Internal fixation and comparisons of different fixation methods for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Geometric semi-automatic analysis of radiographs of Colles' fractures

Fractures of the wrist are common in Emergency Departments, where some patients are treated with a procedure called Manipulation under Anaesthesia. In some cases, this procedure is unsuccessful and patients need to revisit the hospital where they undergo surgery to treat the fracture. This work describes a geometric semi-automatic image analysis algorithm to analyse and compare the x-rays of healthy controls and patients with dorsally displaced wrist fractures (Colles' fractures) who were treated with Manipulation under Anaesthesia. A series of 161 posterior-anterior radiographs from healthy controls and patients with Colles' fractures were acquired and analysed. The patients' group was further subdivided according to the outcome of the procedure (successful/unsuccessful) and pre- or post-intervention creating five groups in total (healthy, pre-successful, pre-unsuccessful, post-successful, post-unsuccessful). The semi-automatic analysis consisted of manual location of three landmarks (finger, lunate and radial styloid) and automatic processing to generate 32 geometric and texture measurements, which may be related to conditions such as osteoporosis and swelling of the wrist. Statistical differences were found between patients and controls, as well as between pre- and post-intervention, but not between the procedures. The most distinct measurements were those of texture. Although the study includes a relatively low number of cases and measurements, the statistical differences are encouraging.

Registration and Outcome-Reporting Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials of Distal Radial Fracture Treatment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to systematically evaluate the completeness of trial registration and the extent of outcome-reporting bias in modern randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to the treatment of distal radial fracture.

METHODS

With use of 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and PEDro), this systematic review identified all RCTs of distal radial fracture treatment published from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. We independently determined the registration status of these trials in a public trial registry and compared the characteristics of registered and non-registered trials. We assessed the quality and consistency of primary outcome measure (POM) reporting between the registration data and the final published studies.

RESULTS

Ninety studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, only 28 (31%) were registered, and only 3 (3%) were "appropriately registered" (i.e., prospectively registered and identifying and fully describing the POM). Registered trials had larger sample sizes and were more likely to be multicenter, to report funding sources, and to be published in higher-impact-factor journals. Sixteen (18%) of the 90 registered RCTs named a POM in the registry; 7 (44%) of those 16 registered RCTs stated a different POM, an additional POM, or no POM at all in the final publication than was stated in the registry data. Additionally, 13 (81%) of those 16 registered RCTs had discrepancies in the time point reported for the POM.

CONCLUSIONS

In an attempt to address publication and outcome-reporting bias, prospective trial registration in a public registry has been deemed a condition for publication by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) since 2005. This study shows poor registration rates as well as inconsistencies in the reporting of POMs of recent trials relating to the treatment of distal radial fracture, one of the most common and most investigated injuries in orthopaedic practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The problems of registration and outcome-reporting bias in RCTs are important to highlight and address, and to find a solution will require the cooperation of researchers, reviewers, and journal editors. Increasing the transparency and consistency of reporting will help to increase the quality of research, which can impact patient care through evidence-based guidelines.

Graded motor imagery for women at risk for developing type I CRPS following closed treatment of distal radius fractures: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fractures (DRF) account for nearly one-fifth of all fractures in older adults, and women experience them 5× as often as men. Most DRF occur with low impact injuries to the wrist with an outstretched hand, and are often managed via closed treatment and cast immobilization. Women sustaining a DRF are at risk for upper limb immobility, sensorimotor changes, edema and type I complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Since CRPS onset is likely influenced by alterations in the brain's somatosensory region, a rehabilitation intervention, Graded Motor Imagery (GMI), aims to restore cortical representation, including sensory and motor function, of the affected limb. To date, there are no studies on the use of GMI in reducing risk of or preventing the onset of type I CRPS in women with DRF treated with cast immobilization. Due to a higher likelihood of women with this injury developing type I CRPS, it is important to early intervention is needed.

METHODS/DESIGN

This article describes a six-week randomized comparative effectiveness trial, where the outcomes of a modified GMI program (mGMI) + standard of care (SOC) group (n = 33) are compared to a SOC only control group (n = 33). Immediately following cast immobilization, both groups participate in four 1-h clinic-based sessions, and a home program for 10 min three times daily until cast removal. Blinded assessments occur within 1 week of cast immobilization (baseline), at three weeks post cast immbolization, cast removal, and at three months post cast removal. The primary outcomes are patient reported wrist/hand function and symptomology on the Patient Rated Wristand Hand Evaluation, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Budapest CRPS Criteria. The secondary outcomes are grip strength, active range of motion as per goniometry, circumferential edema measurements, and joint position sense.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate the early effects of mGMI + SOC hand therapy compared to SOC alone. We intend to investigate whether an intervention, specifically mGMI, used to treat preexisiting pain and motor dysfunction might also be used to mitigate these problems prior to their onset. If positive effects are observed, mGMI + SOC may be considered for incorporation into early rehabilitation program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT02957240 (Approval date: April 20, 2017).

