Interventions for the treatment of borderline ovarian tumours

An algorithm for the pre-operative differentiation of benign ovarian tumours based on magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in a regional core hospital: A retrospective study

Objective

For selecting minimally invasive surgery (i.e. laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy) for treating ovarian tumours (OTs) in premenopausal patients, the pre-operative differentiation of benign ovarian tumours (Be-OTs) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation is important. This paper describes the authors' 8-year experience of approximately 1000 OT cases, and provides information about a diagnostic algorithm to help other hospitals.

Study design

The medical records of 901 patients aged < 50 years with OTs from 1 January 2015-31 March 31 2023 were reviewed. First, the accuracy of pre-operative differentiation between Be-OTs and borderline/malignant ovarian tumours (Bo/Ma-OTs) was compared in each type of OT. Second, to identify the factors influencing differentiation between Be-OTs and Bo/Ma-OTs in 164 serous/mucinous ovarian tumours (SM-OTs), a multi-variate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of 13 factors, including MRI findings, OT size and tumour markers.

Results

In the comparison of diagnostic accuracy of pre-operative MRI for each OT type, accuracy was found to be notably high for ovarian endometrial cyst (OEC) (n = 409), ovarian mature cystic teratoma (OMCT) (n = 308), ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma (OEA) (n = 6) and ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma (OCCA) (n = 14). On the other hand, discrepancies between MRI and pathological findings often occurred in SM-OTs, including ovarian serous cystadenoma (n = 86), ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 61), ovarian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 12) and ovarian mucinous adenocarcinoma (n = 5). In the multi-variate logistic regression analysis of the latter 164 patients, in addition to MRI findings, OT size and carbohydrate antigen 125 also had an effect to some extent. The combination of MRI interpretation and OT size may enhance differentiation of Be-OTs and Bo/Ma-OTs.

Conclusions

Among four types of OTs (OEC, OMCT, OEA and OCCA), MRI interpretation was able to differentiate between Be-OTs and Bo/Ma-OTs almost perfectly. Additionally, to mitigate the difficulty in differentiating SM-OTs, OT size may be useful in combination with MRI findings, although further accumulation and analysis of OT cases is needed.

Conservative treatment of borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective study

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are a group of tumors with histological aspects and intermediate biological evolution between benign and malignant tumors, characterized by epithelial proliferation, lack of stromal invasion and nuclear atypia. BOTs account for approximately 10-15% of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. The interest in fertility preservation is very important as most BOTs are diagnosed in patients less than 40 years of age. Since borderline tumors occur in young, fertile women, the therapeutic approach depends on both staging and the need to preserve ovarian function and fertility. Treatment of BOT is primarily surgical, but recently fertility-preserving surgery has become more important. If infertility persists, ovarian induction or in vitro fertilization (IVF) may be suggested in selected cases.

Management of Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT): results of a retrospective, single center study in Switzerland

BACKGROUND

Borderline tumors are malignant epithelial ovarian tumors with a very low incidence. Thus experience in diagnostics and treatment is still rare. The aim of this study was to present and analyze data of women with borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) regarding clinical features, histological characteristics, diagnostics and treatment management.

METHODS

In this single center retrospective study women with BOT treated at the Departement of Gynecology and Obstetrics at the Kantonsspital Luzern between 2011 and 2018 were analyzed according to their clinical and histological reports.

RESULTS

A total of 42 women were enrolled. The median age was 58.5 with a range from 26 to 85, of which 31 (73.8%) were postmenopausal. Regarding the histological subtypes, 23 women (54.8%) had serous and 15 (35.7%) had mucinous BOT. Seromucinous histology was found in 3 patients (7.1%) and endometrioid in 1 woman (2.4%), respectively. All women underwent surgery. In a total of 39 women (92.9%) a complete surgical staging for BOT was performed. In 29 women (69.0%) staging was performed by laparoscopy, 13 (31.0%) underwent laparotomy. The mean follow up was 52 months (range = 16.3-101.4 months). During this period two patients, initially diagnosed in FIGO stage 1, recurred after 21.7 and 44 months, respectively, the second woman died after 53 months because of the BOT.

CONCLUSION

In the present study women were treated according to the international therapy recommendations and the rate of recurrence was very low. The most common risk factors for relapse are known to be FIGO stage, incomplete staging and peritoneal implants but were not present in our group. Thus further studies are necessary to investigate additional recurrence risks.

Identification of factors that impact recurrence in patients with borderline ovarian tumors

Background

The lack of consensus around best practices for management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is, in part, to the lack of available data and of clarity in interpreting relationships among various factors that impact outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify clinicopathological factors that impact prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) and to address features of this disease with the objective of providing clarity in decision making around management of BOT.

Results

A total of 178 BOT patients were included in this study, with a median age of 43 years and a median follow-up time of 37 months. Thirty-two (18.0%) recurrences and 5 (2.8%) deaths were observed in this study group. Multivariate analysis showed that fertility-preserving surgery (P = 0.0223 for bilateral cystectomy) and invasive implants (P = 0.0030) were significantly associated with worse PFS, whereas lymphadenectomy (P = 0.0129) was related to improved PFS. No factors were found to be associated with OS due to the limited number of deaths. In addition, patients with serous BOT more commonly had abnormal levels of CA125, while patients with mucinous BOT more commonly had abnormal levels of CEA. Patients with abnormal levels of CA125, or CA19-9, or HE4 had significantly larger tumor sizes.

