Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for intracranial tumors

Photon Radiosurgery: A Clinical Review

The term radiosurgery has been used to describe a variety of radiotherapy techniques which deliver high doses of radiation to small, stereotactically defined intracranial targets in such a way that the dose fall-off outside the targeted volume is very sharp. Proton, charged particle, gamma unit, and linear accelerator-based techniques appear to be equivalent from the standpoint of accuracy, dose distributions, and clinical results. However, capital and operating costs associated with the use of linear accelerators in general clinical use are much lower. Radiosurgery has an established role in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations and acoustic neurinomas. Interest in these techniques is increasing in neurosurgical and radiation oncological communities, as radiosurgery is rapidly assuming a place in the management of several other conditions, including craniopharyngiomas, meningiomas, and selected malignant lesions.

Early and Late Complications Following Dynamic Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Between December 1986 and June 1990, 112 patients (116 lesions), underwent treatment with dynamic stereotactic radiosurgery at McGill University. Of the treated lesions, 59 were arteriovenous malformations and 53 were a variety of other neoplastic or non-neoplastic conditions. In 86 lesions, the treatment was delivered in a single fraction and the treatment of the remaining 30 lesions was fractionated. Complications attributed to treatment developed in seven of the 112 patients (6.3%). No relationship was found between complications and prescribed dose, fractionation, collimator diameter, type and anatomical region of the lesion that was treated, or previous irradiation. Although extensive clinical experience will be necessary to determine optimal total doses, the potential role of fractionated treatment, and the tolerance of critical structures to radiosurgery, the relatively low incidence of complications in our series allows us to conclude that radiosurgery is well tolerated by the vast majority of patients.

Current developments in radiotherapy for paediatric brain tumours

This review summarises current developments in radiation oncology and how they impact on the management of children with brain tumours. Improved understanding of radiobiology has led to attempts to improve the therapeutic ratio with hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Recent advances in planning and delivery of radiotherapy, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and proton therapy allow a more precise localisation of the maximum dose region with maximum sparing of normal brain. Increasingly interactions between drugs and radiotherapy are exploited, but it is important to evaluate toxicity of combined modality therapy. The introduction of models to predict the impact of radiotherapy dose-volume parameters on long-term neuropsychological function will hopefully lead to further benefit with respect to sparing of normal tissue morbidity.

New Radiation Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

This article reviews the most recent technology used in the treatment of head and neck cancer. It discusses brachytherapy, new ways to mix radionuclides for enhanced radiobiologic effects, and different fractionation schemes that have grown in clinical importance. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become a mainstay in head and neck cancer treatment, and the authors discuss several popular and emerging approaches. Patient immobilization and imaging are also discussed.

Hearing preservation after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the hearing preservation rate and to determine its prognostic factors after gamma knife (GK) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with vestibular schwannoma, the authors used a prospective study design to analyze these patients.

METHODS

Between December 1997 and January 2002, 25 patients with vestibular schwannoma with serviceable hearing were enrolled in the current study. The median tumor volume was 3.0 cc (0.16-9.1 cc). The prescription dose was 12.0 +/- 0.7 gray at an isodose line of 49.8 +/- 1.1%. The tumor control rate and complications were evaluated by focusing on hearing preservation and its prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Based on radiologic study, the tumor control rate was 92% during the median follow-up period of 45 months. The trigeminal and facial nerve preservation rates were 95% and 100%, respectively. Thirteen (52%) of the 25 patients preserved serviceable hearing and 9 (36%) patients retained their pre-GK G-R grade levels after GK SRS. However, 16 patients showed hearing deterioration > 20 dB within 3-6 months and this trend continued for 24 months after the treatment. The maximum radiotherapy dose delivered to the cochlear nucleus was the single, significant prognostic factor of hearing deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors concluded that a more sophisticated strategy to prevent hearing deterioration during the first 6 months post-GK SRS is necessary to improve long-term hearing preservation.

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy For the Treatment of Large Arteriovenous Malformations with or without Previous Partial Embolization

OBJECTIVE:

Despite the success of stereotactic radiosurgery, large inoperable arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of 14 cm3 or more have remained largely refractory to stereotactic radiosurgery, with much lower obliteration rates. We review treatment of large AVMs either previously untreated or partially obliterated by embolization with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) regimens using a dedicated linear accelerator (LINAC).

METHODS:

Before treatment, all patients were discussed at a multidisciplinary radiosurgery board and found to be suitable for FSR. All patients were evaluated for pre-embolization. Those who had feeding pedicles amenable to glue embolization were treated. LINAC technique involved acquisition of a stereotactic angiogram in a relocatable frame that was also used for head localization during treatment. The FSR technique involved the use of six 7-Gy fractions delivered on alternate days over a 2-week period, and this was subsequently dropped to 5-Gy fractions after late complications in one of seven patients treated with 7-Gy fractions. Treatments were based exclusively on digitized biplanar stereotactic angiographic data. We used a Varian 600SR LINAC (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) and XKnife treatment planning software (Radionics, Inc., Burlington, MA). In most cases, one isocenter was used, and conformality was established by non-coplanar arc beam shaping and differential beam weighting.

RESULTS:

Thirty patients with large AVMs were treated between January 1995 and August 1998. Seven patients were treated with 42-Gy/7-Gy fractions, with one patient lost to follow-up and the remaining six with previous partial embolization. Twenty-three patients were treated with 30-Gy/5-Gy fractions, with two patients lost to follow-up and three who died as a result of unrelated causes. Of 18 evaluable patients, 8 had previous partial embolization. Mean AVM volumes at FSR treatment were 23.8 and 14.5 cm3, respectively, for the 42-Gy/7-Gy fraction and 30-Gy/5-Gy fraction groups. After embolization, 18 patients still had AVM niduses of 14 cm3 or more: 6 in the 7-Gy cohort and 12 in the 5-Gy cohort. For patients with at least 5-year follow-up, angiographically documented AVM obliteration rates were 83% for the 42-Gy/7-Gy fraction group, with a mean latency of 108 weeks (5 of 6 evaluable patients), and 22% for the 30-Gy/5-Gy fraction group, with an average latency of 191 weeks (4 of 18 evaluable patients) (P = 0.018). For AVMs that remained at 14 cm3 or more after embolization (5 of 6 patients), the obliteration rate remained 80% (4 of 5 patients) for the 7-Gy cohort and dropped to 9% for the 5-Gy cohort. A cumulative hazard plot revealed a 7.2-fold greater likelihood of obliteration with the 42-Gy/7-Gy fraction protocol (P = 0.0001), which increased to a 17-fold greater likelihood for postembolization AVMs of 14 cm3 or more (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION:

FSR achieves obliteration for AVMs at a threshold dose, including large residual niduses after embolization. With significant treatment-related morbidities, further investigation warrants a need for better three-dimensional target definition with higher dose conformality.

