"Coasting" (withholding gonadotrophins) for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology (ART). It is characterised by enlarged ovaries and an acute fluid shift from the intravascular space to the third space, resulting in bloating, increased risk of venous thromboembolism, and decreased organ perfusion. Most cases are mild, but forms of moderate or severe OHSS appear in 3% to 8% of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. Dopamine agonists were introduced as a secondary prevention intervention for OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS undergoing ART treatment.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dopamine agonists in preventing OHSS in women at high risk of developing OHSS when undergoing ART treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to 4 May 2020: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dopamine agonists on OHSS rates. We also handsearched reference lists and grey literature.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs for inclusion that compared dopamine agonists with placebo/no intervention or another intervention for preventing OHSS in ART. Primary outcome measures were incidence of moderate or severe OHSS and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of publications; selected studies; extracted data; and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements  by consensus. We reported pooled results as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. We applied GRADE criteria to judge overall quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified six new RCTs, resulting in 22 included RCTs involving 3171 women at high risk of OHSS for this updated review. The dopamine agonists were cabergoline, quinagolide, and bromocriptine. Dopamine agonists versus placebo or no intervention Dopamine agonists probably lowered the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to placebo/no intervention (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44; 10 studies, 1202 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that if the risk of moderate or severe OHSS following placebo/no intervention is assumed to be 27%, the risk following dopamine agonists would be between 8% and 14%. We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on rates of live birth (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.55; 3 studies, 362 participants; low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage  or adverse events (very low to low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists plus co-intervention versus co-intervention Dopamine agonist plus co-intervention (hydroxyethyl starch, human albumin, or withholding ovarian stimulation 'coasting') may decrease the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to co-intervention (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.84; 4 studies, 748 participants; low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists may improve rates of live birth (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.80; 2 studies, 400 participants; low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists may improve rates of clinical pregnancy and miscarriage, but we are uncertain if they improve rates of multiple pregnancy  or adverse events (very low to low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists versus other active interventions We are uncertain if cabergoline improves the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to human albumin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.38; 3 studies, 296 participants; very low-quality evidence), prednisolone (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.33; 1 study; 150 participants; very low-quality evidence), hydroxyethyl starch (OR 2.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 15.10; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-quality evidence), coasting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.95; 3 studies, 320 participants; very low-quality evidence), calcium infusion (OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.81; I² = 81%; 2 studies, 400 participants; very low-quality evidence), or diosmin (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.35 to 6.00; 1 study, 200 participants; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on rates of live birth (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.59; 2 studies, 430 participants; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy or miscarriage (low to moderate-quality evidence). There were no adverse events reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine agonists probably reduce the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS compared to placebo/no intervention, while we are uncertain of the effect on adverse events and pregnancy outcomes (live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage). Dopamine agonists plus co-intervention may decrease moderate or severe OHSS rates compared to co-intervention only, but we are uncertain whether dopamine agonists affect pregnancy outcomes. When compared to other active interventions, we are uncertain of the effects of dopamine agonists on moderate or severe OHSS and pregnancy outcomes.

Coasting (withholding gonadotrophins) for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is an iatrogenic and potentially life threatening condition resulting from excessive ovarian stimulation. Reported incidence of moderate to severe OHSS ranges from 0.6% to 5% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. The factors contributing to OHSS have not been completely explained. The release of vasoactive substances secreted by the ovaries under human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) stimulation may play a key role in triggering this syndrome. This condition is characterised by a massive shift of fluid from the intravascular compartment to the third space, resulting in profound intravascular depletion and haemoconcentration.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of withholding gonadotrophins (coasting) on the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

