Combined modality treatment of operated astrocytomas grade 3 and 4. A prospective and randomized study of misonidazole and radiotherapy with two different radiation schedules and subsequent CCNU chemotherapy. Stage II of a prospective multicenter trial of the Scandinavian Glioblastoma Study Group

Current Landscape and Future Prospects of Radiation Sensitizers for Malignant Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy (RT) is the cornerstone of management of malignant brain tumors, but its efficacy is limited in hypoxic tumors. Although numerous radiosensitizer compounds have been developed to enhance the effect of RT, progress has been stagnant. Through this systematic review, we provide an overview of radiosensitizers developed for malignant brain tumors, summarize their safety and efficacy, and evaluate areas for possible improvement.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched using terminology pertaining to radiosensitizers for brain tumor RT. Articles reporting clinical evidence of nonantineoplastic radiosensitizers with RT for malignant central nervous system tumors were included. Data of interest were presumed mechanism of action, median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Twenty-two unique radiosensitizers were identified. Only 2/22 agents (fluosol with oxygen, and efaproxiral) showed improvement in OS in patients with glioblastoma and brain metastasis, respectively. A larger study was not able to confirm the latter. Improved PFS was reported with use of metronidazole, sodium glycididazole, and chloroquine. There was a wide range of toxicities, which prompted change of schedule or complete discontinuation of 9 agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress in radiosensitizers for malignant CNS tumors has been limited. Only 2 radiosensitizers have shown limited improvement in survival. Alternative strategies such as synthetic drug design, based on a mechanism of action that is independent of crossing the blood-brain barrier, may be necessary. Use of drug development strategies using new technologies to overcome past challenges is necessary.

External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 8, 2016. High grade glioma (HGG) is a rapidly growing brain tumour in the supporting cells of the nervous system, with several subtypes such as glioblastoma (grade IV astrocytoma), anaplastic (grade III) astrocytoma and anaplastic (grade III) oligodendroglioma. Studies have investigated the best strategy to give radiation to people with HGG. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy involves giving a daily radiation dose (called a fraction) of 180 cGy to 200 cGy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy uses higher daily doses, which reduces the overall number of fractions and treatment time. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy which uses a lower daily dose with a greater number of fractions and multiple fractions per day to deliver a total dose at least equivalent to external beam daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in the same time frame. The aim is to reduce the potential for late toxicity. Accelerated radiotherapy (dose escalation) refers to the delivery of multiple fractions per day using daily doses of radiation consistent with external beam daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy doses. The aim is to reduce the overall treatment time; typically, two or three fractions per day may be delivered with a six to eight hour gap between fractions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of postoperative external beam radiation dose escalation in adults with HGG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid and Embase Ovid to August 2019 for relevant randomised phase III trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included adults with a pathological diagnosis of HGG randomised to the following external beam radiation regimens: daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy; hypofractionated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy; hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy or accelerated radiotherapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were overall survival and adverse effects. The secondary outcomes were progression free survival and quality of life. We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Since the last version of this review, we identified no new relevant trials for inclusion. We included 11 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 2062 participants and 1537 in the relevant arms for this review. There was an overall survival benefit for people with HGG receiving postoperative radiotherapy compared to the participants receiving postoperative supportive care. For the four pooled RCTs (397 participants), the overall hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 2.01 favouring postoperative radiotherapy (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 2.55; P < 0.00001; moderate-certainty evidence). Although these trials may not have completely reported adverse effects, they did not note any significant toxicity attributable to radiation. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to lack of data. Overall survival was similar between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in five trials (943 participants), where the HR was 0.95 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.17; P = 0.63; very low-certainty evidence. The trials reported that hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy were well tolerated with mild acute adverse effects. These trials only reported one participant in the hypofractionated arm developing symptomatic radiation necrosis that required surgery. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to the lack of data. Overall survival was similar between hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy in the subset of two trials (293 participants) which included participants aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. For this category, the HR was 1.16 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.46; P = 0.21; high-certainty evidence). There were two trials which compared hyperfractionated radiotherapy versus conventional radiation and one trial which compared accelerated radiotherapy versus conventional radiation. However, the results could not be pooled. The conventionally fractionated radiotherapy regimens were 4500 cGy to 6000 cGy given in 180 cGy to 200 cGy daily fractions, over five to six weeks. All trials generally included participants with World Health Organization (WHO) performance status from 0 to 2 and Karnofsky performance status of 50 and higher. The risk of selection bias was generally low among these RCTs. The number of participants lost to follow-up for the outcome of overall survival was low. Attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias for the outcome of overall survival was low. There was unclear attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias relating to the outcomes of adverse effects, progression free survival and quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative conventional daily radiotherapy probably improves survival for adults with good performance status and HGG compared to no postoperative radiotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has similar efficacy for survival compared to conventional radiotherapy, particularly for individuals aged 60 years and older with glioblastoma. There are insufficient data regarding hyperfractionation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy) and for accelerated radiation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy). There are HGG subsets who have poor prognosis even with treatment (e.g. glioblastoma histology, older age and poor performance status). These HGG individuals with poor prognosis have generally been excluded from randomised trials based on poor performance status. No randomised trial has compared comfort measures or best supportive care with an active intervention using radiotherapy or chemotherapy in these people with poor prognosis. Since the last version of this review, we found no new relevant studies. The search identified three new trials, but all were excluded as none had a conventionally fractionated radiotherapy arm.

Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A glioblastoma is a fatal type of brain tumour for which the standard of care is maximum surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy, when possible. Age is an important consideration in this disease, as older age is associated with shorter survival and a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the most effective and best-tolerated approaches for the treatment of elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with these approaches.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched electronic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase to 3 April 2019, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to database closure. We handsearched clinical trial registries and selected neuro-oncology society conference proceedings from the past five years.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials (RCTs) of treatments for glioblastoma in elderly people. We defined 'elderly' as 70+ years but included studies defining 'elderly' as over 65+ years if so reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods for study selection and data extraction. Where sufficient data were available, treatment options were compared in a network meta-analysis (NMA) using Stata software (version 15.1). For outcomes with insufficient data for NMA, pairwise meta-analysis were conducted in RevMan. The GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 1818 participants. Six were conducted exclusively among elderly people (either defined as 65 years or older or 70 years or older) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the other six reported data for an elderly subgroup among a broader age range of participants. Most participants were capable of self-care. Study quality was commonly undermined by lack of outcome assessor blinding and attrition. NMA was only possible for overall survival; other analyses were pair-wise meta-analyses or narrative syntheses. Seven trials contributed to the NMA for overall survival, with interventions including supportive care only (one trial arm); hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT40; four trial arms); standard radiotherapy (RT60; five trial arms); temozolomide (TMZ; three trial arms); chemoradiotherapy (CRT; three trial arms); bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy (BEV_CRT; one trial arm); and bevacizumab with radiotherapy (BEV_RT). Compared with supportive care only, NMA evidence suggested that all treatments apart from BEV_RT prolonged survival to some extent. Overall survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with RT40 (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.80) and low-certainty evidence suggests that CRT may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ (TMZ versus CRT: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.98). Low-certainty evidence also suggests that adding BEV to CRT may make little or no difference (BEV_CRT versus CRT: HR 0.83, 95% CrI 0.48 to 1.44). We could not compare the survival effects of CRT with different radiotherapy fractionation schedules (60 Gy/30 fractions and 40 Gy/15 fractions) due to a lack of data. When treatments were ranked according to their effects on OS, CRT ranked higher than TMZ, RT and supportive care only, with the latter ranked last. BEV plus RT was the only treatment for which there was no clear benefit in OS over supportive care only.   One trial comparing tumour treating fields (TTF) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (TTF_AC) with adjuvant chemotherapy alone could not be included in the NMA as participants were randomised after receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy, not before. Findings from the trial suggest that the intervention probably improves overall survival in this selected patient population. We were unable to perform NMA for other outcomes due to insufficient data. Pairwise analyses were conducted for the following. Quality of life Moderate-certainty narrative evidence suggests that overall, there may be little difference in QoL between TMZ and RT, except for discomfort from communication deficits, which are probably more common with RT (1 study, 306 participants, P = 0.002). Data on QoL for other comparisons were sparse, partly due to high dropout rates, and the certainty of the evidence tended to be low or very low. Progression-free survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.61); moderate-certainty evidence suggests that RT60 probably increases time to disease progression compared with supportive care only (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.46), and that BEV_RT probably increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 alone (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). Evidence for other treatment comparisons was of low- or very low-certainty. Severe adverse events Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that TMZ probably increases the risk of grade 3+ thromboembolic events compared with RT60 (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.94; participants = 373; studies = 1) and also the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Moderate-certainty evidence also suggests that CRT probably increases the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia compared with hypofractionated RT alone. Adding BEV to CRT probably increases the risk of thromboembolism (RR 16.63, 95% CI 1.00 to 275.42; moderate-certainty evidence). Economic evidence There is a paucity of economic evidence regarding the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Only one economic evaluation on two short course radiotherapy regimen (25 Gy versus 40 Gy) was identified and its findings were considered unreliable.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For elderly people with glioblastoma who are self-caring, evidence suggests that CRT prolongs survival compared with RT and may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ alone. For those undergoing RT or TMZ therapy, there is probably little difference in QoL overall. Systemic anti-cancer treatments TMZ and BEV carry a higher risk of severe haematological and thromboembolic events and CRT is probably associated with a higher risk of these events. Current evidence provides little justification for using BEV in elderly patients outside a clinical trial setting. Whilst the novel TTF device appears promising, evidence on QoL and tolerability is needed in an elderly population. QoL and economic assessments of CRT versus TMZ and RT are needed. More high-quality economic evaluations are needed, in which a broader scope of costs (both direct and indirect) and outcomes should be included.

Clinical Results of Unconventional Fractionation Radiotherapy in Central Nervous System Tumors

Malignant brain tumors (primary and metastatic) are apparently resistant to most therapeutic efforts. Several randomized trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy of radiation therapy. Attempts at improving the results of external beam radiotherapy include altered fractionation, radiation sensitizers and concomitant chemotherapy. In low-grade gliomas, all clinical studies with radiotherapy have employed conventional dose fractionation regimens. In high-grade gliomas, hypofractionation schedules represent effective palliative regimens in poor prognosis subsets of patients; short-term survival in these patients has not allowed to evaluate late toxicity. In tumors arising within the central nervous system, hyperfractionated irradiation exploits the differences in repair capacity between tumour and late responding normal tissues. It may allow for higher total dose and may result in increased tumor cell kill. Accelerated radiotherapy may reduce the repopulation of tumor cells between fractions. It may potentially improve tumor control for a given dose level, provided that there is no increase in late normal tissue injury. In supratentorial malignant gliomas, superiority of accelerated hyperfractionated over conventionally fractionated schedules was observed in a randomized trial; however, the gain in survival was less than 6 months. At present no other randomized trial supports the preferential choice for altered fractionation irradiation. Also in pediatric brainstem tumors there are no data to confirm the routine use of hyperfractionated irradiation, and significant late sequelae have been reported in the few long-term survivors. Shorter treatment courses with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy may represent a useful alternative to conventional irradiation for the palliation of brain metastases. Different considerations have been proposed to explain this gap between theory and clinical data. Patients included in dose/effect studies are not stratified by prognostic factors and other treatment-related parameters. This observation precludes any definite conclusion about the relative role of conventional and of altered fractionation. New approaches are currently in progress. More prolonged radiation treatments, up to higher total doses, could delay time to tumor progression and improve survival in good prognosis subsets of patients; altered fractionation may be an effective therapeutic tool to achieve this goal.

