Timed intercourse versus intra-uterine insemination with or without ovarian hyperstimulation for subfertility in men

Clinical success of IUI cycles with donor sperm is not affected by total inseminated volume: a RCT

STUDY QUESTION

What is the impact on live birth rates (LBR) when a donor IUI (dIUI) cycle is performed with an insemination volume of 0.5 mL versus the usual 0.2 mL?

SUMMARY ANSWER

LBR after a dIUI cycle is no different when performed with 0.5 versus 0.2 mL.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

An IUI has an important role in the treatment of severe male infertility, and is often used in same-sex female couples and single parents. Different variables have been studied to determine factors correlated with clinical outcomes (IUI scheduling, ovarian stimulation, sperm parameters) but little is known about the inseminated volume. The use of conical bottom test tubes could contribute substantially to the loss of inseminated spermatozoa because it precludes the total recovery of the sample. Additionally, the insemination catheter could uphold this reduction causing sperm adhesion on the inner walls of the insemination catheter, decreasing even more the total inseminated volume. It is expected that utilizing an IUI approach that increases sperm volume in the fallopian tubes (0.5 mL rather than 0.2 mL) at the time of ovulation will lead to higher LBRs. To avoid bias related to sperm quality, the study population was restricted to dIUI cycles.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE AND DURATION

A parallel-group, double-blinded, RCT, including patients undergoing natural or stimulated dIUI, was performed between March 2013 and April 2015. dIUI cycles (n = 293) were randomized through a computer-generated list to undergo insemination with 0.2 mL (control group) or 0.5 mL (study group), of which 24 were excluded (protocol deviation) and 269 received the allocated intervention. Patients with the presence of tubal factor infertility, grades III-IV endometriosis, >3 previous dIUI cycles or with ≥3 follicles >14 mm were excluded. The study was designed with 80% power to detect a 5% difference in LBR with a reference of 15% and a two-tailed 5% significance level. The required sample size was 118 per group.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING AND METHOD

There were 143 cycles (0.2 mL group) and 126 cycles (0.5 mL group). The primary end-point of the trial was LBR per dIUI cycle in both treatment groups. Clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were evaluated as secondary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

No adverse events were reported during the study trial. Study groups (0.2 versus 0.5 mL, respectively) were similar in age (35.8 ± 3.9 versus 35.4 ± 4.0 years: mean±SD), and had similar anti-Mullerian hormone levels (2.2 ± 1.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.5 ng/mL), basal antral follicle count (13.2 ± 6.4 versus 13.6 ± 6.0), BMI (23.5 ± 3.9 versus 23.7 ± 4.1 kg/m2), number of follicles >17 mm (1.1 ± 0.5 versus 1.1 ± 0.5), total gonadotrophin dose (553.1 ± 366.3 versus 494.6 ± 237.1 IU), and total motile sperm count (8.22 ± 7.1 versus 7.7 ± 5.7 million). Similar clinical pregnancy rates (18.9% (27/143) versus 19.8% (25/126), NS), LBRs (15.4% (22/143) versus 19.0% (24/126), NS) and miscarriage rates (18.5% (5/27) versus 4.0% (1/25), NS) were observed between groups.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study was not powered to detect differences in the secondary outcomes, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates. The randomization was performed at the dIUI cycle level, therefore, the results are reported as success rate per dIUI cycle rather than per patient.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first RCT to show that the inseminated volume is not correlated with the probability of a live birth. The miscarriage rate was higher in the 0.2 mL group, although this difference was not statistically significant. If the lower miscarriage rate observed in the 0.5 mL group is confirmed, this could be related to the presence of uterine contractions similar of those generated during sexual intercourse, which may be implicated in the inception of early biochemical embryo-endometrium communication.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors declare having no conflict of interest with regard to this trial. No funding was received for this study. This research was performed under the auspices of 'Càtedra d'Investigació en Obstetrícia I Ginecologia' of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hospital Universitari Quiron-Dexeus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03006523).

