Cancer of unknown primary site

Bone metastatic cancer of unknown primary at initial presentation

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a challenging malignancy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognosis of bone metastatic CUP using the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

From the SEER database, we identified 1908 patients with bone metastatic CUP at initial presentation between 2010 and 2018. Histology was subdivided following International Classification of Diseases for Oncology codes as Adenocarcinoma, Squamous cell, Neuroendocrine, or Carcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS). Cox proportional hazard modeling was applied using factors of age, sex, ethnicity, histological subtype, and therapeutic intervention.

RESULTS

Among the 1908 patients, histology was Neuroendocrine in 240 patients, Squamous cell in 201 patients, Adenocarcinoma in 810 patients and NOS in 657 patients. In each subtype, patients tended to be predominantly male and white. Chemotherapy was introduced for 28% of patients and radiation for 34% in the entire cohort. Survival in patients with bone metastatic CUP was unfavorable, with a median survival of 2 months. Among the histological subtypes, Adenocarcinoma showed shorter survival than the other groups. In addition, treatment interventions such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy prolonged survival, particularly for Squamous cell, Adenocarcinoma and NOS, but not for Neuroendocrine.

DISCUSSION

Bone metastatic CUP showed extremely poor prognosis, but treatment interventions such as chemotherapy and radiation generally offered survival benefits. Further randomized clinical research is needed to confirm the present results.

Case Report: Combined pembrolizumab, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin therapy were remarkably effective in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary

Background

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a malignant tumor without a known primary lesion with a frequency of 3-5%. It can be divided into favorable and unfavorable prognosis subsets. While recommended treatments are available for the former group, there is no established treatment for the latter. Here, we report the effective treatment of a 32-year-old woman with p16-positive squamous cell CUP with pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin therapy.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old woman presented with metastatic lesions in the liver, lung, bone, cervical region, abdominal region, and pelvic lymph nodes. She was diagnosed with p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin. The patient received pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin therapy, which markedly reduced the metastasis and improved her Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status after two courses.

Conclusion

This case report highlights the potential of pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin therapy for treating CUP with an unfavorable prognosis. p16 positivity is worth examining for squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin, and if present, this therapy should be considered a promising treatment option.

Microsatellite Instability-high-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary Origin with a Long-term Survival after Surgery Alone

An 80-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for a thorough examination of enlarged lymph nodes on the lesser curvature of the stomach. Upon suspicion of malignant lymphoma, the patient underwent open lymphadenectomy and was diagnosed with lymph node metastasis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with microsatellite instability-high cancer of unknown primary origin. Surgical removal of the affected lymph nodes achieved full remission. Chemotherapy was considered in case of recurrence or identification of the primary site. Recurrence has not occurred in three years since the surgery. However, a long-term survival without chemotherapy is rare.

Site-specific therapy in cancers of unknown primary site: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is a term applied to characterize pathologically confirmed metastatic cancer with unknown primary tumor origin. It remains uncertain whether patients with CUP benefit from site-specific therapy guided by molecular profiling.

Patients and methods

A systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and of conference abstracts from January 1976 to January 2021 was performed to identify studies investigating the efficacy of site-specific therapy on patients with CUP. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Eligible studies were weighted and pooled for meta-analysis. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed to compare the efficacy of site-specific therapy with empiric therapy in patients with CUP. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results

Five studies comprising 1114 patients were identified, of which 454 patients received site-specific therapy, and 660 patients received empiric therapy. Our meta-analysis revealed that site-specific therapy was not significantly associated with improved PFS [HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.17, P = 0.534] and OS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55-1.03, P = 0.069), compared with empiric therapy. However, during subgroup analysis significantly improved OS was associated with site-specific therapy in the high-accuracy predictive assay subgroup (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.81, P = 0.008) compared with the low accuracy predictive assay subgroup (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.15, P = 0.509). Furthermore, compared with patients with less responsive tumor types, more survival benefit from site-specific therapy was found in patients with more responsive tumors (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.97, P = 0.037).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that site-specific therapy is not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes; however, it might benefit patients with CUP with responsive tumor types.

•

Studies evaluating the role of site-specific therapy guided by molecular profiling in CUP provided contradictory results.

•

Site-specific therapy is not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes in the overall CUP population.

•

Molecularly defined site-specific therapy may improve OS only when high-accuracy assays assign CUP to responsive tumor types.

A Case Report of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary That Metastasized to an Inguinal Lymph Node

The term carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) refers to a malignant tumor whose histology suggests strongly that it is a metastasis, yet the primary lesion is unknown despite sufficient whole body evaluation at the time of examination. CUP has similar incidences in men and women and the average age at diagnosis is 60 years. While its overall incidence varies depending on the report, it generally accounts for 1-5% of all cancers. Thus, it is rare. We encountered a case of squamous cell carcinoma of the inguinal region that seemed to be a metastasis and for which we could not find the primary lesion. This case is reported here along with a literature review on CUP to increase awareness of this rare lesion.

"Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary" or "Primary Metastatic Cancer"?

