1
|
Salam RA, Khan MH, Meerza SSA, Das JK, Lewis-Watts L, Bhutta ZA. An evidence gap map of interventions for noncommunicable diseases and risk factors among children and adolescents. Nat Med 2024; 30:290-301. [PMID: 38195753 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02737-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Substance misuse, obesity, mental health conditions, type 1 diabetes, cancers, and cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases together account for 41% of disability-adjusted life years linked to noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) among children and adolescents worldwide. However, the evidence on risk factors and interventions for this age group is scarce. Here we searched four databases to generate an evidence gap map of existing interventions and research gaps for these risk factors and NCDs. We mapped 159 reviews with 2,611 primary studies; most (96.2%) were conducted in high-income countries, and only 100 studies (3.8%) were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The efficacy of therapeutic interventions on biomarkers and adverse events for NCDs appears to be well evidenced. Interventions for mental health conditions appear to be moderately evidenced, while interventions for obesity and substance misuse appear to be moderate to very low evidenced. Priority areas for future research include evaluating digital health platforms to support primary NCD prevention and management, and evaluating the impact of policy changes on the prevalence of obesity and substance misuse. Our findings highlight the wide disparity of evidence between high-income countries and LMICs. There is an urgent need for increased, targeted financing to address the research gaps in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rehana A Salam
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maryam Hameed Khan
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Syed Saqlain Ali Meerza
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Jai K Das
- Institute for Global Health and Development, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Laura Lewis-Watts
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zulfiqar A Bhutta
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Plaza Moral V, Alobid I, Álvarez Rodríguez C, Blanco Aparicio M, Ferreira J, García G, Gómez-Outes A, Garín Escrivá N, Gómez Ruiz F, Hidalgo Requena A, Korta Murua J, Molina París J, Pellegrini Belinchón FJ, Plaza Zamora J, Praena Crespo M, Quirce Gancedo S, Sanz Ortega J, Soto Campos JG. GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2023; 5:100277. [PMID: 37886027 PMCID: PMC10598226 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isam Alobid
- Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, España
| | | | | | - Jorge Ferreira
- Hospital de São Sebastião – CHEDV, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
| | | | - Antonio Gómez-Outes
- Farmacología clínica, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), Madrid, España
| | - Noé Garín Escrivá
- Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | | | | | - Javier Korta Murua
- Neumología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San, Sebastián, España
| | - Jesús Molina París
- Medicina de familia, semFYC, Centro de Salud Francia, Fuenlabrada, Dirección Asistencial Oeste, Madrid, España
| | | | - Javier Plaza Zamora
- Farmacia comunitaria, Farmacia Dr, Javier Plaza Zamora, Mazarrón, Murcia, España
| | | | | | - José Sanz Ortega
- Alergología Pediátrica, Hospital Católico Universitario Casa de Salud, Valencia, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kenyon CC, Strane D, Floyd GC, Jacobi EG, Penrose TJ, Ewig JM, DaVeiga SP, Zorc JJ, Rubin DM, Bryant-Stephens TC. An Asthma Population Health Improvement Initiative for Children With Frequent Hospitalizations. Pediatrics 2020; 146:peds.2019-3108. [PMID: 33004429 PMCID: PMC8609917 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-3108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A relatively small proportion of children with asthma account for an outsized proportion of health care use. Our goal was to use quality improvement methodology to reduce repeat emergency department (ED) and inpatient care for patients with frequent asthma-related hospitalization. METHODS Children ages 2 to 17 with ≥3 asthma-related hospitalizations in the previous year who received primary care at 3 in-network clinics were eligible to receive a bundle of 4 services including (1) a high-risk asthma screener and tailored education, (2) referral to a clinic-based asthma community health worker program, (3) facilitated discharge medication filling, and (4) expedited follow-up with an allergy or pulmonology specialist. Statistical process control charts were used to estimate the impact of the intervention on monthly 30-day revisits to the ED or hospital. We then conducted a difference-in-differences analysis to compare changes between those receiving the intervention and a contemporaneous comparison group. RESULTS From May 1, 2016, to April 30, 2017, we enrolled 79 patients in the intervention, and 128 patients constituted the control group. Among the eligible population, the average monthly proportion of children experiencing a revisit to the ED and hospital within 30 days declined by 38%, from a historical baseline of 24% to 15%. Difference-in-differences analysis demonstrated 11.0 fewer 30-day revisits per 100 patients per month among intervention recipients relative to controls (95% confidence interval: -20.2 to -1.8; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS A multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention reduced health care use in a high-risk asthma population, which was confirmed by using quasi-experimental methodology. In this study, we provide a framework to analyze broader interventions targeted to frequently hospitalized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chén C. Kenyon
- PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Douglas Strane
- PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - G. Chandler Floyd
- PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ethan G. Jacobi
- Office of Clinical Quality Improvement, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadephia, PA USA
| | - Tina J. Penrose
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Ewig
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sigrid Payne DaVeiga
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph J. Zorc
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Emergency Department, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David M. Rubin
- PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tyra C. Bryant-Stephens
