Teniposide (VM-26) and continuous infusion cytosine arabinoside for initial induction failure in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A Pediatric Oncology Group pilot study

Chemotherapy for initial induction failures in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group Study (POG 8764)

Children with acute lymphocytic leukemia who fail to enter remission have a poor prognosis. In a previous study, 9 of 14 children with induction failure entered remission after teniposide (VM26) plus cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C). We attempted to confirm these results. Twenty children received teniposide (200 mg/m/day IV) for 3 days and cytosine arabinoside (100 mg/m/day continuous IV infusion) for 7 days. There were 3 complete and 3 partial responses. Two additional patients achieved a complete response after a second, shorter course of the same agents. Although VM26 plus Ara-C is an active combination for treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia induction failure, it does not appear as effective as in the initial report. Better treatments for this problem are needed.

Outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with induction failure treated by the Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia study (JACLS) ALL F-protocol

BACKGROUND

Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who fail to achieve complete remission (CR) after induction therapy (induction failure: IF) have a poor prognosis; however, there have been few prospective studies in patients with IF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 1997 and March 2005, 27 of 1,237 leukemic patients (2.2%) failed to achieve CR after four- or five-drug induction therapy. Twenty-three of these patients entered the F-protocol study, which mainly consisted of acute-myeloid-leukemia-oriented chemotherapy followed by scheduled hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).

RESULTS

Seventeen (73.9%) of the 23 patients responded to re-induction chemotherapy with CR. Of note, 15 (93.8%) of 16 patients with Philadelphia-chromosome-negative (non-Ph(+)) ALL achieved CR; in contrast, only 2 (28.6%) of 7 Ph(+) patients achieved CR. Fourteen (82.4%) of 17 patients remained in CR (CCR) until their scheduled HCT, 12 of the 14 with CCR underwent HCT as scheduled, and 6 patients remain in first CR after a median of 78 months (range, 49-107 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 16 patients with non-Ph(+) and 7 patients with Ph(+) were 43.8 +/- 12.4% and 14.3 +/- 13.2%, respectively (P = 0.012). The 5-year OS rate of the 17 patients who obtained CR by re-induction therapy and the 6 who did not were 47.1 +/- 12.1% and 0%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Acute-myeloid-leukemia-oriented chemotherapy followed by scheduled HCT is a promising treatment strategy for non-Ph(+) ALL patients with IF.

Prognostic factors for leukemic induction failure in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and outcome after salvage therapy: the FRALLE 93 study

PURPOSE

To identify prognostic factors and to evaluate the outcome of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) failure after induction therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between June 1993 and December 1999, 1,395 leukemic children were included in the French Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 93 study.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (3.8%) had a leukemic induction failure (LIF) after three- or four-drug induction therapy. In univariate analysis, high WBC count (P = .001), mediastinal mass (P = .017), T-cell phenotype (T-ALL; P = .001), t(9;22) translocation (P = .001), and a slow early response (at day 8 and/or on day 21, P = .001) were predictive of LIF. The following three prognostic groups for LIF were identified by multivariate analysis: a low-risk group with B-cell progenitor (BCP) ALL without t(9;22) (odds ratio [OR] = 1), an intermediate-risk group with T-ALL and a mediastinal mass (OR = 7.4, P < .0001), and a high-risk group with BCP-ALL and t(9;22) or T-ALL without a mediastinal mass (OR = 28.4, P < .0001). Complete remission (CR) was subsequently obtained in 43 patients (81%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of the 53 patients was 30% +/- 6%. The 5-year OS rate among allogeneic graft recipients, autologous graft recipients, and after chemotherapy were 30.4% +/- 9.6% (50% +/- 26% after genoidentical transplantation), 50% +/- 17.7%, and 41.7% +/- 14.2%, respectively (P = .18). Fourteen patients (26%) were still in first CR after a median of 83 months (range, 53 to 117 months).

CONCLUSION

Three risk categories for LIF in children with ALL were identified. Approximately one third of patients with LIF can be successfully treated with salvage therapy overall. Subsequent CR after LIF is mandatory for cure.

