Increased incidence of hypersensitivity to iodine-containing radiographic contrast media after interleukin-2 administration

Late adverse events to iodinated contrast media in patients treated with IL-2: a safety report from the Danish Renal Carcinoma Group (DaRenCa) study - 1

BACKGROUND

A higher incidence of late adverse events (LAEs) to iodinated contrast media in interleukin-2 (IL-2)-treated patients has been reported.

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of LAEs after administration of iodinated contrast media in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with IL-2.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to treatment with IL-2 and interferon-α with/without bevacizumab in the Danish Renal Carcinoma Group study - 1. Patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at baseline, at one month, at three months, and every third month until RECIST 1.1 defined progression. LAEs due to iodinated contrast media were systematically registered according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events classification.

RESULTS

In total, 89 patients were included and underwent a total of 507 contrast-enhanced CT scans. An overall incidence of 46 (9.1%) LAEs was observed in 38 of 89 (42.7%) patients; 3 LAEs at baseline (3.4% of all baseline scans), 39 (13.9%) LAEs during IL-2-based therapies, and 4 (2.9%) LAEs after termination of IL-based therapies. There was no difference in progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment response in patients experiencing LAEs compared to patients without LAEs (P = 0.2, P = 0.5, and P = 0.6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with mRCC demonstrated a higher incidence of LAEs after administration of iodinated contrast during ongoing IL-2 therapy, indicating that iodinated contrast media may cause a recall phenomenon of IL-2 toxicities in patients with mRCC. Treatment with IL-2 should not be a contraindication for contrast-enhanced scans in patients with mRCC but expertise and vigilance are required.

Development of shellfish allergy after exposure to dual immune checkpoint blockade

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem worldwide with limited systemic therapies available. Immunotherapy is a fast-moving field that is quickly evolving as a treatment for HCC with three recent clinical trials published treating HCC with immune checkpoint inhibitors with promising results. Checkpoint inhibition may lead to a unique adverse event profile with the potential to cause immune-related adverse events by unbalancing the immune system. Here, we report a case of a 61-year-old male with advanced HCC who developed a shellfish allergy after completing three cycles of combination of tremelimumab and durvalumab therapy.

Biologic response modifiers: Indications, implications, and insights

The field of biologic immune modulators is currently mushrooming at a dizzying pace. Although most of these biologics are tested and approved for one or a few indications, their unanticipated side effects and off-label use have contributed significantly to our understanding of basic immune mechanisms, the involvement of cytokines in several apparently nonimmunologic diseases, and the importance of compartmentalized immune responses. In this review we attempt to give a bird's-eye view of the major biologics and to highlight insights and implications derived from their secondary effects and adverse reactions.

Safety immunopharmacology: evaluation of the adverse potential of pharmaceuticals on the immune system

The ICH S6R1 and S8 guidelines define a general framework for the immunotoxicity evaluation of biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals and human pharmaceuticals, respectively. As severe and unpredicted adverse events dramatically showed in the recent years that the immune system is a critical aspect of drug safety, this framework needs to be revisited to enhance the prediction of nonclinical immune safety evaluation. Safety immunopharmacology is deemed to contribute to this awaited improvement by enabling early screening of the potential for drug candidates to induce unexpected immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory effects as well as nonimmune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Dedicated safety immunopharmacology can also generate mechanistic data to determine which relevant additional immunotoxicity studies should be conducted. Immunological assays and models that can be considered for use in the context of safety pharmacology studies are presented as well as perspectives for their timely development.

Adverse drug reactions to biologics

The use of biologics has rapidly expanded since the introduction of the first diagnostic antibodies; they are now widely employed in oncology, autoimmune disorders, inflammatory diseases and transplantation medicine. Their widespread use has resulted in an increase in adverse drug reactions. Adverse effects result from both direct pharmacological actions and immunological actions, as well as through induction of a specific immune response. The nomenclature, particularly of the monoclonal antibodies, identifies the target structure and organ as well as the species of origin, which then helps predict their effects and antigenic properties. Depending on the extent of foreign protein, anti-allotypic or anti-idiotypic antibodies with or without neutralizing properties may be induced. Adverse drug reactions from biologics often depend on the target and may be explained by activation or inhibition of particular cytokine pathways. Adverse drug reactions are classified by their pathomechanism, which enhances understanding of the pathogenesis and facilitates both allergologic diagnostic measures and planning of premedication in future treatments. This review emphasizes immunostimulatory and hypersensitivity reactions.

[Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated radiographic contrast agents: an update]

Diagnostic and interventional radiology of patients is nowadays crucial with increasing requirement for iodinated contrast agents infusion. Besides adverse reactions after administration of the iodinated contrast agents due to their toxicity, immediate hypersensitivity reactions and reactions resembling delayed hypersensitivity appearing from 1 hour to several days later, have been reported. Patients at high risk to develop such adverse events have to be detected on the basis of their risk factors in order to prevent or limit serious outcomes. Previous reactions to contrast media, asthma, atopy and cardiovascular disorders are risk factors for anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions. Female gender, age and beta-blockers increase the severity. This article aims to summarize the risk of allergic reactions related to the use of iodinated contrast agents and to suggest a way for diagnosis, treatment and prevention according to each clinical situation.

Glucocorticoids do not inhibit antitumor activity of activated CD8+ T cells

Glucocorticoids are potent immunosuppressive drugs that are generally withheld from cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. We sought to test the hypothesis that glucocorticoids might interfere with the function of cells after adoptive transfer. We gave dexamethasone, a potent synthetic glucocorticoid, to B16 melanoma-bearing mice receiving the adoptive cell transfer (ACT) of pmel-1 T-cell receptor transgenic CD8+ cells. Dexamethasone caused a profound lymphodepletion but, surprisingly, did not alter the antitumor efficacy of ACT-based regimens whether given before, during, or after ACT. Although dexamethasone radically decreased the number of native CD8+ splenocytes in recipient mice, it did not affect the numbers of CD8+ pmel-1 cells derived from ACT in these mice. In vitro proliferation assays revealed acute inhibition of naive pmel-1 CD8+ cells by dexamethasone without significant effect on activated cells. In vitro interferon (IFN)-gamma release from activated pmel-1 CD8+ cells showed partial inhibition by dexamethasone, but this effect was relatively minor when compared with the near-complete inhibition of naive cells. Thus, glucocorticoids had a profound inhibitory effect on naive CD8+ T cells but had little impact on the proliferation and function of activated CD8+ pmel-1 T cells. Finally, because glucocorticoids had no effect on tumor regression in this model, it may be possible to use glucocorticoids in some patients receiving ACT-based immunotherapy regimens.

Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media

Adverse reactions to contrast material are a concern because iodinated contrast materials are commonly used drugs. The risk for adverse reaction is 4% to 12% with ionic contrast materials and 1% to 3% with nonionic contrast materials. The risk for severe adverse reaction is 0.16% with ionic contrast materials and 0.03% with nonionic contrast materials. The death rate, one to three per 100,000 contrast administrations, is similar for both ionic and nonionic agents. More than 90% of adverse reactions with nonionic contrast materials are anaphylactoid. The types of severe reactions seen with nonionic contrast administration were initially predominantly anaphylactoid. With the advent of helical CT angiography, the reactions are now predominantly attributable to cardiopulmonary decompensation. With the widespread use of nonionic contrast materials, adverse reactions are now seen less frequently. Skills involved in evaluating and treating adverse reactions are not as frequently used. Periodic reviews and updates of specific treatment plans for various reactions with the physicians and staff who use contrast material are very important to ensure optimal preparedness. The key to successful treatment is preparation and early intervention.

[Anaphylactoid reactions and late skin reactions to iodinated contrast media: present state of the question--idea development]

PURPOSE

Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) share various mechanisms. Anaphylactoid reactions are among the most serious reactions when they are characterized by the elevation of seric tryptase. Pretreatment with corticosteroids and anti-H1 or the use of non-ionic contrast media do not prevent anaphylaxis. Late skin reactions could be mostly related to delayed hypersensitivity. Previous reactions to contrast media, cardiovascular disorders, beta-blockers, asthma, and atopy are risk factors. Female gender and age increase the severity.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Anaphylaxis can be demonstrated by intradermal tests and the identification of specific IgEs. Delayed hypersensitivity is shown by the results of epicutaneous tests and the immunohistology of the skin.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Allergologic tests are advised in the case of previous reactions. In case of emergency, gadopentetate dimeglumine can be alternatively used. The other risk factors lead to the combination of pretreatment and use of non-ionic monomeric contrast media. Immediate hypersensitivity to iodinated media might increase in the near future with the use of divalent molecules.

Natural history and therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the role of interleukin-2

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in understanding the biology of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) during the past decade, metastatic disease remains nearly incurable and a major medical challenge. Because RCC is known to be immunogenic, immunotherapeutic agents such as recombinant human interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) have represented encouraging treatment modalities.

