Surgical interventions for treating distal tibial metaphyseal fractures in adults

Angular stable locking in a novel intramedullary nail improves construct stability in a distal tibia fracture model

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nails are frequently used for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures. However, insufficient fixation of the distal fragment could result in delayed healing, malunion or nonunion. Recently, a novel concept for angular stable nailing was developed that maintains the principle of relative stability and introduces improvements expected to reduce nail toggling, screw migration and secondary loss of reduction. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical competence of the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept for treatment of unstable distal tibia fractures, compared to a conventional nail locking in a human cadaveric model under dynamic loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae with a simulated AO/OTA 42-A3.1 fracture were assigned to 2 groups for reamed intramedullary nailing using either a conventional (non-angular stable) Expert Tibia Nail (ETN) with 3 distal screws or the novel Tibia Nail Advanced (TNA) system with 2 distal angular stable locking low-profile retaining screws. The specimens were biomechanically tested under conditions including initial quasi-static loading, followed by progressively increasing combined cyclic axial and torsional loading in internal rotation until failure of the bone-implant construct. Both tests were monitored by means of motion tracking.

RESULTS

Initial nail toggling of the distal tibia fragment in varus and flexion under axial loading was lower for TNA compared to ETN, being significant in flexion, P = 0.91 and P = 0.03. After 5000 cycles, interfragmentary movements in terms of varus, flexion, internal rotation, axial displacement, and shear displacement at the fracture site were all lower for TNA compared to ETN, with flexion and shear displacement being significant, P = 0.14, P = 0.04, P = 0.25, P = 0.11 and P = 0.04, respectively. Cycles to failure until both interfragmentary 5° varus and 5° flexion were significantly higher for TNA compared to ETN, P = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

From a biomechanical perspective, the novel angular stable intramedullary nail concept provides increased construct stability and maintains it over time while reducing the number of required locking screws without impeding the flexibility of the nail itself and resists better towards loss of reduction under dynamic loading, compared to conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.

A New Technique for Placement of Blocking Screws and its Mechanical Effect on Stability of Tibia Fractures with Distal Fragments after Insertion of Small-Diameter Intramedullary Nails

Objective

To design a novel blocking screws (BSs) geometry and insertion method to treat distal tibia fracture with nailing and comparison of mechanical properties of novel and traditional screws.

Methods

Twenty‐one synthetic left tibiae were sectioned to obtain 21 distal segments measuring 55 mm. Intramedullary (IM) 9‐mm tibial nails were advanced to 6 mm from the ankle joint. Two transverse and one anterior–posterior (AP) locking screws were inserted. Both medial–lateral (ML) BSs were placed 10 mm from the topmost interlocking screw. A custom‐made jig assisted in placing the novel and traditional BSs. The time spent in placing each BS was recorded. All the samples were repaired with an IM nail and without BSs, with two traditional BSs, and with two novel BSs. An initial loading from −150 to +150 N was applied to specimens in the ML direction at 185 mm from the nail end, followed by cyclic loading of the same for 10,000 cycles with failure‐to‐test loading of 350 N in the ML direction. The maximum displacement was measured at 80 mm from the nail end and recorded under initial loading. The damage of two kinds of BSs to the nail was recorded.

Results

Compared with average 5.21 min of the time of placing a traditional BS, the time spent in positioning a novel BS on the fracture model was 2.53 min. In the distal bone–implant constructs (BICs), the addition of traditional BSs decreased the maximum displacement of the BICs by 26.2%. The addition of the novel BSs decreased the displacement by 28.9%. All constructs survived 10,000 cycles without hardware deformation. The failure rate of the control group was significantly greater than that of the traditional group; however, the novel group was similar to the traditional group. The damage of the traditional BS to the nail was greater than that of the novel one.

Conclusions

The novel and traditional BSs are comparably effective for increasing the primary mechanical stability of distal metaphyseal fractures after nailin. However, compared to the placement of a traditional BS, implanting a novel BS took more less time and caused less damage to the nail. Additionally, the most obvious advantage of the novel BS design and insertion technology was that the pressure and distance between it and the IM nail could be controlled by rotating the screw. These advantages of the novel BS will be beneficial for clinical application.

May minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis be an alternative to intramedullary nailing in selected spiral oblique and spiral wedge tibial shaft fractures?