Results of geriatric distal radius fractures treated by intramedullary fixation

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fracture are common injuries but no gold standard for their therapy exists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of fracture care in distal radius fractures using an intramedullary implant (Targon DR interlocking nail). The nail had been developed to minimize the surgical exposure, increase fixation strength, to prevent tendon irritations and to allow for a fast return to activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective study reports the result of 43 patients with an age over 70 years (range 70-91 years) treated by closed reduction and intramedullary fixation. Inclusion criteria were displaced unilateral isolated AO A or C type fractures. The Targon DR interlocking nail was used for all patients. The minimum follow up was 12 months.

RESULTS

All fractures united within 2 months. At one-year follow-up the patients had a mean extension of 96.1 ± 1.5%, flexion of 91.6 ± 3.3%, pronation of 99.4 ± 0.7%, supination of 94.0 ± 2.0%, radial abduction of 98.1 ± 1.3%, ulnar deviation of 91.4 ± 3.0% and a grip strength of 91.5 ± 4.3% compared to the contralateral wrist. Pain score measured by a Visual Analogue Scale scored 0.0 ± 0.0 at rest and in activity 0.3 ± 0.3. The mean Castaing Score was good (1.06 ± 0.30) and the Gartland & Werley Score was excellent (1.50 ± 0.57). The mean radial shortening was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm and radial inclination was 3.1 ± 1.1° (range +15° to 0°). No deep soft-tissue or chronic osseous infections were observed. One patient developed a carpal tunnel syndrome. Paraesthesia or dysaesthesia of the superficial radial nerve was registered in seven patients and fully recovered in four patients. There were two cases of single screw loosening. We also found two cases of screw overlength and consecutive contact with the ulnar head, one patient underwent implant removal. Another patient developed CRPS (2.3%). We did not observe any case of hardware failure, tendon irritation or tendon rupture.

CONCLUSION

In geriatric patients intramedullary interlocking nailing of displaced extraarticular or intraarticular distal radius fracture with the Targon DR nail represents a viable treatment option and alternative to the use of volar interlocking plating in terms of fracture reduction, maintenance of reduction and functional outcome.

Complications of Distal Radius Fixation

Complications following any form of distal radius fixation remain prevalent. With an armamentarium of fixation options available to practicing surgeons, familiarity with the risks of newer plate technology as it compares with other conventional methods is crucial to optimizing surgical outcome and managing patient expectations. This article presents an updated review on complications following various forms of distal radius fixation.

Evidence-based medicine in hand surgery: clinical applications and future direction

Evidence-based medicine empowers physicians to systematically analyze published data so as to quickly formulate treatment plans that deliver safe, robust, and cost-effective patient care. In this article, we sample some areas in hand and upper extremity surgery where the evidence base is strong enough that it has or should have unified treatment strategies; we identify some problems where good evidence has failed to unify treatment, and discuss problems for which evidence is still lacking but needed because treatment remains controversial. We also discuss circumstances in which level 4 evidence is more likely than randomized trials to guide treatment.

A descriptive study on wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment and function following distal radius fracture intervention

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional design.

INTRODUCTION

Wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment have been observed after distal radius fracture (DRF) treatment. This impairment and its relationship to function lack research.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The primary aim of this exploratory study was to determine the magnitude of wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment following surgical and non-surgical treatment among older patients following DRF. Secondary aims were to determine the relationship between wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment with function and pain as well as the relationships among wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment and function and age following DRF.

METHODS

Ten Test (TT), active joint position sense (JPS), electromyography (EMG), computerized hand-grip dynamometer (CHD), and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) were used to assess twenty-four female participants 8 weeks following DRF treatment and their 24 matched-control healthy counterparts on wrist and hand sensibility, proprioception, muscle recruitment, grip force, muscle fatigue, and functional status.

RESULTS

Participants following DRF demonstrated significantly (p < .05) greater sensory (i.e., JPS, TT), and motor (i.e., EMG, CHD) deficits than their control counterparts. A significantly higher functional deficit (i.e., PRWE) also existed among participants following DRF than the control group. Participants following surgical and non-surgical DRF treatment were found to be statistically different only on total grip force. Group differences on JPS and total grip force revealed the strongest effect size with the highest correlations to PRWE. EMG and muscle fatigue ratio group differences revealed a weaker effect size with a fair degree of correlation to PRWE. Pain significantly correlated with sensori-motor function. Age did not correlate with any measured variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant wrist and hand sensori-motor impairment and functional deficits among older females 8 weeks following DRF surgical and non-surgical interventions were revealed. JPS and total grip force were the most clinically meaningful tests for assessing the sensori-motor status as well as explaining functional disability and pain levels for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c.

