Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES
To explore the impact of rurality on health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) disparities in rural long-term cancer survivors.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING
Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) 7, 8, and 9.
SAMPLE
91 adults at least five years post-treatment.
METHODS
Mailed surveys measured HRQOL, self-esteem, and social support. Regression models were estimated to isolate (from self-esteem and social support) the effect of level of rurality on HRQOL.
MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES
HRQOL, self-esteem, social support, and rurality.
FINDINGS
No differences in demographic characteristics existed among RUCCs. Survivors residing in RUCCs 7 or 8 tended to be similar in several dimensions of HRQOL. Survivors living in RUCC 7 reported significantly lower social function and greater financial difficulty and number of symptoms compared to survivors in RUCC 9 (the most remote). Self-esteem and social support strongly correlated with HRQOL.
CONCLUSIONS
The significant impact of rurality on HRQOL beyond self-esteem and social support suggests its role in explaining cancer survivorship disparities and directing practice. Until additional exploration can identify mechanisms behind rurality's impact, consideration of level of rurality as a potential factor in evaluating survivors' HRQOL outcomes is reasonable.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING
Survivor context (e.g., level of rurality) influences HRQOL outcomes. Context or culture-relevant risk minimization and HRQOL optimization nursing practices are indicated.
Collapse