Incidence and Survival of Brain Tumors: A Population-Based Study

Since 1976 the Lombardy Cancer Registry (RTL) has recorded all malignant tumors and the benign tumors of the nervous system, bladder and liver occurring in the Varese province. The aims of this report are: to describe age-specific incidence rates of the different oncotypes of primary nervous system tumors (PNSTs) and to analyze the duration of survival of the patients according to the histotype of the neoplasm. From 1976 to 1981, the RTL recorded 498 PNST: 213 tumors of glial origin, 132 tumors of mesodermal tissues, 15 tumors of multipotential cell origin, 37 tumors of nerve roots, 8 of vascular origin, and 54 PNST in which the histotype was not specified. For tumors of glial origin, the 60–69 year age class showed the highest incidence rate: 16 per 100,000/year. The incidence rate of tumors of mesodermal tissues reached the maximum value of 7.9 per 100,000/year in the age group of 75 years and over. Tumors of multipotential cell origin had a maximum incidence of 2.2 in the 60–69 year age class. The probability of survival at 5 years after diagnosis was computed by the method of Kaplan and Meier (15), and the log rank procedure was used to test statistical differences among survivors. Tumors of glial origin, excluding ependymomas and papillomas of choroid plexus, had a 5-year survival probability of 14%. Age (categorized in ≤50 and > 50 years) and histologic grade (grades I+II and grades III+IV) were analyzed as prognostic factors for tumors of glial origin: a younger age was the most predictive prognostic factor in grade I+II tumors (probability of survival = 53% in the group ≤50 years vs 0 in the group > 50 years; p < 0.005). In the less differentiated tumors there were no differences between the two age groups. Patients with tumors of mesodermal tissues had a 5-year probability of survival of 83%. Subjects younger than 50 years had a probability of survival of 95%, whereas older patients had a probability of 79%. For the other oncotypes, the 5-year survival probability was: 50% for tumors of multipotential cell origin, 63% for ependymomas and papillomas of the choroid plexus, 64% for tumors of vascular derivation, and 21% for PNST with not specified histotype.

External beam radiation dose escalation for high grade glioma

BACKGROUND

The incidence of high grade glioma (HGG) is approximately 5 per 100,000 person-years in Europe and North America.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of postoperative external beam radiation dose escalation in adults with HGG.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1977 to October 2015) and Embase (1980 to end October 2015) for relevant randomised phase III trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included adults with a pathological diagnosis of HGG randomised to the following external beam radiation regimens.1. Daily conventionally fractionated radiation therapy versus no radiation therapy.2. Hypofractionated radiation therapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiation therapy.3. Hyperfractionated radiation therapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiation therapy.4. Accelerated radiation therapy versus daily conventionally fractionated radiation therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were overall survival and adverse effects. The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival and quality of life. We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used the GRADE approach, as outlined by Cochrane, to interpret the overall quality of the evidence from included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 2062 participants and 1537 in the relevant arms for this review. There was an overall survival benefit for HGG participants receiving postoperative radiotherapy compared to the participants receiving postoperative supportive care. For the four pooled RCTs (397 participants), the overall hazard ratio (HR) for survival was 2.01 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58 to 2.55, P < 0.00001), moderate GRADE quality evidence favouring postoperative radiotherapy. Although these trials may not have completely reported adverse effects, they did not note any significant toxicity attributable to radiation. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to lack of data.Overall survival was similar between hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in five trials (943 participants), where the HR was 0.95 (95% CI 0.78 to 1.17, P = 0.63), very low GRADE quality evidence. The trials reported that hypofractionated and conventional radiotherapy were well tolerated with mild acute adverse effects. These trials only reported one patient in the hypofractionated arm developing symptomatic radiation necrosis that required surgery. Progression free survival and quality of life could not be pooled due to the lack of data.Overall survival was also similar between hypofractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in the subset of two trials (293 participants) which included 60 years and older participants with glioblastoma. For this category, the HR was 1.16 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.46, P = 0.21), high GRADE quality evidence.There were two trials which compared hyperfractionated radiation therapy versus conventional radiation and one trial which compared accelerated radiation therapy versus conventional radiation. However, the results could not be pooled.The conventionally fractionated radiation therapy regimens were 4500 to 6000 cGy given in 180 to 200 cGy daily fractions, over 5 to 6 weeks.All these trials generally included participants with World Health Organization (WHO) performance status from 0 to 2 and Karnofsky performance status of 50 and higher.The risk of selection bias was generally low among these randomized trials. The number of participants lost to follow-up for the outcome of overall survival was low. Attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias for the outcome of overall survival was low. There was unclear attrition, performance, detection and reporting bias relating to the outcomes of adverse effects, progression free survival and quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative conventional daily radiotherapy improves survival for adults with good performance status and HGG as compared to no postoperative radiotherapy.Hypofractionated radiation therapy has similar efficacy for survival as compared to conventional radiotherapy, particularly for individuals aged 60 and older with glioblastoma.There is insufficient data regarding hyperfractionation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy) and for accelerated radiation versus conventionally fractionated radiation (without chemotherapy).There are HGG subsets who have poor prognosis even with treatment (e.g. glioblastoma histology, older age and poor performance status). These poor prognosis HGG individuals have generally been excluded from the randomised trials based on poor performance status. No randomised trial has compared comfort measures or best supportive care with an active intervention using radiotherapy or chemotherapy in these poor prognosis patients.

Therapeutic interactions of autophagy with radiation and temozolomide in glioblastoma: evidence and issues to resolve

Glioblastoma is a unique model of non-metastasising disease that kills the vast majority of patients through local growth, despite surgery and local irradiation. Glioblastoma cells are resistant to apoptotic stimuli, and their death occurs through autophagy. This review aims to critically present our knowledge regarding the autophagic response of glioblastoma cells to radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) and to delineate eventual research directions to follow, in the quest of improving the curability of this incurable, as yet, disease. Radiation and TMZ interfere with the autophagic machinery, but whether cell response is driven to autophagy flux acceleration or blockage is disputable and may depend on both cell individuality and radiotherapy fractionation or TMZ schedules. Potent agents that block autophagy at an early phase of initiation or at a late phase of autolysosomal fusion are available aside to agents that induce functional autophagy, or even demethylating agents that may unblock the function of autophagy-initiating genes in a subset of tumours. All these create a maze, which if properly investigated can open new insights for the application of novel radio- and chemosensitising policies, exploiting the autophagic pathways that glioblastomas use to escape death.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for adults with malignant glioma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review examines the role of chemotherapy following surgery and external beam radiotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to August 2006 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses. Proceedings from the 1997 to 2006 annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were also searched.

