Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing rhesus alloimmunisation

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

An overview of red blood cell and platelet alloimmunisation in transfusion

Post-transfusion alloimmunisation is the main complication of all those observed after one or more transfusion episodes. Alloimmunisation is observed after the transfusion of red blood cell concentrates but also of platelet concentrates. Besides alloimmunisation due to antigens carried almost exclusively by red blood cells such as those of the Rhesus-Kell system, alloimmunisation often raises against HLA antigens; the main responsibility for that, apart from platelet transfusions, lies with residual leukocytes in the products transfused, hence the central importance of effective leukoreduction right from the blood product preparation stage. Alloimmunization is not restricted to transfusion, but it is also observed during pregnancies, carrying out microtransfusions of blood from the fetus immunizing the mother through the placenta (in a retrograde way). Preexisting maternal-fetal immunization can complicate a transfusion program and intensify the creation of alloantibodies in several blood and tissue group systems. The occurrence of autoantibodies, created by several pathogenic reasons, can also interfere with the propensity of certain recipients of blood components to produce alloantibodies. The genetic condition of individuals is in fact strongly linked to the ability or not to recognize antigenic variants foreign to their own biological program and mount an alloimmune response. Some hemoglobin diseases, in carriers of which transfusions can be iterative and lifelong, are complicated by frequent alloimmunizations and amplification of the complications of these alloimmunizations, imposing even stricter transfusion rules. This review details the mechanisms favoring the occurrence of alloimmunization and the immunological principles for the production of molecular and cellular tools for alloimmunization. It concludes with the main preventive measures available to limit the occurrence of these frequent complications of varying severity but sometimes severe.

Infants affected by Rh sensitization: A 2-year Canadian National Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

Rh sensitization occurs when Rh(D)-negative women develop anti-Rh(D) antibodies following exposure through pregnancy or transfusion. Rh disease may cause jaundice, anemia, neurological impairment, and death. It is rare in countries where Rh Immune Globulin (RhIg) is used. Canadian Rh sensitization and disease rates are unknown.

METHODS

This survey-based study was conducted using a Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program questionnaire sent to Canadian paediatricians and paediatric subspecialists to solicit Rh disease cases from May 2016 to June 2018. Paediatricians reported Rh-positive infants ≤ 60 days of age, born to Rh-negative mothers with RhD sensitization.

RESULTS

Sixty-two confirmed cases of infants affected by Rh(D) sensitization were reported across Canada. The median gestational age of neonates was term, age at presentation was 2 hours, and hemoglobin at presentation was 137.5 g/L (33 to 203 g/L). The median peak bilirubin and phototherapy duration were 280 µmol/L (92 to 771 µmol/L), and 124 hours, respectively. Thirty (48%) infants received Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) (median two doses). Seventeen (27%) received one to three simple transfusions; 10 (16%) required exchange transfusions. Six (10%) infants presented with acute bilirubin encephalopathy, and less than five presented with seizures. Fourteen mothers with affected infants were born outside of Canada.

DISCUSSION

Rh disease continues to exist in Canada. Additional efforts are needed to raise awareness of Rh disease, prevent disease, and minimize sequelae when it does occur. The ongoing global burden of Rh Disease, as well as the possibility of emerging Rh immunoglobulin refusal are among factors that could be taken into consideration in future prevention efforts.

Prenatal non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping: diagnostic accuracy of a test as a guide for appropriate administration of antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Foetal RHD genotyping can be predicted by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using cell-free foetal DNA extracted from maternal plasma. The object of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of non-invasive RHD foetal genotyping, using a commercial multiple-exon assay, as a guide to appropriate administration of targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cell-free foetal DNA was extracted from plasma of RhD-negative women between 11-30 weeks of pregnancy. The foetal RHD genotype was determined non-invasively by qPCR amplification of exons 5, 7 and 10 of the RHD gene using the Free DNA Fetal Kit^® RhD. Results were compared with serological RhD cord blood typing at birth. The analysis of diagnostic accuracy was restricted to the period (24-28⁺⁶ weeks) during which foetal genotyping is usually performed for targeted antenatal immunoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

RHD foetal genotyping was performed on 367 plasma samples (24-28⁺⁶ weeks). Neonatal RhD phenotype results were available for 284 pregnancies. Foetal RHD status was inconclusive in 9/284 (3.2%) samples, including four cases with RhD maternal variants. Two false-positive results were registered. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 94.0-100). The diagnostic accuracy was 99.3% (95% CI: 98.3-100), decreasing to 96.1% (95% CI: 93.9-98.4) when the inconclusive results were included. The negative and positive predictive values were 100% (95% CI: 100-100) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.6-100), respectively. There was one false-negative result in a sample collected at 18 weeks. After inclusion of samples at early gestational age (<23⁺⁶ week), sensitivity and accuracy were 99.6% (95% CI: 98.7-100) and 95.5% (95% CI: 93.3-97.8), respectively.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates that foetal RHD detection on maternal plasma using a commercial multiple-exon assay is a reliable and accurate tool to predict foetal RhD phenotype. It can be a safe guide for the appropriate administration of targeted prenatal immunoprophylaxis.