Preliminary study of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer

From March 1997 to November 1999, 45 patients with lung cancer were treated by a stereotactic radiotherapy, with 15 cases treated by a stereotactic radiotherapy alone, and 30 cases by the external radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiotherapy. The clinical target volume was 1.89-187.26 cm3 with the median being 18.17 cm3. The doses of plan target volume (PTV) edge was 16-30 Gy/2-3 times and the doses of center was 120% to 150% of PTV edge doses. The overall response rate was 84.4% (38/45), with 11 complete response (CR) and 27 partial response (PR). This study confirmed that the stereotactic radiotherapy is a safe and effective therapy for lung cancer. For those early-stage patients who can tolerate neither operation nor even conventional radiotherapy for various reasons, it can both achieve therapeutic purpose and improve quality of life.

The linear-quadratic model and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the dose per fraction that could be used when gamma knife or linear accelerator-based stereotactic treatments are delivered in 2 or more fractions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The linear-quadratic (LQ) model was used to calculate the dose per fraction for a multiple-fraction regimen which is biologically equivalent to a given single-fraction treatment. The results are summarized in lookup tables.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The tables can be used by practicing clinicians as a guide in planning fractionated treatment. For the large doses used in typical stereotactic treatments and for small fraction numbers, the model is not very sensitive to the value of the alpha/beta ratio in the LQ model. A simple rule of thumb is found that for two-fraction and three-fraction treatments the dose per fraction is roughly two-thirds and one-half of the single-fraction treatment dose, respectively.

The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the treatment of primary and metastatic brain tumors

With the widespread diffusion of stereotactic radiosurgical procedures, GKR treatments have gained considerable momentum as a major therapeutic option for patients harboring primary or metastatic brain tumors. Present results in high grade gliomas indicate a potential palliative role of this technique. The overall low radiosensitivity of these oncotypes and their infiltrative nature-with the resulting problems in properly defining the tumor target-are still a major obstacle to further development of the approach. In this regard, useful contributions are expected from advances in molecular neurobiology and functional neuroimaging as shown by preliminary investigations with MR spectroscopy. Surgery maintains a dominant role in the therapeutic armamentarium for low grade gliomas. However, in unfavorable cases (unresectable tumors, recurrences), GKR seems to be an effective alternative to conventional radiochemotherapy. In grade 2 astrocytomas and specifically in grade 1 pilocytic forms, short-to-mid-term reported studies have documented encouraging 70 to 93% local tumor control rates, with minimal cerebral toxicity. Finally, during the last decade, GKR has become a primary treatment choice for patients harboring small-to-medium-size brain metastases, with reasonable life expectancy and no impending intracranial hypertension. Focal tumor responses are consistently elevated, even in the most radioresistant oncotypes (melanoma, renal carcinoma); median and actuarial survival rates are far better than with conventional radiation treatments and are comparable to those observed in accurately selected surgical-radiation series.

Evaluation of dose calculation algorithms for dynamic arc treatments of head and neck tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate if the Pencil Beam (PB) algorithm takes the disturbance of the dose distribution due to tissue inhomogeneities sufficiently into account in dynamic field shaping rotation therapy (called the dynamic arc treatment modality) for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A treatment plan using the dynamic arc treatment modality of an oropharynx lesion on a humanoid phantom was evaluated. The same plan was calculated with three different calculation algorithms: the Clarkson and the PB algorithm (both available on the planning system of the Novalis system used for dynamic arc treatments), and the Collapsed Cone Convolution Superposition (CC) algorithm (used by the Pinnacle planning system). The three resulting plans are compared using isodose distributions and cumulative dose volume histograms (CDVHs). An intercomparison of the results of the three algorithms was performed to investigate how accurately each of them takes the influence of tissue inhomogeneities into account such as bony structures and air cavities often appearing in the head and neck region. Additionally, the resulting plans were compared with absolute and relative dosimetric measurements of the treatment plan on the humanoid phantom with thermoluminescent detectors and radiographic film, respectively.

RESULTS

All calculated dose distributions show a good agreement with the measured distribution except in the planning target volume (PTV) in and at the border of the air cavity. All three algorithms overestimate the dose in the PTV at the boundary with the low-density tissue, with 12, 10 and 7% for the Clarkson, the PB and the CC algorithm, respectively. The correspondence between the calculated dose distributions is reflected in the graphs of the CDVHs. They show similar curves for the PTV and the structures except for the left parotic gland and the myelum.

CONCLUSIONS

The PB algorithm of the Novalis system calculates a treatment plan for the dynamic arc treatment modality adequately for fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy of head and neck tumors, except in the PTV in and at the border of the air cavity where the actual dose is overestimated. Care needs to be taken in clinical cases where it is critical to irradiate the air-tissue boundary to a sufficient dose.

The TALON removable head frame system for stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy: measurement of the repositioning accuracy

PURPOSE

To present the TALON removable head frame system as an immobilization device for single-fraction intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMRS) and fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FS-IMRT); and to evaluate the repositioning accuracy by measurement of anatomic landmark coordinates in repeated computed tomography (CT) examinations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine patients treated by fractionated stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy underwent repeated CTs during their treatment courses. We evaluated anatomic landmark coordinates in a total of 26 repeat CT data sets and respective x, y, and z shifts relative to their positions in the nine treatment-planning reference CTs. An iterative optimization algorithm was employed using a root mean square scoring function to determine the best-fit orientation of subsequent sets of anatomic landmark measurements relative to the original image set. This allowed for the calculation of the x, y, and z components of translation of the target isocenter for each repeat CT. In addition to absolute target isocenter translation, the magnitude (sum vector) of isocenter motion and the patient/target rotation about the three principal axes were calculated.

