Use of donepezil for the treatment of mild-moderate Alzheimer's disease: an audit of the assessment and treatment of patients in routine clinical practice

Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

As dementia progresses, people living with dementia may take high-risk, unnecessary, or ineffective medicines. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may have benefit in some people with dementia; however, up to one third are continued when no longer necessary or safe. Our aim was to co-design a consult patient decision aid (CPtDA) to support shared decision making between healthcare professionals and consumers about continuing or deprescribing ChEIs.

METHODS

A systematic process was employed to design and test the CPtDA prototype. First, a steering group composed of healthcare professionals and a consumer representative was assembled. Guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the steering group defined the CPtDA's purpose, scope, and target audience and drafted the prototype for further testing. Interviews with consumers and healthcare professionals were conducted to gain feedback on the content, format, structure, comprehensibility and usability of the CPtDA prototype.

RESULTS

After the steering group developed the CPtDA prototype, interviews were conducted with 11 consumers and six healthcare professionals. The content and format of the decision aid were improved iteratively over three rounds after consolidating the feedback at each round. The main changes included rewording the purpose of the decision aid and simplifying its layout and format. Participants reported that the decision aid is comprehensible and may be useful in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited available resources guide shared decision making about deprescribing. This study resulted in a co-designed and alpha-tested CPtDA for people living with dementia and carers to help them review the ongoing need for their ChEIs. Further research is needed to explore using the CPtDA in practice to support people living with dementia and their carers engage in the shared decision-making process about continuing or deprescribing their ChEIs. Our co-designed CPtDA could help people living with dementia and their carers review their goals of care alongside their healthcare professional. This may prompt conversations about appropriately using ChEIs and increase the uptake of deprescribing.

Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One approach to symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease is to enhance cholinergic neurotransmission in the brain by blocking the action of the enzyme responsible for the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. This can be done by a group of drugs known as cholinesterase inhibitors. Donepezil is a cholinesterase inhibitor.This review is an updated version of a review first published in 1998.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of donepezil in people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease; to compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of donepezil; and to assess the effect of donepezil on healthcare resource use and costs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement's Specialized Register, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and a number of other sources on 20 May 2017 to ensure that the search was as comprehensive and up-to-date as possible. In addition, we contacted members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all double-blind, randomised controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was administered to people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease for 12 weeks or more and its effects compared with those of placebo in a parallel group of patients, or where two different doses of donepezil were compared.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer (JSB) extracted data on cognitive function, activities of daily living, behavioural symptoms, global clinical state, quality of life, adverse events, deaths and healthcare resource costs. Where appropriate and possible, we estimated pooled treatment effects. We used GRADE methods to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty studies involving 8257 participants met the inclusion criteria of the review, of which 28 studies reported results in sufficient detail for the meta-analyses. Most studies were of six months' duration or less. Only one small trial lasted 52 weeks. The studies tested mainly donepezil capsules at a dose of 5 mg/day or 10 mg/day. Two studies tested a slow-release oral formulation that delivered 23 mg/day. Participants in 21 studies had mild to moderate disease, in five studies moderate to severe, and in four severe disease. Seventeen studies were industry funded or sponsored, four studies were funded independently of industry and for nine studies there was no information on source of funding.Our main analysis compared the safety and efficacy of donepezil 10 mg/day with placebo at 24 to 26 weeks of treatment. Thirteen studies contributed data from 3396 participants to this analysis. Eleven of these studies were multicentre studies. Seven studies recruited patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, two with moderate to severe, and four with severe Alzheimer's disease, with a mean age of about 75 years. Almost all evidence was of moderate quality, downgraded due to study limitations.After 26 weeks of treatment, donepezil compared with placebo was associated with better outcomes for cognitive function measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog, range 0 to 70) (mean difference (MD) -2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.31 to -2.02, 1130 participants, 5 studies), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (MD 1.05, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.37, 1757 participants, 7 studies) and the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB, range 0 to 100) (MD 5.92, 95% CI 4.53 to 7.31, 1348 participants, 5 studies). Donepezil was also associated with better function measured with the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living score for severe Alzheimer's disease (ADCS-ADL-sev) (MD 1.03, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.85, 733 participants, 3 studies). A higher proportion of participants treated with donepezil experienced improvement on the clinician-rated global impression of change scale (odds ratio (OR) 1.92, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.39, 1674 participants, 6 studies). There was no difference between donepezil and placebo for behavioural symptoms measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) (MD -1.62, 95% CI -3.43 to 0.19, 1035 participants, 4 studies) or by the Behavioural Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) scale (MD 0.4, 95% CI -1.28 to 2.08, 194 participants, 1 study). There was also no difference between donepezil and placebo for Quality of Life (QoL) (MD -2.79, 95% CI -8.15 to 2.56, 815 participants, 2 studies).Participants receiving donepezil were more likely to withdraw from the studies before the end of treatment (24% versus 20%, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50, 2846 participants, 12 studies) or to experience an adverse event during the studies (72% vs 65%, OR 1.59, 95% 1.31 to 1.95, 2500 participants, 10 studies).There was no evidence of a difference between donepezil and placebo for patient total healthcare resource utilisation.Three studies compared donepezil 10 mg/day to donepezil 5 mg/day over 26 weeks. The 5 mg dose was associated with slightly worse cognitive function on the ADAS-Cog, but not on the MMSE or SIB, with slightly better QoL and with fewer adverse events and withdrawals from treatment. Two studies compared donepezil 10 mg/day to donepezil 23 mg/day. There were no differences on efficacy outcomes, but fewer participants on 10 mg/day experienced adverse events or withdrew from treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is moderate-quality evidence that people with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12 or 24 weeks with donepezil experience small benefits in cognitive function, activities of daily living and clinician-rated global clinical state. There is some evidence that use of donepezil is neither more nor less expensive compared with placebo when assessing total healthcare resource costs. Benefits on 23 mg/day were no greater than on 10 mg/day, and benefits on the 10 mg/day dose were marginally larger than on the 5 mg/day dose, but the rates of withdrawal and of adverse events before end of treatment were higher the higher the dose.

Influence of the rs1080985 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of the CYP2D6 Gene and APOE Polymorphism on the Response to Donepezil Treatment in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease in China

Background/Aim

Recent data have indicated that the rs1080985 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 and the common apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene may affect the response to donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). We investigated this association in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AD.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, analyses of CYP2D6 and APOE were conducted in 208 native Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AD. All patients were treated with donepezil 5 mg/day for 6 months, and the response to treatment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Results

No significant differences between responders (68.9%) and nonresponders (31.1%) to donepezil treatment (6 months' duration) were observed in the distribution of the CYP2D6 rs1080985 SNP, common APOE polymorphism or a combination of the two.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that neither the CYP2D6 nor the APOE polymorphism influences the 6-month response to donepezil treatment in a Chinese population with AD.

Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One of the aims of therapy is to inhibit the breakdown of a chemical neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, by blocking the relevant enzyme. This can be done by a group of chemicals known as cholinesterase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess whether donepezil improves the well-being of patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'Aricept' on 12 June 2005. This Register contains up-to-date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was compared with placebo for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the pooled treatment effects, or the risks and benefits of treatment estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

