Axillary lymph node dissection for intraductal breast carcinoma--is it indicated?

Is Axillary Assessment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Necessary in All Cases?

BACKGROUND

Staging of the axilla in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a point of controversy. We aimed to assess whether there is a group of patients in whom axillary assessment can be avoided and whether the likelihood of underdiagnosis of infiltrating carcinoma is sufficient to justify this evaluation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients who were operated on between 2008 and 2018 in three Spanish hospitals, with a diagnosis by radiological or excisional biopsy of DCIS and clinically and radiologically negative axilla.

RESULTS

A total of 530 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS were studied. An axillary assessment was performed in 77% of the patients. In 397 patients, selective sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Axillary involvement was found in 7.2% of all patients, which dropped to 2.15% if we only included DCIS diagnosed after a definitive anatomical pathology analysis. Underdiagnosis was correlated with the type of biopsy performed: the risk was 1.34 times as high if the biopsy was performed with a core needle. The risk of lymph node metastasis was higher when there was lymphovascular invasion and when mastectomy was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an axilla management algorithm in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS. The patients who would benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy would be those who are not candidates for breast-conserving surgery, those with a BIRADS 5 lesion biopsied by core-needle biopsy, and those whose definitive diagnosis is lymphovascular invasion.

Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer: Review of the literature

The high incidence and recurrence rate of breast cancer has influenced multiple strategies such as early detection with imaging, chemoprevention and surgical interventions that serve as preventive measures for women at high risk. Prophylactic mastectomy is one of the growing strategies of breast cancer risk reduction that is of a special importance for breast cancer gene mutation carriers. Women with personal history of cancerous breast lesions may consider ipsilateral or contralateral mastectomy as well. Existing data showed that mastectomy effectively reduces breast cancer risk. However, careful risk estimation is necessary to wisely select individuals who will benefit from preventing breast cancer.

Duct carcinoma in situ: A personal perspective

In the recent past, DCIS was a rare diagnosis established by biopsy of palpable breast masses or nipple changes. Mammography increased the frequency of a DCIS diagnosis by 20 × resulting in a tsunami of small circa 10 mm lesions detected only by mammography. The impact of pathologic technique in examining and characterizing such lesions is reviewed, and the development of algorithms incorporating prognostic factors and histology based on serial sequential processing techniques are described and contrasted with those which relied on tissue sampling. The development of the initial clinical trails of irradiation all demonstrated the significant benefit of irradiation but none could identify subsets with a more favorable outcome. The latter was precluded by their common practice of tissue sampling: Size could not be calculated and margin width and microinvasion could not be reliable demonstrated. Multigene signature assays are increasingly being utilized, most prominently Oncotype DCIS. However, these assays must be interpreted in conjunction with the limitations set forth in the validating studies-in the case of Oncotype DCIS-the size, margin width, and grade which defined the baseline study (E5194). Tamoxifen and other anti-hormonal agents (aromatase inhibitor therapy) have been shown to have a limited impact on ipsilateral recurrence which makes their use given their morbidities problematic. Such interventions do impact the frequency of contralateral occult in situ and invasive lesions. In the one study which permitted a comparison of local recurrence in irradiated vs nonirradiated breast, there was no added benefit of Tamoxifen in irradiated breasts. Some are attempting to identify a low-risk subset of DCIS which can be treated without surgical re-excision for margins or adjuvant irradiation. These studies are in progress but surrogates identified within the Van Nuys prospective series defined by grade and inadequate margins (≤ 1 mm) would suggest a significant recurrence and progression rate. DCIS remains a work in progress both in terms of classification and treatment. However, limited our progress in these areas we have certainly advanced from the oft-proclaimed mantra: "Radiation and Tamoxifen are standard of care."

Ductal carcinoma in situ current trends, controversies, and review of literature

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor, non-invasive malignancy confined within the basement membrane of the breast ductal system. There is a wide variation in the natural history of DCIS with an estimated incidence of progression to invasive ductal carcinoma being at least 13%-50% over a range of 10 or more years after initial diagnosis. Regardless of the treatment strategy, long-term survival is excellent. The controversy surrounding DCIS relates to preventing under-treatment, while also avoiding unnecessary treatments. In this article, we review the incidence, presentation, management options and surveillance of DCIS. Furthermore, we address several current controversies related to the management of DCIS, including margin status, sentinel node biopsy, hormonal therapy, the role of radiation in breast conservation surgery, and various risk stratification schemes.

Subclinical Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Treatment with Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy

Aims and Background

In spite of the fact that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a frequently encountered clinical problem, there is no consensus about the optimal treatment of clinically occult (i.e., mammographic presentation only) DCIS. Interest in breast conservation therapy has recently increased. Few data are available in Italy on the conservative treatment with surgery and adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective multi-institutional study was performed in 15 Radiation Oncology Departments in northern Italy involving 112 women with subclinical DCIS of the breast treated between 1982 and 1993. Age of the patients ranged between 32 and 72 years (median, 50 years). All of them underwent conservative surgery: quadrantectomy in 89, tumorectomy in 11, and wide excision in 12 cases. The most common histologic subtype was comedocarcinoma (37%). The median pathologic size was 10 mm (range 1 to 55 mm). Axillary dissection was performed in 83 cases: all the patients were node negative. All the patients received adjunctive radiation therapy with 60Co units (77%) or 6 MV linear accelerators (23%) for a median total dose to the entire breast of 50 Gy (mean, 49.48 Gy; range, 45-60 Gy). Seventy-six cases (68%) received a boost to the tumor bed at a dose of 8-20 Gy (median 10 Gy) for a minimum tumor dose of 58 Gy.