RESULTS

Two RCTs reported a survival advantage in favour of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma. Twenty-six RCTs and two meta-analyses detected either no advantage or a small survival advantage in favour of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant temozolomide during radiotherapy and post-radiation adjuvant temozolomide is recommended for all patients ages 18-70 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme who are fit for radical therapy (ECOG 0-1). Temozolomide may be considered in other situations (i.e., ECOG 2, biopsy only, age > 70, intermediate grade glioma), but there is no high-level evidence to support this decision. Moreover, there are few data on long-term toxicities or quality of life with temozolomide. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be an option for younger patients with anaplastic (grade 3) astrocytoma and patients with pure or mixed oligodendroglioma. However, there is no evidence of a survival advantage from adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients, and treatment-related adverse effects and their impact upon quality of life are poorly studied. The combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) is not recommended for patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma.

Radiothérapie des glioblastomes : de la radiobiologie à la chimiothérapie concomitante

The prognosis of glioblastoma remains extremely poor. Clinical research has been very active for thirty years, and has explored all the concepts developed in the laboratories of radiobiology. Radiosensitisation of hypoxic tumours, hyperfractioned radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery or brachytherapy boost, and intensity modulated radiation therapy failed to improve the results of the treatment of these patients. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy has just obtained a new success in the treatment of glioblastoma. The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy resulted in a statistically significant survival benefit with minimal acute additional toxicity. The challenge remains to improve clinical outcomes further, and some new research pathways are open.

Survival improvement in patients with glioblastoma multiforme during the last 20 years in a single tertiary-care center

METHODOLOGY

The survival of 357 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in three treatment groups reflecting different time-periods of diagnosis (A: 1982-1984; B: 1994/1995; C: 1996-1998) was analysed to assess the impact and the potential improvement of changing treatment strategies in our tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Group A (n = 100) included all consecutive patients diagnosed from 1982 to 1984 and served as the historical control. Group B (n = 93) included all consecutive patients diagnosed in 1994/1995 and group C (n = 164) those diagnosed from 1996 to 1998. Survival in the three treatment groups (A vs. B vs. C) was analysed according to treatment given after neurosurgical intervention (i.e. no specific therapy versus radiotherapy versus combined radio-/chemotherapy), and according to first-line chemotherapy, age (< 40, 40-60, > 60), sex, and tumor location (hemispheric versus bilateral or multifocal tumors, and tumors involving eloquent brain areas). Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier's non-parametric method. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients in groups A and B received radio- and/or chemotherapy to a varying extent (radiotherapy: group A: 22%, group B: 62%; chemotherapy: group A: 6%, group B: 33%). Chemotherapy was administered after termination of radiotherapy in both groups. In group C, 96% of patients received combined radio-/chemotherapy which was administered concomitantly and started within three weeks after surgery. Median survival was 5.2 months in group A, 5.1 months in group B and 14.5 months in C (p < 0.0001). Nine patients in group A (9%), 9 in group B (10%) and 40 in group C (25%) survived more than 18 months (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival improvement in group C might be attributable to the early start of combined radio-/chemotherapy. Therapy was administered on a complete outpatient basis, enabled by a dedicated interdisciplinary neuro-oncologic team caring for group C. Toxicity was mild and patients' acceptance excellent.

Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review

PURPOSE

A systematic review was conducted to develop guidelines for radiotherapy in adult patients with newly diagnosed malignant glioma.

METHODS

MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Library, and relevant conference proceedings were searched to identify randomized trials and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Pooling of six randomized trials detected a significant survival benefit favouring post-operative radiotherapy compared with no radiotherapy (risk ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.88, P<0.00001). Two randomized trials demonstrated no significant difference in survival rates for whole brain radiation versus more local fields that encompass the enhancing primary plus a 2 cm margin. A randomized trial detected a small improvement in survival with 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 45 Gy in 20 fractions. Radiation dose intensification and radiation sensitizer approaches have not demonstrated superior survival rates compared with conventionally fractionated doses of 50-60 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative external beam radiotherapy is recommended as standard therapy for patients with malignant glioma. The high-dose volume should incorporate the enhancing tumour plus a limited margin (e.g. 2 cm) for the planning target volume, and the total dose delivered should be in the range of 50-60 Gy in fraction sizes of 1.8-2.0 Gy. Radiation dose intensification and radiation sensitizer approaches are not recommended as standard care. For patients older than age 70, preliminary data suggest that the same survival benefit can be achieved with less morbidity using a shorter course of radiotherapy. Supportive care alone is a reasonable therapeutic option in patients older than age 70 with a poor performance status.

Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials

BACKGROUND

Trials on the effect of systemic chemotherapy on survival and recurrence in adults with high-grade glioma have had inconclusive results. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment on survival and recurrence.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from all available randomised trials that compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy. Data for 3004 patients from 12 randomised controlled trials were included (11 published and one unpublished).

FINDINGS

Overall, the results showed significant prolongation of survival associated with chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91, p<0.0001) or a 15% relative decrease in the risk of death. This effect is equivalent to an absolute increase in 1-year survival of 6% (95% CI 3-9) from 40% to 46% and a 2-month increase in median survival time (1-3). There was no evidence that the effect of chemotherapy differed in any group of patients defined by age, sex, histology, performance status, or extent of resection.

INTERPRETATION

This small but clear improvement in survival from chemotherapy encourages further study of drug treatment of these tumours.

Chemotherapy for high-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

Trials on the effect of systemic chemotherapy on survival and recurrence in adults with high-grade glioma have had inconclusive results. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of such treatment on survival and recurrence.

