Carcinoembryonic antigen immunocytochemistry in primary breast cancer

Heterogeneity of CEACAM5 in breast cancer

CEACAM5 is overexpressed in many primary breast carcinomas. However, the exact role of CEACAM5 in breast cancer tumorigenesis remains unresolved. Here, we examined a repository of 110 cryopreserved primary breast carcinomas by immunohistochemistry to assess the distribution of CEACAM5 in tumor subtypes. The majority of estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-overexpressing tumors were CEACAM5-positive, whereas most of Triple-negative tumors were negative. Assessing sample sets of paired primary breast cancers and corresponding lymph node lesions from a total of 59 patients revealed a high correlation between primary tumor and lymph node with regard to CEACAM5-status. However, a notable subset of sample sets demonstrated intratumoral heterogeneity in the primary tumor, the metastatic lesion or both, suggesting that both CEACAM5-positive and –negative cells can play a role in tumor dissemination. When examining the consequence of expression of CEACAM5 in breast cancer cell lines in culture assays we found that CEACAM5-expressing cells were less invasive. In survival analysis, using cohort studies of breast cancer, expression of CEACAM5 predicted different clinical outcomes depending on molecular subtypes. Altogether, our analysis suggests that CEACAM5 plays a context-dependent role in breast cancer that warrants further investigation.

CEACAM6 as detected by the AP11 antibody is a marker notable for mucin-producing adenocarcinomas

A new monoclonal antibody recognizing CEACAM6, which we named AP11, was generated by immunizing BALB/c mice with phytohemagglutinin-activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. This study aims to evaluate whether CEACAM6 can serve as a tumor marker using AP11. We examined the expression of CEACAM6 with AP11 in 11 human carcinoma cell lines by flow cytometry and 439 human tissues including 282 tumor tissues and 157 normal tissues by immunohistochemistry. CEACAM6 epitope recognized by AP11 was well preserved in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues. Adenocarcinomas of the stomach (86 %), colorectum (95 %), pancreas (100 %), and lung (83 %), urinary bladder (100 %), and mucinous ovarian tumors (88 %) had a high rate of CEACAM6 immunoreactivity. We observed a variable expression of CEACAM6 in hepatocellular carcinomas (35 %), squamous cell carcinomas of the lung (60 %), renal cell carcinomas (14 %), urothelial carcinomas (13 %), serous carcinomas of the ovary (17 %), and breast carcinomas (11 %). Small-cell carcinomas of the lung, prostatic adenocarcinomas, papillary thyroid carcinomas, malignant melanomas, giant cell tumors, and osteosarcomas were negative for CEACAM6. All normal tissues of various organs were negative for CEACAM6. In conclusion, CEACAM6 as detected by AP11, may serve as a marker for mucin-producing adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract and ovary as well as non-small cell lung cancer. Thus, AP11 represents a valuable diagnostic tool for detecting CEACMA6-positive cancers.

The histological diagnosis of metastases to the breast from extramammary malignancies

This study aims to review histological and immunohistochemical features that are useful in the diagnosis of metastases to the breast. Histological features were compared between non-haematological metastases to the breast and 100 consecutive core biopsy specimens of primary invasive carcinomas of the breast. 18 non-haematological metastases to the breast were diagnosed over a 10-year period (0.3% of malignant mammary tumours). Elastosis and carcinoma in situ were seen only in primary mammary cancers. Two-thirds of tumours had features raising the possibility of metastasis, such as clear cell carcinoma suggestive of renal origin and small cell carcinoma suggestive of pulmonary origin. The features observed in haematological metastases are also described. Immunohistochemical panels to distinguish mammary carcinoma (oestrogen receptor, gross cystic fluid protein-15) from common metastases to the breast, including carcinoma of the lung (thyroid transcription factor-1), malignant melanoma (S100, HMB45, melan-A) and ovarian serous papillary carcinoma (Wilms' tumour 1), are discussed. The pathologist has a key role in considering the diagnosis of metastasis to the breast if the histological features are unusual for a primary mammary tumour. The clinical history is vital in some cases. Immunohistochemistry plays a useful supplementary role.

