1
|
Hinkle JJ, Olschowka JA, Williams JP, O'Banion MK. Pharmacologic Manipulation of Complement Receptor 3 Prevents Dendritic Spine Loss and Cognitive Impairment After Acute Cranial Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:912-923. [PMID: 38142839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cranial irradiation induces healthy tissue damage that can lead to neurocognitive complications, negatively affecting patient quality of life. One damage indicator associated with cognitive impairment is loss of neuronal spine density. We previously demonstrated that irradiation-mediated spine loss is microglial complement receptor 3 (CR3) and sex dependent. We hypothesized that these changes are associated with late-delayed cognitive deficits and amenable to pharmacologic intervention. METHODS AND MATERIALS Our model of cranial irradiation (acute, 10 Gy gamma) used male and female CR3-wild type and CR3-deficient Thy-1 YFP mice of C57BL/6 background. Forty-five days after irradiation and behavioral testing, we quantified spine density and markers of microglial reactivity in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. In a separate experiment, male Thy-1 YFP C57BL/6 mice were treated with leukadherin-1, a modulator of CR3 function. RESULTS We found that male mice demonstrate irradiation-mediated spine loss and cognitive deficits but that female and CR3 knockout mice do not. These changes were associated with greater reactivity of microglia in male mice. Pharmacologic manipulation of CR3 with LA1 prevented spine loss and cognitive deficits in irradiated male mice. CONCLUSIONS This work improves our understanding of irradiation-mediated mechanisms and sex dependent responses and may help identify novel therapeutics to reduce irradiation-induced cognitive decline and improve patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Hinkle
- Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Neuroscience Institute
| | | | | | - M Kerry O'Banion
- Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Neuroscience Institute; Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kirkman MA, Day J, Gehring K, Zienius K, Grosshans D, Taphoorn M, Li J, Brown PD. Interventions for preventing and ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 11:CD011335. [PMID: 36427235 PMCID: PMC9697842 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011335.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive deficits are common in people who have received cranial irradiation and have a serious impact on daily functioning and quality of life. The benefit of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of cognitive deficits in this population is unclear. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2014. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of interventions for preventing or ameliorating cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. SEARCH METHODS For this review update we searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and PsycInfo via Ovid to 12 September 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled (RCTs) trials that evaluated pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions in cranial irradiated adults, with objective cognitive functioning as a primary or secondary outcome measure. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (MK, JD) independently extracted data from selected studies and carried out a risk of bias assessment. Cognitive function, fatigue and mood outcomes were reported. No data were pooled. MAIN RESULTS Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this updated review. Six were from the original version of the review, and two more were added when the search was updated. Nineteen further studies were assessed as part of this update but did not fulfil the inclusion criteria. Of the eight included studies, four studies investigated "prevention" of cognitive problems (during radiotherapy and follow-up) and four studies investigated "amelioration" (interventions to treat cognitive impairment as a late complication of radiotherapy). There were five pharmacological studies (two studies on prevention and three in amelioration) and three non-pharmacological studies (two on prevention and one in amelioration). Due to differences between studies in the interventions being evaluated, a meta-analysis was not possible. Studies in early radiotherapy treatment phase (five studies) Pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" were designed to prevent or ameliorate cognitive deficits and included drugs used in dementia (memantine) and fatigue (d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride). Non-pharmacological studies in the "early radiotherapy treatment phase" included a ketogenic diet and a two-week cognitive rehabilitation and problem-solving programme. In the memantine study, the primary cognitive outcome of memory at six months did not reach significance, but there was significant improvement in overall cognitive function compared to placebo, with similar adverse events across groups. The d-threo-methylphenidate hydrochloride study found no statistically significant difference between arms, with few adverse events. The study of a calorie-restricted ketogenic diet found no effect, although a lower than expected calorie intake in the control group complicates interpretation of the results. The study investigating the utility of a rehabilitation program did not carry out a statistical comparison of cognitive performance between groups. Studies in delayed radiation or late effect phase (four studies) The "amelioration" pharmacological studies to treat cognitive complications of radiotherapy included drugs used in dementia (donepezil) or psychostimulants (methylphenidate and modafinil). Non-pharmacological measures included cognitive