to more accurately assess the true NPV of the clinical evaluation.

The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines

Correctly staging lung cancer is extremely important because the treatment options and the prognosis differ significantly by stage. Several noninvasive imaging studies are available to aid in identifying disease both within and outside of the chest. Chest CT scanning is useful in providing anatomic detail that better identifies the location of the tumor, its proximity to local structures, and whether or not lymph nodes in the mediastinum are enlarged. Unfortunately, the accuracy of chest CT scanning in differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes in the mediastinum is unacceptably low. Whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scanning provides functional information on tissue activity and has much better sensitivity and specificity than chest CT scanning for staging lung cancer in the mediastinum. In addition, metastatic disease can be detected by PET scan. Still, positive findings of PET scans can occur from nonmalignant etiologies (eg, infections), so that tissue sampling to confirm the suspected malignancy must be performed. The clinical evaluation tool, which is composed of a thorough history and physical examination, remains the best predictor of metastatic disease. If the findings from the clinical evaluation are negative, then imaging studies such as a CT scan of the head, a bone scan, or an abdominal CT scan are unnecessary, and the search for metastatic disease is complete. If signs, symptoms, or findings from the physical examination suggest the presence of malignancy, then sequential imaging, starting with the most appropriate study based on the clues obtained by the clinical evaluation, should be performed. Abnormalities detected by all of the aforementioned imaging studies are not always cancer. Unless overwhelming evidence of metastatic disease is present on an imaging study, in situations in which it will make a difference in treatment, all abnormal scan findings require tissue confirmation of malignancy so that patients are not precluded from having potentially curative surgery.

Extrathoracic staging of non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: relationship of the clinical evaluation to organ scans

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of systemic evaluation of extrathoracic extension of non-small cell lung cancer and to assess the value of the clinical evaluation in detecting extrathoracic metastases.

METHODOLOGY

The study included 90 patients [87 men, three women; mean age 57.5 years (range 28-76)] with potentially resectable non-small cell carcinoma. Fifty-two were squamous cell carcinomas and 38 were adenocarcinomas. Organ-specific and non-organ-specific clinical findings suggesting metastases were analysed and computed tomographic scans of the brain and abdomen and whole-body bone scanning were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Extrathoracic metastases were detected in 23 (25.5%) of 90 patients. The metastases were located in the following areas: brain (n = 12, 13.3%); bone (n = 9, 10%); liver (n = 5, 5.6%); and adrenal gland (n = 5, 5.5%). Histological analysis revealed metastases in 21.1% (11/52) of the squamous cell carcinomas and 31.6% (12/38) of the adenocarcinomas (P > 0.05). Eleven (47.8%) of the 23 patients with extrathoracic metastases had no organ-specific clinical findings suggesting metastases. Eight patients with squamous cell carcinomas were intrathoracic T1N0 stage and in two (25%) of these patients extrathoracic metastases were detected. These patients had no organ-specific or non-organ-specific clinical factors suggesting metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of extrathoracic extension should be routinely performed in all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. This approach will prevent many unnecessary thoracotomies.

Clinical Utility of PET-FDG Imaging in Differentiation of Benign from Malignant Adrenal Masses in Lung Cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracy of PET-FDG imaging in detecting metastatic disease involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer. We wanted to compare efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging to computed tomography (CT) scanning in differentiating benign from malignant involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer. Thirty patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer and abnormal findings on PET and/or CT scanning were studied for presence of adrenal abnormality suggestive of metastatic disease involvement (n = 26) or benign adrenal enlargement (n = 4). The results of PET and CT scanning were compared to histological findings and/or clinical follow-up for at least 1 year for presence or absence of adrenal metastases. PET-FDG imaging correctly detected the presence of metastatic involvement in 17 of 18 patients and excluded metastatic involvement in 11 of 12 patients for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 94.4%, 91.6%, and 93.3%, respectively. CT scanning showed enlarged adrenals without metastases in 8 of 30 patients and normal-sized adrenals in the presence of metastases in 5 of 30 patients. There was a false-positive PET finding in 1 patient and a false-negative PET finding in another patient. PET-FDG imaging is a highly sensitive, specific, and accurate test to differentiate benign from malignant involvement of adrenal glands in patients with lung cancer and often ambiguous findings on CT scanning.

Clinical and surgical staging of non-small cell lung cancer

The necessity for a compulsive attitude toward preoperative assessment of lung cancer is to be emphasized, since rational treatment and prognosis depend largely on the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. In the preoperative setting, the techniques used should be sequential, logical, and help to identify patients suitable for treatment with curative intent. With regard to the primary tumor (T status), the accuracy of CT or MRI to predict the need for extended resections is limited. Similarly, all noninvasive methods to determine the nodal status (N) are valuable, but mediastinoscopy has a greater sensitivity and specificity than either CT or MRI. The role of routine organ screening for the detection of distant occult metastasis in the asymptomatic patient is still controversial. Ultimately, the prognosis of the resected patient with lung cancer is based on complete intraoperative staging, which can be done by either systematic node sampling or complete lymphadenectomy. At present, neither of these techniques has been shown to improve the quality of staging or survival.

