Radiotherapy and hyperthermia. Analysis of clinical results and identification of prognostic variables

ESHO 1-85. Hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma. A randomized multicenter study by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology

BACKGROUND

The ESHO protocol 1-85 is a multicenter randomized trial initiated by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology with the aim to investigate the value of hyperthermia (HT) as an adjuvant to radiotherapy (RT) in treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma. The trial is one of the largest studies of hyperthermia in radiotherapy but has not been previously published.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1987 and November 1993, 155 tumors in 151 patients were included. Tumors were stratified according to institution and size (T2-3/T4) and randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (2 Gy/fx, 5 fx/wk) to a total dose of 65-70 Gy, incl. boost, or the same radiotherapy followed once weekly by hyperthermia (aimed for 43 °C for 60 min). Radiation was given with high voltage photons or electrons. The primary endpoint was persistent complete response (local control) in the treated area.

RESULTS

A total of 146 tumors in 142 patients were evaluable, with a median observation time of 19 (range 1-134) months. Seventy tumors were randomized to RT alone and 76 to RT + HT. Size was T4 in 92, and T2-3 in 54 tumors, respectively. The compliance to RT was good with all but 4 patients fulfilling the planned RT treatment. The tolerance to HT was fair, but associated with moderate to severe pain and discomfort in 15 % of the treatments. In 84 % of the heated patients a least one heat treatment achieved the target temperature, but the temperature variation was large. Addition of heat did not significantly increase the acute nor late radiation reactions. Overall, the 5-year actuarial local failure rate was 57 %. Univariate analysis showed a significant influence of hyperthermia (RT alone 68 % versus RT + HT 50 %, p = 0.04, and T-size (T4 75 % versus T2-3 36 %, p < 0.01). A Cox multivariate analysis showed the same factors to be the only significant prognostic parameters: hyperthermia (HR: 0.61 [0.38-0.98], and small tumor strata (HR: 0.46 [0.26-0.92]. Consequentially, more patients given RT + HT (36 %) survived without disease (DFS), than after RT alone (19 %), p = 0.021) CONCLUSION: A randomized multicenter trial investigating the addition of a weekly hyperthermia treatment to radiotherapy of patients with locally advanced breast cancer significantly enhanced the 5-year tumor control and yielded more patients surviving free from cancer. The results substantiate the potential clinical benefit of hyperthermic oncology.

Avoiding Pitfalls in Thermal Dose Effect Relationship Studies: A Review and Guide Forward

The challenge to explain the diffuse and unconclusive message reported by hyperthermia studies investigating the thermal dose parameter is still to be unravelled. In the present review, we investigated a wide range of technical and clinical parameters characterising hyperthermia treatment to better understand and improve the probability of detecting a thermal dose effect relationship in clinical studies. We performed a systematic literature review to obtain hyperthermia clinical studies investigating the associations of temperature and thermal dose parameters with treatment outcome or acute toxicity. Different hyperthermia characteristics were retrieved, and their influence on temperature and thermal dose parameters was assessed. In the literature, we found forty-eight articles investigating thermal dose effect relationships. These comprised a total of 4107 patients with different tumour pathologies. The association between thermal dose and treatment outcome was the investigated endpoint in 90% of the articles, while the correlation between thermal dose and toxicity was investigated in 50% of the articles. Significant associations between temperature-related parameters and treatment outcome were reported in 63% of the studies, while those between temperature-related parameters and toxicity were reported in 15% of the studies. One clear difficulty for advancement is that studies often omitted fundamental information regarding the clinical treatment, and among the different characteristics investigated, thermometry details were seldom and divergently reported. To overcome this, we propose a clear definition of the terms and characteristics that should be reported in clinical hyperthermia treatments. A consistent report of data will allow their use to further continue the quest for thermal dose effect relationships.

Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review

The therapeutic application of heat is very effective in cancer treatment. Both hyperthermia, i.e., heating to 39-45 °C to induce sensitization to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and thermal ablation, where temperatures beyond 50 °C destroy tumor cells directly are frequently applied in the clinic. Achievement of an effective treatment requires high quality heating equipment, precise thermal dosimetry, and adequate quality assurance. Several types of devices, antennas and heating or power delivery systems have been proposed and developed in recent decades. These vary considerably in technique, heating depth, ability to focus, and in the size of the heating focus. Clinically used heating techniques involve electromagnetic and ultrasonic heating, hyperthermic perfusion and conductive heating. Depending on clinical objectives and available technology, thermal therapies can be subdivided into three broad categories: local, locoregional, or whole body heating. Clinically used local heating techniques include interstitial hyperthermia and ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), scanned focused ultrasound (SFUS), electroporation, nanoparticle heating, intraluminal heating and superficial heating. Locoregional heating techniques include phased array systems, capacitive systems and isolated perfusion. Whole body techniques focus on prevention of heat loss supplemented with energy deposition in the body, e.g., by infrared radiation. This review presents an overview of clinical hyperthermia and ablation devices used for local, locoregional, and whole body therapy. Proven and experimental clinical applications of thermal ablation and hyperthermia are listed. Methods for temperature measurement and the role of treatment planning to control treatments are discussed briefly, as well as future perspectives for heating technology for the treatment of tumors.

Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses

Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic ¹²C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.

Hyperthermia with radiotherapy reduces tumour alpha/beta: Insights from trials of thermoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia inhibits the repair of irradiation-induced DNA damage and thereby could alter the α/β values of tumours. This study estimates the clinical α/β_HTRT values from clinical trials of thermoradiotherapy (HTRT) vs radiotherapy (RT) in recurrent breast (RcBC), head and neck (III/IV) (LAHNC) and cervix cancers (IIB-IVA) (LACC).

METHODS

Three recently published meta-analyses for HTRT vs RT in RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were evaluated for complete response (CR). Studies with specified RT dose (D), dose/fraction (d) and corresponding CRs were selected. Tumour biological effective dose (BED) for each study with RT (BED_RT) was computed assuming an α/β_RT of 10 Gy. As outcomes were favourable with HTRT, thermoradiobiological BED (BED_HTRT) was calculated as a product of BED_RT and %CR_HTRT/%CR_RT. The α/β_HTRT was estimated as Dd/(BED_HTRT - D).

RESULTS

12 trials with 864 patients were shortlisted - RcBC (3 studies, n = 259), LAHNC (5 studies, n = 338) and LACC (4 studies, n = 267). Overall risk difference of 0.28 favoured HTRT (p < 0.001). Mean BED_RT and BED_HTRT were 64.7 Gy (SD: ±15.5) and 109.5 Gy (SD: ±32.1) respectively and global α/β_HTRT was 2.25 Gy (SD: ±0.79). Mean α/β_HTRT for RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were 2.05 Gy, 1.74 Gy and 3.03 Gy respectively. On meta-regression, α/β_HTRT was the sole predictor for the corresponding risk differences of the studies (coefficient = -0.096; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Thermoradiobiological effects on the repair of RT induced DNA damage results in reduction in α/β values of tumours. This should be considered to effectively optimize HTRT dose-fractionation schedules in the clinic.

Radio-Hyperthermia in Post-Surgical Recurrence of Melanoma

Aims and background

Malignant melanoma is one of the most radioresistant tumors. It can be treated with combinated hyperthermia and radiation therapy.

Methods

From January 1991 through June 1992, 7 patients, 1 male and 6 female, aged 40-88 years (mean 75), with skin and nodal postsurgical recurrences of melanoma, were treated with a combination of radiation therapy and hyperthermia. Two patients presented systemic disease when they reached our observation, but all of them were without symptoms. None of them underwent surgical excision of the recurrence before or during thermoradiotherapy. None received chemotherapy for these recurrences or had received radiotherapy in the past. They were irradiated with electron beams, with electron energies selected according to the depth of the lesions. The total dose was 40 Gy in 10 fractions in 5 weeks. Hyperthermia was administered for 10 minutes to 1 hour after irradiation. An inductive method of radiofrequency heating at 434 of 915 MHz was used depending on the depth of the lesions. In all of these treatments a ionized water bolus was used. The prescribed hyperthermic dose was 42 °C for half a hour. The treatments were carried out twice a week for 5 weeks. A fiberoptic multichannel thermometer was used for thermometry.

