1
|
Tate K, Penconek T, Booth A, Harvey G, Flynn R, Lalleman P, Wolbers I, Hoben M, Estabrooks CA, Cummings GG. Contextually appropriate nurse staffing models: a realist review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082883. [PMID: 38719308 PMCID: PMC11086385 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Decisions about nurse staffing models are a concern for health systems globally due to workforce retention and well-being challenges. Nurse staffing models range from all Registered Nurse workforce to a mix of differentially educated nurses and aides (regulated and unregulated), such as Licensed Practical or Vocational Nurses and Health Care Aides. Systematic reviews have examined relationships between specific nurse staffing models and client, staff and health system outcomes (eg, mortality, adverse events, retention, healthcare costs), with inconclusive or contradictory results. No evidence has been synthesised and consolidated on how, why and under what contexts certain staffing models produce different outcomes. We aim to describe how we will (1) conduct a realist review to determine how nurse staffing models produce different client, staff and health system outcomes, in which contexts and through what mechanisms and (2) coproduce recommendations with decision-makers to guide future research and implementation of nurse staffing models. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using an integrated knowledge translation approach with researchers and decision-makers as partners, we are conducting a three-phase realist review. In this protocol, we report on the final two phases of this realist review. We will use Citation tracking, tracing Lead authors, identifying Unpublished materials, Google Scholar searching, Theory tracking, ancestry searching for Early examples, and follow-up of Related projects (CLUSTER) searching, specifically designed for realist searches as the review progresses. We will search empirical evidence to test identified programme theories and engage stakeholders to contextualise findings, finalise programme theories document our search processes as per established realist review methods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for this study was provided by the Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Alberta (Study ID Pro00100425). We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, national and international conference presentations, regional briefing sessions, webinars and lay summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Tate
- College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tatiana Penconek
- College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Gillian Harvey
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rachel Flynn
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Inge Wolbers
- University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Matthias Hoben
- School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carole A Estabrooks
- College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Greta G Cummings
- College of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Putrik P, Grobler L, Lalor A, Ramsay H, Gorelik A, Karnon J, Parker D, Morgan M, Buchbinder R, O'Connor D. Models for delivery and co-ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD013880. [PMID: 38426600 PMCID: PMC10905654 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013880.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of older people is increasing worldwide and public expenditure on residential aged care facilities (ACFs) is expected to at least double, and possibly triple, by 2050. Co-ordinated and timely care in residential ACFs that reduces unnecessary hospital transfers may improve residents' health outcomes and increase satisfaction with care among ACF residents, their families and staff. These benefits may outweigh the resources needed to sustain the changes in care delivery and potentially lead to cost savings. Our systematic review comprehensively and systematically presents the available evidence of the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of alternative models of providing health care to ACF residents. OBJECTIVES Main objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of alternative models of delivering primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in ACFs. Secondary objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of the alternative models. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, five other databases and two trials registers (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov) on 26 October 2022, together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included individual and cluster-randomised trials, and cost/cost-effectiveness data collected alongside eligible effectiveness studies. Eligible study participants included older people who reside in an ACF as their place of permanent abode and healthcare professionals delivering or co-ordinating the delivery of healthcare at ACFs. Eligible interventions focused on either ways of delivering primary or secondary health care (or both) or ways of co-ordinating the delivery of this care. Eligible comparators included usual care or another model of care. Primary outcomes were emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions and adverse effects (defined as infections, falls and pressure ulcers). Secondary outcomes included adherence to clinical guideline-recommended care, health-related quality of life of residents, mortality, resource use, access to primary or specialist healthcare services, any hospital admissions, length of hospital stay, satisfaction with the health care by residents and their families, work-related satisfaction and work-related stress of ACF staff. