1
|
de Boer AG, Tamminga SJ, Boschman JS, Hoving JL. Non-medical interventions to enhance return to work for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD007569. [PMID: 38441440 PMCID: PMC10913845 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007569.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with cancer are 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than people without a cancer diagnosis. Therefore, it is important to investigate whether programmes to enhance the return-to-work (RTW) process for people who have been diagnosed with cancer are effective. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011 and updated in 2015. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of non-medical interventions aimed at enhancing return to work (RTW) in people with cancer compared to alternative programmes including usual care or no intervention. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and three trial registers up to 18 August 2021. We also examined the reference lists of included studies and selected reviews, and contacted authors of relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs on the effectiveness of psycho-educational, vocational, physical or multidisciplinary interventions enhancing RTW in people with cancer. The primary outcome was RTW measured as either RTW rate or sick leave duration measured at 12 months' follow-up. The secondary outcome was quality of life (QoL). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data and rated certainty of the evidence using GRADE. We pooled study results judged to be clinically homogeneous in different comparisons reporting risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for RTW and mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% CIs for QoL. MAIN RESULTS We included 15 RCTs involving 1477 people with cancer with 19 evaluations because of multiple treatment groups. In this update, we added eight new RCTs and excluded seven RCTs from the previous versions of this review that were aimed at medical interventions. All included RCTs were conducted in high-income countries, and most were aimed at people with breast cancer (nine RCTs) or prostate cancer (two RCTs). Risk of bias We judged nine RCTs at low risk of bias and six at high risk of bias. The most common type of bias was a lack of blinding (9/15 RCTs). Psycho-educational interventions We found four RCTs comparing psycho-educational interventions including patient education and patient counselling versus care as usual. Psycho-educational interventions probably result in little to no difference in RTW compared to care as usual (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24; 4 RCTs, 512 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This means that in the intervention and control groups, approximately 625 per 1000 participants may have returned to work. The psycho-educational interventions may result in little to no difference in QoL compared to care as usual (MD 1.47, 95% CI -2.38 to 5.32; 1 RCT, 124 participants; low-certainty evidence). Vocational interventions We found one RCT comparing vocational intervention versus care as usual. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of a vocational intervention on RTW compared to care as usual (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 34 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study did not report QoL. Physical interventions Four RCTs compared a physical intervention programme versus care as usual. These physical intervention programmes included walking, yoga or physical exercise. Physical interventions likely increase RTW compared to care as usual (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.39; 4 RCTs, 434 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This means that in the intervention group probably 677 to 871 per 1000 participants RTW compared to 627 per 1000 in the control group (thus, 50 to 244 participants more RTW). Physical interventions may result in little to no difference in QoL compared to care as usual (SMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.32; 1 RCT, 173 participants; low-certainty evidence). The SMD translates back to a 1.8-point difference (95% CI -7.54 to 3.97) on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Multidisciplinary interventions Six RCTs compared multidisciplinary interventions (vocational counselling, patient education, patient counselling, physical exercises) to care as usual. Multidisciplinary interventions likely increase RTW compared to care as usual (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.33; 6 RCTs, 497 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This means that in the intervention group probably 694 to 844 per 1000 participants RTW compared to 625 per 1000 in the control group (thus, 69 to 217 participants more RTW). Multidisciplinary interventions may result in little to no difference in QoL compared to care as usual (SMD 0.07, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.28; 3 RCTs, 378 participants; low-certainty evidence). The SMD translates back to a 1.4-point difference (95% CI -2.58 to 5.36) on the EORTC QLQ-C30. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Physical interventions (four RCTs) and multidisciplinary interventions (six RCTs) likely increase RTW of people with cancer. Psycho-educational interventions (four RCTs) probably result in little to no difference in RTW, while the evidence from vocational interventions (one RCT) is very uncertain. Psycho-educational, physical or multidisciplinary interventions may result in little to no difference in QoL. Future research on enhancing RTW in people with cancer involving multidisciplinary interventions encompassing a physical, psycho-educational and vocational component is needed, and be preferably tailored to the needs of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Gem de Boer
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sietske J Tamminga
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Julitta S Boschman
- Cochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan L Hoving
