Hoskins PJ, Le N, Gascoyne RD, Klasa R, Shenkier T, O'Reilly S, Connors JM. Advanced diffuse large-cell lymphoma treated with 12-week combination chemotherapy: natural history of relapse after initial complete response and prognostic variables defining outcome after relapse.
Ann Oncol 1997;
8:1125-32. [PMID:
9426332 DOI:
10.1023/a:1008263602334]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE
To define both the natural history of and prognostic factors affecting outcome post relapse from a complete response in advanced stage diffuse large-cell lymphoma.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A total of 468 patients aged 17-74 years received the 12-week duration chemotherapy regimens MACOP-B, VACOP-B and ACOP-12 between 1 April 1981 and 31 December 1995 for advanced stage diffuse large, mixed or immunoblastic lymphoma. Of these 402 entered a complete remission, 97 (24%) of whom subsequently relapsed. Initial staging data, follow-up, and relapse information were analyzed to define the natural history of relapse and also subjected to univariate and multivariate correlation with overall (OS) and failure free survival (FFS).
RESULTS
Eleven percent of the relapses were low grade. All other relapses were of intermediate grade with 75% occurring within the first two years, the remainder up until the eleventh year. Median and five-year OS from the time of relapse for intermediate grade relapse were 12 months and 20%; for FFS they were eight months and 18% respectively. Adverse independent factors, for both OS and FFS were: less than one year to relapse, decreasing performance status at relapse, and more than three nodal sites at relapse.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-grade relapse is not uncommon in patients who initially presented with diffuse large cell lymphoma. As the management of low- and intermediate grade disease is so different biopsy proof of the nature of the relapse is of value. The prognostic factors identified need to be taken into consideration when analyzing results from trials of secondary treatment so as to avoid erroneous conclusions about comparative treatment efficacy.
Collapse