1
|
Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D. Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an Overview of Cochrane systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 9:CD012337. [PMID: 36053030 PMCID: PMC9437962 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012337.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI) is the involuntary loss of urine and can be caused by several different conditions. The common types of UI are stress (SUI), urgency (UUI) and mixed (MUI). A wide range of interventions can be delivered to reduce the symptoms of UI in women. Conservative interventions are generally recommended as the first line of treatment. OBJECTIVES To summarise Cochrane Reviews that assessed the effects of conservative interventions for treating UI in women. METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library to January 2021 (CDSR; 2021, Issue 1) and included any Cochrane Review that included studies with women aged 18 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of SUI, UUI or MUI, and investigating a conservative intervention aimed at improving or curing UI. We included reviews that compared a conservative intervention with 'control' (which included placebo, no treatment or usual care), another conservative intervention or another active, but non-conservative, intervention. A stakeholder group informed the selection and synthesis of evidence. Two overview authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data and judged review quality, resolving disagreements through discussion. Primary outcomes of interest were patient-reported cure or improvement and condition-specific quality of life. We judged the risk of bias in included reviews using the ROBIS tool. We judged the certainty of evidence within the reviews based on the GRADE approach. Evidence relating to SUI, UUI or all types of UI combined (AUI) were synthesised separately. The AUI group included evidence relating to participants with MUI, as well as from studies that combined women with different diagnoses (i.e. SUI, UUI and MUI) and studies in which the type of UI was unclear. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 relevant Cochrane Reviews. Seven focused on physical therapies; five on education, behavioural and lifestyle advice; one on mechanical devices; one on acupuncture and one on yoga. Fourteen focused on non-conservative interventions but had a comparison with a conservative intervention. No reviews synthesised evidence relating to psychological therapies. There were 112 unique trials (including 8975 women) that had primary outcome data included in at least one analysis. Stress urinary incontinence (14 reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate or high certainty evidence that pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), PFMT plus biofeedback and cones were more beneficial than control for curing or improving UI. PFMT and intravaginal devices improved quality of life compared to control. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: for cure and improvement of UI, there was moderate or high certainty evidence that: continence pessary plus PFMT was more beneficial than continence pessary alone; PFMT plus educational intervention was more beneficial than cones; more-intensive PFMT was more beneficial than less-intensive PFMT; and PFMT plus an adherence strategy was more beneficial than PFMT alone. There was no moderate or high certainty evidence for quality of life. Urgency urinary incontinence (five reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate to high-certainty evidence demonstrating that PFMT plus feedback, PFMT plus biofeedback, electrical stimulation and bladder training were more beneficial than control for curing or improving UI. Women using electrical stimulation plus PFMT had higher quality of life than women in the control group. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: for cure or improvement, there was moderate certainty evidence that electrical stimulation was more effective than laseropuncture. There was high or moderate certainty evidence that PFMT resulted in higher quality of life than electrical stimulation and electrical stimulation plus PFMT resulted in better cure or improvement and higher quality of life than PFMT alone. All types of urinary incontinence (13 reviews) Conservative intervention versus control: there was moderate to high certainty evidence of better cure or improvement with PFMT, electrical stimulation, weight loss and cones compared to control. There was moderate certainty evidence of improved quality of life with PFMT compared to control. One conservative intervention versus another conservative intervention: there was moderate or high certainty evidence of better cure or improvement for PFMT with bladder training than bladder training alone. Likewise, PFMT with more individual health professional supervision was more effective than less contact/supervision and more-intensive PFMT was more beneficial than less-intensive PFMT. There was moderate certainty evidence that PFMT plus bladder training resulted in higher quality of life than bladder training alone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high certainty that PFMT is more beneficial than control for all types of UI for outcomes of cure or improvement and quality of life. We are moderately certain that, if PFMT is more intense, more frequent, with individual supervision, with/without combined with behavioural interventions with/without an adherence strategy, effectiveness is improved. We are highly certain that, for cure or improvement, cones are more beneficial than control (but not PFMT) for women with SUI, electrical stimulation is beneficial for women with UUI, and weight loss results in more cure and improvement than control for women with AUI. Most evidence within the included Cochrane Reviews is of low certainty. It is important that future new and updated Cochrane Reviews develop questions that are more clinically useful, avoid multiple overlapping reviews and consult women with UI to further identify outcomes of importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Todhunter-Brown
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christine Hazelton
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Pauline Campbell
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Doreen McClurg
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assessing the mortality risk in older patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis: the role of frailty and acute organ dysfunction. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022; 34:2335-2343. [PMID: 35799097 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02182-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A prognostic stratification of mortality risk in older patients with sepsis admitted to medical wards is often challenging. AIMS To evaluate the ability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, serum biomarkers (lactate and C-Reactive Protein, CRP), and measures of comorbidity and frailty in predicting in-hospital and 6-month mortality in a cohort of older patients admitted to an Acute Geriatric Unit (AGU) with a diagnosis of sepsis. METHODS All patients aged 70 years and over consecutively admitted to our AGU with sepsis in the study period were included. At admission, a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment including two measures of frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], Frailty Index [FI]) was obtained. To assess the predictivity of candidate prognostic markers, the Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curves were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed. RESULTS We included 240 patients (median age = 85, IQR = 80-89, 40.8% women), of whom 33.8% died before discharge, and 60.4% at 6 months. The SOFA score (AUROC = 0.678, 95% CI 0.610-0.747) and CRP serum levels (AUROC = 0.606, 95% CI 0.532-0.680) were good predictors of in-hospital mortality. The CFS (AUROC = 0.703, 95% CI 0.637-0.768) and the FI (AUROC = 0.677, 95% CI 0.607-0.746) better predicted 6-month mortality. Results of the regression analysis confirmed the findings of the AUROC study. The combined assessment of SOFA and measures of frailty improved the performance of the model both in the short and the long term. CONCLUSIONS Both the severity of organ dysfunction and frailty scores should be addressed on AGU admission to establish the short- and long-term outcomes of older patients with sepsis.