- PolicyLab, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA,Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boeschoten SA, Dulfer K, Boehmer ALM, Merkus PJFM, van Rosmalen J, de Jongste JC, de Hoog M, Buysse CMP. Quality of life and psychosocial outcomes in children with severe acute asthma and their parents. Pediatr Pulmonol 2020; 55:2883-2892. [PMID: 32816405 PMCID: PMC7589240 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To prospectively evaluate quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial outcomes in children with severe acute asthma (SAA) after pediatric intensive care (PICU) admission compared to children with SAA who were admitted to a general ward (GW). In addition, we assessed post-traumatic stress (PTS) and asthma-related QoL in the parents. METHODS A preplanned follow-up of 3-9 months of our nationwide prospective multicenter study, in which children with SAA admitted to a Dutch PICU (n=110) or GW (n=111) were enrolled between 2016-2018. Asthma-related QoL, PTS symptoms, emotional and behavioral problems, and social impact in children and/or parents were assessed with validated web-based questionnaires. RESULTS We included 100 children after PICU and 103 after GW admission, with a response rate of 50% for the questionnaires. Median time to follow-up was 5 months (range 1-12 months). Time to reach full schooldays after admission was significantly longer in the PICU group (mean of 10 vs 4 days, p=0.001). Parents in the PICU group reported more PTS symptoms (intrusion p=0.01, avoidance p=0.01, arousal p=0.02) compared to the GW group. CONCLUSION No significant differences were found between PICU and GW children on self-reported outcome domains, except for the time to reach full schooldays. PICU parents reported PTS symptoms more often than the GW group. Therefore, monitoring asthma symptoms and psychosocial screening of children and parents after PICU admission should both be part of standard care after SAA. This should identify those who are at risk for developing PTSD, in order to timely provide appropriate interventions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley A. Boeschoten
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Paediatric SurgeryErasmus Medical Centre—Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Karolijn Dulfer
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Paediatric SurgeryErasmus Medical Centre—Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Annemie L. M. Boehmer
- Department of PediatricsMaasstad HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PediatricsSpaarne HospitalHaarlemThe Netherlands
| | - Peter J. F. M. Merkus
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
Radboudumc Amalia Children's HospitalNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Joost van Rosmalen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MCUniversity Medical CenterRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Johan C. de Jongste
- Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical CenterSophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Matthijs de Hoog
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Paediatric SurgeryErasmus Medical Centre—Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Corinne M. P. Buysse
- Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Paediatric SurgeryErasmus Medical Centre—Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wall LA, Wisner EL, Gipson KS, Sorensen RU. Bronchiectasis in Primary Antibody Deficiencies: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Front Immunol 2020; 11:522. [PMID: 32296433 PMCID: PMC7138103 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Bronchiectasis, the presence of bronchial wall thickening with airway dilatation, is a particularly challenging complication of primary antibody deficiencies. While susceptibility to infections may be the primary factor leading to the development of bronchiectasis in these patients, the condition may develop in the absence of known infections. Once bronchiectasis is present, the lungs are subject to a progressive cycle involving both infectious and non-infectious factors. If bronchiectasis is not identified or not managed appropriately, the cycle proceeds unchecked and yields advanced and permanent lung damage. Severe symptoms may limit exercise tolerance, require frequent hospitalizations, profoundly impair quality of life (QOL), and lead to early death. This review article focuses on the appropriate identification and management of bronchiectasis in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. The underlying immune deficiency and the bronchiectasis need to be treated from combined immunology and pulmonary perspectives, reflected in this review by experts from both fields. An aggressive multidisciplinary approach may reduce exacerbations and slow the progression of permanent lung damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke A Wall
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States.,Children's Hospital of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Elizabeth L Wisner
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States.,Children's Hospital of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Kevin S Gipson
- Division of Pulmonology and Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ricardo U Sorensen
- Division of Allergy Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schutz KL, Marchant JM, Chang AB, Turner C, Chatfield MD, McCallum GB. Perspective: Using Bronchiectasis Action Management Plans for Children With Bronchiectasis-Can It Improve Clinical Care? Front Pediatr 2019; 7:428. [PMID: 31737587 PMCID: PMC6831557 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
While once thought to be rare, bronchiectasis has been increasing globally over the last 15 years. Bronchiectasis is a major contributor to chronic lung morbidity and mortality but remains a neglected disease in respiratory health globally. Currently, few high-level evidence-based management strategies are available for children with bronchiectasis. Strategies to improve clinical outcomes associated with exacerbations are important. In other respiratory conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of personalized written management plans have been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Personalized management plans have also been recommended as part of treatment plans in adults with bronchiectasis. We thus undertook a review of the current literature to determine available evidence, and to establish whether a personalized written bronchiectasis action management plan (BAMP) improves clinical outcomes in children with bronchiectasis. Our search identified 43 articles; 16 duplicates were removed and a further 23 were excluded on titles and abstracts alone. Four full-text articles were reviewed but excluded. In the absence of any published studies, it remains unknown whether the use of BAMP is beneficial for improving clinical outcomes for children with bronchiectasis. These results have highlighted this clinical gap and identified the need for high-quality research to inform practice. Until high-quality evidence is available, clinicians are advised to adhere to current national and/or international guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kobi L Schutz
- Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia
- College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Julie M Marchant
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, Center for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Anne B Chang
- Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, Center for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Catherine Turner
- College of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Mark D Chatfield
- Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hall KK, Petsky HL, Chang AB, O'Grady KF. Caseworker-assigned discharge plans to prevent hospital readmission for acute exacerbations in children with chronic respiratory illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 11:CD012315. [PMID: 30387126 PMCID: PMC6517201 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012315.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic respiratory conditions are major causes of mortality and morbidity. Children with chronic health conditions have increased morbidity associated with their physical, emotional, and general well-being. Acute respiratory exacerbations (AREs) are common in children with chronic respiratory disease, often requiring admission to hospital. Reducing the frequency of AREs and recurrent hospitalisations is therefore an important goal in the individual and public health management of chronic respiratory illnesses in children. Discharge planning is used to decide what a person needs for transition from one level of care to another and is usually considered in the context of discharge from hospital to the home. Discharge planning from hospital for ongoing management of an illness has historically been referral to a general practitioner or allied health professional or self management by the individual and their family with limited communication between the hospital and patient once discharged. Effective discharge planning can decrease the risk of recurrent AREs requiring medical care. An individual caseworker-assigned discharge plan may further decrease exacerbations. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of individual caseworker-assigned discharge plans, as compared to non-caseworker-assigned plans, in preventing hospitalisation for AREs in children with chronic lung diseases such as asthma and bronchiectasis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trials registries, and reference lists of articles. The latest searches were undertaken in November 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials comparing individual caseworker-assigned discharge planning compared to traditional discharge-planning approaches (including self management), and their effectiveness in reducing the subsequent need for emergency care for AREs (hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and/or unscheduled general practitioner visits) in children hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease. We excluded studies that included children with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane Review methodological approaches. Relevant studies were independently selected in duplicate. Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted the authors of one study for further information. MAIN RESULTS We included four studies involving a total of 773 randomised participants aged between 14 months and 16 years. All four studies involved children with asthma, with the case-planning undertaken by a trained nurse educator. However, the discharge planning/education differed among the studies. We could include data from only two studies (361 children) in the meta-analysis. Two further studies enrolled children in both inpatient and outpatient settings, and one of these studies also included children with acute wheezing illness (no previous asthma diagnosis); the data specific to this review could not be obtained. For the primary outcome of exacerbations requiring hospitalisation, those in the intervention group were significantly less likely to be rehospitalised (odds ratio (OR) 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.50) compared to controls. This equates to 189 (95% CI 124 to 236) fewer admissions per 1000 children. No adverse events were reported in any study. In the context of substantial statistical heterogeneity between the two studies, there were no statistically significant effects on emergency department (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.05) or general practitioner (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.44) presentations. There were no data on cost-effectiveness, length of stay of subsequent hospitalisations, or adherence to medications. One study reported quality of life, with no significant differences observed between the intervention and control groups.We considered three of the studies to have an unclear risk of bias, primarily due to inadequate description of the blinding of participants and investigators. The fourth study was assessed as at high risk of bias as a single unblinded investigator was used. Using the GRADE system, we assessed the quality of the evidence as moderate for the outcome of hospitalisation and low for the outcomes of emergency department visits and general practitioner consultations. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Current evidence suggests that individual caseworker-assigned discharge plans, as compared to non-caseworker-assigned plans, may be beneficial in preventing hospital readmissions for acute exacerbations in children with asthma. There was no clear indication that the intervention reduces emergency department and general practitioner attendances for asthma, and there is an absence of data for children with other chronic respiratory conditions. Given the potential benefit and cost savings to the healthcare sector and families if hospitalisations and outpatient attendances can be reduced, there is a need for further randomised controlled trials encompassing different chronic respiratory illnesses, ethnicity, socio-economic settings, and cost-effectiveness, as well as defining the essential components of a complex intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerry K Hall
- Griffith UniversityMenzies Health Institute QueenslandRecreation RoadNathanBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia4101
| | - Helen L Petsky
- Griffith UniversitySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University and Menzies Health Institute QueenslandBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Anne B Chang
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin UniversityChild Health DivisionPO Box 41096DarwinNorthern TerritoriesAustralia0811
- Queensland University of TechnologyInstitute of Health and Biomedical InnovationBrisbaneAustralia
- Lady Cilento Children's HospitalDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep MedicineBrisbaneAustralia
- Centre for Children's Health ResearchCough, Asthma, Airways Research GroupSouth BrisbaneAustralia
| | - KerryAnn F O'Grady
- Queensland University of TechnologyInstitute of Health and Biomedical InnovationBrisbaneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|