23 trials are included, involving 5272 participants. Most trials were of 6 months or less duration in selected patients. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function, activities of daily living, behaviour , global clinical state and health care resource costs. For cognition there is a statistically significant improvement for both 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil at 24 weeks compared with placebo on the ADAS-Cog scale (-2.01 points MD, 95%CI -2.69 to -1.34, p<0.00001); -2.80 points, MD 95% CI -3.74 to -2.10, p<0.00001) and for 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo at 52 weeks (1.84 MMSE points, 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.15, p=0.006). The results show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by a clinician) in people treated with 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil compared with placebo at 24 weeks for the number of patients showing improvement or no change (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.11, p=<0.0001, OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.78 to 3.19, p<0.00001). Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour, but not on the quality of life score . There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10 mg/day (but not the 5 mg/day) donepezil group compared with placebo which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10 mg/day. Benefits on the 10 mg/day dose were marginally larger than on the 5 mg/day dose. Two studies presented results for health resource use, and the associated costs. There were no significant differences between treatment and placebo for any item, the cost of any item, and for the total costs, and total costs including the informal carer costs. A variety of adverse effects were recorded, with more incidents of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, muscle cramps, dizziness, fatigue and anorexia (significant risk associated with treatment) in the 10 mg/day group compared with placebo but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

People with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12, 24 or 52 weeks with donepezil experienced benefits in cognitive function, activities of daily living and behaviour. Study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients, and measured less decline in measures of global disease severity. There is some evidence that use of donepezil is neither more nor less expensive compared with placebo when assessing total health care resource costs. Benefits on the 10 mg/day dose were marginally larger than on the 5 mg/day dose. Taking into consideration the better tolerability of the 5 mg/day donepezil compared with the 10 mg/day dose, together with the lower cost, the lower dose may be the better option. The debate on whether donepezil is effective continues despite the evidence of efficacy from the clinical studies because the treatment effects are small and are not always apparent in practice .

Cognitive performance in patients with Alzheimer's disease receiving cholinesterase inhibitors for up to 5 years

The cholinesterase inhibitors (ChE-Is)--rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine--demonstrated efficacy in large, 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, and are widely used for the symptomatic treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). Over the past few years, data have emerged, suggesting that these agents may have long-term benefits. These data have been summarized in this study, followed by an interpretation of clinical relevance. Data were identified by searches of Medline((R)) and references from relevant English-language articles. The search words 'Alzheimer', 'donepezil', 'rivastigmine', 'galantamine' and 'long term' were used. In addition, recent data presented at international congresses and/or provided by colleagues in this field of research were included in order to ensure maximum topicality. Data are available showing cognitive performance in patients remaining on rivastigmine for up to 5 years (n = 83), donepezil for up to 4.9 years (n = 18) and galantamine for up to 4 years (n = 185). Most of these data come from open-label studies and need to be interpreted with caution. The data appear to suggest that patients, caregivers and physicians will still see some decline on ChE-Is after a period of stabilization, but this may be slower and later than expected if the patients were left untreated. This applies across all domains of AD - not simply cognition - and function can be relatively preserved, even if cognitive scores are falling. Despite the limitations of current data, the information reviewed in this study may help practising doctors assess the long-term value of ChE-Is in this consistently progressive disease.

Cognitive performance in Alzheimer's disease patients receiving rivastigmine for up to 5 years

This analysis aimed to assess mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores in patients with Alzheimer's disease who received rivastigmine, an inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase, for up to 5 years. Rivastigmine data came from two pooled open-label extensions of four 6-month, randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Projections of decline, had the same patients not been treated, were made using a baseline-dependent mathematical model. MMSE data were available for 1998 rivastigmine-treated patients and 657, 298 and 83 were still on treatment at 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. The mean (+/-SD) baseline MMSE score was 19.3 (+/-4.9). Projected mean scores in model-based untreated patients declined below 10 points on the MMSE at about 3 years, while the mean MMSE score of patients who remained on rivastigmine stayed above 10 points for 5 years.

Clinical predictors of response to Acetyl Cholinesterase Inhibitors: experience from routine clinical use in Newcastle

BACKGROUND

Acetyl Cholinesterase Inhibitors (AChEIs) have been in clinical use for the past five years in the UK for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). There are few data on the patterns and predictors of response to AChEI therapy in routine clinical practice. We therefore investigated clinical variables that may distinguish between AChEI responders and non-responders.