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an umbrella term used to classify a heterogeneous group of metastatic cancers based on the absence of an identifiable primary tumor. Clinically, CUPs are characterized by a set of distinct features comprising early metastatic dissemination in an atypical pattern, an aggressive clinical course, poor response to empiric chemotherapy and, consequently, a short life expectancy. Two opposing strategies to change the dismal prognosis for the better are pursued. On the one hand, following the traditional tissue-gnostic approach, more and more sophisticated tissue-of-origin (TOO) classifier assays are employed to push identification of the putative primary to its limits with the clear intent of allowing tumor-site specific treatment. However, robust evidence supporting its routine clinical use is still lacking, notably with two recent randomized clinical trials failing to show a patient benefit of TOO-prediction based site-specific treatment over empiric chemotherapy in CUP. On the other hand, with regards to a tissue-agnostic strategy, precision medicine approaches targeting actionable genomic alterations have already transformed the treatment for many known tumor types. Yet, an unmet need remains for well-designed clinical trials to scrutinize its potential role in CUP beyond anecdotal case reports. In the absence of practice changing results, we believe that the emphasis on finding the presumed unknown primary tumor at all costs, implicit in the term CUP, has biased recent research in the field. Focusing on the distinct clinical features shared by all CUPs, we advocate adopting the term primary metastatic cancer (PMC) to denominate a distinct cancer entity instead. In our view, PMC should be considered the archetype of metastatic disease and as such, despite accounting for a mere 2–3% of malignancies, unraveling the mechanisms at play goes beyond improving the prognosis of patients with PMC and promises to greatly enhance our understanding of the metastatic process and carcinogenesis across all cancer types.

Multiple Bilateral Choroidal Metastatic Tumors from a Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Site

PURPOSE

To report one case of multiple and bilateral choroidal tumors from a poorly differentiated small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary.

METHODS

The case of a 30-years-old white female who developed multiple and bilateral choroidal tumors from a poorly differentiated small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary is presented.

RESULTS

The patient had a disseminated disease and died 6 months after. The oncologic work-up, including physical examination, laboratory and radiographic study, fails to identify the primary site.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraocular involvement from a poorly differentiated small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary has not yet reported. We describe this case together with a review of the literature.

Perceptions of cancer of unknown primary site: a national survey of Australian medical oncologists

BACKGROUND

Despite being the sixth most common cause of cancer death in Australia, cancer of unknown primary (CUP) site remains poorly understood.

AIMS

To describe practices relating to the diagnosis, investigation, classification, communication and management of CUP among medical oncologists.

METHODS

We invited all members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia to participate in a national, anonymous online survey about CUP. The survey collected data regarding diagnosis acceptance, diagnostic tests, treatment protocols and communication practices around the diagnosis of CUP.

RESULTS

Three hundred and two oncologists were invited and 86 (28%) completed the survey. Eighty (93%) respondents were directly involved in the assessment of patients with CUP. Eighty-five (99%) respondents were prepared to make a diagnosis of CUP if, after appropriate diagnostic tests, the primary location could not be ascertained. Eighty-three percent would assign a primary site to obtain Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule funding of medical therapy. Sixty-two percent did not have a specific treatment protocol designed for CUP. The majority of oncologists used serum tumour markers and computed tomography scans in the initial work-up, while 43% indicated they would use a positron emission tomography scan in the majority of cases. The majority would arrange mammography in female patients. Thematic analysis of responses to open-ended questions about how CUP is described identified little consistency in the language being used.

CONCLUSION

The approach to diagnosis, investigation and management of CUP by medical oncologists in Australia is variable. Many preferred to estimate the primary site and treat accordingly. Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule restrictions may encourage the practice of 'best guessing'.

Development and validation of a gene expression tumour classifier for cancer of unknown primary

Accurate identification of the primary tumour in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is required for effective treatment selection and improved patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a gene expression tumour classifier and integrate it with histopathology to identify the likely site of origin in CUP.RNA was extracted from 450 formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples of known origin comprising 18 tumour groups. Whole genome expression analysis was performed using a bead-based array. Classification of the tumours made use of a binary support vector machine, together with recursive feature elimination. A hierarchical tumour classifier was developed and incorporated with conventional histopathology to identify the origins of metastatic tumours.The classifier demonstrated an accuracy of 88% for correctly predicting the tumour type on a validation set of known tumours (n = 94). For CUP samples (n = 49) having a final clinical diagnosis, the classifier improved the accuracy of histology alone for both single and multiple predictions. Furthermore, where histology alone could not suggest any specific diagnosis, the classifier was able to correctly predict the primary site of origin.We demonstrate the integration of gene expression profiling with conventional histopathology to aid the investigation of CUP.

Pathological investigation of vertebral tumor metastasis from unknown primaries--a systematic analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic analysis was conducted to investigate pathological diagnosis of vertebral tumor metastasis with unknown primaries.

METHODS

Clinical studies conducted to pathologically investigate vertebral tumor metastasis were identified using a predefined search strategy. Pooled diagnosis (PD) of each pathological confirmation was calculated.

RESULTS

For vertebral tumor metastasis, 5 clinical studies which included 762 patients were considered eligible for inclusion. Systematic analysis suggested that, for all patients with vertebral tumor metastasis, dominant PD was pathologically confirmed with lung cancer in 21.7% (165/762), with breast cancer in 26.6% (203/762) and with prostate cancer in 19.2% (146/762) . Other diagnosis that could be confirmed included lymphoma, multiple myeloma, renal cancer, for example, in this cohort of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This systemic analysis suggested that breast, lung and prostate lesions could be the most common pathological types of cancer for vertebral tumor metastasis formunknown primaries, and other common diagnoses could include lymphoma, multiple myeloma, renal cancer.

