Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men

Are varicoceles the holy grail of Andrology?

Varicoceles are a common condition affecting up to 15% of men in the general population, and up to 40% of men with infertility. A varicocele is an abnormal dilation of the veins within the scrotum, which can lead to reduced sperm production and testicular damage, resulting in infertility. Despite the prevalence of varicoceles, much remains to be discovered about their diagnosis, treatment, and long-term impact. Varicoceles are considered the 'holy grail' of Andrology because they represent a complex, multifactorial condition that requires a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and treatment. While surgical repair of varicoceles has been shown to improve fertility outcomes in some cases, there is still debate about the best approach to diagnosis and treatment, and long-term outcomes are not well understood. Advances in diagnostic imaging, such as color Doppler ultrasound, have improved our ability to identify varicoceles, but more research is needed to fully understand the impact of this condition on male fertility and overall health. As such, varicoceles represent an ongoing area of investigation in Andrology with much progress to be made in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and long-term impact.

Microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in treatment of men with primary and secondary infertility (retrospective study)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Varicocele is the most common treatable cause of male infertility. The study aimed to compare varicocelectomy efficacy in men with primary (PI) and secondary infertility (SI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 100 men suffering from PI and SI and having varicocelectomy at the Republican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Urology were retrospectively selected and analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group I included 58 men with PI and Group II 42 men with SI. Preoperative clinical characteristics and semen parameters before and after varicocelectomy were analyzed and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed that the mean age of patients of group I was significantly lower (p<0.001) and the duration of infertility was accurately shorter (p<0.01) than those of group II. Main semen parameters increased significantly in group I (e.g., sperm concentration increased by 50%, from 62.2 ± 8.7 to 93.5 ± 10.0 M/ml, and total motile sperm count increased by 113%, from 76.7±17.1 to 163.4±27.8 M p<0.05), while in group II only rate of progressive motile sperm increased significantly (by 107%, from 13.5± .6 to 28.0±5.2% p<0.05). We identified a significant difference in varicocelectomy efficacy between group I and group II in change of total motile sperm count (by 113% vs 74% respectively, p<0.01). We also revealed a discrepancy between groups in correlation ratio (r) between initial and post-surgical percent of progressive motile sperm.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SI were older and had longer infertility period. Varicocelectomy resulted in significant semen parameters improvement in patients with PI. In patients with SI, only a percent of progressively motile sperm improved significantly. It indicates that advanced male age and long infertility duration may have a negative impact on varicocelectomy success.

Effects of smoking on varicocelectomy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of smoking on semen parameters and spontaneous pregnancy development by comparing smoker and non-smoker varicocelectomy patients.

METHODS

This study included 63 male patients with primary infertility for at least one year, and underwent microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy at the Erzurum City Hospital urology clinic between 2020 and 2023. Patient files were retrospectively evaluated, and 27 patients were assigned to smoker group, whereas 36 patients were assigned to non-smoker group. Demographic data, semen parameters, spontaneous pregnancy development and timing were compared between two groups.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed in age, partner's age, BMI, clinical presentation, varicocele grade, side of varicocele, testicular volume, or testicular vein diameters (p > 0.05). The mean age of the study group was determined to be 30.7 ± 4.9 years. In the non-smoker group, 27 patients (75%) had only subfertility complaints, while 9 patients (25%) also experienced scrotal pain. Progressive motility was significantly higher in the non-smoker group at the 3rd month (28.11 ± 5.78 vs. 24.51 ± 4.24, p < 0.05) and 6th month (29.61 ± 5.16 vs. 26.22 ± 4.14, p < 0.05) evaluations. When comparing the rates of pregnancy development, the non-smoker group was determined to have a higher rate (53%), but this comparison was not statistically significant. (p < 0.05) Regarding the timing of pregnancy, the non-smoker group was associated with earlier spontaneous pregnancy. (5.84 ± 2.26 vs. 9.20 ± 2.30, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Smoking negatively affects the outcomes of varicocelectomy in terms of semen parameters, spontaneous pregnancy development and timing. Prospective, randomized, and larger sample-sized studies are required on this subject.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Ataturk University Local Ethics Committee (approval number: B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/234).

Varicoceles: Overview of Treatment from a Radiologic and Surgical Perspective

A testicular varicocele is the result of the expansion of the venous pampiniform plexus of the scrotum. Often painless, a significant number of patients experience orchialgia, swelling, testicular atrophy, and abnormalities in spermatic parameters. Treatment of symptomatic varicocele involves a radiologic or surgical intervention to obstruct the reflux of venous drainage. Testicular anatomy, diagnostic evaluation and imaging, options for surgical intervention, and a step-by-step description of retrograde embolization and antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy are discussed. Furthermore, included is an overview of postprocedural management and patient outcomes for radiological interventions, and the most up-to-date evidence on the efficacy of varicocele treatments as well as how they compare to each other.

Management of male factor infertility: position statement from the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) : Endorsing Organization: Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR)

PURPOSE

Infertility affects 15-20% of couples and male factors are present in about half of the cases. For many aspects related to the diagnostic and therapeutic approach of male factor infertility, there is no general consensus, and the clinical approach is not uniform.

METHODS

In the present document by the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS), endorsed by the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction, and Research (SIERR), we propose evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of male factor infertility to improve patient and couple care.

RESULTS

Components of the initial evaluation should include at minimum medical history, physical examination, and semen analysis. Semen microbiological examination, endocrine assessment, and imaging are suggested in most men and recommended when specific risk factors for infertility exist or first-step analyses showed abnormalities. Full examination including genetic tests, testicular cytology/histology, or additional tests on sperm is clinically oriented and based on the results of previous investigations. For treatment purposes, the identification of the specific cause and the pathogenetic mechanism is advisable. At least, distinguishing pre-testicular, testicular, and post-testicular forms is essential. Treatment should be couple-oriented, including lifestyle modifications, etiologic therapies, empirical treatments, and ART on the basis of best evidence and with a gradual approach.

CONCLUSION

These Guidelines are based on two principal aspects: they are couple-oriented and place high value in assessing, preventing, and treating risk factors for infertility. These Guidelines also highlighted that male infertility and in particular testicular function might be a mirror of general health of a man.

Functional histology of human scrotal wall layers and their overlooked relation with infertility: a narrative review

Male infertility currently contributes to nearly half of the reported infertility cases. Scrotal wall layers play a cardinal role in regulating testicular physiology. However, few studies have focused on the functional histology of these layers and their relations with infertility in humans. The objective of the present narrative review is to collate novel insights into the functional histology of the human scrotal wall layers and their relation with infertility. The data was extracted from articles published between 1946 and 2021. The study was performed between January and December 2021. 71 original studies have been included in this review. Despite the fact that few studies have presented detailed functional histology of the human scrotal wall layers, this narrative review elucidates the possible influence of scrotal histology on infertility. Scrotal wall layers-associated pathologies may induce infertility by various mechanisms. They can impose mechanical forces that may affect the testicular histology and stimulate testicular inflammation. Moreover, they may induce testicular hyperthermia. Various unanswered clinical questions have been identified in this narrative review. More clinical studies are needed to assess the effect of alterations in the components of the scrotal wall layers on fertility (e.g., due to the exposure to metabolic and/or psychological stressors). In addition, testing the effectiveness of various pharmacological/surgical interventions to treat scrotal wall layers-associated pathologies will provide more insights into infertility treatment.