Effect of Gonadotropin Types and Indications on Homologous Intrauterine Insemination Success: A Study from 1251 Cycles and a Review of the Literature

Objective

To evaluate the IUI success factors relative to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and infertility type, this retrospective cohort study included 1251 couples undergoing homologous IUI.

Results

We achieved 13% clinical pregnancies and 11% live births. COS and infertility type do not have significant effect on IUI clinical outcomes with unstable intervention of various couples' parameters, including the female age, the IUI attempt rank, and the sperm quality.

Conclusion

Further, the COS used seemed a weak predictor for IUI success; therefore, the indications need more discussion, especially in unexplained infertility cases involving various factors. Indeed, the fourth IUI attempt, the female age over 40 years, and the total motile sperm count <5 × 10⁶ were critical in decreasing the positive clinical outcomes of IUI. Those parameter cut-offs necessitate a larger analysis to give infertile couples more chances through IUI before carrying out other ART techniques.

Ovarian stimulated cycle: not a better alternative for women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination

To explore the related factors on the clinical pregnancy outcome in intrauterine insemination, a retrospective study was conducted on the clinical data of 580 cycles for 301 infertile couples who were treated with intrauterine insemination. The female age, male age, duration of infertility, treatment protocols, endometrial thickness and sperm parameters were compared between pregnant group and non-pregnant group. The results showed that there were statistical differences in female age, duration of infertility and endometrial thickness between the two groups. The pregnancy rate was 19.34% in Group A (female age ≤ 30 y) compared with 10.91% in Group B (female age > 30 y). The pregnancy rate was 18.44% when the duration of infertility ≤ 2 years, which was higher than another group 10.73% when the duration of infertility > 2 years. Group analysis according to endometrial thickness (Group1: < 8 mm; Group 2: ≥ 8 mm and ≤ 12 mm; Group 3: > 12 mm) demonstrated significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate (7.41%, 18.00% and 11.48% respectively). For those infertile female without ovulation failure, the higher clinical pregnancy rates were observed in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination in natural cycle 16.12% when compared with the patients in ovarian stimulated cycles 10.48%. Thus, we demonstrate that the pregnancy rate is related with female age, duration of infertility and endometrial thickness. The ovarian stimulated cycle couldn’t improve the pregnancy outcome for those women without ovulation disorder in intrauterine insemination.

Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility

BACKGROUND

Intra-uterine insemination (IUI), in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are frequently used fertility treatments for couples with male subfertility. The use of these treatments has been subject of discussion. Knowledge on the effectiveness of fertility treatments for male subfertility with different grades of severity is limited. Possibly, couples are exposed to unnecessary or ineffective treatments on a large scale.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different fertility treatments (expectant management, timed intercourse (TI), IUI, IVF and ICSI) for couples whose subfertility appears to be due to abnormal sperm parameters.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for all publications that described randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the treatment for male subfertility. We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the National Research Register from inception to 14 April 2015, and web-based trial registers from January 1985 to April 2015. We applied no language restrictions. We checked all references in the identified trials and background papers and contacted authors to identify relevant published and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing different treatment options for male subfertility. These were expectant management, TI (with or without ovarian hyperstimulation (OH)), IUI (with or without OH), IVF and ICSI. We included only couples with abnormal sperm parameters.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. They resolved disagreements by discussion with the rest of the review authors. We performed statistical analyses in accordance with the guidelines for statistical analysis developed by The Cochrane Collaboration. The quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE methods. Primary outcomes were live birth and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) per couple randomised.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included 10 RCTs (757 couples). The quality of the evidence was low or very low for all comparisons. The main limitations in the evidence were failure to describe study methods, serious imprecision and inconsistency. IUI versus TI (five RCTs)Two RCTs compared IUI with TI in natural cycles. There were no data on live birth or OHSS. We found no evidence of a difference in pregnancy rates (2 RCTs, 62 couples: odds ratio (OR) 4.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 102, very low quality evidence; there were no events in one of the studies).Three RCTs compared IUI with TI both in cycles with OH. We found no evidence of a difference in live birth rates (1 RCT, 81 couples: OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.59; low quality evidence) or pregnancy rates (3 RCTs, 202 couples: OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.74 to 3.07; I(2) = 11%, very low quality evidence). One RCT reported data on OHSS. None of the 62 women had OHSS.One RCT compared IUI in cycles with OH with TI in natural cycles. We found no evidence of a difference in live birth rates (1 RCT, 44 couples: OR 3.14, 95% CI 0.12 to 81.35; very low quality evidence). Data on OHSS were not available. IUI in cycles with OH versus IUI in natural cycles (five RCTs)We found no evidence of a difference in live birth rates (3 RCTs, 346 couples: OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.33; I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence) and pregnancy rates (4 RCTs, 399 couples: OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.82; I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence). There were no data on OHSS. IVF versus IUI in natural cycles or cycles with OH (two RCTs)We found no evidence of a difference in live birth rates between IVF versus IUI in natural cycles (1 RCT, 53 couples: OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.35; low quality evidence) or IVF versus IUI in cycles with OH (2 RCTs, 86 couples: OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.45; I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence). One RCT reported data on OHSS. None of the women had OHSS.Overall, we found no evidence of a difference between any of the groups in rates of live birth, pregnancy or adverse events (multiple pregnancy, miscarriage). However, most of the evidence was very low quality.There were no studies on IUI in natural cycles versus TI in stimulated cycles, IVF versus TI, ICSI versus TI, ICSI versus IUI (with OH) or ICSI versus IVF.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence to determine whether there was any difference in safety and effectiveness between different treatments for male subfertility. More research is needed.