Objectives

This study aims to compare intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) treatment methods in Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) 42A1 & 42B1 selected tibial shaft fractures.

Patients and methods

Fifty-one patients (31 males, 20 females; mean age 43.5±14.2 years; range, 18 to 81 years) operated for AO 42A1 or AO 42B1 tibial shaft fractures between January 2006 and January 2012 were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three of these patients were treated with MIPO and 28 with IMN. Patients were compared in terms of union time, return to work, infection, malunion, hospital stay, and sixth month and two-year Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) values.

Results

There was no difference between the MIPO and IMN groups in terms of demographic data, etiology, and fracture patterns. The mean follow-up time was 37.8±8.8 months in MIPO group and 35.9±8.7 months in IMN group. Union time (p=0.575), return to work (p=0.155), infection (p=0.643), malunion (p=0.471), and hospital stay (p=0.538) were all similar between groups. Although the LEFS value was higher in IMN group in sixth month (p=0.026), the two-year LEFS value was similar between groups (p=0.085).

Conclusion

Results of the study showed that both treatment methods are similar regarding clinical and functional outcomes. According to these results, MIPO can be recommended as an alternative to IMN in tibial shaft fractures formed as spiral oblique and spiral wedge.

Surgical Management of Distal Tibia Fracture: Towards An Outcome-based Treatment Algorithm

Introduction:

Distal tibia fractures are frequently associated with an extensive soft tissue injury which then leads to a higher risk of complications such as infection, non-union and eventually poor overall outcome. The purpose of this study is to measure the outcome of distal tibia fractures treated with internal fixation, external fixator or Ilizarov external fixator(IEF). We aim to propose an algorithm for management of distal tibia fractures by evaluating the treatment options, outcomes and risk factors present.

Material and Methods:

This study is a cross-sectional study of all distal tibia fractures treated surgically in Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital, Klang from 1st January 2016 till 30th June 2018. Patient records were reviewed to analyse the outcomes of surgical treatment and risk factors associated with it.

Results:

Ninety-one patients were included with a mean age of 41.5 years (SD = 16.4). Thirty-nine cases (42.9%) were open fractures. Thirty-eight patients (41.8%) were treated with internal fixation, 27 patients (29.7%) were treated with IEF and 26 patients (28.6%) were treated with an external fixator. Among open fractures cases, no significant finding can be concluded when comparing each surgical option and its outcome, although one option was seen better than the other in a particular outcome. Initial skeletal traction or temporary spanning external fixator in close fractures reduced the risk of mal-alignment (p value=0.001). Internal fixation is seen superior to IEF and external fixator in close fractures in term of articular surface reduction (p value = 0.043) and risk of mal-alignment (p value = 0.007).

Conclusion:

There is no single method of fixation that is ideal for all pilon fractures and suitable for all patients. This proposed algorithm can help surgeons in deciding treatment strategies in the challenging management of distal tibia fractures to reduce associated complications.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for short oblique diaphyseal tibia fractures: does fracture site affect the outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

To report the results of patients with short oblique diaphyseal tibia fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO). The secondary aim was to understand the effect of fracture location (midshaft or distal 1/3) on outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with short oblique (>30°) tibial shaft fractures (AO/OTA 42A2) treated with plate and MIPO technique between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively assessed. Age, gender, follow-up time, fracture type (open or closed), operation time, postoperative infection rate, union time, ankle joint range of motion, and complications were analyzed. Patients' radiographs at a minimum 1-year follow-up were evaluated for malunion, nonunion, and implant-related complications.

RESULTS

Mean age and follow-up time were 47.0 ± 15.7 years and 18.3 ± 12.1 months, respectively. Mean bone union time was 3.66 ± 1.04 months in middle 1/3 diaphysis and 4.23 ± 1.48 months in distal 1/3 tibia fractures. Seven (25%) patients developed superficial infections. Mean union time, malunion rate, coronal and sagittal angulation, operation length, and infection rate were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

MIPO is an effective method for treatment of short oblique diaphyseal tibia fractures, and results in few complications. Both distal and midshaft fractures have similar union and malunion rates.

