Couple and family therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

Retention in Individual Trauma-Focused Treatment Following Family-Based Treatment Among US Veterans

Importance

Despite the availability of several empirically supported trauma-focused interventions, retention in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) psychotherapy is poor. Preliminary efficacy data shows that brief, family-based interventions may improve treatment retention in a veteran's individual PTSD treatment, although whether this occurs in routine clinical practice is not established.

Objective

To characterize receipt of family therapy among veterans diagnosed with PTSD and evaluate whether participation in family therapy is associated with an increased likelihood of completing individual trauma-focused treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure to extract electronic health record data of participants. All participants were US veterans diagnosed with PTSD between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, who attended at least 1 individual trauma-focused treatment session. Statistical analysis was performed from May to August 2023.

Exposures

Receipt of any family psychotherapy and subtype of family-based psychotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Minimally adequate individual trauma-focused treatment completion (ie, 8 or more sessions of trauma-focused treatment in a 6-month period).

Results

Among a total of 1 516 887 US veterans with VHA patient data included in the study, 58 653 (3.9%) received any family therapy; 334 645 (23.5%) were Black, 1 006 168 (70.5%) were White, and 86 176 (6.0%) were other race; 1 322 592 (87.2%) were male; 1 201 902 (79.9%) lived in urban areas; and the mean (SD) age at first individual psychotherapy appointment was 52.7 (15.9) years. Among the 58 653 veterans (3.9%) who received any family therapy, 36 913 (62.9%) received undefined family therapy only, 15 528 (26.5%) received trauma-informed cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy (CBCT) only, 5210 (8.9%) received integrative behavioral couples therapy (IBCT) only, and 282 (0.5%) received behavioral family therapy (BFT) only. Compared with receiving no family therapy, the odds of completing individual PTSD treatment were 7% higher for veterans who also received CBCT (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13]) and 68% higher for veterans received undefined family therapy (OR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.63-1.74]). However, compared with receiving no family therapy care, veterans had 26% lower odds of completing individual PTSD treatment if they were also receiving IBCT (OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.66-0.82]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of US veterans, family-based psychotherapies were found to differ substantially in their associations with individual PTSD psychotherapy retention. These findings highlight potential benefits of concurrently providing family-based therapy with individual PTSD treatment but also the need for careful clinical attention to the balance between family-based therapies and individual PTSD treatment.

[Together in the face of extreme violence: accompanying families after a traumatic event]

After a traumatic event, families can also be impacted at different levels and require post-immediate or longer-term care. The adaptation of these family care procedures carried out following the attacks of 2015-2016 in France, based on existing clinical arrangements, in a child psychiatry service associated with a medical-psychological emergency unit, is discussed via two clinical examples. These different modalities of follow-up, a family debriefing and a situation of mourning associated with a trauma insist on the necessity to consider the temporality of the follow-up, the use of different theoretical tools, as well as the importance given to rituals and family skills hard hit by the traumatic event.

Modulation of PARP-1 Activity in a Broad Time Window Attenuates Memorizing Fear

The amygdala plays a critical role in the acquisition and consolidation of fear-related memories. Recent studies have demonstrated that ADP-ribosylation of histones, accelerated by PARPs, affects the chromatin structure and the binding of chromatin remodeling complexes with transcription factors. Inhibition of PARP-1 activity during the labile phase of re-consolidation may erase memory. Accordingly, we investigated the possibility of interfering with fear conditioning by PARP-1 inhibition. Herein, we demonstrate that injection of PARP-1 inhibitors, specifically into the CeA or i.p., in different time windows post-retrieval, attenuates freezing behavior. Moreover, the association of memory with pharmacokinetic timing of PARP inhibitor arrival to the brain enabled/achieved attenuation of a specific cue-associated memory of fear but did not hinder other memories (even traumatic events) associated with other cues. Our results suggest using PARP-1 inhibitors as a new avenue for future treatment of PTSD by disrupting specific traumatic memories in a broad time window, even long after the traumatic event. The safety of using these PARP inhibitors, that is, not interfering with other natural memories, is an added value.

Developing a community-supported risk reduction intervention for syringe exchange registrants and their drug-free family or friends: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

People engaged in injection opioid use often have drug-free family or friends that could be mobilized to support risk reduction and treatment seeking.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a 6-week community-supported risk reduction group intervention for syringe exchange program (SEP) registrants and drug-free network members.

METHOD

The group provided risk reduction and treatment readiness education, with weekly assignments for participants to engage together in community activities designed to meet other drug-free people.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine SEP registrants (and 39 community supports) enrolled in the study, and 21 pairs attended at least one group. For this smaller sample, participants attended 67% of scheduled sessions and engaged in scheduled activities during 42% of the study weeks, with 48% of SEP participants (n = 10) choosing to enter substance use disorder treatment. SEP participants who entered treatment reported reduced rates of injection drug use, opioid use, and cocaine use.

