1
|
Tain YL, Hsu CN. Nutritional Approaches Targeting Gut Microbiota in Oxidative-Stress-Associated Metabolic Syndrome: Focus on Early Life Programming. Nutrients 2024; 16:683. [PMID: 38474810 DOI: 10.3390/nu16050683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) denotes a constellation of risk factors associated with the development of cardiovascular disease, with its roots potentially traced back to early life. Given the pivotal role of oxidative stress and dysbiotic gut microbiota in MetS pathogenesis, comprehending their influence on MetS programming is crucial. Targeting these mechanisms during the early stages of life presents a promising avenue for preventing MetS later in life. This article begins by examining detrimental insults during early life that impact fetal programming, ultimately contributing to MetS in adulthood. Following that, we explore the role of oxidative stress and the dysregulation of gut microbiota in the initiation of MetS programming. The review also consolidates existing evidence on how gut-microbiota-targeted interventions can thwart oxidative-stress-associated MetS programming, encompassing approaches such as probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and the modulation of bacterial metabolites. While animal studies demonstrate the favorable effects of gut-microbiota-targeted therapy in mitigating MetS programming, further clinical investigations are imperative to enhance our understanding of manipulating gut microbiota and oxidative stress for the prevention of MetS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Lin Tain
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
- Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Ning Hsu
- Department of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
- School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seif El Dahan K, Bejjani J, Nasrallah AA, Youssef L, Mladenovic A, Dosch L, Leone A, Jurjus A. Probiotics Properties: A Focus on Pregnancy Outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 272:16-23. [PMID: 35278924 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
A healthy microbiome plays an important role in the prevention of illness and maintenance of overall health, including reproductive health. Although the therapeutic advantages of probiotics have been shown to run across multiple organ systems, their role in pregnancy is not well explored. The aim of this review is to highlight the potential advantages and adverse effects of probiotics in pregnancy. Data were collected from the literature over the past decade using PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, and Science Direct. A total of 40 articles were utilized in this review. Collected data indicated that prenatal and post-natal supplementation with lactobacilli alone or lactobacilli with Bifidobacterium spp. seems to be protective. Probiotics may improve insulin resistance and consequently reduce the risk of gestational diabetes. Probiotics may also reduce anxiety and depression by influencing brain activity. Additionally, they interfere with vaginal flora to make it friendlier to beneficial bacteria, and enhance anti-inflammatory or reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines. They may also decrease eczema in breastfed infants and prevent allergic reactions by downregulating Th2 responses to specific allergens from mid to late gestation. Leveraging the cervicovaginal microbiota could promote a number of positive pregnancy-related health outcomes. Caution should be exercised in the selection, dosing, and monitoring of probiotics administration. More comprehensive randomized clinical trials are needed to reach a more meaningful evidence-based clinical knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Bejjani
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Ali A Nasrallah
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Lara Youssef
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon.
| | | | - Laura Dosch
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
| | - Angelo Leone
- Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Neuroscience, Section of Histology and Embryology, University of Palermo, Italy.
| | - Abdo Jurjus
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng T, Liu Y. Microorganisms in the reproductive system and probiotic's regulatory effects on reproductive health. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022; 20:1541-1553. [PMID: 35465162 PMCID: PMC9010680 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of microbial communities in the reproductive tract has been revealed, and this resident microbiota is involved in the maintenance of health. Intentional modulation via probiotics has been proposed as a possible strategy to enhance reproductive health and reduce the risk of diseases. The male seminal microbiota has been suggested as an important factor that influences a couple’s health, pregnancy outcomes, and offspring health. Probiotics have been reported to play a role in male fertility and to affect the health of mothers and offspring. While the female reproductive microbiota is more complicated and has been identified in both the upper and lower reproductive systems, they together contribute to health maintenance. Probiotics have shown regulatory effects on the female reproductive tract, thereby contributing to homeostasis of the tract and influencing the health of offspring. Further, through transmission of bacteria or through other indirect mechanisms, the parent’s reproductive microbiota and probiotic intervention influence infant gut colonization and immunity development, with potential health consequences. In vitro and in vivo studies have explored the mechanisms underlying the benefits of probiotic administration and intervention, and an array of positive results, such as modulation of microbiota composition, regulation of metabolism, promotion of the epithelial barrier, and improvement of immune function, have been observed. Herein, we review the state of the art in reproductive system microbiota and its role in health and reproduction, as well as the beneficial effects of probiotics on reproductive health and their contributions to the prevention of associated diseases.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yadav J, Das V, Kumar N, Agrawal S, Pandey A, Agrawal A. Vaginal probiotics as an adjunct to antibiotic prophylaxis in the management of preterm premature rupture of the membranes. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2022; 42:1037-1042. [PMID: 35019789 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1993803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) is a major risk factor contributing to approximately one third of preterm deliveries. Vaginal infections are often associated with PPROM and are characterised by loss of lactobacillin normal vaginal flora and overgrowth of other pathogenic microorganisms. Probiotics appear to have an emerging role in prolonging pregnancy after PPROM. This trial compared the efficacy of a vaginal probiotic in combination with standard antibiotic prophylaxis versus only antibiotic in prolongation of latency period and on perinatal outcome in cases of PPROM between 24 and 34 weeks. Although no significant difference was observed in the mean latency period (p = 0.937) and mean gestational age at birth (p = 0.863) between the two groups, the overall neonatal outcome was better in the study group. There is need of further large-scale clinical trials to demonstrate effectiveness of probiotics.