Results

Four patients (57 %) achieved a complete response, 2 patients (29 %) a partial response, and 1 patient (14 %) stabilization. We found no correlation between tumor volume and response rate. Site effects and complications of the treatment were minimal (moderate erythema).

Conclusions

Our results are in the wide range of values reported in the literature.

Evaluating Radiation in Combination with Hyperthermia Trials: The Importance of Clinical and Technical Parameters

A proper evaluation of hyperthermia and irradiation trials Is necessary to correctly interpret clinical results and to define limitations and properties of this new therapeutic approach. A better understanding of the « weight » of different technologic and clinical parameters that influence clinical response is thus clearly needed, particularly if future advances in hyperthermia technology and clinical results are to be expected. Patient variables, tumor variables, and treatment characteristics have been analyzed, and the difficulties of properly evaluating the « weight » of single parameters have been stressed. At the current state of knowledge, the Karnofsky index, site of disease (for regional heating), tumor status (recurrent versus metastatic disease) and XRT dose per fraction (for melanomas) seem to correlate with response. Tumor dimension, XRT total dose and thermal parameters reflecting the lowest tumor temperatures appear to statistically influence complete response rates of heated and irradiated tumors. In addition, a critical method of presenting results should be followed to enable comparison of data from different trials.

Hyperthermia and radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcome of controlled clinical trials in head and neck cancers (HNCs) using hyperthermia and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 498 abstracts were screened from four databases and hand searched as per the PRISMA guidelines. Only two-arm studies treating HNCs with either radiotherapy alone, or hyperthermia and radiotherapy without concurrent chemotherapy or surgery were considered. The evaluated end point was complete response (CR).

RESULTS

Following a detailed screening of the titles, abstracts and full text papers, six articles fulfilling the above eligibility criteria were considered. In total 451 clinical cases from six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Five of six trials were randomised. The overall CR with radiotherapy alone was 39.6% (92/232) and varied between 31.3% and 46.9% across the six trials. With thermoradiotherapy, the overall CR reported was 62.5% (137/219), (range 33.9-83.3%). The odds ratio was 2.92 (95% CI: 1.58-5.42, p = 0.001); the risk ratio was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.32-1.97, p < 0.0001) and the risk difference was 0.25 (95% CI: 0.12-0.39, p < 0.0001), all in favour of combined treatment with hyperthermia and radiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Acute and late grade III/IV toxicities were reported to be similar in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia along with radiotherapy enhances the likelihood of CR in HNCs by around 25% compared to radiotherapy alone with no significant additional acute and late morbidities. This level I evidence should justify the integration of hyperthermia into the multimodality therapy of HNCs.

A heterogeneous dose distribution in simultaneous integrated boost: the role of the clonogenic cell density on the tumor control probability

IMRT with inverse planning allows simultaneous integrated boost strategies that exploit the heterogeneous dose distribution within the planning target volumes (PTVs). In this scenario, the location of cold spots within the target becomes a crucial issue and has to be related to the distribution of the clonogenic cell density (CCD). The main aim of this work is to provide the means to calculate the optimal prescription dose in a relative inhomogeneous dose distribution. To achieve this, the prescription dose has to be assigned to obtain the same tumor control probability (TCP) as the ideal homogeneous distribution, taking into account different CCDs in different PTVs (i.e. visible and subclinical regions). An adapted formulation of the linear-quadratic model, within the F-factor formalism, has been derived to preserve a chosen TCP value for the whole target volume. The F-factor has been investigated to show its potential applications in clinical practice.

Effect of local hyperthermia on metastases in oral squamous cell carcinoma

In this experimental study, hamsters with oral squamous cell carcinoma (O-1N), which has a high potential for lymph node metastasis, received treatment with local hyperthermia. The effect of hyperthermia on regional lymph node metastases was examined pathologically. O-1N was heated twice, each session consisting of radiofrequency capacitive heating (13.56 MHz) for 40 min at 43 degrees C. Cervical lymph nodes were excised 14, 17, 21, and 28 days after heating and were examined histologically. Hamsters in the sham and control groups were killed on the same days and specimens were examined in a same manner. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was significantly lower in the hyperthermia group (36.4%) than in the sham (68.5%) and control (65.0%) groups (both P=0.02). The patterns of lymph node metastasis in the sham and control groups were more advanced than that in the hyperthermia group. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was very low (7.7%) in hamsters with no evidence of tumour after hyperthermia. On multivariate analysis, hyperthermia correlated with inhibition of cervical lymph node metastasis (P=0.02). Our findings suggest that local hyperthermia inhibits lymph node metastasis when the primary tumour responds histologically to treatment.

Transpupillary thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma

The management of choroidal melanomas depends on many factors, most importantly, tumor size and location. Small choroidal melanoma in the posterior fundus is amenable to treatment options such as enucleation, radiotherapy, laser photocoagulation, and transpupillary thermotherapy or a combination of these methods. Transpupillary thermotherapy is a technique of tumor heating by infrared radiation delivered through the pupil into the tumor. This method causes dramatic tumor necrosis in choroidal melanomas up to 4 mm in thickness. With properly selected small choroidal melanomas, tumor control is approximately 94%. The heat induces cellular damage at the site of treatment with few remote side effects; therefore, complications are generally limited to the site of treatment and include retinal vascular obstruction (23%), retinal traction (20%), retinal neovascularization (6%), and retinal hole with detachment (< 1%). Tumors located temporal to the foveola demonstrate a statistically higher risk for retinal traction than those located in other quadrants. Tumors near the optic disk demonstrate a higher incidence of retinal neovascularization due to heat-induced obstruction of a major retinal vascular arcade. Overall, vision preservation is satisfactory after thermotherapy for choroidal melanoma, with more than 50% of patients maintaining the same or better vision after treatment, depending primarily on tumor location. In summary, small choroidal melanomas can be controlled with transpupillary thermotherapy, especially those near the optic disk and foveola in areas that are otherwise difficult to irradiate. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess for local recurrence and the impact of treatment on life prognosis.

Superficial hyperthermia and irradiation for recurrent breast carcinoma of the chest wall: prognostic factors in 196 tumors

PURPOSE

To correlate patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors with subsequent local tumor control.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1977 to 1990, 196 subcutaneous/superficial lesions (179 measurable, 17 microscopic) in 151 patients with recurrent breast carcinoma of the chest wall were treated with superficial 915-MHz microwave hyperthermia and irradiation. The definition of min t43 > or = 10 min is that all monitored tumor catheters had a minimum of 1 hyperthermia session with temperatures > 43 degrees C for at least 10 min.

RESULTS

Factors correlating with local control on univariate analysis included length of survival (> or = 1 year vs. < 1 year) (p < 0.0001), specific absorption rate (SAR) (> or = 25% vs. < 25%) (p = 0.0001), minimum t43 > 10 min (p < 0.0001), tumor volume (p < 0.0001), tumor surface area (p < 0.0001), tumor depth (p = 0.0002), number of hyperthermia sessions (p = 0.0003), and current radiation dose (p = 0.0012). On multivariate analysis, the factors best correlated with ultimate local control were SAR (p < 0.001) and number of hyperthermia sessions (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Multivariate analysis supports the importance of adequate specific absorption rate (SAR) coverage as a better predictor of local control than tumor volume, surface area, or depth. The explanation is that SAR can be correlated with the tumor surface area and depth, depending on the hyperthermia applicator characteristics. It is recommended that future clinical trials stratify study lesions into either SAR > or = 25% or < 25% because this can be readily estimated prior to initiating treatment. It is also recommended that future clinical trials attempt to have adequate lengths of follow-up after therapy to assess the results in long-term survivors.