For the update of this review, we searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (PubMed), CINHAL, PsycINFO, Embase, Google, and clinicaltrials.gov to 6 July 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which coasting was used to prevent OHSS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials and extracted data. They resolved disagreements by discussion. They contacted study authors to request additional information or missing data. The intervention comparisons were coasting versus no coasting, coasting versus early unilateral follicular aspiration (EUFA), coasting versus gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist (antagonist), coasting versus follicle stimulating hormone administration at the time of hCG trigger (FSH co-trigger), and coasting versus cabergoline. We performed statistical analysis in accordance with Cochrane guidelines. Our primary outcomes were moderate or severe OHSS and live birth.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs (702 women at high risk of developing OHSS). The quality of evidence was low or very low. The main limitations were failure to report live birth, risk of bias due to lack of information about study methods, and imprecision due to low event rates and lack of data. Four of the studies were published only as abstracts, and provided limited data. Coasting versus no coastingRates of OHSS were lower in the coasting group (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.24; I² = 0%, two RCTs; 207 women; low-quality evidence), suggesting that if 45% of women developed moderate or severe OHSS without coasting, between 4% and 17% of women would develop it with coasting. There were too few data to determine whether there was a difference between the groups in rates of live birth (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.62; one RCT; 68 women; very low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.44; I² = 0%; two RCTs; 207 women; low-quality evidence), multiple pregnancy (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.81; one RCT; 139 women; low-quality evidence), or miscarriage (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.86; I² = 0%; two RCTs; 207 women; very low-quality evidence). Coasting versus EUFAThere were too few data to determine whether there was a difference between the groups in rates of OHSS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.85; I² = 0%; 2 RCTs; 83 women; very low-quality evidence), or clinical pregnancy (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.79; I² = 0%; 2 RCTs; 83 women; very low-quality evidence); no studies reported live birth, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage. Coasting versus antagonistOne RCT (190 women) reported this comparison, and no events of OHSS occurred in either arm. There were too few data to determine whether there was a difference between the groups in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.31; one RCT; 190 women; low-quality evidence), or multiple pregnancy rates (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.32; one RCT; 98 women; very low-quality evidence); the study did not report live birth or miscarriage. Coasting versus FSH co-triggerRates of OHSS were higher in the coasting group (OR 43.74, 95% CI 2.54 to 754.58; one RCT; 102 women; very low-quality evidence), with 15 events in the coasting arm and none in the FSH co-trigger arm. There were too few data to determine whether there was a difference between the groups in clinical pregnancy rates (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.10; one RCT; 102 women; low-quality evidence). This study did not report data suitable for analysis on live birth, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage, but stated that there was no significant difference between the groups. Coasting versus cabergolineThere were too few data to determine whether there was a difference between the groups in rates of OHSS (OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.09 to 5.68; P = 0.20; I² = 72%; two RCTs; 120 women; very low-quality evidence), with 11 events in the coasting arm and six in the cabergoline arm. The evidence suggested that coasting was associated with lower rates of clinical pregnancy (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.88; P = 0.02; I² =0%; two RCTs; 120 women; very low-quality evidence), but there were only 33 events altogether. These studies did not report data suitable for analysis on live birth, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was low-quality evidence to suggest that coasting reduced rates of moderate or severe OHSS more than no coasting. There was no evidence to suggest that coasting was more beneficial than other interventions, except that there was very low-quality evidence from a single small study to suggest that using FSH co-trigger at the time of HCG administration may be better at reducing the risk of OHSS than coasting. There were too few data to determine clearly whether there was a difference between the groups for any other outcomes.

Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology (ART). It is characterised by enlarged ovaries and an acute fluid shift from the intravascular space to the third space, resulting in bloating, increased risk of venous thromboembolism and decreased organ perfusion. Most cases are mild, but forms of moderate or severe OHSS appear in 3% to 8% of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. The dopamine agonist cabergoline was introduced as a secondary prevention intervention for OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS undergoing ART treatment. As cabergoline seemed to be effective in preventing OHSS, other types of dopamine agonists, such as quinagolide and bromocriptine, have since been studied in ART to prevent OHSS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of dopamine agonists in preventing OHSS in high-risk women undergoing ART treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched several databases from inception to August 2016 (Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register of trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dopamine agonist in preventing OHSS. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs which compared dopamine agonists with placebo/no intervention or another intervention for preventing OHSS in high-risk women for inclusion. Primary outcome measures were incidence of moderate or severe OHSS and live birth rate. Secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and any other adverse effects of the treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts of publications, selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We resolved any disagreements by consensus. We reported pooled results as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. In addition, we graded the overall quality of the evidence using GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified 14 new RCTs since the last published version of this review, resulting in 16 included RCTs involving 2091 high-risk women for this updated review. They evaluated three types of dopamine agonists: cabergoline, quinagolide and bromocriptine.When compared with placebo or no intervention, dopamine agonists seemed effective in the prevention of moderate or severe OHSS (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.39; 1022 participants; 8 studies; I² = 0%; moderate quality evidence). This suggests that if 29% of women undergoing ART experience moderate or severe OHSS, the use of dopamine agonists will lower this to 7% to 14% of women. There was no evidence of a difference in live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate (very low to moderate quality evidence). However, taking dopamine agonists (especially quinagolide) may increase the incidence of adverse events such as gastrointestinal adverse effects (OR 4.54, 95% CI 1.49 to 13.84; 264 participants; 2 studies; I² = 49%, very low quality evidence).When we compared dopamine agonist plus co-intervention with co-intervention, there was no evidence of a difference in the outcomes of moderate or severe OHSS, live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or adverse events. The co-interventions were hydroxyethyl starch (two RCTs) and albumin (one RCT).Cabergoline was associated with a lower risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared with human albumin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.38; 296 participants; 3 studies; I² = 72%). However, there was no evidence of a difference between cabergoline and hydroxyethyl starch, coasting (withholding any more ovarian stimulation for a few days) or prednisolone. There was an increased clinical pregnancy rate in the cabergoline group when cabergoline was compared with coasting (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.13 to 6.21; 120 participants; 2 studies; I² = 0%). In other respects, there was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate or miscarriage rate between cabergoline and other active interventions.The quality of the evidence between dopamine agonist and placebo or no intervention ranged from very low to moderate, mainly due to poor reporting of study methods (mostly a lack of details on randomisation or blinding) and serious imprecision for some comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Dopamine agonists appear to reduce the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS (moderate quality evidence). If a fresh embryo transfer is performed, the use of dopamine agonists does not affect the pregnancy outcome (live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate) (very low to moderate quality evidence). However, dopamine agonists might increase the risk of adverse events, such as gastrointestinal symptoms. Further research should focus on dose-finding, comparisons with other effective treatments and consideration of combination treatments. Therefore, large, well-designed and well-executed RCTs that involve more clinical endpoints (e.g., live birth rate) are necessary to further evaluate the role of dopamine agonists in OHSS prevention.

Update in polycystic ovary syndrome: new criteria of diagnosis and treatment in Japan

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most frequent endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age. In 2006 the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) proposed new, revised diagnostic criteria that in the future could also be valued internationally. Based on the new diagnostic criteria, the JSOG has also proposed the revised treatment criteria in 2008. In PCOS obese patients desiring children, weight loss and exercise is recommended. Nonobese patients, or those obese women who do not ovulate after lifestyle changes, are submitted to ovulation-induction therapy with clomiphene citrate (CC). Obese CC-resistant patients who have impaired glucose tolerance or insulin resistance are treated with a combination of metformin and CC. If these treatments options are unsuccessful, ovulation induction with exogenous gonadotropin therapy or laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is recommended. A low-dose step-up regimen is recommended with careful monitoring in order to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancies. Alternatively, with LOD high successful pregnancy rates of around 60 % are expected with a low risk of multiple pregnancies. If ovulation induction is unsuccessful, IVF-ET treatment is indicated. In high OHSS-risk patients, systematic embryo freezing and subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycles are recommended. In nonobese, anovulatory PCOS patients not desiring children, pharmacological treatments such as Holmström, Kaufmann regimens or low-dose oral anticonceptives are used to induce regular withdrawal bleeding. These treatments are especially important for preventing endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. These new diagnostic and treatment criteria hopefully will contribute to an improved care of PCOS patients in Japan.