rehabilitation and problem solving (Goal Management Training). These studies included patients with cognitive problems at entry who had "stable" brain cancer. The donepezil study did not find an improvement in the primary cognitive outcome of overall cognitive performance, but did find improvement in an individual test of memory, compared to placebo; adverse events were not reported. A study comparing methylphenidate with modafinil found improvements in cognitive function in both the methylphenidate and modafinil arms; few adverse events were reported. Another study comparing two different doses of modafinil combined treatment arms and found improvements across all cognitive tests, however, a number of adverse events were reported. Both studies were limited by a small sample size. The Goal Management Training study suggested a benefit of the intervention, a behavioural intervention that combined mindfulness and strategy training, on executive function and processing speed. There were a number of limitations across studies and few were without high risks of bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In this update, limited additional evidence was found for the treatment or amelioration of cognitive deficits in adults treated with cranial irradiation. As concluded in the original review, there is supportive evidence that memantine may help prevent cognitive deficits for adults with brain metastases receiving cranial irradiation. There is supportive evidence that donepezil, methylphenidate and modafinil may have a role in treating cognitive deficits in adults with brain tumours who have been treated with cranial irradiation; patient withdrawal affected the statistical power of these studies. Further research that tries to minimise the withdrawal of consent, and subsequently reduce the requirement for imputation procedures, may offer a higher certainty of evidence. There is evidence from only a single small study to support non-pharmacological interventions in the amelioration of cognitive deficits. Further research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew A Kirkman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Julia Day
- Community Rehabilitation and Brain Injury Service (CRABIS), Strathbrock Partnership Centre, West Lothian, UK
| | - Karin Gehring
- Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Karolis Zienius
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology (ECNO), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Grosshans
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Martin Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 432, Netherlands
| | - Jing Li
- Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parsons MW, Peters KB, Floyd SR, Brown P, Wefel JS. Preservation of neurocognitive function in the treatment of brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:v96-v107. [PMID: 34859237 PMCID: PMC8633744 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurocognitive function (NCF) deficits are common in patients with brain metastases, occurring in up to 90% of cases. NCF deficits may be caused by tumor-related factors and/or treatment for the metastasis, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. In recent years, strategies to prevent negative impact of treatments and ameliorate cognitive deficits for patients with brain tumors have gained momentum. In this review, we report on research that has established the efficacy of preventative and rehabilitative therapies for NCF deficits in patients with brain metastases. Surgical strategies include the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy and intraoperative mapping. Radiotherapy approaches include focal treatments such as stereotactic radiosurgery and tailored approaches such as hippocampal avoidant whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Pharmacologic options include use of the neuroprotectant memantine to reduce cognitive decline induced by WBRT and incorporation of medications traditionally used for attention and memory problems. Integration of neuropsychology into the care of patients with brain metastases helps characterize cognitive patterns, educate patients and families regarding their management, and guide rehabilitative therapies. These and other strategies will become even more important for long-term survivors of brain metastases as treatment options improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Parsons
- Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine B Peters
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Scott R Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Paul Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walsh J, Cave J, Griffiths F. Spontaneously Generated Online Patient Experience of Modafinil: A Qualitative and NLP Analysis. Front Digit Health 2021; 3:598431. [PMID: 34713085 PMCID: PMC8521895 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.598431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To compare the findings from a qualitative and a natural language processing (NLP) based analysis of online patient experience posts on patient experience of the effectiveness and impact of the drug Modafinil. Methods: Posts (n = 260) from 5 online social media platforms where posts were publicly available formed the dataset/corpus. Three platforms asked posters to give a numerical rating of Modafinil. Thematic analysis: data was coded and themes generated. Data were categorized into PreModafinil, Acquisition, Dosage, and PostModafinil and compared to identify each poster's own view of whether taking Modafinil was linked to an identifiable outcome. We classified this as positive, mixed, negative, or neutral and compared this with numerical ratings. NLP: Corpus text was speech tagged and keywords and key terms