Sensitivity of fetal RHD screening for safe guidance of targeted anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis: prospective cohort study of a nationwide programme in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVE

 To determine the accuracy of non-invasive fetal testing for the RHD gene in week 27 of pregnancy as part of an antenatal screening programme to restrict anti-D immunoglobulin use to women carrying a child positive for RHD DESIGN:  Prospectively monitoring of fetal RHD testing accuracy compared with serological cord blood typing on introduction of the test. Fetal RHD testing was performed with a duplex real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, with cell-free fetal DNA isolated from 1 mL of maternal plasma The study period was between 4 July 2011 and 7 October 2012. The proportion of women participating in screening was determined.

SETTING

 Nationwide screening programme, the Netherlands. Tests are performed in a centralised setting.

PARTICIPANTS

 25 789 RhD negative pregnant women.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

 Sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate, and false positive rate of fetal RHD testing compared with serological cord blood typing; proportion of technical failures; and compliance to the screening programme.

RESULTS

 A fetal RHD test result and serological cord blood result were available for 25 789 pregnancies. Sensitivity for detection of fetal RHD was 99.94% (95% confidence interval 99.89% to 99.97%) and specificity was 97.74% (97.43% to 98.02%). Nine false negative results for fetal RHD testing were registered (0.03%, 95% confidence interval 0.01% to 0.06%). In two cases these were due to technical failures. False positive fetal RHD testing results were registered for 225 samples (0.87%, 0.76% to 0.99%). Weak RhD expression was shown in 22 of these cases, justifying anti-D immunoglobulin use. The negative and positive predictive values were 99.91% (95% confidence interval 99.82% to 99.95%) and 98.60% (98.40% to 98.77%), respectively. More than 98% of the women participated in the screening programme.

CONCLUSIONS

 Fetal RHD testing in week 27 of pregnancy as part of a national antenatal screening programme is highly reliable and can be used to target both antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin use.

Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive babies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin on the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation when given to Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 May 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment, placebo or a different regimen of anti-D.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two trials involving over 4500 women, comparing anti-D prophylaxis with no anti-D during pregnancy in this review. Overall, the trials were judged to be at moderate to high risk of bias. The quality of the evidence for pre-specified outcomes was also assessed using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.In regards to primary review outcomes, there did not appear to be a clear difference in the risks of immunisation when women who received anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation were compared with women who were not given antenatal anti-D: risk ratio (RR) for incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during pregnancy was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.17, two trials, 3902 women; GRADE: low quality evidence); at birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.42 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.17, two trials, 2297 women); and within 12 months after birth of a Rh-positive infant the average RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.62, two trials, 2048 women; Tau²: 0.47; I²: 39%; GRADE: low quality evidence). Neither of the trials reported on incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation in subsequent pregnancies.Considering secondary outcomes, in one trial, women receiving anti-D during pregnancy were shown to be less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test (which detects fetal cells in maternal blood) in pregnancy (at 32 to 25 weeks) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88; 1884 women; GRADE: low quality evidence) and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.79; 1189 women; GRADE: low quality evidence). No clear differences were seen for neonatal jaundice (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.30; 1882 infants; GRADE: very low quality evidence). Neither of the trials reported on adverse effects associated with anti-D treatment.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Existing studies do not provide conclusive evidence that the use of anti-D during pregnancy benefits either mother or baby in terms of incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during the pregnancy or postpartum, or the incidence of neonatal morbidity (jaundice) (low to very low quality evidence). However women receiving anti-D may be less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test in pregnancy and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (low quality evidence). Fewer women who receive anti-D during pregnancy may have Rhesus D antibodies in a subsequent pregnancy, with benefits for the baby, however this needs to be tested in studies of robust design.

Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD immunisation--outcome of a new antenatal screening and prevention program

Objective

To estimate the incidence of RhD immunisation after implementation of first trimester non-invasive fetal RHD screening to select only RhD negative women carrying RHD positive fetuses for routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP).

