Radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy

Salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer recurrence after cryosurgical ablation

OBJECTIVES

To retrospectively determine the outcome of patients treated with salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer recurrence after cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP). Biochemical control rates and morbidity were analyzed.

METHODS

Between January 1990 and November 1999, a total of 49 patients initially treated with CSAP were later irradiated because of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and/or a positive biopsy at Allegheny General Hospital. The clinical stage before cryosurgery was T1c in 7 patients; T2a in 7 patients; T2b in 10 patients; T3 in 17 patients; and T4 and/or N1 in 8 patients. The Gleason score was 6 or lower in 29 patients, 7 in 11 patients, and 8 or higher in 9 patients. The mean pre-CSAP PSA level was 15.7 ng/mL (range 2.4 to 45). One patient had a PSA level less than 4 ng/mL, 16 had a PSA level of 4 to 10 ng/mL, 21 had a PSA level of 10 to 20 ng/mL, and 11 had a PSA level greater than 20 ng/mL. Before the start of RT, a complete restaging workup was performed and was negative for distant metastatic disease in all 49 patients. The mean interval to recurrence after CSAP was 19 months (range 3 to 78). The mean RT dose to the planning target volume was 62.9 Gy (range 50.4 to 68.4).

RESULTS

The mean pre-RT PSA level was 2.4 ng/mL (range 0.1 to 7.4). After RT, the mean nadir PSA level was 0.4 ng/mL (range 0 to 4.2). The mean time to PSA nadir was 5.8 months (range 1 to 15). In 42 patients, the PSA nadir was less than 1.0 ng/mL, in 5 patients the PSA nadir was greater than 1 ng/mL, and in 2 patients the PSA level remained stable. With a median follow-up time of 32 months (range 12 to 85), the overall biochemical control rate was 61%. The mean time to biochemical failure was 14.5 months (range 1 to 47). Of 30 patients with a pre-RT PSA level of 2.5 ng/mL or less, the disease of 22 (73%) was controlled compared with only 8 (42%) of 19 with a pre-RT PSA level greater than 2.5 ng/mL (P = 0.040). Biochemical control occurred in 18 (69%) of 26 patients with a dose of 64 Gy or greater compared with only 12 (52%) of 23 patients with a dose of less than 64 Gy (P = 0.024). The disease of 20 (70%) of 29 patients with a Gleason score of 6 or lower was controlled versus 10 (50%) of 20 patients with a Gleason score of 7 or greater (P = 0.064). Only 2 patients developed subacute morbidity (proctitis and a urethral stricture). All complications resolved with conservative measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage RT for prostate cancer recurrence after CSAP appears feasible. Our preliminary experience revealed that post-CSAP RT in patients with prostate cancer appears to effectively diminish the post-RT PSA level to a nadir of 1.0 ng/mL or less in most patients. The pre-RT PSA level and radiation dose may be important predictors of biochemical control in the salvage setting. RT as described was associated with minimal toxicity to the gastrointestinal/genitourinary systems. Additional prospective randomized studies are necessary to better assess the role of RT in the treatment of these patients.

Adjuvant radiation therapy does not cause urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

We analyzed the potential influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients with N0M0 prostate cancer randomized in a prospective study on postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced disease (positive surgical margin, capsular perforation and/or seminal vesicle infiltration) were studied. Objective pad weighing tests corroborated by direct personal interviews were used to evaluate urinary continence at regular postoperative intervals.

RESULTS

Of the patients 48 received 60 Gy. external radiotherapy with 18 MV photon beams between 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively, and 52 were followed expectantly. Risk factors were similar in both groups. With a mean followup of 24 months, no difference in complete urinary continence was observed. Of the irradiated group 77% and of the surveillance group 83% were totally dry. The fate of the bladder neck had no significant influence on final continence status, although there was a trend for faster recovery when the bladder neck was preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective randomized study 60 Gy. external radiation therapy administered between 3 and 4 months after radical prostatectomy for pathologically locally advanced prostate cancer had no significant influence on urinary continence.

Ionizing radiation-inducible apoptosis in the absence of p53 linked to transcription factor EGR-1

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a pivotal regulator of apoptosis, and prostate cancer cells that lack p53 protein are moderately resistant to apoptotic death by ionizing radiation. Genes encoding the transcription factor early growth response-1 (EGR-1) and cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were induced upon irradiation of prostate cancer cells, and inhibition of EGR-1 function resulted in abrogation of both TNF-alpha induction and apoptosis. Induction of the TNF-alpha gene by ionizing radiation and EGR-1 was mediated via a GC-rich EGR-1-binding motif in the TNF-alpha promoter. Because TNF-alpha induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells, these findings suggest that, in the absence of p53, ionizing radiation-inducible apoptosis is mediated by EGR-1 via TNF-alpha transactivation.