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dadwal G, Schulte-Huxel T, Kolb G. Geriatric traumatology (e. g. "Alterstraumatologie") is more than orthogeriatrics-Experiences of a physician in advanced training. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2021; 55:513-518. [PMID: 34269864 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-021-01935-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This article reporting the view of an early career physician focuses on the diverse components of orthogeriatric co-management in a clinical setting. Geriatric trauma patients require a multimodal and interdisciplinary management, which includes individual and age-specific aspects, such as intensified physiotherapy, trauma surgery and geriatric expertise as well as social support. In Germany this surgical and geriatric co-treatment is provided by the program geriatric traumatology (Alterstraumatologie), which is implemented and certified at special institutions called geriatric trauma centers (Alters-Trauma-Zentrum). This special care is accomplished by an orthogeriatric co-management, which combines the efforts of both modern state of the art trauma surgery and geriatric medicine, preferable by using the procedure of the so-called geriatric early rehabilitative complex treatment (geriatrische frührehabilitative Komplexbehandlung) according to the diagnosis-related group (DRG) procedure OPS 8550. This is administered in 3 periods: the preoperative period, perioperative period and postoperative period and if indicated followed and completed by a geriatric rehabilitation. According to recent studies this approach has proved to be beneficial especially with respect to a reduction of posttraumatic morbidity rates and avoiding loss of function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Dadwal
- Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Medizinische Klinik, Fachbereich Unfallchirurgie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelmstraße 13, 49808, Lingen, Germany.
| | - T Schulte-Huxel
- Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Medizinische Klinik, Fachbereich Unfallchirurgie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelmstraße 13, 49808, Lingen, Germany
| | - G Kolb
- Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, Medizinische Klinik, Fachbereich Geriatrie, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelmstraße 13, 49808, Lingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Renom-Guiteras A. Potentially inappropriate medication among people with dementia: towards individualized decision-making. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12:569-575. [PMID: 34003481 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00502-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aims of this manuscript are to report on several aspects that may deserve special consideration when individualizing decisions on the prescription appropriateness among people with dementia, and to discuss current research needs in relation to these aspects. METHODS Review article based on selective literature. RESULTS The aspects that may deserve special consideration are: the prescription of pychotropic medications, for being commonly inappropriately prescribed; the presence of advanced stage of dementia, comorbidities or multi-morbidity and/or frailty, as they can determine the prognosis and goals of care; the values and wishes of the person with dementia, as they may prioritize different goals of care; and medication adherence, as it may be poorer compared with persons without dementia. Further research on these aspects including representative participants is necessary as evidence base to guide clinical practice. CONCLUSION Individualised decisions on prescription appropriateness among people with dementia may require a comprehensive evaluation of the person in order to establish a shared care plan. Further research will probably support this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Renom-Guiteras
- Department of Geriatric Medicine. Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain. .,Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hansen TK, Shahla S, Damsgaard EM, Bossen SRL, Bruun JM, Gregersen M. Mortality and readmission risk can be predicted by the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index: a cohort study of medical inpatients older than 75 years. Eur Geriatr Med 2021; 12:253-261. [PMID: 33570735 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-021-00453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the predictive value of the record-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) on mortality, readmission and length of hospital stay (LOS) among older medical inpatients. METHODS A cohort of medical inpatients aged ≥ 75 years was rated using the record-based MPI to assess frailty retrospectively. 90-day and 1-year mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated in a sex- and age-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. 30-day readmission relative risk (RR) estimates were calculated in a binary regression model with mortality as a competing risk. Discrimination was expressed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Median LOS was calculated using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS In total, 1190 patients with a median age of 83 years were included. 50% were male. 335 patients (28%) were categorized as non-frail (MPI score 0.0-0.33), 522 (44%) moderately frail (MPI score 0.34-0.66) and 333 (28%) severely frail (MPI score 0.67-1.0). 90-day mortality HR was 7.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-18.6, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 18.5 (95% CI 7.5-46.1, p < 0.001) for the severely frail compared with the non-frail. ROC area was 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.80). Similarly, 1-year mortality HR was 3.3 (95% CI 2.2-5.0, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 7.1 (95% CI 4.7-10.6, p < 0.001) for the severely frail. 30-day readmission RR was 2.1 (95% CI 1.5-2.9, p < 0.001) for the moderately frail and 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001) for the severely frail. LOS was significantly longer with increasing MPI score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The record-based MPI assessed at discharge predicts dose-dependent post-discharge mortality and readmission risk and is associated with LOS in older medical inpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troels Kjærskov Hansen
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
- Medical Department, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
| | - Seham Shahla
- Medical Department, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Else Marie Damsgaard
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Jens Meldgaard Bruun
- Medical Department, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Merete Gregersen
- Department of Geriatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rakowska-Silska M, Jobs K, Paturej A, Kalicki B. Voiding Disorders in Pediatrician's Practice. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-PEDIATRICS 2020; 14:1179556520975035. [PMID: 33293883 PMCID: PMC7705800 DOI: 10.1177/1179556520975035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Voiding disorders result usually from functional disturbance. However, relevant
organic diseases must be excluded prior to diagnosis of functional disorders.