Indolent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary in the intrathoracic lymph node: a case report and review of the literatures

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma from a cancer of unknown primary (CUP) affecting the intrathoracic lymph node is very rare. We reported a case of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in the hilar and interlobar lymph node from a patient with CUP and reviewed the associated literature. Abnormal mass in the right hilar area was incidentally detected. A chest computed tomography scan showed a 2.5-cm diameter mass in the right hilum that had changed little in size for 3 years. The patient underwent a right pneumonectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. A metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in the hilar and interlobar lymph nodes without a primary lung or other lesion was diagnosed. The patient received adjuvant chemotherapy for a diagnosis of T0N1M0 lung cancer.

The Ability to Diagnose Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Definitively Using Novel Branched DNA-Enhanced Albumin RNA In Situ Hybridization Technology

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) often is a diagnosis determined by exclusion. Distinguishing ICC from other metastatic adenocarcinomas based on histopathologic or immunohistochemical analysis often is difficult and requires an extensive workup. This study aimed to determine whether albumin, whose expression is restricted to the liver, has potential as a biomarker for ICC using a novel and highly sensitive RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) platform.

METHODS

Modified branched DNA probes were developed for albumin RNA ISH. The study evaluated 467 patient samples of primary and metastatic lesions.

RESULTS

Of the 467 samples evaluated, 83 were ICCs, 42 were hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 332 were nonhepatic carcinomas including tumors arising from the perihilar region and bile duct, pancreas, stomach, esophagus, colon, breast, ovary, endometrium, kidney, and urinary bladder. Albumin RNA ISH was highly sensitive for cancers of liver origin, staining positive in 82 (99 %) of 83 ICCs and in 42 HCCs (100 %). Perihilar and distal bile duct carcinomas as well as carcinomas arising at other sites tested negative for albumin. Notably, 6 (22 %) of 27 intrahepatic tumors previously diagnosed as carcinomas of undetermined origin tested positive for albumin.

CONCLUSIONS

Albumin RNA ISH is a sensitive and highly specific diagnostic tool for distinguishing ICC from metastatic adenocarcinoma to the liver or carcinoma of unknown origin. Albumin RNA ISH could replace the extensive diagnostic workup, leading to timely confirmation of the ICC diagnosis. Additionally, the assay could serve as a guide to distinguish ICC from perihilar adenocarcinoma.

[Radiological diagnostics in CUP syndrome]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Imaging plays an essential role in the therapeutic management of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) patients for localizing the primary tumor, for the identification of tumor entities for which a dedicated therapy regimen is available and for the characterization of clinicopathological subentities that direct the subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Modalities include conventional x-ray, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound as well as positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and MRI-PET.

PERFORMANCE

In whole body imaging CT has a high sensitivity for tumor entities which frequently present as a metastasized cancer illness. According to the current literature CT is diagnostic in 86% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, in 36% of patients with colon carcinoma and in 74% of patients with lung carcinoma. Additionally a meta-analysis showed that for patients with squamous cell carcinoma and cervical lymph node metastases a positive diagnosis was possible in 22% of the cases using CT, in 36% using MRI and in 28-57% using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT ((18)F-FDG PET-CT). In addition, MRI plays an important role in the localization of primary occult tumors (e.g. breast and prostate) because of its high soft tissue contrast and options for functional imaging.

ACHIEVEMENTS

At the beginning of the diagnostic algorithm stands the search for a possible primary tumor and CT of the neck, thorax and abdomen is most frequently used for whole body staging. Subsequent organ-specific imaging examinations follow, e.g. mammography in women with axillary lymphadenopathy. For histological and immunohistochemical characterization of tumor tissue, imaging is also applied to identify the most accessible and representative tumor manifestation for biopsy. Tumor biopsy may be guided by CT, MRI or ultrasound and MRI also plays a central role in the localization of primary occult tumors because of superior soft tissue contrast and options for functional imaging (perfusion, diffusion), e.g. investigation of breast carcinoma or prostate carcinoma.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Whole body staging stands at the beginning of the diagnostic algorithm in CUP syndrome to localize a potential primary tumor. Clinically, contrast-enhanced CT of the neck, thorax and abdomen is frequently applied; however, many studies have demonstrated augmented sensitivity of (18)F-FDG PET-CT for the detection of primary tumors and metastatic tumor manifestations.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene analysis as a useful tool for identifying primary unknown metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

A 55-year-old woman was admitted for an evaluation of a mediastinal mass, bilateral cervical lymphadenopathy and a left breast tumor. Although pathology revealed a diagnosis of breast cancer, the cervical lymph nodes differed from the breast lesion. An anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene analysis revealed ALK rearrangement in the cervical lymph nodes only, which were therefore diagnosed as reflective of metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma. The mediastinal tumor was also diagnosed as an ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma based on its therapeutic response. ALK gene analyses can be used to identify primary lesions in patients with cancers of unknown primary sites.

The role of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary

Purpose

Carcinoma of unknown primary is one of the ten most frequent cancers worldwide. Its median survival time is less than 10 months. Detecting primary tumour locations and/or occult metastatic lesions may inform definitive treatment and improve patients’ prognosis. We aimed to determine: (1) the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography; (2) its detection rate of primary tumour locations and occult metastases and (3) factors associated with improved survival times.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all cases in the West of Scotland for the period 1 December 2007 to 31 May 2011 that met all our selection criteria: (1) diagnosis of carcinoma of unknown primary; (2) a thorough but negative ‘work-up’ and (3) 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography report. Statistical methods included frequencies, Kaplan-Meier graphs and log-rank tests to compare survival times.

