A Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel and 3 days of high dose oral estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer (Hrpc): Present and Future Approaches of Therapy

The mainstay of therapy for patients with advanced prostate cancer still remains androgen deprivation, although response to this is invariably temporary. Most of the patients develop hormone-refractory disease resulting in progressive clinical deterioration and, ultimately, death. Until recently there has been no standard chemotherapeutic approach for hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), the major benefits of chemotherapy being only palliative. The studies combining mitoxantrone plus a corticosteroid demonstrated that chemotherapy could be given to men with symptomatic HRPC with minimal toxicity and a significant palliation could be provided. Recently, results from 2 phase III randomized clinical trials demonstrating that a combination of docetaxel plus prednisone can improve survival in men with HRPC have propelled docetaxel-based therapy into the forefront of treatment options for these patients as the new standard of care. There is a promising activity of new drug combinations such as taxanes plus vinca alkaloids; bisphosphonates are assuming a prominent role in prostate therapy through their ability to prevent skeletal morbidity. Combinations of classic chemotherapeutic agents and biological drugs began to be tested in phase II-III trials and the first results appear interesting. This article focuses on combinations recently evaluated or under clinical development for the treatment of HRPC.

Is There a Standard Chemotherapeutic Regimen for Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer? Present and Future Approaches in the Management of the Disease

Prostate cancer that no longer responds to hormonal manipulation can be defined as hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Until recently, there has been no standard chemotherapeutic approach for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. The major benefits of chemotherapy in the treatment of the disease are palliative in nature, in terms of reduction of pain and use of analgesics and improvement of performance status, as followed in the most recent trials. Phase III studies are necessary to better evaluate the efficacy of the different regimens, because several old studies suffer for methodological deficits. There is a promising activity of new drug combinations, such as vinca alkaloids and taxanes. Phase I and II trial are testing combinations of classic chemotherapeutic agents and biologic drugs, and the first results appear interesting. In this article, recent advances in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer using chemotherapeutic regimens are critically reviewed.

A phase I/II trial of fixed-dose docetaxel plus irinotecan and escalating doses of estramustine phosphate for second-line or greater treatment of selected advanced solid tumors

This phase I/II study evaluated the safety of the combination of irinotecan, docetaxel, and estramustine for selected advanced solid tumors and also obtained initial efficacy data. Twenty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The regimen consisted of docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) both given intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days in combination with escalating doses of estramustine (500 mg/m(2)/day escalated to 750 mg/m(2)/day on days 0, 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9 given every 21 days) during phase I. Dose escalation was continued until the maximum planned dose level of estramustine (750 mg/m(2)/day) was reached. After the appropriate phase II dose of estramustine was found additional patients were enrolled. Twenty-one of the 22 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 17 for tumor response. The recommended phase II dose of estramustine was found to be 750 mg/m(2)/day orally on days 0, 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9 given every 21 days. Hematologic toxicity was fairly mild, with only one episode of grade 3 neutropenia. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity with grade 3 toxicity occurring in five of 21 patients. Only one episode of venous thrombosis was observed. Objective response rate was 15.8%, overall clinical benefit rate was 63%, and median time to progression was 15 weeks. Estramustine in combination with the doublet of docetaxel and irinotecan is a well-tolerated regimen with minimal hematologic toxicity, mild to moderate nonhematologic toxicity, and promising initial antitumor activity in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors.

First pharmacophore-based identification of androgen receptor down-regulating agents: discovery of potent anti-prostate cancer agents

A qualitative 3D pharmacophore model (a common feature based model or Catalyst HipHop algorithm) was developed for well-known natural product androgen receptor down-regulating agents (ARDAs). The four common chemical features identified included: one hydrophobic group, one ring aromatic group, and two hydrogen bond acceptors. This model served as a template in virtual screening of the Maybridge and NCI databases that resulted in identification of six new ARDAs (EC(50) values 17.5-212 microM). Five of these molecules strongly inhibited the growth of human prostate LNCaP cells. These novel compounds may be used as leads to develop other novel anti-prostate cancer agents.