Additional tests, such as urinalysis or abdominal ultrasound are required.
Further diagnostics is necessary in the presence of alarm symptoms, such as
secondary nocturnal enuresis, weak or intermittent urine flow, systemic
symptoms, glucosuria, proteinuria, leukocyturia, erythrocyturia, skin lesions in
the lumbar region, altered sensations in the perineum. Functional micturition
disorders were thoroughly described in 2006, and revised in 2015 by ICCS
(International Children’s Continence Society) and are divided into storage
symptoms (increased and decreased voiding frequency, incontinence, urgency,
nocturia), voiding symptoms hesitancy, straining, weak stream, intermittency,
dysuria), and symptoms that cannot be assigned to any of the above groups
(voiding postponement, holding maneuvers, feeling of incomplete emptying,
urinary retention, post micturition dribble, spraying of the urinary stream).
Functional voiding disorders are frequently associated with constipation.
Bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) is diagnosed when lower urinary tract
symptoms are accompanied by problems with defecation. Monosymptomatic enuresis
is the most common voiding disorder encountered by pediatricians. It is
diagnosed in children older than 5 years without any other lower urinary tract
symptoms. Other types of voiding disorders such as: non-monosymptomatic
enuresis, overactive and underactive bladder, voiding postponement, bladder
outlet obstruction, stress or giggle incontinence, urethrovaginal reflux usually
require specialized diagnostics and therapy. Treatment of all types of
functional voiding disorders is based on non-pharmacological recommendations
(urotherapy), and such education should be implemented by primary care
pediatricians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magda Rakowska-Silska
- Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Nephrology and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Jobs
- Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Nephrology and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Paturej
- Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Nephrology and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Bolesław Kalicki
- Department of Paediatrics, Paediatric Nephrology and Allergology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Russo E, Caretto M, Giannini A, Bitzer J, Cano A, Ceausu I, Chedraui P, Durmusoglu F, Erkkola R, Goulis DG, Kiesel L, Lambrinoudaki I, Hirschberg AL, Lopes P, Pines A, Rees M, van Trotsenburg M, Simoncini T. Management of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women: An EMAS clinical guide. Maturitas 2020; 143:223-230. [PMID: 33008675 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of urinary incontinence and of other lower urinary tract symptoms increases after the menopause and affects between 38 % and 55 % of women aged over 60 years. While urinary incontinence has a profound impact on quality of life, few affected women seek care. AIM The aim of this clinical guide is to provide an evidence-based approach to the management of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature review and consensus of expert opinion. SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS Healthcare professionals should consider urinary incontinence a clinical priority and develop appropriate diagnostic skills. They should be able to identify and manage any relevant modifiable factors that could alleviate the condition. A wide range of treatment options is available. First-line management includes lifestyle and behavioral modification, pelvic floor exercises and bladder training. Estrogens and other pharmacological interventions are helpful in the treatment of urgency incontinence that does not respond to conservative measures. Third-line therapies (e.g. sacral neuromodulation, intravesical onabotulinum toxin-A injections and posterior tibial nerve stimulation) are useful in selected patients with refractory urge incontinence. Surgery should be considered in postmenopausal women with stress incontinence. Midurethral slings, including retropubic and transobturator approaches, are safe and effective and should be offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Russo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marta Caretto
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56100, Pisa, Italy
| | - Johannes Bitzer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Cano
- Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Valencia and INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | - Iuliana Ceausu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology I, "Dr. I. Cantacuzino" Hospital, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Peter Chedraui
- Instituto de Investigación e Innovación de Salud Integral (ISAIN), Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Fatih Durmusoglu
- İstanbul Medipol International School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Risto Erkkola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Dimitrios G Goulis
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Irene Lambrinoudaki
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Angelica Lindén Hirschberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Patrice Lopes
- Nantes, France Polyclinique de l'Atlantique Saint Herblain. F 44819 St Herblain France, Université de Nantes F, 44093, Nantes, Cedex, France
| | - Amos Pines
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Margaret Rees
- Women's Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Mick van Trotsenburg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital St. Poelten, Lilienfeld, Austria
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56100, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim A, Kim S, Kim HG. Current Overview of Surgical Options for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Int Neurourol J 2020; 24:222-230. [PMID: 33017893 PMCID: PMC7538288 DOI: 10.5213/inj.2040052.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a highly prevalent health condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Traditional methods of treatment for SUI, such as pubovaginal sling and Burch colposuspension, have been replaced by the midurethral sling because of its high efficacy, low complication and morbidity rates, and short learning curve. Although multiple behavioral and operative treatments exist, midurethral slings are the gold standard for the treatment of SUI in women. However, several reports have raised concerns about complications caused by the synthetic mesh used in midurethral slings. Therefore, surgical treatment for SUI in women must be chosen with care, taking into account potential complications. Herein, we review the current safety issues pertaining to the use of meshes, the efficacy of traditional surgeries, old and new midurethral slings, and recent data comparing the efficacy and safety of different surgical options. This review is aimed at developing practical guidelines for choosing surgical options for women with SUI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aram Kim
- Department of Urology, KonKuk University Medical Center, KonKuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sehwan Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Beckman Laser Institute Korea, School of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheoan, Korea
| | - Hyeong Gon Kim
- Department of Urology, KonKuk University Medical Center, KonKuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bideau M, Allègre L, Callewaert G, Fatton B, de Tayrac R. Stress urinary incontinence after transvaginal mesh surgery for anterior and apical prolapse: preoperative risk factors. Int Urogynecol J 2020; 32:111-117. [PMID: 32533213 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04363-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Debate persists over whether surgery to correct pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should be combined with midurethral sling (MUS) insertion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) up to 12 months after transvaginal mesh surgery, with or without MUS, and to identify risk factors for postoperative SUI. METHODS This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent transvaginal mesh surgery with Uphold™ between October 2010 and December 2017. The primary outcome was the prevalence of SUI at 12 months postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risks factors for postoperative SUI. RESULTS Of the 308 women included, 123 (40%) were continent (no SUI), 108 (35%) had SUI, and 76 (25%) had occult SUI. Forty-nine patients (15.9%) had a concomitant MUS procedure. At 12 months after surgery, 35.9% of patients without concomitant MUS had SUI vs 14.3% with (p = 0.003). Thirty-five patients (29%) developed de novo SUI. Postoperative complications were more common in patients with concomitant MUS (30.6% vs 17%; p = 0.003). The best predictor of postoperative SUI was the presence of preoperative SUI (OR 2.52 (1.25-5.09). Concomitant MUS (p < 0.001), and prior POP surgery (p = 0.034) were protective factors for postoperative SUI. CONCLUSION Preoperative SUI is the most important risk factor for postoperative SUI. However, given the higher risk of postoperative complications with concomitant MUS and the acceptable rate of de novo SUI rate without it, two-stage surgery seems preferable for patients with preoperative SUI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathilde Bideau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.