Outcomes after intrauterine insemination are independent of provider type

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) varies based on the type of health care provider performing the procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study set at an infertility clinic at an academic institution. The patients who comprised this study were 1575 women who underwent 3475 IUI cycles from late 2003 through early 2012. Cycles were stratified into 3 groups according to the type of provider who performed the procedure: attending physician, fellow physician, or registered nurse (RN). The primary outcome was live birth. Additional outcomes of interest included positive pregnancy test and clinical pregnancy. Repeated measures log binomial regression was used to estimate the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the outcomes and to evaluate the effect of potential confounders. All tests were 2-sided, and P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 3475 IUI cycles, 2030 (58.4%) were gonadotropin stimulated, 929 (26.7%) were clomiphene citrate stimulated, and 516 (14.9%) were natural. The incidences of clinical pregnancy and live birth among all cycles were 11.8% and 8.8%, respectively. After adjusting for female age, male partner age, and cycle type, the incidence of live birth was similar for RNs compared with attending physicians (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.58-1.1) and fellow physicians compared with attending physicians (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.2). Similar results were seen for positive pregnancy test and clinical pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in live birth following IUI cycles in which the procedure was performed by a fellow physician or RN compared with an attending physician.

Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pregnancy outcomes in the setting of a single- vs. double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment cycle.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large, private assisted reproductive technology practice.

PATIENT(S)

Donor sperm IUI recipients.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

There were 2,486 double and 673 single-donor sperm IUI cycles. The two groups were similar for age, body mass index, and the number of prior cycles. The clinical pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups (single: 16.4% vs. double: 13.6%). In univariate regression analysis, age, total motile sperm, and diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) were associated with pregnancy. Generalized estimating equation models accounting for repeated measures, age, DOR and total motile sperm and the interactions of these factors demonstrated that single and double IUI had similar odds of pregnancy (odds ratio 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-1.44). Pregnancy rates remained similar between the two groups in matched comparison and other subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION(S)

Single and double-donor IUI cycles had similar clinical pregnancy rates. This large data set did not demonstrate a benefit to routine double IUI in donor sperm cycles.

Comparison of different starting gonadotropin doses (50, 75 and 100 IU daily) for ovulation induction combined with intrauterine insemination

Purpose

To prevent multiple pregnancies the goal of ovulation induction by gonadotropins is to achieve only mono-follicular development. The most important issue is therefore to determine the starting dose. The aim of this study is to compare three different starting doses of follitropin beta to assess the lowest effective dose.

