A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients

An individual reference limit for ‘early’ diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer during postoperative follow-up

Aims: This study is a clinical pilot study with the principal aim to investigate the accuracy of a panel of serum tumor markers for the early diagnosis of relapses. We propose a systematic use of serum CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumor marker panel and criteria in order to make it an accurate tool for a postoperative breast cancer monitoring. Materials & methods: 204 disease free breast cancer patients after mastectomy were intensively monitored with serial serum determination of CEA, CA15.3 and TPA. Results: During a mean follow-up of 3.7 years the sensitivity of the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumor marker panel was 93%, the specificity was 97.6% and the rate of false ‘warning signals’ per year of follow-up was 9 per 100 patients. Conclusions: Our results show that the proposed tool is promising for a postoperative monitoring of breast cancer patients.

Intensive post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients with tumour markers: CEA, TPA or CA15.3 vs MCA and MCA-CA15.3 vs CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel in the early detection of distant metastases

Background

In breast cancer current guidelines do not recommend the routine use of serum tumour markers. Differently, we observed that CEA-TPA-CA15.3 (carcinoembryonic (CEA) tissue polypeptide (TPA) and cancer associated 115D8/DF3 (CA15.3) antigens) panel permits early detection and treatment for most relapsing patients. As high sensitivity and specificity and different cut-off values have been reported for mucin-like carcinoma associated antigen (MCA), we compared MCA with the above mentioned tumour markers and MCA-CA15.3 with the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel.

Methods

In 289 breast cancer patients submitted to an intensive post-operative follow-up with tumour markers, we compared MCA (cut-off values, ≥ 11 and ≥ 15 U/mL) with CEA or CA15.3 or TPA for detection of relapse. In addition, we compared the MCA-CA15.3 and CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panels.

Results

Distant metastases occurred 19 times in 18 (6.7%) of the 268 patients who were disease-free at the beginning of the study. MCA sensitivity with both cut-off values was higher than that of CEA or TPA or CA15.3 (68% vs 10%, 26%, 32% and 53% vs 16%, 42%, 32% respectively). With cut-off ≥ 11 U/mL, MCA showed the lowest specificity (42%); with cut-off ≥ 15 U/mL, MCA specificity was similar to TPA (73% vs 72%) and lower than that of CEA and CA15.3 (96% and 97% respectively). With ≥ 15 U/mL MCA cut-off, MCA sensitivity increased from 53% to 58% after its association with CA15.3. Sensitivity of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel was 74% (14 of 19 recurrences). Eight of the 14 recurrences early detected with CEA-TPA-CA15.3 presented as a single lesion (oligometastatic disease) (5) or were confined to bony skeleton (3) (26% and 16% respectively of the 19 relapses). With ≥ 11 U/mL MCA cut-off, MCA-CA15.3 association showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value than the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel.

Conclusion

At both the evaluated cut-off values serum MCA sensitivity is higher than that of CEA, TPA or CA15.3 but its specificity is similar to or lower than that of TPA. Overall, CEA-TPA-CA15.3 panel is more accurate than MCA-CA15.3 association and can "early" detect a few relapsed patients with limited metastatic disease and more favourable prognosis. These findings further support the need for prospective randomised clinical trial to assess whether an intensive post-operative follow-up with an appropriate use of serum tumour markers can significantly improve clinical outcome of early detected relapsing patients.

“Tumour marker guided” salvage treatment prolongs survival of breast cancer patients: final report of a 7-year study

OBJECTIVES

Randomised trials on breast cancer showed no significant benefit from post-operative follow-up with clinical and/or conventional radiological means. We hypothesised that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polipeptyde antigen (TPA), breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA15.3) tumour marker panel is sensitive enough for significantly anticipating salvage treatment and prolonging survival of relapsing breast cancer patients.