Results

At a median follow-up of 66 months, 8 local recurrences were observed, 4 intraductal and 4 invasive. All recurrent patients had a salvage mastectomy and are alive and free of disease at this writing. The 10-year actuarial overall, cause-specific, and recurrence-free survival was of 98.8%, 100%, and 91%, respectively.

Conclusions

The retrospective multicentric study, with a local control rate of more than 90% at 10 years with 100% cause-specific survival, showed that conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with occult, non-palpable DCIS.

Article Commentary: Surgical Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer

This article offers a review of the literature on current surgical management of the axilla in breast cancer. This includes the decision-making process involved in clinically node-negative patients versus clinically node-positive patients, with discussion of the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary dissection. It also examines the surgical axillary management of patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This article will help update practicing surgeons on the evolving research and guidelines for the management of breast cancer axillary disease.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be omitted in DCIS patients treated with breast conserving therapy

Breast cancer guidelines advise sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on core biopsy at high risk of invasive cancer or in case of mastectomy. This study investigates the incidence of SLNB and SLN metastases and the relevance of indications in guidelines and literature to perform SLNB in order to validate whether SLNB is justified in patients with DCIS on core biopsy in current era. Clinically node negative patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 with only DCIS on core needle biopsy were selected from a national database. Incidence of SLN biopsy and metastases was calculated. With Fisher exact tests correlation between SLNB indications and actual presence of SLN metastases was studied. Further, underestimation rate for invasive cancer and correlation with SLN metastases was analysed. 910 patients were included. SLNB was performed in 471 patients (51.8 %): 94.5 % had pN0, 3.0 % pN1mi and 2.5 % pN1. Patients undergoing mastectomy had 7 % SLN metastases versus 3.5 % for breast conserving surgery (BCS) (p = 0.107). The only factors correlating to SLN metastases were smaller core needle size (p = 0.01) and invasive cancer (p < 0.001). Invasive cancer was detected in 16.7 % by histopathology with 15.6 % SLN metastases versus only 2 % in pure DCIS. SLNB showed metastases in 5.5 % of patients; 3.5 % in case of BCS (any histopathology) and 2 % when pure DCIS was found at definitive histopathology (BCS and mastectomy). Consequently, SLNB should no longer be performed in patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy undergoing BCS. If definitive histopathology shows invasive cancer, SLNB can still be considered after initial surgery.

Is Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection Warranted for Patients with a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

BACKGROUND

Positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) findings in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) range from 1 to 22 % but have unknown biologic significance. This study sought to identify predictors of positive SLNs and to assess their clinical significance for patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS.

METHODS

The study identified 1234 patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS who underwent SLN dissection (SLND) at our institution from 1997 through 2011. Positive SLN findings were categorized as isolated tumor cells (ITCs) (≤0.2 mm), micrometastases (>0.2-2 mm), or macrometastases (>2 mm). Predictors of positive SLNs were analyzed, and survival outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Positive SLN findings were identified in 132 patients (10.7 %): 66 patients with ITCs (5.4 %), 36 patients with micrometastases (2.9 %), and 30 patients with macrometastases (2.4 %). Upstaging to microinvasive (n = 68, 5.5 %) or invasive (n = 259, 21.0 %) cancer occurred for 327 patients (26.5 %). Factors predicting positive SLNs included diagnosis by excisional biopsy (odds ratio [OR] 1.90; P = 0.007), papillary histology (OR 1.77; P = 0.006), DCIS larger than 2 cm (OR 1.55; P = 0.030), more than three interventions before SLND (4 interventions: OR 2.04; P = 0.022; ≥5 interventions: OR 3.87; P < 0.001), and occult invasion (microinvasive: OR 3.44; P = 0.001; invasive: OR 6.21; P < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 61.7 months. Patients who had pure DCIS with and without positive SLNs had equivalent survival rates (100.0 vs 99.7 %; P = 0.679). Patients with occult invasion and positive SLNs had the worst survival rate (91.7 %; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult invasion and more than three total interventions were the strongest predictors of positive SLN findings in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. This supports the theory of benign mechanical transport of breast epithelial cells. Except for patients at high risk for invasive disease, routine use of SLND in DCIS is not warranted.

An extremely rare salivary gland tumor: intraductal carcinoma of the buccal mucosa

Intraductal carcinoma of the salivary gland is a rare, indolent neoplasm characterized by intraductal malignant cell proliferation but lacking invasiveness, in contrast to conventional salivary duct carcinoma, a clinically aggressive neoplasm with invasive characteristics. The tumor affects the major salivary glands much more frequently than the minor salivary glands. This report describes an extremely rare intraductal carcinoma arising from the buccal mucosa in a 61-year-old man who presented with a painless mass in the left buccal mucosa, which he had had for 1 month. A biopsy of the tumor indicated it was most likely an adenocarcinoma, but accurate preoperative diagnosis was difficult. The tumor was completely removed, along with sufficient margins. Histological examination revealed that the lesion was composed of proliferating epithelial cells surrounded by an intact myoepithelial layer, with no evidence of invasion. The final diagnosis was intraductal carcinoma of the salivary gland. No recurrence has been observed for over 3 years. In conclusion, the difficulty in preoperatively diagnosing this rare entity suggests that complete surgical excision with sufficient margins remains the best treatment option.

