Percutaneous Gastrostomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition plays a central role in managing necrotizing pancreatitis (NP). Although the nasojejunal (NJ) route is widely used, percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG-J) is an alternative technique that is also applied commonly. We hypothesized that NJ and PEG-J had similar morbidity in the setting of NP.

METHODS

All patients receiving preoperative enteral nutrition before surgical debridement for NP (2005-2015) were segregated into NJ or PEG-J.

RESULTS

A total of 242 patients had complete data for analysis (155 men/87 women; median age 54 years; 47% biliary and 16% alcohol-related pancreatitis). NJ was used exclusively in 187 patients (77%); 25 patients (10%) were fed exclusively by PEG-J; the remaining 30 patients (13%) had NJ first, followed by PEG-J. Equal proportions of NJ and PEG-J patients reached enteral feeding goal (67% vs. 68%, p ≈ 1) and increased serum albumin (39% vs. 36%, p = 0.87). No difference was seen in rate of pancreatic necrosis infection (NJ 53% vs. PEG-J 49%, p = 0.64). NJ patients had significantly more complications compared to PEG-J (51%vs.27%,p = 0.0015). However, NJ patients had more grade I/II complication, compared to PEG-J patients, who had more grade III/IV complication (Grade I/II: NJ 51%vs. PEG-J 16%; Grade III/IV NJ 0%vs. PEG-J 11%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In necrotizing pancreatitis, NJ and PEG-J both delivered enteral nutrition effectively. Patients with NJ feeding had significantly more complications than those with PEG-J; however, NJ complications were less severe.

Managing patients with gastrostomy tubes in the community: can a dedicated enteral feed dietetic service reduce hospital readmissions?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Post-gastrostomy complications range from 8 to 30%. These complications often occur following discharge into the community and may result in hospital readmission. Our unit previously reported a readmission rate of 23% in 6 months. There is a paucity of data evaluating community gastrostomy management. We therefore aimed to evaluate the benefits of a dedicated dietetic home enteral feed (HEF) team.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Demographic data, gastrostomy complications, readmission rates and HEF team input was prospectively collected from a cohort of discharged gastrostomy patients over a 1-year period and comparisons made with a similar historical cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 371 complications were encountered in 313 gastrostomy patients during this period, with the commonest complication being over-granulated stoma sites (27%). Of these, 227 hospital admissions were avoided because of direct actions taken by the HEF team. Fifty-nine gastrostomy patients were admitted to the hospital, of which only seven (12%) were specifically for gastrostomy-related problems. Introduction of the HEF team significantly reduced gastrostomy-related hospital readmissions from 23 to 2% (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although patients with gastrostomies may need attention to a variety of complex medical problems, many encounter problems specifically related to their gastrostomy after discharge. This is the largest prospective study demonstrating how dietitians trained in gastrostomy aftercare may optimize the management of gastrostomy complications and reduce unnecessary hospital readmissions.