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary comparison was any alternative model of care versus usual care. MAIN RESULTS We included 40 randomised trials (21,787 participants; three studies only reported number of beds) in this review. Included trials evaluated alternative models of care aimed at either all residents of the ACF (i.e. no specific health condition; 11 studies), ACF residents with mental health conditions or behavioural problems (12 studies), ACF residents with a specific condition (e.g. residents with pressure ulcers, 13 studies) or residents requiring a specific type of care (e.g. residents after hospital discharge, four studies). Most alternative models of care focused on 'co-ordination of care' (n = 31). Three alternative models of care focused on 'who provides care' and two focused on 'where care is provided' (i.e. care provided within ACF versus outside of ACF). Four models focused on the use of information and communication technology. Usual care, the comparator in all studies, was highly heterogeneous across studies and, in most cases, was poorly reported. Most of the included trials were susceptible to some form of bias; in particular, performance (89%), reporting (66%) and detection (42%) bias. Compared to usual care, alternative models of care may make little or no difference to the proportion of residents with at least one emergency department visit (risk ratio (RR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.20; 7 trials, 1276 participants; low-certainty evidence), but may reduce the proportion of residents with at least one unplanned hospital admission (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.99, I2 = 53%; 8 trials, 1263 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of alternative models of care on adverse events (proportion of residents with a fall: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.60, I² = 74%; 3 trials, 1061 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and adherence to guideline-recommended care (proportion of residents receiving adequate antidepressant medication: RR 5.29, 95% CI 1.08 to 26.00; 1 study, 65 participants) as the certainty of the evidence is very low. Compared to usual care, alternative models of care may have little or no effect on the health-related quality of life of ACF residents (MD -0.016, 95% CI -0.036 to 0.004; I² = 23%; 12 studies, 4016 participants; low-certainty evidence) and probably make little or no difference to the number of deaths in residents of ACFs (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.16, 24 trials, 3881 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). We did not pool the cost-effectiveness or cost data as the specific costs associated with the various alternative models of care were incomparable, both across models of care as well as across settings. Based on the findings of five economic evaluations (all interventions focused on co-ordination of care), we are uncertain of the cost-effectiveness of alternative models of care compared to usual care as the certainty of the evidence is very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to usual care, alternative models of care may make little or no difference to the number of emergency department visits but may reduce unplanned hospital admissions. We are uncertain of the effect of alternative care models on adverse events (i.e. falls, pressure ulcers, infections) and adherence to guidelines compared to usual care, as the certainty of the evidence is very low. Alternative models of care may have little or no effect on health-related quality of life and probably have no effect on mortality of ACF residents compared to usual care. Importantly, we are uncertain of the cost-effectiveness of alternative models of care due to the limited, disparate data available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polina Putrik
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liesl Grobler
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aislinn Lalor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Ramsay
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexandra Gorelik
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Deborah Parker
- Faculty of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Morgan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Denise O'Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meulenbroeks I, Raban MZ, Seaman K, Westbrook J. Therapy-based allied health delivery in residential aged care, trends, factors, and outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:712. [PMID: 36031624 PMCID: PMC9420184 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03386-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allied health professionals in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) make important contributions to the physical and mental wellbeing of residents. Yet to date, health services research in RACFs has focused almost exclusively on nursing disciplines. This review aims to synthesise the current evidence on allied health services in RACF; specifically, how therapy-based allied health is delivered, what factors impact the quantity delivered, and the impact of services on resident outcomes and care quality. Methods Empirical peer-reviewed and grey literature focusing on allied health service delivery in RACFs from the past decade was identified through systematic searches of four databases and over 200 targeted website searches. Information on how allied health delivered, factors impacting service delivery, and impact on resident outcomes were extracted. The quality of included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and the AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklist. Results Twenty-eight unique studies were included in this review; 26 peer-reviewed and two grey literature studies. Sixteen studies discussed occupational therapy and 15 discussed physiotherapy, less commonly studied professional groups included dieticians (n = 9), allied health assistants (n = 9), and social workers (n = 6). Thirteen studies were assigned a 100% quality rating. Levels of allied health service provision were generally low and varied. Five studies examined the association between system level factors and allied health service provision, and seven studies examined facility level factors and service provision. Higher levels of allied health provision or access to allied health services, specifically physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nutrition, were associated with reduced falls with injury, improved care quality, activities of daily living scores, nutritional status, and meal satisfaction in five studies. Conclusion Evidence on how allied health is delivered in RACFs, and its impact on resident health outcomes, is lacking globally. While there are some indications of positive associations between allied health staffing and resident outcomes and experiences, health systems and researchers will need commitment to consistent allied health data collection and health services research funding in the future to accurately determine how allied health is delivered in RACFs and its impact on resident wellbeing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03386-9.