METHODS

A review of the natural history of and therapeutic approaches to RCC was examined. Studies involving rIL-2 alone and in combination with other adjuvant therapies were critically evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall response rates for metastatic RCC patients treated with rIL-2 were similar (i.e., in the range of 15-20%), regardless of whether rIL-2 was administered as monotherapy or in combination with IFN-alpha. Recombinant IL-2 monotherapy response rates were similar to those of IFN-alpha, but with an increased frequency of complete responses and enhanced response duration. Subcutaneous administration generally resulted in lower toxicity than intravenous administration. The roles of chemotherapy or adoptive immunotherapy in combination with rIL-2 and IFN-alpha therapy remain unclear and require further study. The importance of patient performance status as a predictor of response and survival in rIL-2 therapy was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rIL-2 with or without IFN-alpha may represent the most useful therapeutic approach currently available for patients with good performance status. In patients with borderline performance status or severe comorbid disease, therapeutic approaches depend on patient factors and outcome expectation and may involve cytokine therapy. However, regardless of performance status, palliative measures and/or observation are important choices, because the majority of patients with metastatic RCC are incurable.

Iodinated contrast material in uroradiology. Choice of agent and management of complications

Many conditions seen by urologists require imaging examinations with iodinated radiographic contrast material as a key part of the primary evaluation of the patient. A basic understanding of contrast media, risks of administration, choice of agents, and premedication regimens for high-risk patients, is beneficial in helping patients prepare for their examinations. Urologists may be the primary physicians administering contrast material or may be working with radiologists in the care of patients receiving contrast agents. Because contrast reactions may occur unexpectedly, even during examinations in which the agents are not given intravenously, urologists should be able to recognize and treat the various types of adverse reactions.

Cytokine-induced autoimmune disorders

Cytokines are now commonly used in the treatment of many conditions, especially cancer, haematological malignancies and chronic viral hepatitis. With some of these cytokines, clinical induction and/or exacerbation of autoimmune manifestations have been observed. This has been the case with interferon-alpha and interferon-gamma, interleukin-2 and some colony-stimulating factors. All known biological and clinical autoimmune features have been observed but thyroid abnormalities have been particularly frequent. Some of these manifestations appear to be related to the effect of these exogenous cytokines on the T helper cell (TH) 1/TH2-cytokine balance and the regulatory properties of these cells. Patients with a history of underlying autoimmune disease or baseline serological abnormalities should be monitored for autoimmunity when treated with certain TH1 or TH2-inducing cytokines.

Cutaneous reactions to recombinant cytokine therapy

Cytokines are critical to several fundamental homeostatic mechanisms such as fever, acute phase reactions, wound healing, hematopoiesis, inflammation, cellular and humoral immune responses, and tumor regression. As a result of advances in recombinant DNA technology, recombinant cytokines are available as therapeutic agents. They have been used for metastatic cancers and immunodeficiencies, as a therapy for naturally occurring or drug-induced anemias or leukopenias, and they have also been applied to some cutaneous disorders. Cytokine therapy can result in toxic reactions that affect many organ systems, especially the skin. These reactions are common and diverse, ranging from minor injection site reactions, pruritus, and flushing to life-threatening autoimmune disorders, severe erythroderma, or bullous skin reactions. This review focuses on the major cytokines that are in current clinical use or under investigation and describes the cutaneous complications of these agents.

A role for nitric oxide in X-ray contrast material toxicity

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

We assessed the role that nitric oxide (NO) plays in contrast media (CM) toxicity, using 100% lethal dose (LD100) studies in hyperimmune Brown Norway (BN) rats.

METHODS

Ninety-two BN rats and 41 Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats underwent CM LD100 tail vein injections with methylglucamine iothalamate or sodium iothalamate to the point of cessation of respiration. Methylglucamine hydrochloride also was injected. The injections were accompanied by L-arginine (L-Arg) or D-arginine (D-Arg) analogues or by an H1 blocker. L-Arg analogues inhibit NO formation, and D-Arg analogues do not.

RESULTS

An L-Arg analogue, but not a D-Arg analogue, increased the tolerance of BN rats (p < .005) for methylglucamine iothalamate but not for sodium iothalamate. The L-Arg analogue also protected BN rats against methylglucamine chloride injections (p < .002). H1 blockade protected BN rats against methylglucamine iothalamate (p < .0005) and methylglucamine chloride (p < .005) injections. None of these measures altered the CM tolerance of SD rats. In SD rats, injections of either methylglucamine iothalamate or sodium iothalamate along with a D-Arg analogue or normal saline were better tolerated than similar injections in BN rats (p < .01 and .002 for methylglucamine iothalamate and sodium iothalamate, respectively). In SD rats but not BN rats, sodium iothalamate was better tolerated than was methylglucamine iothalamate (p < .0005).