Materials and Methods

We present a population-based prospective observational cohort study with historic controls including all maternity care centres and delivery hospitals in the Stockholm region, Sweden. All RhD negative pregnant women were screened for fetal RHD genotype in the first trimester of pregnancy. Anti-D immunoglobulin (250–300 µg) was administered intramuscularly in gestational week 28–30 to participants with RHD positive fetuses. Main outcome measure was the incidence of RhD immunisation developing during or after pregnancy.

Results

During the study period 9380 RhD negative women gave birth in Stockholm. Non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping using cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma was performed in 8374 pregnancies of which 5104 (61%) were RHD positive and 3270 (39%) RHD negative. In 4590 pregnancies with an RHD positive test the women received antenatal anti-D prophylaxis. The incidence of RhD immunisation in the study cohort was 0.26 percent (24/9380) (95% CI 0.15–0.36%) compared to 0.46 percent (86/18546) (95% CI 0.37 to 0.56%) in the reference cohort. The risk ratio (RR) for sensitisation was 0.55 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.87) and the risk reduction was statistically significant (p = 0.009). The absolute risk difference was 0.20 percent, corresponding to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 500.

Conclusions

Using first trimester non-invasive antenatal screening for fetal RHD to target routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis selectively to RhD negative women with RHD positive fetuses significantly reduces the incidence of new RhD immunisation. The risk reduction is comparable to that reported in studies evaluating the outcome of non selective RAADP to all RhD negative women. The cost-effectiveness of this targeted approach remains to be studied.

Anti-D administration after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy, a Rhesus-negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies if her fetus is Rh-positive, which can cause fetal morbidity or mortality in following pregnancies, if untreated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of administering anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) after spontaneous miscarriage in a Rh-negative woman, with no anti-D antibodies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 December 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) in Rh-negative women without antibodies who were given anti-D Ig following spontaneous miscarriage compared with no treatment or placebo treatment following spontaneous miscarriage as control.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and trial quality. Two review authors extracted data and checked it for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one RCT, involving 48 women who had a miscarriage between eight to 24 weeks of gestation. Of the 19 women in the treatment group, 14 had therapeutic dilatation & curettage (D&C) and five had spontaneous miscarriage; of the 29 women in the control group, 25 had therapeutic D&C and four had spontaneous miscarriage. The treatment group received 300 µg anti-D Ig intramuscular injection and were compared with a control group who received 1 cc homogenous gamma globulin placebo.This review's primary outcomes (development of a positive Kleihauer Betke test (a test that detects fetal cells in the maternal blood; and development of RhD alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy) were not reported in the included study.Similarly, none of the review's secondary outcomes were reported in the included study: the need for increased surveillance for suspected fetal blood sampling and fetal transfusions in subsequent pregnancies, neonatal morbidity such as neonatal anaemia, jaundice, bilirubin encephalopathy, erythroblastosis, prematurity, hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) in subsequent pregnancies, maternal adverse events of anti-D administration including anaphylactic reaction and blood-borne infections.The included study did report subsequent Rh-positive pregnancies in three women in the treatment group and six women in the control group. However, due to the small sample size, the study failed to show any difference in maternal sensitisation or development of Rh alloimmunisation in the subsequent pregnancies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient data available to evaluate the practice of anti-D administration in an unsensitised Rh-negative mother after spontaneous miscarriage. Thus, until high-quality evidence becomes available, the practice of anti-D Immunoglobulin prophylaxis after spontaneous miscarriage for preventing Rh alloimmunisation cannot be generalised and should be based on the standard practice guidelines of each country.

Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation

BACKGROUND

During pregnancy, a Rhesus negative (Rh-negative) woman may develop antibodies when her fetus is Rhesus positive (Rh-positive). These antibodies may harm Rh-positive babies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin on the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunisation when given to Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 September 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in Rh-negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment, placebo or a different regimen of anti-D.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Two trials with moderate to high risk of bias, involving over 4500 women, compared anti-D prophylaxis with no anti-D during pregnancy. When women received anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks' gestation, risks of immunisation were not significantly different than for women not given antenatal anti-D: risk ratio (RR) of immunisation during pregnancy was 0.42 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15 to 1.17); after the birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.42 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.17); and within 12 months after birth of a Rh-positive infant the RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.62).However, women receiving anti-D during pregnancy were significantly less likely to register a positive Kleihauer test (which detects fetal cells in maternal blood) in pregnancy (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88) and at the birth of a Rh-positive infant (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.79). No data were available for the risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. No significant differences were seen for neonatal jaundice, and no adverse effects were reported in either trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The risk of Rhesus D alloimmunisation during or immediately after a first pregnancy is about 1%. Administration of 100 µg (500 IU) anti-D to women in their first pregnancy can reduce this risk to about 0.2% without, to date, any adverse effects. Although unlikely to confer benefit in the current pregnancy, fewer women may have Rhesus D antibodies in any subsequent pregnancy, but the effects of this needs to be tested in studies of robust design.