Collapse
|
4
|
Chevillard G, Mousquès J. Medically underserved areas: are primary care teams efficient at attracting and retaining general practitioners? Soc Sci Med 2021; 287:114358. [PMID: 34520939 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The geographical imbalances of General Practitioners (GPs) may affect their accessibility for populations, especially in medically underserved areas. We investigate the effect of the dramatic and recent diffusion of Primary Care Teams (PCTs), especially in medically underserved areas, in order to attract and retain GPs through an improvement of their working conditions. We analyze the evolution of GPs and young GPs density between 2004 and 2017 according to a spatial taxonomy of French living areas in 6 clusters. Based on a quasi-experimental design comparing living areas, depending on the clusters, with PCTs (treated) and without PCTs (control), we used difference-in-differences models to estimate the impact of PCT new settlements on the evolution of both attraction and retention of GPs. Our results show that PCT settlements are efficient to attract young GPs and that the magnitude of the effects depends on the living area clusters. Results call for specific policies to address geographical inequalities of GPs that consider the type of place and also, in France, for new measures to attract and retain GPs in rural fringes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Chevillard
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, 117 Bis Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
| | - Julien Mousquès
- Institute for Research and Information in Health Economics, 117 Bis Rue Manin, 75019, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Putrik P, Grobler L, Lalor A, Karnon J, Parker D, Morgan M, Buchbinder R, O'Connor D. Models for delivery and co-ordination of primary or secondary health care (or both) to older adults living in aged care facilities. Hippokratia 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Polina Putrik
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Institute; Melbourne Australia
| | - Liesl Grobler
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Institute; Melbourne Australia
| | - Aislinn Lalor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Institute; Melbourne Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- College of Medicine and Public Health; Flinders University; Adelaide Australia
| | - Deborah Parker
- Faculty of Health; The University of Technology Sydney; Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Mark Morgan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, RACGP; Bond University; Gold Coast Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology; Cabrini Institute; Melbourne Australia
| | - Denise O'Connor
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pagaiya N, Noree T, Hongthong P, Gongkulawat K, Padungson P, Setheetham D. From village health volunteers to paid care givers: the optimal mix for a multidisciplinary home health care workforce in rural Thailand. HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH 2021; 19:2. [PMID: 33407550 PMCID: PMC7789652 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-020-00542-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thailand is a rapidly aging society, which places high demand on home health care services for the elderly. The shortage of health care workforce in rural areas is a crucial obstacle to the delivery of adequate home health care services. The appropriate skill-mix between multidisciplinary health team and care givers (CGs) is an attractive solution for improving home health care services in rural Thailand. This study assessed the potential of trained CGs to provide home health care services and projected what the optimal mix for a multidisciplinary home health care team in rural Thailand would be in 2030. METHODS Eleven pilot districts in Thailand were recruited for the study. Secondary data were collected along with surveys of home health care providers. A total of 130 care managers (nurses) and 351 care givers (CG) were recruited for the survey. Workload, skill-mix potential, and acceptance of care givers were assessed in the surveys. The results from secondary data and the survey were used to project the health workforce requirements in 2030. RESULTS It is projected that in 2030 the number of elderly living in rural areas will be 7,156,700 (27% of the projected rural population). Of this, 20.3% will be home-bound, 1.1% will be bed-ridden and 1.6% will need rehabilitation. The main members of the multidisciplinary health workforce involved in home health care were nurses, doctors, and physiotherapists. The home health care services that were provided by the multidisciplinary health workforce included patient assessment, development of a care plan and case conference, home visits, and teaching and supervision of CGs. The CGs were village health volunteers trained to carry out regular home visits to patients. The CGs provided assistance with the activities of daily living, basic health services, moral support to patients and relatives, and surveillance of the home environment during home visits. CGs were well accepted by both the health professionals and the patients. Projections showed that 16,094 nurses, 1,542 doctors, 1,022 physiotherapists and 50,148 CGs will be required in 2030 to meet the needs of the dependent elderly for home health care in rural Thailand. CONCLUSION With the increased need for home health care services in the future, appropriate team work between the members of the multidisciplinary health team and the CGs in the community is the appropriate solution for likely shortages of health professional workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nonglak Pagaiya
- Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mitraphap road, Muang, 40002 Khon Kaen Thailand
| | - Thinakorn Noree
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon road, Muang, 11000 Nonthaburi Thailand
| | - Penapa Hongthong
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon road, Muang, 11000 Nonthaburi Thailand
| | - Karnwarin Gongkulawat
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon road, Muang, 11000 Nonthaburi Thailand
| | - Pagaluk Padungson
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon road, Muang, 11000 Nonthaburi Thailand
| | - Dariwan Setheetham
- Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, 123 Mitraphap road, Muang, 40002 Khon Kaen Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ayorinde AA, Williams I, Mannion R, Song F, Skrybant M, Lilford RJ, Chen YF. Publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research: a multimethod study. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Bias in the publication and reporting of research findings (referred to as publication and related bias here) poses a major threat in evidence synthesis and evidence-based decision-making. Although this bias has been well documented in clinical research, little is known about its occurrence and magnitude in health services and delivery research.