| | - Lucie Allègre
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France
| | - Geertje Callewaert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Fatton
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France
| | - Renaud de Tayrac
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Nîmes, University of Montpellier, Place du Pr Debré, 30029, Nîmes Cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saraswat L, Rehman H, Omar MI, Cody JD, Aluko P, Glazener CMA. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:CD001754. [PMID: 31990055 PMCID: PMC7027385 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001754.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stress urinary incontinence constitutes a significant health and economic burden to society. Traditional suburethral slings are surgical operations used to treat women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of traditional suburethral sling procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence in women; and summarise the principal findings of relevant economic evaluations. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), as well as MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP); we handsearched journals and conference proceedings (searched 27 February 2017) and the reference lists of relevant articles. On 23 January 2019, we updated this search; as a result, several additional reports of studies are awaiting classification. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised or quasi-randomised trials that assessed traditional suburethral slings for treating stress or mixed urinary incontinence. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently extracted data from included trials and assessed risk of bias. When appropriate, a summary statistic was calculated: risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, odds ratio (OR) for continence and cure rates that were expected to be high, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. We adopted the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence. MAIN RESULTS A total of 34 trials involving 3244 women were included. Traditional slings were compared with 10 other treatments and with each other. We did not identify any trials comparing suburethral slings with no treatment or sham treatment, conservative management, anterior repair, or laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension. Most trials did not distinguish between women having surgery for primary or recurrent incontinence. One trial compared traditional slings with bladder neck needle suspension, and another trial compared traditional slings with single-incision slings. Both trials were too small to be informative. Traditional suburethral sling operation versus drugs One small trial compared traditional suburethral sling operations with oxybutynin to treat women with mixed urinary incontinence. This trial did not report any of our GRADE-specific outcomes. It is uncertain whether surgery compared with oxybutynin leads to more women being dry (83% vs 0%; OR 195.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.91 to 3871.03) or having less urgency urinary incontinence (13% vs 43%; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.94) because the quality of this evidence is very low. Traditional suburethral sling versus injectables One small trial compared traditional slings with suburethral injectable treatment. The impact of surgery versus injectables is uncertain in terms of the number of continent women (100% were dry with a traditional sling versus 71% with the injectable after the first year; OR 11.57, 95% CI 0.56 to 239.74), the need for repeat surgery for urinary incontinence (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.36) or the occurrence of perioperative complications (RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 8.49), as the quality of evidence is very low. Traditional suburethral sling versus open abdominal retropubic colposuspension Eight trials compared slings with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension. Moderate-quality evidence shows that the traditional suburethral sling probably leads to more continent women in the medium term (one to five years) (69% vs 59% after colposuspension: OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.37). High-quality evidence shows that women were less likely to need repeat continence surgery after a traditional sling operation than after colposuspension (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.42). We found no evidence of a difference in perioperative complications between the two groups, but the CI was very wide and the quality of evidence was very low (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.86). Traditional suburethral sling operation versus mid-urethral slings Fourteen trials compared traditional sling operations and mid-urethral sling operations. Depending on judgements about what constitutes a clinically important difference between interventions with regard to continence, traditional suburethral slings are probably no better, and may be less effective, than mid-urethral slings in terms of number of women continent in the medium term (one to five years) (67% vs 74%; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.02; n = 458; moderate-quality evidence). One trial reported more continent women with the traditional sling after 10 years (51% vs 32%: OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.61). Mid-urethral slings may be associated with fewer perioperative complications (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.60; low-quality evidence). One type of traditional sling operation versus another type of traditional sling operation Nine trials compared one type of traditional sling operation with another. The different types of traditional slings, along with the number of different materials used, mean that trial results could not be pooled due to clinical heterogeneity. Complications were reported by two trials - one comparing non-absorbable Goretex with a rectus fascia sling, and the second comparing Pelvicol with a rectus fascial sling. The impact was uncertain due to the very low quality of evidence. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low-quality evidence suggests that women may be more likely to be continent in the medium term (one to five years) after a traditional suburethral sling operation than after colposuspension. It is very uncertain whether there is a difference in urinary incontinence after a traditional suburethral sling compared with a mid-urethral sling in the medium term. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, as long-term follow-up data were not available from most trials. Long-term follow-up of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing traditional slings with colposuspension and mid-urethral slings is essential. Evidence is insufficient to suggest whether traditional suburethral slings may be better or worse than other management techniques. This review is confined to RCTs and therefore may not identify all of the adverse effects that may be associated with these procedures. A brief economic commentary (BEC) identified three eligible economic evaluations, which are not directly comparable due to differences in methods, time horizons, and settings. End users of this review will need to assess the extent to which methods and results of identified economic evaluations may be applicable (or transferable) to their own setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucky Saraswat