An intuitive and simple technique for accurate insertion point selection and precise Poller (blocking) screw insertion

Although indirect reduction with intramedullary (IM) nailing is the gold standard for long bone fractures, IM nailing in meta-diaphyseal fractures often results in malalignment. Placement of Poller (blocking) screws is an attractive and useful technique in these situations; however, the selection of accurate placement points and the placement process itself are often complicated. This paper proposes an intuitive, simple, and clear technique for selecting the location of Poller screw placement that can be used in either the anteroposterior or lateral view regardless of the fracture type and discusses techniques for Poller screw placement that enable displacement correction.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following external fixation or open reduction internal fixation for distal intra-articular tibial fractures: an update

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing physical function and complications following DIATF surgery with external fixation (EF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHOD

A search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Open Grey and Orthopaedic Proceedings. Studies with a level of evidence of I-III on patients (≥ 18 years) with DIATFs operated on with either EF or ORIF were included. A total of 3814 studies were identified. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for nonrandomised studies were used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

Nine studies with 478 patients, 271 ORIF and 197 EF met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 38 months. The meta-analysis showed a higher incidence of superficial wound infections (RR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.62-5.34, p = 0.0004) and malunions (RR = 2.62, 95% CI 1.27-5.43, p = 0.009) in the EF group compared to the ORIF group. Also worse physical function was associated with the EF group. However, the overall evidence was low.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review is the first to report on physical function following DIATF surgery. In general, decreased physical function was reported. The meta-analysis showed lower incidence of superficial wound infection and malunion rates in the ORIF group. Heterogeneity was low. In conclusion, this review reports lower complication rates following ORIF for DIATF. The overall evidence was limited, and therefore, the authors cannot recommend ORIF to be superior to EF treatment for DIATF. More multi-centre studies with larger sample sizes are needed to assess long-term physical function and complications following DIATF surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Does the Use of Blocking Screws Improve Radiological Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibia Fractures?

Aim

The aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of blocking screws during intramedullary nailing of a distal tibia fracture improved the radiological outcome and prevented a loss of fracture alignment. As a secondary outcome, the time to radiographic union was compared to see if a more rigid bone-implant construct had an effect on healing.

Methods

We searched computerized records at a UK level 1 major trauma center. The joint alignment was measured on the immediate postoperative radiograph and compared to the most recent radiograph. We used a difference of 2° to indicate a progressive deformity.

Results

Thirty patients were included. Twenty patients had no blocking screw and 10 patients had a blocking screw. Six patients had a difference in their coronal plane alignment of 2° or more (3/6 had no blocking screw). The results were analyzed and found to be not statistically significant (p = 0.82). The addition of a blocking screw has also been shown not to have an effect on the time to radiological union (RUST score greater or equal to 10).

Conclusion

We use a 2.5-mm blocking wire to aid in fracture reduction prior to reaming or nail insertion and then remove the wire when the nail has been adequately locked. We no longer routinely replace the wire with a blocking screw and this could lead to a decrease in procedure time, cost, and radiation exposure.

How to cite this article

Fawdington RA, Lotfi N, Beaven A, et al. Does the Use of Blocking Screws Improve Radiological Outcomes Following Intramedullary Nailing of Distal Tibia Fractures? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):11–14.

Extra-articular distal tibia fractures-controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study

Distal tibia fractures are reported to have a high complication rate pre-operatively as well as post-operatively, which can include open fractures, soft tissue damage, infection, malalignment, pseudarthrosis and ankle arthrosis. The operative treatment for the extra-articular distal tibia fractures is a controversial topic in the orthopaedic literature. Some of these fractures are proximal enough to be treated with an intramedullary nail while others are too distal for that. The aim of our study was to compare the results we have had with intramedullary nail (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in distal metaphyseal (extra-articular) tibia fractures. The study was designed prospectively between January 2013 and March 2016 and took place on the Orthopaedics and Traumatology ward of a Clinical Emergency County Hospital in western Romania. The follow-up visits were scheduled one month, three months and six months post-operatively. For evaluating the ankle function, we used the Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) and union was evaluated at six months on ankle X-rays. At the six-month follow-up visit the average scores were 75.55 (20-100) for the IMN lot and 74.23 (20-90) for the MIPO lot, without finding any statistical difference between the two groups (p >0.1). At the six-month follow-up, X-ray union was objected in 48 (90.5%) of our patients, the IMN lot having worse results (85.18%) than the MIPO lot (96.15%). The results we encountered showed little to no statistical difference when it comes to the functional score we used (OMAS score), leading us to believe that you can achieve comparable results with both implants.