Interventions for preventing and managing advanced liver disease in cystic fibrosis

Management of liver disease and portal hypertension in cystic fibrosis: a review

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated liver disease can significantly affect the quality of life and survival of people with CF. The hepatobiliary manifestations in CF are various, with focal/multilobular biliary cirrhosis more common in children and porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) in young adults. Portal hypertensive complications, particularly bleeding from esophagogastric varices and hypersplenism are common, while liver failure is rarer and mainly linked to biliary disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores current therapeutic options for CF-associated liver disease, presenting ongoing studies and new insights into parthenogenesis for potential future therapies.

EXPERT OPINION

Monitoring for signs of portal hypertension is essential. Limited evidence supports ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) efficacy in halting CF liver disease progression. The effect of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators on liver outcomes lacks definitive data, since patients with CF-related liver disease were excluded from trials due to potential hepatotoxicity. A proposed approach involves using UDCA and modulators in early stages, along with anti-inflammatory agents, with further therapeutic strategies awaiting randomized trials. Prevention of portal hypertensive bleeding includes endoscopic sclerotherapy or ligation of esophageal varices. Nonselective beta-blockers may also prevent bleeding and could be cautiously implemented. Other non-etiological treatments require investigation.

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (obliterative portal venopathy) is the predominant form of chronic liver disease in cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated liver disease commonly manifests as portal hypertension and its complications. We investigated the proposal that the pathophysiology is of non-cirrhotic rather than cirrhotic portal hypertension. This distinction may have important implications for treatment.

METHODS

We compared liver transplant explants from cystic fibrosis patients with explants from patients with classical cholestatic diseases, primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Presence of cirrhosis, fibrosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, biliary and portal venous pathology were recorded. Quantitation of portal venules in representative section was performed.

RESULTS

Nine patients with cystic fibrosis liver disease, 7 primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and 7 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were evaluated. Cirrhosis was present in 0/9 of CF patients and 11/14 of the PBC and PSC controls (p < 0.01). Nodular regenerative hyperplasia was present in 8/9 of the CF patients but none of the controls (p < 0.01). Portal venule numbers per 15 mm² section were significantly lower in the CF patients 52 (20-72) compared to the primary biliary cholangitis 78 (47-110) and primary sclerosing cholangitis patients, 79 (41-134) (p < 0.05). Portal sclerotic nodules were found in all the CF patients but in only one of the controls (9/9 vs 1/14 p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that non-cirrhotic portal hypertension or obliterative portal venopathy is the predominant hepatic pathophysiology in adult CF patients requiring liver transplantation. It suggests that treatments directed at the hepatic portal venous system may be more effective than current treatment directed at the biliary system in cystic fibrosis.