- Aberdeen Royal InfirmaryObstetrics and GynaecologyForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Haroon Rehman
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS GrampianDepartment of OrthopaedicsForesterhillAberdeenScotlandUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- European Association of UrologyArnhemNetherlands
- University of AberdeenAcademic Urology UnitHealth Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - June D Cody
- Newcastle Universityc/o Cochrane Incontinence, Population Health Sciences InstituteBaddiley‐Clark Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneTyne and WearUKNE2 4AX
| | - Patricia Aluko
- Newcastle Universityc/o Cochrane Incontinence, Population Health Sciences InstituteBaddiley‐Clark Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneTyne and WearUKNE2 4AX
| | - Cathryn MA Glazener
- University of AberdeenHealth Services Research Unit3rd Floor, Health Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenScotlandUKAB25 2ZD
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Survey on surgery for stress urinary incontinence in an era mid-urethral slings are being questioned. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 31:695-702. [PMID: 31848660 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Concerns about vaginal mesh have reduced the use of mid-urethral slings (MUS) in some countries. In view of their potential withdrawal in Belgium and The Netherlands, we polled urogynaecologists on their practice for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and what their experience is with alternative procedures, and we asked them how their patients perceive the risk and success rates. METHODS A survey among members of the pelvic floor special interest group of the Flemish Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Belgian Association of Urology and Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. RESULTS Their primary procedure of choice is the MUS (99%). Sixty-five per cent performs at least 25 MUS yearly; they report high success (90%; IQR [85-92]) and low adverse outcome rates. Physicians anticipate complications as reported in the literature: 5% (IQR [410]) overactive bladder, 5% (IQR [2-10]) voiding problems, 2% (IQR [15]) exposures, 2% (IQR [1-5]) dyspareunia and 1% (IQR [1-3]) chronic pain. Eighty-five per cent of physicians report their patients express fears about having a MUS though usually they cannot precisely tell why. Reportedly they tell their physicians of concerns about pain (54%), exposure (45%), dyspareunia (25%), voiding problems (15%) or overactive bladder (8%). Only half of respondents had ever performed a colposuspension. The majority of these were older and performed colposuspension via laparotomy. Only six (4%) had performed > 20 colposuspensions yearly. CONCLUSION Dutch and Belgian urogynaecologists estimate success and adverse effect rates of MUS in line with the literature. Their patients most cited worries were fear of chronic pain and exposure. Only half of respondents had ever performed a colposuspension. They were older and performed the procedure via laparotomy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Freites J, Stewart F, Omar MI, Mashayekhi A, Agur WI. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD002239. [PMID: 31821550 PMCID: PMC6903454 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002239.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic colposuspension was one of the first minimal access operations for treating stress urinary incontinence in women, with the presumed advantages of shorter hospital stays and quicker return to normal activities. This Cochrane Review was last updated in 2010. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women; and summarise the principal findings of relevant economic evaluations of these interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register (22 May 2019), which contains trials identified from CENTRAL, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of women with urinary incontinence that included laparoscopic surgery in at least one arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We independently extracted data from eligible trials, assessed risk of bias and implemented GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 26 trials involving 2271 women. Thirteen trials (1304 women) compared laparoscopic colposuspension to open colposuspension and nine trials (412 women) to midurethral sling procedures. One trial (161 women) compared laparoscopic colposuspension with one suture to laparoscopic colposuspension with two sutures; and three trials (261 women) compared laparoscopic colposuspension with sutures to laparoscopic colposuspension with mesh and staples. The majority of trials did not follow up participants beyond 18 months. Overall, there was unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias and generally low risk of attrition and reporting bias. There is little difference between laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and open colposuspension for subjective cure within 18 months (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.08; 6 trials, 755 women; high-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples is better or worse than open colposuspension for subjective cure within 18 months (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; 3 trials, 362 women; very low-quality evidence) or whether there is a greater risk of repeat continence surgery with laparoscopic colposuspension. Laparoscopic colposuspension may have a lower risk of perioperative complications (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.94; 11 trials, 1369 women; low-quality evidence). There may be similar or higher rates of bladder perforations with laparoscopic colposuspension (RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.29; 10 trials, 1311 women; moderate-quality evidence). Rates for de novo detrusor overactivity (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.30; 5 trials, 472 women) and voiding dysfunction (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.31; 5 trials, 507 women) may be similar but we are uncertain due to the wide confidence interval. Five studies reported on quality of life but we could not synthesise the data. There may be little difference between laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for subjective cure within 18 months (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.16; 4 trials, 256 women; low-quality evidence) or between laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples and TVT (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.91; 1 trial, 121 women; low-quality evidence). For laparoscopic colposuspension compared with midurethral slings, there may be lower rates of repeat continence surgery (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.62; 1 trial, 70 women; low-quality evidence) and similar risk of perioperative complications (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.64; 7 trials, 514 women; low-quality evidence) but we are uncertain due to the wide confidence intervals. There may be little difference in terms of de novo detrusor overactivity (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.88; 4 