METHODS

From October 1981 to May 1999, 68 (62%) of 109 patients with distant metastases were recruited. Thirty-six (53%) received salvage treatment at the time of significant increase in one or more components of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel and negative instrumental examinations ("tumour marker guided" treatment) and 32 (47%) were treated only after radiological confirmation of metastases (conventional treatment). The prognostic factors of the two groups did not show any statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

The time from one or more tumour marker increase to clear clinical and/or radiological signs of distant metastases (lead time) was significantly prolonged in the 36 patients with "tumour marker guided" treatment (17.3 +/- 13.1 vs. 2.9 +/- 2.9 months, P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test) as well as the survival curves from salvage therapy and from mastectomy (the proportion of survivors was: at 36 months from salvage therapy 28% vs. 9%, P = 0.0094; at 84 months from mastectomy 42% vs. 19%, P = 0.0017). The multivariate Cox analysis showed that time from mastectomy to tumour marker increase and "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment were the only significantly different variables (P = 0.00001 and 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These data point out that "tumour marker guided" salvage treatment significantly prolongs disease-free and overall survivals of relapsing responsive patients.

The role of tumour markers in improving the accuracy of conventional chest X-ray and liver echography in the post-operative detection of thoracic and liver metastases from breast cancer

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the value of a serum tumour marker panel in selecting from among the patients with equivocal chest X-ray (CXR) or liver echography (LE) those with thoracic or liver metastases respectively. Between January 1984 and December 1999, 467 (341 non-relapsed and 126 metastatic) breast cancer patients were followed-up postoperatively. Among the 126 metastatic patients 36 showed thoracic (19 patients) or liver (17 patients) metastases, alone or in conjunction with other organs as the first evidence of distant spread. We focused on this series of 377 patients including 341 non-relapsed plus 36 with liver or thoracic metastases. The patients were followed-up after mastectomy with serial determinations of a panel of CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour markers, bone scintigraphy, CXR and LE. Up to December 1999, equivocal CXR occurred in 23 (6.1%) patients of whom 11 (47.8%) developed thoracic metastases; 14 (3.7%) patients showed an equivocal LE of whom 5 developed liver metastases. In the 37 patients with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE prolonged clinical and imaging follow-up over 41 +/- 36 months (mean +/- SD, range 3-163) was used to ascertain the presence or absence of thoracic or liver metastases. In the 23 patients with equivocal CXR the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel to predict thoracic metastases were 92% and 100% respectively. In the 14 patients with equivocal LE the negative and positive predictive values of the tumour marker panel for prediction of liver metastases were 90% and 100% respectively. This study shows that in breast cancer patients the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel has a high value for selecting those patients at high risk of developing clinically evident pulmonary or liver metastases from amongst those subjects with equivocal CXR or equivocal LE.

Description of a Computer Program to Assess Cancer Antigen 15.3, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Tissue Polypeptide Antigen Information during Monitoring of Metastatic Breast Cancer

It is time-consuming to process and compare the clinical and marker information registered during monitoring of breast cancer patients. To facilitate the assessment, we developed a computer program for interpreting consecutive measurements. The intraindividual biological variation, the analytical precision profile, the cutoff limit, and the detection limit for each marker are entered and stored in the program. The assessment procedure for marker signals considers the analytical and biological variation of the applied markers. The software package contains a database that can store the interpretation of the measurements as evaluation codes together with patient demographics, information about treatment type, dates for treatment periods, control periods, and evaluation codes for clinical activity of disease. The consecutive concentrations for a patient are imported temporarily into the program from outside sources and presented graphically. Marker concentrations to be compared are selected with the computer mouse and the significance of the difference is calculated by the program. The program has an option for calculating the lead time of marker signals vs clinical information. The program facilitates the monitoring of individual breast cancer patients with tumor marker measurements. It may also be implemented in trials investigating the utility of potential new markers in breast cancer as well as in other malignancies.

The role of tumour markers in predicting skeletal metastases in breast cancer patients with equivocal bone scintigraphy

Bone scintigraphy (BS) is commonly performed in the staging and postoperative monitoring of breast cancer. Nevertheless, due to low specificity it often demonstrates hot spots with equivocal interpretation, which may be misleading in the management of these patients. The aim of this study was to assess the value of a serum tumour marker panel in selecting among the patients with equivocal BS those with bone metastases. Between January 1986 and December 1995, 297 breast cancer patients were followed-up after mastectomy with serial determinations of a CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel, BS and liver echography. The tumour marker panel was used to select patients with equivocal BS for examination of suspicious bone areas by further imaging techniques. Up to December 1995, 158 (53%) patients showed an equivocal BS and 47 patients developed bone metastases. In the 158 patients with equivocal BS, prolonged clinical and imaging follow-up over 45 months (mean; range 12-120) was used to ascertain the presence or absence of bone metastases. In these 158 patients the negative predictive value and positive predictive value of the tumour marker panel to predict bone metastases was 97% and 75% respectively. This study shows that in breast cancer patients the CEA-TPA-CA15.3 tumour marker panel has a high value in selecting those patients with bone metastases, or at high risk of developing clinically-evident bone metastases, among the large number of subjects with equivocal BS.