Effective chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC): Present status and perspectives with taxane-based treatments

Prostate cancer is a significant health concern for men worldwide. It continues to be the most common lethal malignancy diagnosed in American men and the second leading cause of male cancer mortality. Hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) remains clinically challenging. Two large phase III studies have demonstrated a survival advantage in HRPC patients utilizing docetaxel chemotherapy, setting a new standard of care for this disease. This paper examines the progress that has been made in HRPC with the Taxanes (Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, and Epothilones) with a glimpse on mechanisms of resistance and on combinations able to overcome it. In addition, new targeted therapies under development in combination with taxanes are reviewed with an explanation of their molecular mechanisms of action.

Changing perspectives of the role of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer

The use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced prostate adenocarcinoma has been validated by the recent demonstration of survival benefit in two large randomized phase III trials. Before publication of these landmark trials, SWOG 9916 and TAX 327, no chemotherapeutic regimen had shown survival benefit in the treatment of androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPC). These trials provide new encouragement for the use of chemotherapy in all stages of disease. Improved communication between medical and urologic oncologists and early patient referral for clinical trial participation remains essential for identifying new chemotherapeutic regimens with improved activity in AIPC and for defining the role of chemotherapy in earlier-stage disease. This article discusses the role of chemotherapy as the current standard of care for the treatment of AIPC and provides a historical perspective of the trials that preceded the development of current docetaxel-based regimens.

Cancer of the prostate

Prostate carcinoma, with about 190,000 new cases occurring each year (15% of all cancers in men), is the most frequent cancer among men in northern and western Europe. Causes of the disease are essentially unknown, although hormonal factors are involved, and diet may exert an indirect influence; some genes, potentially involved in hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) have been identified. A suspect of prostate cancer may derive from elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) finding. For a definitive diagnosis, however, a positive prostate biopsy is requested. Treatment strategy is defined according to initial PSA stage, and grade of the disease and age and general conditions of the patient. In localized disease, watchful waiting is indicated as primary option in patients with well or moderately differentiated tumours and a life expectancy <10 years, while radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy (with or without hormone-therapy) could be appropriate choices in the remaining cases. Hormone-therapy is the treatment of choice, combined with radiotherapy, for locally advanced or bulky disease and is effective, but not curative, in 80-85% of the cases of advanced disease. Patients who develop a hormone-refractory prostate cancer disease (HRPC) have to be evaluated for chemotherapy because of the recent demonstration of improved overall survival (2-2.5 months) and quality of life with docetaxel in more than 1,600 cases.

Phase II trial of estramustine and etoposide in androgen-sensitive metastatic prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early chemohormonal therapy in metastatic prostate cancer may offer an advantage by simultaneously targeting androgen-dependent and -independent clones. Hence, a phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of estramustine and etoposide in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Eligibility consisted of untreated metastatic prostate cancer, adequate organ function, and a performance status of 0 to 2 by Zubrod criteria. A 21-day schedule of oral estramustine (10 mg/kg/day) and etoposide (50 mg/m2/day) was administered every 28 days. Hormonal therapy was allowed at the end of the protocol therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly, PSA levels were assessed with each cycle, and objective response was evaluated every 3 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled (10 white, 11 black) with a median age of 59.5 years (range, 42-79 years), a median PSA of 338 ng/mL (range, 0.9-20,000 ng/mL), and a median Gleason score of 8 points. Ten patients had bone-only metastases, 11 had measurable disease, of whom 4 had visceral metastases. A total of 128 cycles were administered (median, 6 cycles). No dose reductions were required. Nineteen patients were able to be evaluated for response. Severe toxicities included thromboembolic events and anemia in 2 patients each and fatigue in 1 patient. There were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Response was observed in 8 of 11 patients (73%) with measurable disease. Median PSA nadir after therapy was 0.45 ng/mL, and undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/mL) was achieved in 4 patients. Median time to PSA progression was 16.65 months. At a median follow-up of 34 months, 18 patients were alive. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 90%, 82%, and 72% respectively. Median survival has not yet been reached.

CONCLUSION

The combination of estramustine and etoposide is well tolerated, and has promising activity in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Novel cytotoxic and biological agents for prostate cancer: Where will the money be in 2005?