extracted. We identified the following entities: drug names, condition names, symptoms, actions, and side-effects. We searched for simple relationships, collocations, and co-occurrences of entities. To identify causal text, we split the corpus into PreModafinil and PostModafinil and used n-gram analysis. To evaluate sentiment, we calculated the polarity of each post between −1 (negative) and +1 (positive). NLP results were mapped to qualitative results. Results: Posters had used Modafinil for 33 different primary conditions. Eight themes were identified: the reason for taking (condition or symptom), impact of symptoms, acquisition, dosage, side effects, other interventions tried or compared to, effectiveness of Modafinil, and quality of life outcomes. Posters reported perceived effectiveness as follows: 68% positive, 12% mixed, 18% negative. Our classification was consistent with poster ratings. Of the most frequent 100 keywords/keyterms identified by term extraction 88/100 keywords and 84/100 keyterms mapped directly to the eight themes. Seven keyterms indicated negation and temporal states. Sentiment was as follows 72% positive sentiment 4% neutral 24% negative. Matching of sentiment between the qualitative and NLP methods was accurate in 64.2% of posts. If we allow for one category difference matching was accurate in 85% of posts. Conclusions: User generated patient experience is a rich resource for evaluating real world effectiveness, understanding patient perspectives, and identifying research gaps. Both methods successfully identified the entities and topics contained in the posts. In contrast to current evidence, posters with a wide range of other conditions found Modafinil effective. Perceived causality and effectiveness were identified by both methods demonstrating the potential to augment existing knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Walsh
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Cave
- Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Frances Griffiths
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma A, Mrugala MM. Supportive care for patients with brain metastases from lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3258-3268. [PMID: 34164218 PMCID: PMC8182494 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rbmlc-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the most common cause of intracranial metastases (ICM). Metastases in the brain can result in a broad range of uncomfortable symptoms and significant morbidity secondary to neurological disability. Treatment options can range from surgical resection of solitary metastases to radiotherapy and more recently systemic targeted therapies and immunotherapy. Patient survival continues to improve with innovations made in treatments for this condition, but each of these treatments carry their own adverse effects that must be appropriately managed. These patients can benefit greatly from multidisciplinary care throughout the course of their disease. Clinicians involved in their care must be equipped with the ability to communicate skillfully and compassionately and set expectations for the road ahead, including symptoms, treatment plans, and prognosis. Involvement of a palliative care team can be very helpful, especially for patients who are nearing the terminal stages of the disease. Palliative care skills may be invaluable in the management of symptoms and can ease suffering for patients and their caregivers, thus allowing for maximum quality of life for as long as possible. End of life may bring its own complications and challenges; and opinion of an experienced and knowledgeable clinician can alleviate the pain and distress of the patient and also bring peace to the caregivers and loved ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Translational Neurosciences and Neurotherapeutics; John Wayne Cancer Institute and Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Maciej M Mrugala
- Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Neuro-Oncology Program, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abraham AG, Roa W. Hippocampal avoidance in prophylactic cranial irradiation for small cell lung cancer: benefits and pitfalls. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3235-3245. [PMID: 34164216 PMCID: PMC8182537 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rbmlc-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Small cell lung cancers (SCLC) are a group of cancers that are clinically and pathologically different from other lung cancers. They are associated with high recurrence rates and mortality, and many patients present with metastatic disease. Approximately ten percent of SCLC patients have brain metastases at time of diagnosis, and the cumulative incidence of brain metastases increases to more than fifty percent at two years, even with optimal treatment. Hence, in patients without brain metastases at presentation, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is an important component of treatment along with systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The goal of PCI is to decrease the incidence of subsequent symptomatic brain metastases in patients who show an initial response to the systemic treatment. Various clinical trials have evaluated the utility of PCI and found substantial benefit. Unfortunately, the long-term toxicity associated with PCI, namely the neuro-cognitive impairment that may develop in patients as a result of the radiation toxicity to the hippocampal areas of the brain, has raised concern both for patients and their treating physicians. Various techniques have been tried to ameliorate the neuro-cognitive impairment associated with PCI, including pharmacological agents and highly conformal hippocampal avoidance radiation. All of these have shown promise, but there is a lack of clarity about the optimal way forward. Hippocampal avoidance PCI appears to be an excellent option and a number of groups are currently evaluating this technique. Although there is clear benefit with this specialized radiation treatment, there are also concerns about the risk of disease recurrence in the undertreated hippocampal areas. This review attempts to compile the available data regarding the benefits and pitfalls associated with hippocampal avoidance PCI in the setting of SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wilson Roa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dubé-Pelletier M, Labbé C. Routine Neuroimaging in Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Center Experience. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1125-1136. [PMID: 33801445 PMCID: PMC8025755 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28020108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of consensus in current practice guidelines regarding routine neuroimaging in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without neurologic symptoms, and there is a paucity of data on the impact of such imaging on overall survival (OS). Methods: This retrospective study included 257 patients with stage IV NSCLC without neurologic symptoms diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 at Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ). The primary objective of this study was to compare the evolution of patients with stage IV NSCLC who had baseline brain imaging versus with who did not. Secondary objectives were to determine the proportion of patients who underwent brain imaging in their initial investigation and the proportion of patients who developed metachronous central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Results: CNS imaging, mainly with computed tomography (CT), was performed at diagnosis in 56% of patients, and the prevalence of synchronous CNS metastasis among these patients was 32%. There was no difference in median OS between patients who underwent initial CNS imaging and those who did not, but we did show a tendency for a higher cumulative incidence of metachronous CNS metastasis in patients without baseline imaging. These metachronous metastases were symptomatic and were more often not treated when compared to synchronous metastases. Conclusions: In this small, unicentric retrospective study, there was no benefit with routine neuroimaging in terms of median OS in stage IV NSCLC patients without neurologic symptoms.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hinkle JJ, Olschowka JA, Love TM, Williams JP, O'Banion MK. Cranial irradiation mediated spine loss is sex-specific and complement receptor-3 dependent in male mice. Sci Rep 2019; 9:18899. [PMID: 31827187 PMCID: PMC6906384 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55366-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cranial irradiation is the main therapeutic treatment for primary and metastatic malignancies in the brain. However, cranial radiation therapy produces long-term impairment in memory, information processing, and attention that contribute to a decline in quality of life. The hippocampal neural network is fundamental for proper storage and retrieval of episodic and spatial memories, suggesting that hippocampal signaling dysfunction could be responsible for the progressive memory deficits observed following irradiation. Previous rodent studies demonstrated that irradiation induces significant loss in dendritic spine number, alters spine morphology, and is associated with behavioral task deficits. Additionally, the literature suggests a common mechanism in which synaptic elimination via microglial-mediated phagocytosis is complement dependent and associated with cognitive impairment in aging as well as disease. We demonstrate sexual dimorphisms in irradiation-mediated alterations of microglia activation markers and dendritic spine density. Further, we find that the significant dendritic spine loss observed in male mice following irradiation is microglia complement receptor 3 (CR3)-dependent. By identifying sex-dependent cellular and molecular factors underlying irradiation-mediated spine loss, therapies can be developed to counteract irradiation-induced cognitive decline and improve patient quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua J Hinkle
- Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Neuroscience Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA
| | - John A Olschowka
- Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Neuroscience Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA
| | - Tanzy M Love
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA
| | - Jacqueline P Williams
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA
| | - M Kerry O'Banion
- Department of Neuroscience and Del Monte Neuroscience Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA. .,Department of Neurology, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, 14642, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nishino M, Soejima K, Mitsudomi T. Brain metastases in oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019; 8:S298-S307. [PMID: 31857953 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.05.