- Cochrane Work, Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhu P, Zhang H, Wang W, Gu X, Ding Y, Qian M, Shi G. The challenges of returning to work for differentiated thyroid cancer survivors in china: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:582. [PMID: 37728637 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although thyroid cancer survivors have a good prognosis and the survival rate of differentiated thyroid cancer is close to 100%, treatment and its side effects seriously affect the quality of life of patients, especially rehabilitation at work. The purpose of this study was to explore the challenges faced by differentiated thyroid cancer survivors in returning to work and maintaining employment. METHODS A purposive sample of differentiated thyroid cancer patients who had undergone surgical treatment and were followed up at the outpatient departments of thyroid surgery wards of two tertiary care hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China, between January and March 2023, were subjected to semi-structured interviews. An inductive content analysis was conducted to identify themes. RESULTS A total of 27 participants, aged 23-56 years, were interviewed. Three themes and eight subthemes were identified: pressure perception including social pressure in the workplace, regular appointments conflict with work schedules, and dilemma of career development; the challenges of self-adjustment including physical disorder, unable to adapt to the pace of work, and unstable mood affects working condition; and lack of social support including lack of access to information or support groups, lack of sympathy and understanding from employers, and lack of professional support. CONCLUSIONS Our study identified that our participants with differentiated thyroid cancer patients face challenges in trying to return to work or maintain employment within the confines of their disease. Multilevel interventions, ranging from employer and co-worker understanding to information, psychological and other support from health care professionals, can facilitate the process of returning to work and help patients reconcile illness and work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pingting Zhu
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China.
| | - Hui Zhang
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wen Wang
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xinyue Gu
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yinwen Ding
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Meiyan Qian
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Guanghui Shi
- School of Nursing, Yangzhou University, Hanjiang County,136 Jiangyang Middle Road, Yangzhou, 225009, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bilodeau K, Gouin MM, Lecours A, Lederer V, Durand MJ, Kilpatrick K, Lepage D, Ladouceur-Deslauriers L, Dorta T. Co-design of a return-to-work intervention after breast cancer treatments: feasibility study protocol (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e37009. [PMID: 35451972 PMCID: PMC9077508 DOI: 10.2196/37009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The mortality rate from breast cancer has been declining for many years, and the population size of working-age survivors is steadily increasing. However, the recurrent side effects of cancer and its treatment can result in multiple disabilities and disruptions to day-to-day life, including work disruptions. Despite the existing knowledge of best practices regarding return to work (RTW) for breast cancer survivors, only a few interdisciplinary interventions have been developed to address the individualized needs and multiple challenges of breast cancer survivors, health care professionals, and employer and insurer representatives. Thus, it seems appropriate to develop RTW interventions collaboratively by using a co-design approach with these specific stakeholders. Objective This paper presents a protocol for developing and testing an innovative, interdisciplinary pilot intervention based on a co-design approach to better support RTW and job retention after breast cancer treatment. Methods First, a participatory research approach will be used to develop the intervention in a co-design workshop with 12 to 20 participants, including people affected by cancer, employer and insurer representatives, and health care professionals. Next, a pilot intervention will be tested in a primary care setting with 6 to 8 women affected by breast cancer. The acceptability and feasibility of the pilot intervention will be pretested through semistructured interviews with participants, health care professionals, and involved patient partners. The transcribed data will undergo an iterative content analysis. Results The first phase of the project—the co-design workshop—was completed in June 2021. The pilot test of the intervention will begin in spring 2022. The results from the test will be available in late 2022. Conclusions The project will offer novel data regarding the use of the co-design approach for the development of innovative, co-designed interventions. In addition, it will be possible to document the acceptability and feasibility of the pilot intervention with a primary care team. Depending on the results obtained, the intervention could be implemented on a larger scale. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/37009
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Bilodeau
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Michelle Gouin
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
| | - Alexandra Lecours
- Département de relations industrielles, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Valérie Lederer
- Département de relations industrielles, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-José Durand
- Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, University of Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada
| | - Kelley Kilpatrick
- Centre de recherche Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Ingram School of Nursing, Mcgill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - David Lepage
- Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Est de l'île de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Tomas Dorta
- Faculté de l'aménagement, École de Design, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
León-Salas B, Zabaleta-Del-Olmo E, Llobera J, Bolíbar-Ribas B, López-Jiménez T, Casajuana-Closas M, Esteva M. Health status, lifestyle habits, and perceived social support in long-term cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13:376. [PMID: 32771042 PMCID: PMC7414741 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-020-05218-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the presence of comorbidities and self-perceived health and social support between long-term cancer survivors and people without a history of cancer from a clinical trial examining the effects of a multiple risk behavior intervention. RESULTS Of the 4259 people studied, 190 (4.46%) were cancer survivors. They had a mean ± SD age of 62.8 ± 7 years vs. 58.7 ± 8 years (P < 0.01) for non-cancer people and were more likely to be on long-term sick leave (11.9 vs. 3.5%, P < 0.001). No differences were observed for smoking, adherence to the Mediterranean diet, physical activity, obesity, or social support. Cancer survivors were more likely to have worse self-perceived health (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.02-2.75), more comorbidities (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.18-2.39), COPD (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25-3.78), and depression (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.06-2.57). Older age and worse self-perceived health were independent predictors of survivorship in the adjusted analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatriz León-Salas
- Canarian Foundation in Health Care Research (FUNCANIS), Camino Candelaria, 44. CS San Isidro-El Chorrillo, 38109, El Rosario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.,Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,Health Services Research in Chronic Diseases Network (REDISSEC), Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,University Institute for Research in Primary Care Jordi Gol I Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de Les Corts Catalanes, 587, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.,Barcelona Health District, Catalonial Health Institute, Barcelona, Spain.,Faculty of Nursing, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Joan Llobera
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,Unit of Research Majorca Department of Primary Care, Balearic Health Service, Escola Graduada 3, 07002, Palma, Majorca, Spain.,Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), University Hospital of Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, 07120, Palma, Majorca, Spain
| | - Bonaventura Bolíbar-Ribas
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,University Institute for Research in Primary Care Jordi Gol I Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de Les Corts Catalanes, 587, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Tomás López-Jiménez
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,University Institute for Research in Primary Care Jordi Gol I Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de Les Corts Catalanes, 587, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Marc Casajuana-Closas
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain.,University Institute for Research in Primary Care Jordi Gol I Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Gran Via de Les Corts Catalanes, 587, 08007, Barcelona, Spain.,Autonomous University of Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Magdalena Esteva
- Preventive Activities and Health Promotion Research Network (REDIAPP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Unit of Research Majorca Department of Primary Care, Balearic Health Service, Escola Graduada 3, 07002, Palma, Majorca, Spain. .,Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), University Hospital of Son Espases, Carretera de Valldemossa, 79, 07120, Palma, Majorca, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Egmond MP, Duijts SFA, Scholten APJ, van der Beek AJ, Anema JR. Offering a tailored return to work program to cancer survivors with job loss: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health 2016; 15:940. [PMID: 27600542 PMCID: PMC5013616 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3592-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Europe, 1.7 million persons of working age are diagnosed with cancer each year. During or after treatment, cancer survivors (CSs) are vulnerable for job loss, and many CSs struggle with return to work (RTW). When offering RTW interventions to CSs, it is important to conduct a process evaluation to assess such factors as the population reached and implementation problems. Recently, we developed an innovative RTW program, tailored specifically to the needs of CSs with job loss in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of theory and implementation failure, as well as to evaluate procedures for recruitment, execution and implementation of the tailored RTW program for CSs with job loss. METHODS Six components were evaluated in the RTW program: Recruitment, Reach, Dosage, Implementation, Satisfaction, and Experienced Barriers. Data were provided by logbooks and questionnaires from participating CSs, occupational health care (OHC) professionals, and re-integration coaches and job hunting officers who delivered the RTW program. SPSS and Excel were used to conduct the analyses. RESULTS 85 CSs received the tailored RTW program. Their mean age was 47.9 years (SD 8.5). The majority were female (72 %), married (52 %), and of Dutch nationality (91 %). The program reached 88.2 % of the target population and 52 % of participants who started the program received the adequate dosage. The program implementation score was 45.9 %. Participants' mean overall program duration remained within the protocol boundaries. Re-integration coaches were more