A multistep therapy with subcutaneous low dose recombinant interleukin-2, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin prolongs the response of metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a pilot study

Data from 12 metastatic colorectal cancer patients who were submitted to a pilot study with a multistep subcutaneous (sc) low dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administration were compared with those from 13 historical controls who were comparable for the major prognostic indices. All 12 patients in the pilot study were subjected initially to six to eight courses of 5-FU-LV by endovenous (ev) bolus consistent with the Machover schedule alternating with 6 weeks of rIL-2 cycles. At the progression of metastatic disease, the patients were given 500 mg/m2 per day of 5-FU by continuous infusion (ci) for 5 days every 4 weeks and in case of further progression, 2,600 mg/m2 of 5-FU by 24-h ci once a week for 6 weeks. The control patients were treated with 5-FU-LV by the Machover schedule until progression and then observed. As yet, two patients in the pilot study and three control patients are currently alive. In the pilot study, the patients' response rate (CR + PR) and overall response rate (CR + PR + SD) were much higher than in the controls (50 vs 23% and 92 vs 54%, respectively). Time duration of response and survival from primary surgery were more prolonged in the pilot study than in the historical control, although not significantly (10.5 vs 6 and 41.5 vs 29 months, respectively). Time from starting therapy to progression and survival from relapse were significantly in favour of the pilot study (11.5 vs 4 and 31 vs 13.5 months; P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 unpaired t-test, respectively). Low dose s.c. rIL-2 cycles were well tolerated and no interruption occurred. In the pilot study sporadic grade 3 toxicity (diarrhoea or leucopenia) was responsible for the reduction of 5-FU doses to 80% of the previous infusion, but no treatment was postponed. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest the opportunity to initiate large prospective randomized trials using a multistep therapy with rIL-2, 5-FU ci at conventional and at high dose in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Prolonged survival by 'early' salvage treatment of breast cancer patients: a retrospective 6-year study

Between 1977 and 1993, 384 breast cancer patients were followed up post-operatively every 4 or 6 months with a serum tumour marker panel (CEA-TPA-CA15-3) and the usual imaging techniques. Twenty-eight patients were treated 13.5 +/- 10 months (mean +/- s.d.) before the clinical and/or radiological occurrence of distant metastases that were suspected because of an increase in the tumour markers (patients treated 'early'). Their outcome was compared with that of 22 similar patients who were treated only after a definite radiological diagnosis was achieved (patients treated 'not early'). The median survivals from mastectomy and salvage treatment were also compared for the two groups. The groups were similar for all the major prognostic factors (menopause, staging, hormone dependency). In the group treated 'early', the lead time from the tumour marker increase to the clinical and radiological signs of metastases was significantly longer than that of the group not treated 'early' (13.5 +/- 10 vs 3.4 +/- 2.8 months respectively; P < 0.001 by unpaired t-test). For patients treated 'early', the survival curves up to 30 months after salvage treatment and up to 72 months after mastectomy showed greater survival than those for the patients treated later (42.9% vs 13.6% and 42.9% vs 22.7% respectively; P = 0.04 in both instances). These data suggest that treatment triggered by rising tumour markers before clinical and/or radiological appearance of distant metastases can be useful in prolonging both the asymptomatic interval and the duration of response of some relapsed patients. Randomized prospective trials must be encouraged to confirm these data and to better evaluate the effect on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 'early' salvage treatment protocols.