trials, 326 women; low-quality evidence); and probably little difference in terms of voiding dysfunction (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.41; 5 trials, 412 women; moderate-quality evidence) although we are uncertain due to the wide confidence interval. Five studies reported on quality of life but we could not synthesise the data. No studies reported on bladder perforations. Low-quality evidence indicates that there may be higher subjective cure rates within 18 months with two sutures compared to one suture (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.64; 1 trial, 158 women). Comparing one suture and two sutures, one suture may have lower rates of repeat continence surgery (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.37; 1 trial, 157 women) and similar risk of perioperative complications (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.70) but we are uncertain due to the wide 95% CIs. There may be higher rates of voiding dysfunction with one suture compared to two sutures (RR 2.82; 95% CI 0.30 to 26.54; 1 trial, 158 women; low-quality evidence), but we are uncertain due to the wide confidence interval. This trial did not report bladder perforations, de novo detrusor overactivity or quality of life. We are uncertain whether laparoscopic colposuspension with sutures is better or worse for subjective cure within 18 months compared to mesh and staples (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.59; 2 trials, 180 women; very low-quality evidence) or in terms of repeat continence surgery (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.06 to 14.91; 1 trial, 69 women; very low-quality evidence). Laparoscopic colposuspension with sutures may increase the number of perioperative complications compared to mesh and staples (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.48; 3 trials, 260 women; low-quality evidence) but rates of de novo detrusor overactivity may be similar (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.17 to 3.06; 2 trials, 122 women; low-quality evidence), however, we are uncertain due to the wide confidence interval. None of the studies reported bladder perforations, voiding dysfunction or quality of life. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The data indicate that, in terms of subjective cure of incontinence within 18 months, there is probably little difference between laparoscopic colposuspension and open colposuspension, or between laparoscopic colposuspension and midurethral sling procedures. Much of the evidence is low quality, meaning that a considerable degree of uncertainty remains about laparoscopic colposuspension. Future trials should recruit adequate numbers, conduct long-term follow-up and measure clinically important outcomes. A brief economic commentary identified three studies. We have not quality-assessed them and they should be interpreted in light of the findings on clinical effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jawad Freites
- York Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of Obstetrics & GynaecologyScarboroughUK
| | - Fiona Stewart
- Newcastle Universityc/o Cochrane Incontinence, Population Health Sciences InstituteBaddiley‐Clark BuildingRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Muhammad Imran Omar
- European Association of UrologyArnhemNetherlands
- University of AberdeenAcademic Urology UnitHealth Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenUKAB25 2ZD
| | - Atefeh Mashayekhi
- Newcastle Universityc/o Cochrane Incontinence, Population Health Sciences InstituteBaddiley‐Clark BuildingRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Wael I Agur
- University of GlasgowSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and NursingGlasgowUKG12 8QQ
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ong HL, Sokolova I, Bekarma H, Curtis C, Macdonald A, Agur W. Development, validation and initial evaluation of patient-decision aid (SUI-PDA©) for women considering stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30:2013-2022. [PMID: 31377841 PMCID: PMC6861540 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04047-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Following the design, face validation and publication of a novel PDA for women considering SUI surgery, the main objective of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of SUI-PDA© by using a validated tool to obtain patient feedback. METHODS From July 2018 to March 2019, the PDA, already incorporated into the patient care pathway, was objectively evaluated using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) to determine patients' views. Patients recorded their values and reasons for requests and declines of treatment. The total DCS score, scores from each DCS subgroup and individual patient responses were calculated and analysed. RESULTS The mean age of the first 20 patients to complete the DCS was 54 years, the mean BMI was 30.1 and the median parity was 3. The average total DCS score was only 9.29 out of 100 (range 0-29.69) suggesting that the PDA was quite useful for patients considering SUI surgery. Overall, the PDA had largely favourable responses across all five DCS subgroups. The 'informed' subgroup had the best score (6.67) while the 'uncertainty' subgroup had the least favourable score (14.58). Despite the procedure pause, the mesh tape option remained on the PDA; however, no patient had chosen this option, with a large proportion citing 'safety' issues as the main reason. Bulking agent injections were the most popular choice (40.0%) and the most commonly performed procedures (50.0%) mainly because of quicker 'recovery'. The second most popular participant choice was colposuspension (35.0%) followed by autologous fascial sling (25.0%), with women citing 'efficacy' as the main reason behind their choice. CONCLUSION SUI-PDA© was reported by patients and clinicians to be useful with clinical decision-making for SUI surgery. Further validation in a larger patient group is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inna Sokolova
- University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Kilmarnock, UK
| | - Holly Bekarma
- University Hospital Ayr, NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Ayr, UK
| | - Claire Curtis
- Person-Centred Health and Care Programme, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Wael Agur
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