Transcutaneous abdominal ultrasonography in the staging of lung cancer

BACKGROUND

There is limited information available regarding the relationship between clinical indicators of widespread disease in patients with lung cancer and the findings of transcutaneous ultrasonography.

METHODS

A retrospective survey was made of 279 consecutive patients with lung cancer. By reviewing the patients' records the clinical findings were divided into symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests indicative of metastatic disease. All patients had been examined by abdominal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The patients included 19% with small cell carcinoma. The frequency of abdominal metastases by ultrasonography in those with small cell carcinoma was 40%, in the other patients it was 8%. Regardless of histological group, all the 40 patients with abdominal metastases by ultrasonography had at least one clinical category indicative of widespread disease and 38 (95%) had two or all three clinical categories positive. Fifty nine patients had no clinical indicators of metastases and none of these had abdominal metastases by ultrasonography.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that abdominal metastases are found in lung cancer patients with clinical findings indicative of widespread disease. No abdominal metastases were found in patients with a negative clinical evaluation. The results indicate that transcutaneous ultrasonography of the abdomen is not necessary in the initial staging if the clinical evaluation is unremarkable.

Incidentalomas. A disease of modern technology

The optimal strategy for hormonal screening of a patient with any incidentally discovered adrenal or pituitary mass is unknown. Our review of the endocrinologic literature supports the view that such patients are at slightly increased risk for morbidity and mortality. There is a benefit of early diagnosis for at least for some of the disorders, suggesting the importance of case finding. The data in Tables 1 and 4 illustrate that clinically diagnosed hormone-secreting adrenal and pituitary tumors are far less common than incidentalomas. From a clinical perspective, our ability to determine accurately those at increased risk among the vast majority who are not at increased risk is poor. Given the limitations of diagnostic tests, effective hormonal screening requires a sufficiently high pretest probability to limit the number of false-positive results. This condition is met to varying degrees in the patient with an adrenal mass or small incidentally discovered pituitary mass but no signs or symptoms of hormone excess. Even the more common lesions such as pheochromocytoma and prolactinoma are relatively rare. Subjecting patients to unnecessary testing and treatment carries its own set of risks. Initial costs aside, testing may result in further expense and harm as false-positive results are pursued, producing the cascade effect described by Mold and Stein as a "chain of events (which) tends to proceed with increasing momentum, so that the further it progresses the more difficult it is to stop." The extensive evaluations performed in some patients with incidentally discovered masses may reflect the unwillingness of many physicians to accept uncertainty, even in the case of extremely unlikely diagnoses. This unwillingness may be driven, in part, by fear of potential malpractice liability, the failure to appreciate the influence of prevalence data on the interpretation of diagnostic testing, or other factors. Indeed, the major justification for further evaluation of these patients is not so much to avoid morbidity and mortality for rate patients who truly are at increased risk but rather to reassure those in whom further testing is negative (and to reassure ourselves). Physicians must take care not to create inappropriate anxiety in patients by overemphasizing the importance of an incidental finding unless it is associated with a realistic clinical risk. Our recommendations utilize currently available information to minimize the untoward effects of the cascade. As evidence accumulates, recommendations may need to be revised. The benefit of diagnosis of one of these adrenal or pituitary disorders must be considered in the context of the patient's overall condition. Studies are needed to analyze the utility in clinical practice of hormonal screening for these common radiologic findings. We need to use these studies to identify the critical gaps in our knowledge and to adopt the epidemiologic methods of evaluation of evidence that have been applied to preventive measures. We must be careful to recognize lead-time bias in which survival can seem to be lengthened when screening simply advances the time of diagnosis, lengthening the period of time between diagnosis and death without any true prolongation of life. Length bias refers to the tendency of screening to detect a disproportionate number of cases of slowly progressive disease and to miss aggressive cases that, by virtue of rapid progression, are present in the population only briefly. Endocrinologists must avoid the pitfalls of overestimation of disease prevalence and of the benefits of therapy resulting from advances in diagnostic imaging. Clinical judgment based on the best available evidence should be complemented and not replaced by laboratory data.

Analysis of published studies on the detection of extrathoracic metastases in patients presumed to have operable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to determine the proportion of patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer that could be spared thoracotomy by a systematic search for extrathoracic metastases.

METHODS

An English language literature search was carried out using MEDLINE (1966-91) and bibliographic reviews of textbooks, review articles, and key articles. Studies were included in which at least 90% of the patients had histologically proven non-small cell cancer of the lung, were presumed otherwise operable, and for which the results of computed tomography of the head or abdomen, ultrasonography of the abdomen, or radionuclide imaging (scan) of bone or liver were available. Study quality and specific descriptive information concerning population, intervention, and outcome measurements were assessed.