Results

18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography detected primary tumour sites in 19/51 (37.3%) and occult metastases in 28/51 (54.9%) of eligible patients. Its sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 79.2%, 70.4% and 74.5%, respectively; 20/51 (39.2%) patients died during the study period with a median survival of 8.4 months (range 21.4, SD ± 6.2). The number of metastatic locations was strongly associated with survival ( p = 0.002), but detection of a primary tumour site ( p = 0.174) or histopathology ( p = 0.301) was not.

Conclusion

18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography detected occult metastatic sites in the majority and a primary cancer location in a substantial minority of patients. Our results were comparable with international literature and may indicate that 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography have an early role to improve the accuracy of cancer staging and to optimise carcinoma of unknown primary management.

The added value of18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography in patients with neck lymph node metastases from an unknown primary malignancy

Background:

The search for a primary malignancy in patients with a metastatic cervical lymph node is challenging yet ultimately of utmost clinical importance. This study evaluated the efficacy of positron emission tomography computed tomography in detecting the occult primary, within the context of a tertiary referral centre head and neck cancer multidisciplinary team tumour board meeting.

Methods:

Thirty-two patients (23 men and 9 women; mean and median age, 61 years) with a metastatic cervical lymph node of unknown primary origin, after clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging, underwent positron emission tomography computed tomography.

Results:

The primary tumour detection rate was 50 per cent (16/32). Positron emission tomography computed tomography had a sensitivity of 94 per cent (16/17) and a specificity of 67 per cent (10/15). Combining these results with those of 10 earlier studies of similar patients gave an overall detection rate of 37 per cent.

Conclusion:

Positron emission tomography computed tomography has become an important imaging modality. To date, it has the highest primary tumour detection rate, for head and neck cancer patients presenting with cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary.

Cancer of unknown primary: a population-based analysis of temporal change and socioeconomic disparities

Background:

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is the fourth most common cause of cancer death. With advanced diagnostics and treatments, we investigated the proportion of cancers diagnosed as CUP, treatment outcomes and association with socioeconomic disparities.

Methods:

We analysed trends in CUP diagnosis and outcome within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry between 1973 and 2008.

Results:

The percentage of all cancers diagnosed as CUP has decreased over time comprising <2% of cancers since 2007. A higher proportion of CUP was diagnosed in the elderly, females, blacks and residents of less affluent or less educated counties. Median survival of all CUP patients was 3 months, with no improvement over time. The 5-year survival significantly improved in those with squamous histology (squamous cell carcinoma; SCC) but only marginally in non-SCC. Factors associated with a longer survival on multivariate analysis included white race; female; <65 years old; most recent decade at diagnosis; SCC; married; a histological diagnosis; and treatment with radiotherapy (all P<0.001). Despite the improvement in survival with radiotherapy, its use was less frequent in females and blacks.

Conclusion:

The percentage of cancers diagnosed as CUP is decreasing but prognosis remains poor, particularly in non-SCC CUP. However, significant socioeconomic disparities exist in diagnosis and survival, suggesting inequalities in access to diagnostic investigations and treatment.

[Cerebral metastasis of a "ghost" bronchopulmonary tumor]

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is the metastasis of epithelial malignancy whose origin remains unknown. Bronchial carcinoma is the most common cause (45%), however, in more than a quarter of cases, its origin is unknown and the choice of therapy often justifies a histopathological precision brought by the immuno-histochemistry. We present a rare case of cerebral metastasis, revealing an unknown lung cancer after a comprehensive review. This is a patient aged 53 years, chronic smoker, who presented a year and a half ago a sudden loss of consciousness with afebrile tonic-clonic seizure of spontaneous resolution. Clinical examination was unremarkable. Brain imaging by MRI has objectified the presence of two parietal tissue formations, which stereotactic biopsy with histological and immuno-histochemical favored metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma origin. An etiologic in search of the primitive lung remained negative (chest X-ray of face, chest CT and bronchoscopy with sampling upper gastrointestinal endoscopy). The rest of the etiologic, looking for another primitive, remained negative. The diagnosis of a bronchogenic carcinoma with brain metastasis is therefore withheld. The patient received two brain radiotherapies (gamma kniff) with regression of the two nodular formations. We have not given specific treatment and have called for very close monitoring of the patient who remained stable after 18 months. Through this observation, we stress the interest of the histology and immuno-histochemistry of carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) to the diagnosis, guide therapy and determine prognosis.

Evaluation of prognostic factors and the role of chemotherapy in unfavorable carcinoma of unknown primary site: a 10-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

Carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) has a poor prognosis and the prognostic factors in these patients are not well established. Furthermore, there are no selection criteria for patients who should benefit from chemotherapy.

METHODS

The medical records of 179 CUP patients who were treated at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Factors associated with survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences between the groups with and without palliative chemotherapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed multiple prognostic factors, including performance status, lung metastasis, number of metastatic organs, serum albumin, corrected serum calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sodium, and cholesterol levels, palliative chemotherapy, and white blood cell and lymphocyte counts. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status < 2, serum albumin level ≥ 3.5 g/dl, corrected serum calcium level < 10.7 mg/dl, single metastatic organ, and palliative chemotherapy were independent factors of better prognosis. Patients with better performance status, higher serum albumin, and lower serum LDH levels had significantly greater benefit from palliative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Certain patients with unfavorable CUP will have better survival. Identification of patients with unfavorable CUP who could benefit from palliative chemotherapy warrants future prospective studies.

