Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus, and affects around 10% of people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. High doses of corticosteroids are the main treatment for ABPA; although the long-term benefits are not clear, and their many side effects are well-documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against A fumigatus, and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, amphotericin B, has been used in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with A fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

The review aimed to test the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); and 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, we planned to assess the optimal type, duration, and dose of antifungal therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals, and abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register was 28 September 2021. We searched ongoing trials registries, most recently on 11 March 2022. Earlier, we also approached pharmaceutical companies regarding possible unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials, in which antifungal treatments were compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment were used in the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The searches identified six trials; none of which met the inclusion criteria for the review.

MAIN RESULTS

We included no completed randomised controlled trials. There is currently one ongoing trial, which we may find eligible for a future update.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no randomised controlled trials that evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis, although one trial is currently ongoing. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate the use of corticosteroids in people with ABPA and cystic fibrosis.

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% of people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. High doses of corticosteroids are the main treatment for ABPA; although the long-term benefits are not clear, their many side effects are well-documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, amphotericin B, has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

The review aimed to test the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis:1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo);2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects.If benefit was demonstrated, we aimed to assess the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 29 September 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four trials were identified by the searches; none of which was judged eligible for inclusion in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

No completed randomised controlled trials were included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis, although trials in people who do not have cystic fibrosis have shown clinical and serological evidence of improvement and a reduction in the use of corticosteroids with no increase in adverse effects. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% of people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. High doses of corticosteroids are the main treatment for ABPA; although the long-term benefits are not clear, their many side effects are well-documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, amphotericin B, has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The review aimed to test the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis:1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo);2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects.If benefit was demonstrated, we aimed to assess the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 17 March 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four trials were identified by the searches; none of which was judged eligible for inclusion in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

No completed randomised controlled trials were included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis, although trials in people who do not have cystic fibrosis have shown clinical and serological evidence of improvement and a reduction in the use of corticosteroids with no increase in adverse effects. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Design, characterization, and aerosol dispersion performance modeling of advanced spray-dried microparticulate/nanoparticulate mannitol powders for targeted pulmonary delivery as dry powder inhalers

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to design and characterize inhalable microparticulate/nanoparticulate dry powders of mannitol with essential particle properties for targeted dry powder delivery for cystic fibrosis mucolytic treatment by dilute organic solution spray drying, and, in addition, to tailor and correlate aerosol dispersion performance delivered as dry powder inhalers based on spray-drying conditions and solid-state physicochemical properties.

METHODS

Organic solution advanced spray drying from dilute solution followed by comprehensive solid-state physicochemical characterization and in vitro dry powder aerosolization were used.

RESULTS

The particle size distribution of the spray-dried (SD) powders was narrow, unimodal, and in the range of ∼500 nm to 2.0 μm. The particles possessed spherical particle morphology, relatively smooth surface morphology, low water content and vapor sorption (crystallization occurred at exposure above 65% relative humidity), and retention of crystallinity by polymorphic interconversion. The emitted dose, fine particle fraction (FPF), and respirable fraction (RF) were all relatively high. The mass median aerodynamic diameters were below 4 μm for all SD mannitol aerosols.

CONCLUSION

The in vitro aerosol deposition stage patterns could be tailored based on spray-drying pump rate. Positive linear correlation was observed between both FPF and RF values with spray-drying pump rates. The interplay between various spray-drying conditions, particle physicochemical properties, and aerosol dispersion performance was observed and examined, which enabled tailoring and modeling of high aerosol deposition patterns.