Relationship between thermal dose and outcome in thermoradiotherapy treatments for superficial recurrences of breast cancer: data from a phase III trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine whether the thermal dose delivered during hyperthermia treatments and other thermal factors correlate with outcome after combined radiation and hyperthermia of breast carcinoma recurrences. Data were from the combined hyperthermia and radiation treatment arms of four Phase III trials, which when pooled together, demonstrated a positive effect of hyperthermia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four Phase III trials addressing the question of whether hyperthermia could improve the local response of superficial recurrent breast cancer to radiation therapy were combined into a single analysis. Thermal dosimetry data were collected from 120 of the 148 breast cancer recurrence patients who received hyperthermia. The data were analyzed for correlations between thermal parameters as well as important clinical parameters and outcome (complete response rate, local disease free survival, time to local failure, and overall survival).

RESULTS

Five thermal parameters were tested, all associated with the low regions of the measured temperature distributions. Max(TDmin) and Sum(TDmin) were associated with complete response where TDmin is the minimum thermal dose measured by any of the tumor temperature sensors during a treatment: Max(TDmin) is the maximum of TDmin over a series of treatments. Using a categorical relationship with a cutoff of 10 min for Sum(TDmin), the complete response rate was 77% for Sum(TDmin) > 10 min and 43% for Sum(TDmin) < or = 10 min (p = 0.022, adjusted for study center and significant clinical factors). The overall complete response rate for hyperthermia and radiation was 61% compared to 41% for radiation alone. Either Max(TDmin) or Sum(TDmin) were also associated with local disease free survival, time to local failure and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

An earlier report of this trial demonstrated a significant benefit when hyperthermia was added to radiation in the treatment of breast cancer recurrences. The analysis of thermal factors demonstrates that parameters representative of the low end of the measured temperature distributions are associated with initial complete response rate, local disease-free survival, time to local failure and overall survival.

Radiofrequency capacitive hyperthermia for unresectable hepatic cancers

Radiofrequency capacitive hyperthermia combined with intra-arterial chemotherapy or chemoembolization was performed in 45 patients with unresectable hepatic cancer. Intratumor temperature was measured in 26 (57.8%) of the 45 patients. The overall mean maximum core temperature (Tmax) was 41.3 +/- 0.3 degrees C (mean +/- SE), and the Tmax was > or = 42 degrees C in nine tumors (34.6%). The tumor temperature rise was related to the power applied, embolization with degradable starch microspheres, and obstruction of the portal vein. The overall response rate was 31.1% (14/45). The response rate was 55.6% when Tmax was > or = 42 degrees C; although this was higher than the response rate of 11.8% achieved with Tmax < 42 degrees C, the difference was not significant. There were no serious adverse effects of hyperthermia.

Transpupillary thermotherapy in the management of choroidal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Several methods of treatment have been used for choroidal melanoma. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the effectiveness of transpupillary thermotherapy using near-infrared radiation to treat choroidal melanoma.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the clinical features, treatment results, and complications of patients with choroidal melanoma who were treated with transpupillary thermotherapy delivered over one to four sessions and followed for at least a 6-month period. All treated tumors had either documentation of growth or ophthalmoscopic risk factors for future growth and/or metastasis.

RESULTS

There were 17 patients with choroidal melanoma treated with transpupillary thermotherapy. The mean tumor size before treatment was 6.6 mm in base and 3.0 mm in thickness. The tumor margin was a mean of 2.3 mm from the optic disc and 2.7 mm from the foveola. Seven tumors (41%) touched the optic disc margin and three (18%) were under the fovea. The tumor responded to treatment in all patients, with a decrease in thickness and resolution of associated subretinal fluid. At a minimum of 6 months of follow-up, the mean tumor thickness was 1.7 mm, and the tumor site was a residual chorioretinal scar with partial visibility of the sclera in all patients. Despite the proximity to the optic disc and foveola, the final visual acuity was the same or improved in ten eyes (59%) and decreased in seven (41%). The improved vision was due to resolution of subfoveal fluid, whereas the decreased vision was primarily the result of treatment in the fovea with ultimate retinal vascular occlusion or preretinal traction. Although long-term follow-up is not yet available, there were no patients with tumor recurrence or tumor metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates that transpupillary the thermotherapy appears to be an effective treatment for selected small choroidal melanomas and may be a particularly useful modality for treating those tumors near the foveola and optic disc. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess for local recurrence and the impact of treatment on survival.

Biological rationale and clinical experience with hyperthermia

Hyperthermia (HT) as an adjunct to radiation therapy (RT) has been a focus of interest in cancer management in recent years there have been numerous randomized and nonrandomized studies conducted to assess the efficacy of HT combined with either RT or chemotherapy especially in the treatment of superficially seated malignant tumors. The major impact of HT is currently on locoregional control of tumor. Heat may be directly cytotoxic to tumor cells or inhibit repair of both sublethal and potentially lethal damage after radiation. These effects are augmented by the physiological conditions in tumor that lead to states of acidosis and hypoxia. Blood flow is often impaired in tumor relative to normal tissues, and HT may lead to a further decrease in blood flow and augment heat sensitivity. Three major areas of clinical investigation have borne the greatest fruit for HT as adjunctive therapy to RT. These include recurrent and primary breast lesions, melanoma, and head and neck neoplasms. Thermal enhancement ratio was increased in all cases and is approximately 1.4 for neck nodes, 1.5 for breast, and 2 for malignant melanoma. In general, the most important prognostic factors for complete response (CR) are RT dose, tumor size and minimal thermal parameters minimal thermal dose (t43min), mean minimal temperature (Tmin) or T90, i.e., temperature exceeded by 90% of thermal sensors]. The number of HT fractions administered per week appears to have no bearing on the overall response, which may be indicative of the effects of thermotolerance. The total number of HT fractions delivered also appears irrelevant provided adequate HT is delivered in one or two sessions. The major prognostic factors for the duration of local control were tumor histology, concurrent RT dose, tumor depth and Tmin. Although numerous single institution studies showed increased CR rates and improved local control, the efficacy of HT as an adjunct to RT should be assessed with well-designed multi-institutional randomized clinical trials. Such clinical trials are underway.

Low-frequency magnetic fields and cancer. What you should know and what to tell your patients

Although the available scientific data that low-frequency magnetic fields play a role in the etiology of cancer are inconclusive, this link has been suggested by epidemiologic data and proliferated in the nonscientific literature. Electric power lines, cellular phones, and personal computers are examples of sources that have been blamed for medical problems, particularly cancer. Since exposure to low-frequency magnetic fields is universal and practically unavoidable, what can physicians advise their patients? In light of the controversy surrounding this issue, the best advice may be to minimize such exposure. Future research on the health implications of low-frequency magnetic fields appears to be warranted.

Radiation plus local hyperthermia versus radiation plus the combination of local and whole-body hyperthermia in canine sarcomas

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of increasing intratumoral temperatures by the combination of local hyperthermia (LH) and whole body hyperthermia (WBH) on the radiation response of canine sarcomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Dogs with spontaneous soft tissue sarcomas and no evidence of metastasis were randomized to be treated with radiation combined with either LH alone or LH + WBH. Dogs were accessioned for treatment at two institutions. The radiation dose was 56.25 Gy, given in 25 2.25 Gy daily fractions. Two hyperthermia treatments were given; one during the first and one during the last week of treatment. Dogs were evaluated after treatment for local recurrence, metastasis, and complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-four dogs were treated between 1989 and 1993. The use of LH+WBH resulted in statistically significant increases in the low and middle regions of the temperature distributions. The largest increase was in the low temperatures with median CEM 43 T90 values of 4 vs. 49 min for LH vs. LH + WBH, respectively (p<0.001). There was no difference in duration of local tumor control between hyperthermia groups (p = 0.59). The time to metastasis was shorter for dogs receiving LH + WBH (p = 0.02); the hazard ratio for metastatic disease for dogs in the LH + WBH group was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.4) with respect to dogs in the LH group. Complications were greater in larger tumors and in tumors treated with LH + WBH, CONCLUSION: The combination of LH + WBH with radiation therapy, as described herein, was not associated with an increase in local tumor control in comparison to use of LH with radiation therapy. The combination of LH + WBH also appeared to alter the biology of the metastatic process and was associated with more complications than LH. We identified no rationale for further study of LH + WBH in combination with radiation for treatment of solid tumors.

Hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiation therapy of recurrent or metastatic malignant melanoma. A multicentre randomized trial by the European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology

The ESHO protocol 3-85 is a multicentre randomized trial investigating the value of hyperthermia as an adjuvant to radiotherapy in treatment of malignant melanoma. A total of 134 metastatic of recurrent malignant melanoma lesions in 70 patients were randomized to receive radiotherapy alone (3 fractions in 8 days) or each fraction followed by hyperthermia (aimed for 43 degrees C for 60 min). Radiation was given with high voltage photons or electrons. Tumours were stratified according to institution and size (above or below 4 cm) and randomly assigned to a total radiation dose of either 24 or 27 Gy to be given with or without hyperthermia. The endpoint was persistent complete response in the treated area. A number of 128 tumours in 68 patients were evaluable, with an observation time between 3 and 72 months. Sixty-five tumours were randomized to radiation alone and 63 to radiation + heat. Sixty received 24 Gy and 68 tumours received 27 Gy, respectively. Size was < or = 4 cm in 81 and > 4 cm in 47 tumours. Overall the 2-year actuarial local tumour control was 37%. Univariate analysis showed prognostic influence of hyperthermia (rad alone 28% versus rad + heat 46%, p = 0.008) and radiation dose (24 Gy 25% versus 27 Gy 56%, p = 0.02), but not of tumour size (small 42% versus large 29%, p = 0.21). A Cox multivariate regression analysis showed the most important prognostic parameters to be: hyperthermia (odds ratio: 1.73 (1.07-2.78), p = 0.02), tumour size (odds ratio: 0.91 (0.85-0.99), p = 0.05) and radiation dose (odds ratio: 1.17 (1.01-1.36), p = 0.05). Analysis of the heating quality showed a significant relationship between the extent of heating and local tumour response. Addition of heat did not significantly increase the acute or late radiation reactions. The overall 5-year survival rate of the patients was 19%, but 38% in patients if all known disease was controlled, compared to 8% in the patients with persistent active disease.

Simulation of electromagnetically induced hyperthermia: a finite element gridding method

A finite element gridding method for simulating electromagnetically (EM) induced hyperthermia is presented. The method uses patient CT data as its primary input, with critical structures manually outlined (on a graphics workstation) for explicit demarcation. The paper outlines the various stages involved in mesh creation, including procedures for conforming the finite element representation of critical structures to their smooth boundaries, modelling of heating equipment, and modelling of the outer boundaries. The procedure for generating the finite element model is illustrated for an example treatment. Additionally, the results of computing the SAR in six patients are compared to measured values. The comparison reveals agreement between the model prediction and actual treatment within the limits of measurement error.

Clinical experience using 8 MHz radiofrequency capacitive hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy: results of a phase I/II study

PURPOSE

Since 1985, the University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic has investigated the efficacy and safety of 8 MHz radiofrequency (RF) capacitive hyperthermia using the Thermotron RF-8. This study reports the thermometric and clinical results of 119 patients treated with RF hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of 119 patients, 69 received high-dose RT and 50 patients received low-dose RT because of previous irradiation to the treatment site. The most common anatomic sites treated were within the pelvic cavity or head and neck area. Thirty-three percent and 24% of tumors treated were > 7 cm and > 10 cm in largest diameter, respectively. Forty percent of the patients had deep-seated tumors (depth > 6 cm). Hyperthermia was given as soon as possible after RT twice weekly, allowing at least 72 h between treatments. The objective was to raise intratumoral temperatures to 42-43 degrees C or above for 30-50 min while keeping normal tissue temperatures below 40-41 degrees C.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients, 40% achieved a Tmax tumor temperature of > 42 degrees C and 40% achieved 40-42 degrees C Tmax. Higher Tmax) tumor temperatures were observed as tumor size increased. Tumors > 10 cm in largest diameter had a Tmax of 42.2 degrees C. Tumor depth was not a significant factor for the tumor temperatures achieved. Of 119 patients, 11% achieved complete response and 38% achieved partial response. Of the no-response patients, 34% had symptomatic palliation and 15% had stable disease for at least 12 months after treatment. We were able to treat tumors of patients with subcutaneous fat as thick as 3 cm by precooling the fat for 20 min with 10-15 degrees C saline-filled boluses prior to the initiation of heating. During treatment, 60% of patients complained of varying degrees of pain and 19% had pain that was a factor in limiting treatment. Vital signs were relatively stable and not a factor in limiting treatment.

CONCLUSION

The Thermotron RF-8 is a useful hyperthermia device that can raise tumor temperatures to a therapeutic level (i.e., 42 degrees C) in a significant proportion of patients with superficial, subsurface, and deep-seated tumors, with minimal adverse effects, complications, and systemic stress. Further clinical studies using improved thermometry systems are warranted.

Prognostic factors for tumour response and skin damage to combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia in superficial recurrent breast carcinomas

Prognostic factors for complete tumour response and acute skin damage to combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy were analysed in material of patients with breast cancer, recurrent in previously irradiated areas. Radiotherapy was given daily to a total absorbed dose of 30.0 Gy in 2 weeks or 34.5 Gy in 3 weeks. The first radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat twice weekly, a total of four heat treatments (schedule A). The second radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat either once or twice a week resulting in a total of three (schedule B) or six (schedule C) heat treatments. Heat was induced with microwaves (2450, 915 or 434 MHz) via external applicators and always given after the radiotherapy fraction. The complete response (CR) rate in evaluable patients was 71% (49/69). There was no significant difference in CR rate between the three different hyperthermia schedules. The CR rates were 74% (14/19), 65% (15/23) and 74% (20/27) for schedules A, B and C respectively. The only factor predicting CR, evaluated both uni- and multivariately, was the CRE-value for the present radiotherapy dose (p = 0.02). If only tumours treated with 915 MHz were taken into account, however, then the highest minimum temperature at a given heat session predicted complete response (p = 0.03). This was true also in a multivariate analysis of this subgroup of tumours. A Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank test) showed no significant difference in duration of CR between the different treatment schedules. Cox's proportional hazards method revealed three significant factors: tumour size (negatively correlated, p = 0.007), the time interval between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the present treatment (p = 0.02) and the average temperature (0.03). Maximum acute skin reactions in the treatment field were scored according to an ordinal scale of 0-8, modified after WHO 1979. Twenty-six treatment areas (32%) expressed more severe skin damage (score > or = 5) in terms of desquamation with blisters (14%) and necrosis or ulceration (19%). Factors correlated with skin damage were the size of the lesion area (p = 0.011), the highest average maximum temperature during a given heat session (p = 0.03) and the fractionation schedule of hyperthermia (p = 0.05). The extent of previous radiotherapy absorbed dose, previous surgery in the treated area or previous chemotherapy had no significant influence on the acute skin reactions.

Multiple field hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the breast

Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the breast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and complications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping fields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 2900 cm2 in area with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm deep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia applicator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz microwaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia applicator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a particular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields to a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 and 50 Gy. The equivalent dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hyperthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days. Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tumour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once. Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator fields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treatments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (range of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The tumour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nevertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemic tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermoradiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcinoma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the chest wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork thermoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermia fields.

Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation: a study of carcinogenic and cancer treatment potential

Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIEMR), particularly the magnetic field component, has been implicated in the development of human neoplasia. Research suggests that if these fields are part of the carcinogenic pathway, they may act as a promoter or in the progression of established cancer. Active progression of cancer cells by NIEMR negate the possible early detection of clinically silent neoplasms. We have observed the effect of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on an established breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7, and found no stimulation of growth when exposed to a low-frequency magnetic field. The same magnetic field has been used as an adjuvant to anti-neoplastic chemotherapeutic agents. The results of this study have shown an improvement in the neoplastic cell kill by antineoplastic chemotherapy when coupled with a low frequency magnetic field. Non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation may be involved in the carcinogenic process; however, the answer to this question awaits further studies. We are exploring new methods of cancer treatment using non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation.

The role of radiation therapy in the treatment of head and neck cutaneous melanoma

INTRODUCTION

This study was undertaken to elucidate the efficacy of external beam irradiation in the treatment of head and neck malignant melanoma, in comparison with the efficacy of surgical excision and the efficacy of surgical excision combined with external beam irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients seen at the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center with the diagnosis of head and neck melanoma from 1973 to 1992 was conducted. Using chi 2 analysis, survival rates were examined for patients treated with excision alone, irradiation alone, and both excision and irradiation.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with primary excision (96%), salvage excision for recurrent or residual disease (47%), primary irradiation (9%), post-surgical-planned irradiation (22%), adjuvant chemotherapy (45%), and adjuvant immunotherapy (36%). The overall survival rate for the entire group was 29%. For patients with recurrent or regional disease, survival rates were 37% for those treated with excision in combination with irradiation, 20% for those treated with irradiation alone, and 19% for those treated with excision. Whereas the differences among groups were not statistically significant, the biologic implication is that external beam irradiation is effective in controlling regional disease, since the tumors treated with irradiation alone or excision in combination with irradiation were larger and more aggressive than those treated with excision alone.

CONCLUSION

External beam irradiation is of benefit in treating patients with melanoma who are ineligible for salvage surgery or as an adjunctive modality in situations where the risk of recurrence is high.

Prognostic factors in metastatic malignant melanoma treated with combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia

From May 1981 to September 1991, 38 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were treated with combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia to a total of 97 hyperthermia treatment fields. Prior treatments to these sites included surgery (31 patients, 76 fields), chemotherapy (18 patients, 54 fields), immunotherapy (14 patients, 42 fields) and radiation therapy (7 patients, 13 hyperthermia fields). Hyperthermia was given to fields located in the head and neck region, trunk and extremities in 30, 45 and 22 cases, respectively. Nodular-diffuse tumours were present in 86 fields while 11 fields were treated for microscopic residual tumour deposits. Concurrent radiation therapy was given in 180-400 cGy per fraction, 2-5 times per week for a mean total dose of 4098 cGy per field. Hyperthermia treatments were delivered using either microwave or ultrasound devices (286 and 48 treatments, respectively) with a mean (range) of 3.4 (1-14) hyperthermia treatments per field for a mean (range) of 43 (10-70) min per field. Patients (n = 34; 84 fields) were available for follow-up for a mean (range) of 14.6 (0.4-82.5) months. At 3 weeks post-treatment, 34 fields had complete, ongoing, or partial responses; 39 fields had no response; and there were no recurrences in the 11 fields treated for microscopic residual disease. Local control was maintained in 31% (26/84) fields with a mean follow-up of 14.6 months. At 36 months, five patients remained alive with complete control of their treated local disease. Statistical analyses revealed that patients with soft tissue metastases only, who were older at the time of hyperthermia, had a longer time between initial diagnosis and hyperthermia treatment, received a higher dose of radiation, had no previous chemotherapy, and had small tumour volumes, had a higher initial response. Multivariate analyses revealed that the three-covariate model including time interval between initial diagnosis and hyperthermia treatment, previous chemotherapy, and metastases to soft tissue only, best predicted response. The results of the investigation support the continued study of combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia treatments for selected patients with metastatic melanoma, and indicate that long-term survival can occasionally be obtained with this approach.

Interstitial thermoradiotherapy with ferromagnetic implants for locally advanced and recurrent neoplasms

PURPOSE

The University of Arizona, University of California at San Francisco, City of Hope Medical Center, and University of Wisconsin participated in a Phase I/II protocol to assess the heating ability and the toxicity of interstitial thermoradiotherapy using ferromagnetic implantation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients with advanced primary or recurrent extra-cranial solid malignancies were enrolled in this study. Fourteen gauge catheters were implanted into tumors and, once in the department of Radiation Oncology, loaded with ferromagnetic seeds to deliver a 60 min hyperthermia treatment. Multi-point thermometry was continuously used throughout the heating sessions for all patients, sampling the periphery as well as the core of the tumor. After 192Iridium brachytherapy, 18 patients then had an additional treatment. The mean radiation dose while on protocol was 50.0 Gy, with total doses (including prior radiotherapy) ranging from 20.3-151.8 Gy (median = 88.7 Gy). Response and toxicity were assessed by inspection, palpation, and/or radiologic studies. Forty-one patients were evaluable for response, and there were 55 analyzable hyperthermia treatment sessions.

RESULTS

The complete response rate was 61% (25/41). The partial response rate was 31.7% and only 7.3% failed to respond. Median duration of local control has not yet been reached. The mean maximum, minimum, and mean time-averaged temperatures for all in-tissue sensors were 43.7 degrees C, 38.7 degrees C, and 41.0 degrees C, respectively. Tumor size was the only factor significantly correlated with temperatures or with complete response rate; larger tumors attained higher temperatures but smaller tumors had a higher response probability. Nineteen patients (43%) experienced toxicities, however there was only a 7% (3/44) rate of serious complications (Grade 3 or 4). Prior treatment with hyperthermia was the only factor significantly correlated with serious toxicity.

CONCLUSION

These results, a 93% total response with only 7% serious toxicity, are encouraging especially in the context of the patient population treated. Phase II/III studies involving ferromagnetic implantation are warranted.

Cisplatin, hyperthermia, and radiation (trimodal therapy) in patients with locally advanced head and neck tumors: a phase I-II study

PURPOSE

Hyperthermia is now being widely used to treat clinical malignancies especially combined with radiotherapy and more rarely with chemotherapy. The combination of heat, radiation, and chemotherapy (trimodality) can lead to potent interaction. The present Phase I-II study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and acute toxicity of a combination of cisplatin, hyperthermia, and irradiation in the treatment of superficial cervical nodal metastases from head and neck cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighteen patients with measurable neck metastases from previously untreated squamous cell head and neck tumors were entered into the trial. Therapy consisted of a conventional irradiation (total dose 70 Gy, 2 Gy five times a week) combined with a weekly administration of 20 mg/m2 iv of cisplatin and a total of two sessions of local external microwave hyperthermia (desired temperature of 42.5 degrees C for 30 min).

RESULTS

Feasibility of the treatment was demonstrated. Acute local toxicity was mild; no thermal blisters or ulcerations were reported and only two patients experienced local pain during hyperthermia. Cutaneous toxicity appeared greater than in our previous studies with irradiation plus hyperthermia and irradiation plus cisplatin. Systemic toxicity was moderate with major toxic effects observed in three patients (World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 anaemia). Even though it was not an aim of the study to evaluate the nodal response, we observed a complete response rate of 72.2% (95% confidence interval 51-93.4%), 16.6% of partial response and 11.1% of no change.

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the feasibility of the combination of cisplatin, heat, and radiation with an acceptable toxicity profile. The trimodal therapy deserves further evaluation as a way to enhance the efficacy of irradiation in the treatment of nodal metastases from head and neck tumors.