In 2004, docetaxel-based chemotherapy became the first treatment capable of extending life in androgen-independent prostate cancer. The era of therapeutic nihilism in this disease has thus been put to rest and a broad range of agents is being tested with the goal of improving on the successes of 2004. Lessons learned from other tumour types will need to be applied to prostate cancer in order to harness the bounty of available ideas. Target amplification or activating mutations and not merely the presence of a target are likely to be important to the success of targeted agents. Thus, the promise of the current crop of targeted agents is most likely to be realised when pursued in the context of well-credentialed targets and tested in highly translational clinical trials that are capable not only of assessing tumour response, but also of evaluating the status of the targeted pathway. The most promising agents in clinical development are reviewed.

Clinical trials in metastatic prostate cancer – Has there been real progress in the past decade?

Hormone refractory prostate cancer remains a challenge. While only palliative treatment strategies were available for the past several decades, many promising agents have been investigated over the past decade. Of those the taxanes appeared with significant anti-tumor activity and recently, two large randomized controlled trials demonstrated for the first time, a survival and palliative benefit with docetaxel based chemotherapy. In the current era, recurrent disease after local treatment for localized disease is diagnosed long before evidence of systemic disease. With earlier institution of hormonal treatments, patients are becoming "hormone refractory" earlier in the course of their disease with considerable long life expectancy. Hence, there is a greater need than ever for more treatment options for this expanding group of patients. A number of new systemic therapies have recently emerged, based on a deeper understanding of prostate cancer biology. Novel chemotherapeutics such as the epothilones, molecularly targeted therapies against angiogenesis, the proteosome and endothelin receptor antagonists, as well as biological agents such as anti-sense oligonucleotides are being tested as part of the armamentarium. Key to progress in the therapy of this fatal disease is the commitment and timely enrolment of prostate cancer patients in clinical trials.

Androgen receptor level controlled by a suppressor complex lost in an androgen-independent prostate cancer cell line

Androgen receptor (AR) overexpression is one of the characteristics of prostate cancer (PC) that progresses to hormone independence. An androgen-independent (AI) derivative, with much higher AR-mRNA and protein levels than the parental LNCaP cell line, whose proliferation was androgen dependent (AD), was used to explore the mechanism of AR overexpression. We found that a suppressor element (ARS), previously identified in mouse AR and located in the 5'-untranslated region of human AR gene, malfunctions in AI cells. Transfection of constructs that included ARS element into AD cells reduced the transactivating activities of both AR promoter and a heterologous SV40 promoter. The deletion of ARS resulted in an eightfold increase in AR-promoter activity in AD cells, but had no effect in AI cells. Moreover, the nuclear extracts of AD cells contained proteins that produced a specific, ARS-binding complex, while this complex appeared to have been lost from AI cells. Most importantly, treatment of AI cells with a demethylating agent or histone deacetylase inhibitors restored the lost ARS-binding complex. The restoration of the complex coincided with a reduced expression of AR-mRNA and protein and a reduced rate of AR-gene transcription, determined by nuclear run-on experiment. Thus, epigenetic transcriptional silencing of the suppressor protein(s) may be responsible for AR overexpression in AI cells, and its reversal in hormone-independent PC may normalize AR levels and restore their hormone dependence.

Prevention and management of prostate cancer chemotherapy complications

Prevention and management of the adverse effects of prostate cancer chemotherapy depend on skilled regimen selection, dose adjustment, use of supportive care strategies, and a thorough understanding of the patient- and regimen-related factors that determine the risk for toxicity. Urologists, radiation oncologists, and primary care providers can play an important role before chemotherapy is prescribed by judicious use of treatments that impair bone marrow and other vital organ function. The current role of chemotherapy in prostate cancer is palliative. Successful palliation depends on reducing cancer-related suffering without introducing treatment-related suffering. Thus prevention and management of toxicity is central to the success of chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer.

