Carotid endarterectomy for carotid stenosis in patients selected for coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Coexisting Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease - Which Technique and in Which Order? Case Report and Review of Literature

Coexisting carotid artery stenosis and coronary artery disease is common and there is currently no consensus in treatment guidelines on the timing, sequence and methods of revascularization. We report a case of a patient with symptomatic triple vessel coronary artery disease as well as asymptomatic severe right internal carotid artery stenosis. Our patient underwent myocardial revascularization first, because she presented with unstable angina and was asymptomatic neurologically. This article summarizes current literature about the approach to carotid and coronary artery revascularization and addresses the decision-making process regarding the timing and sequence of revascularization.

Assessment of vulnerable and unstable carotid atherosclerotic plaques on endarterectomy specimens

The types of lesion instability responsible for the majority of acute coronary events frequently include plaque disruption and plaque erosion with superimposed thrombosis. The term 'vulnerable plaque is used to describe atherosclerotic (ATS) plaques that are particularly prone to rupture and susceptible to thrombus formation, such as the thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). The aim of the present study was to assess the morphological and histological differences between plaques that are unstable and those that are vulnerable to instability. Carotid artery endarterectomy specimens were obtained from 26 patients with carotid artery stenosis, consisting of 20 men and 6 women (age range, 35-80 years). Histological and morphometric methods were used to visualize and characterize the ATS plaques. Among the 26 carotid ATS plaques, 23% were stable, 23% were unstable and 54% were vulnerable. With regard to morphometric characteristics, the following mean values were obtained for the TCFA and unstable plaques, respectively: Fibrous cap thickness, 21.91 and 11.66 µM; proportion of necrotic core area in the total plaque area, 25.90 and 22.03%; and the proportion of inflammatory area in the total plaque area, 8.41 and 3.04%. No plaque calcification was observed in any of them. Since ATS coronary artery disease is considerably widespread and fatal, it is crucial to further study ATS lesions to obtain an improved understanding of the nature of vulnerable and unstable plaques. The methods used to detect plaque size, necrotic core area and fibrous cap thickness are considered to be particularly useful for identifying vulnerable and unstable plaques.

Effect of hypothermia in patients undergoing simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Purpose

We sought to determine whether hypothermia provided any benefit in patients undergoing simultaneous coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using one of two different surgical strategies.

Methods

Group 1 patients (n = 34, 88.2% male, mean age 65.94 ± 6.67 years) underwent CEA under moderate hypothermia before cross clamping the aorta, whereas group 2 patients (n = 23, 69.6% male, mean age 65.78 ± 9.29 years) underwent CEA under normothermic conditions before initiating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of any new neurological event.

Results

The two groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics. Permanent impairment occurred in one patient (2.9%) in group 1. One patient from each group (2.9 and 4.3%) had transient neurological events and they recovered completely on the sixth and 11th postoperative days, respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to occurrence of early neurological outcomes (n = 2, 5.8% vs n = 1, 4.3%, p = 0.12).

Conclusions

This study could not provide evidence regarding benefit of hypothermia in simultaneous operations for carotid and coronary artery disease because of the low occurrence rate of adverse outcomes. The single-stage operation is safe and completion of the CEA before CPB may be considered when short duration of CPB is required.

Carotid stenosis management: a review for the internist

Stroke is one of the most important causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide and, for a long time, was the leading cause of death in developed countries. Atherothrombotic carotid stenosis is one of the most important etiologies behind this event. If properly recognized and treated, lives can be saved, as well as long-term disabilities prevented. With population aging and improvements in surgical and clinical care, patients with several comorbidities will be referred for revascularization procedures more frequently, posing a challenge for physicians. The purpose of this review is to provide internists and clinicians with information based on several studies so they can offer to their patients, the best evidence-based care, indicating appropriate medical therapy, as well as referral to a vascular surgeon, or what contraindicates endarterectomy or angioplasty, depending on individual characteristics.

Advances in the management of carotid artery disease: focus on recent evidence and guidelines

Recent landmark randomized trials and society guidelines have significantly revised the management of carotid artery disease. Duplex ultrasonography is the recommended initial diagnostic test for the assessment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis. Carotid artery imaging is reasonable in select patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Carotid revascularization can be achieved safely and effectively with carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting. Because each procedure has a different risk/benefit profile, the optimal approach is to match the particular patient to the intervention that maximizes outcome benefit. Carotid revascularization is recommended in patients scheduled for CABG surgery when the carotid artery stenosis is symptomatic and/or bilateral. Further trials are required to guide the management of asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing CABG surgery. Aggressive medical therapy remains the gold standard for intracranial carotid artery disease because landmark trials have shown no outcome improvement with vascular bypass or percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. A large recent trial showed that local anesthesia, as compared with general anesthesia, for carotid endarterectomy has no major clinical outcome advantage. Although carotid artery stenting is associated with a reduced risk of myocardial ischemia, it still has important risks of stroke and hemodynamic instability that significantly affect clinical outcome. The timing and choice of carotid revascularization technique ultimately depends on multiple clinical factors.