Conclusions

Our study reveals the impact of certain types of fertility-preserving surgery, lymphadenectomy and invasive implants on PFS of BOT patients. Blood cancer markers may be associated with histology and size of BOT. Our findings may assist in selection of optimum treatment for BOT patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13048-017-0316-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fertility preservation in women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers

Background

Although cancer in general affects an aged population, a significant number of women develop cancer at childbearing age. Long-term survival rates after gynecological cancer, especially in young patients are increasing and all quality-of-life aspects, including preservation of fertility have become of major relevance.

Outcomes

Surgical techniques aimed at sparing reproductive organs and preserving fertility have been developed for women presenting with gynecological cancer found at early stages. Indications for fertility-sparing surgery are in general restricted to women presenting with a well-differentiated low-grade tumor in its early stages or with low malignant potential. Up to now, use of fertility-sparing techniques in well-selected patients has not been shown to affect overall survival negatively and fertility outcomes reported have been favorable. Still larger amounts of data and longer follow-up periods are needed. Several current fertility-sparing cancer treatments may result in sub-fertility and in those cases assisted reproductive techniques are indicated. Overall quality of life has been satisfactory in cancer patients after fertility-sparing surgery.

Conclusions

Fertility-sparing surgery is a viable tool to enable gynecological cancer patients of young age to fulfill their family building without impairment of oncological outcome. Cancer patients of reproductive age should undergo fertility counseling to analyze this sensitive subject. Further studies are needed to investigate the role of fertility-sparing treatment and combined adjuvant therapy in higher-grade cancers.

Borderline tumours of the ovary, current controversies regarding their diagnosis and treatment

Borderline ovarian tumours generally affect women of reproductive age. The positive prognosis is related to the fact that over 80% of cases are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. Although radical surgery is the standard of care for this disease, fertility-sparing surgery can be performed in selected cases. Since it was first described in 1929, the knowledge of the molecular and histologic characteristics has been significantly improved. In this review, advances in the clinical behaviour, pathologic characteristics, prognostics factors, and different strategies of treatment are discussed.

Frequency of mutations and polymorphisms in borderline ovarian tumors of known cancer genes

Borderline ovarian tumors represent an understudied subset of ovarian tumors. Most studies investigating aberrations in borderline tumors have focused on KRAS/BRAF mutations. In this study, we conducted an extensive analysis of mutations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in borderline ovarian tumors. Using the Sequenom MassArray platform, we investigated 160 mutations/polymorphisms in 33 genes involved in cell signaling, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation and cellular senescence. Of 52 tumors analyzed, 33 were serous, 18 mucinous and 1 endometrioid. KRAS c.35G>A p.Gly12Asp mutations were detected in eight tumors (six serous and two mucinous), BRAF V600E mutations in two serous tumors, and PIK3CA H1047Y and PIK3CA E542K mutations in a serous and an endometrioid BOT, respectively. CTNNB1 mutation was detected in a serous tumor. Potentially functional polymorphisms were found in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), ABCB1, FGFR2 and PHLPP2. VEGF polymorphisms were the most common and detected at four loci. PHLPP2 polymorphisms were more frequent in mucinous as compared with serous tumors (P=0.04), with allelic imbalance in one case. This study represents the largest and most comprehensive analysis of mutations and functional SNPs in borderline ovarian tumors to date. At least 25% of borderline ovarian tumors harbor somatic mutations associated with potential response to targeted therapeutics.

Survey of the management of borderline ovarian tumors in the United Kingdom

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) represent approximately 10% of ovarian neoplasms and are a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable biological behaviour. The majority present with disease confined to the ovary and have an excellent prognosis after surgical removal. A small proportion subsequently has recurrent disease or progression to invasive cancer. Tumor recurrence can occur up to 20 years after surgical resection. There are no robust clinical, histological or molecular markers that distinguish high risk cases and no satisfactory treatment for patients with progressive disease. This results in great variability in management in different centres. We conducted a national survey on the management of borderline ovarian tumors in cancer centres representing different regions in the United Kingdom. In this article we review the literature for the current concepts in diagnosis, treatment and follow up of BOTs and we report the results of the survey of current practice in the United Kingdom. On that basis we provide recommendations for the management of patients with BOTs.

Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence

By comparison with ovarian carcinomas, borderline ovarian tumours are characterised clinically by superior overall survival, even in women with peritoneal spread. In this Review, we aimed to clarify the histological and clinical factors potentially defining a high-risk group in whom disease is likely to evolve to invasive disease. Invasive peritoneal implants (in serous borderline ovarian tumours) and residual disease after surgery were the two factors clearly identified. Other factors are controversial owing to increased risk of invasive recurrence: micropapillary patterns in serous borderline ovarian tumour, intraepithelial carcinoma in mucinous lesions, stromal microinvasion in serous lesions, and use of cystectomy in mucinous borderline ovarian tumours. The pathologist has a pivotal role in assessment of the borderline nature of ovarian tumours and in identification of high-risk criteria, most of which are histological. But, reproducibility of the histological interpretation of some of these potential criteria--eg, classification of peritoneal implants (particularly in desmoplastic subtype), stromal microinvasion, micropapillary patterns, and intraepithelial carcinoma in mucinous borderline ovarian tumours--remains unclear, and should be investigated.