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Molecular targeted therapies have significantly improved the treatment outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring driver gene mutations such as receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). However, the brain is a frequent site of recurrence, and it significantly deteriorates the prognosis of these patients. Treatment strategies include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and drug therapy depending on patient condition. First-generation EGFR/ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) demonstrates only limited efficacy for intracranial lesions probably because of low penetration through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, newly developed TKIs with improved penetration such as osimertinib for EGFR and alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, or lorlatinib for ALK have demonstrated significant intracranial activity that should contribute to improved overall survival. Whole-brain radiation therapy used to be a standard of care that confers alleviation of symptom and modest survival benefit. However, it potentially causes neurological and cognitive deficits as a chronic toxicity. With the prolonged survival owing to newer generation drugs, this toxicity is becoming more relevant. Stereotactic radiotherapy is considered when there are three or fewer lesions, and the lesions are <3 cm as local control of tumor is excellent, and neurotoxicity is less. In this review, we discuss the various aspects of brain metastases occurring in NSCLC patients with driver gene mutations. We also propose a treatment algorithm for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Nishino
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keiyu Hospital, 3-7-3 Minatomirai, Nishi-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kenzo Soejima
- Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Mitsudomi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Noll KR, Bradshaw ME, Parsons MW, Dawson EL, Rexer J, Wefel JS. Monitoring of Neurocognitive Function in the Care of Patients with Brain Tumors. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2019; 21:33. [PMID: 31250277 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-019-0573-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A detailed characterization of the nature of neurocognitive impairment in patients with brain tumors is provided, as well as considerations for clinical practice regarding neuropsychological assessment throughout the disease course. RECENT FINDINGS Neurocognitive impairment is common in patients with brain tumors and may result from the tumor itself, as a consequence of treatment, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, or in association with supportive care medications (e.g., anticonvulsant and pain medications). Serial surveillance of neurocognitive functioning in this population can facilitate medical decision-making and inform recommendations to improve patient daily functioning and quality of life. Neuropsychological assessment is increasingly recognized as a critical component of the multidisciplinary care of patients with brain tumors and has already had practice-changing effects. Further understanding of genetic risk factors for neurocognitive decline along with the development of novel assessment and intervention strategies may further enhance functioning and general well-being in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle R Noll
- Section of Neuropsychology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 431, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mariana E Bradshaw
- Section of Neuropsychology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 431, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Michael W Parsons
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Psychology Assessment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Erica L Dawson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Jennie Rexer
- Section of Neuropsychology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 431, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wefel
- Section of Neuropsychology, Department of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 431, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in brain tumor patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Neurooncol 2019; 142:565-575. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03130-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Naughton MJ, Case LD, Peiffer A, Chan M, Stieber V, Moore D, Falchuk S, Piephoff J, Edenfield W, Giguere J, Loghin M, Shaw EG, Rapp SR. Quality of life of irradiated brain tumor survivors treated with donepezil or placebo: Results of the WFU CCOP research base protocol 91105. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 5:114-121. [PMID: 29770225 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npx016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The health-related quality of life (HRQL) and fatigue of brain cancer survivors treated with donepezil or placebo for cognitive symptoms after radiation therapy were examined. Methods One hundred ninety-eight patients who completed >30 Gy fractionated whole or partial brain irradiation at least 6 months prior to enrollment were randomized to either placebo or donepezil (5 mg for 6 weeks followed by 10 mg for 18 weeks) in a phase 3 trial. A neurocognitive battery, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-fatigue, was administered at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. Results At 12 weeks, donepezil resulted in improvements in only emotional functioning (P = .04), with no significant effects at week 24. Associations by level of baseline cognitive symptoms (above or below the median score of the baseline FACT-Br "additional concerns/brain" subscale), indicated that participants with more baseline symptoms who received donepezil versus placebo, showed improvements in social (P = .02) and emotional well-being (P = .038), other concerns/brain (P = .003) and the FACT-Br total score (P = .004) at 12 weeks, but not 24 weeks. However, participants with fewer baseline symptoms randomized to donepezil versus placebo reported lower functional well-being at both 12 (P = .015) and 24 weeks (P = .009), and greater fatigue (P = .02) at 24 weeks. Conclusions The positive impact of donepezil on HRQL was greater in survivors reporting more baseline cognitive symptoms. Donepezil had significantly worse effects on fatigue and functional well-being among participants with fewer baseline symptoms. Future interventions with donepezil should target participants with more baseline cognitive complaints to achieve greater therapeutic impact and lessen potential side effects of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle J Naughton