Objectives
To obtain empirical evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research; to examine current practice in detecting/mitigating this bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews; and to explore stakeholders’ perception and experiences concerning such bias.
Methods
The project included five distinct but interrelated work packages. Work package 1 was a systematic review of empirical and methodological studies. Work package 2 involved a survey (meta-epidemiological study) of randomly selected systematic reviews of health services and delivery research topics (n = 200) to evaluate current practice in the assessment of publication and outcome reporting bias during evidence synthesis. Work package 3 included four case studies to explore the applicability of statistical methods for detecting such bias in health services and delivery research. In work package 4 we followed up four cohorts of health services and delivery research studies (total n = 300) to ascertain their publication status, and examined whether publication status was associated with statistical significance or perceived ‘positivity’ of study findings. Work package 5 involved key informant interviews with diverse health services and delivery research stakeholders (n = 24), and a focus group discussion with patient and service user representatives (n = 8).
Results
We identified only four studies that set out to investigate publication and related bias in health services and delivery research in work package 1. Three of these studies focused on health informatics research and one concerned health economics. All four studies reported evidence of the existence of this bias, but had methodological weaknesses. We also identified three health services and delivery research systematic reviews in which findings were compared between published and grey/unpublished literature. These reviews found that the quality and volume of evidence and effect estimates sometimes differed significantly between published and unpublished literature. Work package 2 showed low prevalence of considering/assessing publication (43%) and outcome reporting (17%) bias in health services and delivery research systematic reviews. The prevalence was lower among reviews of associations than among reviews of interventions. The case studies in work package 3 highlighted limitations in current methods for detecting these biases due to heterogeneity and potential confounders. Follow-up of health services and delivery research cohorts in work package 4 showed positive association between publication status and having statistically significant or positive findings. Diverse views concerning publication and related bias and insights into how features of health services and delivery research might influence its occurrence were uncovered through the interviews with health services and delivery research stakeholders and focus group discussion conducted in work package 5.
Conclusions
This study provided prima facie evidence on publication and related bias in quantitative health services and delivery research. This bias does appear to exist, but its prevalence and impact may vary depending on study characteristics, such as study design, and motivation for conducting the evaluation. Emphasis on methodological novelty and focus beyond summative assessments may mitigate/lessen the risk of such bias in health services and delivery research. Methodological and epistemological diversity in health services and delivery research and changing landscape in research publication need to be considered when interpreting the evidence. Collection of further empirical evidence and exploration of optimal health services and delivery research practice are required.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052333 and CRD42016052366.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimbola A Ayorinde
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Iestyn Williams
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Russell Mannion
- Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Fujian Song
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Magdalena Skrybant
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard J Lilford
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yen-Fu Chen
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hanratty B, Craig D, Brittain K, Spilsbury K, Vines J, Wilson P. Innovation to enhance health in care homes and evaluation of tools for measuring outcomes of care: rapid evidence synthesis. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundFlexible, integrated models of service delivery are being developed to meet the changing demands of an ageing population. To underpin the spread of innovative models of care across the NHS, summaries of the current research evidence are needed. This report focuses exclusively on care homes and reviews work in four specific areas, identified as key enablers for the NHS England vanguard programme.AimTo conduct a rapid synthesis of evidence relating to enhancing health in care homes across four key areas: technology, communication and engagement, workforce and evaluation.Objectives(1) To map the published literature on the uses, benefits and challenges of technology in care homes; flexible and innovative uses of the nursing and support workforce to benefit resident care; communication and engagement between care homes, communities and health-related organisations; and approaches to the evaluation of new models of care in care homes. (2) To conduct rapid, systematic syntheses of evidence to answer the following questions. Which technologies have a positive impact on resident health and well-being? How should care homes and the NHS communicate to enhance resident, family and staff outcomes and experiences? Which measurement tools have been validated for use in UK care homes? What is the evidence that staffing levels (i.e. ratio of registered nurses and support staff to residents or different levels of support staff) influence resident outcomes?Data sourcesSearches of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) and Index to Theses. Grey literature was sought via Google™ (Mountain View, CA, USA) and websites relevant to each individual search.DesignMapping review and rapid, systematic evidence syntheses.SettingCare homes with and without nursing in high-income countries.Review methodsPublished literature was mapped to a bespoke framework, and four