RESULTS

Anatomic landmark analysis over a treatment course of 6 weeks revealed a mean target isocenter translation of 0.95 +/- 0.55, 0.58 +/- 0.46, and 0.51 +/- 0.38 mm in x, y, and z directions, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 1.38 +/- 0.48 mm. The 95% confidence interval ([CI], mean translation plus two standard deviations) for repeated isocenter setup accuracy over the 6-week period was 2.34 mm. Average rotations about the x, y, and z axes were 0.41 +/- 0.36, 0.29 +/- 0.25, and 0.18 +/- 0.15 degrees, respectively. Analysis of the accuracy of the first repeated setup control, representative of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery situations, resulted in a mean target isocenter translation in the x, y, and z directions of 0.52 +/- 0.38, 0.56 +/- 0.30, and 0.46 +/- 0.25 mm, respectively. The mean magnitude of isocenter translation was 0.99 +/- 0.28 mm. The 95% confidence interval for these radiosurgery situations was 1.55 mm. Average rotations at first repeated setup control about the x, y, and z axes were 0.24 +/- 0.19, 0.19 +/- 0.17, and 0.19 +/- 0.12 degrees, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TALON relocatable head frame was seen to be well suited for immobilization and repositioning of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. Because of its unique removable design, the system was also seen to provide excellent repeat immobilization and alignment for fractionated stereotactic applications. The exceptional accuracy for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgical application of the system was seen to deteriorate only slightly over a 6-week fractionated stereotactic treatment course.

System validation and work practice efficiency gains of a new localization method for stereotactic radiotherapy

The increased procedural demands of stereotactic localization techniques when compared with conventional treatment practices reduces machine efficiency, an outcome likely to be greatly magnified by the introduction of fractionation to stereotactic techniques. Currently in Australia and New Zealand there are no guidelines for the definition of efficiency. We sought to devise a system to simultaneously validate the accuracy and efficiency of the technique. The frameless relocation methods employed in the Medtronic Sofamor Danek (MSD) stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) system were studied in the clinical setting. Accuracy has been determined according to the accumulation of errors throughout the planning and treatment process. The clinical demands of the system (staffing and resources) were analysed relative to conventional treatment approaches. Timing studies indicate a mean time of 19.7 min for treatment of a daily SRT fraction (4-5 arcs, single isocentre). Cost and staffing requirements are similar to those for conventional radiotherapy. It is concluded that with the system used, SRT is efficient for routine clinical implementation, with the level of efficiency increasing with increasing patient numbers. It is recommended that a common acceptance standard be developed to allow cross-institutional comparison of the clinical efficiency of new treatment techniques.

Combined stereotactic split-course fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery and conventional radiation therapy for unfavorable gliomas: a phase I study

Object. This investigation was performed to determine the tolerance and toxicities of split-course fractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (FSRS) given in combination with conventional external-beam radiation therapy (CEBRT).

Methods. Eighteen patients with previously unirradiated, gliomas treated between March 1995 and January 2000 form the substrate of this report. These included 11 patients with malignant gliomas, six with low-grade gliomas, and one with a recurrent glioma. They were stratified into three groups according to tumor volume (TV). Fifteen were treated using the initial FSRS dose schedule and form the subject of this report. Group A (four patients), had TV of 5 cm3 or less (7 Gy twice pre- and twice post-CEBRT); Group B (six patients), TV greater than 5 cm3 but less than or equal to 15 cm3 (7 Gy twice pre-CEBRT and once post-CEBRT); and Group C (five patients), TV greater than 15 cm3 but less than or equal to 30 cm3 (7 Gy once pre- and once post-CEBRT). All patients received CEBRT to 59.4 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions. Dose escalation was planned, provided the level of toxicity was acceptable. All patients were able to complete CEBRT without interruption or experiencing disease progression. Unacceptable toxicity was observed in two Grade 4/Group B patients and two Grade 4/Group C patients. Eight patients required reoperation. In three (38%) there was necrosis without evidence of tumor. Neuroimaging studies were available for evaluation in 14 patients. Two had a partial (≥ 50%) reduction in volume and nine had a minor (> 20%) reduction in size. The median follow-up period was 15 months (range 9–60 months). Six patients remained alive for 3 to 60 months.

Conclusions. The imaging responses and the ability of these patients with intracranial gliomas to complete therapy without interruption or experiencing disease progression is encouraging. Excessive toxicity derived from combined FSRS and CEBRT treatment, as evaluated thus far in this study, was seen in patients with Group B and C lesions at the 7-Gy dose level. Evaluation of this novel treatment strategy with dose modification is ongoing.

Brain tumors in the older person

BACKGROUND

The incidence of brain tumors is increasing rapidly, particularly in the older population. Advances in molecular biology help to explain differences in biologic behavior and response to therapy of brain tumors in the elderly compared with younger patients. The number of elderly patients who desire and receive therapy for brain tumors and are included in clinical trials is increasing.

METHODS

This article reviews the literature on the epidemiology, clinical aspects, and therapy of brain tumors, with emphasis on the older patient population.

RESULTS

The increased incidence of brain tumors in the elderly is principally due to the increasing number of people who comprise the older population. Age and performance status are important independent prognostic indicators, together with tumor histology. Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy can benefit elderly patients with brain tumors with favorable histologies, tumor location, and good performance status. The response rates to available therapies are less favorable than in younger patients, and only a small number of elderly patients are enrolled in clinical studies addressing new treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain tumors in the elderly have specific characteristics that determine their biologic behavior and response to therapy. There is a need for clinical studies designed for treatment of brain tumors in older patients, and requirements for rehabilitation and support systems for the elderly need to be addressed.

Fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for extracranial head and neck tumors

BACKGROUND

This study is to report the clinical experiences of fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) for extracranial head and neck tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between the period of July 1995 and November 1998, 48 patients with extracranial head and neck tumors were given FSRT as a boost and sole modality. Individualized treatment planning was performed using XKnife-3 system with relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame. In 24 patients, FSRT was applied as a boost technique following the 2-dimensional conventional external radiation therapy (ERT); in 24 patients FSRT was the sole radiotherapy modality. The primary diseases in the boost group consisted of nasopharynx cancer (19), lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma (3), orbital lymphoma (1), and skull-base recurrence of maxillary sinus adenoid cystic carcinoma (1). The primary diseases in the sole modality group consisted of recurrent nasopharynx cancer (12), orbital pseudotumor (4), skull-base recurrence of maxillary sinus, submandibular gland, and hypopharynx cancers (3), orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (2), orbital lymphoma (1), orbital metastasis of neuroblastoma (1), and nasal cavity melanoma (1). The fractionation schedule was to give 5 treatments per one week and the fractional doses were 2.0-3 Gy depending on the treatment aim and the FSRT volume. The FSRT doses varied depending on the nature of the primary diseases.

RESULTS

The local tumor response in nasopharynx cancer patients was excellent compared to retrospective data without occurrence of unexpectedly severe complication. FSRT to other regions was well tolerated by the patients and resulted in good to excellent local tumor responses with no unacceptable side effects as expected by the authors.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current observations, FSRT is a very effective and safe modality in the treatment of extracranial head and neck tumors.

Preliminary report of a phase I study of combined fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and conventional external beam radiation therapy for unfavorable gliomas

PURPOSE

To determine the tolerance and toxicities of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (FSRS) given in combination with conventional external beam radiation therapy (CEBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From March 1995 to September 1998, 14 patients with previously unirradiated and unfavorable glioma (malignant glioma, n = 8; unfavorable low-grade glioma, n = 5; and recurrent glioma, n = 1) were stratified into 3 groups according to tumor volume (TV) to determine the initial FSRS dose schedule: Group A (n = 3): TV </= 5 cc (7 Gy x 2 pre- and post-CEBRT]; Group B (n = 6): 5 cc < TV </= 15 cc [7 Gy x 2 pre- and 7 Gy x 1 post-CEBRT]; and Group C (n = 5): 15 cc < TV </= 30 cc (7 Gy x 1 pre- and post-CEBRT). All patients received CEBRT to 59.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction. Dose escalation was planned, if toxicity was acceptable.

RESULTS

All patients were able to complete CEBRT without interruption or experiencing disease progression. Unacceptable toxicity has been limited to patients in groups B (grade 4, n = 2/6) and C (grade 4, n = 2/5). Eight patients required reoperation, with 3 (38%) having necrosis without evidence of tumor. Eleven patients (79%) have had objective partial (>/=50% reduction, n = 2) or minor (>20% reduction, n = 9) imaging response. Follow-up ranged from 9 to 51 months (median 15 months), with 7 patients alive at 22-51 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging response and the ability of these patients with unfavorable intracranial gliomas to complete therapy without interruption or experiencing disease progression is very encouraging. Excessive toxicity of combined FSRS and CEBRT as evaluated thus far in this study was seen for patients with group B/C lesions. Evaluation of this novel treatment strategy with dose modification is ongoing.

Increased tumor cures using combined radiosurgery and BCNU in the treatment of 9l glioma in the rat brain

PURPOSE

Radiosurgery refers to the delivery of high, single focused beams of ionizing radiation to defined intracranial lesions. 1,3 Bis[2-chloroethyl]-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and cis-diammine-1, 1-cyclobutane-dicarboxylate platinum (II) (carboplatin) are commonly used cytotoxic agents for the treatment of malignant gliomas of the brain. Drug therapies have exhibited a modest enhanced cell killing when combined with radiation in experimental animal tumor systems. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the role of cytotoxic drugs, such as BCNU and carboplatin, in combination with a single high dose of radiosurgery on the tumor control rates of 9L tumors in the rat brain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Combined radiosurgery (25 Gy single dose) and/or chemotherapy (a single dose of BCNU, 7 mg/kg, i.p. 1.5 or 16 h prior to or 16 h after irradiation or a single dose of carboplatin, 30 mg/kg, administered either 1 h or 4 h prior to irradiation) was delivered 12 days after stereotactic tumor implantation. For dose escalation study, 4-10 mg/kg of BCNU was used.

RESULTS

The radiation alone group showed a dose-dependent survival. A single dose of 25 Gy to the control group resulted in an increase of the median survival time from 20 days to 42 days, but all animals died of the tumor in 50 days. A significant prolongation of the median survival time of animals was more than 100 days, resulting in animal cures of 50% or more when combined with radiosurgery (25 Gy) and BCNU (7 mg/kg). BCNU alone did not prolong the median survival time of the animal with the 9L brain tumor. In contrast, there was no survival improvement when the animals were treated with combined radiosurgery and carboplatin. None of the long-term surviving animals showed any significant brain tissue damage as evaluated by histopathology and clinical observations.

CONCLUSION

The data clearly suggest that the combined modalities of radiosurgery and concomitant BCNU represent an effective therapeutic regimen in the treatment of radioresistant human malignant gliomas of the brain. This study represents the first experimental report of the effectiveness of combined chemotherapy and radiosurgery.

Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme using fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent paclitaxel

Despite the progress in neurosurgery and radiotherapy, almost all patients treated with malignant gliomas develop recurrent tumors and die of their disease. Eighty-eight patients (median age 56 years) with recurrent glioblastoma (median tumor volume 32.7 cm3) were treated with noninvasive fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent paclitaxel used as a sensitizer. The median interval between diagnosis of primary glioblastoma and salvage radiosurgery was 7.8 months. Four weekly treatments (median dose: 6.0 Gy) were delivered after the 3-hour paclitaxel infusion (median dose: 120 mg/m2). Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method from radiosurgery treatment. Overall median survival was 7.0 months, and the 1-year and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 17% and 3.4%, respectively. When grouped by performance status, there was no difference in survival between the patients with low and high Karnofsky score. Patients with tumor volume less than 30 cm3 survived significantly longer than those with tumor greater than 30 cm3 (9.4 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.0001). Their 1-year survival rate was 40% and 8%, respectively. Eleven patients (11%) had reoperation because of expanding mass. Stable disease was seen in 40% of patients (n = 34), and increase in radiographically detected mass was observed in 41 patients (48.8%). Although the treatment of recurrent GBM is mostly palliative, the fractionated radiosurgery offers a chance for prolonged survival, especially in patients with a smaller tumor volume.

Linear accelerator radiosurgery in the management of brain tumours

Radiosurgery is an increasingly popular method for treating a variety of intracranial tumours. A great deal of treatment data has been accumulated suggesting that radiosurgery may be the treatment of choice for small acoustic schwannomas. Moreover, radiosurgery promises excellent tumour control and minimal risk in the treatment of small meningiomas in risky surgical locations such as the cavernous sinus. Radiosurgery offers superior local control rates for many metastatic neoplasms and has promise as an adjuvant 'boost' technique in certain malignant gliomas. This article presents a brief description of the linear accelerator, LINAC, radiosurgical technique, followed by a review of the more common applications of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of intracranial neoplastic disease.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.

Immediate side effects of stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Despite increased utilization of fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), the incidence and nature of immediate side effects (ISE) associated with these treatment techniques are not well defined. We report immediate side effects from a series of 78 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intracranial lesions in 78 adult patients were treated with SRT or SRS, using a dedicated linear accelerator. Those lesions included 13 gliomas, 2 ependymomas, 19 metastatic tumors, 15 meningiomas, 12 acoustic neuromas, 4 pituitary adenomas, 1 optic neuroma, 1 chondrosarcoma, and 11 arteriovenous malformations (AVM). SRT was used in 51 and SRS in 27 patients. Mean target volume was 9.0 cc. Eleven patients received prior external-beam radiation therapy within 2 months before SRT/SRS. Any side effects occurring during and up to 2 weeks after the course of radiation were defined as ISE and were graded as mild, moderate, or severe. The incidence of ISE and the significance of their association with several treatment and pretreatment variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 28 (35%) of 78 patients experienced one or more ISE. Most of the ISE (87%) were mild, and consisted of nausea (in 5), dizziness/vertigo (in 5), seizures (in 6), and new persistent headaches (in 17). Two episodes of worsening neurological deficit and 2 of orbital pain were graded as moderate. Two patients experienced severe ISE, requiring hospitalization (1 seizure and 1 worsening neurological deficit). ISE in 6 cases prompted computerized tomography of the brain, which revealed increased perilesional edema in 3 cases. The incidence of ISE by diagnosis was as follows: 46% (6 of 13) for gliomas, 50% (6 of 12) for acoustic neuromas, 36% (4 of 11) for AVM, 33% (5 of 15) for meningiomas, and 21% (4 of 19) for metastases. A higher incidence of dizziness/vertigo (4 of 12 = 33%) was seen among acoustic neuroma patients than among other patients (p< 0.01). There was no significant association of dizziness/vertigo with either a higher average and maximum brainstem dose (p = 0.74 and 0.09, respectively) or with 2-Gy equivalents of the average and maximum brainstem doses (p = 0.28 and 0.09, respectively). Higher RT dose to the margin and higher maximum RT dose were associated with a higher incidence of ISE (p = 0.05 and 0.01, respectively). However, when RT dose to the margin was converted to a 2-Gy dose-equivalent, it lost its significance as predictor of ISE (p = 0.51). Recent conventional external-beam radiation therapy, target volume, number of isocenters, collimator size, dose inhomogeneity, prescription isodose, pretreatment edema, dose of prior radiation, fraction size (2.0-7.0 Gy with SRT and 13.0-21.0 Gy with SRS), fractionation schedule, and dose to brainstem were not significantly associated with ISE. ISE occurred in 26% (8) of 31 patients taking corticosteroids prior to SRT/SRS and in 20 (42%) of 47 patients not taking them (p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

ISE occur in one third of patients treated with SRT and SRS and are usually mild or moderate and self-limited. Dizziness/vertigo are common and unique for patients with acoustic neuromas and are not associated with higher brainstem doses. We are unable to detect a relationship between ISE and higher margin or maximum RT doses. No specific conclusion can be drawn with regard to the effect of corticosteroids, used prior to SRS/SRT, on the occurrence of ISE.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: rationale and methods

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a widely accepted technique for the treatment intracranial neoplasms. Combined with modern imaging modalities, SRS has established its efficacy in a variety of indications. From the outset, however, it was recognized that the delivery of a single large dose of radiation was essentially "bad biology made better by good physics." To achieve the accuracy required to compensate for this biological shortcoming, the application of SRS has required that a neurosurgical head frame of some sort be rigidly attached to the patients head. Historically, this prerequisite has, primarily for practical reasons, precluded the delivery of multiple fractions over multiple days. With recent improvements in immobilization and repeat fixation, the good biology of fractionated delivery has been realized. This technique, which has come to be known as stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has significantly expanded the efficacy of the technique through the use of accurate physical targeting coupled with the basic radiobiological principles gleaned from decades of clinical experience.

