Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil with or without estrogenic recruitment in women with metastatic breast cancer

A Randomized Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Estrogenic Recruitment in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

The present phase III trial was carried out to verify whether a kinetic recruitment induced by low doses of diethylstilbes-trol (DES) could increase the killing efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One-hundred and seventeen untreated patients with locally advanced breast cancer (stage IIIA/IIIB) were randomized to receive 3 courses of primary chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 i.v.), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v.) and fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 i.v.) (CAF) on day 1, or DES-CAF (DES, 1 mg orally days 1-3, CAF on day 4). The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. The patients who achieved an objective response were submitted to mastectomy followed by 3 courses of CAF alternated with 3 courses of CMF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 i.v.; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2 i.v.; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 i.v.), with or without DES. The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of clinical and pathologic features. There was no significant difference in response rates to induction chemotherapy between the two treatment arms (objective response rate, 63.3% for CAF and 56.1% for DES-CAF). Median overall survival was 49 and 47 months and median progression-free survival was 24 and 21 months for CAF and DES-CAF patients, respectively. Toxicity was not significantly different in the two groups, with the exception of leukopenia: DES chemotherapy was significantly more myelotoxic than the standard treatment, which resulted in a significant reduction in the actual dose intensity. In spite of the attractive experimental evidence, we conclude that so far there is no clinical advantage in the combination of estrogen and chemotherapy. Further research is needed to investigate different schedules of chemotherapy and hor-mones, or to test the possibility of combining various mitogens.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group--achievements and perspectives

The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) was founded in 1977 as a regional cooperative group to allow cancer patients in the upper Midwest of the United States to gain access to clinical trials in oncology by establishing a network of community oncology practices with one academic research base, the Mayo Clinic. Since then, the NCCTG has grown into an international cooperative group with 43 members in 33 US states and Canada. This article details 30 years of achievements of the NCCTG, including important scientific contributions from disease-specific and treatment modality committees, the cancer control program, patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life research, and biostatisticians that support the NCCTG's specific aims: to improve the duration and quality of life of cancer patients, to enhance our understanding of the biological consequences of cancer and its treatment, and to improve methods for clinical trial conduct.

Current limits of knowledge in adjuvant and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: the need for more clinical research

Adjuvant endocrine therapy following surgical resection of early, endocrine sensitive breast cancer has proven benefits in reducing risk of recurrence and death, as demonstrated in many mature well controlled clinical trials. The introduction of new endocrine therapies as potential alternatives to tamoxifen or ovarian ablation and the incorporation of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy into the overall management strategy continue to provide exciting challenges for clinical research. In this article the focus is on as yet unanswered questions pertinent to adjuvant or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. In the process, we broadly outline the current limits of knowledge as we understand it. Many relevant and current clinical trials are ongoing and a list of these with contact details or references are provided. Definitive data is urgently needed in many areas and, when available, will provide important evidence on which the management of breast cancer patients in future can be based. Participation in relevant clinical trials is vital for future progress.

Value of estrogenic recruitment before chemotherapy: first randomized trial in primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

Several preclinical studies showed that short-term pretreatment of breast cancer cells with estrogens can increase the antitumor efficacy of different cytotoxic drugs. Some early clinical studies in patients with advanced breast cancer did seem to support these findings. Therefore, the efficacy of estrogenic recruitment followed by chemotherapy was compared with that of chemotherapy alone in a randomized phase III study in women with lymph node-positive primary breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred twenty-eight patients with stage II/IIIA breast cancer who were younger than 66 years of age were randomly allocated to chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or FAC plus pretreatment with ethinyl estradiol (EE(2)). FAC (500, 50, and 500 mg/m(2), respectively) was administered intravenously once every 4 weeks for four cycles. EE(2) (0.5 mg) was administered orally, both 24 hours and immediately preceding FAC chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patient and tumor characteristics and chemotherapy dosages were comparable in both treatment groups. Of 318 assessable patients, with a median follow-up of 6.8 years, 177 patients had a relapse and 127 died. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to relapse-free, local recurrence-free, and overall survival according to univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, menopausal status, tumor size, grade, number of positive nodes, and steroid-receptor status. The power for the detection of an increase of 50% in the median relapse-free survival was 80%.

