Hemolytic uremic syndrome after high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support

Posttreatment complications in pediatric cervical neuroblastoma: A retrospective case series at a tertiary cancer center

BACKGROUND

Neuroblastomas rarely occur as primary tumors in the cervical region. Therefore, very little has been reported regarding treatment strategies, complications, and outcomes of these cervical neuroblastomas. The goal of this study is to review the presentation, management, and outcomes of all primary cervical pediatric neuroblastoma cases at a single tertiary care center.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of all neuroblastoma patients treated at a single center were performed. All patients with primary cervical neuroblastoma were reviewed for demographic information, tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty (1.8%) patients were found to have undergone treatment for cervical neuroblastoma tumors diagnosed on average at 2.1 years old. Most presented with a swollen neck/palpable mass ± Horner's syndrome. Based on features including tumor staging, N-myc proto-oncogene protein (MYCN) amplification status, histology, most were deemed intermediate or high risk. Treatment strategies centered around chemotherapeutic regimens with surgery when possible as well as various adjuvant treatments including radiation therapy, immunotherapy, bone marrow transplant, and a neuroblastoma vaccine. Ten (33.3%) of patients experienced treatment-related complications and four (13.3%) died as a result of their disease progression. All four patients were high-risk patients, two of which had MYCN amplification.

CONCLUSION

Cervical neuroblastomas generally have favorable outcomes. These tumors can be treated effectively with chemotherapy and surgical intervention with various adjuvant therapies. MYCN amplification and higher stage disease presentation contribute to worse outcomes.

Antineoplastic agents and thrombotic microangiopathy

Thrombotic microangiopathy is an uncommon but reported adverse effect of a variety of antineoplastic drugs, including chemotherapy agents such as mitomycin C and gemcitabine, and newer targeted agents such as the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. We present a review of thrombotic microangiopathy associated with antineoplastic agents and its implications in current cancer therapy.

Transplant-associated microangiopathy (TAM) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants

We studied occurrence, risk factors and outcome of patients with transplant-associated microangiopathy (TAM) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A total of 221 consecutive patients were transplanted between 1995 and 2002. TAM is defined as evidence of hemolysis and schistocytes in the first 100 days. Outcomes analyzed included TAM and overall survival. Of 221 patients, 68 had TAM. The cumulative incidence was 31 (25-38)% at 100 days. Patients with TAM had higher LDH, higher bilirubin, higher creatinine and more often neurologic symptoms. TAM was not associated with stem cell source, cyclosporine levels and was not more frequent in recent years. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for TAM included donor type, age, gender, ABO-incompatibility and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). In patients with TAM, 1-year survival was lower than in patients without TAM (27 +/- 18% for TAM with high schistocyte counts; 53 +/- 15% for TAM with low schistocyte counts; vs 78 +/- 7% in patients without TAM; P<0.0001). TAM was independently associated with mortality adjusting for donor type, age and aGvHD occurrence and severity. TAM is frequent after HSCT and is associated with mortality even after adjustment for aGvHD grade. Risk factors of TAM are similar to aGvHD. TAM may represent endothelial damage driven by donor-host interactions.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and stroke due to human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation in an adult receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation

We report an adult autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) patient who developed transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) due to human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) reactivation. A 58-year-old female with Stage IIIA IgGkappa multiple myeloma received a melphalan (200 mg/m2) ASCT with discharge home after resolution of ASCT-related toxicities. She presented on D+20 with dyspnea, rash, and fever to 105 degrees F, followed by worsening dyspnea, hypotension, and capillary leak. Mental status (MS) changes were noted on D+23, but head CT and EEG were unremarkable. On D+29, a generalized seizure occurred with decline in platelet count and haptoglobin. TMA was noted on peripheral blood smear and therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) was initiated on D+31. Lumbar puncture (LP) revealed CSF protein 74 mg/dL and white blood count 7,000/mm3 with 74% lymphocytosis. TPE was continued without improvement in her MS or thrombocytopenia despite improvement in microangiopathy. An MRI of the brain showed a left hippocampus abnormality, and an EEG was consistent with encephalopathy. Serum polymerase chain regimen (PCR) was negative for CMV, HSV1, and HSV2 but was strongly positive for HHV-6. Repeat LP protein was 597 mg/dL. Foscarnet was initiated, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PCR for HHV-6 revealed 1,400 DNA copies/mL. Her MS greatly improved within 48 hr of antiviral therapy, serum HHV-6 became negative, and TPE was tapered without recurrence of her TMA. TMA with HHV-6 reactivation is likely an underdiagnosed entity. Given its fulminant course and favorable response to therapy, HHV-6 reactivation should be considered a potential etiology in patients with TMA after ASCT.