CONCLUSION

NO appears to play a significant role in BN rats LD100 CM toxicity and has been implicated by others in the blood pressure fall characterizing some forms of antigen-induced anaphylaxis [1, 2]. The results of the current study and the literature suggest that methylglucamine-modulated release of histamine from mast cells may underlie the NO production.

The clinical experience with interleukin-2 in cancer therapy

In May 1992, interleukin-2 (IL-2) was formally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in cancer treatment based on its activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. IL-2 alone or in combination with activated lymphocytes or other cytokines has significant anti-tumor activity against renal cell carcinoma and melanoma with response rates of 15-20%, some of which are quite durable. Limited anti-tumor effects have been noted in some patients with colorectal cancer and lymphoma. Too few patients have been studied to establish the level of activity in most other specific tumor types. The mechanism of this anti-tumor effect appears to be entirely mediated by the immunostimulatory effects of IL-2. Toxicities are dose related, but are substantial and similar regardless of the schedule of administration. Randomized trials have failed to establish (1) the superiority of high-dose bolus over continuous infusion IL-2, (2) the superiority of IL-2 plus interferon over IL-2 alone, or (3) the superiority of IL-2 plus LAK cells versus IL-2 alone. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimum dose and schedule from the standpoint of cost:benefit and risk:benefit, and to determine the role of IL-2 in the therapy of other malignant diseases.

Autoimmunity and selected environmental factors of disease induction

Autoimmune diseases may be induced by physical and/or chemical environmental factors. A review of the available literature on mercuric chloride, iodine, silicone, anilides, L-tryptophan, vinyl chloride, and canavanine suggests three general mechanisms by which they may induce disease. First, oxidative damage probably is a frequent process involved in disease induction and pathogenesis. Second, certain compounds also may generate antigen-specific immune responses that could then cross-react with self-tissues. Other xenobiotics might bind to self-tissues and increase self-tissue immunogenicity. Third, physical and chemical agents may also modulate the immune system. Finally, in response to controversies surrounding the influence of human activities on global climate changes, the immunosuppressive effects of ozone and ultraviolet radiation are discussed.

Clinical toxicity of interleukin-2

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is increasingly used to treat patients with cancers refractory to conventional treatment. Flu-like syndromes are extremely frequent but usually mild. A variety of skin complications (mostly erythema and mucositis) have been reported. Life-threatening skin reactions have also been described. Acute reactivation of psoriasis can also occur. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions have so far not been described, but IL-2 treatment has been shown to predispose to acute hypersensitivity reactions to iodine-containing contrast media. Hypothyroidism is the major endocrine complication and antithyroid antibodies have been detected in approximately 50% of patients. Neurological and psychiatric disturbances with moderate or severe mental status changes are common and sometimes treatment-limiting. The occurrence of peritumoural oedema in patients with brain metastases can also be a major practical problem. Musculoskeletal disorders are transient and resolve spontaneously. The vascular leak syndrome is the most frequent and severe complication of IL-2 of which weight gain, generalised oedema, hypotension and impaired renal function are the main features. Even though a damaging effect on vascular endothelium cells by various cytokines released by activated lymphoid cells or mediated by non-lymphocyte-dependent factors has been proposed to be involved, the mechanism remains unclear. Other cardiovascular injuries, possibly life-threatening, including myocarditis, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction, can occur during the first days of treatment. Supraventricular arrhythmias are the most common rhythmic disorder. Decreases in myocardial contractility and haemodynamic pattern similar to those of septic shock have been encountered in most cases. Acute renal dysfunction is common but resolves with symptomatic management. Intrahepatic cholestasis with hyperbilirubinaemia is observed in most patients but permanent liver damage has not been described. Several cases of pancreatitis have been reported. Anaemia, thrombocytopenia, lymphocytopenia and eosinophilia are frequent and occur in most if not all patients. Some data suggest a high incidence of infectious complications, particularly in patients with surgically tunnelled catheters, but marked flu-like syndromes may be confounding. Finally, death directly related to IL-2 treatment has been noted in less than 1% of all patients. Investigations are under way to minimise IL-2 toxicity with varying dose regimens and combined treatments.