RESULTS

Of approximately 1500 citations which were screened, 100 were reviewed in detail and data abstracted from 16. The number of patients (total number, followed in square brackets by number of asymptomatic patients) shown to be inoperable directly as a result of the investigation and thus spared unnecessary thoracotomy was: computed tomography of the head: 26/785 (3.3%), 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1% to 4.4% [14/353 (4.0%), 95% CI 2% to 6%], computed tomography of the adrenal glands: 30/632 (4.7%), 95% CI 3.0% to 6.4% [number asymptomatic indeterminate], bone scan: 45/480 (9.3%), 95% CI 6.7% to 12% [9/301 (3.0%), 95% CI 1.1% to 4.9%], liver imaging: 12/529 (2.3%), 95% CI 0.9% to 3.3% [4/268 (1.5%), 95% CI 0.1% to 3%].

CONCLUSIONS

A study with a large sample size and preferably incorporating thoracic computed tomography is required to narrow the confidence intervals around each test. All tests may play an important part in the preoperative evaluation of patients with non-small cell carcinoma of the lung who are presumed to be operable, including asymptomatic patients. Limitations of present data preclude definitive recommendations for asymptomatic patients.

Staging for M disease

The presence of distant metastatic disease (M disease) in non-small-cell cancer patients is associated with a poor prognosis, and surgical resection at the primary site is contraindicated. Careful preoperative evaluation to identify the subset of patients presenting with M disease is essential in order to avoid unnecessary surgery. Current indications for the use of diagnostic techniques and the methods utilized to detect metastatic disease at the commonest sites encountered in patients with non-small-cell carcinoma, including the pleura, central nervous system, liver, adrenal glands, and skeletal system, are discussed.

The relationship of clinical findings to CT scan evidence of adrenal gland metastases in the staging of bronchogenic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether, during the staging of newly diagnosed bronchogenic carcinoma, clinical indicators predict the presence or absence of adrenal metastases detected by computerized tomographic (CT) scans.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of charts and roentgenograms.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Two hundred five consecutive patients diagnosed with bronchogenic carcinoma, of whom 173 had sufficient data available for analysis.

MEASUREMENTS

Charts were reviewed for abnormalities in three clinical categories (signs, symptoms, and routine laboratory tests) and the presence of extrapulmonary tumor spread. The CT scans were reviewed for evidence of adrenal involvement by radiologists blinded to clinical findings.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty patients had abnormal adrenal glands on CT scan. In 26 the abnormality was believed to represent adrenal metastasis, whereas in four the CT findings were consistent with adrenal adenomas. The frequency of adrenal metastases varied with the number of positive, clinical findings (chi 2 = 105.4; p < 0.001). All 26 patients with adrenal metastases had at least one clinical abnormality, and 21 (81 percent had abnormalities in either two or all three clinical categories. In 40 patients without any clinical indicators of widespread disease, none had CT evidence of adrenal metastases. The presence of adrenal metastases also varied with the extent of coexistent disease (chi 2 = 111.82; p < 0.001). Eighty-one percent (21) of the patients with and 18 percent of those without adrenal metastases had both intrathoracic and extrathoracic involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that adrenal metastases are found in patients with a large tumor burden who have clinical indicators of widespread disease. We found no evidence of adrenal metastases by CT in any patient with a normal clinical evaluation. We conclude that CT scans through the adrenal glands are unnecessary when staging newly diagnosed bronchogenic carcinoma if the findings from the initial clinical evaluation are normal.

Proliferative activity of early gastric cancer measured by in vitro and in vivo bromodeoxyuridine labeling

Forty seven patients with early gastric cancer received a 30-minute intravenous injection of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), 1000 mg each 1 hour before laparotomy, to label tumor cells in the S phase. In 13 of 47 patients, specimens obtained by endoscopic biopsy were cultured in vitro at 37 degrees C for 1 hour under three times the atmospheric pressure in a vial with 400 microM BrdU. Labeled cells were detected in the resected specimen and the cultured specimen by immunohistochemical staining procedure. The BrdU labeling index (LI, defined as the percentage of labeled cells in relation to the 1000 tumor cells) was calculated for each specimen. All patients without lymph node metastasis had an in vivo BrdU LI of less than 12%. In contrast, 31% of patients with early gastric cancer with an in vivo BrdU LI greater than 12% had lymph node metastasis. There was a correlation between the in vivo and the in vitro LI. Therefore, the in vitro BrdU LI of specimens obtained by endoscopic biopsy may be a useful indicator of lymph node status in patients with individual early gastric cancers before operations. If the in vitro BrdU LI is less than 12% lymph node dissection may not be necessary.

Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors

The value of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing localized involvement of liver, pancreas, adrenals, and lymph nodes was evaluated in 117 patients with suspected or known malignant tumors by correlation with autopsy findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for localized liver disease was calculated to be 80% (84%), 96% (97%), and 90% (92%); for pancreatic tumors: 81% (86%), 98% (100%), and 95% (97%); for adrenal tumors: 65% (92%), 100% (100%), and 92% (98%); and for lymph node enlargement 75 (88%), 97% (98%), and 87% (94%), respectively. Results of routine evaluation could be improved, especially in the adrenal region, when scans were reevaluated by highly experienced examiners (results given in parenthesis). Computed tomography is a highly valuable diagnostic tool in the primary diagnosis and in the follow-up of tumor patients. The high costs are offset by a reduction in invasive procedures and a shortened hospital stay.