OBJECTIVES

To compare radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with radiotherapy alone in completely resected adults with high-grade glioma. To investigate whether or not pre-defined patient subgroups benefit more or less from chemotherapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE and CancerLit searches were supplemented with information from trial registers and by hand searching relevant meeting proceedings and by discussion with relevant trialists and organisations. These searches were carried out in June 1997, June 1999 and December 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Trials comparing radiotherapy versus radiotherapy + chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion provided that they randomized adult patients using a method which precluded prior knowledge of treatment assignment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A quantitative meta-analysis using updated information from individual patients from all available randomized trials was carried out. Data from all patients randomized in all eligible trials were sought directly from those responsible. Updated information on survival and date of follow-up were obtained, as were details of treatment allocation, date of randomization, age, sex, histological cell type, stage and performance status. To avoid potential bias, information was requested for all randomized patients including those who had been excluded from the investigators' original analyses. All analyses were done on an intention to treat basis on the endpoint of survival. For trials using cisplatin-based regimens, subgroup analyses by age, sex, histological cell type, tumour stage and performance status were also done.

MAIN RESULTS

Data from 12 randomized trials and 3004 patients were included. The results show a significant prolongation of survival associated with chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91, p=0.00004) or 15% relative decrease in the risk of death. This is equivalent to an absolute increase in one year survival rate of 6% (95% confidence interval 3% to 9%) from 40% to 46% and a two-month increase in median survival time (95% confidence interval one month to three months). There was no evidence that the effect of chemotherapy was different in any group of patients defined by age, sex, histology, performance status or extent of resection.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This small but clear improvement in survival from chemotherapy encourages further study of drug treatment of these tumours

Randomized trial of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade astrocytoma: a Medical Research Council trial

PURPOSE

Meta-analyses of the published literature suggest a survival benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade astrocytoma, which individual small trials have been unable to demonstrate reliably. The Medical Research Council Brain Tumour Working Party initiated the largest randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for glioma in an attempt to provide a definitive answer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After surgery, patients aged < or = 70 years, with World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 astrocytoma, were randomized to radiotherapy alone (RT) or RT plus procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy (RT-PCV) given at 6-week intervals to a maximum of 12 courses (procarbazine 100 mg/m2 days 1 to 10, lomustine 100 mg/m2 day 1, and vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) day 1). A neuropathology panel independently reviewed all cases. To reliably detect a 10% increase in 2-year survival (from 15% to 25%), 600 patients were required.

RESULTS

Between September 1988 and May 1997, 15 United Kingdom centers randomized 674 patients (RT = 339 patients; RT-PCV = 335 patients). With a median follow-up for survivors of 3 years, 617 patients have died, (RT = 310 patients; RT-PCV = 307 patients). Median survival was 9.5 months for RT and 10 months for RT-PCV (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.11; log-rank P = .50). Tests for interaction revealed no significant differences in treatment effect according to tumor grade, age, performance status, or extent of neurosurgery.

CONCLUSION

This trial shows no benefit to PCV chemotherapy, and current data exclude an increase in median survival of more than 10 weeks and in a 1- or 2-year survival rate of more than 7% to 8%. This suggests that no-chemotherapy control arms remain ethical in randomized trials in high-grade astrocytoma.

Extraventricular cerebral anaplastic ependymomas

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic ependymomas are considered to be uncommon cerebral tumors by most authors. We have had the opportunity to study 34 cases of such lesions in 13 years.

METHODS

34 cases of anaplastic ependymoma operated in different hospitals of Maracaibo, Venezuela, during the period of 1983-1995 were analyzed. Cases of ependymoblastoma were excluded.

RESULTS

Adult patients made up most of the present series. All patients harbored supratentorial growths in locations distant from the ventricular system. The microscopic pattern was of limited value to establish prognosis, for there was no constant correlation between the histologic features and tumor relapse; only in sporadic cases in which high cell density and conspicuous mitotic activity were maximally expressed, did tumor relapse occur shortly after removal of the lesion.

CONCLUSION

This type of paradoxical behavior being the rule makes all attempts at predicting prognosis in these entities a disappointing task.

Brain tumors

This synthesis of the literature on radiotherapy for brain tumors, ie, cancer originating in the central nervous system (CNS), is based on 81 scientific articles, including 25 randomized studies, 13 prospective studies, and 25 retrospective studies. These studies involve 11,081 patients. A more comprehensive chapter on brain tumors may be ordered from SBU. Curative treatment is not available for patients with highly malignant glioma (grades III and IV). Postoperative radiotherapy for highly malignant glioma extends patients' survival, with good quality of life, by several weeks to several months. Virtually all patients die from this disease. Although the clinical benefits from radiotherapy, measured as survival, appear to be modest, it is more effective than any chemotherapy tested thus far. The clinical effects of radiotherapy for highly malignant glioma are improved only marginally by altering factors such as absorbed dose, fractionation, irradiated tissue volume, radiation quality, or by adding radiosensitizing substances. Radiotherapy alone usually provides a clear but temporary improvement in patients with highly malignant glioma, hence it clearly has a palliative benefit. Postoperative radiotherapy for low-grade malignant gliomas (grades I and II) may extend survival. It also reduces tumor volume. No evidence shows that radiotherapy alone or postoperatively can lead to cure. In patients who have undergone subtotal meningioma resection, postoperative radiotherapy substantially reduces the risk for recurrence and extends life, and is thereby indicated. Radiotherapy is not indicated following macroscopic radical meningioma surgery. Patients with brain metastases experience rapid neurological improvement following radiotherapy to the whole brain, and this palliative effect often remains throughout the remainder of the patient's life. Palliative radiotherapy, often to large volumes of the CNS, is therefore motivated in a large proportion of the patient groups. In a smaller group of patients with solitary metastases, radiotherapy may be given postoperatively following radical neurosurgery. Life may be extended in this group, otherwise radiotherapy does not influence survival. Stereotactic radiotherapy of solitary, mainly spherical metastases in the brain is often superior to other known methods with respect to palliation and survival. The number of patients is, however, relatively small.

