Early versus delayed mobilisation for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Despite advancements in treating ruptured cerebral aneurysms, an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is still a grave cerebrovascular disease associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Based on the literature published to date, worldwide academic and governmental committees have developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to propose standards for disease management in order to achieve the best treatment outcomes for aSAHs. In 2013, the Korean Society of Cerebrovascular Surgeons issued a Korean version of the CPGs for aSAHs. The group researched all articles and major foreign CPGs published in English until December 2015 using several search engines. Based on these articles, levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were determined by our society as well as by other related Quality Control Committees from neurointervention, neurology and rehabilitation medicine. The Korean version of the CPGs for aSAHs includes risk factors, diagnosis, initial management, medical and surgical management to prevent rebleeding, management of delayed cerebral ischemia and vasospasm, treatment of hydrocephalus, treatment of medical complications and early rehabilitation. The CPGs are not the absolute standard but are the present reference as the evidence is still incomplete, each environment of clinical practice is different, and there is a high probability of variation in the current recommendations. The CPGs will be useful in the fields of clinical practice and research.

[The early post-stroke mobilization]

Early mobilization is an important prerequisite for the successful recovery after stroke. However, it is unclear at present how early mobilization should be started after stroke. Three randomized controlled trials were devoted to the comparison of the effectiveness and safety of very early (within the first day after stroke) and early (within two days after stroke) mobilization. The meta-analysis of the results of these studies did not reveal any advantages of very early mobilization over early mobilization. One randomized control study was designed to compare the consequences of mobilization within 3 and 7 days after stroke. It has demonstrated that earlier mobilization is associated with fewer complications and does not exert negative effect on cerebral haemodynamics. A number of observational studies confirmed the positive effect of early mobilization on the outcome of stroke. It is concluded that it may be justified to start mobilization on the second day after stroke provided there are no contraindications to such modality. The practicability of very early mobilization remains to be elucidated.