International variation in management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) incidence has grown with the implementation of screening and its detection varies across International Cancer Screening Network (ICSN) countries. The aim of this survey is to describe the management of screen-detected DCIS in ICSN countries and to evaluate the potential for treatment related morbidity.

METHODS

We sought screen-detected DCIS data from the ICSN countries identified during 2004-2008. We adopted standardised data collection forms and analysis and explored DCIS diagnosis and treatment processes ranging from pre-operative diagnosis to type of surgery and radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twelve countries contributed data from a total of 15 screening programmes, all from Europe except the United States of America and Japan. Among women aged 50-69 years, 7,176,050 screening tests and 5324 screen-detected DCIS were reported. From 21% to 93% of DCIS had a pre-operative diagnosis (PO); 67-90% of DCIS received breast conservation surgery (BCS), and in 41-100% of the cases this was followed by radiotherapy; 6.4-59% received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only and 0.8-49% axillary dissection (ALND) with 0.6% (range by programmes 0-8.1%) being node positive. Among BCS patients 35% received SLNB only and 4.8% received ALND. Starting in 2006, PO and SLNB use increased while ALND remained stable. SLNB and ALND were associated with larger size and higher grade DCIS lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in DCIS management among screened women is wide and includes lymph node surgery beyond what is currently recommended. This indicates the presence of varying levels of overtreatment and the potential for its reduction.

Ductal carcinoma in situ: an overview

Advances in methods used to diagnose breast cancer have resulted in the increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ; most of these are detected by screening mammograms and are confirmed by core needle biopsy. Currently, classification schemas are moving toward a molecular approach. Treatment options for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are multiple and take into consideration end points such as local, regional or distant recurrence, overall survival and quality of life. Treatment methods continue to be controversial and debated in the oncology community. The quality of local control is multifactorial and depends on adequate surgical clearance, biological characteristics of the tumor, clinical presentation and the possibility of radiation therapies.

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a potentially invasive neoplasm. Risk factors include high estrogen states such as use of oral contraceptive (OC) pills, nulliparity, advanced age at first birth, and also family history and genetic mutations. The incidence of this usually clinically silent condition has risen in the past few decades due to widespread screening and diagnostic mammography, with final diagnosis confirmed by biopsy. At present, treatment options include total or simple mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation. Adjuvant therapy includes antiestrogens like tamoxifen and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) suppression therapy. With the latest advances in chemotherapy and better understanding on the pathogenesis of the lesion, it is anticipated that more effective modalities of treatment may soon be available.

Incidence and possible pathogenesis of sentinel node micrometastases in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast detected using molecular whole lymph node assay

Background:

The pathogenesis of lymph node metastases in preinvasive breast cancer – ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) – remains controversial. The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) assay is a novel molecular method that can assess a whole node and detect clinically relevant metastases. In this retrospective cohort study, we determined the performance of the OSNA assay in DCIS and the pathogenesis of node-positive DCIS.

Methods:

The subjects consisted of 623 patients with DCIS who underwent sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy. Of these, 2-mm-sectioned nodes were examined using frozen-section (FS) histology in 338 patients between 2007 and 2009, while 285 underwent OSNA whole node assays between 2009 and 2011. The SN-positivity rate was compared between cohorts, and the characteristics of OSNA-positive DCIS were investigated.

Results:

The OSNA detected more cases of SN metastases than FS histology (12 out of 285, 4.2% vs 1 out of 338, 0.3%). Most of the metastases were micrometastases. The characteristics of high-risk DCIS (i.e., mass formation, size, grade, and comedo) and preoperative breast biopsy (i.e., methods or time to surgery) were not valid for OSNA assay–positive DCIS.

Conclusion:

The OSNA detects more SN metastases in DCIS than FS histology. Further examination of the primary tumours and follow-up of node-positive DCIS are needed to elucidate the pathogenesis.

C-Erb-b2 oncogene expression in intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast

The ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) classification which proposes new approaches to the diagnosis, terminology and differential diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast was applied to a series of female patients comprising C-erbB2 oncogene expression which may serve as an adjunct to the morphology by immunohistochemistry. The study was performed using the data of 94 patients. There was no difficulty encountered in the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia (IDH). In patients with Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia (AIDH), the diagnosis could be made by using the 2-mm rule of the DIN classification in patients who exhibited cytologic and structural characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) alone or in conjunction with classical IDH patterns. However, in lesions that mimicked classical IDH patterns despite displaying cytological features of in situ carcinomas, the experience and view point of the pathologist played a more prominent role. When the DIN classification criteria were applied to grade DCIS lesions, although the system was found to be practical, it did not provide adequate differentiation in intermediate grade (grade II-DIN 2) patients and further improvement was considered desirable. Fourty-five cases (47.8%) IDH, 19 (20.2%) AIDH, and 30 (31.9%) were DCIS. There were statistically significant differences in the levels of c-erbB2 oncogene expression between IDH, AIDH and DCIS lesions (p<0.001). In DCISs, grade, cell size, pleomorphic nuclear atypia showed statistically significant associations with c-erbB2 oncogene expression. These results suggest that c-erbB2 oncogene expression is a valuable marker in the differential diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of patients with intraductal proliferative lesions.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of the axilla in ductal carcinoma in situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast historically has been a disease detected by physical examination, diagnosed by open surgical biopsy, and treated by mastectomy and axillary dissection. It is now increasingly detected by screening mammography, diagnosed by needle core biopsy, and treated by lumpectomy, with axillary dissection having been abandoned and sentinel node biopsy being used in axillary staging. However, outcomes related to sentinel node biopsy in DCIS have not been validated in well-controlled clinical trials. Current guideline recommendations are to use sentinel node biopsy when needle core biopsy is highly suspicious for invasive cancer or where there is a high-risk DCIS when lumpectomy identifies invasive breast cancer with the DCIS, or when mastectomy is performed for extensive DCIS. Routine use of sentinel node biopsy for DCIS is not supported.