Anti-IgE therapy for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive multisystem disorder with an approximate prevalence of 1 in 3500 live births. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis is a lung disease caused by aspergillus-induced hypersensitivity with a prevalence of 2% to 15% in people with cystic fibrosis. The mainstay of treatment includes corticosteroids and itraconazole. The treatment with corticosteroids for prolonged periods of time, or repeatedly for exacerbations of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, may lead to many adverse effects. The monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, omalizumab, has improved asthma control in severely allergic asthmatics. The drug is given as a subcutaneous injection every two to four weeks. Since allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis is also a condition resulting from hypersensitivity to specific allergens, as in asthma, it may be a candidate for therapy using anti-IgE antibodies. Therefore, anti-IgE therapy, using agents like omalizumab, may be a potential therapy for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of anti-IgE therapy for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. Last search: 21 January 2013.We searched the ongoing trial registry clinicaltrials.gov for any ongoing trials. Latest search for clinicaltrials.gov: 22 February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing anti-IgE therapy to placebo or other therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included study. They planned to perform data analysis using Review Manager 5.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one trial enrolling 14 patients was eligible for inclusion in the review. The study was terminated prematurely and complete data were not available. We contacted the study investigator and were told that the study was terminated due to the inability to recruit patients into the study despite all reasonable attempts. One or more serious side effects were encountered in six out of nine (66.67%) and one out of five (20%) patients in omalizumab group and placebo group respectively.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of anti-IgE (omalizumab) therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. There is a need for large prospective randomized controlled trials of anti-IgE therapy in people with cystic fibrosis and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with both clinical and laboratory outcome measures such as steroid requirement, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis exacerbations and lung function.

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% of people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. High doses of corticosteroids are the main treatment for ABPA; although the long-term benefits are not clear, their many side effects are well-documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, amphotericin B, has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

The review aimed to test the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects.If benefit was demonstrated, we aimed to assess the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: 09 February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two trials were identified by the searches; neither was judged eligible for inclusion in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

No completed randomised controlled trials were included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Management of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: a review and update

Since the first description of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) in the 1950s there have been numerous studies that have shed light on the characteristics and immunopathogenesis of this disease. The increased knowledge and awareness have resulted in earlier diagnosis and treatment of patients with this condition. This article aims to provide a summary and updates on ABPA by reviewing the results of recent studies on this disease with a focus on articles published within the last 5 years. A systematic search of PubMed/Medline with keywords of ABPA or allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis was performed. All selected articles were reviewed with a focus on findings of articles published from December 2006 to December 2011. The relevant findings are summarized in this paper.

Critique of trials in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and fungal allergy

Treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) emerged from uncontrolled published series of patients on prolonged oral glucocorticosteroids. Oral steroids remain the mainstay of treatment, but dose regime and duration have never been standardized. Oral steroids are problematic due to frequency of relapse, lack of steroid action on airway fungal burden and toxicities. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroids (n=1) or oral itraconazole (n=2) in patients with asthma and ABPA have shown efficacy for the latter drug only. Itraconazole is an effective steroid-sparing agent with anti-inflammatory aspects. Use of inhaled budesonide with itraconazole can lead to adrenal suppression due to inhibition of hepatic cytochrome P450. Despite combined use of oral steroids and itraconazole in ABPA, relapses and steroid dependence or toxicity have led to examination of alternative agents in uncontrolled case reports and series. Reports of nebulized amphotericin B in several patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and ABPA suggest a potential benefit. Voriconazole has also been used with some success but also some toxicity. Both itraconazole and voriconazole have also been used in some CF-ABPA patients as monotherapy with mixed results. A recent report described treatment of refractory CF-ABPA with monthly high-dose intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone, also with mixed results. No controlled trials of voriconazole, inhaled amphotericin, or IV pulse steroids have been published. Future studies should focus on controlled trials of antifungal and immunomodulatory agents since conventional steroid therapy remains problematic.

Children in reviews: methodological issues in child-relevant evidence syntheses

BACKGROUND

The delivery of optimal medical care to children is dependent on the availability of child relevant research. Our objectives were to: i) systematically review and describe how children are handled in reviews of drug interventions published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR); and ii) determine when effect sizes for the same drug interventions differ between children and adults.

METHODS

We systematically identified all of the reviews relevant to child health in the CDSR 2002, Issue 4. Reviews were included if they investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of a drug intervention for a condition that occurs in both children and adults. Information was extracted on review characteristics including study methods, results, and conclusions.