Thermoradiation therapy for superficial malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

Between 1980-1990, 126 patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) and hyperthermia using 915-MHz external microwave applicators. All but 11 patients had failed to respond to previous therapy.

METHODS

The mean tumor volume was 73 +/- 13 cm3, and the mean radiation dose delivered was 45 +/- 1 Gy. Hyperthermia was administered biweekly in 83% of the fields in 5.5 +/- 0.2 sessions. Lesions were stratified by depth. The predictive influence of pretreatment or treatment parameters was analyzed for the probability of response by logistic regression and for the duration of local control by proportional hazards.

RESULTS

In tumors considered potentially heatable (i.e., < or = 3-cm deep), the complete response (CR) rate was 70%, whereas the CR rate for patients with tumors deeper than 3 cm was 18% (P < 0.0001). Among superficial lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth that exhibited a CR, 14 recurred (26%, 8.7 +/- 1.6 months), while 39 lesions were recurrence-free at last follow-up of 17.8 +/- 1.4 months. The 50% tumor-effective dose was 44 Gy. For superficial lesions that received between 30-60 Gy, the CR rate was 55% when the fraction size was less than 3 Gy, whereas it was 77% when the fraction size was 3-4 Gy (P = 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the model best correlating with CR included concurrent radiation dose (P = 0.006) and tumor volume (P = 0.02; model P = 0.0001). Multivariate proportional hazard analysis indicated that the model best correlating with duration of local control included tumor histology (P = 0.004; model P = 0.0007). The overall survival rate of patients with lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth who were treated with thermoradiation therapy was 16.1 +/- 1.2 months. For patients with lesions more than 3-cm deep, survival was 8.7 +/- 1.1 months (P < 0.001). Forty-two fields were treated without any skin reactions (33%), 59 exhibited erythema (47%), and 25 experienced thermal blistering (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of superficial malignant tumors can benefit from the adjuvant use of hyperthermia delivered with external 915-MHz applicators provided tumors are less than 3 cm from the surface and the lateral margins are within the 50% specific absorption rate (SAR) on the surface.

Prediction of treatment temperatures in clinical hyperthermia of locally advanced breast carcinoma: the use of contrast enhanced computed tomography

PURPOSE

Nineteen patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma were subjected to computed tomography examinations prior to thermoradiotherapy. Pre- and postcontrast computed tomography images were obtained, and tumor contrast enhancement was studied in relation to tissue perfusion, PERF, and steady state temperature, TS, in an attempt to develop an assay for prediction of treatment temperatures in clinical hyperthermia of breast carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PERF and TS were calculated from temperature data achieved during the first fraction of the heat treatment regimen. The computed tomography images were subjected to image analysis, and two parameters representing tumor contrast enhancement were calculated from the computed tomography numbers; the absolute increase in mean attenuation, delta N, and the fraction of the postcontrast attenuation values that was higher than the mean precontrast attenuation value, F+C.

RESULTS

delta N and F+C were clearly correlated to each other. The two parameters differed considerably among the patients, showing that the accumulation of contrast medium was higher in some tumors than in others. Tumor contrast enhancement increased with increasing PERF, suggesting that the accumulation of contrast medium in the tumors was determined mainly by the effective tissue perfusion. There was also a clear correlation between tumor contrast enhancement and TS. The tumors showing a high accumulation of contrast medium were more difficult to heat than those showing a low accumulation.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that contrast enhanced computed tomography images may give information about the treatment temperatures that can be achieved in clinical hyperthermia of breast carcinoma. The computed tomography images may possibly be used to predict those tumors that can be heated to therapeutic temperatures.

Feasibility and toxicity of transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia in the treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

This Phase I trial tests the ability of a new hyperthermia device, the transrectal ultrasound probe, to heat the prostate gland, and evaluates the toxicity of transrectal ultrasound hyperthermia (TRUSH) given with concurrent standard external beam irradiation in the treatment of locally-advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June, 1990 and August, 1991, 14 patients with American Urological Society Stage C2 or D1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with TRUSH concurrently with standard external beam radiotherapy to the prostate. Twenty-two heat treatments were delivered in 14 patients; 8 patients received two TRUSH procedures, each separated by 1 week. Patient age ranged between 53-86 (mean: 72) years. Three patients had well-, 6 patients had moderately-, and 5 patients had poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Karnofsky status ranged from 70-90. Standard radiotherapy to the prostate and periprostatic tissues was delivered using a four-field approach with 1.8-2 Gy daily fractions delivered 5 x/week to a total dose of 67-70 Gy calculated to the minimum tumor volume. TRUSH was delivered after transperineal placement of multipoint thermometry probes by a urologist, under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Two to three thermocouple probes containing seven sensors each were placed in the prostate in an attempt to sample temperatures throughout the gland. The sensor depth from the rectal wall ranged from 5-25 mm.

RESULTS

Thirty-six percent of all sensors were heated above 42.5 degrees C averaged over 30 min; and all patients had at least some sensors within the prostate heated to temperatures > or = 42.5 degrees C. The average temperature of all sensors of all sensors (T(ave) +/- s.d.) over all treatments, however, was only 41.9 degrees C +/- 0.9 degrees C over 30 min. The maximum temperature for normal tissues outside the gland was 41.1 degrees C +/- 1.3 degrees C. Treatments have been well-tolerated with few complications. Tolerance has been "good" in 17/22, "fair" in 3/22, and "treatment limiting" in 2/22 treatments secondary to position intolerance and/or pain. There has been one episode of hypotension related to narcotic administration and three episodes of rapidly resolving pain during hyperthermia treatment. Mild hematuria has occurred in 5/22, and moderate hematuria has occurred in 2/22 transperineal thermometer catheter placements.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, TRUSH is well-tolerated and has great potential for consistently heating the prostate gland. We anticipate that further equipment modifications will improve our ability to heat the entire prostate to temperatures > 42.5 degrees C.

Randomized trial of one versus two adjuvant hyperthermia treatments per week in patients with superficial tumours

One test for thermotolerance development in a clinical situation is to evaluate the effects of altering the hyperthermia fractionation interval on tumour response to thermoradiotherapy. Between 1983 and 1990 44 evaluable advanced superficial tumours of miscellaneous origin in 41 patients were randomized to receive either once-weekly or twice-weekly external microwave hyperthermia treatments combined with radiation therapy. The mean age of patients was 62 years, and 85% had failed previous therapy. All lesions were less than 8 x 8 x 4 cm (L x W x D) and were heated by external 915 MHz microwaves. The mean radiation dose was 44 +/- 3 Gy (mean +/- SE) in the once-weekly group and 46 +/- 3 Gy in the twice-weekly group (p = 0.64). The mean volume of the lesions heated once weekly was 17 +/- 6 versus 23 +/- 5 cm3 for those heated twice weekly (p = 0.45). Hyperthermia was administered once weekly for 4.6 +/- 0.2 sessions (range 3-7) or twice weekly for 8.1 +/- 0.3 sessions (range 4-10). Thermometry was performed using 3.4 +/- 0.2 catheters and 5.1 +/- 0.6 thermal sensors per tumour in the once-weekly group, and 2.7 +/- 0.2 catheters and 5.8 +/- 0.3 thermal sensors per tumour in the twice-weekly group. Of the 44 evaluable randomized lesions a complete response (CR) at 2 months post-treatment was observed in 59% (13/22) heated once weekly and 55% (12/22) in those heated twice weekly. The prognostic factors predictive of tumour complete response were found by logistic regression analysis to be radiation dose and tumour volume, while the prognostic factors predictive of duration of response (Cox proportional hazards analysis) were median minimum tumour temperature (Tmin), minimum tumour temperature during the first heat treatment (Tmin1) and tumour volume. The duration of local control in lesions with Tmin < or = 39.5 degrees C was 11.7 +/- 1.9 months while for lesions with Tmin > 39.5 degrees C it was 23.0 +/- 4.2 months (p = 0.01). The ED50 was calculated by logistic regression to be 40 Gy (95% CI = 22-54 Gy) for once- and twice-weekly heated lesions. There was not a significant difference in tumour response or duration of response between populations randomized to receive once- versus twice-weekly hyperthermia treatments. There was also no difference in skin reaction rates between once- and twice-weekly hyperthermia treatments, nor could a correlation be found between any thermal parameter and skin reactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Sensitivity of hyperthermia trial outcomes to temperature and time: implications for thermal goals of treatment

