Clinical evaluation of palliative therapy for unresectable primary liver cancer

Rupture of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review of Literature

Approximately 700,000 people die of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) each year worldwide, making it the third leading cause of cancer related deaths. Rupture is a potentially life-threatening complication of HCC. The incidence of HCC rupture is higher in Asia and Africa than in Europe. In Asia approximately 10% of patients with a diagnosis of HCC die due to rupture each year. Spontaneous rupture is the third most common cause of death due to HCC after tumor progression and liver failure. The diagnosis of rupture in patients without history of cirrhosis or HCC may be difficult. The most common symptom of ruptured HCC is abdominal pain (66-100%). Shock at presentation can be seen in 33-90% of cases; abdominal distension is reported in 33%. Abdominal paracentesis documenting hemoperitoneum is a reliable test to provisionally diagnose rupture of HCC, it can be seen in up to 86% of clinically suspected cases. The diagnoses can be confirmed by computed tomography scan or ultrasonography, or both in 75% of cases. Careful pre-treatment evaluation is essential to decide the best treatment option. Management of ruptured HCC involves multi-disciplinary care where hemostasis remains a primary concern. Earlier studies have reported a mortality rate of 25-75% in the acute phase of ruptured HCC. However, recent studies have reported a significant decrease in the incidence of mortality. There is also a decrease in the incidence of ruptured HCC due to improved surveillance and early detection of HCC. Transarterial Embolization is the least invasive method to effectively induce hemostasis in the acute stage with a success rate of 53-100%. Hepatic resection in the other hand has the advantage of achieving hemostasis and in the same go offers a potentially curative resection in selected patients.

Spontaneous rupture of hepatocelluar carcinoma: surgical resection and long-term survival

AIMS

Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a life-threatening event, particularly in patients with associated cirrhosis. We present our experience of hepatic resection of ruptured HCC.

METHODS

We performed 199 resections of hepatocellular carcinoma between January 1984 and December 1999. Six (3%) of these patients were operated on as an emergency because of haemoperitoneum: in five the liver was cirrhotic.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the operation was 195+/-101 min; all the patients received blood transfusions. The overall morbidity was 50%, with a mortality rate of 16.5%. Three patients were alive at 50, 80 and 116 months respectively; two had an intrahepatic recurrence treated by chemoembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-surgical treatment of spontaneously ruptured hepatocarcinoma should be performed only in patients with contraindication to surgery. Hepatic resection should be the treatment of choice since, according to our experience, long-term results are similar to those of elective surgery.

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and analysis of prognostic factors

A total of 100 patients with histologically proven hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and were followed for more than 1 year and 10 months. Portal vein branch thrombosis was diagnosed in 14 patients, and extrahepatic metastasis was noted in 11 subjects. The embolization material used was iodized oil (0.1-0.2 ml/cm tumor area at its maximal diameter), which was prepared by pumping with contrast agent and then mixed with anticancer drugs; Gelfoam particles measuring 1-2 mm in size were subsequently injected. The overall cumulative 0.5- 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 81%, 57%, 31%, and 21%, respectively. Patients with an intact capsule and those with solitary lesions, especially when the tumor diameter was < 5 cm, achieved a higher survival rate. In contrast, incomplete TACE, extrahepatic metastasis, and portal vein thrombosis were associated with the worst outcome. Patients with positive HBsAG and diffuse or multiple tumors also showed a poor outcome. Early diagnosis and early treatment of HCC are the keys for the achievement of better clinical results.

Hepatic arterial embolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma--a randomized controlled trial

A randomized controlled trial of hepatic arterial embolization was conducted in 63 consecutive patients who had unresectable but still embolizable hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients were randomized into three groups. Patients in group 1 received multiple hepatic arterial embolizations; patients in group 2 were given hepatic arterial embolization once, followed by monthly chemotherapy with high doses of 5-fluorouracil; and patients in group 3 received only monthly chemotherapy with high doses of 5-fluorouracil. Complete response was achieved in only 1 patient who received multiple hepatic arterial embolizations. Partial responses were observed in 13 patients (61.9%) in group 1, 10 patients (47.6%) in group 2, and 2 patients (9.5%) in group 3. The survival rates of patients in group 1 at the end of the ninth, 12th, 15th, 18th, and 21st months were 53.2%, 42.2%, 42.2%, 42.2%, and 42.2%, respectively, which were not significantly different from those of patients in group 2 but were better than the survival rates of patients in group 3. The results suggest that hepatic arterial embolization is an effective palliative treatment that prolongs survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.