A case of pregnancy with Rhesus antibody and bicornuate uterus - a favourable outcome: a case report

Introduction

In 1% of Rhesus negative women sensitisation occurs without any overt sensitising event during pregnancy. This accounts for late immunisation during a first pregnancy and is responsible for 18-27% of cases of alloimmunisation. The incidence of congenital uterine anomalies in a fertile population is 3.2% of which 5% are bicornuate uterus. Bicornuate uterus can lead to early miscarriages, preterm labor, fetal growth retardation and congenital malformations.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old lady in her first pregnancy developed Anti-D antibodies at 28 weeks of gestation without any known sensitising event. In view of increasing anti-D titres, at 36 weeks she was delivered. Incidentally during caesarean section she was found to have bicornuate uterus. The neonate was treated with phototherapy and blood transfusion following delivery.

Conclusion

Rhesus antibodies when managed by close monitoring and timely delivery can lead to favourable outcome. Bicornuate uterus does not always lead to complications like miscarriage, growth retardation or preterm labour and does not need any special intervention.

Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for Rhesus D (RhD) immunisation in pregnancy, despite adequate antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis in the previous pregnancy. To generate evidence for improved primary prevention by extra administration of anti-D Ig in the presence of a risk factor.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Nation-wide evaluation of the Dutch antenatal anti-D-prophylaxis programme.

POPULATION

CASES

42 RhD-immunised parae-1, recognised by first-trimester routine red cell antibody screening in their current pregnancy, who received antenatal and postnatal anti-D Ig prophylaxis (gifts of 1000 iu) in their first pregnancy.

CONTROLS

339 parae-1 without red cell antibodies.

METHODS

Data were collected via obstetric care workers and/or personal interviews with women.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Significant risk factors for RhD immunisation in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors were non-spontaneous delivery (assisted vaginal delivery or caesarean section) (OR 2.23; 95% CI:1.04-4.74), postmaturity (>or=42 weeks of completed gestation: OR 3.07; 95% CI:1.02-9.02), pregnancy-related red blood cell transfusion (OR 3.51; 95% CI:0.97-12.7 and age (OR 0.89/year; 95% CI:0.80-0.98). In 43% of cases, none of the categorical risk factors was present.

CONCLUSIONS

In at least half of the failures of anti-D Ig prophylaxis, a condition related to increased fetomaternal haemorrhage (FMH) and/or insufficient anti-D Ig levels was observed. Hence, RhD immunisation may be further reduced by strict compliance to guidelines concerning determination of FMH and accordingly adjusted anti-D Ig prophylaxis, or by routine administration of extra anti-D Ig after a non-spontaneous delivery and/or a complicated or prolonged third stage of labour.

Cell-free fetal DNA levels in maternal plasma after elective first-trimester termination of pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To determine if first-trimester elective termination of pregnancy affects cell-free fetal DNA (fDNA) levels in maternal plasma.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Clinical and academic research centers.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred thirty-four women who underwent first-trimester elective termination procedures.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and measurement of DYS1, a Y-chromosome sequence, was used as a marker of fDNA.

RESULT(S)

We detected fDNA in pretermination samples from 27 out of 71 patients in the surgical arm, and 29 out of 63 patients in the medical arm. Based on confirmation of male gender in placental tissue, the sensitivity of fDNA detection is 92.6%. We detected fDNA as early as 32 days of gestation, which increased 4.2 genome equivalents/mL/week. In the surgical arm, the mean level of posttermination fDNA, adjusted for the clearance of fDNA in maternal blood, was higher than projected based on an expected increase with gestational age. In the medical arm, six patients had increased fDNA levels up to 11 days following termination.

CONCLUSION(S)

We found that fDNA can be reliably quantified in the early first trimester; fDNA elevation that occurs shortly after surgical termination may reflect fetomaternal hemorrhage or destruction of trophoblastic villi. Continued elevation of fDNA for several days may occur following medical termination.