Expression of CEACAM6 in resectable colorectal cancer: a factor of independent prognostic significance

PURPOSE

CEACAM6, CEACAM1, and human carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are coexpressed in normal colorectal epithelia, but show deregulated expression in colorectal cancers (CRC). Upregulation of CEACAM6 expression in hyperplastic polyps and early adenomas represents one of the earliest observable molecular events leading to colorectal tumors. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of CEACAM6, CEACAM1, and CEA tissue expression in patients with CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out on tissue microarrays from 243 paraffin-embedded biopsies from a randomized controlled clinical trial (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research [SAKK] 40/81) of adjuvant fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with CEACAM-specific monoclonal antibodies. The median follow-up was 8 years. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and hazard ratios (HRs) estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Tissue expression of CEACAM6, CEACAM1, and CEA was enhanced in 55%, 58%, and 94% of patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis including sex, age, tumor site, stage, differentiation grade, treatment, and nodal status as covariates showed that CEACAM6 overexpression independently predicted poor OS (HR, 1.86; P =.0100) and DFS (HR, 2.00; P =.0028), whereas CEACAM1 or CEA were not significantly related to these outcomes. The data did not provide evidence for or against the hypothesis that the CEACAM6 effect on survival differs according to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Expression of the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM6 in CRC is an independent prognostic factor allowing subdivision of patients into low- and high-risk groups. Whether CEACAM6 or CEA and CEACAM1 might be useful as predictive markers of chemotherapy benefit remains unclear.

Breast cancer imaging with radiolabeled antibodies

Over the past 2 decades, numerous anticancer antibodies against different molecular targets and labeled with different gamma-emitting radionuclides have been studied in human tumor xenografts and in clinical trials. In breast cancer, these molecular targets have included principally tumor-associated antigens, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and the polymorphic epithelial mucin antigen, MUC1, and more recently the growth factor receptors, EGF-R and HER-2/neu. No antibody-based agent has yet been approved for clinical use in the diagnosis of mammary carcinoma, because few trials have addressed the issue of clinical use of these imaging agents in the management of breast cancer patients. Recently, the CEA antibody Fab' fragment approved for colorectal cancer detection, Arcitumomab (CEA-Scan, [Immunomedics, Morris Plains, NJ]), has been found to image both palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions that were suspicious on screening mammograms. Results to date indicate that Arcitumomab can complement mammography by providing a high specificity and positive predictive value, thus indicating when a patient with an abnormal mammogram may proceed directly to definitive surgery without an intermediate diagnostic biopsy. Breast cancer immunoscintigraphy holds promise for advancing toward immunoPET, which should combine the specificity of antibodies with the high sensitivity and resolution of PET. It is also the foundation of breast cancer radioimmunotherapy with humanized antibodies against CEA and MUC1, as well as other immunotherapy strategies.

Immunohistochemical differentiation of metastatic breast carcinomas from metastatic adenocarcinomas of other common primary sites

To test the possibility of immunohistochemical differentiation of cytostatically treatable metastatic breast carcinomas from other metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown primary site, we studied a total of 328 metastatic adenocarcinomas including 35 bronchogenic, 26 pancreatic, 25 colonic, 39 gastric, 45 renal, 29 ovarian and 129 breast carcinomas with a panel of 13 commercially available monoclonal antibodies. The expression of gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and/or oestrogen or progesterone receptors had a sensitivity of 0.83, a specificity of 0.93 and a predictive accuracy of 0.92 for carcinomas of the breast against all other carcinomas. Excluding ovarian carcinomas, this combination had a sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy for mammary carcinomas of 0.83, 0.98 and 0.98, respectively. Carcinoembryonic antigen and/or cytokeratin 20 identified bronchogenic, gastric, pancreatic and colorectal carcinomas versus breast carcinomas lacking gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and oestrogen or progesterone receptors with a sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of 0.82, 0.99 and 0.95, respectively. Vimentin differentiates renal cell carcinomas from gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and oestrogene or progesterone receptor negative breast carcinomas with a sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of 0.93, 0.82 and 0.84. Thus, it should be possible to differentiate most metastatic mammary carcinomas from metastatic adenocarcinomas of other common primary sites, even if the former lack expression of gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 and oestrogen or progesterone receptors.

Carcinoembryonic antigen expression in stages I and II breast cancer: its relationship with clinicopathologic factors

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been detected by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma, but its relationship with prognosis is still unclear. This difficulty may be because of the great variety of antibodies used for its determination. In the present study, 271 stages I and II breast carcinomas are analyzed by immunohistochemistry, using T84.66 antibody, a well-known highly specific CEA antibody. The results show that CEA expression was not associated with any of the clinicopathologic factors analyzed. Factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) after univariate logistic regression analyses were tumor size smaller than 2 cm (P = .01), lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), low nuclear grade (P = .007), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .02), and bcl-2 (P = .005) and CEA expression (P = .005), whereas those significantly associated with a better overall survival (OS) were tumor size small than 2 cm (P = .002), lymph node free of metastases (P = .0001), low nuclear grade (P = .01), low histological grade (P = .02), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .002) and bcl-2 expression (P = .01). After multivariate stepwise regression analysis, lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), CEA expression (P = .001), absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .01), and bcl-2 expression (P = .01) were found to be independent factors associated with DFS, whereas lymph node free of metastases (P = .0000), tumor size smaller than 2 cm (P = .0000), and absence of c-erbB-2 overexpression (P = .004) were associated with a better OS. These results show that immunohistochemical detection of CEA with the antibody T84.66 may be useful as an additional factor in establishing breast cancer prognosis.