METHODS

A retrospective sample of 160 consecutive patients with dementia who were treated on clinical grounds with an AChEI was studied. Treatment response was defined in two ways: (a) A clinical response was achieved when there was no deterioration or there was an improvement on a global clinical assessment (CGI) and (b) a Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE) response when there was an improvement of 2 or more MMSE points.

RESULTS

A total of 62 (45%) patients achieved an MMSE response. A diagnosis of dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease+Dementia (PDD) was associated with a MMSE response, as were hallucinations, and lower MMSE scores at baseline. 125 (78%) patients achieved a CGI response for which there were no clinical predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of illness, a diagnosis of DLB and PDD, and presence of hallucinations at baseline were predictive of a MMSE response. Non-AD dementia and severe dementia responded equally well to AChEI treatment and results of further randomised, placebo-controlled studies are needed to clarify the role of AChEI in the treatment of these disorders.

Reversal of visual attention dysfunction after AMPA lesions of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) by the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil and by a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635

RATIONALE

Degeneration of the cholinergic magnocellular neurons in the basal forebrain and their cortical projections is a major feature of the neuropathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition to memory dysfunction, attentional functions are also impaired in AD.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the extent to which the cholinesterase inhibitor donepezil reversed the attentional performance deficit in nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) lesioned rats. We also examined the effects of a selective and potent 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, on the attentional deficit of NBM lesioned rats.

METHODS

We injected alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) into the NBM to selectively destroy cholinergic neurons projecting to the neocortex. Attentional functions were examined using the 5-CSRT task, in which hungry rats were required to locate brief visual targets presented randomly in one of five locations in a specially designed chamber. RESULTS. AMPA lesions of the NBM caused marked reductions in choline acetyltransferase activity (ChAT) ranging from 30 to 46% in medial areas of the cortex (medial-frontal and cingulate) and from 58 to 72% in more lateral areas (anterior-dorso-lateral and parietal). AMPA lesioned rats made fewer correct responses (choice accuracy), longer latency to correct response and an increase in the number of premature and perseverative responses. These impairments showed some recovery over the next 12 weeks. Reducing the duration of the visual stimulus reinstated the impairments in choice accuracy. The anticholinesterase inhibitor donepezil at 1.0 mg/kg but not 0.5 mg/kg reversed the impairments in choice accuracy and correct response latency. The premature and perseverative over-responding of AMPA lesioned rats remained unchanged. A dose of 0.1 mg/kg WAY 100635 to AMPA-lesioned rats improved their choice accuracy but did not shorten correct response latencies. The number of premature responses was reduced by WAY 100635 but perseverative over-responding was not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

The attentional impairments induced due to cortical cholinergic dysfunction may be ameliorated by cholinergic treatments such as cholinesterase inhibitors. In addition, 5-HT(1A) receptors and the cortical cholinergic system exert balanced opposition in regulating attentional performance in the rat. Blockade of 5-HT(1A) receptors may be useful to treat some aspects of attentional dysfunction in AD.

Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in older people. One of the aims of therapy is to inhibit the breakdown of a chemical neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, by blocking the relevant enzyme. This can be done by a group of chemicals known as cholinesterase inhibitors. However, some (like tacrine) are associated with adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity, but donepezil (E2020, Aricept) is safer.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess whether donepezil improves the well-being of patients with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group's Specialized Register was searched using the terms 'donepezil', 'E2020' and 'Aricept' on 9 October 2002. This Register contains up-to-date records of all major health care databases and many ongoing trial databases. Members of the Donepezil Study Group and Eisai Inc were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All unconfounded, double-blind, randomized controlled trials in which treatment with donepezil was compared with placebo for patients with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer (JSB ), pooled where appropriate and possible, and the weighted mean differences or Peto odds ratios (95%CI) estimated.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials are included, involving 4365 participants. The trials were of 12, 24 or 52 weeks duration in selected patients. Available outcome data cover domains including cognitive function and global clinical state, but data on several important dimensions of outcome are unavailable. For cognition there is a statistically significant improvement for both 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil at 24 weeks compared with placebo (-2.02 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD, 95%CI -2.77 to -1.26, p<0.00001; -2.92 points on the ADAS-Cog scale WMD 95% CI -3.74 to -2.10, p<0.00001)and for 10 mg/day donepezil compared with placebo at 52 weeks (1.84MMSE points, 95% CI, 0.53 to3.15, p=0.006). The results show some improvement in global clinical state (assessed by an independent clinician) in people treated with 5 and 10 mg/day of donepezil compared with placebo at 12 and 24 weeks. Benefits of treatment were also seen on measures of activities of daily living and behaviour. There were significantly more withdrawals before the end of treatment from the 10 mg/day (but not the 5 mg/day) donepezil group compared with placebo which may have resulted in some overestimation of beneficial changes at 10 mg/day.A variety of adverse effects were recorded, with more incidents of nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and anorexia in the 10 mg/day group compared with placebo and the 5 mg/day group, but very few patients left a trial as a direct result of the intervention.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

People with mild, moderate or severe dementia due to Alzheimer's disease treated for periods of 12, 24 or 52 weeks with donepezil experienced benefits in cognitive function, activities of daily living and behaviour. Study clinicians rated global clinical state more positively in treated patients, and measured less decline in measures of global disease severity. Although no significant changes were measured on a patient-rated quality of life scales, the instrument used was crude and possibly unsuited to the task. The additional data now available confirm the findings of the previous issue of this review and extend the evidence for the effectiveness of treatment to at least 52 weeks and to those with severe dementia. More evidence is still needed for the economic efficacy of donepezil, but clinical efficacy is confirmed.

Diffusion of innovations: treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Germany

Systematic barriers seem to slow down the market penetration of innovative acethylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease. The goal of our study was to examine the diffusion of AChE inhibitors into the German market in more detail. On the basis of using the ongoing surveillance panel of the Institute of Medical Statistic (IMS) Health, the prescription patterns of 100 physicians (72 general practitioners, 28 neurologists) were examined. In addition, structured telephone interviews with the same 100 physicians were conducted. The interview included the assessment of a hypothetical treatment situation (i.e. physicians were asked what they would prescribe if a close relative of theirs had Alzheimer's disease) as well as qualitative items examining the physicians' attitudes towards AChE inhibitors and the perceived impact on drug budgets. As a major result, the analysis revealed that neurologists prescribed AChE inhibitors to 44.6% of their patients, while general practitioners only treated 9.0% of their patients with AChE inhibitors. The analysis of the qualitative items revealed positive attitudes regarding the safety and efficacy of AChE inhibitors, but negative attitudes regarding the budgetary limitations to prescribing these drugs. A correlation of r=0.21 (P<0.05) was found between the perceived impact on drug budgets and the adoption of AChE inhibitors and a correlation of r=0.32 (P<0.002) was seen between the physician's specialty and the adoption of AChE inhibitors. These data show that, while the AChE inhibitor adoption process has passed the early stages, various barriers slow down the final stages of AChE inhibitor adoption. The drug budget in particular seems to inhibit the adoption of the innovation by the majority of general practitioners. This leads to a more short-term cost control strategy instead of long-term disease management and cost saving approaches.

New drugs for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease management involves symptomatic drug treatments passed by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Disease modification is now the goal.

AIMS

To review current and developmental drugs for Alzheimer's disease, their usage, and the clinical context of known facts and proposed specific models.

METHOD

A brief evidence-based review was made, using literature where available, or evidence from consensus groups where it was absent.

RESULTS

There is good evidence to support the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, and perhaps vitamin E. Oestrogen and anti-inflammatory agents show possibility, but there is not enough evidence to support routine use.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic treatments exist for Alzheimer's disease. Observational studies and increasing knowledge of brain biology are leading towards further treatment options. Old age psychiatrists have valuable treatments they now have to learn to use.