The pen and the scalpel: effect of diffusion of information on nonclinical variations in surgical treatment

BACKGROUND

As information is disseminated about best practices, variations in patterns of care should diminish over time.

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypotheses that differences in rates of a surgical procedure are associated with type of insurance in an era of evolving practice guidelines and that insurance and site differences diminish with time as consensus guidelines disseminate among the medical community.

METHODS

We use lymph node dissection among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as an example of a procedure with uncertain benefit. Using a sample of 1051 women diagnosed from 1985 through 2000 at 2 geographic sites, we collected detailed demographic, clinical, pathologic, and treatment information through abstraction of multiple medical records. We specified multivariate logistic models with flexible functions of time and time interactions with insurance and treatment site to test hypotheses.

RESULTS

Lymph node dissection rates varied significantly according to site of treatment and insurance status after controlling for clinical, pathologic, treatment, and demographic characteristics. Rates of lymph node dissection decreased over time, and differences in lymph node dissection rates according to site and generosity of insurance were no longer significant by the end of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated that rates of a discretionary surgical procedure differ according to nonclinical factors, such as treatment site and type of insurance, and that such unwarranted variation decreases over time with diminishing uncertainty and in an era of diffusion of clinical guidelines.

The value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with microinvasion of the breast

AIM

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) refers to the preinvasive stage of breast carcinoma and should not give axillary metastases. Its diagnosis, however, is subject to sampling errors. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in management of DCIS or DCISM (with microinvasion) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SLNB in DCIS and DCISM.

METHODS

A review of 51 patients with a diagnosis of DCIS (n=45) or DCISM (n=6), who underwent SLNB and a definitive breast operation between January 1999 and December 2006, was performed.

RESULTS

In 10 patients (19.6%) definitive histology revealed an invasive carcinoma. SLN (micro)metastases were detected in 5 out of 51 patients, of whom 2 had a preoperative diagnosis of grade III DCIS and 3 of DCISM. Three patients (75%) had micrometastases (< 2 mm) only. In 2 patients, histopathology demonstrated a macrometastasis (> 2 mm). All 5 patients underwent axillary dissection. No additional positive axillary lymph nodes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of a preoperative diagnosis of grade III DCIS or a grade II DCIS with comedo necrosis and DCIS with microinvasion, an SLNB procedure has to be considered because in almost 20% of the patients an invasive carcinoma is found after surgery. In this case the SLNB procedure becomes less reliable after a lumpectomy or ablation has been performed. SLN (micro)metastases were detected in nearly 10% of the patients. The prognostic significance of individual tumour cells remains unclear.

Atypical presentations of screen-detected DCIS Implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention

Few series are published on DCIS that forms parenchymal lesions on screening mammograms. The implications of these unusual presentations for pre-operative assessment and surgical intervention are of interest. In the setting of a large, population-based breast cancer screening program, the diagnostic and management implications of DCIS presenting as parenchymal lesions on screening mammograms are investigated. A total of 125 lesions (20.1% of all DCIS) presented as a mass (n=99) or microcalcifications with an associated parenchymal lesion (n=26). Cytology was positive in 47.1% of cases. Core biopsy diagnosed DCIS in 68.4% of cases. Breast surgery after a definite preoperative diagnosis achieved negative initial margins in 69.4% case, versus 54.7% without a pre-operative malignant diagnosis. The mastectomy rate was 26.4%. Axillary surgery was carried out in 32.8% cases, including axillary clearance in 26.4% of cases. One in five cases of DCIS detected during mammographic screening has features other than pure microcalcifications. This has implications for pre-operative assessment and surgical management.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in staging small (up to 15 mm) breast carcinomas. Results from a European multi-institutional study

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the preferred method for the nodal staging of early breast cancer, but controversy exists regarding its universal use and consequences in small tumors. 2929 cases of breast carcinomas not larger than 15 mm and staged with SLN biopsy with or without axillary dissection were collected from the authors' institutions. The pathology of the SLNs included multilevel hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was commonly used for cases negative with HE staining. Variables influencing SLN involvement and non-SLN involvement were studied with logistic regression. Factors that influenced SLN involvement included tumor size, multifocality, grade and age. Small tumors up to 4 mm (including in situ and microinvasive carcinomas) seem to have SLN involvement in less than 10%. Non-SLN metastases were associated with tumor grade, the ratio of involved SLNs and SLN involvement type. Isolated tumor cells were not likely to be associated with further nodal load, whereas micrometastases had some subsets with low risk of non-SLN involvement and subsets with higher proportion of further nodal spread. In situ and microinvasive carcinomas have a very low risk of SLN involvement, therefore, these tumors might not need SLN biopsy for staging, and this may be the approach used for very small invasive carcinomas. If an SLN is involved, isolated tumor cells are rarely if ever associated with non-SLN metastases, and subsets of micrometastatic SLN involvement may be approached similarly. With macrometastases the risk of non-SLN involvement increases, and further axillary treatment should be generally indicated.