The relationship of cytoplasmic intermediate filaments and membrane antigens with hormone receptors, nuclear staining density, and mode of stromal invasion in human breast cancer

Serial sections on biopsies of 26 women with invasive breast carcinoma were stained for low molecular weight keratins (LKER), high molecular weight keratins (HKER), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), vimentin (VIM), carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA and pCEA), and nuclear estrogen (mER) and progesterone receptors (mPGR), using monoclonal and polyclonal sera. Specified areas were identified on serially sectioned slides and staining reactions were compared among areas as well as among patients. The study concludes: (1) LKER staining was positively related to (a) the percentage of tumor cells with densely stained nuclei, (b) a trabecular mode of stromal invasion, and (c) HKER and EMA staining, and inversely related to (d) VIM staining and gross tumor size. (2) HKER was also inversely related to gross tumor size. (3) VIM staining was positively related to pCEA staining. (4) VIM staining was inversely related to staining ER and PGR. (5) LKER, HKER, and EMA staining was stronger in areas of trabecular rather than confluent areas of stromal invasion within the same biopsy. (6) Staining for ER and PGR was not related to mode of stromal invasion, but showed a strong inverse relationship with mitotic index. Positive staining for LKER may be an indicator of better differentiation together with densely staining nuclei and trabecular mode of stromal invasion, whilst VIM and pCEA appear to be related to features indicative of lack of differentiation. Hormone receptor positivity seems to be strongly related to mitotic activity rather than differentiation.

Expression of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens in fractions isolated from human breast carcinomas and patients' serum

The aim of this study was to examine tissue from patients with breast carcinoma or benign breast disease for the presence of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens, including the MUC1 mucin and carcinoembryonic antigen CEA. The tests were performed by sodium dodecyl sulphate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic separation of proteins, electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose membranes and immunostaining with the monoclonal antibodies. Some of the antigens identified are known to circulate at high levels in some but not necessarily all, breast carcinoma patients. Serum from a panel of ten breast cancer patients was subjected to a fractionation procedure designed to release antigen from immune complexes, and again these samples were analysed for the presence of monoclonal-antibody-defined antigens. A high frequency of positive reactions was detected by the anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody C595 with both breast carcinoma subcellular membrane fractions as well as antigen fractions eluted from circulating immune complexes. No reactions were observed with equivalent materials from benign breast disease samples. The findings illustrate the variability in antigen expression between breast tumours. The data also indicate that a proportion of patients respond to their tumour by the production of antibodies that recognise the MUC1 antigen in their circulation.

Prognostic relevance of carcinoembryonic antigen and estrogen receptor status in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been reported in 10-95% of breast cancer. Its value as a predictor of disease progression is controversial.

METHODS

The expression of CEA in 202 Stages I and II breast carcinomas was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and the results were correlated with various histologic and clinical parameters to establish CEA's biologic relevance. The mean follow-up of the patients was 6.5 years. The monoclonal antibody used does not cross-react with other molecules in the CEA gene family.

RESULTS

One hundred, thirteen (56%) tumors expressed CEA in more than 15% of the cells. Expression of CEA was associated with positive estrogen receptor (ER) status (P = 0.003). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that, whereas disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were not associated significantly with CEA expression, tumor size, nuclear grade, ER status, lymph node metastases, and stage were. When ER status was stratified to CEA expression, patients who were ER negative and had CEA-negative tumors had a 3.9 times higher risk (P = 0.032) of death than did the patients with CEA-positive tumors. Cox regression analysis revealed that ER was the only parameter with significant interacting effect with CEA. Multivariate, stepwise Cox regression analysis showed that CEA expression, tumor size, and nuclear grade were the only significant independent predictors of DFS, and nuclear grade and lymph node metastasis the only significant predictors of OS in the ER-positive group. The only significant independent predictor of DFS and OS in the ER-negative group was CEA. When CEA expression was stratified to ER status, patients whose tumors lacked CEA and ER had threefold higher risk of disease relapse (P = 0.002) and a 5.3-fold higher risk of death (P = 0.0001) than those with ER-positive and CEA-negative tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that the association between CEA and ER was enhanced further after compensating for other parameters with independent predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between CEA and ER was the most important independent predictor of a subgroup of patients (CEA-negative, ER-positive) with the most favorable prognosis. The results imply that the association of several tumor markers may provide tumor profiles with superior predictive value than a single parameter.