Methods

We evaluated 92 cycles with ovarian stimulation for patients with unexplained infertility, anovulatory disorder or mild male factor. We prospectively divided patients into 50, 75 and 100 IU groups based on patients’ response to clomiphene citrate treatment.

Results

We performed 87 intrauterine inseminations (95 % of cycles with ovulation induction). Five cycles were cancelled. We achieved 15 pregnancies; total pregnancy rate was 18 %. Pregnancy rate was 22, 10 and 28 % in 50, 75 and 100 IU follitropin beta groups. The average number of follicles was 2.0 ± 0.8, 2.2 ± 1.1 and 2.5 ± 1.8 (ns), total dose of gonadotropins (IU) 483 ± 192, 600 ± 151 and 830 ± 268 (p < 0.001), respectively. We observed one case of twins in 75 and 100 IU treatment group, as well (25 % risk).

Conclusions

This study suggests that based on the dose which was chosen according to clomiphene citrate response, all treatment regimes were effective for ovulation induction. 50 IU of follitropin beta daily is the appropriate starting dose to support ovulation for clomiphene citrate-sensitive women. The disadvantage may be an increased risk of cycle cancellation due to low ovarian response. Daily doses 75 or 100 IU of rFSH increase total consumption of gonadotropins.

The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings

Objective. There is an asymmetric allocation of technology and other resources for infertility services. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a process of placing washed spermatozoa transcervically into the uterine cavity for treatment of infertility. This is a review of literature for the potential use of IUI as a basic infertility treatment in technology-limited settings. Study design. Review of articles on treatment of infertility using IUI. Results. Aspects regarding the use of IUI are reviewed, including ovarian stimulation, semen parameters associated with good outcomes, methods of sperm preparation, timing of IUI, and number of inseminations. Implications of the finding in light of the needs of low-technology medical settings are summarized. Conclusion. The reviewed evidence suggests that IUI is less expensive, less invasive, and comparably effective for selected patients as a first-line treatment for couples with unexplained or male factor infertility. Those couples may be offered three to six IUI cycles in technology-limited settings.

Intrauterine insemination in natural cycle may give better results in older women

BACKGROUND

Controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation (COH) in combination with intrauterine insemination (IUI) has been shown to result in significantly higher pregnancy rates compared to un-stimulated (natural cycle) IUI. This may however not be true in all ages.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study and analysed data collected prospectively on 1759 IUI cycles in couples with unexplained infertility. The results were analysed to show the outcome of IUI with COH, and IUI in natural cycle (unstimulated), in younger women compared to their older counterparts.

RESULTS

In women age 37 and younger, COH resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (13.0% vs 6.5%) and live-birth rate (10.7% vs 5.2%) compared to natural cycle IUI (p = 0.025, p = 0.045 respectively). However for older women age >37 years, natural cycle (unstimulated) IUI, resulted in a significantly higher pregnancy rate (12.0% vs 8.5%) live-birth rate (7.5%vs 3.5%) than IUI with COH ((p = 0.0037). This difference is even more significant when COH was performed with clomiphene citrate (7.5% vs 2.1%) (p = 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

COH was associated with a lower live birth rate in older women, irrespective of the agent used, and it seems to be worse when the anti-oestrogenic drug clomiphene citrate was used for COH. Older women may benefit more from natural cycle (unstimulated) IUI. A randomised controlled trial is required to confirm this observation.

A randomized clinical trial of clomiphene citrate versus low dose recombinant FSH for ovarian hyperstimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles for unexplained and male subfertility

BACKGROUND

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a widely accepted treatment for unexplained and male subfertility. No consensus exists about the drug of first choice to be used as hyperstimulation. This randomized multicentre trial using a parallel design compares the efficacy of clomiphene citrate (CC) with that of recombinant FSH (rFSH).