Accelerated radiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme: a dose searching prospective study

The EORTC Radiotherapy Cooperative Group performed a prospective phase II study in glioblastoma multiforme using accelerated radiotherapy in escalating doses. The aims of the study were to investigate acute and late toxicity as well as tumor response and survival. Only the CT-enhanced tumor zone plus a margin of 2-3 cm were treated (mean volume, 1034 +/- 477 cm3). Radiotherapy was administered with 5-18 MV photons. The radiation schedule consisted of 3 fractions of 2 Gy/day, separated with at least 4 h. The first group of patients was scheduled to receive a total dose of 42 Gy, 21 fractions in 9 days. The total dose was then escalated up to 48 Gy (24 fractions in 10 days), 54 Gy (27 fractions in 11 days) and 60 Gy (30 fractions in 12 days). The numbers of patients entered in each dose-level group were 15, 17, 18 and 16, respectively. Acute toxicity was mild, nausea/vomiting was absent in 91% of the patients. In 80% of the patients the neurological condition improved or remained stable compared with the start of radiotherapy but in 58% of the patients steroids were necessary, either increased in dose or initiated. Acute toxicity did not increase with increasing radiation doses although patients treated with 60 Gy more often required steroids than the other groups. Late toxicity was strongly suspected in 2 patients receiving 52 Gy and 56 Gy, respectively. Within the whole group of 66 patients only one recurrence outside the primary site was found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pre-radiation chemotherapy in glioma patients with poor prognostic factors

Nineteen patients in an age group from 56-67 years (mean age 62.5 years) with histologically verified glioblastoma multiforme were treated with chemotherapy consisting of two cycles of oral CCNU, intravenous vincristine and oral procarbazine prior to radiation therapy. Ten of the patients had stable disease, monitored by CT scan and neurological examination, and received whole brain radiation. The median survival was 12 months. Nine patients who had progressive disease during chemotherapy did not receive radiation treatment and were put on palliative treatment with dexamethasone. This group had a median survival of 3 months. The median survival in all of the 19 patients who entered the study was 9 months which was comparable to the survival of 56 patients with glioblastoma multiforme who, in a retrospective study, received post-operative radiotherapy. The most important factor predicting survival was steroid-dependency after surgery.

A population-based study on the incidence and survival rates of 3857 glioma patients diagnosed from 1953 to 1984

Intracranial glioma was diagnosed during the patient's life and histologically verified in 3857 patients between 1953 and 1984 in Finland. Their survival up to the end of 1987 was analyzed, the follow-up being complete. The treatment was by operation in 1193 cases, radiation in 459 cases, both operation and radiation in 1486 cases, and neither operation nor radiation in 719 cases. The 1-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year cumulative relative survival rates were 0.53, 0.29, 0.20, and 0.18, respectively. The newborn to 14-year-olds lost 56% of their life expectancy; the 15-year-olds to 44-year-olds, 71%; the 45-year-olds to 64-year-olds, 88%; and the 65-year-olds to 99-year-olds, 91%. According to the model with the best fit in regression analysis the prognosis was significantly better among young, recently diagnosed patients who had undergone both operation and radiation.

A randomized study of chemotherapy with procarbazine, vincristine, and lomustine with and without radiation therapy for astrocytoma grades 3 and/or 4

The authors undertook a controlled, prospective, randomized study of 171 patients with supratentorial astrocytoma grades 3 and/or 4 (classified according to Kernohan). All patients were given chemotherapy consisting of procarbazine, vincristine, and lomustine (CCNU) (PVC). Half of the patients received whole-brain irradiation (RT) to a dose of 5800 cGy in the tumor-bearing hemisphere and 5000 cGy in the contralateral hemisphere. After diagnosis of progressive tumor growth, patients received individual treatment. The endpoint of the study was time to progression, but cases were followed until the patients died. Median time to progression (MTP) for the whole randomized population was 21 weeks. Median survival time (MST) was 53 weeks; 18% of patients survived for 2 years or longer. Survival analysis showed that patients less than 50 years of age treated with PVC plus RT had significantly longer MTP (81 weeks) and MST (124 weeks) than all other patients. For patients less than 50 years of age treated with PVC alone, MTP was 21 weeks and MST was 66 weeks. For patients more than 50 years of age treated with PVC plus RT, MTP was 23 weeks and MST was 51 weeks; in the PVC group, MTP was 17 weeks and MST was 39 weeks. Age, Karnofsky index, areas of Grade 2, and absence of extensive necrosis in the tumor were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analyses. Patients less than 50 years of age treated with PVC plus RT had significantly longer survival (P = 0.037) when correcting for these factors in a multi-variate analysis.

Combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and irradiation of malignant gliomas

Seventy-nine patients with malignant gliomas (19 anaplastic astrocytomas and 60 glioblastoma multiforme) received 4 cycles of infra-ophthalmic carotid injection of 160 mg carmustine, 2 mg vincristine IV and procarbazine orally 50 mg 3 times daily for 1 week, followed by whole-brain irradiation, with a midpoint dose of 54 Gy/6 weeks. Response, judged by CT-scan, was seen in 31 out of 57 evaluable patients with a median survival of 30 months and 40% survival at 3 years. In all patients who responded to the treatment, a tumour regression was seen on CT-scan after chemotherapy before irradiation. In the 26 patients with progressive disease under chemotherapy, the median survival was 5 months. None of the patients who had progressive disease during chemotherapy had benefit from irradiation. The most important prognostic factors were good pretreatment performance status, glucocorticoid dependency and age. Few serious side-effects of the angiographic procedure were seen. Leukoencephalopathy was not observed in this study.

"Instant-mix" whole brain photon with neutron boost radiotherapy for malignant gliomas

From July 1985 through March 1987, 44 consecutive patients with supratentorial, nonmetastatic anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were treated with whole brain photon irradiation with concomitant neutron boost at the University of Chicago. All patients had biopsy proven disease and surgery ranged from biopsy to total gross excision. Whole brain photon radiation was given at 1.5 Gy per fraction, 5 days weekly for a total dose of 45 Gy in 6 weeks. Neutron boost radiation was prescribed to a target minimum dose that included the pre-surgical CT tumor volume plus 1 cm margin. Neutrons were administered 5-20 minutes prior to photon radiation twice weekly and a total dose of 5.2 Gyn gamma was administered over 6 weeks. Median follow-up was 36 months. The median survival was 40.3 months for anaplastic astrocytoma (10 patients) and 11 months for glioblastoma multiforme (34 patients) and 12 months for the overall group. Variables that predicted longer median survival included histology (AA vs. GBM), age (less than or equal to 39 years vs. older), and extent of surgery (total gross or partial excision vs. biopsy) whereas tumor size and Karnofsky performance status did not have a significant influence. The median survival of the anaplastic astrocytoma group was better than expected compared to the RTOG 80-07 study (a dose-finding study of similar design to this study) and historical data. Reasons for this are discussed.