Definition of the expression of the human carcinoembryonic antigen and non-specific cross-reacting antigen in human breast and lung carcinomas

Mouse cell lines transfected with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and with 2 other members of the human CEA gene family, non-specific cross-reacting antigen (NCA) and biliary glycoprotein (BGP), were used to analyze the specificity of several monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). MAbs COL-1 and COL-6 were shown to react with the transfected CEA gene product but not with NCA, confirming previous results. Cells expressing the transfected BGP gene product also failed to react with COL-1 and COL-6. The MAb B6.2 reacted with cells expressing the NCA gene product but not with those expressing CEA or BGP. The MAb B1.1 reacted strongly with the transfected CEA and BGP gene products but only weakly with the NCA gene product. These antibodies were then utilized in the histochemical analysis of a number of primary and secondary breast and lung tumors. The results indicate that a majority of breast and lung tumors express CEA, and nearly all breast and lung tumors express NCA. Fairly homogeneous expression of CEA and NCA was seen in the majority of both breast and lung tumors. Our results indicate that CEA may be an important target for immunotherapy in a large number of patients with breast and lung tumors.

Cellular effects of tamoxifen in primary breast cancer

We have investigated the effect of tamoxifen on the biological characteristics of the primary tumour in 33 patients with breast cancer. All patients had pre-treatment biopsy of the primary breast cancer and subsequent trucut biopsy of the primary tumour after 1-4 months on tamoxifen therapy. The staining patterns in the primary tumour of each of the tumour antigens 115D8, DF3, NCRC-11, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were unaffected by tamoxifen therapy: there was 16%-31% change before vs. during tamoxifen therapy, but this did not reach significance for any of the four antigens. Comparison of the pattern of staining between the four antigens showed 115D8, DF3, and NCRC-11 to be similar to each other both before and during tamoxifen therapy. All three antigens were significantly different from the staining pattern shown by CEA before and during therapy. Tumour antigen expression pre-treatment did not correlate with therapeutic response for any of the four antigens. However, NCRC-11 staining during tamoxifen therapy did correlate with response (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in oestrogen receptor status before and during tamoxifen therapy, both of which correlated with response. DNA ploidy of the tumour before tamoxifen did not correlate with response to therapy, but there was a weak correlation between response and DNA ploidy measured during tamoxifen therapy. In only a minority of tumours (up to 30%) did tamoxifen exert an effect on the biological characteristics studied. Changes in these biological markers were mainly in tumours which responded to tamoxifen, and the changes seen were a tendency to greater expression of differentiation antigens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Newer developments in the diagnosis and staging of breast cancer

Tremendous changes have occurred in the diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. There are more sophisticated diagnostic techniques available and new developments in prognostic indicators that have altered decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. In the near future, progress in quantity and quality of survival may be linked to early diagnosis and precise staging of the disease.

Monoclonal antibodies for radioimmunoscintigraphy of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths among females, and it is estimated that each year, one in ten American women will be newly diagnosed as having the disease. It is therefore not surprising, that a great deal of effort has been made to better understand the biology of breast cancer, and that investigators keep up the search for new tools to better characterize, diagnose and treat these tumours. In this regard, the introduction of the hybridoma technique in 1975 by Kohler and Milstein has lead to an extensive work in the characterization of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against breast cancers. A large number of antibodies has been raised to different epitopes present in normal and neoplastic breast tissue; but unfortunately we have yet to find a highly sensitive and specific monoclonal antibody for breast cancer that can successfully be used for scintigraphic detection of nodal metastases and for radioimmunotherapy treatment of this disease. As possible radioimmunodiagnostics, antibodies are known which react with the following antigens: (1) cytoskeletal proteins (2) breast cell products (3) steroid receptors (4) putative tumor-associated antigens (5) oncogene products (6) pregnancy-related products (7) basement membrane antigens (8) degradative enzymes (9) cell receptors for extracellular matrix molecules (10) multidrug resistance gene product (p-glycoprotein) (11) proliferative markers.