The integral biologically effective dose to predict brain stem toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to develop a parameter for use during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning to aid in the determination of the appropriate treatment volume and fractionation regimen that will minimize risk of late damage to normal tissue.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We have used the linear quadratic model to assess the biologically effective dose at the periphery of stereotactic radiotherapy treatment volumes that impinge on the brain stem. This paper reports a retrospective study of 77 patients with malignant and benign intracranial lesions, treated between 1987 and 1995, with the dynamic rotation technique in 6 fractions over a period of 2 weeks, to a total dose of 42 Gy prescribed at the 90% isodose surface. From differential dose-volume histograms, we evaluated biologically effective dose-volume histograms and obtained an integral biologically-effective dose (IBED) in each case.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients in the study, 36 had target volumes positioned so that the brain stem received more than 1% of the prescribed dose, and 4 of these, all treated for meningioma, developed serious late damage involving the brain stem. Other than type of lesion, the only significant variable was the volume of brain stem exposed. An analysis of the IBEDs received by these 36 patients shows evidence of a threshold value for late damage to the brain stem consistent with similar thresholds that have been determined for external beam radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

We have introduced a new parameter, the IBED, that may be used to represent the fractional effective dose to structures such as the brain stem that are partially irradiated with stereotactic dose distributions. The IBED is easily calculated prior to treatment and may be used to determine appropriate treatment volumes and fractionation regimens minimizing possible toxicity to normal tissue.

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent taxol in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Surgery and systemic chemotherapy offer modest benefit to patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. These tumors are associated with rapid growth and progressive neurological deterioration. Radiosurgery offers a rational alternative treatment, delivering intensive local therapy. A pilot protocol to treat recurrent glioblastoma was developed using fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent intravenous (i.v.) Taxol as a radiation sensitizer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The treatment outcome was analyzed in 14 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent Taxol. Median tumor volume was 15.7 cc and patients received a mean radiation dose of 6.2 Gy at 90% isodose line, 4 times weekly. The median dose of Taxol was 120 mg/m2.

RESULTS

The median survival was 14.2 months, 1-year survival was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival for this small group of patients was similar to or better than historical controls or patients treated with single-fraction radiosurgery alone. This data should stimulate the investigation of both fractionated radiosurgery and the development of radiation sensitizers to further enhance treatment.

The University of Florida frameless high-precision stereotactic radiotherapy system

PURPOSE

To develop and test a system for high precision fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy that separates immobilization and localization devices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patient localization is achieved through detection and digital registration of an independent bite plate system. The bite plate is made and linked to a set of six infrared light emitting diodes (IRLEDs). These IRLEDs are detected by an infrared camera system that identifies the position of each IRLED within 0.1 to 0.15 mm. Calibration of the camera system defines isocenter and translational X, Y, and Z axes of the stereotactic radiosurgery subsystem and thereby digitally defines the virtual treatment room space in a computer linked to the camera system. Positions of the bite plate's IRLEDs are processed digitally using a computer algorithm so that positional differences between an actual bite plate position and a desired position can be resolved within 0.1 mm of translation (X, Y, and Z distance) and 0.1 degree of rotation. Furthermore, bite plate misalignment can be displayed digitally in real time with translational (x, y, and z) and rotational (roll, pitch, and yaw) parameters for an actual bite plate position. Immobilization is achieved by a custom head mold and thermal plastic mask linked by hook-and-loop fastener tape. The head holder system permits rotational and translational movements for daily treatment positioning based on the bite plate localization system. Initial testing of the localization system was performed on 20 patients treated with radiosurgery. The system was used to treat 11 patients with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Assessment of bite plate localization in radiosurgery patients revealed that the patient's bite plate could be positioned and repositioned within 0.5 +/- 0.3 mm (standard deviation). After adjustments, the first 11 patients were treated with the bite plate repositioning error reduced to 0.2 +/- 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

High precision stereotactic radiotherapy can be delivered using separate localization and immobilization systems. Treatment setup and delivery can be accomplished in 15 min or less. Advantages compared with standard systems require further study.

Paclitaxel as a radiosensitizer combined with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of recurrent medulloblastoma

This report describes the treatment of a 39-year-old man with recurrent medulloblastoma previously treated with extensive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A novel treatment technique combining paclitaxel (275 mg IV bolus) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (30 Gy in six fractions over 3 weeks) was given to palliate the patient's significant neurologic symptoms. The patient experienced a significant improvement both radiographically and in the quality of his life at follow-up 5 months after completion of treatment. No toxicity has been observed. The treatment of medulloblastoma with paclitaxel and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, either alone or in combination, merits further investigation.

The risk of interstitial radiotherapy of low-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The risk of side effects of low activity (i.e. <20 mCi) Iodine-125I (125I) interstitial radiotherapy was analyzed in patients with low-grade gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Permanent (247 patients) or temporary 125I-implants (268 patients) were used with a median reference dose of 60 Gy and 100 Gy, respectively, which was calculated to the outer rim of the tumour. The mean dose rate for temporary implants was low (median, 10 cGy/h). Risk factors were obtained from the multivariate proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

Radiogenic complications occurred in 39/515 patients (28 patients with transient symptoms and 11 patients with progressive symptoms). The most important risk factor was the volume of the intratumoural 200 Gy isodose. Available experimental data have associated a high dose zone in this range with the size of the treatment induced radionecrosis. Rapid tumour shrinkage (decrease of the tumour volume > or =50%) within the first 6 months with subsequent centripetal movement of non-pathologic tissue into the high dose zone and a reimplantation were additional risk factors. Radiation injury after rapid tumour shrinkage could be better avoided with temporary implants. A 200 Gy isodose volume <4.5 ml corresponded to an estimated risk of radiogenic complications <3%. There was a steep increase of the risk beyond this limit. Translation of the 200 Gy isodose volume in terms of the treatment volume and the reference dose allows rational treatment planning. The estimated risk of a temporary implant with an applied reference dose of 60 Gy and a treatment volume <23 ml was <3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The intratumoural necrotizing effect of a low activity 125I implant limits its application to small treatment volumes. Radiation injury outside the treatment volume can be better avoided with temporary implants in the case of rapid tumour shrinkage.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with cis-platinum radiosensitization in the treatment of recurrent, progressive, or persistent malignant astrocytoma

External beam irradiation of malignant astrocytoma often provides temporary local tumor control, but dose is limited by potential toxicity to normal brain. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) provides additional radiation to the tumor with less dose deposition in adjacent normal brain. We administered a potential radiosensitizer, cis-platinum (CDDP), to optimize the therapeutic index. CDDP (40 mg/m2) was given weekly, with SRT once or twice weekly, to 20 patients. One had a partial response, 11 stable disease, and eight progressed despite therapy. Acute toxicities were manageable. Five patients required surgery for tumor progression or radiation necrosis. Median response duration was 18.5 weeks and median survival was 55 weeks. SRT combined with CDDP is safe, with durable responses in some patients. Further investigations to determine optimal SRT and CDDP doses and scheduling are justified.