Intermediate-dose methotrexate and intravenous 6-mercaptopurine chemotherapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who did not respond to initial induction therapy

PURPOSE

To determine the complete remission rate of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who were not induced into remission by initial therapy, when subsequently treated with intermediate-dose methotrexate and intravenous 6-mercaptopurine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children with B-precursor ALL who did not achieve initial remission after 4 or 6 weeks of standard three- or four-drug induction chemotherapy were entered on study. Therapy consisted of three doses at weekly intervals of methotrexate 1,000 mg/m2 over 24 hours followed by 6-mercaptopurine 1,000 mg/m2 over 8 hours 20 minutes. Patients achieving a partial remission could receive two additional weekly courses of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine. Initially, patients received weekly intrathecal chemotherapy, but the study was amended to include intrathecal therapy only at week 1.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were entered on study. All were evaluable for toxicity and response. There were seven complete remissions, four partial remissions, six patients with no response, and two children with progressive disease, for an overall complete remission rate of 37%. One patient was removed from the study after the second course of methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine because of renal failure. Two patients had neurologic toxicity resulting in a study amendment. No patients subsequently experienced neurologic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate and intravenous 6-mercaptopurine can induce remission in some patients with ALL who experience initial induction failure. Features predicting complete remission, however, could not be identified.

Treatment of childhood acute myelogenous leukemia with an intensive regimen (AML-87) that individualizes etoposide and cytarabine dosages: short- and long-term effects

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a treatment regimen for pediatric acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) that uses four rotating drug pairs and adjusts dosages of etoposide and cytarabine to target specific plasma concentrations. Thirty-one girls and 27 boys (median age, 9.7 years) with de novo AML were treated on the protocol. Six cycles of chemotherapy were planned. Cycles 1 to 4 comprised the drug combinations cytarabine plus etoposide, cytarabine plus daunomycin, etoposide plus amsacrine, and etoposide plus azacitidine, respectively. For cycles 5 and 6, the first two combinations were repeated. Dosages were adjusted to achieve plasma concentrations of 1.0 microM +/- 0.1 microM cytarabine and 30 microM +/- 0.3 microM etoposide. Forty-four patients (76%) entered complete remission. Of those, 24 have had relapses; 23 remain alive in first or subsequent remission. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) estimate was 31.0% +/- 5.9%; the 5-year survival estimate was 41.4% +/- 6.3%. Six patients (10%) died of the toxic effects of therapy. Severe neutropenia occurred in all cycles. Long-term complications of therapy included hepatitis C, cardiac insufficiency, and hearing loss. Adjustment of cytarabine and etoposide dosage was feasible for achieving targeted plasma drug concentrations; however, the potential clinical efficacy of this approach was offset by substantial acute and long-term toxicity.

Induction failure in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood

BACKGROUND

Although it is widely accepted that failure to achieve complete remission (CR) portends a poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), there is variability in the precise definition of induction failure and, to the authors' knowledge, few published data exist regarding the outcome of patients who are slow to achieve CR.

METHODS

Between 1987-1995, 774 children with ALL were treated on 2 consecutive protocols and were evaluable to assess the time required to attain CR. The authors compared presenting characteristics and outcomes of patients based on their remission status after 1 month of induction chemotherapy: CR (n = 656), protracted hypoplasia (low peripheral blood counts and/or hypocellular marrow) (n = 95), and persistent leukemia (M2 or M3 bone marrow and/or evidence of extramedullary leukemia) (n = 23). The median follow-up was 5.2 years.

RESULTS

Presenting features that predicted persistent leukemia included a leukocyte count > 100,000/mm3 and T-cell phenotype. Approximately 91% of patients with persistent leukemia and 100% with protracted hypoplasia eventually achieved CR. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) (95% confidence intervals [95% CI] in parentheses) for patients with persistent leukemia after 1 month was 16% (95% CI, 0%, 31%), which was significantly worse (P < 0.001) than that for those who achieved CR within 1 month (5-year EFS, 82%; 95% CI, 79%, 86%) and that for those with protracted hypoplasia (5-year EFS, 79%; 95% CI, 70%, 87%). For patients with persistent leukemia, there was no significant difference in survival based on bone marrow status (M2 or M3) after 1 month or on the number of induction cycles received before achieving CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with persistent leukemia at the end of 1 month of therapy have a dismal prognosis, regardless of when they subsequently achieve CR. More intensive and/or novel therapies should be considered for this subset of patients.

Epipodophyllotoxins in the treatment of childhood cancer

We reported marked biologic activity with the epipodophyllotoxins in phase I/II studies of childhood cancer conducted in the 1970s. We have since extensively used the combination of teniposide and ara-C in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Initially we treated patients with refractory disease and found that the combination lacked clinical cross-resistance with standard antileukemic drugs. This formed a rationale to move teniposide and/or etoposide to front-line therapy of childhood ALL. The superior results projected for our last trial, an overall cure rate of about 75%, are attributable in part to early use of epipodophyllotoxins. This class of agents is also used extensively in the treatment of newly diagnosed childhood solid tumors, including neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and germ-cell tumors. Secondary leukemias following treatment with epipodophyllotoxins have been reported in a small subset of patients. Current data show that the most important risk factor is the schedule of drug delivery, which has led to appropriate protocol modifications.