linked rapid critical reviews of the available evidence were undertaken using systematic methods. Data were not suitable for meta-analysis, and are presented in narrative syntheses.ResultsSeven hundred and sixty-one studies were mapped across the four topic areas, and 65 studies were included in systematic rapid reviews. This work identified a paucity of large, high-quality research studies, particularly from the UK. The key findings include the following. (1) Technology: some of the most promising interventions appear to be games that promote physical activity and enhance mental health and well-being. (2) Communication and engagement: structured communication tools have been shown to enhance communication with health services and resident outcomes in US studies. No robust evidence was identified on care home engagement with communities. (3) Evaluation: 6 of the 65 measurement tools identified had been validated for use in UK care homes, two of which provide general assessments of care. The methodological quality of all six tools was assessed as poor. (4) Workforce: joint working within and beyond the care home and initiatives that focus on staff taking on new but specific care tasks appear to be associated with enhanced outcomes. Evidence for staff taking on traditional nursing tasks without qualification is limited, but promising.LimitationsThis review was restricted to English-language publications after the year 2000. The rapid methodology has facilitated a broad review in a short time period, but the possibility of omissions and errors cannot be excluded.ConclusionsThis review provides limited evidential support for some of the innovations in the NHS vanguard programme, and identifies key issues and gaps for future research and evaluation.Future workFuture work should provide high-quality evidence, in particular experimental studies, economic evaluations and research sensitive to the UK context.Study registrationThis study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42016052933, CRD42016052933, CRD42016052937 and CRD42016052938.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Hanratty
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Katie Brittain
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - John Vines
- Northumbria School of Design, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paul Wilson
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) Greater Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Has the diffusion of primary care teams in France improved attraction and retention of general practitioners in rural areas? Health Policy 2019; 123:508-515. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
10
|
Butler M, Schultz TJ, Halligan P, Sheridan A, Kinsman L, Rotter T, Beaumier J, Kelly RG, Drennan J. Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 4:CD007019. [PMID: 31012954 PMCID: PMC6478038 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurses comprise the largest component of the health workforce worldwide and numerous models of workforce allocation and profile have been implemented. These include changes in skill mix, grade mix or qualification mix, staff-allocation models, staffing levels, nursing shifts, or nurses' work patterns. This is the first update of our review published in 2011. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this review was to explore the effect of hospital nurse-staffing models on patient and staff-related outcomes in the hospital setting, specifically to identify which staffing model(s) are associated with: 1) better outcomes for patients, 2) better staff-related outcomes, and, 3) the impact of staffing model(s) on cost outcomes. SEARCH METHODS CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases and two trials registers were searched on 22 March 2018 together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised trials, non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies and interrupted-time-series or repeated-measures studies of interventions relating to hospital nurse-staffing models. Participants were patients and nursing staff working in hospital settings. We included any objective reported measure of patient-, staff-related, or economic outcome. The most important outcomes included in this review were: nursing-staff turnover, patient mortality, patient readmissions, patient attendances at the emergency department (ED), length of stay, patients with pressure ulcers, and costs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We worked independently in pairs to extract data from each potentially relevant study and to assess risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 19 studies, 17 of which were included in the analysis and eight of which we identified for this update. We identified four types of interventions relating to hospital nurse-staffing models:- introduction of advanced or specialist nurses to the nursing workforce;- introduction of nursing assistive personnel to the hospital workforce;- primary nursing; and- staffing models.The studies were conducted in the USA, the Netherlands, UK, Australia, and Canada and included patients with cancer, asthma, diabetes and chronic illness, on medical, acute care, intensive care and long-stay psychiatric units. The risk of bias across studies was high, with limitations mainly related to blinding of patients and personnel, allocation concealment, sequence generation, and blinding of outcome assessment.The addition of advanced or specialist nurses to hospital nurse staffing may lead to little or no difference in patient mortality (3 studies, 1358 participants). It is uncertain whether this intervention reduces patient readmissions (7 studies, 2995 participants), patient attendances at the ED (6 studies, 2274 participants), length of stay (3 studies, 907 participants), number of patients with pressure ulcers (1 study, 753 participants), or costs (3 studies, 617 participants), as we assessed the evidence for these outcomes as being of very low certainty. It is uncertain whether adding nursing assistive personnel to the hospital workforce reduces costs (1 study, 6769 participants), as we assessed the evidence for this outcome to be of very low certainty. It is uncertain whether primary nursing (3 studies, > 464 participants) or staffing models (1 study, 647 participants) reduces nursing-staff turnover, or if primary nursing (2 studies, > 138 participants) reduces costs, as we assessed the evidence for these outcomes to be of very low certainty. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review should be treated with caution due to the limited amount and quality of the published research that was included. We have most confidence in our finding that the introduction of advanced or specialist nurses may lead to little or no difference in one patient outcome (i.e. mortality) with greater uncertainty about other patient outcomes (i.e. readmissions, ED attendance, length of stay and pressure ulcer rates). The evidence is of insufficient certainty to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of other types of interventions, including new nurse-staffing models and introduction of nursing assistive personnel, on patient, staff and cost outcomes. Although it has been seven years since the original review was published, the certainty of the evidence about hospital nurse staffing still remains very low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Butler
- Dublin City UniversityFaculty of Science and HealthCollins Avenue, GlasnevinDublinIrelandDublin 9
| | - Timothy J Schultz
- University of AdelaideDiscipline of NursingAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Phil Halligan
- University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health SystemsDublinIreland
| | - Ann Sheridan
- University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health SystemsDublinIreland
| | - Leigh Kinsman
- The University of Newcastle and Mid North Coast Local Health DistrictSchool of Nursing and MidwiferyPort MacquarieNew South WalesAustralia2444
| | - Thomas Rotter
- School of Nursing, Queen's UniversityHealthcare Quality Programs82‐84 Barrie StretKingston, OntarioOntarioCanadaK7L 3N6
| | - Jonathan Beaumier
- University of British ColumbiaSchool of Population and Public Health2206 East MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - Robyn Gail Kelly
- University of TasmaniaSchool of Health SciencesLocked Bag 1322NewnhamTasmaniaAustralia7250
| | - Jonathan Drennan
- Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College CorkSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and HealthCollege RoadCorkIrelandT12 AK54
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
EVANS CATHERINEJ, ISON LUCY, ELLIS‐SMITH CLARE, NICHOLSON CAROLINE, COSTA ALESSIA, OLUYASE ADEJOKEO, NAMISANGO EVE, BONE ANNAE, BRIGHTON LISAJANE, YI DEOKHEE, COMBES SARAH, BAJWAH SABRINA, GAO WEI, HARDING RICHARD, ONG PAUL, HIGGINSON IRENEJ, MADDOCKS MATTHEW. Service Delivery Models to Maximize Quality of Life for Older People at the End of Life: A Rapid Review. Milbank Q 2019; 97:113-175. [PMID: 30883956 PMCID: PMC6422603 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Policy Points We identified two overarching classifications of integrated geriatric and palliative care to maximize older people's quality of life at the end of life. Both are oriented to person-centered care, but with differing emphasis on either function or symptoms and concerns. Policymakers should both improve access to palliative care beyond just the last months of life and increase geriatric care provision to maintain and optimize function. This would ensure that continuity and coordination for potentially complex care needs across the continuum of late life would be maintained, where the demarcation of boundaries between healthy aging and healthy dying become increasingly blurred. Our findings highlight the urgent need for health system change to improve end-of-life care as part of universal health coverage. The use of health services should be informed by the likelihood of benefits and intended outcomes rather than on prognosis. CONTEXT In an era of unprecedented global aging, a key priority is to align health and social services for older populations in order to support the dual priorities of living well while adapting to a gradual decline in function. We aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence regarding service delivery models that optimize the quality of life (QoL) for older people at the end of life across health, social, and welfare services worldwide. METHODS We conducted a rapid scoping review of systematic reviews. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CDSR databases from 2000 to 2017 for reviews reporting the effectiveness of service models aimed at optimizing QoL for older people, more than 50% of whom were older than 60 and in the last one or two years of life. We assessed the quality of these included reviews using AMSTAR and synthesized the findings narratively. RESULTS Of the 2,238 reviews identified, we included 72, with 20 reporting meta-analysis. Although all the World Health Organization (WHO) regions were represented, most of the reviews reported data from the Americas (52 of 72), Europe (46 of 72), and/or the Western Pacific (28 of 72). We identified two overarching classifications of service models but with different target outcomes: Integrated Geriatric Care, emphasizing physical function, and Integrated Palliative Care, focusing mainly on symptoms and concerns. Areas of synergy across the overarching classifications included person-centered care, education, and a multiprofessional workforce. The reviews assessed 117 separate outcomes. A meta-analysis demonstrated effectiveness for both classifications on QoL, including symptoms such as pain, depression, and psychological well-being. Economic analysis and its implications were poorly considered. CONCLUSIONS Despite their different target outcomes, those service models classified as Integrated Geriatric Care or Integrated Palliative Care were effective in improving QoL for older people nearing the end of life. Both approaches highlight the imperative for integrating services across the care continuum, with service involvement triggered by the patient's needs and likelihood of benefits. To inform the sustainability of health system change we encourage economic analyses that span health and social care and examine all sources of finance to understand contextual inequalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CATHERINE J. EVANS
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustBrighton General Hospital
| | - LUCY ISON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - CLARE ELLIS‐SMITH
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - CAROLINE NICHOLSON
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
- St Christopher's Hospice
| | - ALESSIA COSTA