Therapy and survival of adult patients with intracranial glioma in a defined population

During the 3 years 1978-1980 146 adult patients with intracranial glioma were diagnosed in the Province of Uusimaa in southern Finland. The median survival of all patients was 15 months, of glioblastoma (n = 41) 5.1 months, of anaplastic astrocytoma (n = 29) 12.4 months, of benign grade I-II astrocytoma (n = 30) 93.5 months, of other glioma 82.9 months (n = 27), and of probable glioma 9.8 months (n = 19); 22 patients are still alive 8.9-11.9 years after diagnosis. The patients who were 15-44 years of age at the time of diagnosis survived 75.4 months in the median (n = 58), 45-64 years 10.5 months (n = 61) and 65 years or older 4.8 months (n = 27); 96 patients were operated, 89 received radiotherapy and 34 chemotherapy. According to the proportional hazards' model, follow-up time, age and histological type of tumor were statistically highly significant in explaining differences in survival.

Critical appraisal of experimental radiation modalities for malignant astrocytomas

The management of patients with supratentorial malignant astrocytomas has remained a major problem. Patients continue to die from a lack of local control in 90% of cases despite an improvement of median survival seen with the use of postoperative radiation therapy. Because of this, there has been considerable interest in exploring novel ways of possibly improving results. This paper reviews the rationale and clinical results with the use of altered fractionation schemes, brachytherapy, radiation sensitizers, hyperthermia, particle therapy, and radiosurgery in the treatment of these patients. Currently, there is no demonstrated advantage with the use of these experimental modalities in the initial management of patients. There would appear to be some benefit for selected patients who are treated with brachytherapy at recurrence, but its efficacy as part of initial management remains to be determined determined in ongoing randomized prospective trials.

Chemotherapy for malignant gliomas of the brain: a review of ten-years experience

In recent years, there has been a great improvement in the knowledge of the biological aspects of malignant gliomas of the brain. Conversely, there has been an increase of interest in the multimodal treatment of these tumours. In this review, we have analyzed the results of the several reports which have appeared in the literature that deal with the chemotherapeutic treatment of malignant gliomas. Furthermore, some areas of biological investigation that could have an impact on pharmacological therapy are discussed.

Sensitization of hypoxic tumour cells--clinical experience

There is substantial evidence for the presence of hypoxia in human tumours. This is documented by histopathological demonstration of vascular insufficiency, direct oxygen measurements in tumours, as well as by physiological imaging and mapping of hypoxic areas. As a consequence, clinical trials have focused on the hypoxia problem for more than 30 years. This includes the use of hyperbaric oxygen, hypoxic cell radiosensitizers, and, more recently, modification of the oxygen-unloading capacity of haemoglobin. Agents directed towards destruction of hypoxic cells have also been applied, such as hyperthermia and bio-reductive drugs. Despite decades of clinical trials, the results are still inconclusive, and although some trials have shown significant benefit, it has become apparent that hypoxia is a complex problem. Hypoxia appears to be especially a problem in certain tumour types (e.g. squamous cell carcinoma), but even within tumours of the same type, site, and stage, hypoxia does not occur to the same extent. Furthermore, there are increasing suggestions that hypoxia may occur in two principally different ways, namely acutely and chronically, yielding varying responses to modifying agents. Although improvement in hypoxic cell radiosensitizers and other agents is under way, a definitive solution to the hypoxia problem will not be found until the tumours in which hypoxia occurs can be identified. This will require detailed analysis of individual tumours and patients' parameters, and better knowledge of the mechanisms of reoxygenation in clonogenic tumour cells.

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of gliomas in adults

Glioblastomas and previously irradiated recurrent gliomas remain incurable. Chemotherapy is able to palliate patients by shrinking tumors, thereby improving neurological status and quality of life. Chemotherapy may also be capable of prolonging survival in some instances. The effectiveness of chemotherapy against gliomas is comparable to the efficacy of chemotherapy against many other solid tumors. When given in an adjuvant setting along with radiation postoperatively, studies suggest that the nitrosoureas, dibromodulcitol, dianhydrogalactitol, procarbazine, teniposide, dacarbazine, and cisplatin may possibly be useful, although results for many of these drugs are inconclusive. Some chemotherapy combinations also appear to be useful in an adjuvant setting, particularly BCNU plus ifosfamide, BCNU plus cisplatin, CCNU plus dibromodulcitol, and CCNU plus lonidamine. However, there is not yet conclusive evidence that combination chemotherapy is superior to single agent adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of gliomas. While the use of chemotherapy prior to postoperative cranial radiation is worthy of further study, it has not to date proven to be more effective than chemotherapy combined with radiation. In patients whose tumors have recurred following radiation, palliation may be achieved with the nitrosoureas, procarbazine, teniposide, and diaziquone. Cisplatin, high dose methotrexate, the interferons, and a variety of other medications also may be of use. As in the case of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy combinations for recurrent tumor have not been conclusively demonstrated to be superior to single agent treatment, although some CCNU-based combinations are of interest. Many different chemotherapy drugs have been administered by intracarotid infusion. There is a moderately high risk of serious local retinal and neurological toxicity using this approach, and efficacy has not been proven to be improved by this approach. However, further studies of intraarterial administration of chemotherapy are warranted in light of theoretical considerations, pharmacological observations of enhanced local drug concentrations, and the observation that patients who have failed the same drugs intravenously may respond when lower doses of the drug are administered intraarterially. In addition, some patients have had tumor shrinkage in the area infused while tumor has grown in other areas. Thus, while intracarotid chemotherapy must be regarded as still investigational and potentially quite toxic, further studies are indicated. High dose chemotherapy has been administered in combination with autologous bone marrow rescue. High response rates and prolonged survival durations have been reported in some instances, justifying further study despite substantial toxicity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Hypofractionated radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin in malignant cerebral gliomas. Rapid palliation in low performance status patients