satisfied with the program than job hunting officers or OHC professionals. Likewise, participants were more satisfied with the program delivery by the re-integration coaches than with the delivery by the job hunting officers. Reported barriers within the RTW program were a lack of communication, high program intensity and short program duration, and, with regard to the job hunting officers, a lack of experience with cancer-related RTW problems. CONCLUSIONS Participants, OHC professionals, re-integration coaches and job hunting officers generally had positive experiences with the innovative tailored RTW program. Facilitating communication between the delivering parties, and engaging usual care during program delivery, could be key elements to improved program implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register, registration number NTR3562 , registered 07-08-2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. P. van Egmond
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 – C581, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center for Insurance Medicine, AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S. F. A. Duijts
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 – C581, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. P. J. Scholten
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 – C581, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A. J. van der Beek
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 – C581, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center for Insurance Medicine, AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. R. Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7 – C581, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center for Insurance Medicine, AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoving JL, Lacaille D, Urquhart DM, Hannu TJ, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing job loss in workers with inflammatory arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD010208. [PMID: 25375291 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010208.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Work participation of patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) is important not only economically but also for physical and psychological health. There is no Cochrane Review to date on studies of non-pharmacological interventions specifically aimed at preventing job loss in people with IA. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of non-pharmacological interventions that aim to prevent job loss, work absenteeism or improve work functioning for employees with IA (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), other spondylarthritis (SpA) or IA associated with connective tissue diseases, such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)). SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases from inception up to 30 April 2014; The Cochrane Library (including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, i.e. CENTRAL and DARE), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Embase.com), CINAHL (EbSCOhost), ClinicalTrials.gov and PsycINFO (ProQuest). We did not impose language restrictions in the search. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated interventions aimed at preventing job loss in adults of working age (18 to 65 years) diagnosed with IA, including RA, AS, PsA, SpA or other types of IA. Primary outcomes were job loss and sickness absenteeism and the secondary outcome was work functioning. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias in the included RCTs. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs with a total of 414 participants at risk of job loss. The majority of participants had IA, most with RA and to a lesser degree AS. The interventions aimed to prevent job loss and improve work functioning in several ways: firstly by evaluating work changes or adaptations and secondly by providing any person-directed interventions including vocational counselling, advice or education. Interventions directly targeted at the work environment were minimal and included workplace visits (one trial) or any actions by an occupational physician (one trial). The duration or dose of the interventions varied from two 1.5-hour sessions (one RCT) over five months, two consultation and multidisciplinary treatments during three months (one RCT), to six to eight individual or group sessions over six months (also one RCT). All participants were recruited through rheumatology clinics, both in or outside hospitals. Included trials investigated job loss (n = two RCTs; 382 participants), work absenteeism and work functioning (n = one RCT; 32 participants). Overall, we evaluated the two smaller trials as having a high risk of bias and the large trial as having a low risk of bias. Trials showed marked differences in how they performed on risk of bias items, particularly on performance bias.We assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach and judged there to be very low quality evidence across the three reported outcomes. Of the two RCTs investigating job loss, the larger one (n = 242 participants) reported a large statistically significant reduction in job loss (relative risk (RR) = 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.68) and the other RCT (n = 140) reported similar effects in both groups, although the CI was very wide (RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.06). The latter one probably suffered from performance bias and we judged it to have a high risk of bias. The one small trial investigating sickness absenteeism found uncertain results at six months' follow-up (MD = -2.42 days, 95% CI -5.03 to 0.19). Finally, in the same small trial investigating work functioning using the Rheumatoid Arthritis-Work Instability Scale (RA-WIS), there was a moderate improvement of intermediate term work functioning (six months; scale range 0 to 23; mean improvement -4.67 points, 95% CI -8.43 to -0.91). We identified no adverse effects in the publications of the three trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This Cochrane review of three RCTs found very low quality evidence overall for job loss prevention interventions having an effect on job loss, work absenteeism and work functioning in workers with inflammatory arthritis. While this review highlights that further high quality RCTs are required, the results suggest that these strategies have potential to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan L Hoving