Reflections 1 year into the 21-Center National Institutes of Health--funded WRIST study: a primer on conducting a multicenter clinical trial

The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgery Trial (WRIST) study group is a collaboration of 21 hand surgery centers in the United States, Canada, and Singapore, to showcase the interest and capability of hand surgeons to conduct a multicenter clinical trial. The WRIST study group was formed in response to the seminal systematic review by Margaliot et al and the Cochrane report that indicated marked deficiency in the quality of evidence in the distal radius fracture literature. Since the initial description of this fracture by Colles in 1814, over 2,000 studies have been published on this subject; yet, high-level studies based on the principles of evidence-based medicine are lacking. As we continue to embrace evidence-based medicine to raise the quality of research, the lessons learned during the organization and conduct of WRIST can serve as a template for others contemplating similar efforts. This article traces the course of WRIST by sharing the triumphs and, more important, the struggles faced in the first year of this study.

Treatment of distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

In light of the Norwegian Orthopaedic Association's wish to prepare guidelines for treatment of distal radius fractures, we have reviewed the knowledge base for the provision of such treatment.

METHOD

The paper is based on systematic reviews of treatment of distal radius fractures from literature search in the following databases: the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE Cochrane), the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, PreMedline, Medline and Embase.

RESULTS

There is evidence for recommending percutaneous pinning of unstable, dorsally displaced distal radius fractures rather than conservative treatment, but which pinning method is best remains uncertain. There is also documentation to support the use of external fixation rather than conservative treatment. There is insufficient documentation available to draw conclusions regarding the relative efficacy of the various methods of external fixation, but external fixation in combination with adjuvant pinning of the fracture fragment enhances the result compared to external fixation alone. The evidence indicates that plates may enhance functional short-term results for unstable distal radius fractures compared to external fixation.

INTERPRETATION

There is evidence in support of differentiated treatment of distal radius fractures. However, many questions remain unanswered, and good prospective, randomised multi-centre trials are needed.

Distal radius fractures: current concepts

Despite the frequency of distal radius fractures, the optimal treatment remains without consensus opinion. A trend toward increased distal radius fracture open reduction and internal fixation has been identified, with biomechanical and clinical studies suggesting treatment advantages of certain fixation methods over others. Well-controlled patient trials are still missing to lend objective findings to management algorithms. This article reviews the literature over the past 5 years to guide our management regarding this common upper-extremity injury.

Management of distal radius fractures from the North American perspective

In North America, the rate of nonoperative management of displaced distal radius fractures has declined as the rate of internal fixation has increased. Volar locking plate fixation has increased in popularity despite a lack of supportive level 1 evidence. Issues of cost-effectiveness are relevant because there is no best-practice treatment at this stage. Clinicians should be aware of the goals of treatment and challenges, particularly in managing elderly patients with distal radius fractures. Large, randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses may provide answers about when operative intervention is favored over nonoperative management and which operative intervention provides the best outcomes.

Treatment of unstable distal radius fractures with Ilizarov circular, nonbridging external fixator

Unstable distal radius fractures remain a challenge for the treating orthopaedic surgeon. We present a retrospective follow-up study (mean follow-up 12.5 months) of 20 patients with 21 unstable distal radius fractures that were reduced in a closed manner and stabilized with a nonbridging Ilizarov external fixator. Subsequent insertion of olive wires for interfragmentary compression was performed in cases with intra-articular fractures. According to the overall evaluation proposed by Gartland and Werley scoring system 12 wrists were classified as excellent, 6 as good, 2 as fair and 1 as poor. Grade II pin-tract infection in distal fracture fragment was detected in 3 wires from a total of 78 (3.8%) and in 4 half pins out of a total of 9 (44.4%). Pronation was the most frequently impaired movement. This was restricted in 4 patients (19%) in whom a radioulnar transfixing wire was applied. Symptoms of irritation of superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve occurred in 3 patients with an olive wire applied in a closed manner in the distal fragment. Ilizarov method yields functional results comparable to that of other methods whilst it avoids wrist immobilization, open reduction and reoperation for implant removal. The method is associated with a low rate of major complication and satisfactory functional outcome.

Relationship between patient satisfaction and objective functional outcome after surgical treatment for distal radius fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

INTRODUCTION

Patient satisfaction is increasingly used as a metric of health care outcomes. The relationship between patient satisfaction and functional outcomes metrics is understudied.

PURPOSE

To determine the minimum recovery needed in grip strength, key pinch strength, and arc of motion needed for patient satisfaction after treatment of distal radius fracture (DRF) with volar locking plating system placement.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 125 DRF patients was evaluated three months after surgery for grip strength, key pinch strength, wrist arc of motion, and satisfaction with hand strength and wrist arc of motion. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed using patient satisfaction items as the "gold standard" and each functional measure of outcome as a predictor.

RESULTS

We found that the optimal cutpoints to distinguish satisfaction from dissatisfaction occurred when patients had recovered 65% of their grip strength, 87% of their key grip strength, and 95% of the wrist arc of motion, as measured as percents of their uninjured wrists.

CONCLUSIONS

A much greater wrist range of motion must be recovered for patients to be satisfied than what is needed to perform activities of daily living.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnosis level 2.