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
| | - ADEJOKE O. OLUYASE
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - EVE NAMISANGO
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - ANNA E. BONE
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - LISA JANE BRIGHTON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - DEOKHEE YI
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - SARAH COMBES
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of NursingMidwifery & Palliative Care
| | - SABRINA BAJWAH
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - WEI GAO
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - RICHARD HARDING
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - PAUL ONG
- World Health Organisation Centre for Health Development
| | - IRENE J. HIGGINSON
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| | - MATTHEW MADDOCKS
- King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative CarePolicy and Rehabilitation
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Joyce P, Moore ZEH, Christie J. Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 12:CD012132. [PMID: 30536917 PMCID: PMC6516850 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012132.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pressure ulcers, which are a localised injury to the skin, or underlying tissue, or both, occur when people are unable to reposition themselves to relieve pressure on bony prominences. Pressure ulcers are often difficult to heal, painful, expensive to manage and have a negative impact on quality of life. While individual patient safety and quality care stem largely from direct healthcare practitioner-patient interactions, each practitioner-patient wound-care contact may be constrained or enhanced by healthcare organisation of services. Research is needed to demonstrate clearly the effect of different provider-orientated approaches to pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of different provider-orientated interventions targeted at the organisation of health services, on the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers. SEARCH METHODS In April 2018 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched three clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs, non-RCTs, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series, which enrolled people at risk of, or people with existing pressure ulcers, were eligible for inclusion in the review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment, data extraction and GRADE assessment of the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS The search yielded a total of 3172 citations and, following screening and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we deemed four studies eligible for inclusion. These studies reported the primary outcome of pressure ulcer incidence or pressure ulcer healing, or both.One controlled before-and-after study explored the impact of transmural care (a care model that provided activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care), among 62 participants with spinal cord injury. It is unclear whether transmural care leads to a difference in pressure ulcer incidence compared with usual care (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 1.64; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision).One RCT explored the impact of hospital-in-the-home care, among 100 older adults. It is unclear whether hospital-in-the-home care leads to a difference in pressure ulcer incidence risk compared with hospital admission (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.98; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision).A third study (cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial), explored the impact of being cared for by enhanced multidisciplinary teams (EMDT), among 161 long-term-care residents. The analyses of the primary outcome used measurements of 201 pressure ulcers from 119 residents. It is unclear if EMDT reduces the pressure ulcer incidence rate compared with usual care (hazard ratio (HR) 1.12, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.68; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision). It is unclear whether there is a difference in the number of wounds healed (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.87; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision). It is unclear whether there is a difference in the reduction in surface area, with and without EMDT, (healing rate 1.006; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision). It is unclear if EMDT leads to a difference in time to complete healing (HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.78, very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision).The final study (quasi-experimental cluster trial), explored the impact of multidisciplinary wound care among 176 nursing home residents. It is unclear whether there is a difference in the number of pressure ulcers healed between multidisciplinary care, or usual care (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.42; very low-certainty evidence, downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision). It is unclear if this type of care leads to a difference in time to complete healing compared with usual care (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.50; very low-certainty evidence; downgraded twice for very serious study limitations and twice for very serious imprecision).In all studies the certainty of the evidence is very low due to high risk of bias and imprecision. We downgraded the evidence due to study limitations, which included selection and attrition bias, and sample size. Secondary outcomes, such as adverse events were not reported in all studies. Where they were reported it was unclear if there was a difference as the certainty of evidence was very low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence for the impact of organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers remains unclear. Overall, GRADE assessments of the evidence resulted in judgements of very low-certainty evidence. The studies were at high risk of bias, and outcome measures were imprecise due to wide confidence intervals and small sample sizes, meaning that additional research is required to confirm these results. The secondary outcomes reported varied across the studies and some were not reported. We judged the evidence from those that were reported (including adverse events), to be of very low certainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Joyce
- Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandSchool of Medicine121 St. Stephens GreenDublinIreland2
| | - Zena EH Moore
- Royal College of Surgeons in IrelandSchool of Nursing & Midwifery123 St. Stephen's GreenDublinIrelandD2
| | - Janice Christie
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & HealthOxford RoadManchesterLancashireUKM13 9PL
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cousins JM, Bereznicki LR, Cooling NB, Peterson GM. Prescribing of psychotropic medication for nursing home residents with dementia: a general practitioner survey. Clin Interv Aging 2017; 12:1573-1578. [PMID: 29042758 PMCID: PMC5633272 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s146613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the prescribing of psychotropic medication by general practitioners (GPs) to nursing home residents with dementia. Subjects and methods GPs with experience in nursing homes were recruited through professional body newsletter advertising, while 1,000 randomly selected GPs from southeastern Australia were invited to participate, along with a targeted group of GPs in Tasmania. An anonymous survey was used to collect GPs’ opinions. Results A lack of nursing staff and resources was cited as the major barrier to GPs recommending non-pharmacological techniques for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD; cited by 55%; 78/141), and increasing staff levels at the nursing home ranked as the most important factor to reduce the usage of psychotropic agents (cited by 60%; 76/126). Conclusion According to GPs, strategies to reduce the reliance on psychotropic medication by nursing home residents should be directed toward improved staffing and resources at the facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M Cousins
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Luke Re Bereznicki
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Nick B Cooling
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Gregory M Peterson
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Joyce P, Moore ZEH, Christie J, Dumville JC. Organisation of health services for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2016. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Joyce
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; School of Medicine; 121 St. Stephens Green Dublin Ireland 2
| | - Zena EH Moore
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; School of Nursing & Midwifery; 123 St. Stephen's Green Dublin Ireland D2
| | - Janice Christie
- University of Manchester; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work; Oxford Road Manchester Lancashire UK M13 9PL
| | - Jo C Dumville
- University of Manchester; School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work; Oxford Road Manchester Lancashire UK M13 9PL
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Das JK, Kumar R, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA. Evidence from facility level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: interventions and findings. Reprod Health 2014; 11 Suppl 2:S4. [PMID: 25208539 PMCID: PMC4160922 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-s2-s4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Most of the maternal and newborn deaths occur at birth or within 24 hours of birth. Therefore, essential lifesaving interventions need to be delivered at basic or comprehensive emergency obstetric care facilities. Facilities provide complex interventions including advice on referrals, post discharge care, long-term management of chronic conditions along with staff training, managerial and administrative support to other facilities. This paper reviews the effectiveness of facility level inputs for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. We considered all available systematic reviews published before May 2013 on the pre-defined facility level interventions and included 32 systematic reviews. Findings suggest that additional social support during pregnancy and labour significantly decreased the risk of antenatal hospital admission, intrapartum analgesia, dissatisfaction, labour duration, cesarean delivery and instrumental vaginal birth. However, it did not have any impact on pregnancy outcomes. Continued midwifery care from early pregnancy to postpartum period was associated with reduced medical procedures during labour and shorter length of stay. Facility based stress training and management interventions to maintain well performing and motivated workforce, significantly reduced job stress and improved job satisfaction while the interventions tailored to address identified barriers to change improved the desired practice. We found limited and inconclusive evidence for the impacts of physical environment, exit interviews and organizational culture modifications. At the facility level, specialized midwifery teams and social support during pregnancy and labour have demonstrated conclusive benefits in improving maternal newborn health outcomes. However, the generalizability of these findings is limited to high income countries. Future programs in resource limited settings should utilize these findings to implement relevant interventions tailored to their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai K Das
- Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Rohail Kumar
- Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Rehana A Salam
- Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zohra S Lassi
- Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Division of Women & Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
- Program for Global Pediatric Research, Hospital For Sick Children, Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rosati S, Montanaro A, Tralli A, Balestra G. Fuzzy logic applied to a Patient Classification System. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2013; 2013:1310-1313. [PMID: 24109936 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2013.6609749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The optimization of the clinical staff resources is a very complicated task that can be supported by a set of tools called Patient Classification Systems (PCS). These methods allow the evaluation of the correct number of nurses and healthcare workers needed in order to guarantee an appropriate care level.
Collapse
|