CONCLUSIONS

While this intervention shows promise for linking syringe exchange and substance use disorder treatment participation in select SEP registrants, outcomes demonstrating low demand and modest acceptability suggest that additional research is necessary to understand barriers to participation and motivate higher levels of engagement.

Couple and family therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) refers to an anxiety or trauma- and stressor-related disorder that is linked to personal or vicarious exposure to traumatic events. PTSD is associated with a range of adverse individual outcomes (e.g. poor health, suicidality) and significant interpersonal problems which include difficulties in intimate and family relationships. A range of couple- and family-based treatments have been suggested as appropriate interventions for families impacted by PTSD.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review were to: (1) assess the effects of couple and family therapies for adult PTSD, relative to 'no treatment' conditions, 'standard care', and structured or non-specific individual or group psychological therapies; (2) examine the clinical characteristics of studies that influence the relative effects of these therapies; and (3) critically evaluate methodological characteristics of studies that may bias the research findings.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1950- ), Embase (1980- ) and PsycINFO (1967- ) via the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register (CCMDCTR) to 2014, then directly via Ovid after this date. We also searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Library. We conducted supplementary searches of PTSDPubs (all available years) (this database is formerly known as PILOTS (Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress)). We manually searched the early editions of key journals and screened the reference lists and bibliographies of included studies to identify other relevant research. We also contacted the authors of included trials for unpublished information. Studies have been incorporated from searches to 3 March 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of couple or family therapies for PTSD in adult samples. The review considered any type of therapy that was intended to treat intact couples or families where at least one adult family member met criteria for PTSD. It was required that participants were diagnosed with PTSD according to recognised classification systems.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures prescribed by Cochrane. Three review authors screened all titles and abstracts and two authors independently extracted data from each study deemed eligible and assessed the risk of bias for each study. We used odds ratios (OR) to summarise the effects of interventions for dichotomous outcomes, and standardised mean differences (SMD) to summarise post-treatment between-group differences on continuous measures.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials in the review. Two studies examined the effects of cognitive behavioural conjoint/couple's therapy (CBCT) relative to a wait list control condition, although one of these studies only reported outcomes in relation to relationship satisfaction. One study examined the effects of structural approach therapy (SAT) relative to a PTSD family education (PFE) programme; and one examined the effects of adjunct behavioural family therapy (BFT) but failed to report any outcome variables in sufficient detail - we did not include it in the meta-analysis. One trial with 40 couples (80 participants) showed that CBCT was more effective than wait list control in reducing PTSD severity (SMD -1.12, 95% CI -1.79 to -0.45; low-quality evidence), anxiety (SMD -0.93, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.27; very low-quality evidence) and depression (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.02; very low-quality evidence) at post-treatment for the primary patient with PTSD. Data from two studies indicated that treatment and control groups did not differ significantly according to relationship satisfaction (SMD 1.07, 95% CI -0.17 to 2.31; very low-quality evidence); and one study showed no significant differences regarding depression (SMD 0.28, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.90; very low-quality evidence) or anxiety symptoms (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.77; very low-quality evidence) for the partner of the patient with PTSD. One trial with 57 couples (114 participants) showed that SAT was more effective than PFE in reducing PTSD severity for the primary patient (SMD -1.32, 95% CI -1.90 to -0.74; low-quality evidence) at post-treatment. There was no evidence of differences on the other outcomes, including relationship satisfaction (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.51 to 0.53; very low-quality evidence), depression (SMD 0.21, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.73; very low-quality evidence) and anxiety (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.68 to 0.36; very low-quality evidence) for intimate partners; and depression (SMD -0.28, 95% CI -0.81 to 0.24; very low-quality evidence) or anxiety (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.87 to 0.18; very low-quality evidence) for the primary patient. Two studies reported on adverse events and dropout rates, and no significant differences between groups were observed. Two studies were classified as having a 'low' or 'unclear' risk of bias in most domains, except for performance bias that was rated 'high'. Two studies had significant amounts of missing information resulting in 'unclear' risk of bias. There were too few studies available to conduct subgroup analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are few trials of couple-based therapies for PTSD and evidence is insufficient to determine whether these offer substantive benefits when delivered alone or in addition to psychological interventions. Preliminary RCTs suggest, however, that couple-based therapies for PTSD may be potentially beneficial for reducing PTSD symptoms, and there is a need for additional trials of both adjunctive and stand-alone interventions with couples or families which target reduced PTSD symptoms, mental health problems of family members and dyadic measures of relationship quality.