PURPOSE

In previous work we have found that the cumulative minutes of treatment for which 90% of measured intratumoral temperatures (T90) exceeded 39.5 degrees C was highly associated with complete response of superficial tumors. Similarly, the cumulative time for which 50% of intratumoral temperatures (T50) exceeded 41.5 degrees C was highly associated with the presence of > 80% necrosis in soft tissue sarcomas resected after radiotherapy and hyperthermia. In the present work we have calculated the time for isoeffective treatments with T90 = 43 degrees C and T50 = 43 degrees C, respectively, using published thermal isoeffective dose formulae. The purpose of these calculations was to determine the sensitivity of treatment outcome to variations in thermal isoeffective dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The basis for the calculations were the thermal parameters and treatment outcomes in three patient populations: 44 patients with moderate or high grade soft tissue sarcoma treated preoperatively with hyperthermia and radiation; 105 patients with superficial tumors treated with hyperthermia and radiation, and 59 patients with deep tumors treated with hyperthermia and radiation.

RESULTS

The thermal dose values calculated are strongly associated with outcome in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Simple dose-response equations result from the analysis, and we use these equations to assess the sensitivity of outcome upon variations in thermal dose. This information, in turn, allows us to estimate the number of patients required in Phase II and III trials of hyperthermia and radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For regimens of 5 to 10 hyperthermia treatments, improvements in median T90 (superficial tumors) and T50 (deep tumors) parameters by 1.2-1.5 degrees C could result in response rates high enough (compared to radiotherapy alone) to justify Phase III trials. A similar improvement in response rates would require an increase in overall duration of treatment by a factor of 3 to 5. This would be difficult to achieve while also avoiding thermal tolerance induction. Achieving these temperature goals may be possible with improvements in hyperthermia technology. Alternatively, there may be ways to increase the sensitivity of cells to temperatures that can be achieved currently, such as pH reduction or chemosensitization.

Hyperthermia and radiation in advanced malignant melanoma

Advanced melanoma (48 lesions in 40 patients) was treated with external microwave hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1980-1988. Thirty-three lesions in 28 patients were evaluable for tumor response (mean age 64 years, 19 male, 9 female). Evaluable lesions received 13 to 66 Gy (mean 37 +/- 2 Gy) over 5 to 16 fractions (mean of 10) in 14 to 56 elapsed days (mean of 25). Tumor volume (pi/6*length*width*depth) was 62 +/- 16 cm3 (1-377 cm3). Hyperthermia was administered in 6.6 +/- 0.4 sessions (range 1-14), there were 3.2 +/- 0.4 thermal sensors per tumor (range 1-11) and 27 fields were treated twice-weekly (82%). Of the 33 evaluable lesions, 12 exhibited a complete response (36%), and 17 had a partial response (52%). Among the 12 complete responders four recurrences (33%) were observed at 8.6 +/- 1.4 months (median of 8.2 months). In superficial tumors with depth < or = 3 cm and with lateral dimensions within 2 cm of the boundaries of the microwave applicator, the complete response rate was 50% (11/22); whereas for patients with deeper tumors with depth > 3 cm, the complete response rate was 9% (1/11), p = 0.02. The minimal tumor thermal dose during the first hyperthermia treatment session correlated with response (t43min1 = 20 +/- 7 vs. 6 +/- 3 minEq43 degrees C for complete responders and noncomplete responders, respectively, p = 0.06); and 7 of 10 lesions that had t43min 1 > or = 8 minEq43 degrees C achieved a complete response whereas only 5 of 22 lesions (23%) that had t43min1 < 8 minEq43 degrees C did so (p = 0.01). However, neither the minimum tumor temperature during the first treatment, the median minimum tumor temperature over all treatment sessions nor the sum of minimum thermal dose over all treatment sessions correlated with tumor response. Twenty-three patients with 28 lesions died during follow-up (82%). The survival for complete responding patients with superficial lesions was 21.3 +/- 1.5 months compared to 4.5 +/- 0.5 months for patients with superficial lesions that did not experience a complete response (p = 0.0001). For patients with noncomplete responding lesions deeper than 3 cm survival was 4.4 +/- 0.6 months. Twenty lesions were treated without any skin reaction (42%, 20/48). Of the rest, 23 had erythema (48%, 23/48), seven had blistering (14%, 7/48) and one had ulceration of the skin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Field conjugate acoustic lenses for ultrasound hyperthermia

Multipoint foci have been synthesized by applying the pseudoinverse field conjugation method to a single ultrasonic transducer coupled to a polystyrene lens. The lens design is based on phased array calculations are then fabricated on a computer-controlled milling machine. The measured beam patterns from the lenses agree closely with the beam patterns predicted by theory for the equivalent phased arrays. Temperature distributions from thermal modeling and those measured in tissue equivalent phantoms show that the lens system is capable of generating strongly localized, controlled temperature fields for hyperthermia.

Hyperthermia in cancer growth regulation

With present techniques, hyperthermia used alone can cause complete clinical regression in 10-15% of tumours but the duration of response is very short. The greatest advantage for hyperthermia at the present time appears to be in combination with radiation in the local control of cancer growth. Currently, large randomised phase III studies are in progress to determine whether the addition of local hyperthermia to radiation or chemotherapy yields significant advantage. Phase III studies of wholebody hyperthermia in combination with chemotherapy are planned for the future and will include tumours with a high growth fraction such as small cell lung cancer and high grade non Hodgkins lymphoma.

Combined radiation and hyperthermia: effects of the number of heat fractions and their interval on normal and tumour tissues

The effect of one or more heat treatments at 43 degrees C combined with conventional multifraction irradiation was studied in murine normal and tumoral tissues. The endpoint of this study was the TCD50 of the C3H mammary carcinoma, inoculated into the foot. For normal tissue the reaction of the skin of the foot was assessed according to a graded scoring system. Twenty X-ray fractions delivered in 20 or 26 days were combined with one, four or eight fractions of quasi-simultaneous or sequential hyperthermia (i.e. heat applied 4 h after irradiation). Tumour dose-response curves show a decrease in TCD50 and in increase in TER linked to the increasing number of heat sessions. A qualitatively similar effect of the number of sessions was observed for the different protocols (quasi-simultaneous and sequential) and for the two overall times. No significant difference was measured between one and four HT sessions plus 20 fx of RT in the normal tissue damage, while a slight difference was observed between one, four and eight HT sessions delivered with 20 fractions of RT in 26 days.

Treatment of malignant gliomas with interstitial irradiation and hyperthermia

A Phase I study of interstitial thermoradiotherapy for high-grade supratentorial gliomas has been completed. The objective of this trial was to test the feasibility and toxicity of hyperthermia induced by ferromagnetic implants in the treatment of intracranial tumors. The patient population consisted of 16 males and 12 females, with a median age of 44 years and a median Karnofsky score of 90. Nine patients had anaplastic astrocytoma while 19 had glioblastoma multiforme. Twenty two patients were treated at the time of their initial diagnosis with a course of external beam radiotherapy (median dose 48.4 Gy) followed by an interstitial implant with Ir-192 (median dose 32.7 Gy). Six patients with recurrent tumors received only an interstitial implant (median dose 40 Gy). Median implant volume for all patients was 55.8 cc and median number of treatment catheters implanted per tumor was eighteen. A 60-minute hyperthermia treatment was given through these catheters just before and right after completion of brachytherapy. Time-averaged temperatures of all treatments were computed for sensors located within the core of (> 5 mm from edge of implant), and at the periphery of the implant (outer 5 mm). The percentage of sensors achieving an average temperature > 42 degrees C was 61% and 35%, respectively. Hyperthermia was generally well tolerated; however, there have been 11 minor toxicities, which resolved with conservative management, and one episode of massive edema resulting in the death of a patient. In addition, there were three major complications associated with the surgical implantation of the catheters. Preliminary survival analysis shows that 16 of the 28 patients have died, with a median survival of 20.6 months from diagnosis. We conclude that interstitial hyperthermia of brain tumors with ferromagnetic implants is feasible and carries significant but acceptable morbidity given the extremely poor prognosis of this patient population.