Biweekly Administration of Low-Dose Docetaxel in Hormone-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Pilot Study of an Effective Subtoxic Therapy

Taxane-based chemotherapy has shown activity but also toxicity when administered at standard doses in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). In this pilot study, we investigated biweekly low-dose docetaxel in patients with HRPC as a convenient regimen with low toxicity. Sixteen patients with metastatic HRPC entered the study. Median age was 73 years, median performance status (PS) was 2, and median Gleason score was 9. All patients had undergone and failed combined androgen-blockade therapy (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue plus antiandrogen) for their metastatic disease; 3 had also been treated with mitoxantrone. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 administered every 2 weeks. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, characterized by a 50% decrease of PSA level confirmed 4 weeks later, was the primary endpoint. Durations of PSA response and toxicity assessment were secondary endpoints. A total of 136 biweekly docetaxel doses were administered, with a median of 8.5 doses per patient (range, 2-24). Six patients (38%; 95% confidence interval, 25%-43%) fulfilled the criteria of PSA response. Median duration of PSA response was 4.5 months (range, 3-12). Toxicity was negligible: myelotoxicity was practically absent, whereas 3 patients developed grade 1 alopecia and 1 patient developed dacryorrhea. We conclude that our study provides evidence that biweekly docetaxel at 30 mg/m2 can be considered an effective nontoxic therapeutic option for patients with HRPC. Confirmation of these preliminary data in larger-scale trials is justified

Current strategies in the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in American males, and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Most patients who develop metastatic disease will initially respond to androgen deprivation, but response is invariably temporary. Most patients will develop androgen-independent ("hormone-refractory") disease that results in progressive clinical deterioration and ultimately death. This progression to androgen independence is accompanied by increasingly evident DNA instability and alterations in genes and gene expression, including mutations in p53, over-expression of Bcl2, and mutations in the androgen receptor gene, among others. Treatment options for hormone refractory disease include intensive supportive care, radiotherapy, bisphosphonates, second-line hormonal manipulations, cytotoxic chemotherapy and investigational agents. A post-treatment reduction in the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) by 50% has been shown to correlate with survival and has been accepted by consensus as a valid endpoint in clinical trials. Chemotherapeutic agents such as mitoxantrone, estramustine, and the taxanes have yielded improved response rates and palliative benefit, but not improved survival. Therefore, current efforts must be focused on enrolling patients onto clinical trials of investigational agents with novel mechanisms of action, and on using survival, time to progression, and quality of life as end points in routine clinical practice.

Paclitaxel (taxol) inhibits the arylamine N-acetyltransferase activity and gene expression (mRNA NAT1) and 2-aminofluorene-DNA adduct formation in human bladder carcinoma cells (T24 and TSGH 8301)

Acetylator polymorphism in man results from differential expression of human liver N-acetyltransferase. N-Acetyltransferase enzyme activity has been demonstrated to be involved in some types of chemical carcinogenesis. Paclitaxel (taxol) had been shown to affect N-acetyltransferase activity of human lung cancer cells. In this study, paclitaxel was chosen to investigate the effects of arylamine N-acetyltransferase activity (N-acetylation of substrate), gene expression and 2-aminofluorene-DNA adduct formation in human bladder carcinoma cell lines (T24 and TSGH 8301). The N-acetyltransferase activity (N-acetylation of substrates) was determined by high performance liquid chromatography assaying for the amounts of acetylated 2-aminofluorene and p-aminobenzoic acid and nonacetylated 2-aminofluorene and p-aminobenzoic acid. Intact human bladder carcinoma T24 and TSGH 8301 cells were used for examining N-acetyltransferase activity, gene expression and 2-aminofluorene-DNA adduct formation. The results demonstrated that the N-acetyltransferase activity, gene expression (NAT1 mRNA) and 2-aminofluorene-DNA adduct formation in intact human bladder carcinoma cells were inhibited and decreased by paclitaxel in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of paclitaxel on the apparent values of Km and Vmax of N-acetyltransferase enzyme from intact human bladder carcinoma cells were also determined in these cell lines. A marked influence of paclitaxel was observed on the decreasing apparent values of Km and Vmax from intact human bladder carcinoma cells (T24 and TSGH 8301). Thus, paclitaxel is an uncompetitive inhibitor to the NAT enzyme.

An active regimen of weekly paclitaxel and estramustine in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of weekly high-dose paclitaxel in androgen-independent prostate carcinoma and its cytotoxic synergy with estramustine led to the evaluation of a weekly schedule of paclitaxel and estramustine in this Phase II trial.