- University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Kilmarnock, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bakali E, Johnson E, Buckley BS, Hilton P, Walker B, Tincello DG. Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral tape surgery in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9:CD009407. [PMID: 31482580 PMCID: PMC6722049 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009407.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is a common treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), usually offered to women for whom conservative treatments have failed. Midurethral tapes have superseded colposuspension because cure rates are comparable and recovery time is reduced. However, some women will not be cured after midurethral tape surgery. Currently, there is no consensus on how to manage the condition in these women.This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2013. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral tape surgery in women; and to summarise the principal findings of economic evaluations of these interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 9 November 2018). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in women who had recurrent stress urinary incontinence after previous minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery. We included conservative, pharmacological and surgical treatments. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors checked the abstracts of identified studies to confirm their eligibility. We obtained full-text reports of relevant studies and contacted study authors directly for additional information where necessary. We extracted outcome data onto a standard proforma and processed them according to the guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. MAIN RESULTS We included one study in this review. This study was later reported in an originally unplanned secondary analysis of 46 women who underwent transobturator tape for recurrent SUI after one or more previous failed operations. We were unable to use the data, as they were not presented according to the nature of the first operation.We excluded 12 studies, five because they were not randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four because previous incontinence surgery was not performed using midurethral tape. We considered a further three to be ineligible because neither the trial report nor personal communication with the trialists could confirm whether any of the participants had previously undergone surgery with tape.We had also planned to develop a brief economic commentary summarising the principal findings of relevant economic evaluations but supplementary systematic searches did not identify any such studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There were insufficient data to assess the effects of any of the different management strategies for recurrent or persistent stress incontinence after failed midurethral tape surgery. No published papers have reported exclusively on women whose first operation was a midurethral tape. Evidence from further RCTs and economic evaluations is required to address uncertainties about the effects and costs of these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Bakali
- University Hospitals of BirminghamDepartment of Obstetrics and GynaecologyBirminghamUK
| | - Eugenie Johnson
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyBaddiley‐Clark Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Brian S Buckley
- University of the PhilippinesDepartment of SurgeryManilaPhilippines
| | - Paul Hilton
- Newcastle UniversityFaculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Ben Walker
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyBaddiley‐Clark Building, Richardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Douglas G Tincello
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Life SciencesUniversity RoadLeicesterLeicestershireUKLE1 7RH
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wu YM, Welk B. Revisiting current treatment options for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a contemporary literature review. Res Rep Urol 2019; 11:179-188. [PMID: 31355157 PMCID: PMC6590839 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s191555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affect many women in their lifetime. In this review, we describe and evaluate the latest treatment options for SUI and POP, including the controversy around transvaginal mesh (TVM) use. Growing evidence supports the utilization of pelvic floor muscle training as first-line treatment for both SUI and POP. Vaginal pessaries continue to be an effective and reversible option to manage SUI and POP symptoms. The midurethral sling remains the gold standard for surgical treatment of SUI, although patients and clinicians should acknowledge the potentially serious complications of TVM. Burch urethropexy and pubovaginal sling offer good SUI cure and may be preferred in women wishing to avoid mesh implants; however, their operative morbidities and more challenging surgical approach may limit their use. Site-specific cystocele or rectocele repairs may be indicated for isolated anterior or posterior vaginal compartment prolapse; however, in women with more severe POP, evidence supports using a vaginal native-tissue repair involving apical suspension as the primary surgical technique. Although abdominal and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies are both effective in treating POP, their failure and mesh complication rates increase with time. There is insufficient evidence to support the widespread use of uterine-preserving surgical POP repairs at present due to the lack of long-term data. Routine TVM use is not recommended in POP surgeries and should only be considered on a case-by-case basis by trained surgeons, primarily in women with multiple risk factors for POP recurrence. In general, clinicians should individualize SUI and POP treatment options for women based on their symptoms, comorbidities, and risk factors for mesh-related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Maria Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blayne Welk
- Department of Surgery and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dahlqvist J, Ekdahl A, Friedrichsen M. Does comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in an outpatient care setting affect the causes of death and the quality of palliative care? A subanalysis of the age-FIT study. Eur Geriatr Med 2019; 10:455-462. [PMID: 34652806 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-019-00198-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purposes of this study were to retrospectively study whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) given to community-dwelling old patients with high health care usage has effects regarding: (1) the cause of death and (2) the quality of the provided palliative care when compared to patients without CGA-based care. METHOD This study includes secondary data from a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 382 participants that took place in the periods 2011-2013. The present study examines all electronical medical records (EMR) from the deceased patients in the original study regarding cause of death [intervention group (IG) N = 51/control group (CG) N = 66] and quality of palliative care (IG N = 33/CG N = 41). Descriptive and comparative statistics were produced and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS The causes of death in both groups were dominated by cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases with no statistical difference between the groups. Patients in the intervention group had a higher degree of support from specialised palliative care teams than had the control group (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION The present study in an outpatient context cannot prove any effects of CGA on causes of death. The study shows that CGA in outpatient care means a higher rate of specialised palliative care, but the study cannot show any effects on the palliative quality parameters measured. Further studies with statistical power are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Dahlqvist
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Vrinnevi Hospital, Gamla Övägen 25, 601 82, Norrköping, Sweden.