Pathohistological diagnosis and differential diagnosis

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare aggressive tumour arising from mesothelial cells of the pleural and peritoneal cavity including pericardium and tunica vaginalis testis. Malignant mesothelioma occurs predominantly in men (>90%). Asbestos exposure is the best known and evaluated risk factor with a long latency period between exposure and onset of malignant mesothelioma ranging from 15 to 60 years. Exposure to erionite leads to higher incidences of mesothelioma and play an important role in environmental exposure (Turkey). Other possible risk factors are radiation, recurrent pleuritis/peritonitis and simian virus 40 (SV 40).Malignant pleural mesothelioma is most common, whereas malignant peritoneal mesothelioma accounts only for 6-10%. Infrequent sites of origin are the pericardium and tunica vaginalis in 1-2%.Malignant mesothelioma shows either diffuse growth pattern or occurs as a localised tumour mass. Diffuse type represents an aggressive tumour with poor prognosis and is incurable in most cases.According to the WHO classification, three histological subtypes are distinguished: epithelioid, sarcomatoid and biphasic malignant mesothelioma.Rare variants are desmoplastic type, a subtype of sarcomatoid mesothelioma, undifferentiated type and deciduoid type. Epithelioid type is the most frequent one, but biphasic malignant mesothelioma occurs in 30%. Pure sarcomatoid or biphasic type is seen less frequently in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma than in its pleural counterpart.Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma is a generally non-invasive mesothelioma with low malignant potential that arises mostly in females in the peritoneal cavity. Histological type is an important prognostic marker. Longest survival is seen in patients with epithelioid malignant mesothelioma. Sarcomatoid subtype has the worst prognosis.Malignant mesothelioma shows macroscopical and microscopical similarities to benign lesions and other malignancies. Therefore, reactive mesothelial proliferations on the one hand and secondary tumours resembling mesothelial cells as well as benign or rare mesothelial tumours on the other hand have to be distinguished. Additional immunohistochemistry is essential in histopathological assessment using a marker panel of antibodies.

Lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary in the upper and middle neck: Impact of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging for detection of the primary tumor and its impact on treatment planning in patients presenting with cancer of unknown primary and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)-positive cervical lymph nodes of the upper and middle neck.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 18 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven SCC involving lymph nodes of the upper and middle neck region and negative conventional diagnostic procedures with regard to the location of the primary. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT according to a standard procedure in search for the primary, unidentified tumor.

RESULTS

In none of the patients FDG-PET/CT was able to indicate a primary tumor localization. Although FDG-PET/CT did identify all sites of known lymph node involvement, neither additional sites of lymph node involvement nor sites of distant metastases were identified. Accordingly, FDG-PET/CT did not impact patient treatment planning.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, including patients suffering from lymph node metastases by an SCC of unknown primary in the upper and middle neck, FDG-PET/CT was unable to identify a primary tumor. In addition, FDG-PET/CT did not modify the treatment planning in any of the patients studied.

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the hypopharynx: a case report

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the hypopharynx is extremely rare. A 59-year-old man complaining of swollen right cervical lymph node was admitted to our hospital. Although computed tomography, upper endoscopy, and positron emission tomography scan were performed, the primary lesion was unknown. Bilateral neck lymph node dissection was performed and diagnosed as metastasis of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Sixteen months after the first operation, computed tomography scan revealed multiple liver metastases. There was no another metastatic lesion, and hepatectomy with negative margin was performed. Three months after the second operation, a small tumor of the hypopharynx was detected by upper endoscopy, and biopsy revealed neuroendocrine carcinoma. Concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin + docetaxel) and radiotherapy (60 Gy) were carried out. This therapy was highly effective, and primary lesion disappeared. After the chemoradiotherapy, lung metastasis and bone metastasis emerged and treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin + irinotecan). These therapies were also effective, but multiple liver metastases appeared. The patient died 39 months after the first surgery. Although neuroendocrine carcinoma is a high-grade malignancy which metastasizes easily, combined treatment strategy may be useful for these patients. We have here reported, with bibliographic consideration, a case in which multimodal treatment was employed for primary hypopharyngeal neuroendocrine carcinoma with distant metastases.

Biopsy of vertebral tumour metastasis for diagnosing unknown primaries

PURPOSE

To examine patients with vertebral tumour metastasis using transpedicular biopsy for diagnosing unknown primary tumours.

METHODS

13 men and 8 women aged 41 to 80 (mean, 61) years with vertebral tumour metastasis of unknown primary origin underwent transpedicular biopsy of the affected vertebra.

RESULTS

The origins of the primary tumours were lung cancer (n = 6), prostate cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 5), kidney cancer (n = 4) and lymphoma (n = 1). All the specimens matched pathological characteristics of their corresponding primary tumours, except in one patient. This 42-year-old man had stage-4 colon cancer, in whom the pathologic findings could not enable differentiation between colon and prostate cancer.

CONCLUSION

Transpedicular biopsy of the vertebra is a cost-effective diagnostic tool for evaluating unknown primary tumours.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary site

Neuroendocrine carcinomas of unknown primary site are uncommon, diverse tumors with variable clinical behavior, predicted by tumor grade or differentiation. Most of these carcinomas probably arise from an occult/clinically undetectable primary site in one of several locations (bronchus, pancreas, stomach, colon, rectum and several other sites). Patients with these tumors are a subset of unknown primary carcinoma with relatively favorable prognoses. Low-grade or well-differentiated tumors are frequently indolent and cases should be managed similar to advanced carcinoid tumors. Targeted therapies may have a role in the treatment of low-grade tumors. The high-grade or poorly differentiated carcinomas, including small cell and large cell neuroendocrine tumors, are rapidly growing and aggressive but responsive to platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Poorly differentiated large cell neuroendocrine tumors, first reported in 1988, are usually not recognized by routine hematoxylin and eosin light microscopy but require immunohistochemical stains or electron microscopy for their diagnosis. A review of cytotoxic chemotherapy for patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas, including a series of 99 patients, revealed an overall response rate of 70%, with a 20% complete response rate. The median survival was 15 months, and a minority of patients (13%) had long-term survival. Tumor grade/differentiation currently is an important determinant of the management of these patients, and therapy in the future will be based on a more precise knowledge of the unique biology of these tumors.