Symptomatic intrasellar hemangioblastoma in a child treated with subtotal resection and adjuvant radiosurgery. Case report

The first documented case of a symptomatic intrasellar hemangioblastoma is described, occurring in an 11-year-old girl with stigmata of von Hippel-Lindau disease who presented with headaches, progressive bitemporal hemianopsia, and adenohypophysial dysfunction. A subtotal resection of the lesion was achieved with two separate surgical procedures: a transsphenoidal approach and a subfrontal craniotomy. Subsequent growth of residual tumor was treated with combined conventional radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery. Two years following completion of these adjuvant therapies, no residual tumor was evident on magnetic resonance imaging. Previous experience with hemangioblastoma in this region, as well as the rationale for radiotherapy in the treatment of incompletely resected lesions, is reviewed.

The effect of setup uncertainties on the radiobiological advantage of fractionation in stereotaxic radiotherapy

PURPOSE

There may be radiobiological advantages in administering stereotaxic radiation treatment in multiple fractions instead of by a single irradiation. However, a larger planning target volume may be required for fractionated stereotaxic radiotherapy than for a single session treatment, if decreased geometrical precision and increased setup uncertainty are associated with multiple-fraction treatments. This factor may partially offset the radiobiological gain. The purpose of this study is to estimate the potential therapeutic gain of fractionated treatments for brain tumors, and to assess the effect of increased setup uncertainty on the potential gain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The concept of biologically effective dose (BED), based on the linear quadratic (LQ) model, was used to quantify the therapeutic efficacy of the respective treatment schema. Therapeutic gain (TG) was defined as the ratio of tumor BEDs, for multiple fractions and single treatment, respectively, for the same normal brain BED. To include the effect of increased planning volume in fractionated treatment, a power-law relationship was assumed for the volume dependence of prescription dose, and the TG was recalculated using the "volume-adjusted" doses.

RESULTS

The therapeutic gain for fractionated treatment increases with fraction number, and is smaller for larger single treatment doses. For example, in going from 1 to 10 fractions, the TG is 1.40, 1.32, or 1.27 for single treatment dose of 20, 30, or 40 Gy, respectively. Also, the TG is more significant for the initial few fractions. The benefit of fractionation is diminished if larger planning volume is needed for multiple fraction treatments. For example, the above TG are reduced to 1.19, 1.11, or 1.06, if a 2 cm planning target volume in single fraction treatment is enlarged to 2.3 cm in fractionated treatment.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of the therapeutic gain with fractionation should include estimates of setup uncertainty for multiple-fraction treatments, relative to that of single fraction radiosurgery.

Radiosurgery for recurrent cranial base cancer arising from the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for head and neck cancers that recur at the cranial base are limited.

METHODS

Twelve patients with head and neck cancers recurrent after resection and fractionated radiotherapy (n = 11) at the cranial base had stereotactic radiosurgery using the gamma unit. The median dose to the tumor margin was 16 Gy. Imaging follow-up varied from 3 to 17 months; the longest clinical follow-up was at 35 months.

RESULTS

Three of 8 tumors studied by postradiosurgery imaging remained unchanged in size, 3 decreased, and 2 were no longer visible. There was no morbidity or worsening of symptoms after radiosurgery. Four patients died between 4 and 8 months and did not have postradiosurgery imaging performed. Mean survival after radiosurgery was 10.5 months, with 7 patients (58%) still living.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiosurgery proved safe and effective in providing local control for recurrent cranial base cancers arising from the extracranial head and neck. Radiosurgery should be considered for those patients who have failed prior fractionated radiation or surgical resection, those who have tumors in high-risk cranial locations, or those who are poor medical candidates. Although this study shows its potential adjuvant role, longer follow-up and increased clinical experience will be necessary to evaluate the overall role of radiosurgery in head and neck cancer.

The possible role of linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of multifocally and heterochronously recurrent malignant astrocytomas. A case report

We present a 24-year-old woman with multifocal and heterochronous recurrence of malignant astrocytomas that were consecutively treated by linac-based sterotactic radiotherapy. The patient had previously received multimodalities of treatment for malignant astrocytomas in the right occipital lobe consisting of surgical resection on four occasions, conventional external-beam irradiation, immunological therapy, and systemic chemotherapy. Thereafter she developed relatively small and well-demarcated recurrent lesions in eight different sites, most of which were located in eloquent and deep-seated regions. She underwent ten fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy courses with a median total dose of 42 Gy, seven fractions of 6 Gy each in 15 days, experiencing neither any adverse effects nor neurologic deterioration. Three out of 10 treated lesions responded well with subsequent reduction in size, and 80% of them did not increase at least for 6 months, although 66.7% of the lesions eventually exhibited enlargement of the enhanced areas, some of which were presumed as radiation necrosis. These clinical results suggest that the fractionated linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy had significant effects on tumor growth inhibition and attainment of acceptable patient performance status.