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - L Douglas Case
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ann Peiffer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Michael Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Monica Loghin
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edward G Shaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Stephen R Rapp
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Allen DH, Myers JS, Jansen CE, Merriman JD, Von Ah D. Assessment and Management of Cancer- and Cancer Treatment-Related Cognitive Impairment. J Nurse Pract 2018; 14:217-224.e5. [PMID: 30906237 DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah H Allen
- Duke University Health System, DUMC Box 3543, Durham NC 27710
| | - Jamie S Myers
- Research Assistant Professor, Kansas Univeristy School of Nursing, Mail Stop 2029, Kansas City, KS 66160,
| | - Catherine E Jansen
- Oncology Clinical Nurse Specialist, Kaiser Permanente, 4141 Geary Blvd., San Francisco, CA 94118,
| | - John D Merriman
- Assistant Professor, New York University Meyers College of Nursing, 433 1st Avenue, New York, NY 10010,
| | - Diane Von Ah
- Associate Professor & Chair, Dept. of Community Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, 749 Chestnut St, Terre Haute, IN 47809,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Holmes EG, Holmes JA, Park EM. Psychiatric Care of the Radiation Oncology Patient. PSYCHOSOMATICS 2017; 58:457-465. [PMID: 28599843 PMCID: PMC5650081 DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2017.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent decades, psychiatrists have become increasingly involved in the care of patients with cancer. Psychiatrists are often less familiar with the field of radiation oncology than with other medical specialties. OBJECTIVE Therefore, it is beneficial for consulting psychiatrists to be familiar with the basic principles of radiation therapy (RT) and its potential neuropsychiatric sequelae. METHODS We performed a PubMed search to identify articles describing neuropsychiatric symptoms resulting from RT, including anxiety, claustrophobia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and neurocognitive impairment. We also searched for other sequelae of RT that may produce psychiatric symptoms, such as radiation necrosis and endocrinopathies. We provide a basic introduction to the delivery of RT. RESULTS Psychiatrists may be involved in the treatment of patients before, during, or after RT, and each phase of treatment produces unique considerations. Anxiety about the treatment, especially the need for immobilization with a mask, can be treatment-limiting. Adverse effects from treatment, including cognitive impairment and endocrinopathies, can result in psychiatric symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Consulting psychiatrists should be familiar with the basic principles of RT and the neuropsychiatric sequelae that may result from the treatment. Further research is needed to identify strategies to help patients tolerate RT and to identify additional preventive and therapeutic options for RT-induced cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily G Holmes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Jordan A Holmes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Eliza M Park
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhou K, Xie C, Wickström M, Dolga AM, Zhang Y, Li T, Xu Y, Culmsee C, Kogner P, Zhu C, Blomgren K. Lithium protects hippocampal progenitors, cognitive performance and hypothalamus-pituitary function after irradiation to the juvenile rat brain. Oncotarget 2017; 8:34111-34127. [PMID: 28415806 PMCID: PMC5470955 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cranial radiotherapy in children typically causes delayed and progressive cognitive dysfunction and there is no effective preventive strategy for radiation-induced cognitive impairments. Here we show that lithium treatment reduced irradiation-induced progenitor cell death in the subgranular zone of the hippocampus, and subsequently ameliorated irradiation-reduced neurogenesis and astrogenesis in the juvenile rat brain. Irradiation-induced memory impairment, motor hyperactivity and anxiety-like behaviour were normalized by lithium treatment. Late-onset irradiation-induced hypopituitarism was prevented by lithium treatment. Additionally, lithium appeared relatively toxic to multiple cultured tumour cell lines, and did not improve viability of radiated DAOY cells in vitro. In summary, our findings demonstrate that lithium can be safely administered to prevent both short- and long-term injury to the juvenile brain caused by ionizing radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Zhou
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cuicui Xie
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Malin Wickström
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Amalia M. Dolga
- Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yaodong Zhang
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Paediatrics, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Tao Li
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- Department of Paediatrics, Zhengzhou Children's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yiran Xu