Twenty-eight patients with high-grade cerebral gliomas (16 biopsy-proven and 12 diagnosed clinically and by computed tomography scan) were treated with altered fraction radiation and concomitant cisplatin (C-DDP). Twenty cases (Groups IA and IB) whose Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 60% or less received hypofractionation and C-DDP. All these patients had received high-dose Decadron (Merck Sharp & Dohme, West Point, PA), and their conditions were not improving or progressively deteriorating. The first 11 patients (Group IA) received from 600 cGy twice weekly to 3600 cGy over 3 weeks combined with C-DDP IV at 40 mg/M2 every 2 weeks for two courses. The nine subsequent patients (Group IB) received from 600 cGy weekly to 3600 cGy over 5 to 6 weeks with C-DDP IV at 40 mg/M2 every 1 to 2 weeks for four courses. The target volume in all cases was confined to the tumor as defined on computed tomography (CT) scan with a 2 cm to 3 cm margin. The C-DDP at 40 mg/M2 was administered immediately (within 5 minutes after radiation). Eight cases (Group II) with a KPS of more than 60% were treated with hyperfractionation, i.e., from 200 cGy twice daily to 4800 cGy in just under 3 weeks. The C-DDP was administered every 2 weeks for a total of two courses, as for Group IA. In Group I, 15 of 20 (75%) patients experienced rapid improvement in their performance status, which usually becoming evident within 1 to 2 weeks from the initiation of treatment, and progressed over time. Four patients with a KPS of 10% improved their KPS to over 60%. This regimen was both well tolerated and logistically very convenient both for the patients and attending staff. Follow-up CT scans in three of 16 evaluable patients in the hypofractionated group showed complete tumor resolution. Median survival for Group IA was 7 months, for Group IB was 12 months, and overall was eight months. The Group II median survival was 9 months. This experience suggests that hypofractionated radiation in combination with C-DDP may offer rapid palliation with improvement in functional status in severely compromised patients with malignant glioma.

Large dose fraction radiotherapy in the treatment of glioblastoma

Twenty-four adults with glioblastoma multiforme (astrocytoma, grade 4) underwent postoperative large dose fraction radiotherapy (LDFR; 5 Gy twice weekly) with Linac X-rays. The outcome in this group was compared with that of 26 patients who received conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFR; 2 Gy 5 times weekly). The time, dose, and fractionation (TDF) factor was about 100 in both groups. The survival rates following LDFR and CFR were, respectively, 63% vs 65% at 1 year; 36% vs 8% at 2 years; 17% vs 4% at 3 years; and 4% vs 0% at 5 years. Although the survival curve for LDFR was superior to that for CFR, the difference was not statistically significant. Autopsies of nine LDFR and 13 CFR patients showed no residual tumor in one case and no cases, respectively; small residual tumor in three cases in each group; extensive coagulation necrosis of the tumor and surrounding brain tissue in one LDFR and four CFR patients; tumor proliferation in three LDFR and four CFR cases; and mixed glioblastoma and fibrosarcoma in one LDFR and two CFR patients. These results suggest that maximum tumor removal followed by LDFR may offer a better prognosis for patients with glioblastoma than that offered by surgery plus CFR.

The effectiveness of chemotherapy for treatment of high grade astrocytoma in children: results of a randomized trial. A report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group

Fifty-eight patients with high-grade astrocytoma were treated by members of the Childrens Cancer Study Group in a prospective randomized trial designed to study the effectiveness of chemotherapy as an adjuvant to standard surgical treatment and radiotherapy. Following surgical therapy, patients were assigned randomly to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy consisting of chloroethyl-cyclohexyl nitrosourea, vincristine, and prednisone. Treatment with chemotherapy prolonged survival and event-free survival. Five-year event-free survival was 46% for patients in the radiotherapy and chemotherapy group, and 18% for patients in the radiotherapy-alone group. Five-year survival was similarly improved. The differences in outcome due to treatment were statistically significant after correcting for imbalances in important prognostic factors (event-free survival, p = 0.026; survival, p = 0.067). The presence of mitoses or necrosis in the tumor specimen was associated with poorer outcome. Patients whose initial surgery was limited to biopsy, and patients with basal ganglia lesions, also had significantly worse outcome. Chemotherapy administered at the time of recurrence in a small number of patients did not produce any long-term survivors. This study is to our knowledge the only randomized trial to investigate effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of high-grade astrocytoma in children.

Radiation treatment with twice a day fractionation versus conventional fractionation in high grade astrocytoma. A retrospective study

A consecutive series of 73 patients with high grade astrocytoma treated by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy was analysed. A total tumour dose of 60 Gy was delivered with either 2 Gy daily fractions (24 patients) or twice a day 1.5 Gy fractions, with a 4-hour-interval (49 patients). The analysis of survival with respect to patient variables showed that age and performance status were significant prognostic factors. As the type of fractionation was not randomly assigned, the comparison between the conventional schedule (CF) and the multifractionated schedule (MFD) was performed by means of a multivariate analysis adjusting for basic prognostic factors; CF proved to be significantly superior to MFD. The possible reasons for the disagreement between our results and the theoretical expectations in favour of MFD are discussed.

Retreatment of pediatric brain tumors with radiation and misonidazole. Results of a CCSG/RTOG phase I/II study

Twenty-nine patients with recurrent pediatric brain tumors after full-dose treatment with radiation were retreated with misonidazole (9 gm/m2) and whole-brain irradiation (300 rad X 10). Seventeen of 29 patients (59%) experienced nausea and vomiting with misonidazole administration and 6 patients (21%) developed peripheral neuropathy. Serum levels of misonidazole were similar to those reported for adults. One patient died of trauma shortly after retreatment. For the remaining 28 patients, the median time-to-progression was 5.5 months. Median survival was 13 months. Six patients (21%) developed radiation toxicity, two of whom died from the toxicity. Whereas the results on this study are similar to reported series of patients receiving salvage chemotherapy for recurrent pediatric brain tumors, more effective treatment clearly is needed.