Is there an indication for sentinel node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast? A review

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is defined as a proliferation of malignant epithelial cells within breast ducts without evidence of invasion through the basement membrane. The detection rate of DCIS of the breast has dramatically increased since the mid-1980s as the result of the widespread use of screening mammography. DCIS currently represents about 15-25% of all breast cancers detected in population screening programmes. Although inherently a non-invasive disease, occult invasion with the potential of lymph node metastases may occur. Where performing an axillary lymph node dissection-or-not for DCIS used to be an important dilemma, the same now holds for the sentinel node biopsy. This article reviews the potential role of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in patients with DCIS. We conclude that based on the current literature, there is in general no role for a SNB in DCIS. A SNB should only be considered in patients with an excisional biopsy diagnosis of high risk DCIS (grade III with palpable mass or large tumour area by imaging) as well as in patients undergoing mastectomy after a core or excisional biopsy diagnosis of DCIS, although SNB may be contraindicated in many of the latter patients because of lesion size and/or multifocality. Even in these patients the value of a positive SN, containing mostly isolated tumour cells, is questionable.

Is it possible to refine the indication for sentinel node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?

BACKGROUND

The indication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has not been fully established yet for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

AIM

To relate the conversion rate to invasive carcinoma with sentinel node positivity in high risk DCIS, and to refine the clinical presentation analysis in order to better select patients for SNB. For this purpose, a risk score was devised.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2005, 151 high-risk DCIS patients from six clinical centres were included in a prospective sentinel node database. The conversion rate to invasive carcinoma was 39%. Ten of 142 (7%) successful SNBs showed a positive sentinel node (eight micrometastatic). The sentinel node was positive in 1% of pure DCIS, in 5.5% of DCIS with micro-invasion, and in 19.5% of invasive carcinoma.

RESULTS

Both clinical presentation and corresponding risk score were closely related to conversion to invasive carcinoma. The association of risk score and sentinel node positivity approached but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.06); therefore a subset of further selected higher risk patients could not be defined.

CONCLUSION

The relevance of SNB positivity cannot be overlooked in high-risk DCIS patients, however, because SNB is not free from morbidity and cost, more studies are needed to refine its final indication.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Current Controversies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced the routine level I and II axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for women with clinically node-negative T1 and T2 breast cancer. Studies have shown that SLNB is highly predictive of axillary nodal status with a false-negative of rate less than 10%. Our purpose was to address some of the ongoing controversies about this procedure, including technical issues, use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, internal mammary lymph node biopsy, criteria for patient selection (in intraductal carcinoma?), its staging accuracy, and the clinical approach when a SLNB was found to be negative or positive on pathologic examination. After the revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for breast cancer in 2002, the evaluation of internal mammary lymph nodes and determination of micrometastases by hematoxylin-eosin or by immunohistochemistry have become increasingly important in staging of patients. Recent guideline recommendations developed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Expert Panel in 2005 are also discussed. Long-term follow-up results of ongoing studies will provide more accurate assessment of the prognostic significance of SLNB and its value in the prevention of breast cancer-related morbidity in axillary staging compared to ALND.

CHANGES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DUCTAL CARCINOMA IN SITU BEFORE THE RELEASE OF CLINICAL PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS IN AUSTRALIA: THE CASE IN VICTORIA

BACKGROUND

This study examines changes in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ between 1995 and 1999 in the Australian State of Victoria. This period was before the release of Australian treatment recommendations.

METHODS

All new cases of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed between 1 April and 30 September in 1995 and 1999 were identified from the population cancer registry. Treating surgeons completed a questionnaire on the presentation and management of each case. In 1995, 64 out of 70 surgeons returned questionnaires for 137 cases (case response, 94%). In 1999, 68 surgeons treated 159 registered cases and 141 completed surveys were returned (case response, 89%).

RESULTS

More cases underwent an image-guided biopsy in 1999 (54%) than in 1995 (34%). Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was used to treat 69% of cases in 1999 and 63% in 1995. The use of axillary procedures (clearance or sampling) for women treated by mastectomy decreased from 61% in 1995 to 30% in 1999. More patients treated with BCS had margins simply described as "clear" in 1995 (49%) than in 1999 (21%). In 1995, only 7% of cases treated with BCS had radiotherapy, and this was 25% in 1999.

CONCLUSION

In both 1999 and 1995, the majority of patients were treated by BCS, but only a minority received radiotherapy.

An update of sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to further clarify the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients that are upstaged upon final pathology and/or have metastatic disease in the axilla.

METHODS

All patients were diagnosed with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISm) on their diagnostic biopsy and received a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy between 1994 and 2004. Six hundred seventy-five patients were divided into 613 patients with DCIS and 62 patients with DCISm.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of 675 (10%) were upstaged to invasive cancer. Fifty-five of 613 (9%) patients with DCIS were upstaged, whereas 11 of 62 (18%) patients with DCISm were upstaged. Forty-nine of 675 (7%) patients had +SLN. Twenty-two of 49 (45%) patients with +SLN had invasive carcinoma or DCISm on final histology.

CONCLUSIONS

After review of histology, grade, type of biopsy, and mammographic findings, the combined findings of high grade, mass by mammography, and microinvasion predict patients at higher risk for invasive carcinoma. Selective utilization of SLN biopsy in DCIS is recommended.