METHODS

Patients were eligible if they had metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma with objective progression or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels despite androgen deprivation therapy and antiandrogen withdrawal. Prior radiation and/or one prior chemotherapy regimen was permitted. A Zubrod performance status of 2 or less and adequate bone marrow and hepatic and renal function were required. Estramustine was administered orally at a dose of 280 mg three times daily on days 1 to 3, 8 to 10, and 15 to 17. Paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on days 2, 9, and 16. Therapy was repeated every 28 days (one cycle).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 71.5 years). Fifteen patients had measurable disease (nine nodal and seven visceral) and 13 had bone-only metastases. A total of 116 cycles of therapy were delivered (median 4 cycles per patient, range 1 to 12). Nine patients required dose reduction. The predominant toxicities consisted of grade 3 neuropathy in 6 patients and grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 4 patients, with one hospitalization for febrile neutropenia. Three patients had thrombotic manifestations: one deep venous thrombosis and two non-Q wave myocardial infarctions. Of the 28 patients, 26 were assessable for response. Of 13 patients with measurable disease, 5 demonstrated a partial response (1 in the liver and 4 in the lymph nodes), and 8 of 13 patients with bone-only metastases had a 50% or greater decrease in PSA level. Three patients had a 90% or greater decline in PSA. The overall PSA response rate was 61.53% (95% confidence interval 38.1% to 74.2%). The median time to progression was 4.64 months, and the median survival was 13 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly estramustine and paclitaxel is active in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer.

The effect of paclitaxel on 2-aminofluorene-DNA adducts formation and arylamine N-acetyltransferase activity and gene expression in human lung tumor cells (A549)

In this study, paclitaxel was used to determine inhibition of arylamine N-acetyltransferase (NAT) activity, gene expression and 2-aminofluorene-DNA adduct formation in a human lung tumor cell line (A549). The activity of NAT was measured by HPLC assaying for the amounts of N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (2-AAF) and remaining 2-aminofluorene (2-AF). Human lung tumor cell cytosols and intact cells were used for examining NAT activity and carcinogen-DNA adduct formation. The results demonstrated that NAT activity, gene expression (NAT1 mRNA) and 2-AF-DNA adduct formation in human lung tumor cells were inhibited and decreased by paclitaxel in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of paclitaxel on the values of the apparent Km and Vmax of NAT from human lung tumor cells were also determined in both examined systems. The result also indicated that paclitaxel decreased the apparent values of Km and Vmax from human lung tumor cells in both cytosol and intact cells. Thus, paclitaxel is an uncompetitive inhibitor to NAT enzyme.

EMP combination chemotherapy and low-dose monotherapy in advanced prostate cancer

Many chemotherapeutic regimens combined with estramustine phosphate (EMP) have been elaborated for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer over 30 years. However, older EMP-based combination chemotherapies with vinblastine, vinorelbine, doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide showed relatively low PSA response rate (25-58%) accompanied with high toxicities. On the other hand, newly developed EMP-based combination regimens with etoposide, pacitaxel, carboplatin or docetaxel demonstrated promising PSA response rate (43-77%) with moderate to severe toxicity in the rate of thromboembolic event (5-18%) and of neutropenia (9-41%). Treatment-related death was less in the latter combination group (5/615, 0.8%) than that in the former group (3/234, 1.3%). Of note, in the docetaxel combination with EMP, PSA response rate is as high as 77% with high rate (41%) of neutropenia but no treatment-related death was observed. Docetaxel combination with EMP seems to be the best regimen, though not completely justified by randomized trials, to be selected in the modern era, which will be followed by paclitaxel, carboplatin and EMP combination with PSA response rate of 71%. In addition, an interim report in 83 patients was presented. They were not consecutively enrolled but were treated on low-dose EMP monotherapy for previously untreated advanced prostate cancer in Department of Urology of Tokyo University and our 21 affiliated hospitals. Overall PSA response rate was as high as 93.4% out of 76 assessable patients. However, overall toxicity rate was abnormally high (39.5%) with drug discontinuation rate of 32.1%. The reason of low drug compliance may be attributed to gastrointestinal symptoms. To overcome the low drug compliance, appropriate patients for EMP administration should be selected by using gene analysis on the basis of sophisticated tailor-made medicine.