METHODS

Couples with primary unexplained or male subfertility were randomized to receive CC or rFSH for ovarian hyperstimulation. The treatment was continued for up to four cycles unless pregnancy occurred. Cycles with more than three follicles were cancelled. Cumulative pregnancy rates and live birth rates were primary outcomes. Cancellation during treatment and multiple birth rates are secondary outcomes. Results were analysed following the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Seventy couples with male subfertility and 68 couples with unexplained subfertility were included. Seventy-one women received CC, and 67 received rFSH. Twenty-seven pregnancies were observed in the CC group (38%) and 23 in the rFSH group (34.3%) relative risk (RR) 1.11 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.71-1.73]. The live birth rate was 28.2% (20/71) and 26.9% (18/67) for CC and rFSH, respectively, RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.61-1.80). Overall, the live birth rates per cycle were 10% for CC-stimulated and 8.7% for rFSH stimulated cycles. The total multiple pregnancy rate was 6.0%. Thirty-five cycles (8.6%) were cancelled because of four or more follicles (CC, n = 17; rFSH, n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

In couples with primary unexplained or male subfertility participating in an IUI program, ovarian hyperstimulation can be achieved by CC or rFSH. No significant difference in live birth rates between CC and rFSH was observed. Being less expensive, CC seems the more cost-effective drug and therefore, can be offered as drug of first choice.

Should We Continue Performing Intrauterine Inseminations in the Year 2004?

This review summarizes the existing evidence regarding intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a treatment for cervical hostility, male and unexplained subfertility. IUI in natural cycles has been proven effective in patients with cervical hostility and moderate male subfertility. IUI in cycles with mild ovarian hyperstimulation (MOH) should be the treatment of choice in couples with mild male subfertilty (average total motile sperm count above 10 million) and unexplained subfertilty. When MOH is applied, gonadotropins have been proven more effective compared with clomiphene citrate. Further large trials comparing clomiphene citrate with gonadotropins are mandatory. Prevention of multiple pregnancies in MOH/IUI programs is of paramount importance. A strategy with a low-dose step-up protocol and strict cancellation criteria is proposed. When multiple pregnancies are kept to a minimum, MOH/IUI is more cost-effective compared with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Future research should focus on prediction models to predict the outcome of MOH/IUI treatment for individual couples before starting treatment.

Female age in ART: when to stop?

With increasing age the probability of ongoing pregnancy established by the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART) decreases. As a result the question arises whether age limits for the application of ART should be established. From a literature review and ongoing research data it appears that the costs per child born greatly increase after the age of 40 for both intrauterine insemination with mild ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilisation treatment, while in cases of 44 and over, prognosis is flat zero. The willingness to pay for extra costs will greatly determine whether and at what age strict limits should be applied. Fortunately, predictive factors for success, like the antral follicle count, may enable the identification of women over 40 and under 44 that still have favourable prospects, thereby decreasing the necessary costs per childbirth and allowing couples into ART programs that are often denied based solely on female age.

Intra-uterine Insemination in Farm Animals and Humans

Artificial insemination (AI) is the oldest and currently most common technique in the assisted reproduction of animals and humans. The introduction of AI in farm animals was forced by sanitary reasons and the first large-scale applications with a commercial goal were performed in cattle in the late 1930s of last century. After the Second World War, cryopreservation of semen facilitated distribution and AI was mainly performed for economic reasons, especially in dairy cattle industry. In humans however, AI was initially performed in cases of physiological and psychological sexual dysfunction, but later on also in cases of infertility caused by immunological problems. Currently, the most common indications for intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in humans are unexplained infertility and male subfertility. In these cases, IUI is considered as the treatment of the first choice, before more invasive techniques such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) are used. In contrast with humans, the quantity and quality of semen produced by farm animals is much higher and permits dilution and production of several insemination doses per ejaculate. However, with the introduction of sex-sorted semen in farm animals, the same problem of low-quality semen as in humans has arisen. In cattle, pigs and horses, conventional insemination with low numbers of sex-sorted spermatozoa results in a significant decrease in fertility. To improve the fertility rates with this semen, new insemination techniques have been developed in order to deposit spermatozoa closer to the site of fertilization. In sows and mares the advantage of utero-tubal junction (UTJ) insemination has already been proven; however, in cattle it is still under investigation. In this review, the differences and similarities in the application of AI between animals and humans are discussed and as AI in farm animals is most successful in cattle, the situation in this species is elaborated the most.