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Carsten Culmsee
- Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Per Kogner
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Changlian Zhu
- Centre for Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Henan Key Laboratory of Child Brain Injury, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Klas Blomgren
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith SR, Zheng JY. The Intersection of Oncology Prognosis and Cancer Rehabilitation. CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2017; 5:46-54. [PMID: 28458958 PMCID: PMC5387014 DOI: 10.1007/s40141-017-0150-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines the delivery of rehabilitation care to cancer patients with relation to disease prognosis. This includes the evaluation when patients are referred for rehabilitation services and the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions across the cancer continuum. RECENT FINDINGS Although prognosticating life expectancy is difficult, referrals for rehabilitation interventions appear to be affected by physician attitudes towards patients with advanced disease, in part because of misconceptions about the nature of rehabilitation for oncology patients. Rehabilitation may also be underutilized in long-term survivors with no evidence of disease. Despite this, our review found that rehabilitation in advanced disease, end-of-life, geriatric cancer patients, and in long-term survivors can be beneficial. There is a relative dearth in studies on rehabilitation interventions specifically at the end-of-life. SUMMARY Cancer rehabilitation can be helpful to patients along the spectrum of cancer prognoses. Examining more accurate ways to prognosticate life expectancy, improving communication and education between oncologists and rehabilitation team members, and modifying survivorship plans to include patient education on functional changes over time may improve the delivery of rehabilitation care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Robinson Smith
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 325 E Eisenhower Pkwy, Ste 100, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
| | - Jasmine Yiqian Zheng
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 325 E Eisenhower Pkwy, Ste 100, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oh PJ, Kim J. The Effects of Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Cognitive Function in Patients With Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:E205-17. [DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.e205-e217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
18
|
Treanor CJ, McMenamin UC, O'Neill RF, Cardwell CR, Clarke MJ, Cantwell M, Donnelly M. Non-pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment due to systemic cancer treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016:CD011325. [PMID: 27529826 PMCID: PMC8734151 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011325.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that up to 75% of cancer survivors may experience cognitive impairment as a result of cancer treatment and given the increasing size of the cancer survivor population, the number of affected people is set to rise considerably in coming years. There is a need, therefore, to identify effective, non-pharmacological interventions for maintaining cognitive function or ameliorating cognitive impairment among people with a previous cancer diagnosis. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the cognitive effects, non-cognitive effects, duration and safety of non-pharmacological interventions among cancer patients targeted at maintaining cognitive function or ameliorating cognitive impairment as a result of cancer or receipt of systemic cancer treatment (i.e. chemotherapy or hormonal therapies in isolation or combination with other treatments). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Centre Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PUBMED, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and PsycINFO databases. We also searched registries of ongoing trials and grey literature including theses, dissertations and conference proceedings. Searches were conducted for articles published from 1980 to 29 September 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive impairment or to maintain cognitive functioning among survivors of adult-onset cancers who have completed systemic cancer therapy (in isolation or combination with other treatments) were eligible. Studies among individuals continuing to receive hormonal therapy were included. We excluded interventions targeted at cancer survivors with central nervous system (CNS) tumours or metastases, non-melanoma skin cancer or those who had received cranial radiation or, were from nursing or care home settings. Language restrictions were not applied. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Author pairs independently screened, selected, extracted data and rated the risk of bias of studies. We were unable to conduct planned meta-analyses due to heterogeneity in the type of interventions and outcomes, with the exception of compensatory strategy training interventions for which we pooled data for mental and physical well-being outcomes. We report a narrative synthesis of intervention effectiveness for other outcomes. MAIN RESULTS Five RCTs describing six interventions (comprising a total of 235 participants) met the eligibility criteria for the review. Two trials of computer-assisted cognitive training interventions (n = 100), two of compensatory strategy training interventions (n = 95), one of meditation (n = 47) and one of physical activity intervention (n = 19) were identified. Each study focused on