Identification of cranial nerve nuclei

Monitoring cerebellopontine angle and skull base surgeries

Cerebellopontine angle (CPA) surgery represents a challenge for neurosurgeons due to the high risk of iatrogenic injury of vital neurological structures. Therefore, important efforts in improving the surgical techniques and intraoperative neurophysiology have been made in the last decades. We present a description and review of the available methodologies for intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping during CPA surgeries. There are three main groups of techniques to assess the functional integrity of the nervous structures in danger during these surgical procedures: (1) Electrical identification or mapping of motor cranial nerves (CNs), which is essential in order to locate the nerve in their different parts during the tumor resection; (2) Monitoring, which provides real-time information about functional integrity of the nervous tissue; and (3) Brainstem reflexes including blink reflex, masseteric reflex, and laryngeal adductor reflex. All these methods facilitate the removal of lesions and contribute to notable improvement in functional outcome and permit on the investigation of their physiopathology in certain neurosurgically treated diseases. Such is the case of hemifacial spasm (HFS). We describe the methodology to evaluate the efficacy of microvascular decompression for HFS treatment at the end of this chapter.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during resection of infratentorial lesions: the surgeon's view

OBJECTIVE

Methods of choice for neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring (IOM) within the infratentorial compartment mostly include early brainstem auditory evoked potentials, free-running electromyography, and direct cranial nerve (CN) stimulation. Long-tract monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) is rarely used. This study investigated the incidence of IOM alterations during posterior fossa surgery stratified for lesion location.

METHODS

Standardized CN and SEP/MEP IOM was performed in 305 patients being treated for various posterior fossa pathologies. The IOM data were correlated with lesion locations and histopathological types as well as other possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

Alterations in IOM were observed in 158 of 305 cases (51.8%) (CN IOM alterations in 130 of 305 [42.6%], SEP/MEP IOM alterations in 43 of 305 [14.0%]). In 15 cases (4.9%), simultaneous changes in long tracts and CNs were observed. The IOM alterations were followed by neurological sequelae in 98 of 305 cases (32.1%); 62% of IOM alterations resulted in neurological deficits. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of CN deficits were 98% and 77%, respectively, and 95% and 85%, respectively, for long-tract deficits. Regarding location, brainstem and petroclival lesions were closely associated with concurrent CN IOM and SEP/MEP alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IOM alterations during surgery in the posterior fossa varied widely between different lesion locations and histopathological types. This analysis provides crucial information on the necessity of IOM in different surgical settings. Because MEP/SEP and CN IOM alterations were commonly observed during posterior fossa surgery, the authors recommend the simultaneous use of both modalities based on lesion location.

Intraoperative Monitoring and Mapping of the Functional Integrity of the Brainstem

The risk of iatrogenic damage is very high in surgical interventions in or around the brainstem. However, surgical techniques and intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) have evolved sufficiently to increase the likelihood of successful functional outcomes in many patients. We present a critical review of the methodologies available for intraoperative monitoring and mapping of the brainstem. There are three main groups of techniques that can be used to assess the functional integrity of the brainstem: 1) mapping, which provides rapid anatomical identification of neural structures using electrical stimulation with a hand-held probe, 2) monitoring, which provides real-time information about the functional integrity of the nervous tissue, and 3) techniques involving the examination of brainstem reflexes in the operating room, which allows for the evaluation of the reflex responses that are known to be crucial for most brainstem functions. These include the blink reflex, which is already in use, and other brainstem reflexes that are being explored, such as the masseter H-reflex. This is still under development but is likely to have important functional consequences. Today an abundant armory of ION methods is available for the monitoring and mapping of the functional integrity of the brainstem during surgery. ION methods are essential in surgery either in or around the brainstem; they facilitate the removal of lesions and contribute to notable improvements in the functional outcomes of patients.

Brainstem mapping

The complex neuroanatomy of the brainstem and the additional distortion incurred by intrinsic lesions have previously discouraged aggressive neurosurgical procedures. Safe access to the brainstem and complete lesionectomy has been thwarted by considerable perioperative risk. Brainstem mapping has established itself as one of the means by which modern neurosurgery can improve surgical outcome while decreasing morbidity. It involves the use of neurophysiologic techniques for the identification of critical structures, such as the cranial motor nuclei and their nerves, and the corticobulbar and corticospinal tracts at different stages of the operation. Familiarity with these techniques can map a safe corridor toward a brainstem lesion and guide the surgeon during the resection. By means of reviewing the available literature, we discuss the anatomic, pathophysiologic, technical, and interpretational aspects of brainstem mapping and elaborate on its indications, limitations, and future directions.