BMT: Bone Marrow Transplant Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy

Thrombotic microangiopathy is a severe microvascular disorder which may occur in up to 70% of patients undergoing bone marrow transplant. Clinically the term thrombotic microangiopathy encompasses a wide spectrum of syndromes, most importantly the thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). Thrombotic microangiopathy is characterized by the presence of thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, renal impairment, neurological disturbances and multiorgan failure. Several causative agents have been advocated as triggering factors for bone marrow transplant associated thrombotic microangiopathy, including cyclosporine, FK506, the use of total body irradiation, infections and the presence of severe graft-versus-host disease. Plasma exchange represents the standard treatment for patients who develop TTP/HUS after bone marrow transplant, however, the mortality rate still remains high despite aggressive therapy.

A review of hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients treated with gemcitabine therapy

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare condition that occasionally is reported in cancer patients. Recently it has been observed that gemcitabine rarely may be associated with this condition.

METHODS

The manufacturer's safety database and literature were reviewed for any report regarding gemcitabine associated with renal and hematologic abnormalities. Descriptive analysis was used to examine each case for an association between gemcitabine therapy and HUS and to identify its incidence and risk factors.

RESULTS

Through December 31, 1997, 12 cases were identified that fit either the clinical (uremia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia) or pathologic (renal biopsy) criteria for HUS. There were 7 males (58%) and 5 females (42%) with a median age of 55.5 years (range, 37-73 years). The median duration of gemcitabine therapy was 5.8 months (range, 3.8-13.1 months). Six patients died, five improved, and one patient's outcome was unknown. Among the six deaths, three patients died of cancer progression, one patient died of an unrelated myocardial infarction, and two patients died of HUS or HUS-related complications. For the five patients who improved, treatment was comprised of dialysis, plasmapheresis, splenectomy, or a combination. Attempts to correlate patient demographics, primary malignancy, and cumulative gemcitabine dose failed to identify consistent risk factors in predisposing patients to HUS. Confounding factors were common, including mitomycin-C and/or 5-fluorouracil exposure, advanced stage tumors, or preexisting renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a patient exposure of 78,800, a crude overall incidence rate of 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) was determined, showing that HUS associated with gemcitabine treatment appears to be rare. Nonetheless, as with other cancer treatments, clinicians should weigh the appropriate risk/benefit ratio in using gemcitabine to treat their patients.

A review of hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients treated with gemcitabine therapy

BACKGROUND

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a rare condition that occasionally is reported in cancer patients. Recently it has been observed that gemcitabine rarely may be associated with this condition.

METHODS

The manufacturer's safety database and literature were reviewed for any report regarding gemcitabine associated with renal and hematologic abnormalities. Descriptive analysis was used to examine each case for an association between gemcitabine therapy and HUS and to identify its incidence and risk factors.

RESULTS

Through December 31, 1997, 12 cases were identified that fit either the clinical (uremia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia) or pathologic (renal biopsy) criteria for HUS. There were 7 males (58%) and 5 females (42%) with a median age of 55.5 years (range, 37-73 years). The median duration of gemcitabine therapy was 5.8 months (range, 3.8-13.1 months). Six patients died, five improved, and one patient's outcome was unknown. Among the six deaths, three patients died of cancer progression, one patient died of an unrelated myocardial infarction, and two patients died of HUS or HUS-related complications. For the five patients who improved, treatment was comprised of dialysis, plasmapheresis, splenectomy, or a combination. Attempts to correlate patient demographics, primary malignancy, and cumulative gemcitabine dose failed to identify consistent risk factors in predisposing patients to HUS. Confounding factors were common, including mitomycin-C and/or 5-fluorouracil exposure, advanced stage tumors, or preexisting renal dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a patient exposure of 78,800, a crude overall incidence rate of 0.015% (range, 0.008-0.078%) was determined, showing that HUS associated with gemcitabine treatment appears to be rare. Nonetheless, as with other cancer treatments, clinicians should weigh the appropriate risk/benefit ratio in using gemcitabine to treat their patients.