GnRH analogues in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

The GnRH analogue (agonist and antagonist GnRH) changed ovarian stimulation. On the one hand, it improved chances of pregnancy to obtain more oocytes and better embryos. This leads to an ovarian hyper-response, which can be complicated by the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). On the other hand, the GnRH analogue can prevent the incidence of OHSS: GnRH antagonist protocols, GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation, either together or separately, coasting, and the GnRH analogue may prove useful for avoiding OHSS in high-risk patients. We review these topics in this article.

Serum FSH Levels in Coasting Programmes on the hCG Day and Their Clinical Outcomes in IVF ± ICSI Cycles

Introduction. Coasting is the most commonly used strategy in prevention of severe OHSS. Serum FSH levels measurements during coasting may aid in optimizing the duration of coasting. Objective(s). To study live birth rates (LBRs), clinical pregnancy rates (CPRs), and optimal duration of coasting based on serum FSH levels on the hCG day. Materials and Methods. It is a retrospective study performed between 2005 and 2008 at Barts and The London Centre for Reproductive Medicine, NHS Trust, London, UK, on 349-coasted women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF ± ICSI. The serum FSH level measurements on the hCG day during coasting programme were analysed to predict the LBR and CPR. Result(s). LBR and CPR were significantly higher when the FSH levels on the hCG day were >2.5 IU/L (LBR: 32.5%, P = 0.045 and CPR: 36.9%, P = 0.027) compared to FSH <2.5 IU/L. The optimal FSH cut-off level for LBR and CPR is 5.6 IU/L on the hCG day. The optimal cutoff for coasting is 4 days. Conclusion(s). Coasting may be continued as long as either serum FSH level is > 2.5 IU/L on the hCG day without compromising the LBR and CPR or to maximum of 4 days.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention

PURPOSE

To review and discuss the pathophysiology and prevention strategies for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), which is a condition that may occur in up to 20% of the high risk women submitted to assisted reproductive technology cycles.

METHODS

The English language literature on these topics were reviewed through PubMed and discussed with emphasis on recent data.

RESULTS

The role of estradiol, luteinizing hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), inflammatory mediators, the renin-angiotensin system and vascular endothelial growth factor is discussed in the pathophysiology of OHSS. In addition we consider the prevention strategies, including coasting, administration of albumin, renin-angiotensin system blockage, dopamine agonist administration, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory administration, GnRH antagonist protocols, reducing hCG dosage, replacement of hCG and in vitro maturation of oocytes (IVM).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the many prevention strategies that have been discussed, the current evidence points to the replacement of hCG by GnRH agonists in antagonist cycles and the performance of IVM procedures as the safest approaches.

Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility

BACKGROUND Recent advances in our understanding of the causes of infertility and of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have led to the development of complex diagnostic tools, prognostic models and treatment options. The Third Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Meeting was held on 26-27 April 2008 to evaluate evidence supporting current approaches to the diagnosis and management of infertility and to identify areas for future research efforts. METHODS Specialist reproductive medicine clinicians and scientists delivered presentations based on published literature and ongoing research on patient work-up, ovarian stimulation and embryo quality assessment during ART. This report is based on the expert presentations and subsequent group discussions and was supplemented with publications from literature searches and the authors' knowledge. RESULTS It was agreed that single embryo transfer (SET) should be used with increasing frequency in cycles of ART. Continued improvements in cryopreservation techniques, which improve pregnancy rates using supernumerary frozen embryos, are expected to augment the global uptake of SET. Adaptation and personalization of fertility therapy may help to optimize efficacy and safety outcomes for individual patients. Prognostic modelling and personalized management strategies based on individual patient characteristics may prove to represent real progress towards improved treatment. However, at present, there is limited good-quality evidence to support the use of these individualized approaches. CONCLUSIONS Greater quality control and standardization of clinical and laboratory evaluations are required to optimize ART practices and improve individual patient outcomes. Well-designed, good-quality studies are required to drive improvements to the diagnosis and management of ART processes.