EXPERIENCE OF SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY ALONE IN EARLY BREAST CANCER WITHOUT FURTHER AXILLARY DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH NEGATIVE SENTINEL NODE

AIMS

The aims of surgical therapy of breast cancer are loco-regional tumour control and staging. Axillary staging is still considered the single most important prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Surgical removal of axillary nodes remains the standard way to assess their involvement in most centres. The morbidity associated with axillary dissection (AD) is well recognized. In recent years sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has evolved. Multiple studies suggest it has the same accuracy as AD in axillary staging and less morbidity in early breast cancer (EBC). SNB has become the standard of practice in EBC in many parts of the world. In Australia, the preference has been to wait for the results of the Sentinel Node versus Axillary Clearance (SNAC) trial as well as other international trials before accepting SNB as a standard of care. The experience of a single surgeon with SNB alone in EBC without further completion axillary dissection (CAD) in negative sentinel node (SLN) is described in the present paper.

METHODS

An audit was done of the senior author's prospective data from the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons database. Other information was added retrospectively from case notes.

RESULTS

Between December 2000 and December 2003, 154 EBC cases (153 patients) underwent SNB alone. An average of four SLN was removed. Of these cases, 31.8% had positive SLNs (excluding 2.6% cases that had isolated tumour cells), of these, 93.9% had metastases (39.1% micro- and 60.9% macro-metastases) in axillary-SLN (ASLN) and almost all of these had CAD. ASLNs were the only positive nodes in 73.9%. Extra-ASLN retrieved in 68.8% of 34% demonstrated on lymphoscintigraphy. Of these, 12.1% were positive (6.1% micro- and macro-metastases each), all internal mammary. Mean follow up was 22.1 months. There was one local-regional-systemic and one systemic recurrence over this time.

CONCLUSION

SNB has a valid role in staging of the axilla particularly in low-risk patients. After adequate self audit, SNB offers a minimal morbidity and reliable method of axillary staging. Patients choosing SNB alone must understand that the long-term results of the randomized controlled trial are still pending for level I evidence of long-term efficacy.

Prélèvement de ganglions sentinelles dans les carcinomes intracanalaires du sein (± micro-invasion)

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to define the interest of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the staging of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS with micro-invasion (DCISM) in patients with breast carcinoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From June 1999 to December 2002 we listed, in a retrospective study, 52 patients treated surgically for a DCIS or a DCISM. All except one had an histology before surgery, and all had SLNB. Intraoperative imprint cytology of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was performed then there were analysed by staining with hematoxylin-eosin. Patients with positive SLN underwent complete axillary dissection.

RESULTS

It was removed an average of three SLNs by patient (extreme 1 to 6). Metastases in the SLN were detected in four (7,7%) of the 52 patients, including three cases had only micrometastases in the SLN. In the four patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SLN were the only positives nodes.

CONCLUSION

The SLNB for DCIS and DCISM increases the involvement rate of lymph node. Because of the widespread for early detection of breast cancer, it is noted a regular increase in the rate of DCIS. Even if the attitude to be had towards the lymph node metastases in these cases is not yet well defined, and so only 2% of the patients approximately die of this pathology, it is interesting because of increase in absolute value of mortality, to try to improve the prognosis criteria to modify the treatment of this pathology.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer

BACKGROUND

Forty-three years after the first description of the sentinel lymph node technique in malignant tumours of the parotid by Gould, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNLB) has become a precious tool in the treatment of solid tumours.

METHODS

In the following review we give a synopsis of the fundamentals of the sentinel lymph node concept and then proceed to an overview of recent advances of SNLB in gastrointestinal cancers.

RESULTS

In some tumour entities, SNLB has been shown to reflect reliably the lymph node status of the tumour-draining lymph node basin. In melanoma and breast cancer, it became a widely accepted element of the routine surgical management of these malignant diseases. In gastrointestinal tumours, the technique is currently under intense investigation. First reports on its application in other solid tumours, such as non-small cell lung cancer, thyroid carcinoma, oropharyngeal carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and Merckel cell carcinoma of the skin, were published more recently.

CONCLUSION

SNLB has become an important component of diagnosis and treatment of solid tumours. A growing number of publications on SNLB in gastrointestinal cancer documents the interest of many investigators in the application of this technique in this tumour entity. As long as imaging techniques like 18FDG PET or other molecular imaging techniques are limited by their spatial resolution, SNLB remains the technique of choice for lympho-nodal staging.

Sentinel lymph node as a new marker for therapeutic planning in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Literature review suggests that the sentinel lymph node (sN) represents a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients; however, some important issues, such as the optimisation of the technique for the intraoperative identification of the sN, the role of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sN, and the clinical implications of sN metastasis as regards the surgical management of the axilla, still require further confirmation. The authors aimed (1) to assess the feasibility of sN identification with a combined approach (vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery, RGS) and the specific contribution of either techniques to the detection of the sN, (2) to determine the accuracy and usefulness of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sN in order to perform a one-stage surgical procedure, and (3) to define how the sN might modulate the therapeutic planning in different stages of disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 1997 to June 2001, 334 patients with early-stage (T(1-2) N(0) M(0)) invasive mammary carcinoma underwent sN biopsy; the average age of patients was 61.5 years (range, 39-75 years). In a subset of 153 patients, both vital blue dye (Patent Blue-V) lymphatic mapping and RGS were used to identify the sN, and the relative contribution of each of the two techniques was assessed.