Pathologic evaluation of unknown primary cancer

The pathologic approach to metastases of unknown primary cancer (UPC) is stepwise and uses the clinical context, morphology, and, where necessary, immunohistochemistry (IHC). This review covers the initial approach to a UPC biopsy; the diagnosis of malignancy and broad tumor typing into carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, or sarcoma; and further subtyping of carcinoma into germ cell (broadly included), squamous, neuroendocrine, and solid organ including liver and renal, and adenocarcinomas. Finally, for adenocarcinoma, the prediction of primary tumor site, including lung, pancreas, stomach, colon, ovary, prostate, and breast, is discussed. For each tumor type, the morphologic features are presented alongside established useful IHC markers, with a description of their staining patterns and common diagnostic dilemmas. Optimal tissue handling and IHC interpretation, quality assurance, and limitations also are discussed. The target readership is oncologists, but other clinicians and trainee pathologists also may find the content of use.

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP)

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is one of the 10 most frequent cancers worldwide. It constitutes 3-5% of all human malignancies. Patients with CUP present with metastases without an established primary site. CUP manifests as an heterogeneous group of mainly epithelial cancers recognised by distinct clinicopathological entities. The diagnostic work-up includes extensive histopathology investigations and modern imaging technology. Nevertheless, the primary tumour remains undetected most of the time. Molecular diagnosis with DNA microarrays demonstrates high sensitivity, but its prognostic contribution is still uncertain. Certain clinicopathological CUP entities are considered as favourable sub-sets responding to systemic platinum-based chemotherapy or managed by locoregional treatment. These sub-sets are: the poorly differentiated carcinomas involving the mediastinal-retroperitoneal nodes, peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinomatosis in females, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, isolated axillary node adenocarcinomas in females or cervical nodal involvement by a squamous cell carcinoma. Patients who belong to the non-favourable sub-sets have a worse prognosis.

New prognostic index to predict survival in patients with cancer of unknown primary site with unfavourable prognosis

AIMS

To identify independent prognostic factors in patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) who do not belong to prognostically favourable subsets, and to develop a prognostic index for predicting survival in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective study, univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were conducted in a population of 145 patients with CUP in two clinical institutions. Subsets of patients with favourable prognostic features and those requiring well-defined treatment were excluded.

RESULTS

The 1-year overall survival rate for all patients was 42% and the median overall survival was 330 days. Overall survival was significantly related to the following pre-treatment prognostic factors: poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS)>or=2, presence of liver metastasis, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), high white blood cell count, anaemia, age>or=63 years, and prolonged QTc interval in electrocardiography (ECG). In multivariate analysis, four independent adverse prognostic parameters were retained: elevated LDH (hazard ratio 2.21; 95% confidence interval 1.41-3.47; P=0.001), prolonged QTc interval (hazard ratio 2.10; 95% confidence interval 1.28-3.44; P=0.003), liver metastasis (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.81; P=0.016) and ECOG PS>or=2 (hazard ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.73; P=0.03). We developed a prognostic index for overall survival based on the following subgroups: good prognosis (no or one adverse factor), intermediate prognosis (two adverse factors) and poor prognosis (three or four adverse factors). The median overall survival for the three subgroups was 420, 152 and 60 days, respectively, P<0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

This study validated previously identified important prognostic factors for survival in patients with CUP. Prolonged QTc was additionally identified as a strong adverse prognostic factor. We developed a simple prognostic index using performance status, LDH, presence of liver metastasis and QTc interval in ECG, which allowed assignment of patients into three subgroups with divergent outcome.

Exploring the epidemiological characteristics of cancers of unknown primary site in an Australian population: implications for research and clinical care

OBJECTIVES

To investigate incidence, mortality and case survival trends for cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) and consider clinical implications.

METHOD

South Australian Cancer Registry data were used to calculate age-standardised incidence and mortality rates from 1977 to 2004. Disease-specific survivals, socio-demographic, histological and secular predictors of CUP, compared with cancers of known primary site, and of CUP histological types, using multivariable logistic regression were investigated.

RESULTS

Incidence and mortality rates increased approximately 60% between 1977--80 and 1981--84. Rates peaked in 1993--96. Male to female incidence and mortality rate ratios approximated 1.3:1. Incidence and mortality rates increased with age. The odds of unspecified histological type, compared with the more common adenocarcinomas, were higher for males than females, non-metropolitan residents, low socio-economic areas, and for 1977--88 than subsequent diagnostic periods. CUP represented a higher proportion of cancers in Indigenous patients. Case survival was 7% at 10 years from diagnosis. Factors predictive of lower case survival included older age, male sex, Indigenous status, lower socio-economic status, and unspecified histology type.

CONCLUSION

Results point to poor CUP outcomes, but with a modest improvement in survival. The study identifies socio-demographic groups at elevated risk of CUP and of worse treatment outcomes where increased research and clinical attention are required.