CONCLUSION

Estrogenic recruitment of breast cancer cells before FAC chemotherapy did not influence the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/IIIA breast cancer patients after a follow-up of 6.8 years.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell reconstitution for solid tumors

High-dose chemotherapy--in conjunction with the transplantation of either mononuclear cells harvested from the marrow or CD 34+ cells harvested from the peripheral blood--has proved effective in curing certain patients with leukemia, lymphoma, and, to a lesser extent, multiple myeloma. Though the CD 34+ therapy is a relatively new treatment and the mononuclear cell therapy is more standard, both have been successfully used to reconstitute lethally damaged hematopoietic stem cells. Allogeneic transplants have been more effective than autologous transplants against tumors, but they also pose a greater hazard of death from complications, graft-versus-host disease, and infections. More currently, this approach has been used in patients with certain solid tumors, either in a metastatic or recurrent disease setting or as an adjuvant to surgery and/or standard doses of chemotherapy in patients with a known high risk of recurrence. Unfortunately, the majority of the studies about the impact of this therapy have been small and nonrandomized against standard therapy, and they have encompassed diverse populations of patients. This makes comparisons with contemporary standard--dose approaches--already problematic from a statistical point of view--even more dangerous because of the dissimilarity of the groups being compared. Particularly in the high-risk adjuvant setting, data suggest that those patients that meet the eligibility criteria for high-dose therapy and transplantation exhibit the prognostic factors for a positive outcome. When one compares these results with those of a more heterogeneous group of patients treated with conventional therapy, the conclusion might be drawn that high-dose therapy is superior to standard therapy, when a longer follow-up of the patients in the study will show this to be untrue. Thus there is a plea from clinicians and physicians conducting trials for prospective, randomized trials that would allow a fair comparison between high-dose therapy in combination with transplant procedures and a more conventional, standard chemotherapy, which is often less toxic and definitely less expensive. This article reviews the data for transplantation in four tumors: breast cancer, ovarian cancer, small-cell lung cancer, and germ cell testis cancer. There is such a small number of randomized trials that an attempt must be made to compare these small high-dose therapy studies with similar, though not identical, large studies of conventional therapy. This article attempts to make those comparisons, and several conclusions are drawn, which are detailed below. First, few data support the use of high-dose chemotherapy in any patient with recurrent and drug-resistant breast cancer or ovarian cancer. Similarly, few data support the use of high-dose approaches for patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer. For patients with metastatic breast cancer that has responded completely to conventional chemotherapy, no data suggest a survival advantage for the immediate consolidation of that response with high-dose chemotherapy. The only trial addressing this issue found that immediate transplantation led to a better disease-free survival rate, but overall survival, as compared with that of patients who received transplants at relapse, was not affected, and the study did not address the issue of the relative merits of conventional chemotherapy in either case. The only study of high-dose versus conventional chemotherapy was statistically underpowered, and it showed poorer-than-anticipated outcomes in the patients who received conventional therapy. Ongoing or recently completed trials will, it is hoped, address the many unanswered questions in this area. For patients with high-risk, non-metastatic breast cancer, no completed and analyzed phase III randomized studies address the relative merits of conventional versus high-dose therapy. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Changes in tumor proliferation of rectal cancer induced by preoperative 5-fluorouracil and irradiation

PURPOSE

This study examines the effect of 5-fluorouracil administration during preoperative irradiation on rectal cancer tumor proliferation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and fifty-three patients with locally advanced rectal cancer received 45 to 50 Gy of preoperative irradiation with (103 patients) and without (50 patients) concurrent 5-fluorouracil, followed by surgery. Pretreatment tumor biopsies and postirradiation surgical specimens were scored for proliferative activity by assaying the extent of Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining and the number of mitoses per ten high-powered fields. Postirradiation specimens were also assessed for downstaging.

RESULTS

Although 5-fluorouracil did not improve downstaging rates, marked decreases in the activity of all three markers of proliferation (mitotic counts, Ki-67, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining) were seen in rectal cancers of patients receiving the drug. No significant decreases were noted in patients undergoing irradiation only.

CONCLUSION

The addition of 5-fluorouracil to preoperative irradiation resulted in a more complete inactivation of the proliferating population. Frequency of downstaging, however, was unaffected. Thus, the quiescent cell population appears to represent a substantial barrier to further downstaging. New treatment strategies should be aimed at controlled recruitment of quiescent tumor cells at the time of irradiation.

Mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (NFL) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: randomized comparison to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) and attempts to improve efficacy by adding paclitaxel

The combination of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2 i.v. days 1-3) and leucovorin (300 mg i.v. days 1-3) is an active and well-tolerated regimen for metastatic breast cancer. We compared this regimen to a standard CMF regimen (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 day 1; 5FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) in a randomized, phase II study. One hundred and twenty-eight women receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were treated. NFL produced higher response rates (45% vs. 26%) and longer remissions (9 months vs. 6 months) than did CMF; overall survival was not different (19 months vs. 16 months). Both regimens were well tolerated. In an attempt to improve efficacy, we added paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 i.v. 1-h infusion) to the NFL regimen. Although this regimen was active (51% response rate in first-second-line treatment), myelosuppression was greater than expected. These results confirm the utility of NFL as an active, well-tolerated regimen for the palliative treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Estrogen receptors and cell proliferation in breast cancer

Most of the actions of estrogens on the normal and abnormal mammary cells are mediated via estrogen receptors (ERs), including control of cell proliferation; however, there are also alternative pathways of estrogen action not involving ERs. Estrogens control several genes and proteins that induce the cells to enter the cell cycle (protooncogenes, growth factors); estrogens also act on proteins directly involved in the control of the cell cycle (cyclins), and moreover, estrogens stimulate the response of negative cell cycle regulators (p53, BRCA1). The next challenge for researchers is elucidating the integration of the interrelationships of the complex pathways involved in the control of cell proliferation. This brief review focuses on the mechanisms of estrogen action to control cell proliferation and the clinical implications in breast cancer. (Trends Endocrinol Metab 1997;8:313-321). (c) 1997, Elsevier Science Inc.

Evaluation of intravenous 6-thioguanine as first-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer

6-Thioguanine (6-TG) is a purine analog that has marked variability in plasma concentration after oral administration. Following the development of a multiple-day i.v. regimen, we performed a phase II trial of this agent as first-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. Forty-one patients with measurable (31 patients) or evaluable (10 patients) disease were entered into this trial. 6-TG was administered i.v. over a 10 min period daily for 5 consecutive days, with a planned cycle length of 35 days. The daily dosage level was 55 mg/m2 in the first 15 patients, but this was increased to 65 mg/m2 in the remaining patients due to inadequate myelosuppression at the lower dose. Six patients, all with measurable disease, achieved a complete response (CR) (two patients) or a partial response (PR) (four patients). Three responses occurred at the 55 mg/m2 level and three at the 65 mg/m2 level. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the true response rate among patients with measurable disease was 6-39%. The median time to progression was 140 days and median survival time was 460 days. The regimen was well tolerated. We conclude that 6-TG, as given in this study, has limited activity as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Chemotherapy with or without estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer. A randomized trial of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO)

BACKGROUND

This phase III study was carried out to verify whether a kinetic recruitment induced with low doses of diethylstilbestrol (DES) could increase the antitumor activity of chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred fifty-eight women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sqm i.v., epidoxorubicin 60 mg/sqm i.v. and fluorouracil 600 mg/ sqm i.v. (CEF) on day 1 or DES-CEF (diethylstilbestrol 1 mg orally days 1-3 CEF on day 4) every 21 days. Patients were treated until progression or, if responsive, for a maximum of 10 courses.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two treatment arms in response rates (51.3% to CEF and 49.6% for DES-CEF); median progression-free survival (9.4 months for CEF and 11 months for DES-CEF group) or median overall survival (17.3 and 20 months for CEF and DES-CEF arms, respectively). Non-hematological toxicities were superimposable in the two arms, while DES-chemotherapy was more myelotoxic.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial confirms that chemotherapy preceded by estrogenic recruitment is still in an experimental phase and that, at present, it has no role in clinical practice. Further research is needed to test the possibility of combining different mitogens in the light of new information about breast cancer cell growth.

[Hormone replacement therapy in menopause and cancers]

The long term outcome analysis of estrogen replacement therapy shows that the carcinologic risk is far more inferior than the osseous and cardiovascular risks of which the prevention is ensured by estrogen. In the same way, the quality of life improvement during the years following menopause is important. For a female population without personal risk of breast cancer, the substitutive hormone therapy offers numerous advantages which have been for a long time refused to women with previously treated breast cancer. Any dogmatic behaviour is presently justified. On the contrary, the hormonal replacement therapy requires beforehand an analysis as exact as possible of the risks of its prescription as of its non-prescription and a responsibility taking shared between the physician and his patient. The progresses of the molecular biology and the expansion of randomized trials will permit with no doubt to recognize more easily for each patient, even the one who would have been previously treated for a breast cancer, the respective impact of carcinologic, cardiovascular and osseous risks.