RESULTS

From 1496 systematic reviews, 408 (27%) were identified as relevant to both adult and child health; 52% (213) of these included data from children. No significant differences were found in effect sizes between adults and children for any of the drug interventions or conditions investigated. However, all of the comparisons lacked the power to detect a clinically significant difference and wide confidence intervals suggest important differences cannot be excluded. A large amount of data was unavailable due to inadequate reporting at the trial and systematic review level.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the findings of this study indicate there is a paucity of child-relevant and specific evidence generated from evidence syntheses of drug interventions. The results indicate a need for a higher standard of reporting for participant populations in studies of drug interventions.

Update on Cochrane data on paediatric respiratory diseases

INTRODUCTION

Systematic reviews seek to describe and summarise the best evidence for a given intervention by pooling data from relevant quality clinical trials. The Cochrane Collaboration has fostered the development and dissemination of systematic reviews throughout the world. We have identified and summarised The Cochrane systematic reviews of relevance to the paediatric pulmonologist.

METHODS

We performed an expert search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using a combination of medical subject headings and free text terms relating to paediatric respiratory disease.

RESULTS

The search identified 120 systematic reviews with interventions specific to children with some relevance to pulmonary disease, and 327 reviews with interventions relating to pulmonary disease in adults and children. After pragmatic exclusions, 81 reviews were sorted by disease and 59 of these are discussed in detail.

CONCLUSIONS

There are now many systematic reviews that make a positive contribution to paediatric pulmonology. The majority of reviews (69%) found evidence that either confirmed or refuted an accepted practice. The remaining reviews concluded that the evidence for an accepted practice is poor and sometimes wholly absent. Clinicians must be aware that lack of evidence of effect is not the same as evidence of lack of effect. Caution must be exercised before applying the conclusions of systematic reviews based upon adult data to childhood disease.

Aspergillosis. Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and therapy

Diseases caused by Aspergillus species are increasing in importance, especially among immunocompromised hosts. Clinical manifestations are variable, ranging from allergic to invasive disease, largely depending on the status of the host's immune system. This article focuses on the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of diseases caused by Aspergillus species, with more detailed discussion on therapy of the most morbid manifestation, invasive aspergillosis.

Treatment of severe small airways disease in children with cystic fibrosis: alternatives to corticosteroids

A group of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have severe small airways disease characterized by wheeze, chest tightness and limited sputum production, often with deteriorating lung function. Suggested mechanisms include mucosal edema secondary to infection and inflammation, smooth muscle contraction caused by inflammatory mediators, and collapse of bronchiectatic airways. While treatment with long-term oral corticosteroids may result in symptomatic improvement, adverse effects often make them intolerable. Inhaled corticosteroids are used in many centers despite the lack of conclusive evidence of their efficacy. Therapeutic alternatives to corticosteroids are aimed at reversing bronchoconstriction and reducing inflammation. Many patients with CF are treated with short- and long-term inhaled bronchodilators, but data to support their use are inconclusive. Other attempted routes of administration for short-acting bronchodilators include the subcutaneous and intravenous routes, but clinical data are again lacking. Sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium) has been studied, with little evidence of benefit. Theophyllines have also been studied, both intravenously and orally, with some effect, but are not often used in clinical practice. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapies include ibuprofen, macrolide antibiotics, intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine, and leukotriene antagonists. Ibuprofen has been shown to be useful in patients with mild CF disease, but concerns about potential adverse effects have limited its use. The results of various macrolide studies are awaited, but to date there are no long-term studies published. While there is great interest in the potential of intravenous immunoglobulin, cyclosporine and leukotriene antagonists, the evidence for their effectiveness comes from anecdotal reports, thus there is currently insufficient data to support their use. Since this is a small group of patients, it is unlikely that sufficient numbers will ever be recruited for these studies; thus it is probable that drugs will be tried on an individual patient basis. The order in which they are attempted is unclear, but it would be sensible to try the least invasive medication with the least adverse effects first, moving on to more potent, but more toxic drugs if that treatment fails.