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? PPROM is an important cause of preterm birth. Prematurity leads significant global burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Antibiotics in PPROM have a proven benefit to prolong latency period from start of PPROM to birth. Probiotics have a role in improving vaginal flora and reducing infections and have been tried in PPROM.What do the results of this study add? The usefulness of probiotics in prolonging latency period and improving neonatal outcome has been reported in limited trials. In our study it has shown an improvement in neonatal outcome overall but not statistically significant compared to few studies which have reported significant beneficial effects. This might be due to existence of variation in the type of the vaginal microflora in different study population.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Preliminary results suggest that use of probiotic may benefit women with PPROM. This also implies need of multicentric larger scales trials with different types of probiotics so as to clarify whether any intervention in vaginal microflora can lead to any benefits in reducing the prematurity and its consequence, both on the neonate and heath care infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyoti Yadav
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Vinita Das
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Namrata Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Smriti Agrawal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Amita Pandey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Anjoo Agrawal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barthow C, Wickens K, Stanley T, Mitchell EA, Maude R, Abels P, Purdie G, Murphy R, Stone P, Kang J, Hood F, Rowden J, Barnes P, Fitzharris P, Craig J, Slykerman RF, Crane J. The Probiotics in Pregnancy Study (PiP Study): rationale and design of a double-blind randomised controlled trial to improve maternal health during pregnancy and prevent infant eczema and allergy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:133. [PMID: 27255079 PMCID: PMC4891898 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide there is increasing interest in the manipulation of human gut microbiota by the use of probiotic supplements to modify or prevent a range of communicable and non-communicable diseases. Probiotic interventions administered during pregnancy and breastfeeding offer a unique opportunity to influence a range of important maternal and infant outcomes. The aim of the Probiotics in Pregnancy Study (PiP Study) is to assess if supplementation by the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 administered to women from early pregnancy and while breastfeeding can reduce the rates of infant eczema and atopic sensitisation at 1 year, and maternal gestational diabetes mellitus, bacterial vaginosis and Group B Streptococcal vaginal colonisation before birth, and depression and anxiety postpartum. METHODS/DESIGN The PiP Study is a two-centre, randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in Wellington and Auckland, New Zealand. Four hundred pregnant women expecting infants at high risk of allergic disease will be enrolled in the study at 14-16 weeks gestation and randomised to receive either Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (6 × 10(9) colony-forming units per day (cfu/day)) or placebo until delivery and then continuing until 6 months post-partum, if breastfeeding. Primary infant outcomes are the development and severity of eczema and atopic sensitisation in the first year of life. Secondary outcomes are diagnosis of maternal gestational diabetes mellitus, presence of bacterial vaginosis and vaginal carriage of Group B Streptococcus (at 35-37 weeks gestation). Other outcome measures include maternal weight gain, maternal postpartum depression and anxiety, infant birth weight, preterm birth, and rate of caesarean sections. A range of samples including maternal and infant faecal samples, maternal blood samples, cord blood and infant cord tissue samples, breast milk, infant skin swabs and infant buccal swabs will be collected for the investigation of the mechanisms of probiotic action. DISCUSSION The study will investigate if mother-only supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in pregnancy and while breastfeeding can reduce rates of eczema and atopic sensitisation in infants by 1 year, and reduce maternal rates of gestational diabetes mellitus, bacterial vaginosis, vaginal carriage of Group B Streptococcus before birth and maternal depression and anxiety postpartum. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration: ACTRN12612000196842. Date Registered: 15/02/12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Barthow
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand.
| | - Kristin Wickens
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Thorsten Stanley
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Edwin A Mitchell
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Robyn Maude
- Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Victoria University of Wellington, P O Box 7625, Newtown, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Peter Abels
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Gordon Purdie
- Dean's Department, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Rinki Murphy
- Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Peter Stone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Janice Kang
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Fiona Hood
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Judy Rowden
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Phillipa Barnes
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Penny Fitzharris
- Immunology Department, Auckland Hospital, Private Bag 92024, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Jeffrey Craig
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia
| | - Rebecca F Slykerman
- Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Julian Crane
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, 6242, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Holst D, Garnier Y. Preterm birth and inflammation-The role of genetic polymorphisms. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 141:3-9. [PMID: 18783866 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2007] [Revised: 06/16/2008] [Accepted: 07/11/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Spontaneous preterm labour and preterm births are still the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. Previous efforts to prevent preterm birth have been hampered by a poor understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, inadequate diagnostic tools and generally ineffective therapies. Clinical, epidemiological and experimental studies indicate that genito-urinary tract infections play a critical role in the pathogenesis of preterm birth. Moreover, intrauterine infection increases perinatal mortality and morbidity, such as cerebral palsy and chronic lung disease, significantly. It has recently been suggested that gene-environment interactions play a significant role in determining the risk of preterm birth. Polymorphisms of certain critical genes may be responsible for a harmful inflammatory response in those who possess them. Accordingly, polymorphisms that increase the magnitude or the duration of the inflammatory response were associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. In contrast polymorphisms that decrease the inflammatory response were associated with a lower risk of preterm birth. This article will review the current understanding of pathogenetic pathways in the aetiology of preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Holst
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|