Clinical value of CA 15-3, mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen, tumor polypeptide antigen, and carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring early breast cancer patients

A total of 209 postsurgical breast cancer patients were prospectively monitored with simultaneous serum level estimations of CA 15,3, mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), tumor polypeptide antigen (TPA), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); 141 (67.5%) were free of recurrence and 68 (32.5%) developed metastases during the follow-up. The mean values of tested tumor markers differed significantly in those with progressive disease compared with those free of disease recurrence. The sensitivity of tumor markers were CA 15-3, 68.2%; CEA, 34.1%; MCA, 72.7%; and TPA, 72.7%. The combination of CA 15-3 with TPA or MCA with TPA showed a trend for improved sensitivity of both markers (p = 0.06), with no specific loss of specificity (p = 0.11). The addition of CEA to CA 15-3 or MCA does not provide additional information for clinical evaluation. Patients with elevated tumor marker determinations had significantly shorter survival than those with values within the normal range. Two serial, progressively increasing values of tumor markers during the follow-up strongly predict recurrence. This study indicates that the comeasurement of CA 15-3 with TPA or MCA with TPA is justifiable in monitoring breast cancer patients postoperatively.

Value of CA 15.3 in breast cancer and comparison with CEA and TPA: a study of specificity in disease-free follow-up patients and sensitivity in patients at diagnosis of the first metastasis

The specificity and sensitivity of a tumor marker (TM) are important in establishing its potential clinical utility for a specific type of neoplasm. CA 15.3 is a TM specific for breast cancer; it is defined by two monoclonal antibodies (DF3 and 115D8), whose specificity, in disease-free follow-up patients, and sensitivity, in patients at diagnosis of first metastasis, have been evaluated in the present study and compared with those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA). Serum concentrations of all three TMs were quantified in 618 individuals: 80 healthy controls, 421 patients with local breast cancer who became free of disease following locoregional treatment, and 117 patients with disseminated disease at diagnosis of metastasis. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was the method employed, and the cut-off values obtained were 30 U/ml for CA 15.3, 5 ng/ml for CEA, and 120 U/I for TPA. The results showed CA 15.3 and CEA specificities to be analogous (95.7 and 95.5%, respectively). TPA specificity (81.9%) was lower (p < 0.001). During adjuvant therapy, CA 15.3 serum levels were seen to increase, followed by a normalization of concentration after terminating therapy. On the other hand, CA 15.3 and TPA sensitivities (64.1 and 67.5%, respectively) were greater than for CEA (44.4%, p < 0.01). It is concluded that CA 15.3 is a useful TM for breast cancer, as it offers a greater sensitivity than CEA and a higher specificity than TPA. Combining CA 15.3 and CEA fails to increase CA 15.3 sensitivity, while combining CA 15.3 with TPA increases false-positives and so likewise offers no additional benefit.

[CA 15-3 and breast cancer]

The precise clinical value of CA 15-3 antigen has yet to be determined. With no role in screening for early breast cancer and, even if CA 15-3 seems to be correlated with bulky initial tumor burden, it appears to have no independent prognostic value. The clinical interest of CA 15-3 remains the early detection of the first recurrence. In this regard, more than 75% of first recurrences (all sites included) are associated with a significant rise in CA 15-3 levels, with a particular sensitivity for bone, liver, and lung metastases but which appears lower for locoregional recurrences. More sensitive and specific than CEA, and this whatever the site of recurrence, the rise of CA 15-3 may precede the clinically or radiologically diagnostic of recurrence by a mean lead time from 6 to 9 months. Furthermore CA 15-3 is a reliable marker for clinical course and seems to be of potential interest in monitoring disease follow-up during therapy. In the situation of a clinically isolated elevation of CA 15-3, which investigations, if any, have to be done?, and if negative must do we initiate a treatment for a "biological recurrence"? All these questions remain still opened, and today on consensual attitude can be recommended. In this issue, only results of well-designed prospective trials could help us to determine more rationally, an optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

A novel method for monitoring high-risk breast cancer with tumor markers: CA 15.3 compared to CEA and TPA

BACKGROUND

An early and reliable diagnosis of metastatic spread has increased interest in serum tumor markers. This study investigated the ability of CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA to identify, predict, and exclude metastases in bone/viscera during adjuvant treatment and follow-up of high-risk breast cancer.

METHODS

Ninety females with high-risk breast cancer were included in the study. Response evaluation was based upon clinical examination, x-rays or histology and elaborated marker criteria.