| | - Anne Ekdahl
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Charlotte Yhlens gata 10, 251 87, Helsingborg, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institute (KI), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Friedrichsen
- Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
- Palliative Education and Research Center, Vrinnevi Hospital, Gamla Övägen 25, 601 82, Norrköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Ford A, Dubuisson JB, Mourad S, Digesu A. Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38:553-562. [PMID: 30620096 PMCID: PMC6850136 DOI: 10.1002/nau.23905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Aims To evaluate the historic and pathophysiologic issues which led to the development of Burch colposuspension, to describe anatomic and technical aspects of the operation and to provide an update on current evidence. Methods We have performed a focused literature review and have searched the current available literature about historic dimension, technical descriptions, and efficacy of Burch colposuspension. Results Burch colposuspension, performed either by an open or a laparoscopic approach, is an effective surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Conclusions In current recommendations, Burch colposuspension remains an option for secondary treatment. Because midurethral slings have recently become under scrutiny, it may return as a first‐line treatment procedure. Both open and laparoscopic Burch colposuspension should therefore nowadays be provided in fellowship programs worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaus Veit-Rubin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Dubuisson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Abigail Ford
- Department of Urogynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, Unted Kingdom
| | | | | | - Alex Digesu
- Department of Urogynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, Unted Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stewart F, Berghmans B, Bø K, Glazener CMA. Electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 12:CD012390. [PMID: 29271482 PMCID: PMC6486295 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012390.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several treatment options are available for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), drug therapy and surgery. Problems exist such as adherence to PFMT regimens, side effects linked to drug therapy and the risks associated with surgery. We have evaluated an alternative treatment, electrical stimulation (ES) with non-implanted devices, which aims to improve pelvic floor muscle function to reduce involuntary urine loss. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of electrical stimulation with non-implanted devices, alone or in combination with other treatment, for managing stress urinary incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence in women. Among the outcomes examined were costs and cost-effectiveness. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearches of journals and conference proceedings (searched 27 February 2017). We also searched the reference lists of relevant articles and undertook separate searches to identify studies examining economic data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of ES with non-implanted devices compared with any other treatment for SUI in women. Eligible trials included adult women with SUI or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). We excluded studies of women with urgency-predominant MUI, urgency urinary incontinence only, or incontinence associated with a neurologic condition. We would have included economic evaluations had they been conducted alongside eligible trials. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data from eligible trials and assessed risk of bias, using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We would have performed economic evaluations using the approach recommended by Cochrane Economic Methods. MAIN RESULTS We identified 56 eligible trials (3781 randomised participants). Eighteen trials did not report the primary outcomes of subjective cure, improvement of SUI or incontinence-specific quality of life (QoL). The risk of bias was generally unclear, as most trials provided little detail when reporting their methods. We assessed 25% of the included trials as being at high risk of bias for a variety of reasons, including industry funding and baseline differences between groups. We did not identify any economic evaluations.For subjective cure of SUI, we found moderate-quality evidence that ES is probably better than no active treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.02). We found a similar result for cure or improvement of SUI (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.11), but the quality of evidence was lower. We are very uncertain if there is a difference between ES and sham treatment in terms of subjective cure because of the very low quality of evidence (RR 2.21, 95% CI 0.38 to 12.73). For subjective cure or improvement, ES may be better than sham treatment (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.07). The effect estimate was 660/1000 women cured/improved with ES compared to 382/1000 with no active treatment (95% CI 538 to 805 women); and for sham treatment, 402/1000 women cured/improved with ES compared to 198/1000 with sham treatment (95% CI 202 to 805 women).Low-quality evidence suggests that there may be no difference in cure or improvement for ES versus PFMT (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03), PFMT plus ES versus PFMT alone (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.28) or ES versus vaginal cones (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.21).Electrical stimulation probably improves incontinence-specific QoL compared to no treatment (moderate quality evidence) but there may be little or no difference between electrical stimulation and PFMT (low quality evidence). It is uncertain whether adding electrical stimulation to PFMT makes any difference in terms of quality of life, compared with PFMT alone (very low quality evidence). There may be little or no difference between electrical stimulation and vaginal cones in improving incontinence-specific QoL (low quality evidence). The impact of electrical stimulation on subjective cure/improvement and incontinence-specific QoL, compared with vaginal cones, PFMT plus vaginal cones, or drugs therapy, is uncertain (very low quality evidence).In terms of subjective cure/improvement and incontinence-specific QoL, the available evidence comparing ES versus drug therapy or PFMT plus vaginal cones was very low quality and inconclusive. Similarly, comparisons of different types of ES to each other and of ES plus surgery to surgery are also inconclusive in terms of subjective cure/improvement and incontinence-specific QoL (very low-quality evidence).Adverse effects were rare: in total nine of the women treated with ES in the trials reported an adverse effect. We identified insufficient evidence to compare the risk of adverse effects in women treated with ES compared to any other treatment. We were unable to identify any economic data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The current evidence base indicated that electrical stimulation is probably more effective than no active or sham treatment, but it is not possible to say whether ES is similar to PFMT or other active treatments in effectiveness or not. Overall, the quality of the evidence was too low to provide reliable results. Without sufficiently powered trials measuring clinically important outcomes, such as subjective assessment of urinary incontinence, we cannot draw robust conclusions about the overall effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of electrical stimulation for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Stewart
- Newcastle Universityc/o Cochrane Incontinence Group, Institute of Health & SocietyBaddiley‐Clarke BuildingRichardson RoadNewcastle Upon TyneEnglandUKNE2 4AX
| | - Bary Berghmans
- Maastricht University Medical CentrePelvic Care Center MaastrichtPO Box 5800MaastrichtNetherlands6202 az
| | - Kari Bø
- Norwegian School of Sport SciencesDepartment of Sports MedicineOsloNorway
| | - Cathryn MA Glazener
- University of AberdeenHealth Services Research Unit3rd Floor, Health Sciences BuildingForesterhillAberdeenScotlandUKAB25 2ZD
| | | |
Collapse
|