RESULTS

In the whole group, the sN was identified in 326 of 334 patients (97.6%), and 105 of 326 patients (37.3%) had positive axillary lymph nodes (pN+). In 9 of 105 pN+ patients, the definitive histologic examination of the sN did not show metastases but these were detected in non-sN, thus giving an 8.6% false-negative rate, a negative predictive value of 94.5% (156/165), and an accuracy of 96.5% (252/261). As regards the specific contribution of the two different techniques used in the identification of the sN, the detection rate was 73.8% (113/153) with Patent Blue-V alone, 94.1% (144/153) with RGS alone, and 98.7% (151/153) with Patent Blue-V combined with RGS (P < 0.001). Noteworthy, whenever the sN was identified, the prediction of axillary lymph node status was remarkably similar (93-95% sensitivity; 100% specificity; 95-97% negative predictive value, and 97-98% accuracy) whichever of the three procedures was adopted (Patent Blue-V alone, RGS alone, or combined Patent Blue-V and RGS). Intraoperative frozen section examination was performed in 261 patients, who had at least one sN identified, out of 267 patients who underwent complete axillary dissection; 170 patients had histologically negative sN (i.o. sN-) and 91 patients histologically positive sN (i.o. sN+). All 91 i.o. sN+ were confirmed by definitive histology, whereas in 14 of 170 i.o. sN- patients (8.2%) metastases were detected at definitive histology. As regards the correlation between the size of sN metastasis, the primary tumour size, and the status of non-sN in the axilla, micrometastases were detected at final histology in 23 patients and macrometastases in 82 patients. When only micrometastases were detected, the sN was the exclusive site of nodal metastasis in 20 of 23 patients (86.9%) while in 3 patients with tumour size larger than 10 mm micrometastases were detected also in non-sN. Macrometastases were never detected in pT(1a) breast cancer patients; the sN was the exclusive site of these metastases in 30 patients (36.6%), while in 52 patients (63.4%) there were metastases both in sN and non-sN.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymphadenectomy can better be accomplished when both procedures (lymphatic mapping with vital blue dye and RGS) are used, because of the significantly higher sN detection rate, although the prediction of axillary lymph node status remains remarkably similar whichever method is used. The intraoperative frozen section examination proved to be rather accurate in predicting the actual pathologic status of the sN, with a negative predictive value of 91.8%; in 35% of patients it allowed sN biopsy and axillary dissection to be performed in a one-stage surgical procedure. Finally, specific clinical and histopathologic features of the primary tumour and sN might be used to tailor the loco-regional and systemic treatment in different clinical settings, such as in ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), early-stage invasive breast cancer, and patients with large breast cancer undergoing neo-adjuvant CT for breast-saving surgery as well as elderly patients with operable breast cancer.

Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine the degree with which mammographic features predict the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant mammographic microcalcification lesions without a mass.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mammographic features were correlated with pathologic features in 304 consecutive breast carcinomas manifested by mammographic calcifications only in a prospective evaluation.

RESULTS

Mammographic calcifications associated with breast carcinoma had the final pathologic diagnoses of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 65% of patients, DCIS with a focus of invasion in 32%, and invasive carcinoma only in 4%. Invasive foci were more likely associated with mammographic calcification size of 11 mm and greater (40%, 77/194) compared with 1-10 mm (26%, 29/110; p = 0.019). Invasive foci were also more likely associated with linear calcifications (44%, 55/126) compared with granular calcifications (29%, 51/178; p = 0.007). The frequency of invasion did not increase with calcification extents greater than 10 mm. The frequency of invasion ranged from 22% for less than or equal to 5-mm granular calcifications to 45% for linear calcifications of 11 mm and greater. Only 11% of cancers characterized by fine granular calcifications were associated with invasion as compared with 32% of those with coarse and mixed granular calcifications (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Mammographic calcification features of malignant lesions cannot predict the absence of invasion with greater than 90% predictive value or predict the presence of invasion with greater than 45% predictive value. Increased extent of calcifications greater than 10 mm was not associated with greater likelihood of invasion.

Cytokeratin staining and other sentinel node controversies

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer staging has been widely accepted because it is more sensitive and less morbid than axillary dissection. Sentinel nodes can be thoroughly scrutinized using a variety of techniques increasing the detection of micrometastases; however, the clinical relevance of micrometastases has been challenged. The available data suggest that the prognostic significance of axillary metastases is related to the size of the metastases, and the best data suggest that outcome for patients with metastases < 0.2 mm is similar to patients with node-negative disease. This would argue against the use of ultrasensitive tests such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry upstages 2%-20% of hematoxylin and eosin-negative sentinel nodes, and additional nodal metastases are identified in approximately 10% of completion axillary dissections prompted by an immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive sentinel node. This would appear to be a good reason to perform IHC and act on the results. Because micrometastases can be artifactual, SLN biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ can lead to harmful overtreatment and is best performed in the context of clinical trials. Lymphoscintigraphy has allowed the detection of alternate drainage patterns to internal mammary, infraclavicular, and supraclavicular lymph nodes. Although patients are occasionally identified who have metastases to these basins but not the axilla, this information will not impact the decision for chemotherapy in most cases. Internal mammary SLN biopsy may have value in patients with tumors < 1 cm, but requires additional evaluation in clinical trials.

Do not contemplate invasive surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

Ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS), by definition, has no metastatic potential. The routine examination of axillary lymph nodes in these patients may expose them to unnecessary operative morbidity and is the subject of continuing controversy. This study evaluates the lymph node status of patients with DCIS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all tumor registry patients diagnosed with DCIS between January 1996 and December 2000 was performed. Data obtained included (1) patient demographics, (2) the surgical procedure performed, (3) the histologic grade of the tumor, and (4) the lymph node status, if obtained. All analysis was by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain only.