Therapeutic responses of spontaneous canine malignancies to combinations of radiotherapy and hyperthermia

The goals of this ongoing Phase III study of adjuvant local hyperthermia with radiotherapy were to evaluate how tumor control and normal tissue complications were related to patient and treatment variables. Canine veterinary patients with localized malignancies were stratified by histology and anatomic site and randomized into three groups. All patients received radiotherapy (60CO) in 3.5 Gy fractions given Mon-Wed-Fri to 14 treatments (49 Gy). One group received radiotherapy alone while the others also received microwave-induced hyperthermia (44 degrees C) for 30 minutes once each week. Hyperthermia followed radiotherapy and was given to one group immediately and delayed 4-5 hours in the other. Adjuvant hyperthermia resulted in a significant (p less than .05) increase in complete response rate, reduction in the frequency of non-responders, and increased persistent local control relative to radiotherapy alone. Hyperthermia increased the complete response rate regardless of histology, site, or volume and with the current sample size control was significantly (p less than .05) greater for sarcomas, tumors of the trunk and extremities, and those with volumes less than 10 cc. Quantitative clinical assessment of the acute response of skin and oral mucosa indicated that hyperthermia significantly enhanced these acute reactions, which required roughly twice the healing time observed with radiotherapy alone. Quantitative histologic scoring of changes seen between pre- and post-therapy skin biopsies indicated that a treatment induced decline in the frequency of dermal blood vessels, sebaceous glands, and hair follicles was enhanced by adjuvant hyperthermia, particularly in the late response evaluation interval. The probability of tumor control and adverse normal tissue responses correlated with several measures of thermal dose. Thermal doses in excess of 120 equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C correlated positively with increased skin reactions and negatively with the complete response rate, and these trends were usually evident during the animals' first treatment.

Induction of thermal tolerance of rat sciatic nerve by mild hyperthermia

A 5 mm segment of the rat sciatic nerve was treated at 38 or 43 degrees C for 30 min using a brass thermode. This pretreatment was followed by a test heat treatment at 45 degrees C. Different intervals between the pretreatment and test treatment were studied. The effect of fractionated hyperthermia on the motor function of rat sciatic nerve was evaluated using a functional assay, the toe-spreading test. Both pretreatments led to thermal resistance of the nerve, which was maximal 24 h after the pretreatment. Thermal resistance, induced at 38 degrees C, did not show any decay over a period of 6 weeks. Thermal resistance, induced at 43 degrees C, decayed slowly, but after a 6-week interval between priming and test heat treatment thermal resistance was still observed. As the resistance induced by a mild heat pretreatment is transient, we considered this to be thermotolerance. We accounted for the thermal resistance induced by the 38 degrees C pretreatment in the calculation of the thermal tolerance ratio (TTR) after mild heat treatment at 43 degrees C. Maximal thermal tolerance was observed 24 h after mild heat with a TTR of 3.4 +/- 0.6. The TTR after a 6-week interval had declined to 1.4 +/- 0.3.

The modification of specific absorption rates in interstitial microwave hyperthermia via tissue-equivalent material bolus

Patterns of specific absorption rates generated by interstitial, microwave antenna arrays must be experimentally ascertained and quantified to facilitate their clinical incorporation. Phantom studies involved the use of four single-gap, coaxial antennas oriented in a 2 cm square array. These dipoles were driven in phase by a microwave generator at a frequency of 915 MHz. The inherent limitations in modifying the specific absorption rate patterns were addressed with the addition of bolus to the phantom. These additions of Guy's muscle tissue-equivalent material were made either proximal or distal to the phantom proper. Experiments conducted in the presence and absence of tissue-equivalent material bolus showed the ability to achieve broader bands of 50% power deposition in certain bolus conditions. These heating patterns were sufficiently reproducible and predictable to warrant clinical application of the bolus addition. A through-and-through method of catheter implantation allowed for bolus addition when deemed necessary. Treatments with veterinary and human patients using the bolus method to modify heating patterns yielded augmented patterns of power deposition. The effective length of the antennas that would radiate efficiently was essentially broadened via introduction of a microwave-interacting medium. As a result of the tissue equivalent material's ability to absorb microwave power, it was necessary to interpose minimally-interactive styrofoam spacers to limit heat transfer effects at the tissue-bolus interfaces.

Clinical indications and applications of radiotherapy and hyperthermia in veterinary oncology

The response of dogs and cats with neoplasia to radiation therapy has improved significantly during the past 10 years. This has largely been due to more aggressive radiation therapy treatment schedules, more accurate planning, and refinement of clinical indications. Sufficient numbers of dogs and cats irradiated with curative intent have not been accumulated to yet define the full impact of more aggressive therapy. However, many tumors will likely remain resistant to irradiation because of concomitant normal tissue injury that must be minimized. Systematic investigation of combination therapy (surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hyperthermia) should succeed in reducing local tissue side effects and increased local tumor control. A comprehensive approach to tumor management begins with decisions thoughtful of optimal treatment for suspected malignant tumors even at the time of initial examination and client counseling. An incisional biopsy provides essential information to determine the therapeutic course and should be considered prior to initial excision. More aggressive treatment, of even small tumors, early in the clinical course will lead to prolonged tumor control. Radiation therapy should be considered fundamental in the comprehensive treatment plan of many solid tumors.

Tumor control in long-term survivors following superficial hyperthermia

Sixty tumors with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were treated with radiation and superficial microwave hyperthermia (915 MHz). The overall local control rate was 50% (30/60). The most important factor in outcome was appropriateness of the hyperthermia applicator. Tumors covered by at least the 25% iso-SAR contour achieved 65% local control versus 21% local control with less than 25% SAR coverage (p less than 0.01). Several measures of adequate minimum monitored tumor temperature and duration were considered. The measure best correlated with outcome was best single session time at or above 43 degrees C (t43). If each monitored tumor catheter achieved t43 greater than or equal to 30 minutes in at least one session, then tumor control was significantly (p less than 0.01) improved (63% with Min t43 greater than or equal to 30 versus 25% with Min t43 less than 30). Although there was considerable overlap between tumors with SAR greater than or equal to 25% and those achieving Min t43 greater than or equal to 30, a statistically significant (p = 0.02) difference could be demonstrated between the group meeting both the SAR and the minimum tumor time/duration standards as opposed to those meeting only one standard. The actuarial local progression-free survival for tumors most likely to have had adequate hyperthermia (defined as SAR greater than or equal to 25% and Min t43 greater than or equal to 30) and all other tumors did not begin to separate significantly until 8 to 12 months after treatment. Implications for future randomized studies are discussed.

Side-effects of local hyperthermia: results of a prospectively randomized clinical study

In 1986, 25 patients with stage II and III carcinoma of the cervix were treated by a combination of radiation and local hyperthermia using an endotract intravaginal applicator. Another 25 patients were treated with radiation alone. Both groups were followed up for a minimum period of 18 months. The acute and long-term toxicity of local hyperthermia was closely monitored. Our study shows that whereas local hyperthermia adds significantly to the local control achieved with radiation alone, it is not in any way associated with any significant short- or long-term toxicity, and does not enhance the radiation reactions.