- Coronel Institute of Occupational Health and Research Center for Insurance Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1100 DE
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Désiron HAM, Donceel P, Godderis L, Van Hoof E, de Rijk A. What is the value of occupational therapy in return to work for breast cancer patients? A qualitative inquiry among experts. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2014; 24:267-80. [PMID: 24961966 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
An increasing number of patients are confronted with breast cancer (BC) and functional limitations after treatment. Occupational therapy (OT) is successful in return to work (RTW), but not yet available for BC patients. This paper explores experts' opinions on OT interventions for RTW in BC patients in the Belgian context. Primary data were topic-interviews with all heads of OT departments in Flemish University Hospitals (n = 5). Secondary data were four focus group interviews with care professionals in oncological rehabilitation (n = 41). All data were transcribed and thematic analysis was used. Integrated in multidisciplinary teamwork, OT interventions should have a holistic and client-centred approach, start early in the rehabilitation process, include workplace visits and contacts with relevant stakeholders, and use goal setting to start up tailor made rehabilitation, linking assessment of abilities and work. Occupational therapists are regarded as professionals who can effectively answer BC patients unmet needs regarding RTW due to their skill to bridge between care and workplace. According to the experts, OT interventions supporting RTW in BC patients are useful when integrated in regular healthcare. They agree on the components but organisational barriers should be removed, for example not providing reimbursement for including this type of support trough healthcare insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H A M Désiron
- Centre Environment & Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Scott DA, Mills M, Black A, Cantwell M, Campbell A, Cardwell CR, Porter S, Donnelly M. Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD007730. [PMID: 23543556 PMCID: PMC6457813 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007730.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes (MDRPs) have developed in response to the growing number of people living with and surviving cancer. MDRPs comprise a physical component and a psychosocial component. Studies of the effectiveness of these programmes have not been reviewed and synthesised. OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of studies examining the effectiveness of MDRPs in terms of maintaining or improving the physical and psychosocial well-being of adult cancer survivors. SEARCH METHODS We conducted electronic searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO up to February 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA Selection criteria focused on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of multidimensional interventions for adult cancer survivors. Interventions had to include a physical component and a psychosocial component and to have been carried out on two or more occasions following completion of primary cancer treatment. Outcomes had to be assessed using validated measures of physical health and psychosocial well-being. Non-English language papers were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Pairs of review authors independently selected trials, rated their methodological quality and extracted relevant data. Although meta-analyses of primary and secondary endpoints were planned there was a high level of study heterogeneity and only one common outcome measure (SF-36) could be statistically synthesised. In addition, we conducted a narrative analysis of interventions, particularly in terms of inspecting and identifying intervention components, grouping or categorising interventions and examining potential common links and outcomes. MAIN RESULTS Twelve RCTs (comprising 1669 participants) met the eligibility criteria. We judged five studies to have a moderate risk of bias and assessed the remaining seven as having a high risk of bias. It was possible to include SF-36 physical health component scores from five studies in a meta-analysis. Participating in a MDRP was associated with an increase in SF-36 physical health component scores (mean difference (MD) 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 4.31, P = 0.04). The findings from the narrative analysis suggested that MDRPs with a single domain or outcome focus appeared to be more successful than programmes with multiple aims. In addition, programmes that comprised participants with different types of cancer compared to cancer site-specific programmes were more likely to show positive improvements in physical outcomes. The most effective mode of service delivery appeared to be face-to-face contact supplemented with at least one follow-up telephone call. There was no evidence to indicate that MDRPs which lasted longer than six months improved outcomes beyond the level attained at six months. In addition, there was no evidence to suggest that services were more effective if they were delivered by a particular type of health professional. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is some evidence to support the effectiveness of brief, focused MDRPs for cancer survivors. Rigorous and methodologically sound clinical trials that include an economic analysis are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Scott
- Centre for Health Improvement, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|