Cumulative first live birth after elective cryopreservation of all embryos due to ovarian hyperresponsiveness

OBJECTIVE

To estimate cumulative chance for first live birth after elective pronuclear stage cryopreservation of all embryos due to ovarian hyperresponsiveness.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis with longitudinal follow-up.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty subjects with elective cryopreservation of all embryos due to ovarian hyperresponsiveness.

INTERVENTION(S)

Elective cryopreservation of all embryos at the pronuclear stage (n = 30) and subsequent cryopreserved-thawed ET (n = 51).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cumulative chance for first live birth.

RESULT(S)

Cumulative chance for first live birth was 77% when analyzed by intention to treat and 82% by treatment with ET. Nearly 40% of live births were multiple.

CONCLUSION(S)

Cumulative first live birth increased with repetitive ET after elective pronuclear stage cryopreservation of all embryos due to ovarian hyperresponsiveness. Multiple births, however, were frequent. In the context of initial ET attempts in young women, transfer of no more than two cryopreserved-thawed embryos is advised.

Value of the serum estradiol level for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a retrospective case control study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of different serum E(2) cut-off levels for predicting women at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study of a cohort of women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment (ART) over 12 months.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

The study group included women with OHSS who fulfilled the endocrine inclusion criteria (n = 40). The control group was a random sample (n = 40) from the cohort of women undergoing ART.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of different serum E(2) cut-off levels on day 11 of ovarian stimulation in preventing the establishment of OHSS.

RESULT(S)

Three hundred ninety-nine cycles (IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection) were undertaken between June 2000 and May 2001. The study group (n = 40) was compared with the control group (n = 40) undergoing ART during the same period of time. On day 8 of ovarian stimulation, the mean (SD) E(2) level in the study group was 8,517(5.3) pmol/L (2,320 pg/mL), and in the control group it was 2,540 (2.6) pmol/L (691 pg/mL). On day 11 of stimulation the mean (SD) E(2) level was 15,662 (4.2) pmol/L (4,266 pg/mL) and 5,804 (4.5) pmol/L (1,581 pg/mL), respectively. Twenty-four (60%) women who developed OHSS had E(2)levels >6,000 pmol/L (1,634 pg/mL) on day 8 and above 11,000 pmol/L (2,996 pg/mL) on day 11. Sixteen (40%) had E(2) levels <6,000 pmol/L (1,634 pg/mL) on day 8, but all had levels above 11,000 pmol/l (2,996 pg/mL) on day 11.

CONCLUSION(S)

A serum E(2) level of 12,315 pmol/L (3,354 pg/mL) on day 11 of ovarian stimulation gives a sensitivity and specificity of 85% for the detection of women at risk for OHSS.

Assisted reproduction in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome

Treatment of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with assisted reproductive techniques is a great challenge for the infertility specialist. Patients with PCOS demonstrate many problems, such as excessive body weight and hyperinsulinaemia, that render management more complex. Prior to treatment with IVF, the PCOS patient should be thoroughly evaluated for disclosure of endometrial neoplasia, hyperinsulinaemia, and other general health related problems. Ovarian stimulation for IVF carries the risks of overstimulation and severe hyperstimulation, which should be avoidable in most cases with preventive measures. The outcome in terms of pregnancy and implantation rates is similar for patients with PCOS when compared with patients undergoing IVF for other indications. There are some questions regarding oocyte and embryo quality in women with PCOS. This manifests itself in lower fertilization rate and decreased embryo quality in some studies. However, increased numbers of oocytes available for insemination or ICSI compensate for decreased fertilization rates and embryo quality. More recent studies suggest higher cumulative conception rates in women with PCOS when compared with controls. In-vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes retrieved from non-stimulated or minimally stimulated cycles represents a viable option that should be considered seriously when assisted conception is attempted. Results of IVM, however, should be improved further and generalized before the technique can be advocated as the initial treatment approach in these patients.