Radiosurgery in the initial management of malignant gliomas: survival comparison with the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery on the survival of patients treated with malignant gliomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 115 patients from three institutions (75 from the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, 30 from the University of Wisconsin, and 10 from the University of Florida) were treated with a combination of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and linac-based radiosurgery as part of similar institutional protocols from March 1988 through July 1993. Patients were stratified into six prognostic classes (classes 1-6) based on the recursive partitioning analysis of multiple prognostic factors previously reported by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

RESULTS

The actuarial 2-year and median survival for all patients analyzed was 45% and 96 weeks, respectively. In comparison to the results from a previously published analysis of 1578 patients entered on three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group external beam radiotherapy protocols from 1974 to 1989, those patients treated with radiosurgery had a significantly improved 2-year and median survival (p = 0.01) corresponding with a standardized mortality risk ratio of 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31, 0.85]. This improvement in survival was seen predominantly for the worse prognostic classes (classes 3-6). The 2-year survival for the radiosurgical patients compared with the previously reported patients was 81% vs. 76% for classes 1/2, 75% vs. 35% for class 3, 34% vs. 15% for class 4, and 21% vs. 6% for classes 5/6, respectively. Although Karnofsky performance status and prognostic class were significant on univariate analysis, only the Karnofsky score was a significant predictor of outcome on multivariate analysis. Median and 2-year survival for patients with a Karnofsky score > or = 70 was 106 weeks and 51%, respectively, as compared to 38 weeks and 0% for patients with a Karnofsky score < 70% (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of radiosurgery to conventional treatment (surgery and external beam radiotherapy) of malignant gliomas appears to improve survival when compared to historical reports. These results should be interpreted with caution because the recursive partitioning model does not completely predict the prognosis of the patients treated in the present study. Although this study suggests that radiosurgery may prolong survival in patients with malignant gliomas, the role of radiosurgery in the management of these patients remains to be defined by a prospective randomized trial.

Linac radiosurgery for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: rationale and technique

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma benefit from reirradiation. A main barrier to successful palliation or cure is dose limitation secondary to normal tissue tolerance. There are many strategies to increase the tolerated dose to the recurrent lesions. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of these lesions has rarely been reported.

METHODS

Three patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated with linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery.

RESULTS

One patient remained disease-free 1 year after radiosurgery; the second patient had neurologic deterioration of uncertain etiology (complication vs recurrence) 6 months after radiosurgery; and the third patient had local recurrence 6 months after radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic radiosurgery can be used to deliver a boost dose of radiation to recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinomas. The technique is increasingly available and may offer some advantages compared with other techniques. Treatment recommendations are presented.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for pediatric and adult brain tumors: preliminary report

PURPOSE

Stereotactic radiotherapy is a new modality that combines the accurate focal dose delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery with the biological advantages of conventional radiotherapy (1.8-2.0 Gy/day using 25-30 fractions). The modality requires sophisticated treatment planning, dedicated high-energy linear accelerator, and relocatable immobilization devices. We report here our early experience using stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial neoplasms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 1992 and September 1993, we treated 82 patients with central nervous system lesions using stereotactic radiotherapy, delivered from a dedicated 6 MV stereotactic linear accelerator. A head fixation frame provided daily relocatable setup using a dental plate for all patients over 8 years of age. A modified head frame, which does not require a mouthpiece, was used for children requiring anesthesia. The patients ranged in age from 9 months to 76 years. Thirty-three patients were children less than 21 years of age. Selection criteria for the protocol included: (a) focal, small (< 5 cm) radiographically distinct lesions known to be radiocurable (pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma, meningioma, acoustic neuroma, pilocytic astrocytoma, retinoblastoma), and (b) lesions located in regions not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery such as the brain stem or chiasm. Standard fractionation and conventional doses were delivered. Patients with low-grade astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, or ependymoma were treated using a dose escalation regime consisting of conventional doses plus a 10% increase.

RESULTS

Although follow-up is 16 months (range 3-16 months), posttreatment radiographic studies in 77 patients have been consistent with changes similar to those found after conventional radiation therapy. To date, reduction of up to 50% of the original volume has been noted in 19 out of 77 patients, and 4 patients had a complete response, 2 with dysgerminoma, and 1 each with astrocytoma and retinoblastoma. In 56 patients disease was either stable or the follow-up was too short for evaluation. While the follow-up is relatively short, there have been no in-field or marginal recurrences. The only unexpected radiographic findings were in three patients with pilocytic astrocytomas, who developed asymptomatic edema in the treatment volume. Accuracy in daily fractionation was excellent. In over 2000 patient setups with 41,000 scalp measurements, reproducibility was found to be within 0.41 mm (median) of baseline readings, allowing for precise immobilization throughout the treatment course. The treatment in all cases was well tolerated with minimal acute effects. Our stereotactic radiotherapy facility can provide fractionated therapy for 10-12 patients a day efficiently and accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment and relocatable stereotactic head frames were well tolerated with minimal acute effects. No long-term sequelae have been noted, although the observation period is short. To fully define the role of stereotactic radiotherapy, we are conducting prospective studies to evaluate neurocognitive and neuroendocrine effects. We expect that this innovative approach will make a significant impact on the treatment of intracranial neoplasms, particularly in children.

Interstitial irradiation versus interstitial thermoradiotherapy for supratentorial malignant gliomas: a comparative survival analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the survival of two groups of patients with supratentorial malignant gliomas who were treated on two sequential protocols with either interstitial thermoradiotherapy or with interstitial irradiation without hyperthermia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1988-1992, patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme were treated at the University of Arizona on a Phase I/II protocol of interstitial thermoradiotherapy with ferro-magnetic seeds. The treatment protocol consisted of debulking surgery, a course of external beam radiotherapy and hyperthermia given immediately before and after brachytherapy. The survival of patients so treated was compared with that of a similar group of patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy alone at the Barrows Neurological Institute between 1982-1990.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with primary tumors treated at the time of initial presentation with thermoradiotherapy were compared with a control group of 37 patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy alone. All primary patients were followed for a minimum of 34 months post implant. Multivariate analysis based on proportional hazards models showed that hyperthermia (p = 0.027), patient age (p < or = 0.00001) and histology (anaplastic astrocytoma vs. glioblastoma multiforme, p = 0.0017) were the only factors significantly associated with survival in this data set. From the fitted model, the hazard of dying when treated with hyperthermia was .53 times (95% confidence intervals 0.29-0.94) than that of the control group. In addition, we treated a small group of patients with recurrent tumors (13 with brachytherapy alone, and eight with thermoradiotherapy) and found no survival difference (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Within the constraints of the selection factors and the different treatment parameters used in these studies, we conclude that an interstitial thermoradiotherapy boost confers a statistically significant survival benefit to patients with primary high grade gliomas when compared to interstitial brachytherapy alone.