RESULTS

In all, 380 patients were diagnosed with DCIS. Surgical therapy for these patients varied from lumpectomy (with negative margins) to modified radical mastectomy. Ninety-seven (25.5%) had their axillary lymph nodes (average 9, range 1 to 33) analyzed by H&E stain and are the subject of this study. One patient (1%) was found to have a lymph node micrometastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that axillary lymph node examination is a low-yield endeavor for patients diagnosed with DCIS, regardless of the histologic grade of the tumor. Routine sampling of lymph nodes in these patients is not warranted.

Progesterone receptor status and tumor size as possible indicators of axillary lymph node involvement in T1 carcinoma of the breast

Disagreement persists on the necessity of axillary lymph node dissection for small T1 stage unilateral breast cancers. In this study of 120 women with T1 primary tumors who underwent extensive dissection, better definition of pathological factors that can predict axillary node metastases might have spared 88 (73.3%) who were node negative. We assessed age, tumor size, histology, grade and hormone receptor status as possible indicators of lymph node involvement. As expected, tumor size was a strong predictor of the likelihood of node involvement (p = 0.026 in univariate and p = 0.0024 in multivariate analyses). Progesterone receptor status also correlated significantly (p = 0.0008 in univariate and p = 0.017 in multivariate analyses) with axillary positivity. Tumor grade was found to be significant (p 0.018) only in univariate analysis. These findings contribute to the ongoing search for confident selection of subgroups of patients who will undergo lumpectomy but can safely be spared axillary node dissection.

Learning curves for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping based on surgical volume analysis

BACKGROUND

Implementation of new procedures, including lymphatic mapping for breast cancer, must be done and overseen by the medical community in a responsible way to ensure that the procedures are performed correctly. This study addresses the issues of adequacy of training and certification of surgeons performing lymphatic mapping. Ensuring quality in surgical care requires outcomes measures that are described in this study.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixteen surgeons performed lymphatic mapping in 2,255 patients with breast cancer using a combination blue dye and Tc99m-labeled sulfur colloid to identify the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). All participants were trained in a 2-day CME-accredited course. The Cox learning curve model (total number of mapping failures/total number of mapping cases) for a consecutive series of lymphatic mapping cases is described. The relationship of the Surgical Volume Index, the cases performed in a 30-day period, to the failure rate for each surgeon was modeled as a logistic regression curve (y = e(a+bx)/[1 + e(a+bx)]).

RESULTS

Surgeons performing less than three SLN biopsies per month had an average success rate of 86.23% +/- 8.30%. Surgeons performing three to six SLN biopsies per month had a success rate of 88.73% +/- 6.36%. Surgeons performing more than six SLN biopsies per month had a success rate of 97.81% +/- 0.44%.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience defines a learning curve for lymphatic mapping in breast cancer patients. Data suggest that increased volumes lead to decreased failure rates. These data provide surgeons performing SLN biopsy with a new paradigm for assessing their skill and adequacy of training and describes the relationship between volume of cases performed and success rate of SLN detection.

Aggressive local treatment for screen-detected DCIS results in very low rates of recurrence

AIMS

To review our institution's practice of treatment of a mammographically detected population of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients and to determine the outcome.

METHODS

Between April 1989 and March 1994, 304 women with median age 59 years (range 51-65) with DCIS detected on screening mammogram, were treated in the Newcastle General and Royal Victoria Infirmary Hospitals, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. More than half of the women (n=176, 57.8%) decided to have mastectomy. Other treatment options were wide local excision (WLE) with radiotherapy (n=97, 32%) and WLE alone (n=31, 10.2%). All except five received adjuvant hormone treatment.

RESULTS

Predominant DCIS was comedo in 122 (42%), followed by cribriform in 87 (30%) and micropapillary in 44 (15%) cases. Grade I was found to be commonest grade (54%) followed by grade II (27%) and grade III (11%). With a median follow-up of 88 months, there were six (2%) recurrences, all of which were in women who were given breast conservation treatment, WLE with radiotherapy (n=1, 1%) and without radiotherapy (n=5, 16.6%). Mastectomy in this series was not associated with any recurrence at all. In three cases the recurrence was invasive, one of who also had distant metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that in women with DCIS suitable for breast conservation, WLE when combined with radiotherapy is associated with a very low recurrence rate.

Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of biopsy device, probe size, mammographic lesion type, lesion size, and number of samples obtained per lesion on the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) underestimation rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nonpalpable breast lesions at 16 institutions received a histologic diagnosis of DCIS after 14-gauge automated large-core biopsy in 373 lesions and after 14- or 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy in 953 lesions. The presence of histopathologic invasive carcinoma was noted at subsequent surgical biopsy.

RESULTS

By performing the chi(2) test, independent significant DCIS underestimation rates by biopsy device were 20.4% (76 of 373) of lesions diagnosed at large-core biopsy and 11.2% (107 of 953) of lesions diagnosed at vacuum-assisted biopsy (P <.001); by lesion type, 24.3% (35 of 144) of masses and 12.5% (148 of 1,182) of microcalcifications (P <.001); and by number of specimens per lesion, 17.5% (88 of 502) with 10 or fewer specimens and 11.5% (92 of 799) with greater than 10 (P <.02). DCIS underestimations increased with lesion size.

CONCLUSION

DCIS underestimations were 1.9 times more frequent with masses than with calcifications, 1.8 times more frequent with large-core biopsy than with vacuum-assisted biopsy, and 1.5 times more frequent with 10 or fewer specimens per lesion than with more than 10 specimens per lesion.