Quantification of fetomaternal hemorrhage by fluorescence microscopy is equivalent to flow cytometry

BACKGROUND

The quantification of fetal cells in the maternal circulation remains an important goal to determine the amount of anti-D necessary to prevent active immunization of a D- mother giving birth to a D+ baby. Underestimation of fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) results in inefficient anti-D prophylaxis and maternal immunization; overestimation of FMH results in higher doses of passively transferred anti-D, higher costs, and the risk of disease transmission. Thus, a reliable method to quantitatively assess FMH is necessary.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Serial dilutions of artificial FMH were quantitatively measured by three different methods: flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy (each after anti-D staining), and by the Kleihauer-Betke test. The accuracy and precision of the three methods were compared by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were comparably accurate and precise in quantifying FMH. In contrast, the accuracy of the Kleihauer-Betke test was poor, resulting in substantial overestimation of FMH in the samples with lower fetal cell concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Anti-D flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy for detection of fetal cells offer equally reliable and precise methods in contrast to the Kleihauer-Betke test. Fluorescence microscopy may be established as standard to quantify FMH in clinical practice because it is comparable to flow cytometry; in addition, it is time saving and is less expensive.

Anti-D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus alloimmunisation

BACKGROUND

The development of Rh immunisation and its prophylactic use since the 1970s has meant that severe Rhesus D (RhD) alloimmunisation is now rarely seen.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effects of giving anti-D to Rhesus negative women, with no anti-D antibodies, who had given birth to a Rhesus positive infant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE (from 1966 to January 1999) and reference lists of relevant articles. Date of last search of Cochrane Controlled Trials Register: January 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in Rhesus negative women without antibodies who were given anti-D immunoglobulin postpartum compared with no treatment or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessments of inclusion criteria, trial quality and data extraction were done by each author independently. Initial analyses included all trials. Other analyses assessed the effect of trial quality, ABO compatibility and dose.

MAIN RESULTS

Six eligible trials compared postpartum anti-D prophylaxis with no treatment or placebo. The trials involved over 10,000 women, but trial quality varied. Anti-D lowered the incidence of RhD alloimmunisation six months after birth (relative risk 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.06), and in a subsequent pregnancy (relative risk 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0. 07 to 0.23). These benefits were seen regardless of the ABO status of the mother and baby and when anti-D was given within 72 hours of birth. Higher doses (up to 200 micro grams) were more effective than lower doses (up to 50 micro grams) in preventing RhD alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Anti-D, given within 72 hours after childbirth, reduces the risk of RhD alloimmunisation in Rhesus negative women who have given birth to a Rhesus positive infant. However the evidence on the optimal dose is limited.

Anti-D administration in pregnancy for preventing rhesus alloimmunisation

BACKGROUND

A woman may develop Rh-negative antibodies during her first pregnancy when her fetus is Rh-positive. Antibodies develop most frequently after the 28th week of gestation.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to asses the effects of giving antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin at 28 weeks or more of pregnancy on the incidence of RhD alloimmunisation when given to Rhesus negative mothers without anti-D antibodies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and bibliographies. Date of last search: December 1998.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in Rhesus negative women without anti-D antibodies given anti-D after 28 weeks of pregnancy, compared with no treatment or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and double entered.

MAIN RESULTS

Two eligible trials, which involved over 4500 women, compared anti-D prophylaxis with no treatment. Although the data suggested, when women receive anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks gestation, a reduced incidence of immunisation during pregnancy (0R O.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.12), after the birth of a Rhesus positive infant (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.18-1.12), and within 12 months after birth of a Rhesus positive infant (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.01), none of these differences were statistically significant. In the trial, which used the larger dose of anti-D (100ug; 500IU), there was a clear reduction in the incidence of immunisation at 2-12 months following birth in women who had received Anti-D at 28 and 34 weeks (OR 0.22 95% CI 0.05-0.88). No data were available for the risk of RhD alloimmunisation in a subsequent pregnancy. No differences were observed in the incidence of neonatal jaundice.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The risk of RhD alloimmunisation during or immediately after a first pregnancy is about 1.5%. Administration of 100ug (500IU) anti-D at 28 weeks and 34 weeks gestation to women in their first pregnancy can reduce this risk to about 0.2% without, to date, any adverse effects. Although such a policy is unlikely to confer benefit or improve outcome in the present pregnancy, fewer women will have Rhesus D antibodies in their next pregnancy. Adoption of such a policy will need to consider the costs of prophylaxis against the costs of care for women who become sensitised and their affected infants, and local adequacy of supply of anti-D gammaglobulin.