Liver metastases from cancer of unknown primary (CUPL): a retrospective analysis of presentation, management and prognosis in 49 patients and systematic review of the literature

AIM

Patients with liver metastases from cancer of unknown primary (CUPL) have a dismal prognosis. We retrospectively analysed their management and outcome and performed a systematic review of CUPL series published in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Electronic data from 49 CUPL patients referred to Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) centers were retrospectively studied for characteristics of clinical presentation, diagnostic workup, management, outcome and prognostic factors. A systematic literature review was undertaken in PubMed and EmBase databases.

RESULTS

All our patients (males: 31, females: 18; median age: 65) underwent a computed tomography scan (CT) of the abdomen, 71% a thoracic CT, 53% gastroscopy and 47% colonoscopy. The commonest histologic subtypes encountered were adenocarcinoma (N=34) or undifferentiated carcinoma (N=12). The liver was the only metastatic site in 38% of patients, while it was accompanied with other metastatic sites in 62% (the commonest: lung, bone and lymph nodes). Forty-seven patients received first-line chemotherapy (42 platinum based) and 16 second-line. An objective response was observed in six patients (12%), median survival being 10 months (95% CI, 7-13). In univariate analysis, good performance status and normal baseline serum CEA levels were correlated with superior survival, while in multivariate analysis only age<55 (HR 0.16, p=0.02) and the absence of extrahepatic disease (HR 0.21, p=0.007) predicted for a better outcome. Published data from four relevant series (total patients=662) parallel our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with liver metastases from CUP are resistant to conventional types of treatment and carry a poor prognosis. Understanding the molecular biology of CUP is essential for the development of new, targeted effective therapies.

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary - an Orphan Disease?

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is an intriguing clinical finding that is defined as biopsy-proven metastasis from a malignancy in the absence of an identifiable primary site after a complete clinical work-up. CUP is a relatively common clinical entity, accounting for approximately 3-5% of all cancer diagnoses, and consists of a heterogeneous group of tumors that have acquired the capacity to metastasize before the development of a clinically evident primary lesion. Notable advances have been made over the past years in the treatment of well-defined clinical subgroups of CUP, such as women with peritoneal carcinomatosis and young adults with poorly differentiated carcinomas of midline distribution, but for the majority of patients, the prognosis still remains poor. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with CUP syndrome, and emphasize the importance of identifying several favorable subsets of CUP, amenable to specific treatment options. In addition, we will point out novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches which will hopefully improve both our understanding and the prognosis of this more or less neglected disease.

[Pathologic and anatomic evidence of peritoneal metastases]

Peritoneal metastases are secondary tumours of the peritoneum and the most common tumours at this location. Ovarian carcinoma, colorectal cancer, and gastric cancer are the most frequent ones that show peritoneal involvement, along with carcinomas of the pancreas, gallbladder, uterus, and lung. Primary tumours originating in the peritoneum such as malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, primary peritoneal carcinoma, and benign peritoneal tumours along with inflammatory and reactive lesions must be differentiated from peritoneal metastases. Especially in cancer of unknown primary tumour, the discrimination between primary peritoneal tumours and peritoneal metastases is difficult and often requires immunohistochemical identification.

Multicenter phase-II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin [IROX regimen] in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of unknown primary: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) lacks established therapy although it affects 3% of cancer patients. We evaluated the irinotecan-oxaliplatin combination (IROX regimen) in previously untreated patients with non-favorable subsets of unknown primary carcinomas.

METHODS

This was a multicenter phase-II trial. Protocol treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity, and secondary end points were time to progression and survival.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with liver, bone or multiple visceral metastases entered into the trial and received a median 6 chemotherapy cycles (1-11). The regimen was very well tolerated with one febrile neutropenia case and six cases with diarrhea grade 3 (16%). In intent-to-treat analysis the tumor response rate was 13% (95% CI = 4.8-25.7%) and 12 patients (27%, 95%CI 13.9-40.4%) had at least 4 months' duration of disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median survival was 9.5 months, with 40% of patients alive at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The IROX regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile compared to other more toxic chemotherapy combinations in patients with poor-prognosis CUP.

The role of L1-CAM immunohistochemial staining in the diagnosis of abdominal-pelvic cancer of uncertain primary site in women

OBJECTIVE

The L1 adhesion molecule (L1-CAM,CD171) is over expressed in ovarian and endometrial carcinomas and other tumors derived from the Mullerian tract. Here we evaluated whether L1-CAM could serve as a novel tumor marker for the diagnosis of metastatic abdominal-pelvic cancers of uncertain origin in women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a 6-year period we investigated 28 patients with metastatic abdominal or pelvic cancer with uncertain primary-origin. In all these cases a thorough clinical, surgical, pathologic and immunohistochemistry evaluation was performed and correlated to the L1-CAM expression as determined by immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

In 20 patients where the differential diagnosis was primary ovarian or endometrial cancer and primary or recurrent colon cancer, L1 immunohistochemistry staining allowed or supported the correct diagnosis. In four cases L1 staining allowed the correct diagnosis between breast and ovarian cancer. In two cases vaginal metastases of unknown origin were positive to L1 immunohistochemistry staining implying their mullerian origin and one case each of inguinal lymph node metastases and abdominal wall cancer that were positive for L1-CAM, allowed the correct diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer. In a whole, L1-CAM was of crucial role of delinating the final diagnosis in 17 of the 28 cases described.

CONCLUSIONS

L1-CAM, a new tumor marker, was found to be specific for metastatic cancer originating from mullerian origin. Its incorporation into the conventional immunohistochemistry analysis in cases of cancer of unknown primary in women, allows a correct diagnosis and subsequent treatment in the majority of cases with abdominal-pelvic carcinomatosis.

