The role of gene-environment interactions in social dysfunction: Focus on preclinical evidence from mouse studies

Human and animal research has demonstrated that genetic and environmental factors can strongly modulate behavioral function, including the expression of social behaviors and their dysfunctionalities. Several genes have been linked to pathologies characterized by alterations in social behaviors, e.g., aggressive/antisocial personality disorder (ASPD), or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Environmental stimulation (e.g., physical exercise, environmental enrichment) or adversity (e.g., chronic stress, social isolation) may respectively improve or impair social interactions. While the independent contribution of genetic and environmental factors to social behaviors has been assessed in a variety of human and animal studies, the impact of their interactive effects on social functions has been less extensively investigated. Genetic mutations and environmental changes can indeed influence each other through complex mutual effects, e.g., inducing synergistic, antagonistic or interactive behavioral outcomes. This complexity is difficult to be disentangled in human populations, thus encouraging studies in animal models, especially in the mouse species which is the most suitable for genetic manipulations. Here we review the available preclinical evidence on the impact of gene-environment interactions on social behaviors and their dysfunction, focusing on studies in laboratory mice. We included findings combining naturally occurring mutations, selectively bred or transgenic mice with multiple environmental manipulations, including positive (environmental enrichment, physical exercise) and aversive (social isolation, maternal separation, and stress) experiences. The impact of these results is critically discussed in terms of their generalizability across mouse models and social tests, as well as their implications for human studies on social dysfunction.

Genetic effects on male sexual coercion

The genetic and environmental influences on sexual coercion, and to what extent its associations with alcohol use and psychopathy depend on shared genetic and environmental effects, were explored in a Finnish population-based sample of 938 men, aged 33-43 years, using the classical twin study design. All three phenotypes were associated positively and affected by genes (sexual coercion 28%, alcohol use 60%, psychopathy 54%), with 46% of the correlation between sexual coercion and psychopathy, 89% of the correlation between alcohol use and psychopathy and 100% of the correlation between sexual coercion and alcohol use being explained by shared genetic effects. Further, the results showed that a proportion of the variance in sexual coercion was derived from a highly genetic source that was common with alcohol use and psychopathy. This latent factor was hypothesized to reflect a general tendency for antisocial behavior that is pervasive across different situations. Relevant theories on sexual coercion were discussed in light of the results.

Selective breeding for isolation-induced intermale aggression in mice: associated responses and environmental influences

Aggressive (TA) and nonaggressive (TNA) lines of mice were established by selective breeding for isolation-induced intermale aggression. This paper summarizes and updates studies performed on the TA and TNA lines. The genetic analysis revealed that in these lines the genes for aggression are located on the autosomes and demonstrate a Mendelian segregation. The genes are expressed only in the presence of androgens which are normally present only in males. Behavioral and biological responses associated with high and low levels of aggression in TA and TNA mice are reviewed. Line differences have been found in olfactory communication and marking behavior, in maternal and predatory aggression in females, in locomotor activity, and in learning abilities. Also, correlated neurochemical and endocrinological responses to the selection have been detected. Maternal factors during the preweaning period do not significantly affect the development of aggression in TA and TNA males, while early postweaning exposure to aggression or sex enhanced later aggressive and sexual activity. Early experience and genetic disposition for aggression are correlated, with TA males showing the greatest increase in the behaviors studied.