RESULTS

During the marker monitoring period, metastases in four patients were confined to skin or lymph nodes, 21 developed metastases to bone/viscera, and 65 females had no evidence of metastases. CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA correctly classified 48%, 10%, and 19% of the patients with metastases in bone/viscera, and 100%, 94%, and 98% without. Following CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA recurrence, 100%, 33%, and 60% of the patients developed metastases in bone/viscera. Metastases in bone/viscera were excluded in 86%, 76%, and 79% of patients without CA 15.3, CEA, and TPA recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Only CA 15.3 gave reliable information about recurrence. Metastases in bone/viscera were identified in 10 of the 21 patients with CA 15.3. There was no false-positive CA 15.3 information on the 65 patients without clinical recurrence. The PVneg (86%) indicated that when CA 15.3 did not signal recurrence, metastases to bone/viscera were not likely.

Prognostic significance of tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) in head and neck carcinomas

The serum tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) was determined before and at the end of radiotherapy in a group of patients with head and neck epidermoid carcinoma. The baseline values were significantly higher than those in healthy control subjects. They did not depend on the site of the neoplasia but increased with clinical stage. A cut-off value of 85 U/l discriminated two groups of patients according to survival: patients whose values were lower than the cut-off had a disease-free 6-year survival rate of 61%, compared to only 22% in patients with higher TPA levels. Until the second year of follow-up, patients with complete response had baseline values significantly lower than relapsed patients. However, at 5 years the pretreatment values were similar for patients being disease-free, patients with recurrence and patients deceased within the 2-5 year period.

Evaluation of serum CA15-3 determination with CEA and TPA in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients

The usefulness of post-operatively serial serum CA15-3 determination with CEA and TPA was evaluated in a group of 285 breast cancer patients. In particular, the CA15-3 sensitivity to 'early' diagnosis and monitoring of the response to treatment of breast cancer relapses, was compared with those of the two other markers in order to define the most suitable association. Moreover, in a group of 169 non relapsed patients with a prolonged follow-up (40 +/- 8 months; mean +/- s.d.) CA15-3 specificity was investigated. During post-operative follow-up in 27 (10%) patients, distant metastases occurred. In most of them, elevated values of one or more tumour markers were the first pathological sign and CA15-3, CEA and TPA sensitivity to 'early' diagnosis of metastases were 46%, 7% and 63% respectively. When each tumour marker was considered in combination, CA15-3-CEA-TPA association showed a higher sensitivity (87%) than both CA15-3-TPA (83%) and the CEA-TPA (70%). Serum CA15-3 increase preceded the certain sign of metastases 2.7 +/- 2.6 months (mean +/- s.d.). Shortly before appearance and during treatment of distant metastases, constant elevation and/or progressive increase in serum CA15-3 values occurred in all evaluated patients except three in whom isolated elevated values were found as well. In 24 (14%) of 169 non relapsed patients with prolonged follow-up (40 +/- 8 months; mean +/- s.d.) high serum CA15-3 values occurred. In 16 of these 24 patients, an isolated elevated value was found, while four (2.3%) or the eight remaining ones with constant elevation and/or progressive increase were falsely suspected of metastases. In this group of non relapsed patients, chronic liver failure, diabetes and/or hepatic steatosis were the reasons more commonly responsible for the CA15-3 increase. In metastatic patients, no organ-specificity was shown either by CA15-3 or by CEA and TPA. In these patients serum TPA values showed the highest sensitivity and paralleled clinical and/or instrumental signs better than the CA15-3 and even more than CEA values. These data indicate that in the post-operative follow-up of breast cancer patients, TPA is the most useful tumour marker and TPA-CA15-3 the most suitable association. Contemporaneous measurement of serum CEA levels only slightly increases sensitivity and positive predictive value of TPA-CA15-3 combination.

CA-15.3, TPA and MCA as markers for breast cancer

Serum concentrations of CA-15.3, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and mucinous-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA) were measured in 327 women: 81 controls, 93 patients with benign breast disease, 46 patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer and 107 patients during breast cancer follow-up. CA-15.3 was elevated in 16% of the controls, in 29% of the patients with benign breast disease, in 65% of the breast cancer patients and in 74% of the follow-up patients. TPA was elevated in 4%, 11%, 36% and 75%, respectively. The corresponding figures for MCA were 10%, 8%, 30% and 64%. The highest sensitivity for cancer detection (74%) was obtained with a combination of CA-15.3 and TPA, while the specificity of this panel was 75%. The negative predictive value of these combined tests was 93%. MCA scored lower values, being only 30% sensitive. The CA-15.3/TPA panel may increase sensitivity compared with single marker tests and provide additional information for clinical evaluation.