breast cancer survivors. All five studies were rated as having a high risk of bias. Data for our primary outcome of interest, cognitive function were not amenable to being pooled statistically. Cognitive training demonstrated beneficial effects on objectively assessed cognitive function (including processing speed, executive functions, cognitive flexibility, language, delayed- and immediate- memory), subjectively reported cognitive function and mental well-being. Compensatory strategy training demonstrated improvements on objectively assessed delayed-, immediate- and verbal-memory, self-reported cognitive function and spiritual quality of life (QoL). The meta-analyses of two RCTs (95 participants) did not show a beneficial effect from compensatory strategy training on physical well-being immediately (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.59 to 0.83; I(2)= 67%) or two months post-intervention (SMD - 0.21, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.47; I(2) = 63%) or on mental well-being two months post-intervention (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.34; I(2) = 67%). Lower mental well-being immediately post-intervention appeared to be observed in patients who received compensatory strategy training compared to wait-list controls (SMD -0.57, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.16; I(2) = 0%). We assessed the assembled studies using GRADE for physical and mental health outcomes and this evidence was rated to be low quality and, therefore findings should be interpreted with caution. Evidence for physical activity and meditation interventions on cognitive outcomes is unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, the, albeit low-quality evidence may be interpreted to suggest that non-pharmacological interventions may have the potential to reduce the risk of, or ameliorate, cognitive impairment following systemic cancer treatment. Larger, multi-site studies including an appropriate, active attentional control group, as well as consideration of functional outcomes (e.g. activities of daily living) are required in order to come to firmer conclusions about the benefits or otherwise of this intervention approach. There is also a need to conduct research into cognitive impairment among cancer patient groups other than women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene J Treanor
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Institute of Clinical Sciences Block B, Royal Victoria Hospital Site, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT12 6BJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Day J, Gillespie DC, Rooney AG, Bulbeck HJ, Zienius K, Boele F, Grant R. Neurocognitive Deficits and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation in Adult Brain Tumors. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2016; 18:22. [PMID: 27044316 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-016-0406-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Neurocognitive deficits are common with brain tumors. If assessed at presentation using detailed neurocognitive tests, problems are detected in 80 % of cases. Neurocognition may be affected by the tumor, its treatment, associated medication, mood, fatigue, and insomnia. Interpretation of neurocognitive problems should be considered in the context of these factors. Early post-operative neurocognitive rehabilitation for brain tumor patients will produce rehabilitation outcomes (e.g., quality of life, improved physical function, subjective neurocognition) equivalent to stroke, multiple sclerosis, and head injury, but the effect size and duration of benefit needs further research. In stable patients treated with radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy, the most frequent causes of distress include neurocognitive problems, psychological factors of anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep. Exercise, neurocognitive training, neurocognitive behavioral therapy, and medications to treat fatigue, behavior, memory, mood, and removal of drugs that may be associated with neurocognitive side effects (e.g., anti-epileptic drugs) all show promise in helping patients to manage the effects of their neurocognitive impairments better. As these are complex symptoms, multidisciplinary expertise is necessary to evaluate the influence of each variable to plan appropriate support and intervention. Neurocognitive rehabilitation should therefore occur in parallel with disease-centered, medical management from the outset. It should not occur in series, as a restricted phase in a patient's pathway. It should be considered in the pre- and post-operative period where there are good prospects of recovery, as one would for any brain-injured patient, so that the person may reach their optimal physical, sensory, intellectual, psychological, and social functional level. Yet the identification and selection of patients for early neurological rehabilitation and routine evaluation of cognition is uncommon in neurosurgical wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Day
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK
| | - David C Gillespie
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK
| | - Alasdair G Rooney
- Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh, EH10 5HF, Scotland, UK
| | - Helen J Bulbeck
- Brainstrust (the brain cancer people), Yvery Court, Castle Road, Cowes, Isle of Wight, PO31 7QG, UK
| | - Karolis Zienius
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK
| | - Florien Boele
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK
| | - Robin Grant
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Belter CW. Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 2015. [DOI: 10.1002/asi.23605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|