Carcinoma of unknown primary site: development in a single institution of a prognostic model based on clinical and serum variables

PURPOSE

To identify clinical and biologic variables with significant impact on survival in patients with carcinomas of an unknown primary site (CUP) and to develop a simple prognostic model.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, univariate and multivariate prognostic factors analyses were conducted in a population of 100 patients with CUP. Patients with features requiring well defined treatments had previously been excluded.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) was significantly related to the following pretreatment adverse prognostic clinical factors: a poor performance status (2 or 3), weight loss more than 10% in the last six months, the presence of liver metastases and more than two metastatic sites. Two biological parameters predicted a significantly shorter survival: elevated serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and of lactate dehydrogenase. In the multivariate analysis, only two independent adverse prognostic parameters were retained: a poor performance status and the presence of liver metastases. We developed a prognostic model for OS based on the following subgroups: good prognosis (PS 0 or 1 and absence of liver metastases), intermediate prognosis (PS> or =2 or presence of liver metastases) and poor prognosis (PS> or =2 or presence of liver metastases). Median OS for the three groups was 10.8, 4 and 1.9 months respectively, p<0.0001.

CONCLUSION

A simple prognostic model using performance status and presence of liver metastases was developed. It allowed the assignment of patients into three subgroups with different outcomes. Treatment strategies could be adapted for each subgroup. We think that this prognostic model could be useful and should be validated in other patient series.

A Clinical Review of the Investigation and Management of Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in a Single Cancer Network

AIMS

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is a common encounter in oncological practice and represents 2.0-6.0% of all invasive malignancies. Evidence to support particular therapeutic strategies in this patient population is scarce, and empirical therapies are frequently derived from research on patients where the primary tumour site is known.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the management of all patients recorded to have a diagnosis of CUP in a single cancer centre over a period of 12 months. Health records were reviewed documenting the CUP subtype, the investigations carried out both in the referring cancer unit and subsequently at the cancer centre and the recommended treatment (type and regimen), together with survival. The outcomes were examined in respect to a number of prognostic factors. Statistical tests were considered significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-six patients were recorded to have a diagnosis of CUP, representing 3.7% of all referrals to the cancer centre. The median age of patients was 68 years (range 32-94 years), and 52.0% were women. The three most common CUP subgroups were CUP-liver/multiple sites (25.0%), CUP-bone (21.0%) and CUP-brain (16.0%). The remaining subgroups occurred at frequencies of less than 10% each. Histological confirmation was only obtained in 55.0% of cases. Even within a single subtype, 41 patients with CUP-liver/multiple sites underwent a total of 19 different investigations before any treatment being given. Forty-seven (28.0%) patients received radiotherapy, 30 (18.0%) received chemotherapy and 58 (35.0%) received supportive care alone. Nine different 5-fluorouracil-containing regimens were used in 11 patients treated with chemotherapy for CUP-liver. The overall median survival for all patients was 4.0 months. Survival was better in patients with a good performance status (0-1) and absent liver metastases (median survival 15.0 months; 95% confidence interval 8.0-22.1) and those who received chemotherapy (median survival 13.0 months; 95% confidence interval 7.4-18.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed female gender (P = 0.006), a good performance status (0/1) (P < 0.0001) and absent liver metastases (P = 0.002) as favourable prognostic indicators.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate management of patients with CUP is unclear and this study revealed a high degree of variation in clinical practice. This area is in urgent need of clinical research to ensure that the treatment of CUP is evidence based. Until such time, clinical recommendations are suggested for the investigation and treatment of such patients. Therapeutic progress will be facilitated by designating a clinical lead for CUP in each clinical network.

[Positron emission tomography in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas]

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) is an imaging modality which is becoming increasingly esential in oncology, especially in the management of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). The most common uses of the PET are listed in this thematic study: initial staging, cervical lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor and post-therapeutic follow-up. The advantages and drawbacks of this imaging tool are exposed here according to both our experience and data from the literature. Decision schemes are suggested for each use so as to optimize the use of this imaging modality in the management of these SCC. Other fields of application for the PET are mentioned, such as the in-progress evaluation of response to chemotherapy, the interest of this imaging tool in radiotherapy as well as current biochemical developments concerning new tracers.

Les carcinomes de primitif inconnu

PURPOSE

Carcinoma of unknown primary site is a common clinical syndrome, accounting for 2% of cancer patients. Diagnosis is a recurrent challenge for internists. Treatment is difficult and prognosis is still poor. This review presents one synthesis of diagnosis strategies and therapeutic trials. It envisages the interest of new molecular biology methods as well as therapeutic perspectives.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Pathologic examination completed with immunohistochemical tests, and, depending on cases, with electron microscopy, cytogenetics, and molecular biology is a key-point for diagnosis. Diagnosis work-up, based on histological type and on individualization of some clinical presentation, proceeds in three steps. Positron emission tomography is recommended when a curative treatment is planed, particularly in cases of isolated metastasis. Functional status analysed using the performance status and simple biologic parameters (serum lactate dehydrogenase, serum alkaline phosphatase) permit us to assess prognosis. Chemotherapy is offered for patients with a good general health status.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Further evaluation of positron emission tomography, as well as cost-benefit analyses, is warranted. Further randomised trials are necessary to determine the optimal chemotherapy regimen in good-risk patients and the interest of chemotherapy in patients with poor-risk disease. Gene expression profiling and proteomic evaluation, as well as pharmacogenomic offer new investigation fields.