A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Transdermal Nitroglycerine Patches and Oral Nifedipine in Prolongation of Pregnancy in Women With Preterm Labour

Backgrounds A significant contributor to newborn morbidity and mortality is preterm birth. Several techniques have been employed to identify patients at risk of premature labour. However, these predictors are not always effective because of their multifactorial aetiology. Preterm labour can be suppressed largely through tocolysis. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of transdermal nitroglycerine and oral nifedipine in preventing premature labour. Methods This study was done at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, from December 2020 to November 2022, on 130 women presenting with preterm labour pains between 28 and 37 weeks of gestational age. All the women selected were randomized into two equal groups by using the envelope method. Sixty-five women were given a nitroglycerine patch (Group A), and the rest (65 women) were given an oral nifedipine tablet (group B). The variables studied were mean days of prolongation of pregnancy, treatment outcome, steroid coverage, along with feto-maternal outcomes among both groups. Results The percentage of women whose pregnancy was prolonged for at least 48 hours in the nitroglycerine group was 75.3%, and in the nifedipine group it was 93.8%. Failure to achieve tocolysis, defined as delivery within 48 hours, was seen significantly more in the nitroglycerine group (24.6%) than in the nifedipine group (6.1%). The overall foetal outcomes were comparable in both groups. Conclusion Oral nifedipine was found to be superior to transdermal nifedipine patches in terms of efficacy and safety in the management of preterm labour, with a better side effect profile.

Community-based, population-focused preterm birth prevention programs - a review

PURPOSE

Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Being born too early contributes to approximately 70% of neonatal mortality and approximately half of long-term neurodevelopmental disabilities. Various PTB prevention programs have been described going back more than 30 years, and some have described possible success in decreasing the rate of PTB. In addition, there are also PTB prenatal care clinics in many parts of the world, each with the singular goal of reducing the PTB rate in their region. Interventions can be directed at all women for primary prevention and reducing the risk of PTB or used to mitigate risk in women identified to be at increased risk.

METHODS

A Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ) search was performed (1982-2018), using preterm birth prevention program as the primary medical subject heading, reporting randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental trials, and analytic studies (including retrospective and prospective cohort studies). We also searched Google for preterm birth prevention programs and prenatal care clinics published on-line.

RESULTS

Some prevention programs have reported success in lowering rates of PTB, principally using historical controls although the majority were not followed by improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Increasing knowledge and the use of social media to enhance education should now enable greater effectiveness of new programs. Development of regional and national PTB prevention programs should now be considered.

Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Preterm birth (PTB) is a major factor contributing to global rates of neonatal death and to longer-term health problems for surviving infants. Both the World Health Organization and the United Nations consider prevention of PTB as central to improving health care for pregnant women and newborn babies. Current preventative clinical strategies show varied efficacy in different populations of pregnant women, frustrating women and health providers alike, while researchers call for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms that lead to PTB.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarise all evidence for interventions relevant to the prevention of PTB as reported in Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs). We intended to highlight promising interventions and to identify SRs in need of an update.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2 November 2017) with key words to capture any Cochrane SR that prespecified or reported a PTB outcome. Inclusion criteria focused on pregnant women without signs of preterm labour or ruptured amniotic membranes. We included reviews of interventions for pregnant women irrespective of their risk status. We followed standard Cochrane methods.We applied GRADE criteria to evaluate the quality of SR evidence. We assigned graphic icons to classify the effectiveness of interventions as: clear evidence of benefit; clear evidence of harm; clear evidence of no effect or equivalence; possible benefit; possible harm; or unknown benefit or harm. We defined clear evidence of benefit and clear evidence of harm to be GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a confidence interval (CI) that does not cross the line of no effect. Clear evidence of no effect or equivalence is GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a narrow CI crossing the line of no effect. Possible benefit and possible harm refer to GRADE low-quality evidence with a clear effect (CI does not cross the line of no effect) or GRADE moderate- or high-quality evidence with a wide CI. Unknown harm or benefit refers to GRADE low- or very low-quality evidence with a wide CI.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 SRs; 70 had outcome data. Below we highlight key results from a subset of 36 SRs of interventions intended to prevent PTB.

OUTCOME

preterm birthClear evidence of benefitFour SRs reported clear evidence of benefit to prevent specific populations of pregnant women from giving birth early, including midwife-led continuity models of care versus other models of care for all women; screening for lower genital tract infections for pregnant women less than 37 weeks' gestation and without signs of labour, bleeding or infection; and zinc supplementation for pregnant women without systemic illness. Cervical cerclage showed clear benefit for women with singleton pregnancy and high risk of PTB only.Clear evidence of harmNo included SR reported clear evidence of harm.No effect or equivalenceFor pregnant women at high risk of PTB, bedrest for women with singleton pregnancy and antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester were of no effect or equivalent to a comparator.Possible benefitFour SRs found possible benefit in: group antenatal care for all pregnant women; antibiotics for pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria; pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation for pregnant women who smoke; and vitamin D supplements alone for women without pre-existing conditions such as diabetes.Possible harmOne SR reported possible harm (increased risk of PTB) with intramuscular progesterone, but this finding is only relevant to women with multiple pregnancy and high risk of PTB. Another review found possible harm with vitamin D, calcium and other minerals for pregnant women without pre-existing conditions.

OUTCOME

perinatal deathClear evidence of benefitTwo SRs reported clear evidence of benefit to reduce pregnant women's risk of perinatal death: midwife-led continuity models of care for all pregnant women; and fetal and umbilical Doppler for high-risk pregnant women.Clear evidence of harmNo included SR reported clear evidence of harm.No effect or equivalenceFor pregnant women at high risk of PTB, antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester was of no effect or equivalent to a comparator.Possible benefitOne SR reported possible benefit with cervical cerclage for women with singleton pregnancy and high risk of PTB.Possible harmOne SR reported possible harm associated with a reduced schedule of antenatal visits for pregnant women at low risk of pregnancy complications; importantly, these women already received antenatal care in settings with limited resources.

OUTCOMES

preterm birth and perinatal deathUnknown benefit or harmFor pregnant women at high risk of PTB for any reason including multiple pregnancy, home uterine monitoring was of unknown benefit or harm. For pregnant women at high risk due to multiple pregnancy: bedrest, prophylactic oral betamimetics, vaginal progesterone and cervical cerclage were all of unknown benefit or harm.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Implications for practiceThe overview serves as a map and guide to all current evidence relevant to PTB prevention published in the Cochrane Library. Of 70 SRs with outcome data, we identified 36 reviews of interventions with the aim of preventing PTB. Just four of these SRs had evidence of clear benefit to women, with an additional four SRs reporting possible benefit. No SR reported clear harm, which is an important finding for women and health providers alike.The overview summarises no evidence for the clinically important interventions of cervical pessary, cervical length assessment and vaginal progesterone because these Cochrane Reviews were not current. These are active areas for PTB research.The graphic icons we assigned to SR effect estimates do not constitute clinical guidance or an endorsement of specific interventions for pregnant women. It remains critical for pregnant women and their healthcare providers to carefully consider whether specific strategies to prevent PTB will be of benefit for individual women, or for specific populations of women.Implications for researchFormal consensus work is needed to establish standard language for overviews of reviews and to define the limits of their interpretation.Clinicians, researchers and funders must address the lack of evidence for interventions relevant to women at high risk of PTB due to multiple pregnancy.